2003 cert

TheMSsForum.com: The Microsoft Software Forum

The MSS Forum ‹ Mcse
- Archive
  - Biz
  - MCSE
  - CRM
  - Drivers
  - Framework
  - ADO
  - ASP
  - Compact
  - Forms
  - Dotnet
  - C#
  - VB
  - FontpageGen
  - Excel
  - WorkSheet
  - Exchange
  - Setup
  - Fox
  - Fontpage
  - ASP
  - IIS
  - Entourage
  - Money
  - Messanger
  - PocketPC
  - Powerpoint
  - Project
  - Publisher
  - Excel
  - VB
  - Security
  - Portal
  - Services
  - SQLServerDev
  - SVCS
  - SQLServer
  - VB
  - VC
  - MFC
  - ExcelGen

- Previous
  - 1
    - 70-270 I just passed my exams for mcdst and am looking to take the 70-270 next. How much more material does this exam cover compared to the 70-271? How many questions? The 70-271 had 100 and the 70-272 had 50 questions.Thanks Scott D. Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214210
  - 2
    - 70-290 Does the 70-290 have ip addressing questions ie calculations? Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214204
  - 3
    - Ping:MCNGP The site is back up... for now. -- The Diabolical TGP, MCNGP #100100 mcngp.com is better than... 500 Internal Server Error Will work for bandwidth. Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214201
  - 4
    - Has anyone taken the new Vista exam 70-620 yet? Has anyone taken the new Vista exam yet? The preparation guide looks pretty slim which suggests that it's fairly easy: http://www.microsoft.com/learning/exams/70-620.mspx If anyone's had any experience of this exam and has any tips I'd like to know. Thanks Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214198
  - 5
    - PING: FRIS Contact me via MSN...got some juicy news for ya. Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214191
  - 6
    - transcender study guide Hi, I was wondering if anyone around here has used the Transcender Studyguide for the 70-290 exam. I used the guide for my 70-270 exam and I passed the first time. I would like to use the 70-290 guide now, but I can't find it anywhere. Yes, I can pay for it and download it at transcender.com but I would rather not pay $ 180,- for it. Who can point me to where I can find it? Thanks in advance! Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214190
  - 7
    - OT:Wow It sure is dead in here. Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214183
  - 8
    - Putting a SBS server into a Windows 2003 environment Hello, Yes, you read the subject correctly. I am planning to put a SBS server into an already existing environment that is ALL windows 2003 servers into a 2003 domain. I have been asked to look at the possibility of re-architecture a system where we would downsize the number of servers and put a SBS box instead. Needless to say that I am a little skeptic about the idea, but I am not the one making decisions. Based on the little research I made it seems that an SBS box needs to be the root of its forest. And it cannot trust another forest either. Is this correct ? HOW CAN I PUT this new SBS box into my existing domain then ??? Are there any other "cons" that you guys might see into doing this ? The only "pros" my manager is seeing is that the cost of Exchange 2007 + Windows 2003 is much more expensive than SBS. AND licensing for Backup Exec is much much more expensive when going full versions of Windows than SBS. Thanks Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214174
  - 9
    - OT: How about Joost? Have you tried it? Will it change the world of TV? How is the quality? (it kinda stinks here, but that's gonna change, I suspect) I haven't heard much about it before it just started to explode everywhere (kinda) a week ago, and I suspect a month from now everybody will talk about it. Jeesh, I'm part of the hype now, what is it with these guys? 53 Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214169
  - 10
    - Allitcertkiller.com exams are cheaper than Testking.co.uk exams Allitcertkiller.com exams are cheaper than Testking.co.uk exams Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214168
  - 11
    - OT: Sunday Sensations The latest in hand-held calculators! Get 'em while they're hot! http://www.compusa.com/products/product_info.asp?pfp=BROWSE&N=200887%20408377&product_code=51422384&Pn=Handheld_Calculator_W_Cover&cm_ven=Performics&cm_cat=*FatWallet.Com*&cm_pla=General&cm_ite=Primary&ref=performics http://tinyurl.com/yuq6ja Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214162
  - 12
    - ÈÃÖªÊ¶Óë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓÐ£¡ ÄúÏëÈÃ×Ô¼ºº¢×ÓÑ§ºÃÖªÊ¶Âð£¿Ïëº¢×Ó³É²ÅÓÐ¸üºÃµÄÎ´À´Âð£¿Ï£Íû¾ÍÔÚÓÚÄãµÄÁË½â£¬Çë µÇÂ½http://hi.baidu.com/bainaojy5£® Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214159
  - 13
    - Online Practice Certification Exams FREE Demonstration Exams Goto: www.wswexams.com Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214157
  - 14
    - What should a MCSA Do now ? Hay all, I have successfully completed my MCSA 2003 last year and I think I am a little far from the field. Could any systems administrator offer an advice for a colleague I already started my preparation for 70-293 exam to complete MCSE I think I will be ready at the end of the month there will be two exams left. I just need to know what I should do next. I have a vision to try CCNA, or maybe another idea is highly appreciated. Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214152
  - 15
    - Full and Part-time Trainers Needed Netdesk Corporation, The premier Microsoft Gold Certified Learning Partner in the Northwest is looking to expand our technical training staff. If you are a hot-shot with Windows Server 2003, Server Products and Technologies (Exchange, SharePoint, ISA, Security, ...), .NET Development (C# or VB.NET), or SQL Server Technologies (SQL 2000 and 2005, Reporting Services, Business Intelligence) or CISCO we have an opportunity for you. Netdesk focuses on middle tier to enterprise customers in the Northwest West, our students aren't cooks trying to learn how to program or run a network. Our students are working professionals looking to advance their skills and successfully complete projects. If you thrive on the newest Microsoft technologies and love to learn and share what you know - this is the place to be. We have great team of professional who work together to offer the very best Microsoft Technical training in the Northwest. We currently have openings for: . .NET Developers with C# and VB.NET skills . SQL Database (2000/2005) Developers with Notification Services, Reporting Services and TSQL experience . SQL Administrators (2000/2005) . Windows Server 2003 Administrators Qualifications: . Work experience with the relevant technology. . An excitement about Microsoft technology. . A love for learning and sharing. . A dynamic and interesting personality. . Ability to work as part of a close knit team. . Must be located in the Northwest (no relocation expenses provided). . Willing to accept a full time or contacted part time position (10 days per month for part time position). . Current or previous Microsoft certification preferred: * (MCT, MCSE, MCSD, MCDBA or MCP) * New certification for .NET and Database technologies * Specialization * Professional * Architect Benefits: . Netdesk offers excellent compensation, quarterly bonuses, a 401K and paid Dental/Vision/Medical insurance for the employee. . Four weeks paid vacation. . We pay for all exams and certifications . Opportunity for you and your family members to attend classes There is no better place in the Northwest to build on and develop your skills, if you are an experienced professional and have ever considered teaching contact me and explore the possibilities at resumes@netdesk.com . Jeff Roach - Netdesk Director of Instructors Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214146
  - 16
    - Each exam for $25 at Allitcertkiller.co.uk for a limited period only Each exam for $25 at Allitcertkiller.co.uk for a limited period only Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214131
  - 17
    - Windows Server 2003 Eval CD Hello, I installed this a few months ago and was wondering if anyone knows where in the os I can look to see how many days I have left before the 180 days expires? Thanks -G Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214117
  - 18
    - Help please Guys I've been given the chance to complete my MCSE and I'm unsure if this is still possible I started my MCSE2000 and have 70-210/215/216/217/218/227 Looking at Microsoft.com/MCP it does not appear that the MCSE2000 Roadtrack has been killed off Can I complete my MCSE 2000 by taking and sitting 1 more elective or Do I have to forgo all these quals now and resit the MCSE2003 track TIA Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214113
  - 19
