WG
Mon Oct 27 12:44:33 CST 2003
I reviewed the Capacity Planning Guide you pointed out
and I have one question. They give an example of being
able to use a single server setup for SPS 2003.
With the single server setup, are both SPS 2003 and SQL
Server loaded on the same server?
Thanks.
WG
>-----Original Message-----
>According to the Capacity Planning Guide:
>
http://www.microsoft.com/sharepoint/assistance/SPScapacit
y.asp
>
>The computer running SQL Server must have sufficient
disk space to store 200
>percent of the total size of all documents stored within
the portal site.
>Each search server must have sufficient disk space to
store 50 percent of
>the total size of all documents included in the portal
site index. Each
>index server must have sufficient disk space for 25
percent of the total
>size of all documents included in the indexes on that
server.
>
>-Stephen
>
>"WG" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in
message
>news:072d01c39ca2$a9011000$a001280a@phx.gbl...
>> As part of migrating SPS 2001 to SPS 2003, I'm
interested
>> in how to setup requirements for the SQL server
backend.
>>
>> Can anyone tell me if there is a way to calculate the
SQL
>> server database requirement for SPS 2003 based on the
>> current database size for SPS 2001?
>>
>> I know that under SPS 2001 there are 2 databases being
>> used to store the data wss.mdb and wss.stm. Should the
>> size of either or both be taken into consideration to
>> help calculate what disk space will be needed for SQL
>> server? If not, what can be used to come up with an
>> estimate?
>>
>> I need an estimate to see if the current server
capacity
>> for SQL server being used by other projects will be
>> sufficient to handle the additional load from SPS
>> 2003.Also do you see any problem with the SPS 2003 SQL
>> server backend being placed on a shared server?
>>
>> Thanks again for your help.
>
>
>.
>