Frisbee®
Wed Sep 07 13:51:29 CDT 2005
"Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns96CA9533A1C06neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> did you hear "=?Utf-8?B?QW1hbiBCLg==?="
> <AmanB@discussions.microsoft.com> say in
> news:5110172C-02FD-4C98-8899-E1B2A315E233@microsoft.com:
>
>> Hi everyone,
>>
>> I'm getting a bit confused about upgrading options.
>>
>> Say, I have MCSA2000:Security (210-215-218-214-Security+)
>> Ultimate goal is to get MCSE2003:Security
>>
>> Now, from what I understood, I cannot get MCSE2000:Security upgraded
>> to MCSE2003:Secuirty.
>> So the path of MCSA2000:Sec -> MCSE2000:Sec -> MCSE2003:Sec
>> doesn't work, right?
>>
>> But then I can upgrade MCSA2000:Security to MCSA2003:plain (btw, there
>> is no MCSA2003:Security, is there?)
>> Can I then go for MCSE2003:Security with my _upgraded_ MCSA2003? Plus
>> use Security+ at the very end to get :Security spec?
>>
>> If anyone could clarify that, it would be greatly appreciated
>
> from the bottom of
>
http://www.microsoft.com/learning/mcp/mcsa/security/windowsserver2003.asp
>
> and
>
>
http://www.microsoft.com/learning/mcp/mcse/security/windowsserver2003.asp
>
> "2 Candidates who hold MCSA or MCSE on Windows 2000 credentials may take
> Exam 70-292 in place of Exams 70-290 and 70-291. In addition, candidates
> who hold an MCSE on Windows 2000 credential may take Exam 70-296 in place
> of Exams 70-293 and 70-294. "
>
> so for the MCSA 2003:Sec you would then need 70-299 and if you haven't
> taken it the ISA or Sec+ exam after taking the 70-292 exam. You could
> then theoretically finish the MCSE 2000 and write both the 70-296 exam
> and the 70-298 exam giving you MCSE on 2000 and 2003, MCSA on 2000 (which
> you have) and 2003, MCSA:Sec on 2000 (which you have) and 2003 and
> MCSE:Sec on 2003 (only).
>
> spend a bit of time in www.microsoft.com/learning and most of this pops
> up. you could also have a look at the certification planner in the MCP
> private web site.
>
> (and yes there is an MCSA:Sec 2003)
It's really been bugging you that you've been below Ben and The Rev on the
League tables, hasn't it.