    - First Time Test Takers.... If you've never taken a Microsoft exam you can save 40% on your first when you test with VUE Use Discount code: MSU62D585652 and take 40% off after that you can still take 20% off each additional exam with discount code: SUU7C1E9359 -- .rev "It is the mark of an educated man to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it" ~Aristotle . Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214108
  - 20
    - All new exams and new updates at Testking.co.uk with 100% passing guarantee All new exams and new updates at Testking.co.uk with 100% passing guarantee Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214107
  - 21
    - Where to begin? Where does one begin who is not going to school to learn about Windows Server 2003. I have a spare box at home with an copy of Windows Server 2003 Ent. and Std. with licenses for both through my school's program with Microsoft. I've installed Server 2003, now what? Should I have a switch and several other computers setup? I would like to gain experience with configuring, troubleshooting, installing, properly setting up an actual server that runs Server 2003. Thanks in advance. Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214089
  - 22
    - 70-296 Upgrade Exam I would like to know if you can retake the 70 -296 exam should you fail it. Regards, GDustrider Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214068
  - 23
    - OT: For those of you who want a good laff The guy who has a "thing" for Certguard double-posted his 22k diatribe over in alt.certification.mcse. I think the guy's a few fries short of a Happy Meal, myself. Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214065
  - 24
    - Become MCSE!!!! Excellent MCSE helping material , with FAQ and trouble shooting at http://it-techexperts.com/MCSE/MCSE.asp DON'T MISS!!! Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214057
  - 25
    - Part IV of the Series I'm writing This is what it's all about! Our final installment of "The cheating industry that is devaluing IT certification". This one is all about the Gunmen. We're hoping to provide you with more in the future. Enjoy the reading, comments are encouraged. http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/14695 Previous Installments Part 1: http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/13341 Part 2: http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/13646 Part 3: http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/14403 -- CertGuard You think you know IT?!?! CertGear: http://www.cafepress.com/certguard Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214053
- Next
  - 1
    - CertGuard - Info? Hi IT Community, I decided to do some research on this so called www.certguard.com. I see post over post about these braindumps. Well, let me tell you something, I have done some extensive research on this CertGuard company and I warn everybody to make a decision for themselves on this company. CertGuard claims to watch for companies that state you will pass on your first try, any company that offers 100% Pass Guarantee and not a 100% Money Back Guarantee, what is the difference? There is no difference. What seems to be really funny is that my best friend ordered off transcender.com the so called (Reader's Choice Award) and found their questions to be identical to the real exam. So, where does CertGuard go off stating that www.transcender.com and other sites listed on there website are clean when in fact they are not. Every single vendor out there put's real if not very very similar exam questions related to the real exam. You can view the list of the so called CertGuard's clean list below: http://www.certguard.com/reviews.asp Now, you see many companies listed here: "Wonder if these companies are paying for this?" Now, let's look at www.transcender.com the so called (Reader's Choice Award) winner. Which many many people have stated that in fact they do provide the exact questions on there products. According to Certguard.com, CertGuard states to stay away from the below websites that state the below: i. Every website that is owned by TestKing provides braindumps. Yes, it's that obvious! If just ONE of TestKing's websites provides braindumps, ALL of them do. ii. Sites that advertise 'Actual Exam Questions & Answers' are most likely passing off braindumps. iii. Sites that offer a '100% Pass Guarantee on the FIRST try' (most legitimate sites will offer a Money Back Guarantee, but this is completely different than guaranteeing you a passing score.) Make sure you read their Disclaimer before you jump into any commitments. OR ASK US!!!! iv. Access to ALL of their practice exams for X number of dollars is another sign of a braindump, no legitimate corporation can afford to just give away their material for next to nothing. We've seen legitimate practice exam run for as little as $40 or as much as $300 per exam, but we've never seen a legitimate site offer ALL of their Exams in a bundle for such a cheap price. v. Legitimate Practice Exams will generally cost around $100 per CD (or Exam), unless the Test Prep provider is offering a discount, but even then the kits are no less than $50 per CD. If you're looking at buying a bundle of exams for that price, then you're almost sure to be purchasing braindumps. vi. PDFs!! Not every PDF is a braindump, and not every braindump is a PDF, but the odds of getting a PDF that isn't a braindump is pretty rare. DON'T TRUST PDFs!!! Well, looking at www.transcender.com, I found the below: Furthermore, you can view more about there guarantee below: http://www.transcender.com/guarantee/ They will refund your purchase the first time if you fail. Now this is just one of the sites I picked on CertGuard's so called clean list. Click also the link below: http://www.transcender.com/dept.aspx?dept%5Fid=100000 You will see an image with a guy jumping with his leg's open, Read what it states: You will Pass the First Time Guarantee. End Of Discussion. (This is the exact wording used on jrksoftware.com, another well known braindump provider) Proof backing up my claim on transcender. Please click the below posts in newsgroups made by people ordering from transcender. http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcad/browse_thread/thread/4740b2d9d62ca55c/a282ee8503baa62f?lnk=st&q=transcender+real+questions&rnum=3&hl=en#a282ee8503baa62f Below is also another post from David Mickelson stating that Microsoft does not support transcender. http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd/browse_thread/thread/84123cf7f578717f/4fa05c8d04b0b552?lnk=st&q=transcender+real+questions&rnum=5&hl=en#4fa05c8d04b0b552 The link below is another post you can view on transcender's from the user Coffee. http://groups.google.ca/group/alt.certification.mcse/browse_thread/thread/fc929f997a2cbc7b/07825e55337c8266?lnk=st&q=transcender+real+questions&rnum=6&hl=en#07825e55337c8266 I can add more and more posts on this subject regarding Transcender but I will stop here, you can do this research yourself, but I warn you, watch for transcender staff trying to convince you otherwise on the newsgroups. To make a long story short, no one really knows if CertGuard is getting paid off, only they know. It is so funny on how they defend websites that they state are clean when people who have actually ordered from those sites state otherwise. My opinions are expressed below on the whole topic of braindumps and CertGuard: Please feel free to comment on this. 1. Braindumps don't hurt the IT industry. The Hiring Managers Incompetence is what is Hurting the IT industry. What's hurting the IT industry are incompetent hiring managers. When hiring IT staff, it is up to the employer to determine the applicant has the necessary IT skills and knowledge to perform in their job to back up their certification, and not just assume they do simply because they are certified. People who use braindumps and just plain memorize questions are easily detected by any competent hiring manager during the first interview. For example, if we were to compare 2 candidates with a CCNA certification being interviewed for the same job, and lets say one studied via CCNA instructor led classes and books, and the other simply braindumps. During the first interview, the hiring manager would surely ask the candidates some technical questions based on their CCNA assumed knowledge and skills like describe the OSI layers and their functions or something like this. The candidate that only memorized the braindumps to pass the exam would not know how to reply where as the candidate who studied hard would easily be able to answer the question. I know when I was interviewed for my job, I was tested on configuring a Cisco router with NAT, also doing an IOS upgrade on a router, and configuring MPLS on the router. I passed but the manager took extra