Part IV of the Series I'm writing

TheMSsForum.com: The Microsoft Software Forum

The MSS Forum ‹ Mcse
- Archive
  - Biz
  - MCSE
  - CRM
  - Drivers
  - Framework
  - ADO
  - ASP
  - Compact
  - Forms
  - Dotnet
  - C#
  - VB
  - FontpageGen
  - Excel
  - WorkSheet
  - Exchange
  - Setup
  - Fox
  - Fontpage
  - ASP
  - IIS
  - Entourage
  - Money
  - Messanger
  - PocketPC
  - Powerpoint
  - Project
  - Publisher
  - Excel
  - VB
  - Security
  - Portal
  - Services
  - SQLServerDev
  - SVCS
  - SQLServer
  - VB
  - VC
  - MFC
  - ExcelGen

- Previous
  - 1
    - CertGuard - Info? Hi IT Community, I decided to do some research on this so called www.certguard.com. I see post over post about these braindumps. Well, let me tell you something, I have done some extensive research on this CertGuard company and I warn everybody to make a decision for themselves on this company. CertGuard claims to watch for companies that state you will pass on your first try, any company that offers 100% Pass Guarantee and not a 100% Money Back Guarantee, what is the difference? There is no difference. What seems to be really funny is that my best friend ordered off transcender.com the so called (Reader's Choice Award) and found their questions to be identical to the real exam. So, where does CertGuard go off stating that www.transcender.com and other sites listed on there website are clean when in fact they are not. Every single vendor out there put's real if not very very similar exam questions related to the real exam. You can view the list of the so called CertGuard's clean list below: http://www.certguard.com/reviews.asp Now, you see many companies listed here: "Wonder if these companies are paying for this?" Now, let's look at www.transcender.com the so called (Reader's Choice Award) winner. Which many many people have stated that in fact they do provide the exact questions on there products. According to Certguard.com, CertGuard states to stay away from the below websites that state the below: i. Every website that is owned by TestKing provides braindumps. Yes, it's that obvious! If just ONE of TestKing's websites provides braindumps, ALL of them do. ii. Sites that advertise 'Actual Exam Questions & Answers' are most likely passing off braindumps. iii. Sites that offer a '100% Pass Guarantee on the FIRST try' (most legitimate sites will offer a Money Back Guarantee, but this is completely different than guaranteeing you a passing score.) Make sure you read their Disclaimer before you jump into any commitments. OR ASK US!!!! iv. Access to ALL of their practice exams for X number of dollars is another sign of a braindump, no legitimate corporation can afford to just give away their material for next to nothing. We've seen legitimate practice exam run for as little as $40 or as much as $300 per exam, but we've never seen a legitimate site offer ALL of their Exams in a bundle for such a cheap price. v. Legitimate Practice Exams will generally cost around $100 per CD (or Exam), unless the Test Prep provider is offering a discount, but even then the kits are no less than $50 per CD. If you're looking at buying a bundle of exams for that price, then you're almost sure to be purchasing braindumps. vi. PDFs!! Not every PDF is a braindump, and not every braindump is a PDF, but the odds of getting a PDF that isn't a braindump is pretty rare. DON'T TRUST PDFs!!! Well, looking at www.transcender.com, I found the below: Furthermore, you can view more about there guarantee below: http://www.transcender.com/guarantee/ They will refund your purchase the first time if you fail. Now this is just one of the sites I picked on CertGuard's so called clean list. Click also the link below: http://www.transcender.com/dept.aspx?dept%5Fid=100000 You will see an image with a guy jumping with his leg's open, Read what it states: You will Pass the First Time Guarantee. End Of Discussion. (This is the exact wording used on jrksoftware.com, another well known braindump provider) Proof backing up my claim on transcender. Please click the below posts in newsgroups made by people ordering from transcender. http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcad/browse_thread/thread/4740b2d9d62ca55c/a282ee8503baa62f?lnk=st&q=transcender+real+questions&rnum=3&hl=en#a282ee8503baa62f Below is also another post from David Mickelson stating that Microsoft does not support transcender. http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd/browse_thread/thread/84123cf7f578717f/4fa05c8d04b0b552?lnk=st&q=transcender+real+questions&rnum=5&hl=en#4fa05c8d04b0b552 The link below is another post you can view on transcender's from the user Coffee. http://groups.google.ca/group/alt.certification.mcse/browse_thread/thread/fc929f997a2cbc7b/07825e55337c8266?lnk=st&q=transcender+real+questions&rnum=6&hl=en#07825e55337c8266 I can add more and more posts on this subject regarding Transcender but I will stop here, you can do this research yourself, but I warn you, watch for transcender staff trying to convince you otherwise on the newsgroups. To make a long story short, no one really knows if CertGuard is getting paid off, only they know. It is so funny on how they defend websites that they state are clean when people who have actually ordered from those sites state otherwise. My opinions are expressed below on the whole topic of braindumps and CertGuard: Please feel free to comment on this. 1. Braindumps don't hurt the IT industry. The Hiring Managers Incompetence is what is Hurting the IT industry. What's hurting the IT industry are incompetent hiring managers. When hiring IT staff, it is up to the employer to determine the applicant has the necessary IT skills and knowledge to perform in their job to back up their certification, and not just assume they do simply because they are certified. People who use braindumps and just plain memorize questions are easily detected by any competent hiring manager during the first interview. For example, if we were to compare 2 candidates with a CCNA certification being interviewed for the same job, and lets say one studied via CCNA instructor led classes and books, and the other simply braindumps. During the first interview, the hiring manager would surely ask the candidates some technical questions based on their CCNA assumed knowledge and skills like describe the OSI layers and their functions or something like this. The candidate that only memorized the braindumps to pass the exam would not know how to reply where as the candidate who studied hard would easily be able to answer the question. I know when I was interviewed for my job, I was tested on configuring a Cisco router with NAT, also doing an IOS upgrade on a router, and configuring MPLS on the router. I passed but the manager took extra steps to ensure that I did indeed know what I was talking about. So, what I am saying is to educate managers and companies to test there employee's instead of just assuming that they are good. 2. CertGuard looks to me to support braindump sites, and possibly has a financial interest in their supposed clean list of sites it supports. CertGaurd clearly offers only biased information so take everything you read from any of them carefully, in fact, I would not trust them at all! Reasons they are exploiting the IT industry is because they clearly state certain sites are clean when any newbie to this industry can tell they are not, and also because they are profiting from selling advertising space on their website all in the name of their bogus war on IT Braindumps and cheaters. How do we know if any of them are actually certified? How did they get their certifications? Maybe they bought them from testking? How can we trust a group of online posters who seem to use Nazi-Like rhetoric and Communist type phrases? Don't take my word for it, just check any of their posts and you will surely see this to be the case. Clearly, by simple investigation anyone can see that many of the sites Certguard supports are Braindumps ie. QuickCert.com, Trancender.com, Certways.com, jrksoftware.com etc... Could it be possible that Certguard is receiving some form of financial compensation for their support of these known braindump providers? I would have to say yes since their War on Braindumps etc.. is