Beware M04 bug (probably M03 as well)

In the transaction list in Category (or Classification, for that matter)
Details, voided transactions still have their original amounts added into
the total shown at the bottom of the box Total for the
Category/Classification.

I'd open a support case, but.

Tommy
Mon Mar 01 20:33:01 CST 2004

All the more reason to simply delete transactions instead of voiding them.

Dick Watson wrote:

> In the transaction list in Category (or Classification, for that matter)
> Details, voided transactions still have their original amounts added into
> the total shown at the bottom of the box Total for the
> Category/Classification.
>
> I'd open a support case, but.
>
>

via_newsgroup
Mon Mar 01 20:46:24 CST 2004

In microsoft.public.money, Dick Watson wrote:

>In the transaction list in Category (or Classification, for that matter)
>Details, voided transactions still have their original amounts added into
>the total shown at the bottom of the box Total for the
>Category/Classification.

Present in Money 2003 also. However the Reports do not have the
problem.

Dick
Mon Mar 01 21:01:39 CST 2004

Say I want to account for a voided check number? I could also zero the check
amount out. But I shouldn't have to--especially since I already printed it.

"Tommy Becker" <twbecker@nc.removeme.rr.com> wrote in message
news:ua6Jq6$$DHA.552@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> All the more reason to simply delete transactions instead of voiding them.
>
> Dick Watson wrote:
>
> > In the transaction list in Category (or Classification, for that matter)
> > Details, voided transactions still have their original amounts added
into
> > the total shown at the bottom of the box Total for the
> > Category/Classification.
> >
> > I'd open a support case, but.
> >
> >