steps to ensure that I did indeed know what I was talking about. So, what I am saying is to educate managers and companies to test there employee's instead of just assuming that they are good. 2. CertGuard looks to me to support braindump sites, and possibly has a financial interest in their supposed clean list of sites it supports. CertGaurd clearly offers only biased information so take everything you read from any of them carefully, in fact, I would not trust them at all! Reasons they are exploiting the IT industry is because they clearly state certain sites are clean when any newbie to this industry can tell they are not, and also because they are profiting from selling advertising space on their website all in the name of their bogus war on IT Braindumps and cheaters. How do we know if any of them are actually certified? How did they get their certifications? Maybe they bought them from testking? How can we trust a group of online posters who seem to use Nazi-Like rhetoric and Communist type phrases? Don't take my word for it, just check any of their posts and you will surely see this to be the case. Clearly, by simple investigation anyone can see that many of the sites Certguard supports are Braindumps ie. QuickCert.com, Trancender.com, Certways.com, jrksoftware.com etc... Could it be possible that Certguard is receiving some form of financial compensation for their support of these known braindump providers? I would have to say yes since their War on Braindumps etc.. is simply an exploit of this issue for financial gain as they are selling advertising on their website. As we all know, if something sounds too good to be true, it usually is. This has been my experience specifically with Certguard. At first glance, I thought, finally, someone who will actually do something to clean up the IT industry, but after really looking into their website, it seems 100% clear that they have a financial interest in this so called War on Braindumps. I would like to suggest that Robert Williams rename this war to "My War Against Braindump Sites I Am Not Profiting From!" because clearly as you will see below, many of the sites listed on his bogus clean list are actually well know braindumps sites which are probably paying him: - QuickCert.com - They Claim this site is clean: http://www.certguard.com/forums/topic.asp?TID=450 Clearly, this site is not clean because they have a direct link from certifyexpress.com, braindumpcentral.com, braindumps.com, which Certguard knows is a Testking owned website and a well known braindump promoting site as you will see below: On the homepage of certifyexpress.com, you will notice the very top banner advertising for Testking.com, then the one just below it advertising for Quickcert.com, and then there are 3 links for Actual- Exams.com, Testking.com and you guessed it, Quickcert.com. Clearly, you cannot dispute this evidence and clearly, certguard must have some financial interest in promoting quickcert.com. Here is another list from a CertGuard post which lists Braindump free sites: http://www.certguard.com/forums/topic.asp?TID=270 out of this list, there are clearly well KNOWN braindump sites like: Certways.com - a well known braindump site most likely owned by Testking with hosting on the same server as: - Examways.com - Examworx.com jrksoftware.com - a longtime braindump provider using the EasyCert name their homepage clearly states "you will pass the first time guaranteed! In the left menu bar with a pic of a girl jumping for joy. A simple backlink check will show that they have an incoming link from Examblasters.com, which is also another braindump site: http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://www.jrksoftware.com/&hl=en&start=10&sa=N gocertify.com - they claim to be clean, however they have a link on their site for Practice Tests with goes to goexam.com which seems to be their cover to sell braindumps with a Pass Guarantee and 25% - 50% off their products. Transcender.com - They provide a Pass on Your First Try Guarantee and practice tests that contain actual exam questions. I know this firsthand as my best friend used their material about 1 year ago and found this to be the case. Surely not clean and also seems to have an affiliate as listed next. studyexam4less.com/transcender.asp - They also provide braindumps and are well known to be doing this for some time now. They even have their own page outlining the 100% Pass Guarantee here: studyexam4less.com/Transcender-Pass-the-exam-the-first-time- Guarantee.asp certsavvy.com - offers a Pass the First Time Guarantee and is known to provide real exam questions 3. CertGuard is Childish, Immoral and Useless. They seem to always provide Useless info and no help for newcomers to the IT industry and often end up insulting and or threatening your legitimate beginner questions. CertGuard doesn't seem like a group of people I would trust with my career choices so be very careful and think for yourself. Here is a perfect example of what I am talking about: Post Topic: What requirement for MCSE The First Guy posts about the requirements for MCSE but no one other than Birol gives a useful reply. Cerebrus (who works for certguard) and Certguard both give useless, insulting replies and also show just how childish and immoral they are, so how could any one trust what such rude and immoral people say, without doing their own research: http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/898b840717f20934/61957239a6843f67?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=106&hl=en#61957239a6843f67 I would never ever trust my career choices with anything these animals say. They are basically wolves in sheeps clothing, trying to make a buck all while not helping and rudely poking fun at anyone that comes into their path! And if you think I am making this up, just check any of their posts and you will surely see their wolf like attitude speak out loud: This is in addition to what Larry J West has stated about certguard for which I agree 100%: http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcdst/browse_thread/thread/b913082dda4522e6/a6dd48bde6adf5f1?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=76&hl=en#a6dd48bde6adf5f1 Larry States: "You are right that many in the MCNGP / CertGuard group are very childish, rude beyond belief, and in most cases [90% of the time] not very helpful. Their insulting of people for no reason who are trying to help people is truly beyond my comprehension, especially since these are people who are supposedly knowledgeable enough on computers to know that UseNet exists (Not everyone does) and hence have some intelligence. So why did you join them? I think their group's goals of stamping out proxy-testers and braindumps is very laudable, but their actions are just like the outgoing Clinton officials glueing of the "W" keys on government computers - it doesn't show any intelligence, it just shows how childish they are and destroys what credibility they did have. This is a PUBLIC forum - their actions may be fine in their fraternity houses on their college campuses, but not in the real world. Their response to you in not acknowledging that this is a problem (but just criticizing you further) is another sign that they are ignorant and do not understand or care. Until they change, I will not be joining that group, which is a shame, since I too agree with cleaning up the certification mess." Even the criticism of you putting your "MCP" in your signature is a sign that some in the group's leadership deep down don't care about increasing the values of all certifications. They just want to justify their psychological need of putting people down and somehow believe that this is a good method of doing so. I would like to know why you gave them credibility for their actions by joining their group. 4. CertGuard Is not to be Trusted? Just read any of their posts and replies and you will certainly agree that they are offensive, rude, not willing to help and in the end, fraudulent as they claim to provide support for clean sites when they actually support braindump type sites. 5. CertGuard should issue a War on Incompetent Managers. But there is no financial gain in doing that! It is 100% up to the hiring manager to weed out unqualified applicants, in reality, no one cares about braindumps. Because there is no financial gain in this reality, certguard will never come to grips with this and seems to continue to pursue their fake war on cheaters! These are just my opinions made by facts and observations that I have seen and listed with regards to Certguard.com. You make you own decision? I have listed posts below that you can view and see for yourself on this so called CertGuard company: 1. Many arguments that CertGuard may be covering and providing braindumps: http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/5d98421a377bcb3b/9a3a6262b88ed1b1?lnk=st&q=certguard&rnum=2&hl=en#9a3a6262b88ed1b1 2. Exams Required for MCSE -> LarryWestMCSD (5th post down) states that CertGuard is childish, rude and most of all not helpful. This is exactly what we want to say about them in addition to their support of apparent braindump sites and exploiting this War on Braindumps for a profit via website advertising. Below is a quote taken from this post. http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcdst/browse_thread/thread/b913082dda4522e6/a6dd48bde6adf5f1?