simply an exploit of this issue for financial gain as they are selling advertising on their website. As we all know, if something sounds too good to be true, it usually is. This has been my experience specifically with Certguard. At first glance, I thought, finally, someone who will actually do something to clean up the IT industry, but after really looking into their website, it seems 100% clear that they have a financial interest in this so called War on Braindumps. I would like to suggest that Robert Williams rename this war to "My War Against Braindump Sites I Am Not Profiting From!" because clearly as you will see below, many of the sites listed on his bogus clean list are actually well know braindumps sites which are probably paying him: - QuickCert.com - They Claim this site is clean: http://www.certguard.com/forums/topic.asp?TID=450 Clearly, this site is not clean because they have a direct link from certifyexpress.com, braindumpcentral.com, braindumps.com, which Certguard knows is a Testking owned website and a well known braindump promoting site as you will see below: On the homepage of certifyexpress.com, you will notice the very top banner advertising for Testking.com, then the one just below it advertising for Quickcert.com, and then there are 3 links for Actual- Exams.com, Testking.com and you guessed it, Quickcert.com. Clearly, you cannot dispute this evidence and clearly, certguard must have some financial interest in promoting quickcert.com. Here is another list from a CertGuard post which lists Braindump free sites: http://www.certguard.com/forums/topic.asp?TID=270 out of this list, there are clearly well KNOWN braindump sites like: Certways.com - a well known braindump site most likely owned by Testking with hosting on the same server as: - Examways.com - Examworx.com jrksoftware.com - a longtime braindump provider using the EasyCert name their homepage clearly states "you will pass the first time guaranteed! In the left menu bar with a pic of a girl jumping for joy. A simple backlink check will show that they have an incoming link from Examblasters.com, which is also another braindump site: http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://www.jrksoftware.com/&hl=en&start=10&sa=N gocertify.com - they claim to be clean, however they have a link on their site for Practice Tests with goes to goexam.com which seems to be their cover to sell braindumps with a Pass Guarantee and 25% - 50% off their products. Transcender.com - They provide a Pass on Your First Try Guarantee and practice tests that contain actual exam questions. I know this firsthand as my best friend used their material about 1 year ago and found this to be the case. Surely not clean and also seems to have an affiliate as listed next. studyexam4less.com/transcender.asp - They also provide braindumps and are well known to be doing this for some time now. They even have their own page outlining the 100% Pass Guarantee here: studyexam4less.com/Transcender-Pass-the-exam-the-first-time- Guarantee.asp certsavvy.com - offers a Pass the First Time Guarantee and is known to provide real exam questions 3. CertGuard is Childish, Immoral and Useless. They seem to always provide Useless info and no help for newcomers to the IT industry and often end up insulting and or threatening your legitimate beginner questions. CertGuard doesn't seem like a group of people I would trust with my career choices so be very careful and think for yourself. Here is a perfect example of what I am talking about: Post Topic: What requirement for MCSE The First Guy posts about the requirements for MCSE but no one other than Birol gives a useful reply. Cerebrus (who works for certguard) and Certguard both give useless, insulting replies and also show just how childish and immoral they are, so how could any one trust what such rude and immoral people say, without doing their own research: http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/898b840717f20934/61957239a6843f67?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=106&hl=en#61957239a6843f67 I would never ever trust my career choices with anything these animals say. They are basically wolves in sheeps clothing, trying to make a buck all while not helping and rudely poking fun at anyone that comes into their path! And if you think I am making this up, just check any of their posts and you will surely see their wolf like attitude speak out loud: This is in addition to what Larry J West has stated about certguard for which I agree 100%: http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcdst/browse_thread/thread/b913082dda4522e6/a6dd48bde6adf5f1?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=76&hl=en#a6dd48bde6adf5f1 Larry States: "You are right that many in the MCNGP / CertGuard group are very childish, rude beyond belief, and in most cases [90% of the time] not very helpful. Their insulting of people for no reason who are trying to help people is truly beyond my comprehension, especially since these are people who are supposedly knowledgeable enough on computers to know that UseNet exists (Not everyone does) and hence have some intelligence. So why did you join them? I think their group's goals of stamping out proxy-testers and braindumps is very laudable, but their actions are just like the outgoing Clinton officials glueing of the "W" keys on government computers - it doesn't show any intelligence, it just shows how childish they are and destroys what credibility they did have. This is a PUBLIC forum - their actions may be fine in their fraternity houses on their college campuses, but not in the real world. Their response to you in not acknowledging that this is a problem (but just criticizing you further) is another sign that they are ignorant and do not understand or care. Until they change, I will not be joining that group, which is a shame, since I too agree with cleaning up the certification mess." Even the criticism of you putting your "MCP" in your signature is a sign that some in the group's leadership deep down don't care about increasing the values of all certifications. They just want to justify their psychological need of putting people down and somehow believe that this is a good method of doing so. I would like to know why you gave them credibility for their actions by joining their group. 4. CertGuard Is not to be Trusted? Just read any of their posts and replies and you will certainly agree that they are offensive, rude, not willing to help and in the end, fraudulent as they claim to provide support for clean sites when they actually support braindump type sites. 5. CertGuard should issue a War on Incompetent Managers. But there is no financial gain in doing that! It is 100% up to the hiring manager to weed out unqualified applicants, in reality, no one cares about braindumps. Because there is no financial gain in this reality, certguard will never come to grips with this and seems to continue to pursue their fake war on cheaters! These are just my opinions made by facts and observations that I have seen and listed with regards to Certguard.com. You make you own decision? I have listed posts below that you can view and see for yourself on this so called CertGuard company: 1. Many arguments that CertGuard may be covering and providing braindumps: http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/5d98421a377bcb3b/9a3a6262b88ed1b1?lnk=st&q=certguard&rnum=2&hl=en#9a3a6262b88ed1b1 2. Exams Required for MCSE -> LarryWestMCSD (5th post down) states that CertGuard is childish, rude and most of all not helpful. This is exactly what we want to say about them in addition to their support of apparent braindump sites and exploiting this War on Braindumps for a profit via website advertising. Below is a quote taken from this post. http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcdst/browse_thread/thread/b913082dda4522e6/a6dd48bde6adf5f1?