Re: Visual Studio 2005 Standard vs Professional by ctacke/>
ctacke/>
Sat Apr 29 14:12:07 CDT 2006
Yes, I totally missed the C++ part. For managed code Studio 05 will work
for PPC 2003. Robert is right, for C++ stick with eVC if you need to target
older devices.
-Chris
<r_z_aret@pen_fact.com> wrote in message
news:8lb7529l1e732rp3off2j8k9j0f25jabhe@4ax.com...
> On Sat, 29 Apr 2006 14:55:12 +0400, "Rafael Akchurin"
> <raf_akchurin@mail.ru> wrote:
>
>>Hello All!
>>
>>Can I use Visual Studio 2005 Standard Edition for Windows Mobile 2003 (SE)
>>and Windows Mobile 5.0 native C++ development? And for .Net Compact
>>Framework C# development?
>
> I haven't even tried VS 2005 yet, but I'm _pretty_ sure it won't
> support Windows Mobile 2003, unless you're willing to do some
> thoroughly unsupported hacks.
>
> If I'm right, you'll need to use eVC 4 to build for Windows Mobile
> 2003. And that leaves you with a less than wonderful choice:
> 1) use both eVC 4 and VS 2005
> 2) use just eVC 4 (with a little care, results _will_ run on WM 5)
> 3) use just VS 2005, with hacks
> 4) use just VS 2005 and drop support for WM 2003
>
>
>>
>>Or do I need a Visual Studio 2005 Professional edition?
>
> Chris Tacke answered this part.
>
>
>>
>>Thanks all in advance!
>>
>
> -----------------------------------------
> To reply to me, remove the underscores (_) from my email address (and
> please indicate which newsgroup and message).
>
> Robert E. Zaret, eMVP
> PenFact, Inc.
> 20 Park Plaza, Suite 478
> Boston, MA 02116
> www.penfact.com