I've been reading a lot of posts where people slam the
developers of MSM05 and essentially blame them for the
fact the MSM05 is so crappy. I don't claim to know
exactly how the MSMoney team conducts its development
process but I do have experience in software development
so please allow me to educate you people a little...

The developers can certainly be blamed for some of the
defects in the application, but the majority of the design
decisions come from business analysts and marketing
types. For example, some dork in marketing decided one
day that "hey, my bank's web site only shows me the last
four characters of my account number and puts X's for the
rest. I think MS Money should work the same way!" So the
marketing dork declares that as some sort of requirement,
which then gets handed down to the development team, and
they implement it the way it was dictated to them. I
seriously doubt that the developers sit around and
collectively make decisions about things like, "hey, we
never used Money Express so I'm sure nobody else did,
let's just remove it from the application!"

So cut the developers a little slack and redirect some of
that anger towards the business folks!

Re: Stop Blaming the Developers for Everything... by someone

someone
Thu Oct 07 10:55:45 CDT 2004

OK. Whatever. I don't care who is to blame or from what group. The point
is this is sick and they know it.

"Breeto" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:18c501c4ac7e$eaf46b00$a401280a@phx.gbl...
> I've been reading a lot of posts where people slam the
> developers of MSM05 and essentially blame them for the
> fact the MSM05 is so crappy. I don't claim to know
> exactly how the MSMoney team conducts its development
> process but I do have experience in software development
> so please allow me to educate you people a little...
>
> The developers can certainly be blamed for some of the
> defects in the application, but the majority of the design
> decisions come from business analysts and marketing
> types. For example, some dork in marketing decided one
> day that "hey, my bank's web site only shows me the last
> four characters of my account number and puts X's for the
> rest. I think MS Money should work the same way!" So the
> marketing dork declares that as some sort of requirement,
> which then gets handed down to the development team, and
> they implement it the way it was dictated to them. I
> seriously doubt that the developers sit around and
> collectively make decisions about things like, "hey, we
> never used Money Express so I'm sure nobody else did,
> let's just remove it from the application!"
>
> So cut the developers a little slack and redirect some of
> that anger towards the business folks!
>



Re: Stop Blaming the Developers for Everything... by Dick

Dick
Thu Oct 07 11:28:55 CDT 2004

At what point do software developers have an ethical obligation to "Just Say
No"?

"Breeto" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:18c501c4ac7e$eaf46b00$a401280a@phx.gbl...
> So cut the developers a little slack and redirect some of
> that anger towards the business folks!



Re: Stop Blaming the Developers for Everything... by johnbusc

johnbusc
Thu Oct 07 11:40:03 CDT 2004

Short of quitting or getting fired, ethics rarely enters into the
equation for work you're paid to do (within reason, of course).

In Breeto's example however, the developer's did a great job of
implementing the XXXXX's. Too bad that was one of the very few things
they did well!

There's enough blame to go around though. Marketing drives the
product's direction. I suppose if the developers screw up good/bad
enough, it may impact marketing's progress.

Regards,
JB


Dick Watson wrote:
> At what point do software developers have an ethical obligation to
"Just Say
> No"?
>
> "Breeto" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:18c501c4ac7e$eaf46b00$a401280a@phx.gbl...
> > So cut the developers a little slack and redirect some of
> > that anger towards the business folks!


Re: Stop Blaming the Developers for Everything... by someone

someone
Thu Oct 07 12:08:31 CDT 2004

It just wasn't tested. However, it could also be some other third party.
I'm there are several companies involved. Server issues could be some
contract people or something.

"Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko@mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in
message news:%23Tne%23qIrEHA.3464@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> At what point do software developers have an ethical obligation to "Just
> Say
> No"?
>
> "Breeto" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:18c501c4ac7e$eaf46b00$a401280a@phx.gbl...
>> So cut the developers a little slack and redirect some of
>> that anger towards the business folks!
>
>



Re: Stop Blaming the Developers for Everything... by Dick

Dick
Thu Oct 07 13:03:32 CDT 2004

What's wrong with M05 cannot be tested out. Dumb ideas can be implemented
flawlessly and still be dumb ideas.

"someone" <test@test.com> wrote in message
news:%23HKqdBJrEHA.2436@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> It just wasn't tested. However, it could also be some other third party.
> I'm there are several companies involved. Server issues could be some
> contract people or something.



Re: Stop Blaming the Developers for Everything... by StevenFromTexas

StevenFromTexas
Thu Oct 07 18:03:28 CDT 2004


"Breeto" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:18c501c4ac7e$eaf46b00$a401280a@phx.gbl...
> I've been reading a lot of posts where people slam the
> developers of MSM05 and essentially blame them for the
> fact the MSM05 is so crappy . . .


I don't recall any posts on this forum by anyone connected with the release
of Microsoft Money 2005. So I can safely assume that they are ALL
embarrassed at their "quality" of work. Shame on ALL of them!



Re: Stop Blaming the Developers for Everything... by Bob

Bob
Fri Oct 08 01:13:32 CDT 2004

You very very rarely get anyone from MS posting here in any case.

Just us frustrated users! ;-)

--
Regards
Bob Peel,
Microsoft MVP - Money

For UK tips & fixes see
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=fh;EN-GB;mny.
For wishes or suggestions see
http://register.microsoft.com/mswish/suggestion.asp
or for UK wishes http://www.microsoft.com/uk/support/money/feedback

I do not respond to any emails that I have not specifically asked for.


"StevenFromTexas" <xxx@xxx.net> wrote in message
news:%230DxglLrEHA.2340@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>
> "Breeto" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:18c501c4ac7e$eaf46b00$a401280a@phx.gbl...
>> I've been reading a lot of posts where people slam the
>> developers of MSM05 and essentially blame them for the
>> fact the MSM05 is so crappy . . .
>
>
> I don't recall any posts on this forum by anyone connected with the
> release
> of Microsoft Money 2005. So I can safely assume that they are ALL
> embarrassed at their "quality" of work. Shame on ALL of them!
>
>



Re: Stop Blaming the Developers for Everything... by John

John
Sun Oct 10 19:59:05 CDT 2004

If this was a moderated group, Dick, your post should be modded to the top
of the list.

The fact is largely not that M05 doesn't work, it's that it works EXACTLY AS
DESIGNED. This is the problem. Short of a major rethink (hint, hint, lots
of people who use their own computer to track their own finances DON'T WANT
THEIR DATA TO BE REPLICATED ON OTHER BOXES just to pull data from Yodlee
enabled banks), this just isn't going to get any better in the long term.

One option, instead of MSN sync via Passport to pull Yodlee data would be to
allow them to use your EXISTING Yodlee account data. That, at least, only
leverages something I (at least) am already pretty comfortable with. Big
difference for me between a Yodlee aggregation account and replicating ALL
my data with MS servers. Absolute deal breaker. Money user, and annual
upgrade like clockwork, since 2000. Probably not going to happen this
year...

- John


"Dick Watson" <littlegreengecko@mind-enufalready-spring.com> wrote in
message news:u%23K81fJrEHA.2340@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> What's wrong with M05 cannot be tested out. Dumb ideas can be implemented
> flawlessly and still be dumb ideas.
>
> "someone" <test@test.com> wrote in message
> news:%23HKqdBJrEHA.2436@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> It just wasn't tested. However, it could also be some other third party.
>> I'm there are several companies involved. Server issues could be some
>> contract people or something.
>
>