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=76&hl=en#a6dd48bde6adf5f1 "You are right that many in the MCNGP / CertGuard group are very childish, rude beyond belief, and in most cases [90% of the time] not very helpful. Their insulting of people for no reason who are trying to help people is truly beyond my comprehension, especially since these are people who are supposedly knowledgeable enough on computers to know that UseNet exists (Not everyone does) and hence have some intelligence. So why did you join them? I think their group's goals of stamping out proxy-testers and braindumps is very laudable, but their actions are just like the outgoing Clinton officials glueing of the "W" keys on government computers - it doesn't show any intelligence, it just shows how childish they are and destroys what credibility they did have. This is a PUBLIC forum - their actions may be fine in their fraternity houses on their college campuses, but not in the real world. Their response to you in not acknowledging that this is a problem (but just criticizing you further) is another sign that they are ignorant and do not understand or care. Until they change, I will not be joining that group, which is a shame, since I too agree with cleaning up the certification mess. Even the criticism of you putting your "MCP" in your signature is a sign that some in the group's leadership deep down don't care about increasing the values of all certifications. They just want to justify their psychological need of putting people down and somehow believe that this is a good method of doing so. I would like to know why you gave them credibility for their actions by joining their group. "If you would like to read more about this post, you can view this by clicking on the link below. 3. Transcender Vs. MeasureUp -> the majority of posts here doesn't even cover this topic, instead it is filled with childish and useless posts. http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/898b840717f20934/61957239a6843f67?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=106&hl=en#61957239a6843f67 4. What requirement for MCSE -> First Guy posts about the requirements for MCSE but no one other than Birol gives a useful reply. Cerebrus and CertGuard both give useless, insulting replies and also show just how childish and immoral they are, so how could any moral person trust what they say without their own research: You can view this post below: http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/6586f7bd9e0c052/77d52a5acbd78c0d?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=121&hl=en#77d52a5acbd78c0d I can go on and on but I think I will stop here. Please feel free to post with regards to this information provided and give your views on this topic. Once again, this is just my opinion that certguard actually supports certain websites that provide braindumps and I hope people don't get fooled by this. Cheers!!! Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 214049
  - 2
    - CertGuard - Is it a Scam? You Decide? Hi IT Community, I decided to do some research on this so called www.certguard.com. I see post over post about these braindumps. Well, let me tell you something, I have done some extensive research on this CertGuard company and I warn everybody to make a decision for themselves on this company. CertGuard claims to watch for companies that state you will pass on your first try, any company that offers 100% Pass Guarantee and not a 100% Money Back Guarantee, what is the difference? There is no difference. What seems to be really funny is that my best friend ordered off transcender.com the so called (Reader's Choice Award) and found their questions to be identical to the real exam. So, where does CertGuard go off stating that www.transcender.com and other sites listed on there website are clean when in fact they are not. Every single vendor out there put's real if not very very similar exam questions related to the real exam. You can view the list of the so called CertGuard's clean list below: http://www.certguard.com/reviews.asp Now, you see many companies listed here: "Wonder if these companies are paying for this?" Now, let's look at www.transcender.com the so called (Reader's Choice Award) winner. Which many many people have stated that in fact they do provide the exact questions on there products. According to Certguard.com, CertGuard states to stay away from the below websites that state the below: i. Every website that is owned by TestKing provides braindumps. Yes, it's that obvious! If just ONE of TestKing's websites provides braindumps, ALL of them do. ii. Sites that advertise 'Actual Exam Questions & Answers' are most likely passing off braindumps. iii. Sites that offer a '100% Pass Guarantee on the FIRST try' (most legitimate sites will offer a Money Back Guarantee, but this is completely different than guaranteeing you a passing score.) Make sure you read their Disclaimer before you jump into any commitments. OR ASK US!!!! iv. Access to ALL of their practice exams for X number of dollars is another sign of a braindump, no legitimate corporation can afford to just give away their material for next to nothing. We've seen legitimate practice exam run for as little as $40 or as much as $300 per exam, but we've never seen a legitimate site offer ALL of their Exams in a bundle for such a cheap price. v. Legitimate Practice Exams will generally cost around $100 per CD (or Exam), unless the Test Prep provider is offering a discount, but even then the kits are no less than $50 per CD. If you're looking at buying a bundle of exams for that price, then you're almost sure to be purchasing braindumps. vi. PDFs!! Not every PDF is a braindump, and not every braindump is a PDF, but the odds of getting a PDF that isn't a braindump is pretty rare. DON'T TRUST PDFs!!! Furthermore, you can view more about there guarantee below: http://www.transcender.com/guarantee/ They will refund your purchase the first time if you fail. Now this is just one of the sites I picked on CertGuard's so called clean list. Click also the link below: http://www.transcender.com/dept.aspx?dept%5Fid=100000 You will see an image with a guy jumping with his leg's open, Read what it states: You will Pass the First Time Guarantee. End Of Discussion. (This is the exact wording used on jrksoftware.com, another well known braindump provider) Proof backing up my claim on transcender. Please click the below posts in newsgroups made by people ordering from transcender. http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcad/browse_thread/thread/4740b2d9d62ca55c/a282ee8503baa62f?lnk=st&q=transcender+real+questions&rnum=3&hl=en#a282ee8503baa62f Below is also another post from David Mickelson stating that Microsoft does not support transcender. http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd/browse_thread/thread/84123cf7f578717f/4fa05c8d04b0b552?lnk=st&q=transcender+real+questions&rnum=5&hl=en#4fa05c8d04b0b552 "Yes. I did some looking back to may 28th. Here's one gentleman from Microsoft (not part of the MS Cert Team) stating they are cheat sheets. I followed it with my response. I believe it happened one other time with a leader from the Microsoft Cert team a month or two later but cannot find it. " Davin Mickelson Message 3 in thread From: Davin (a...@b.com) Subject: Re: Want to Buy Transcender 70-306 View this article only Newsgroups: Microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd Date: 2003-05-28 14:26:38 PST Hi. I find it interesting that Scott considers one of MCP Magazine's (magazine is owned and controlled by Microsoft) top sponsors as a "cheat sheet" provider. I was under the assumption that Transcender was not a Microsoft Certified Practice Test Provider (MCPTP) because of their choice not to pay Microsoft for the advertising/sales leads from the MS "TrainCert" web site. http://www.microsoft.com/traincert/mcpexams/prepare/practicetests.asp I don't know the facts. I don't work for either company. Davin Mickelson "Scott Moore [MSFT]" <scott...