Paul
Sun Feb 01 13:26:28 CST 2004
If I understand you correctly, are you suggesting to do the MCSA upgrade
(70-292) and then just do the remaining MCSE 2003 exam requirements? I want
to have solid knowledge of both 2000 and 2003. If I went that route wouldn't
I be missing some core 2000 stuff, like 70-217, or does the 2003 material
cover both 2000 foundation as well as the new 2003 functionality?
"SpookyNerd" <spookynerd@anonymous.com> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.02.01.18.15.56.340673@anonymous.com...
> You could also do this:
>
> MCSA 2000 > MCSA 2003 > MCSE 2003
>
> As far as I know, once you have an MCSA in 2003, you just need to
> take the remaining 4 exams for the MCSE; that is 2 core, 1 design,
> and 1 elective.
>
http://www.microsoft.com/learning/mcp/mcse/windows2003/mcsa.asp
>
> Chris
>
> On Sun, 01 Feb 2004 10:56:27 -0600, Paul wrote:
>
> > I'm a 70-216 exam away from an MCSA 2000. My goal is MCSA 2003 as well
as
> > MCSE 2003. Should the order in which this is done be:
> >
> > MCSA 2000> MCSA 2003 upgrade> MCSE 2000> MCSE 2003 upgrade
> >
> > or
> >
> > MCSA 2000> MCSE 2000> MCSA 2003 upgrade> MCSE 2003 upgrade
> >
> > My concern is that if I do the MCSA 2003 upgrade right after the MCSA
2000,
> > it will only cause confusion of trying to separate what functionality is
in
> > 2000 or 2003 when I go for the MCSE 2000. Is this a valid concern or is
the
> > order not a big deal?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Paul
>