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=76&hl=en#a6dd48bde6adf5f1 "You are right that many in the MCNGP / CertGuard group are very childish, rude beyond belief, and in most cases [90% of the time] not very helpful. Their insulting of people for no reason who are trying to help people is truly beyond my comprehension, especially since these are people who are supposedly knowledgeable enough on computers to know that UseNet exists (Not everyone does) and hence have some intelligence. So why did you join them? I think their group's goals of stamping out proxy-testers and braindumps is very laudable, but their actions are just like the outgoing Clinton officials glueing of the "W" keys on government computers - it doesn't show any intelligence, it just shows how childish they are and destroys what credibility they did have. This is a PUBLIC forum - their actions may be fine in their fraternity houses on their college campuses, but not in the real world. Their response to you in not acknowledging that this is a problem (but just criticizing you further) is another sign that they are ignorant and do not understand or care. Until they change, I will not be joining that group, which is a shame, since I too agree with cleaning up the certification mess. Even the criticism of you putting your "MCP" in your signature is a sign that some in the group's leadership deep down don't care about increasing the values of all certifications. They just want to justify their psychological need of putting people down and somehow believe that this is a good method of doing so. I would like to know why you gave them credibility for their actions by joining their group. "If you would like to read more about this post, you can view this by clicking on the link below. 3. Transcender Vs. MeasureUp -> the majority of posts here doesn't even cover this topic, instead it is filled with childish and useless posts. http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/898b840717f20934/61957239a6843f67?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=106&hl=en#61957239a6843f67 4. What requirement for MCSE -> First Guy posts about the requirements for MCSE but no one other than Birol gives a useful reply. Cerebrus and CertGuard both give useless, insulting replies and also show just how childish and immoral they are, so how could any moral person trust what they say without their own research: You can view this post below: http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/6586f7bd9e0c052/77d52a5acbd78c0d?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=121&hl=en#77d52a5acbd78c0d I can go on and on but I think I will stop here. Please feel free to post with regards to this information provided and give your views on this topic. Once again, this is just my opinion that certguard actually supports certain websites that provide braindumps and I hope people don't get fooled by this. Cheers!!! Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214049
  - 2
    - CertGuard - Is it a Scam? You Decide? Hi IT Community, I decided to do some research on this so called www.certguard.com. I see post over post about these braindumps. Well, let me tell you something, I have done some extensive research on this CertGuard company and I warn everybody to make a decision for themselves on this company. CertGuard claims to watch for companies that state you will pass on your first try, any company that offers 100% Pass Guarantee and not a 100% Money Back Guarantee, what is the difference? There is no difference. What seems to be really funny is that my best friend ordered off transcender.com the so called (Reader's Choice Award) and found their questions to be identical to the real exam. So, where does CertGuard go off stating that www.transcender.com and other sites listed on there website are clean when in fact they are not. Every single vendor out there put's real if not very very similar exam questions related to the real exam. You can view the list of the so called CertGuard's clean list below: http://www.certguard.com/reviews.asp Now, you see many companies listed here: "Wonder if these companies are paying for this?" Now, let's look at www.transcender.com the so called (Reader's Choice Award) winner. Which many many people have stated that in fact they do provide the exact questions on there products. According to Certguard.com, CertGuard states to stay away from the below websites that state the below: i. Every website that is owned by TestKing provides braindumps. Yes, it's that obvious! If just ONE of TestKing's websites provides braindumps, ALL of them do. ii. Sites that advertise 'Actual Exam Questions & Answers' are most likely passing off braindumps. iii. Sites that offer a '100% Pass Guarantee on the FIRST try' (most legitimate sites will offer a Money Back Guarantee, but this is completely different than guaranteeing you a passing score.) Make sure you read their Disclaimer before you jump into any commitments. OR ASK US!!!! iv. Access to ALL of their practice exams for X number of dollars is another sign of a braindump, no legitimate corporation can afford to just give away their material for next to nothing. We've seen legitimate practice exam run for as little as $40 or as much as $300 per exam, but we've never seen a legitimate site offer ALL of their Exams in a bundle for such a cheap price. v. Legitimate Practice Exams will generally cost around $100 per CD (or Exam), unless the Test Prep provider is offering a discount, but even then the kits are no less than $50 per CD. If you're looking at buying a bundle of exams for that price, then you're almost sure to be purchasing braindumps. vi. PDFs!! Not every PDF is a braindump, and not every braindump is a PDF, but the odds of getting a PDF that isn't a braindump is pretty rare. DON'T TRUST PDFs!!! Furthermore, you can view more about there guarantee below: http://www.transcender.com/guarantee/ They will refund your purchase the first time if you fail. Now this is just one of the sites I picked on CertGuard's so called clean list. Click also the link below: http://www.transcender.com/dept.aspx?dept%5Fid=100000 You will see an image with a guy jumping with his leg's open, Read what it states: You will Pass the First Time Guarantee. End Of Discussion. (This is the exact wording used on jrksoftware.com, another well known braindump provider) Proof backing up my claim on transcender. Please click the below posts in newsgroups made by people ordering from transcender. http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcad/browse_thread/thread/4740b2d9d62ca55c/a282ee8503baa62f?lnk=st&q=transcender+real+questions&rnum=3&hl=en#a282ee8503baa62f Below is also another post from David Mickelson stating that Microsoft does not support transcender. http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd/browse_thread/thread/84123cf7f578717f/4fa05c8d04b0b552?lnk=st&q=transcender+real+questions&rnum=5&hl=en#4fa05c8d04b0b552 "Yes. I did some looking back to may 28th. Here's one gentleman from Microsoft (not part of the MS Cert Team) stating they are cheat sheets. I followed it with my response. I believe it happened one other time with a leader from the Microsoft Cert team a month or two later but cannot find it. " Davin Mickelson Message 3 in thread From: Davin (a...@b.com) Subject: Re: Want to Buy Transcender 70-306 View this article only Newsgroups: Microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd Date: 2003-05-28 14:26:38 PST Hi. I find it interesting that Scott considers one of MCP Magazine's (magazine is owned and controlled by Microsoft) top sponsors as a "cheat sheet" provider. I was under the assumption that Transcender was not a Microsoft Certified Practice Test Provider (MCPTP) because of their choice not to pay Microsoft for the advertising/sales leads from the MS "TrainCert" web site. http://www.microsoft.com/traincert/mcpexams/prepare/practicetests.asp I don't know the facts. I don't work for either company. Davin Mickelson "Scott Moore [MSFT]" <scott...