@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message news:eu9EHpUJDHA.336@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl... > Legitimate use of Transcender is sort of an oxymoron. They are cheat > sheets, and MS doesn't endorse them at all. > Scott Moore > Microsoft Corp. - OEM Mobile Devices TAM The link below is another post you can view on transcender's from the user Coffee. http://groups.google.ca/group/alt.certification.mcse/browse_thread/thread/fc929f997a2cbc7b/07825e55337c8266?lnk=st&q=transcender+real+questions&rnum=6&hl=en#07825e55337c8266 (I apologize for posting this twice I wanted it to be a new thread - you can also find this same message under "Re: TRANSCENDER OFFICALS BEING NOSY IN THIS NEWSGROUP...") You know I like the Transcenders - I have both purchased and been given them to use. I also agree with what is said about Braindumps to a degree. I think that a Braindump would be useful and should be comments from someone who has taken the tests but they shouldn't actually disclose the questions (or their wrong answers). So heres my question - Why is it that we feel so justified in Slamming the likes of Cheet-sheets and in the same breath defend Transcenders? This is a legitimate question (IOW I am not trying to be cute). Transcender questions a frighteningly close to the real questions so we know the research is done in the same way that the likes of Braindumps and Cheet-sheets -- why is it that we like to defend them just because they have been doing it longer -- WHY THIS WOULD BE UN-MICROSOFT OF US! I am very interested in you comments and thoughts on this - it seems to be a double standard and I am going to get a kick out of you trying to defend it. Coffee. I can add more and more posts on this subject regarding Transcender but I will stop here, you can do this research yourself, but I warn you, watch for transcender staff trying to convince you otherwise on the newsgroups. To make a long story short, no one really knows if CertGuard is getting paid off, only they know. It is so funny on how they defend websites that they state are clean when people who have actually ordered from those sites state otherwise. My opinions are expressed below on the whole topic of braindumps and CertGuard: Please feel free to comment on this. 1. Braindumps don't hurt the IT industry. The Hiring Managers Incompetence is what is Hurting the IT industry. What's hurting the IT industry are incompetent hiring managers. When hiring IT staff, it is up to the employer to determine the applicant has the necessary IT skills and knowledge to perform in their job to back up their certification, and not just assume they do simply because they are certified. People who use braindumps and just plain memorize questions are easily detected by any competent hiring manager during the first interview. For example, if we were to compare 2 candidates with a CCNA certification being interviewed for the same job, and lets say one studied via CCNA instructor led classes and books, and the other simply braindumps. During the first interview, the hiring manager would surely ask the candidates some technical questions based on their CCNA assumed knowledge and skills like describe the OSI layers and their functions or something like this. The candidate that only memorized the braindumps to pass the exam would not know how to reply where as the candidate who studied hard would easily be able to answer the question. I know when I was interviewed for my job, I was tested on configuring a Cisco router with NAT, also doing an IOS upgrade on a router, and configuring MPLS on the router. I passed but the manager took extra steps to ensure that I did indeed know what I was talking about. So, what I am saying is to educate managers and companies to test there employee's instead of just assuming that they are good. 2. CertGuard looks to me to support braindump sites, and possibly has a financial interest in their supposed clean list of sites it supports. CertGaurd clearly offers only biased information so take everything you read from any of them carefully, in fact, I would not trust them at all! Reasons they are exploiting the IT industry is because they clearly state certain sites are clean when any newbie to this industry can tell they are not, and also because they are profiting from selling advertising space on their website all in the name of their bogus war on IT Braindumps and cheaters. How do we know if any of them are actually certified? How did they get their certifications? Maybe they bought them from testking? How can we trust a group of online posters who seem to use Nazi-Like rhetoric and Communist type phrases? Don't take my word for it, just check any of their posts and you will surely see this to be the case. Clearly, by simple investigation anyone can see that many of the sites Certguard supports are Braindumps ie. QuickCert.com, Trancender.com, Certways.com, jrksoftware.com etc... Could it be possible that Certguard is receiving some form of financial compensation for their support of these known braindump providers? I would have to say yes since their War on Braindumps etc.. is simply an exploit of this issue for financial gain as they are selling advertising on their website. As we all know, if something sounds too good to be true, it usually is. This has been my experience specifically with Certguard. At first glance, I thought, finally, someone who will actually do something to clean up the IT industry, but after really looking into their website, it seems 100% clear that they have a financial interest in this so called War on Braindumps. I would like to suggest that Robert Williams rename this war to "My War Against Braindump Sites I Am Not Profiting From!" because clearly as you will see below, many of the sites listed on his bogus clean list are actually well know braindumps sites which are probably paying him: - QuickCert.com - They Claim this site is clean: http://www.certguard.com/forums/topic.asp?TID=450 Clearly, this site is not clean because they have a direct link from certifyexpress.com, braindumpcentral.com, braindumps.com, which Certguard knows is a Testking owned website and a well known braindump promoting site as you will see below: On the homepage of certifyexpress.com, you will notice the very top banner advertising for Testking.com, then the one just below it advertising for Quickcert.com, and then there are 3 links for Actual- Exams.com, Testking.com and you guessed it, Quickcert.com. Clearly, you cannot dispute this evidence and clearly, certguard must have some financial interest in promoting quickcert.com. Here is another list from a CertGuard post which lists Braindump free sites: http://www.certguard.com/forums/topic.asp?TID=270 out of this list, there are clearly well KNOWN braindump sites like: Certways.com - a well known braindump site most likely owned by Testking with hosting on the same server as: - Examways.com - Examworx.com jrksoftware.com - a longtime braindump provider using the EasyCert name their homepage clearly states "you will pass the first time guaranteed! In the left menu bar with a pic of a girl jumping for joy. A simple backlink check will show that they have an incoming link from Examblasters.com, which is also another braindump site: http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://www.jrksoftware.com/&hl=en&start=10&sa=N gocertify.com - they claim to be clean, however they have a link on their site for Practice Tests with goes to goexam.com which seems to be their cover to sell braindumps with a Pass Guarantee and 25% - 50% off their products. Transcender.com - They provide a Pass on Your First Try Guarantee and practice tests that contain actual exam questions. I know this firsthand as my best friend used their material about 1 year ago and found this to be the case. Surely not clean and also seems to have an affiliate as listed next. studyexam4less.com/transcender.asp - They also provide braindumps and are well known to be doing this for some time now. They even have their own page outlining the 100% Pass Guarantee here: studyexam4less.com/Transcender-Pass-the-exam-the-first-time- Guarantee.asp certsavvy.com - offers a Pass the First Time Guarantee and is known to provide real exam questions 3. CertGuard is Childish, Immoral and Useless. They seem to always provide Useless info and no help for newcomers to the IT industry and often end up insulting and or threatening your legitimate beginner questions. CertGuard doesn't seem like a group of people I would trust with my career choices so be very careful and think for yourself. Here is a perfect example of what I am talking about: Post Topic: What requirement for MCSE The First Guy posts about the requirements for MCSE but no one other than Birol gives a useful reply. Cerebrus (who works for certguard) and Certguard both give useless, insulting replies and also show just how childish and immoral they are, so how could any one trust what such rude and immoral people say, without doing their own research: http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/898b840717f20934/61957239a6843f67?