JulieD
Sat Jan 29 19:57:17 CST 2005
Hi Steve
i can't replicate it either in a new file - but the problem was on a big
project file that was heading towards total corruption .... and it had heaps
of sub-tasks that were successors to their summary tasks - i looked at the
printout prior to these problems occuring and these tasks where not
sub-tasks of the summary tasks at that stage .. they then got moved around
.... and this was the start of the problems with the file ... another
problem with this file was the summary task's durations were not calculating
correctly and every time you did anything in the file you got a circular
error message which the users had been ignoring for about 2 weeks!!!!
(luckily we resuced the file and all is well now)
Cheers
JulieD
"Steve House [MVP]" <sjhouse.remove.this@to.send.hotmail.com> wrote in
message news:%23Vmx9alBFHA.3820@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> That would certainly be one, but I just did the experiment to test your
> assertion that it happens. I'm not doubting you've seen it but something
> more is going on than simply indenting a linked task under its
> predecessor. Create a new file with tasks A, B, C, and D. Link in
> sequence all 4 tasks FS. Select task C and try to indent as a subtask of
> its predecessor B. Indents to become a subtask just fine but the link B->C
> is automatically severed in the process. Link A->B is preserved and the
> start of B as set by the link cascades to become the start of C even
> though there is no direct inbound link to C itself. However, a circular
> link doesn't form.
> --
> Steve House [MVP]
> MS Project Trainer & Consultant
> Visit
http://www.mvps.org/project/faqs.htm for the FAQs
>
>
> "JulieD" <JulieD@hctsReMoVeThIs.net.au> wrote in message
> news:OziLoMhBFHA.3588@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>> Hi
>>
>> i've seen circular links created when successor tasks were made sub-tasks
>> of their predecessors ... however, the information at
>> www.mvps.org/project/faqs.htm #43 helped solve the problems.
>>
>> Cheers
>> JulieD
>>
>>
>>
>> "Steve House [MVP]" <sjhouse.remove.this@to.send.hotmail.com> wrote in
>> message news:eU$iasfBFHA.1392@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>> Gee Joe - I've never had any of the troubles you cite.
>>>
>>> Create a circular link? Delete one of the tasks and reenter it.
>>> (Actually the rare times I've tried it says "You can't do that" and
>>> won't create the link.)
>>>
>>> Tasks that won't level "properly?" What do you mean by "properly?" You
>>> might be expecting it to so something besides what it does but just
>>> because you expect something different doesn't mean you're right and
>>> it's wrong. Levelling delays work assigned to overallocated resources to
>>> resolve their time conflict. That's all it's designed to do. That's
>>> all it pretends to do. That's all it's documented to do.
>>>
>>> Ignores priorities? Did your users actually tell it to pay attention to
>>> priorities in the drop down selector on the levelling dialog page?
>>>
>>> Leveling creates task splits when told not to? Never seen it happen.
>>>
>>> Project has its limitations and quirks, no doubt about it, but the
>>> issues you're raising are, IMHO, undeserved Red Herrings. "...two of
>>> your managers take days to do schedules that should take hours..."
>>> Depending on the scope and budget of a project, planning and scheduling
>>> can take as much as 25% of the total project timeline and budget or even
>>> more for really high impact projects. If you expect a project manager
>>> will real managerial responsibilities (as contrasted with "managers" who
>>> are actually clerical staff with an inflated title instead of real
>>> authority along with a commensurate salary) to bang out a schedule for a
>>> significant project in a matter of hours I'd say your expectations are
>>> more than a little unrealistic.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Steve House [MVP]
>>> MS Project Trainer & Consultant
>>> Visit
http://www.mvps.org/project/faqs.htm for the FAQs
>>>
>>>
>>> "JoeVolcano" <Geoff@lavarockcafe.com> wrote in message
>>> news:1106928313.773444.27210@z14g2000cwz.googlegroups.com...
>>>> I've been a project user for many years. The current version has become
>>>> almost unusable. Creating circular links that cannot be undone. Tasks
>>>> that wont level properly. Leveling ignores the priorities and leveling
>>>> creates task splits when told not to.
>>>>
>>>> I have the latest update from Microsoft (Maybe that is the problem!)
>>>>
>>>> This has become very frustrating, two of my managers have spent days
>>>> working on schedules that should take hours...
>>>>
>>>> ARG!
>>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>