@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:eu9EHpUJDHA.336@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > Legitimate use of Transcender is sort of an oxymoron. They are cheat > sheets, and MS doesn't endorse them at all. > Scott Moore > Microsoft Corp. - OEM Mobile Devices TAM The link below is another post you can view on transcender's from the user Coffee. http://groups.google.ca/group/alt.certification.mcse/browse_thread/thread/fc929f997a2cbc7b/07825e55337c8266?lnk=st&q=transcender+real+questions&rnum=6&hl=en#07825e55337c8266 (I apologize for posting this twice I wanted it to be a new thread - you can also find this same message under "Re: TRANSCENDER OFFICALS BEING NOSY IN THIS NEWSGROUP...") You know I like the Transcenders - I have both purchased and been given them to use. I also agree with what is said about Braindumps to a degree. I think that a Braindump would be useful and should be comments from someone who has taken the tests but they shouldn't actually disclose the questions (or their wrong answers). So heres my question - Why is it that we feel so justified in Slamming the likes of Cheet-sheets and in the same breath defend Transcenders? This is a legitimate question (IOW I am not trying to be cute). Transcender questions a frighteningly close to the real questions so we know the research is done in the same way that the likes of Braindumps and Cheet-sheets -- why is it that we like to defend them just because they have been doing it longer -- WHY THIS WOULD BE UN-MICROSOFT OF US! I am very interested in you comments and thoughts on this - it seems to be a double standard and I am going to get a kick out of you trying to defend it. Coffee. I can add more and more posts on this subject regarding Transcender but I will stop here, you can do this research yourself, but I warn you, watch for transcender staff trying to convince you otherwise on the newsgroups. To make a long story short, no one really knows if CertGuard is getting paid off, only they know. It is so funny on how they defend websites that they state are clean when people who have actually ordered from those sites state otherwise. My opinions are expressed below on the whole topic of braindumps and CertGuard: Please feel free to comment on this. 1. Braindumps don't hurt the IT industry. The Hiring Managers Incompetence is what is Hurting the IT industry. What's hurting the IT industry are incompetent hiring managers. When hiring IT staff, it is up to the employer to determine the applicant has the necessary IT skills and knowledge to perform in their job to back up their certification, and not just assume they do simply because they are certified. People who use braindumps and just plain memorize questions are easily detected by any competent hiring manager during the first interview. For example, if we were to compare 2 candidates with a CCNA certification being interviewed for the same job, and lets say one studied via CCNA instructor led classes and books, and the other simply braindumps. During the first interview, the hiring manager would surely ask the candidates some technical questions based on their CCNA assumed knowledge and skills like describe the OSI layers and their functions or something like this. The candidate that only memorized the braindumps to pass the exam would not know how to reply where as the candidate who studied hard would easily be able to answer the question. I know when I was interviewed for my job, I was tested on configuring a Cisco router with NAT, also doing an IOS upgrade on a router, and configuring MPLS on the router. I passed but the manager took extra steps to ensure that I did indeed know what I was talking about. So, what I am saying is to educate managers and companies to test there employee's instead of just assuming that they are good. 2. CertGuard looks to me to support braindump sites, and possibly has a financial interest in their supposed clean list of sites it supports. CertGaurd clearly offers only biased information so take everything you read from any of them carefully, in fact, I would not trust them at all! Reasons they are exploiting the IT industry is because they clearly state certain sites are clean when any newbie to this industry can tell they are not, and also because they are profiting from selling advertising space on their website all in the name of their bogus war on IT Braindumps and cheaters. How do we know if any of them are actually certified? How did they get their certifications? Maybe they bought them from testking? How can we trust a group of online posters who seem to use Nazi-Like rhetoric and Communist type phrases? Don't take my word for it, just check any of their posts and you will surely see this to be the case. Clearly, by simple investigation anyone can see that many of the sites Certguard supports are Braindumps ie. QuickCert.com, Trancender.com, Certways.com, jrksoftware.com etc... Could it be possible that Certguard is receiving some form of financial compensation for their support of these known braindump providers? I would have to say yes since their War on Braindumps etc.. is simply an exploit of this issue for financial gain as they are selling advertising on their website. As we all know, if something sounds too good to be true, it usually is. This has been my experience specifically with Certguard. At first glance, I thought, finally, someone who will actually do something to clean up the IT industry, but after really looking into their website, it seems 100% clear that they have a financial interest in this so called War on Braindumps. I would like to suggest that Robert Williams rename this war to "My War Against Braindump Sites I Am Not Profiting From!" because clearly as you will see below, many of the sites listed on his bogus clean list are actually well know braindumps sites which are probably paying him: - QuickCert.com - They Claim this site is clean: http://www.certguard.com/forums/topic.asp?TID=450 Clearly, this site is not clean because they have a direct link from certifyexpress.com, braindumpcentral.com, braindumps.com, which Certguard knows is a Testking owned website and a well known braindump promoting site as you will see below: On the homepage of certifyexpress.com, you will notice the very top banner advertising for Testking.com, then the one just below it advertising for Quickcert.com, and then there are 3 links for Actual- Exams.com, Testking.com and you guessed it, Quickcert.com. Clearly, you cannot dispute this evidence and clearly, certguard must have some financial interest in promoting quickcert.com. Here is another list from a CertGuard post which lists Braindump free sites: http://www.certguard.com/forums/topic.asp?TID=270 out of this list, there are clearly well KNOWN braindump sites like: Certways.com - a well known braindump site most likely owned by Testking with hosting on the same server as: - Examways.com - Examworx.com jrksoftware.com - a longtime braindump provider using the EasyCert name their homepage clearly states "you will pass the first time guaranteed! In the left menu bar with a pic of a girl jumping for joy. A simple backlink check will show that they have an incoming link from Examblasters.com, which is also another braindump site: http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://www.jrksoftware.com/&hl=en&start=10&sa=N gocertify.com - they claim to be clean, however they have a link on their site for Practice Tests with goes to goexam.com which seems to be their cover to sell braindumps with a Pass Guarantee and 25% - 50% off their products. Transcender.com - They provide a Pass on Your First Try Guarantee and practice tests that contain actual exam questions. I know this firsthand as my best friend used their material about 1 year ago and found this to be the case. Surely not clean and also seems to have an affiliate as listed next. studyexam4less.com/transcender.asp - They also provide braindumps and are well known to be doing this for some time now. They even have their own page outlining the 100% Pass Guarantee here: studyexam4less.com/Transcender-Pass-the-exam-the-first-time- Guarantee.asp certsavvy.com - offers a Pass the First Time Guarantee and is known to provide real exam questions 3. CertGuard is Childish, Immoral and Useless. They seem to always provide Useless info and no help for newcomers to the IT industry and often end up insulting and or threatening your legitimate beginner questions. CertGuard doesn't seem like a group of people I would trust with my career choices so be very careful and think for yourself. Here is a perfect example of what I am talking about: Post Topic: What requirement for MCSE The First Guy posts about the requirements for MCSE but no one other than Birol gives a useful reply. Cerebrus (who works for certguard) and Certguard both give useless, insulting replies and also show just how childish and immoral they are, so how could any one trust what such rude and immoral people say, without doing their own research: http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/898b840717f20934/61957239a6843f67?