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=106&hl=en#61957239a6843f67 CertGuard Wrote: > JJ Gitties wrote : >> you need to buy arab/english dictionary. > No, he doesn't. BTW, your name sounds very similar to somethings that > I like very much ! :P LMAO...I presume you mean DD Titties...I thought the same damb thing when he walked in. ...and I'll bet every damb one of us old pervs here did. ;) Cerebrus Wrote: > LMAO...I presume you mean DD Titties...I thought the same damb thing when he > walked in. > ...and I'll bet every damb one of us old pervs here did. ;) Holy cow ! Not you too ! :P I would never every trust my career choices with anything these animals say. They are basically wolves in sheeps clothing, trying to make a buck all while not helping and rudely poking fun at anyone that comes into their path! And if you think I am making this up, just check any of their posts and you will surely see their wolf like attitude speak out loud: This is in addition to what Larry J West has stated about certguard for which I agree 100%: http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcdst/browse_thread/thread/b913082dda4522e6/a6dd48bde6adf5f1?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=76&hl=en#a6dd48bde6adf5f1 Larry States: You are right that many in the MCNGP / CertGuard group are very childish, rude beyond belief, and in most cases [90% of the time] not very helpful. Their insulting of people for no reason who are trying to help people is truly beyond my comprehension, especially since these are people who are supposedly knowledgeable enough on computers to know that UseNet exists (Not everyone does) and hence have some intelligence. So why did you join them? I think their group's goals of stamping out proxy-testers and braindumps is very laudable, but their actions are just like the outgoing Clinton officials glueing of the "W" keys on government computers - it doesn't show any intelligence, it just shows how childish they are and destroys what credibility they did have. This is a PUBLIC forum - their actions may be fine in their fraternity houses on their college campuses, but not in the real world. Their response to you in not acknowledging that this is a problem (but just criticizing you further) is another sign that they are ignorant and do not understand or care. Until they change, I will not be joining that group, which is a shame, since I too agree with cleaning up the certification mess. Even the criticism of you putting your "MCP" in your signature is a sign that some in the group's leadership deep down don't care about increasing the values of all certifications. They just want to justify their psychological need of putting people down and somehow believe that this is a good method of doing so. I would like to know why you gave them credibility for their actions by joining their group. 4. CertGuard Is not to be Trusted? Just read any of their posts and replies and you will certainly agree that they are offensive, rude, not willing to help and in the end, fraudulent as they claim to provide support for clean sites when they actually support braindump type sites. 5. CertGuard should issue a War on Incompetent Managers. But there is no financial gain in doing that! It is 100% up to the hiring manager to weed out unqualified applicants, in reality, no one cares about braindumps. Because there is no financial gain in this reality, certguard will never come to grips with this and seems to continue to pursue their fake war on cheaters! These are just my opinions made by facts and observations that I have seen and listed with regards to Certguard.com. You make you own decision? I have listed posts below that you can view and see for yourself on this so called CertGuard company: 1. Many arguments that CertGuard may be covering and providing braindumps: http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/5d98421a377bcb3b/9a3a6262b88ed1b1?lnk=st&q=certguard&rnum=2&hl=en#9a3a6262b88ed1b1 2. Exams Required for MCSE -> LarryWestMCSD (5th post down) states that CertGuard is childish, rude and most of all not helpful. This is exactly what we want to say about them in addition to their support of apparent braindump sites and exploiting this War on Braindumps for a profit via website advertising. Below is a quote taken from this post. http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcdst/browse_thread/thread/b913082dda4522e6/a6dd48bde6adf5f1?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=76&hl=en#a6dd48bde6adf5f1 "You are right that many in the MCNGP / CertGuard group are very childish, rude beyond belief, and in most cases [90% of the time] not very helpful. Their insulting of people for no reason who are trying to help people is truly beyond my comprehension, especially since these are people who are supposedly knowledgeable enough on computers to know that UseNet exists (Not everyone does) and hence have some intelligence. So why did you join them? I think their group's goals of stamping out proxy-testers and braindumps is very laudable, but their actions are just like the outgoing Clinton officials glueing of the "W" keys on government computers - it doesn't show any intelligence, it just shows how childish they are and destroys what credibility they did have. This is a PUBLIC forum - their actions may be fine in their fraternity houses on their college campuses, but not in the real world. Their response to you in not acknowledging that this is a problem (but just criticizing you further) is another sign that they are ignorant and do not understand or care. Until they change, I will not be joining that group, which is a shame, since I too agree with cleaning up the certification mess. Even the criticism of you putting your "MCP" in your signature is a sign that some in the group's leadership deep down don't care about increasing the values of all certifications. They just want to justify their psychological need of putting people down and somehow believe that this is a good method of doing so. I would like to know why you gave them credibility for their actions by joining their group. "If you would like to read more about this post, you can view this by clicking on the link below. 3. Transcender Vs. MeasureUp -> the majority of posts here doesn't even cover this topic, instead it is filled with childish and useless posts. http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/898b840717f20934/61957239a6843f67?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=106&hl=en#61957239a6843f67 4. What requirement for MCSE -> First Guy posts about the requirements for MCSE but no one other than Birol gives a useful reply. Cerebrus and CertGuard both give useless, insulting replies and also show just how childish and immoral they are, so how could any moral person trust what they say without their own research: CertGuard Wrote: > JJ Gitties wrote : >> you need to buy arab/english dictionary. > No, he doesn't. BTW, your name sounds very similar to somethings that > I like very much ! :P LMAO...I presume you mean DD Titties...I thought the same damb thing when he walked in. ...and I'll bet every damb one of us old pervs here did. ;) Cerebrus Wrote: > LMAO...I presume you mean DD Titties...I thought the same damb thing when he > walked in. > ...and I'll bet every damb one of us old pervs here did. ;) Holy cow ! Not you too ! :P You can view this post below: http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/6586f7bd9e0c052/77d52a5acbd78c0d?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=121&hl=en#77d52a5acbd78c0d I can go on and on but I think I will stop here. Please feel free to post with regards to this information provided and give your views on this topic. Once again, this is just my opinion that certguard actually supports certain websites that provide braindumps and I hope people don't get fooled by this. Cheers!!! Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 214047
  - 3
