Re: Returning to pocket pc programming - help please by legend
legend
Mon Oct 23 06:54:38 CDT 2006
"legend" <no-spam@no-spam-net99.org> wrote in message
news:uFDt8Yp9GHA.896@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
>
> Hi Jem,
>
> Since (V?)B is your first choice, VB.net should be your choice.
>
> On Jornada SH3 day, first there is WindowsCE toolkit for VC++, then
replaced
> by (independent), free embedded Toolkit 3.
> Both of these support eVB.
> However, for latest (Windows Mobile 5.0
> platform), you need at-least embedded Toolkit 4.0 + SP2, but dropped
eVB....
Some clearification, it should read :
"However, for latest (Windows Mobile 5.0 platform), you need at-least an
embedded VC++ 4.0 SP2, but there is no such thing as "eMbedded Visual
Toolkit 4.0" with (e)VB support (at least, does not release), ie MS have
dropped eVB support for it eMbedded Visual Tools family after embedded
Visual Tool 3.0. OR you can use Visual Studio 2005." (but certainly NOT
'drop eVB and VS' :) )
> I see many developer used appforge to develop VB
> (should I removed the 'V' for just 'BASIC'), due to the limiation on eVB,
> and/or other reason.
> You might need little adaption time to adapt to VB.net, for some different
> between eVB and VB.net, (in my personal view, VB have moved toward C++
> style), most of the early limitation in eVB does not appear in VB.net
> anymore, which is much more 'powerful' and efficient than previous eVB.
>
> As for the resource, as the time I write this (23 Oct 2006), dot.net
> framework does not cause too 'heavy-load' to most 'current' device
compared
> to couple of MB or less storage in early(ish) day.
>
> I would suggest you use Visual Studio 2005, it have in-build support from
> windowsce application.
>
>
> (I started with Casio Cassiopeia A-10 as my first windows-ce device, using
> windowsce toolkit for VC++ at late 97, eVC++ programmer since then (not
sure
> this is the early(ish) windowsce, but to be sure is at that time, even 'C'
> stdio.h stuff is not supported, imagine the hard-time we have gone through
> until current dot.net platform !))
>
> wp
> [dummy programmer]
>
>
> "Jem" <xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:WO-dnbDmo5h6C6bYnZ2dnUVZ8s-dnZ2d@pipex.net...
> > Hi all
> >
> > Apologies for crossposting... I originally posted this message on
> > microsoft.public.pocketpc. I then discovered this group and I think it
> more
> > appropriate that the message is posted here.
> >
> > I used to do a little bit of programming for the Pocket PC in the
> early(ish)
> > days (Jornada SH3 stuff). This was mainly conversion of programs that I
> had
> > written in Visual Basic so that they worked on the PPC. I did a couple
of
> > programs in eVB but
> > found its functionality limited as I was used to the full PC version of
> VB.
> > I also converted a couple of my programs using Appforge which worked
fine,
> > but I always worried about the overhead of the runtime files, although I
> > guess that's not as much of an issue nowdays with there being much more
> > memory available.
> >
> > I would now like to get back into writing programs for the PPC.
> > Unfortunately, things have moved on since the turn of the century and
> > because i've done virtually no programming since then I feel completely
> out
> > of touch. I would be grateful if someone could explain exactly what I
now
> > need to be able to develop a program for Windows Mobile 5.00
> >
> > I guess i'm going to have to re-learn to some degree, but I accept that.
> > The question is what should I be using as an ex VB6 programmer,
obviously
> I
> > would like the shallowest learning curve possible. Is VB Dot Net the
way
> to
> > go or is there something I can bolt on to my VB6 that will allow me to
> > develop for the Mobile 5 platform?
> >
> > Many thanks in advance from an ageing (48 yr old!) VB programmer :-)
> >
> > Cheers
> >
> > Jem
> >
> >
> >
>
>