Re: CE.NET 4.1 vs Pocket PC 2003 by dsw
dsw
Tue Nov 25 09:18:49 CST 2003
Well this may be starting to get a little off-topic, but I had a version
of IESAMPLE (provided by the PDA manufacturer) that ran on CE.NET 4.1 -
it doesn't run under PPC 2003. We've been unable to simply recompile,
there seem to be components required that aren't/weren't distributed with
the device's SDK. I admit this may be my lack of understanding, but I ran
into a brick wall early on and then started looking both for alternative
browsers and also to understand what the differences between the two
(CE.NET 4.1 and PPC 2003, that is) are.
pocket Internet Explorer has been improved tremendously, but it only has
support for the IE 3.02 DOM and our application expects to have the IE 5
DOM so this isn't a solution unless we rework our server application.
dan
"Chris Tacke, eMVP" <ctacke@NOinnovativedssSPAM.com> wrote in news:
##AaZZ1sDHA.3492@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl:
> IESAMPLE will probably run, but all PPCs have Pocket IE.
>
> -Chris
>
>
> "zorak" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:0f1501c3b350$dd1bad40$a301280a@phx.gbl...
>> Sorry to jump on your thread, but I'm also trying to
>> develop my own browser and I have a question.
>>
>> Will IESAMPLE work for PPC and if not is there an
>> equivalent?
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>> Zorak
>>
>> >-----Original Message-----
>> >Actually, "they" are a different team within Microsoft.
>> All PPC 2003 devices
>> >have at least the same capabilities.
>> >
>> >--
>> >Regards,
>> >
>> >Maarten Struys, eMVP
>> >PTS Software bv
>> >
>> >"dsw" <dan.wilson3@rogers.com> wrote in message
>> >news:Xns943EAB8FBC31danwilson3rogerscom@63.218.45.22...
>> >> Thanks, that helps...when you say "they choose a
>> specific set of
>> >> features" I assume you're talking about a particular
>> vendor, is that
>> >> correct? Does that mean, for instance, that the feature
>> set implemented
>> >> by HP/Compaq might be different from an offering from
>> Intermec?
>> >>
>> >> dan
>> >>
>> >> "Chris Tacke, eMVP" <ctacke@NOinnovativedssSPAM.com>
>> wrote in
>> >> news:e6cMaGxsDHA.2132@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
>> >>
>> >> > PPC is a customer of CE, so they choose a specific
>> set of features to
>> >> > include and then add their "special sauce" to that.
>> There's a lot in
>> >> > CE that's not in PPC, and there's a bit in the PPC
>> that's not in CE.
>> >> >
>> >> > -Chris
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > "dsw" <dan.wilson3@rogers.com> wrote in message
>> >> >
>> news:Xns943DDDF34E88Cdanwilson3rogerscom@63.218.45.22...
>> >> >> Well, I'll begin with an apology in case this is a
>> question that's
>> >> >> well understood or documented - but I seem to be
>> missing something.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> What, exactly are the differences between CE.NET 4.1
>> and Pocket PC
>> >> >> 2003? Specifically, I'm trying to understand why we
>> were able to
>> >> >> build a full- screen version of IE5 (distributed by
>> Microsoft as
>> >> >> IESAMPLE) but this doesn't seem to be an option for
>> PPC 2003.
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Can anybody help or point me to where I should be
>> looking for
>> >> >> answers?
>> >> >>
>> >> >> thanks,
>> >> >> dan
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>> >.
>> >
>
>