    - Hi All need some advice Hi all I have been pondering about doing my MCP 70-290 2003 Server, I user 2003 every day and have done my A+ and CCNA and started doing my 2000 MCP but never got time to finish it Can any one recommend a good self study kit. I hear many mixed things about the Microsoft kits but i need something that I can really get my teeth stuck into. Also does anyone know of any of the good online test sites that mirror the MCP tests ? Im looking to put my every day practice to the test and see what I can do. Cheers Ethan Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 214037
  - 4
    - 70-284 Exam Format I have not seen as posting on this board as to the test format of 70-284. Are there only test questions or does it include simulations. -- ray3d84 Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 214035
  - 5
    - Which way is better ? Hello everybody, I am an MCSA 2003 certified i would like to have an expert advice about where should i go next? should i complete MCSE or ... etc, there are so many Choices. I really like all the new technology but i have an error :D i don't know any programming language. Could i get some help ?.. Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 214026
  - 6
    - All new updates at Allitcertkiller.com than Testking.co.uk All new updates at Allitcertkiller.com than Testking.co.uk Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 214022
  - 7
    - Could this be where it all starts?? The headline reads: Schools say iPods becoming tool for cheaters. You'd think it was regarding certification tests, or even college exams, but nope... http://www.cnn.com/2007/EDUCATION/04/27/ipod.cheating.ap/index.html?eref=rss_offbeat Should those be the people we (read CertGuard) need to be focusing our efforts on? How do you get a point across to kids that weren't raised properly to begin with? -- CertGuard Get the new 'No Braindump' CertGear http://www.cafepress.com/certguard Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 214015
  - 8
    - MCP site access I have just passed one MCSE exam, how can I get further information to access the MCP member site? Will MSFT send an e-mail to me later regarding this matter? Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 214013
  - 9
    - MCP Imposters I've come across a couple of folks in my district who I am almost sure are MCP and MCSE imposters. As someone who is an MCP I find this trickery unacceptable. How can I check their status (MCP) and what do i do about it? Does MS follow up on this sort of thing? Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 214001
  - 10
    - Unemployed? Got that ol' MCSE and still can't find a j-o-b? Me, too. Click on over to http://www.unemployedmcse.com and bitch and complain all you want. It'll make ME feel better, and it'll make YOU feel better, too. You would THINK, anyway. Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213983
  - 11
    - OT: A website truly worthy of your time... While you, the atypical MCNGP criminal, are sitting here wasting company time, stealing from your employer by posting messages that have no relevance to anything (and looking over your shoulder in case he or she is watching), you are missing out on an amazing world of beauty and feminity that has been right under your nose all along... It's... a travesty! http://fatwonderwoman.blogspot.com/ Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213976
  - 12
    - Must Read An excellent resource on ISA Server providing in depth knowledge of configuration, bypassing proxy service, filtering cache entries, disabling traffic and much more. Worth reading!! http://www.it-techexperts.com/MCSE/MCSEISA.asp Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213968
  - 13
    - 70-290 Exam. Hi.. All Iam planning to take my 70-290 Exam in the month of May.. Pls let me know if any nice offers is going on for the time being. now... Tks Sunil Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213967
  - 14
    - OT: Recommendation on Imaging Software Suffice to say I am out of the loop with drive imaging software nowadays. I am doing research on the major brands on the market, but wanted your feedback on what you use -- advantages / disadvantages. Situation: 4 PC SMB that requires very minimal downtime due to its promised deadlines. I need imaging software that will restore the PC back to its original state before the failure. This software also needs to perform a daily snapshot (image backup) automatically. Any recommendation? -- Michael D. Alligood, MCSA, MCDST The I.T. Classroom - http://www.theitclassroom.com/ CertGuard - http://www.certguard.com Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213956
  - 15
    - OT: Tuesday Titilation A Treasure Trove of Golden Poastings: http://groups.google.com/groups?wp_ml=0&as_q=&num=10&scoring=r&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=Vigo+Breadcrumbs&lr=lang_en&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=24&as_maxm=4&as_maxy=2007&safe=off http://tinyurl.com/276cgy?wp_ml=0 Because I'm too impatient to wait for Neil to post them all on the sekrit web site. COME BACK UNCLE VIGO! I wonder if the dot communists won. Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213949
  - 16
    - OT: A star is born Tomorrow we will be invaded by a production crew filming "Yellow Handkerchief" starring William Hurt. http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0954990/ They hired our parking lot (for $500) to set up a catering tent which I and my fellow employees have been invited to have full access to. Free breakfast and lunch, and a chance to get discovered. They're filming at Dot's Diner which is just behind our building and they needed a lot of extra space for their stuff. Now if I could just figure out how to get an MCNGP sign stuck up somewhere... Anyway, if anyone has something they want me to as Bill, I mean Mr Hurt, let me know. I'm sure he'll invite me to play golf or fly in his Gulfstream, you know. 0x22 Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213939
  - 17
    - Re: Found out MCSE will be faced out in 2008. whats the alternative th On Apr 24, 6:24 am, Neil <guess...@gmail.com> wrote: > FINE! there are 4 on the stupers3krut site. under teh "Best of" Thankee from the bottom of my heart. May the "breadcrumbs" help you find your way to salvation ! Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213926
  - 18
    - OT: Exams Scheduled for Discontinuation published... http://www.microsoft.com/learning/mcpexams/status/examstoretire.mspx -- Michael D. Alligood, MCSA, MCDST The I.T. Classroom - http://www.theitclassroom.com/ CertGuard - http://www.certguard.com Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213907
  - 19
    - how many case studies on the 70-297 exam ? Hi im planning on taking the 70-297 exam this week and i would like to know how many case studies or questions i should expect and how much time is given Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213879
  - 20
    - how many case studies on the 70-297 exam ? Hi im planning on taking the 70-97 exam this week and i would like to know how many case studies or questions i should expect and how much time is given Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213878
  - 21
    - MCSA/MCSE 2000 -> 2003 Greetings everyone, A couple of years ago I had taken and passed both 70-210, 70-215, and also have my A+ and Network+ Certifications. This of course means that I am 1 test (70-218) away from my MCSA in Windows 2000. This is where the tricky part begins. I want to convert this ultimately into an MCSE 2003 without de-valueing the 210,215, and 218 exams. This means, I don't want to take the equivalents for the 2003 exam if I don't have to. I could go the "upgrade track" for MCSA in 2000 to 2003, but does it "stop there" meaning, in order to be considered an MCSE 2003, do I need to take and pass all of the specifically required exams? Or after I upgrade from MCSA 2000 to 2003, can I continue on to the 2003 MCSE track? -- Michael Cramer A+/Net+ Certified Technician Future MCSA 2003 Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213875
  - 22
    - All new exams and updates at Testking.co.uk with moneyback guarantee All new exams and updates at Testking.co.uk with moneyback guarantee Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213874
