Steve
Wed Jul 26 11:41:54 CDT 2006
Links are permissive critters - they specify the time after when the
successor task is allowed to start, not when it WILL start. There will
always be factors that can influence its start and make it later than
the link says it should. Suppose task B was supposed to start 2 days
after task A and task A started Monday ... task B should start on Wed
according to the link but suppose when Wed came around the only resource
qualified to do task B called in sick? There's no choice but to delay
it and Project recognizes such realities.
Think of predecessor as meaning "controlling" and successor as meaning
"controlled." The start of task A plus a 2-day delay is what permits
task B to start, so task B is scheduled to start 2 days after A starts
if it otherwise possible for it to start then. So the link between the
two tasks is Start-Start with a 2 day lag time.
--
Steve House
MS Project MVP
Visit
http://www.mvps.org/project/faqs.htm for the FAQs
"John Boy" <JohnBoy@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:AAD9219D-65AE-4CAF-B99A-1CF15DA08265@microsoft.com...
> We need to manage a link between two tasks with a hard constraint. At
a set
> time from start of first task we need to start another task. We CAN
simulate
> this by using a negative lag finish to start link. If the first task
is re
> scheduled / start date changed subsiduary task keeps its relationship.
But if
> the subisudry task is rescheduled out (to the right) relationship is
not kept
> i.e. the negative lag is only constrained in one direction. This means
the
> relationship can be broken by mistake.
>
> John
>
>
>
>