Re: Damm Good Start by Jim
Jim
Mon Jul 21 12:01:30 CDT 2003
Vishal,
Maybe... I wouldn't know. In any event I have a 213.... IP address
Just keep me up to date on the solution.
Regards,
Jim
"Vishal Thakkar [MS]" <vishalt@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:OM%23WY2yTDHA.3700@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Hmm.
> I know of lot of ISPs that NAT their whole service. So even though you
might
> not have NAT on your premise, the ISP's gateway to the internet might
have.
> though there are no easy ways to detect this, if you have a 10.x.y.z or
> 172.x.y.z or 192.168.x.y kind of IP address, I would bet you are not "on"
> the interent but behind a NAT.
>
>
> -Vishal
> This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no
rights.
> "Jim" <jimrt@hotmail.com> wrote in message
> news:3f1a5ef3$1@news.swissonline.ch...
> > Vishal,
> >
> > Not on my end (standard lan card and cable modem). I've tried to
connect
> > with three others, only one might have had a NAT/router. Don't think
> thats
> > the problem.
> >
> > Jim
> >
> >
>
>