  - 23
    - Online Simulation Exams FREE Demos Check out: www.wswexams.com Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213864
  - 24
    - OT: And you thought it was just the french ? This is real funny ! (Turn your speakers on) <http://tcc.itc.it/people/rocchi/fun/europe.html> SFW. Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213859
  - 25
    - Semi-OT: Braindumps on TV Anyone happen to catch ER last nght? I rarely watch it, but I did last night. At one point, while in the emergency room working on a patient, John Stamos' character says to Mekhi Phifer's character, "I'll see if I can get your brother a copy of last year's EMT exam." (paraphrasing) So, the question I pose to my fellow members: Are you with me in boycotting NBC, for allowing such a travesty to occur during primetime? I wouldn't be so upset if this was a late-night comedy. But it's a primetime drama. Millions of people saw this, and now they could potentially think this is the right thing to do. Please join me in boycotting NBC. Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213830
- Next
  - 1
    - Found out MCSE will be faced out in 2008. whats the alternative th am interested in going into IT by taking a course in MCSE and getting certified but i found out MCSE will be faced out in 2008. can someone please let me know what alternative certification is out there which is equivalent to the MCSE. Thanks Jay. Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213829
  - 2
    - OT: it's all in the translation racism - yet another side effect of outsourcing http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,267184,00.html Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213812
  - 3
    - Practise Exams Can anyone tell me where I can obtain couple of Exam 70-284 practice questions for free? Any help will be greatly appreciated Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213805
  - 4
    - Canadian Deal - Feedback requested I found this one the MS site. Nice to see a deal for Canadians, instead of US only. It looks like a pretty good deal! What does everyone else think? $649 Cdn. I have heard you will not be able to upgrade to Longhorn from 2000, MS is going to orphan it like they did NT Certs. What do you get? . Access to Microsoft eLearning courses: 2274, 2275, 2277 . Live Tutor to coach you through every step of your learning and study plan . Exam preparation for exam # 70-292 . Free exam voucher . Personal learning guide to maximize your online training experience . 40% off of your "Longhorn" upgrade exam (If your MCSA, Windows Server 2003 credentials are completed by June 30th, 2007) http://www.microsoft.com/canada/learning/mcp/upgrade/ws2003/default.mspx Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213800
  - 5
    - Obtain MCSE 2003 Without Exams( MCP + MCSA 2003 Free) 100% Passing Gaurantee.!!!! hi friends if anyone need to clear MCSE,MCSA,MCDBA,MCSD,MCSD.NET,CCNA,CCNP,A+,N +,SECURITY+Without exams and study.. we will give the exams on ur bahalf..make u pass in that and charge some extra amount from u.. Then here the search END.. Benifits:- 1. No need to Give EXAMS by Urself. 2. Need not to go on any testing site to give exams. 3. 100% Passing Gaurantee. 4. U have to pay US after checking ur results online. 5. Got certifications at ur Doorstep. Things we Need from the candidates :- 1. Their full name ( that he need to appear on his scoresheet and certificate). 2. Their Full address ( for certificaiton De;ivery) 3. Their Passport And Driving liciense colour scan copy(as photo id proof) 4. Cell as well as landline number with country code 5. Correct exam numbers( that candidates want to do) procedure :- Provide us ur these detials then we will sit on our own several testing site (vue and prometric both) do ur exams and then send u ur scorehseets..by using that scoresheet u will easily able to check ur result online...and when u will check ur results...only then u have to send us payment. No Payment in advance required..but in the case of microsoft exams only.. for other tests candidate need to send us half payment in advance.. prices :- Microsoft any exam :- 400 usd ccna :- 999 usd ccnp :- 1200 usd each exam comptia A+ :- 1400 usd each exam comptia net+ :- 1300 usd comptia security + = 1300 usd Citrix each exam :- 1000 usd sap each exam :- 1200 usd oracle 9i :- 3400 usd oracle 10g :- 4800 ussd Microsoft Business Solution each exam :-1500usd(including exam fee) contact info :- mail us at :- all_certs@yahoo.com Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213794
  - 6
    - OT: CompTIA exams as electives for the MCSA 2000 Apologize for blasting this in all certification newsgroups, but I cannot remember where this question originated from -- or who asked it. But I promised to look into it and get an answer. The question was concerning the MCSA 2000 electives and why it changed from Network+ and A+ combo to Server+ and A+ combo. After speaking with Rob Linsky, Product Manager of I.T. Certification for Microsoft, this is an error on the website. The Network+ and A+ combo still counts as an elective for the MCSA 2000 certification. -- Michael D. Alligood, MCSA, MCDST The I.T. Classroom - http://www.theitclassroom.com/ CertGuard - http://www.certguard.com Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213792
  - 7
    - Realexamquestions.com with real exam questions study guides Realexamquestions.com with real exam questions study guides Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213767
  - 8
    - Allitcertkiller.co.uk exams only for $15 for limited period with moneyback guarantee Allitcertkiller.co.uk exams only for $15 for limited period with moneyback guarantee Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213766
  - 9
    - Need MCSE Book I am intending to start my MCSE exam preparation and live in Sydney, Australia. If any one has book to sell out, please contact me at the following email address or number imran_ilm5@hotmail.com 0432073698 Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213760
  - 10
    - Exam options ? I have today, passed 70-219 W2000 AD Infrastucture Admin. Over the last few months I have passed 70-215, 70-210, 70-218, 70-216, 70-229, 70-228. This give me MCSA 2000 and a MCDBA 2000. I am now looking at doing a design exam (to complete the MCSE) but haven't a clue which one to do. I want to maximise my certs so I am leaning towards 70-220 (Designing W2000 Security) because it will be useful for the MCSA\MCSE 2000 Security accreditation. My next step (after the design exam) however, is to upgrade the MCSA/MCSE to 2003. Can anyone tell me if I upgrade to MCSE 2003 will a MCSE 2000 Security accreditation be upgraded to. Also if I finish the MCSE with 70-220, then upgrade, can I just do the one exam to make it a MCSE 2000 Security ? I can't find this info on the MS Website. Thanks Richard Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213753
  - 11
    - RRAS: need explanation for a question from the 70-291 MSPress book Hello, Can anyone please explain me the answer from the MSPress Book 70-291 (page 9-84) for the following question: "You have deployed a Windows Server 2003 computer running the Routing And Remote Access Service router to function as a simple firewall. How many packet filters do you need to create to support remote access to a VPN server through L2TP/IPSec? Assume that you want to provide the strictest security standards." Answer: Twelve Thanks a lot for your answers Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213748
  - 12
    - Looking for MCPs to link to my company Hello fellow Microsoft test takers. I have a growing IT Consulting company in Manhattan and am trying to advance my Microsoft partnership status. To do that I need a couple of MCPs or MCSEs. I'm ramping up to start growing this business in July, so if you would let me tie your MCP number to my company I would consider you for work in the future. Right now I don't have any extra work, but hopefully during the summer I will need lots of help. Or if your number isn't linked to another company and you just want to help, it would be much appreciated. Let me know if your interested, Kacey Fern, MCSE INTERLiNK TECHNOLOGIES kfern@interlinktechnologies.com Linking Technology between the World and You www.interlinktechnologies.com Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213736
