Re: Why is Money so Buggy by R
R
Thu Nov 10 06:20:07 CST 2005
"Eggman" <Eggman@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:5A99F95F-EBAD-449E-945D-9F988B024A86@microsoft.com...
>I don't know, it is possible that it is my setup (hey anything is
>possible),
> however, I am trying to be quite careful about the way I operate. I don't
> use a passport for downloading. I go to my banks website, and download
> directly from the bank to Money. I do have background banking enabled so
> that it can download my investment data.
I forgot to mention that I never use background banking. Never had much
luck with automatic downloading so I initiate it manually.
>
> Beyond that I don't do anything fancy. I download my statements every few
> days. I have a setup of bills and deposits which I link to my account.
Don't know what you mean by setup of bills and deposits linked to your
account.
>
> It is possible that having too many payees causes the second problem I
> mentioned (of course I would again suggest that if tracking that many
> payees
> causes problems in the software, the software should limit the number of
> payees - thus it would still be classified as a bug). I will try and
> clean
> out the Payees and see if the problem goes away.
My example was just an example and probably has nothing to do with your
situation. My payee problem was unusual and it was caused by the vendor
constantly changing the name format that they submit to my credit card bank.
Money was getting confused by the many very similar payee names in my list
which caused some odd mismatches. But I have hundreds of payee names in my
list and never had a problem before or since I deleted the many almost
duplicate names of that particular problem payee. So I definitely believe
Money can handle unlimited payee names without a problem and do not feel my
weird problem was a Money bug but rather poor data from the bank.
>
> Granted I don't know the inner working of the communication between my
> bank
> and Money, but it seems to me that the first problem I mentioned must be a
> bug. If everything balanced a couple of weeks ago, how am I now off by 26
> cents and that error goes back as far as the account tracks. I know that
> I
> could quite easily fix the issue by either adjusting the starting balance
> or
> by adding in a correction transaction, but I shouldn't have to.
>
It might be a bug but the way to find out is to find the error and fix it.
I do not recommend using kludges like adjusting the starting balance or
making a correction transaction. Find the error and fix that. If you have
to reconcile every statement from the beginning that is what you should do.
When you do find the error you will probably be able to figure out how it
happened.
I have occassionally had wierd small balance errors like 26 cents and I
believe most if not all of them were my fault. I don't remember specifics
because it is rare but I probably fiddled with a reconcilled transaction and
somehow changed it by mistake.
I have also seen matching errors on downloads cause small balance errors. I
almost always catch these because I download manually and verify every entry
before I accept it. But being human I have missed some mismatches which
caused a balance error that I corrected when I did my next reconcillation.
I do a formal reconcillation every month when the bank statement goes online
but I reconcile informally every few days now that I am retired and have too
much time on my hands :)
> Anyway, I took a look at Moneydancer and the User Interface sucked. If
> everyone seems to think that Quicken is even worse, then I guess I am
> stuck
> with no alternative.
MD2005's interface is different but it grows on you. But the developer just
published MD2006 beta which is supposed to have a totally new interface that
he says is more polished and professional. A stable version should be ready
in a month or so and you might want to look at it again later. I bought a
license about a year ago and I try MD every 3 months or so. It is improving
rapidly and may very well become a viable replacement for Money and Quicken.
So supporting MD is probably worth the small license fee since we need more
competition in the personal finance software field.
I think we are all stuck with no real alternative at this point, except
possibly MD. Money and Quicken are the only mainstream choices and both
MSFT and Intuit are pursuing this new "forced" upgrade deal by automatically
expiring downloads after 2 years so there is not much to choose between
them. Fortunately Money and Quicken do work reasonably well and many folks
get along fine without major problems. I believe you will be happy if you
spend more time studying how Money does things. I believe you said you have
been using Money for about a year - after 20 years of using Quicken and
Money I am still learning :)
>
> Overall I love the presentation of Money, I just get very frusterated by
> the
> fact that I have trouble getting it to do very common tasks without
> errors.
Overall, I like Money too. Hang in there, I bet you will resolve these
issues with a little more time and practice.
Regards
Bill Wood