Re: Income & Expenses Report by mb
mb
Thu Aug 30 18:58:01 PDT 2007
Tom -
Thank you. You have solved my problem. I did not realize that by having
both the investment account and the corresponding cash account checked that I
would be double counting. I have found by having the cash account checked,
but not the investment account, gives me the report info I am looking for.
If I do the opposite, then I do not see the transfer of cash from budget into
new investments.
Thanks!!!!
"Tom_0127" wrote:
> I had a similar problem, and I did the following to fix it:
>
> 1) In "Rows & Columns" check "include transfers to or from asset or
> liability accounts"
>
> 2) In "Accounts", your investment accounts should appear twice. It should
> look like this:
>
> Account Name __
> Account Name (cash) __
>
> You should have checks for all of your accounts, but clear the checks for
> the (cash) accounts.
>
> Tom
>
>
> "mb" <mb@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:811F2228-4AB3-4B25-A9F1-87255608E836@microsoft.com...
> > Thank you for taking the time to respond. I did know the option to not
> > include transfers, but I do want to include them. I ultimately want the
> > report to show my income, less my expenses, less the money I transfer into
> > investment accounts.
> >
> > Ideally I would like to see:
> > 1) Investments sold and kept as cash to show as a positive transfer (it
> > does
> > this).
> > 2) Investments purchased from cash to show as a negative transfer (it does
> > this).
> > 5) Income gained from an investment and reinvested to show as income
> > gained,
> > and then a negative transfer, for a net-zero gain on the bottom line.
> > 4) Income (like a dividend) gained and kept as cash to show as either as
> > income gained or a positive transfer - but not both, which effectively
> > doubles the bottom line. I don't understand is why MS Money.
> >
> > Is there a different report (or upgrade) that will give me this cash flow
> > analysis. I would think it would be a standard way of evaluating and
> > managing ones budget?
> >
> > I am using MS Money 2005 Delux. I am tempted to see how Quicken handles
> > this, but I have used MS Money religiously for 5 years and cringe at the
> > thought of getting all that data transfered accurately).
> >
> >
> >
> > "Dick Watson" wrote:
> >
> >> It includes them because the customization is set to include them. You
> >> can
> >> clear that setting on the Rows & Columns tab. (Assuming M04 or earlier,
> >> M05-M+ Advanced Reports and not Money Essentials (MEss) or M+Ess.)
> >>
> >> Note that the options on this are don't include / include transfers to or
> >> from asset or liability accounts / include transfers to or from accounts
> >> that aren't included in this report. If you just want to know your income
> >> less expenses, use the first, if you want different views of net cash
> >> flow,
> >> use the second (the default) or the third and play with which accounts
> >> are
> >> included.
> >>
> >> I agree you have to be very mindful of what this is actually showing to
> >> make
> >> sense of the bottom line.
> >>
> >> "mb" <mb@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:B1AC6718-9774-469F-945D-973F76F76518@microsoft.com...
> >> >I am confused by the Transfers at the end of the Income & Expenses
> >> >report.
> >> > It seems to double count on the bottom line.
> >> >
> >> > If I purchase $1000 in stock from my savings, the transfer shows
> >> > a -$1000
> >> > (negative because I have taken $1000 out of my cash and transfered it
> >> > to
> >> > an
> >> > investment).
> >> >
> >> > If I sell that stock for $1500. My report shows $500 capital gain in
> >> > income, and a positive tranfers of $1500 (positive because I have
> >> > transfered
> >> > the money back into my cash). However these are added and thus shows a
> >> > positive $2000 on the bottom line. It doubled the bottom line impact
> >> > of
> >> > the
> >> > capital gain.
> >> >
> >> > It does this with dividends to, A $100 dividend shows up as $100 of
> >> > income
> >> > and a positive $100 transfer - thus a $200 positive impact.
> >> >
> >> > Why does this report double these figures?
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>