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=106&hl=en#61957239a6843f67 CertGuard Wrote: > JJ Gitties wrote : >> you need to buy arab/english dictionary. > No, he doesn't. BTW, your name sounds very similar to somethings that > I like very much ! :P LMAO...I presume you mean DD Titties...I thought the same damb thing when he walked in. ...and I'll bet every damb one of us old pervs here did. ;) Cerebrus Wrote: > LMAO...I presume you mean DD Titties...I thought the same damb thing when he > walked in. > ...and I'll bet every damb one of us old pervs here did. ;) Holy cow ! Not you too ! :P I would never every trust my career choices with anything these animals say. They are basically wolves in sheeps clothing, trying to make a buck all while not helping and rudely poking fun at anyone that comes into their path! And if you think I am making this up, just check any of their posts and you will surely see their wolf like attitude speak out loud: This is in addition to what Larry J West has stated about certguard for which I agree 100%: http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcdst/browse_thread/thread/b913082dda4522e6/a6dd48bde6adf5f1?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=76&hl=en#a6dd48bde6adf5f1 Larry States: You are right that many in the MCNGP / CertGuard group are very childish, rude beyond belief, and in most cases [90% of the time] not very helpful. Their insulting of people for no reason who are trying to help people is truly beyond my comprehension, especially since these are people who are supposedly knowledgeable enough on computers to know that UseNet exists (Not everyone does) and hence have some intelligence. So why did you join them? I think their group's goals of stamping out proxy-testers and braindumps is very laudable, but their actions are just like the outgoing Clinton officials glueing of the "W" keys on government computers - it doesn't show any intelligence, it just shows how childish they are and destroys what credibility they did have. This is a PUBLIC forum - their actions may be fine in their fraternity houses on their college campuses, but not in the real world. Their response to you in not acknowledging that this is a problem (but just criticizing you further) is another sign that they are ignorant and do not understand or care. Until they change, I will not be joining that group, which is a shame, since I too agree with cleaning up the certification mess. Even the criticism of you putting your "MCP" in your signature is a sign that some in the group's leadership deep down don't care about increasing the values of all certifications. They just want to justify their psychological need of putting people down and somehow believe that this is a good method of doing so. I would like to know why you gave them credibility for their actions by joining their group. 4. CertGuard Is not to be Trusted? Just read any of their posts and replies and you will certainly agree that they are offensive, rude, not willing to help and in the end, fraudulent as they claim to provide support for clean sites when they actually support braindump type sites. 5. CertGuard should issue a War on Incompetent Managers. But there is no financial gain in doing that! It is 100% up to the hiring manager to weed out unqualified applicants, in reality, no one cares about braindumps. Because there is no financial gain in this reality, certguard will never come to grips with this and seems to continue to pursue their fake war on cheaters! These are just my opinions made by facts and observations that I have seen and listed with regards to Certguard.com. You make you own decision? I have listed posts below that you can view and see for yourself on this so called CertGuard company: 1. Many arguments that CertGuard may be covering and providing braindumps: http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/5d98421a377bcb3b/9a3a6262b88ed1b1?lnk=st&q=certguard&rnum=2&hl=en#9a3a6262b88ed1b1 2. Exams Required for MCSE -> LarryWestMCSD (5th post down) states that CertGuard is childish, rude and most of all not helpful. This is exactly what we want to say about them in addition to their support of apparent braindump sites and exploiting this War on Braindumps for a profit via website advertising. Below is a quote taken from this post. http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcdst/browse_thread/thread/b913082dda4522e6/a6dd48bde6adf5f1?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=76&hl=en#a6dd48bde6adf5f1 "You are right that many in the MCNGP / CertGuard group are very childish, rude beyond belief, and in most cases [90% of the time] not very helpful. Their insulting of people for no reason who are trying to help people is truly beyond my comprehension, especially since these are people who are supposedly knowledgeable enough on computers to know that UseNet exists (Not everyone does) and hence have some intelligence. So why did you join them? I think their group's goals of stamping out proxy-testers and braindumps is very laudable, but their actions are just like the outgoing Clinton officials glueing of the "W" keys on government computers - it doesn't show any intelligence, it just shows how childish they are and destroys what credibility they did have. This is a PUBLIC forum - their actions may be fine in their fraternity houses on their college campuses, but not in the real world. Their response to you in not acknowledging that this is a problem (but just criticizing you further) is another sign that they are ignorant and do not understand or care. Until they change, I will not be joining that group, which is a shame, since I too agree with cleaning up the certification mess. Even the criticism of you putting your "MCP" in your signature is a sign that some in the group's leadership deep down don't care about increasing the values of all certifications. They just want to justify their psychological need of putting people down and somehow believe that this is a good method of doing so. I would like to know why you gave them credibility for their actions by joining their group. "If you would like to read more about this post, you can view this by clicking on the link below. 3. Transcender Vs. MeasureUp -> the majority of posts here doesn't even cover this topic, instead it is filled with childish and useless posts. http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/898b840717f20934/61957239a6843f67?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=106&hl=en#61957239a6843f67 4. What requirement for MCSE -> First Guy posts about the requirements for MCSE but no one other than Birol gives a useful reply. Cerebrus and CertGuard both give useless, insulting replies and also show just how childish and immoral they are, so how could any moral person trust what they say without their own research: CertGuard Wrote: > JJ Gitties wrote : >> you need to buy arab/english dictionary. > No, he doesn't. BTW, your name sounds very similar to somethings that > I like very much ! :P LMAO...I presume you mean DD Titties...I thought the same damb thing when he walked in. ...and I'll bet every damb one of us old pervs here did. ;) Cerebrus Wrote: > LMAO...I presume you mean DD Titties...I thought the same damb thing when he > walked in. > ...and I'll bet every damb one of us old pervs here did. ;) Holy cow ! Not you too ! :P You can view this post below: http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/6586f7bd9e0c052/77d52a5acbd78c0d?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=121&hl=en#77d52a5acbd78c0d I can go on and on but I think I will stop here. Please feel free to post with regards to this information provided and give your views on this topic. Once again, this is just my opinion that certguard actually supports certain websites that provide braindumps and I hope people don't get fooled by this. Cheers!!! Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214047
  - 3
    - Hi All need some advice Hi all I have been pondering about doing my MCP 70-290 2003 Server, I user 2003 every day and have done my A+ and CCNA and started doing my 2000 MCP but never got time to finish it Can any one recommend a good self study kit. I hear many mixed things about the Microsoft kits but i need something that I can really get my teeth stuck into. Also does anyone know of any of the good online test sites that mirror the MCP tests ? Im looking to put my every day practice to the test and see what I can do. Cheers Ethan Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214037
  - 4
