Since, there is a big changes on the platform and SDK. So, does the
PocketPC2002 application able to run under the PocketPC2003 platform?

regards,

Re: PocketPC 2002 and 2003 by Chris

Chris
Mon Jul 14 21:52:11 CDT 2003

Even those compiled with ATL or MFC? Vanilla CE 3.0 apps won't run without
recompile on a 4.x machine if either was used.

-Chris


"Neil Enns [MSFT]" <neile@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:%23MmvzsmSDHA.2768@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> In general, yes. We did extensive backwards compatability testing.
However,
> you should definitely grab either a 2003 device or the emulator and give
> your apps a whirl to make sure it still runs fine.
>
> --
> Neil Enns
> Lead Program Manager
> Microsoft Mobile Devices Product Group
>
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
> "Chris" <ccthou@bokia.net> wrote in message
> news:uBZ3qimSDHA.3192@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > Since, there is a big changes on the platform and SDK. So, does the
> > PocketPC2002 application able to run under the PocketPC2003 platform?
> >
> > regards,
> >
> >
>
>



Re: PocketPC 2002 and 2003 by Neil

Neil
Tue Jul 15 00:25:25 CDT 2003

I believe both ATL and MFC were re-compiled for 4.2, so yes, you'll have to
build against the new versions. Good point, I should be clear about "will
run without re-compiling" vs. "will run with a re-compile but no code
changes".

--
Neil Enns
Lead Program Manager
Microsoft Mobile Devices Product Group

This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.

"Chris Tacke, eMVP" <ctacke@NOinnovativedssSPAM.com> wrote in message
news:u1341wnSDHA.872@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Even those compiled with ATL or MFC? Vanilla CE 3.0 apps won't run
without
> recompile on a 4.x machine if either was used.
>
> -Chris
>
>
> "Neil Enns [MSFT]" <neile@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:%23MmvzsmSDHA.2768@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > In general, yes. We did extensive backwards compatability testing.
> However,
> > you should definitely grab either a 2003 device or the emulator and give
> > your apps a whirl to make sure it still runs fine.
> >
> > --
> > Neil Enns
> > Lead Program Manager
> > Microsoft Mobile Devices Product Group
> >
> > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> > "Chris" <ccthou@bokia.net> wrote in message
> > news:uBZ3qimSDHA.3192@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > > Since, there is a big changes on the platform and SDK. So, does the
> > > PocketPC2002 application able to run under the PocketPC2003 platform?
> > >
> > > regards,
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>



Re: PocketPC 2002 and 2003 by Karl

Karl
Tue Jul 15 11:34:20 CDT 2003

OK, I answered my own question. You do NOT need to copy the 2002 files into
a new 2003 project. When I first opened an existing MFC application in 4.2,
the platform manager only showed the standard sdk. What I missed was that
some of the configurations were no longer available, presumably due to
changes in nomenclature. When I added them back, the Active WCE
Configuration added POCKET PC 2003. By using my previous project setting
rather than the default, the project compiled with no error.

Regards, Karl

"Karl" <kkail@k4logic.com> wrote in message
news:u78j3WuSDHA.2480@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Neil,
>
> It appears a number of us have the same basic questions. What do we need
to
> do to take a 2002 application and upgrade it to 2003? Do we have to create
a
> new project and copy the files in as suggested in another newsgroup
> question? Which files?
>
> Thanks, Karl
>
> "Neil Enns [MSFT]" <neile@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:uCfABGpSDHA.1576@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > I believe both ATL and MFC were re-compiled for 4.2, so yes, you'll have
> to
> > build against the new versions. Good point, I should be clear about
"will
> > run without re-compiling" vs. "will run with a re-compile but no code
> > changes".
> >
> > --
> > Neil Enns
> > Lead Program Manager
> > Microsoft Mobile Devices Product Group
> >
> > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> rights.
> >
> > "Chris Tacke, eMVP" <ctacke@NOinnovativedssSPAM.com> wrote in message
> > news:u1341wnSDHA.872@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > > Even those compiled with ATL or MFC? Vanilla CE 3.0 apps won't run
> > without
> > > recompile on a 4.x machine if either was used.
> > >
> > > -Chris
> > >
> > >
> > > "Neil Enns [MSFT]" <neile@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> > > news:%23MmvzsmSDHA.2768@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > > > In general, yes. We did extensive backwards compatability testing.
> > > However,
> > > > you should definitely grab either a 2003 device or the emulator and
> give
> > > > your apps a whirl to make sure it still runs fine.
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Neil Enns
> > > > Lead Program Manager
> > > > Microsoft Mobile Devices Product Group
> > > >
> > > > This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
> > > rights.
> > > > "Chris" <ccthou@bokia.net> wrote in message
> > > > news:uBZ3qimSDHA.3192@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > > > > Since, there is a big changes on the platform and SDK. So, does
the
> > > > > PocketPC2002 application able to run under the PocketPC2003
> platform?
> > > > >
> > > > > regards,
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
>
>