>Alright, I'm not going to flame you, as I am wont to do. Because it
seems
>you're asking a genuine question, not knowing the answer, as opposed to
>trying to sway us into believing that TestKings are good. Here's the
skinny:
>
>TestKing, Actualtest, and any derivitave thereof ARE actual exam
questions.
>And they DO come from Microsoft - but not legally. What happens is
these
>idiots pay people to take the tests and write down the questions, word
for
>word, and what they think is the answer. Then they publish these,
trying to
>prey on peoples' greed. There is no simpler way to say it: This is
cheating.
Many thanks for the lucid intelligent reply. I am not trying to cheat
and have no need to. When I attained a BSc from London University
years ago that "revered institution" sold their own exam papers from
previous years and probably still does. Does this not happen
Stateside? That is all I am asking for - how can reading past papers
be cheating? I have it on good advice that half the struggle with MS
exams is grappling with the devious way in which the questions are
composed, not the material itself.
And yes I have read study guides, user manuals and gained years of
experience in IT. This is not the first time I have come across
posters who make rash and rapid assumptions about people - did I say
Testking were any good?
That's three questions in this post BTW but I don't think its me
that's wasting space here
OK fourth one - if these cowboys are selling answers written down by
paid "sitters" is that why so many of the answers in their prodcuts
are crap or at best highly debatable?!
Thus he spake: " who climbs a hill without first knowing how steep is
the hill?". Does a rhetorical question count? I'm losing count here.
(Answer: A Turtle)
Honest Joe