    - 70-284 Exam Format I have not seen as posting on this board as to the test format of 70-284. Are there only test questions or does it include simulations. -- ray3d84 Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214035
  - 5
    - Which way is better ? Hello everybody, I am an MCSA 2003 certified i would like to have an expert advice about where should i go next? should i complete MCSE or ... etc, there are so many Choices. I really like all the new technology but i have an error :D i don't know any programming language. Could i get some help ?.. Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214026
  - 6
    - All new updates at Allitcertkiller.com than Testking.co.uk All new updates at Allitcertkiller.com than Testking.co.uk Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214022
  - 7
    - Could this be where it all starts?? The headline reads: Schools say iPods becoming tool for cheaters. You'd think it was regarding certification tests, or even college exams, but nope... http://www.cnn.com/2007/EDUCATION/04/27/ipod.cheating.ap/index.html?eref=rss_offbeat Should those be the people we (read CertGuard) need to be focusing our efforts on? How do you get a point across to kids that weren't raised properly to begin with? -- CertGuard Get the new 'No Braindump' CertGear http://www.cafepress.com/certguard Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214015
  - 8
    - MCP site access I have just passed one MCSE exam, how can I get further information to access the MCP member site? Will MSFT send an e-mail to me later regarding this matter? Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214013
  - 9
    - MCP Imposters I've come across a couple of folks in my district who I am almost sure are MCP and MCSE imposters. As someone who is an MCP I find this trickery unacceptable. How can I check their status (MCP) and what do i do about it? Does MS follow up on this sort of thing? Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 214001
  - 10
    - Unemployed? Got that ol' MCSE and still can't find a j-o-b? Me, too. Click on over to http://www.unemployedmcse.com and bitch and complain all you want. It'll make ME feel better, and it'll make YOU feel better, too. You would THINK, anyway. Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 213983
  - 11
    - OT: A website truly worthy of your time... While you, the atypical MCNGP criminal, are sitting here wasting company time, stealing from your employer by posting messages that have no relevance to anything (and looking over your shoulder in case he or she is watching), you are missing out on an amazing world of beauty and feminity that has been right under your nose all along... It's... a travesty! http://fatwonderwoman.blogspot.com/ Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 213976
  - 12
    - Must Read An excellent resource on ISA Server providing in depth knowledge of configuration, bypassing proxy service, filtering cache entries, disabling traffic and much more. Worth reading!! http://www.it-techexperts.com/MCSE/MCSEISA.asp Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 213968
  - 13
    - 70-290 Exam. Hi.. All Iam planning to take my 70-290 Exam in the month of May.. Pls let me know if any nice offers is going on for the time being. now... Tks Sunil Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 213967
  - 14
    - OT: Recommendation on Imaging Software Suffice to say I am out of the loop with drive imaging software nowadays. I am doing research on the major brands on the market, but wanted your feedback on what you use -- advantages / disadvantages. Situation: 4 PC SMB that requires very minimal downtime due to its promised deadlines. I need imaging software that will restore the PC back to its original state before the failure. This software also needs to perform a daily snapshot (image backup) automatically. Any recommendation? -- Michael D. Alligood, MCSA, MCDST The I.T. Classroom - http://www.theitclassroom.com/ CertGuard - http://www.certguard.com Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 213956
  - 15
    - OT: Tuesday Titilation A Treasure Trove of Golden Poastings: http://groups.google.com/groups?wp_ml=0&as_q=&num=10&scoring=r&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=Vigo+Breadcrumbs&lr=lang_en&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=24&as_maxm=4&as_maxy=2007&safe=off http://tinyurl.com/276cgy?wp_ml=0 Because I'm too impatient to wait for Neil to post them all on the sekrit web site. COME BACK UNCLE VIGO! I wonder if the dot communists won. Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 213949
  - 16
    - OT: A star is born Tomorrow we will be invaded by a production crew filming "Yellow Handkerchief" starring William Hurt. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0954990/ They hired our parking lot (for $500) to set up a catering tent which I and my fellow employees have been invited to have full access to. Free breakfast and lunch, and a chance to get discovered. They're filming at Dot's Diner which is just behind our building and they needed a lot of extra space for their stuff. Now if I could just figure out how to get an MCNGP sign stuck up somewhere... Anyway, if anyone has something they want me to as Bill, I mean Mr Hurt, let me know. I'm sure he'll invite me to play golf or fly in his Gulfstream, you know. 0x22 Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 213939
  - 17
    - Re: Found out MCSE will be faced out in 2008. whats the alternative th On Apr 24, 6:24 am, Neil <guess...@gmail.com> wrote: > FINE! there are 4 on the stupers3krut site. under teh "Best of" Thankee from the bottom of my heart. May the "breadcrumbs" help you find your way to salvation ! Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 213926
  - 18
    - OT: Exams Scheduled for Discontinuation published... http://www.microsoft.com/learning/mcpexams/status/examstoretire.mspx -- Michael D. Alligood, MCSA, MCDST The I.T. Classroom - http://www.theitclassroom.com/ CertGuard - http://www.certguard.com Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 213907
  - 19
    - how many case studies on the 70-297 exam ? Hi im planning on taking the 70-297 exam this week and i would like to know how many case studies or questions i should expect and how much time is given Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 213879
  - 20
    - how many case studies on the 70-297 exam ? Hi im planning on taking the 70-97 exam this week and i would like to know how many case studies or questions i should expect and how much time is given Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 213878
  - 21
    - MCSA/MCSE 2000 -> 2003 Greetings everyone, A couple of years ago I had taken and passed both 70-210, 70-215, and also have my A+ and Network+ Certifications. This of course means that I am 1 test (70-218) away from my MCSA in Windows 2000. This is where the tricky part begins. I want to convert this ultimately into an MCSE 2003 without de-valueing the 210,215, and 218 exams. This means, I don't want to take the equivalents for the 2003 exam if I don't have to. I could go the "upgrade track" for MCSA in 2000 to 2003, but does it "stop there" meaning, in order to be considered an MCSE 2003, do I need to take and pass all of the specifically required exams? Or after I upgrade from MCSA 2000 to 2003, can I continue on to the 2003 MCSE track? -- Michael Cramer A+/Net+ Certified Technician Future MCSA 2003 Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 213875
  - 22
    - All new exams and updates at Testking.co.uk with moneyback guarantee All new exams and updates at Testking.co.uk with moneyback guarantee Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 213874
  - 23
    - Online Simulation Exams FREE Demos Check out: www.wswexams.com Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 213864
  - 24
    - OT: And you thought it was just the french ? This is real funny ! (Turn your speakers on) <http://tcc.itc.it/people/rocchi/fun/europe.html> SFW. Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 213859
  - 25
    - Semi-OT: Braindumps on TV Anyone happen to catch ER last nght? I rarely watch it, but I did last night. At one point, while in the emergency room working on a patient, John Stamos' character says to Mekhi Phifer's character, "I'll see if I can get your brother a copy of last year's EMT exam." (paraphrasing) So, the question I pose to my fellow members: Are you with me in boycotting NBC, for allowing such a travesty to occur during primetime? I wouldn't be so upset if this was a late-night comedy. But it's a primetime drama. Millions of people saw this, and now they could potentially think this is the right thing to do. Please join me in boycotting NBC. Tag: 2003 cert Tag: 213830