  - 13
    - New updates at Allitcertkiller.com than Testking.co.uk with 100% passing guarantee New updates at Allitcertkiller.com than Testking.co.uk with 100% passing guarantee Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213728
  - 14
    - FREE Simulation Exams Online Check out: www.wswexams.com Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213726
  - 15
    - Great MCSE resource site A great site for networking type courses. i.e mcse, cisco, a+, etc www.mcmcse.com Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213725
  - 16
    - OT: Integrity in Microsoft Certification and the NDA webcast. After many talks with Trika at Microsoft Corporation, it has been decided that providing a webcast concerning the integrity in Microsoft certification and demystifying the NDA would be a great starting point in understand what Microsoft is doing in this area. CertGuard (Robert Williams), Mitch Garvis, and myself will assist Trika and other Microsoft employees who specialize in this topic of conversation with 2 sessions followed by a Q&A session. The date for this event is still tentative, but as of this moment it scheduled for May 23rd. Further information, and possible changes to the date, will be made available to these newsgroups when they are finalized. It has been my goal to help you guys with your studies any way I can. By pushing for this webcast, I hope that a majority of your questions get answered by the correct people. If you have any questions or comments about this upcoming event, please feel free to post them here or email me directly. Michael D. Alligood, MCSA, MCDST The I.T. Classroom - http://www.theitclassroom.com/ CertGuard - http://www.certguard.com Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213716
  - 17
    - I'm enraged I have written and published a new post for those interested. Continue reading if you find yourself in that category. I just came across this message on the Prometric website (http://www.prometric.com/Microsoft/default.htm): Note: As of April 1, 2007, only citizens of India will be permitted to register for exams in our India test centers, and only citizens of China will be permitted to register for exams in our Mainland China test centers. If you have any questions, please contact Microsoft at mlsecure@microsoft.com This is not acceptable. One of my favorite things to do was to take my Microsoft exams in China or India. It was my way of mixing business with pleasure. This move by Microsoft will now force me to take my exams at a testing center a few miles from my work. This is just another attempt to punish those persons who love the Chinese and Indian people. You get two big thumbs down from me Microsoft. Death from Above Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213704
  - 18
    - OT: Steps to Certification Success Article I have written and published a new article for those interested. It is a step by step process that will greatly assist you in your certification journey as well as day to day activities. Please feel free to contact me with your comments. I can be reached at Michael@theitclassroom.com Please take the time to read "The Seven Steps to Certification Success" at http://www.certguard.com/Seven-Steps-to-Certification-Success.asp -- Michael D. Alligood, MCSA, MCDST The I.T. Classroom - http://www.theitclassroom.com/ CertGuard - http://www.certguard.com Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213700
  - 19
    - OT: Yet another excuse for you to call me crazy... Every once in a while, I type strange, potentially humorous, potentially weird things on a keyboard... and the words emerge on a device and are rendered on a square, transmitted to the world. I do this to reinforce my ego, which is oh so fragile, it requires constant reinforcement... I need to feel like part of a group to overcome my feelings of inadequacy. I never read what people say about it, I just assume, rightly so, that everyone agrees with me, that I am right, and cooler than they are. I do this once weekly, but not with any particular regularity. Of course, there are those who do so... DAILY.... "Consultant" <consultant_mcngp@yahoo.com> wrote > again, i throw up in my mouth Yes, please do. "Consultant" <consultant_mcngp@yahoo.com> wrote > again, i throw up in my mouth I hope you like the taste of spaghetti sauce, gravy, gristle, and lint. "Consultant" <consultant_mcngp@yahoo.com> wrote > again, i throw up in my mouth Hmm... Tomorrow, try bologna, orange juice, toothpaste, and then lick a 9 volt battery. "Consultant" <consultant_mcngp@yahoo.com> wrote > again, i throw up in my mouth DON'T LET THIS HAPPEN TO YOU! RUN AWAY FROM THE MCNGP, OR YOU WILL BE FORCED TO SWALLOW YOUR OWN BILE REPEATEDLY! Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213672
  - 20
    - OT Wednesday Funny ok, these are pretty funny http://forums.fark.com/cgi/fark/comments.pl?IDLink=2732770 enjoy c Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213666
  - 21
    - prepare for MCSE exam . Hi, I'm a new comer in this group . I want to prepare for MCSE exam,but I don't know do I need any work experience for pass the exams?? for example at least 2 years.Is it possible that I start to study it books without some classrooms training ?? my native language isn't English ,but I'm a student in the computer science. Please help me what I have to do to prepare the MCSE exams . Regard , Elham Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213640
  - 22
    - OT: C, my thoughts are with you It's very sad. I heard the news last night. Let me be the first to offer my sincere condolences. I'm so sorry you're not the baby daddy. Be strong. I know it doesn't look like it now, but tomorrow will be a better day. Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213638
  - 23
    - OT: Browser and OS stats I love statistics. http://www.w3schools.com/browsers/browsers_stats.asp Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213590
  - 24
    - Part 2 of the Series I'm writing... Well, here it is...Part deux! The cheating industry that is devaluing IT certification - part two http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/13646 These are the other links I posted from the Part 1 post, in case ya missed 'em. ;-) http://www.networkworld.com/subnets/cisco/ This is part 1 of the article: http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/13341 Some other useful links: Home: http://www.CertGuard.com Forums: http://www.CertGuard.com/forums/ Braindumps: http://www.CertGuard.com/braindumps.asp Practice Test Providers: http://www.CertGuard.com/reviews.asp Study Materials and Books: http://www.CertGuard.com/store.asp Vendor Links and Emails: http://www.CertGuard.com/links.asp -- CertGuard You think you know IT?!?! Check out the new 'No Braindump' CertGear: http://www.cafepress.com/certguard <-- we sell Thongs!! Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213585
  - 25
    - OT: I've got to Wii I mean I just got a Wii. Well, my son and his gf just got a Wii, but there're using my big screen TV and mega-watt sound system, so they let me play with it every once in a while. I'm torn. If I wanted to do all that physical activity I would just play real ping-pong. I think MCSE tests, however, could benefit from this technology. Using a Wii-mote could add a whole new aspect to simulation style questions. I mean, sometimes you just want to bang on the server with a hammer, or slap that luser in the back of the haed. Just saying. Tag: Part IV of the Series I'm writing Tag: 213569

This is what it's all about! Our final installment of "The cheating industry
that is devaluing IT certification". This one is all about the Gunmen.

We're hoping to provide you with more in the future.

Enjoy the reading, comments are encouraged.
http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/14695

Previous Installments
Part 1: http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/13341
Part 2: http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/13646
Part 3: http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/14403

--
CertGuard
You think you know IT?!?!
CertGear: http://www.cafepress.com/certguard

Top