For those of you waiting for MSFT to "fix" the problem it
has created with Money 2002, you are likely out of luck.
99% of Money 2002 users got it as a "FREE DEMO VERSION"
which came with their computers.

It is highly unlikely that MSFT plans to offer any way to
reactivate the product, since they shut it down. Do you
REALLY think this was an accident? Not.

My adivice...buy Quicken. Or anything else that doesn't
come from MSFT. I found a truly free (freeware) product
called Ace Money Lite that I plan to use. Of course I only
need checkbook record and statement balancing features.
For those of you who have complicated financial needs
Quicken is still probably the best choice.

I will NEVER buy another MSFT product. EVER.

Re: Pre-2004 Money Is Probably Dead by Tommy

Tommy
Fri Feb 20 16:32:36 CST 2004



Shelly wrote:
> For those of you waiting for MSFT to "fix" the problem it
> has created with Money 2002, you are likely out of luck.
> 99% of Money 2002 users got it as a "FREE DEMO VERSION"
> which came with their computers.

I trust you have stats from MS to prove this?

> It is highly unlikely that MSFT plans to offer any way to
> reactivate the product, since they shut it down. Do you
> REALLY think this was an accident? Not.

Yes, I do think it was an accident. A very annoying accident,
particularly considering MS took as long as they did to fix it, but an
accident nonetheless.

> My adivice...buy Quicken. Or anything else that doesn't
> come from MSFT. I found a truly free (freeware) product
> called Ace Money Lite that I plan to use. Of course I only
> need checkbook record and statement balancing features.
> For those of you who have complicated financial needs
> Quicken is still probably the best choice.

It sounds like Excel would suit your needs for financial software. The
rest of us need more than a glorified checkbook. And speaking as
someone who recently borrowed and tried Quicken, I can tell you it
sucks. The UI is not even in the same league as Money for ease of use.
And complaints about Intuit's tech support abound.

> I will NEVER buy another MSFT product. EVER.

Unless you never plan on buying another computer, that statement is most
likely a lie. Go MS bash somewhere else.

Re: Pre-2004 Money Is Probably Dead by Major

Major
Fri Feb 20 18:47:30 CST 2004


"Shelly" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:1351901c3f7fd$5d1b90a0$a101280a@phx.gbl...
> For those of you waiting for MSFT to "fix" the problem it
> has created with Money 2002, you are likely out of luck.
> 99% of Money 2002 users got it as a "FREE DEMO VERSION"
> which came with their computers.
>
> It is highly unlikely that MSFT plans to offer any way to
> reactivate the product, since they shut it down. Do you
> REALLY think this was an accident? Not.
>
> My adivice...buy Quicken. Or anything else that doesn't
> come from MSFT. I found a truly free (freeware) product
> called Ace Money Lite that I plan to use. Of course I only
> need checkbook record and statement balancing features.
> For those of you who have complicated financial needs
> Quicken is still probably the best choice.
>
> I will NEVER buy another MSFT product. EVER.

I don't know about not buying *any* Microsoft product, but I've never been
happy with MS Money. BTW, my version of Money 2002 is still working fine,
thank you. As much as I don't like Money, I've never been unhappy enough to
switch. All I use it for is to track stock quotes. I don't use it for
banking, finance tracking or anything else. My gripes have all been with the
stock reporting functions: I can't always assign assets to their proper
classes as I classify my assets differently than the classes in MS Money. MS
Money also does not track bonds the way I'd like them to be tracked. I have
to play too many games to get the correct buy price balanced against the
number of shares.

Except for daily price tracking, it's all moot anyway: the brokerages I use
supply very nice monthly and quarterly statements plus I get on demand asset
allocation charts from them. I determine my asset allocation goals, not some
program. I wasted money on the program, but I learned a lot: I don't need
these functions anyway.



Re: Pre-2004 Money Is Probably Dead by Arthur

Arthur
Sat Feb 21 01:11:26 CST 2004

I switched, read purchased, M2003 because Q... doesn't update or
support stock option prices. I have stopped running Money Updates
which should isolate me from their d/l goofs. I have no need for
advertisements and additional financial institutions.

A possible bundled M2002 solution might be to find a discounted 2003
version. That's what I would do, if I bought a branded computer,
which I don't.

arthur
----
On Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:03:25 -0800, "Shelly" wrote:
>I will NEVER buy another MSFT product. EVER.

Re: Pre-2004 Money Is Probably Dead by Major

Major
Sat Feb 21 07:17:24 CST 2004


"Arthur" <no.body.lives.here@xoxy.net> wrote in message
news:6k0e301k0vdpahr0uf817rcit2j5d93bhn@4ax.com...
> I switched, read purchased, M2003 because Q... doesn't update or
> support stock option prices. I have stopped running Money Updates
> which should isolate me from their d/l goofs. I have no need for
> advertisements and additional financial institutions.
>
Gee, I posted a similar gripe about sneaky advertising after doing an update
and MS (at least the reps here in the NG) ferverently denied any involvement
and tried to blame it on some other program. You mean it *wasn't* something
else grabbing those ads? Golly gosh gee, I'd hate to think I was *lied* to.

> A possible bundled M2002 solution might be to find a discounted 2003
> version. That's what I would do, if I bought a branded computer,
> which I don't.
>



Re: Pre-2004 Money Is Probably Dead by Arthur

Arthur
Sun Feb 22 22:02:22 CST 2004

I know you jest, but browse insider.ini and marketad.ini in your
windows/application data/money/ ... /webcache/ directory.

The marketad.ini is dated when I last ran Mny fetching my financial
updates but with Mny Update unchecked. IOW, they do what they want to
do not what we want. I should have known better than to trust that
they will do the proper thing.

arthur
--
On Sat, 21 Feb 2004 08:17:24 -0500, "Major Malfunction" wrote:
>
>"Arthur" <no.body.lives.here@xoxy.net> wrote in message
>news:6k0e301k0vdpahr0uf817rcit2j5d93bhn@4ax.com...
>> I switched, read purchased, M2003 because Q... doesn't update or
>> support stock option prices. I have stopped running Money Updates
>> which should isolate me from their d/l goofs. I have no need for
>> advertisements and additional financial institutions.
>>
>Gee, I posted a similar gripe about sneaky advertising after doing an update
>and MS (at least the reps here in the NG) ferverently denied any involvement
>and tried to blame it on some other program. You mean it *wasn't* something
>else grabbing those ads? Golly gosh gee, I'd hate to think I was *lied* to.
>
>> A possible bundled M2002 solution might be to find a discounted 2003
>> version. That's what I would do, if I bought a branded computer,
>> which I don't.