Does it make sense to get certified on 2003 if you never been cert on
2000? IE is it assumed you have that background ? I got a nt cert.

Top

Re: 2003 cert by Michael

Michael
Wed May 09 22:26:51 CDT 2007

"Joe Mc" <jpmcsale@sbcglobal.net> wrote in message
news:1178758255.700780.151560@q75g2000hsh.googlegroups.com:

> Does it make sense to get certified on 2003 if you never been cert on
> 2000? IE is it assumed you have that background ? I got a nt cert.

There is no requirement that you have an MCSE 2000 certification to
achieve your MCSE 2003 certification. Hands-on experience of the
prescribed objectives is highly recommended and encouraged to maintain
the value of the certification.
--
Michael D. Alligood, MCSA, MCDST
The I.T. Classroom - http://www.theitclassroom.com/
CertGuard - http://www.certguard.com

Top

Re: 2003 cert by Micro

Micro
Thu May 10 00:09:09 CDT 2007

[h]On May 10, 4:50 am, Joe Mc <jpmcs...@sbcglobal.net> wrote:
> Does it make sense to get certified on 2003 if you never been cert on
> 2000? IE is it assumed you have that background ? I got a nt cert.[/h]

Yes it is, I got certified in 2003 from a training center and my
knowledge is perfect, beside my career is much easier than the others
and I can consider my self the best on it tell now, for a foreign
language student as Michael has stated the hand on experiance is the
mattar.

Regards'
Micro
MCP+MCSA

Top