I'm looking at the MCNGP Site contemplating registration and I figured I'd
answer some of these questions first. But I'd like the
opinions of some of you more experienced MCNGPs in the group as to whether I
should actually register or not.

MCNGP Requirements:

1.. Must be able to prove proficiency in network design implementation and
management.
--Shouldn't be a problem, I've been a Network Admin since NT 4.0, I'm working on
my MCSA/MCSE now to actually prove the proficiency.

2.. Must excel in OS installation methods, performance tweaking and
troubleshooting.
--Again, shouldn't be a problem, built computers and networks long before I
became a Net Admin. Built all of my own computers,
except for that first Compaq, had to REbuild that one after I took it apart.

3.. Must frequent microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse and provide a proven track
record of technically competent posts.
--Doing this now. It's a real friggin experience.

4.. Must demonstrate posting skills both defensive and offensively.
--Hope I've done a good enough job, if not, they'll get better, I've just gotta
get used to y'all. And if you don't like my posts, you can fsck off and go read
your sappy Harlequins

5.. Must know what Chalk's term is and must have used it at least twice in
it's pure form.
--I know what it is, but for fear of letting the secret out to the
a.z.z.f.u.s.k.e.r.s that claim to be outsmarting the system by
taking br@indumps and cheat exams, I'm not going to blurt it out.

6.. Must have excellent knowledge of Kerpalism.
--Kerpal was a wise man, I remember this time my daughter went to his house and
kicked the kr@p out of his dog. Funny story, I'll have to tell it some day.

7.. Must be willing to stand beside your fellow MCNGP's.
--Beside, behind, or in front of, intelligence and arrogance prevail.


Proficiency in the following areas:
1.. Enterprise solutions.
--It's just Small Business solutions right now. But to quote a great
Jefferson...."We're mooovin' on up...."

2.. Operating Systems other then (<---Tell the friggin webmaster to fix the
typo, it's "THAN") and as well as MS.
--Ok, sorry, hardcore MS user here. I took too many courses in college that
forced me to work on UNIX/LINUX systems. Worst
experience in my life. Not that it was difficult, just slow and boring. Worked
with X-Windows a little, just not the same. And
those MACs scuk...who the h3ll would design a mouse with 1 click function?!?!
Although the MAC graphics, for pictures and video,
were far superior to MS, I still prefer MS's functions.

3.. Proper use and misuse, when appropriate, of the English language.
--I think you all know my view of the English language by now.

4.. Newsgroup Flaming Techniques.
--If I haven't, I will, be sure of that.

5.. Belittling those whose skill set is far beneath their own, in a tactful
and professional manner.
--Ha! I once told a guy to go to h3ll in such a polite way, that I was also able
to get him to bring me back a cup of coffee when he returned.

6.. Fluent in movie, tv and song quoting.
--Between me and my brother, we know everything. Hmmm....sorry...that, my
brother knows.

Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by JaR

JaR
Fri Jan 27 13:32:08 CST 2006

Echoed forth from the dank caverns of microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse,
the plaintive wail of Robert Williams:

> I'm looking at the MCNGP Site contemplating registration and I figured
> I'd answer some of these questions first. But I'd like the
> opinions of some of you more experienced MCNGPs in the group as to
> whether I should actually register or not.

A trifling misunderstanding here.

Registering to access the site does not grant one MCNGP status. Also be
aware that it only permits use of the public sections. Use of the so-
called "Sekrit Site" is restricted to holders of the hallowed MCNGP only.

MCNGP status is awarded only to individuals that have demonstrated the
qualities mentioned on the site, and nomination by a member, after
careful review by the membership committee, and a vote of the membership.

Bribery is, of course, an acceptable alternative to the qualification
process, but be forewarned, we are not cheap!

--
JaR
MCNGP 10110
Remove hat to reply
Don't panic! ~Douglas Adams

Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by kpg

kpg
Fri Jan 27 13:40:00 CST 2006

JaR <lakabuxstetson@gmail.com> said something like

> Bribery is, of course, an acceptable alternative to the qualification
> process, but be forewarned, we are not cheap!

But kpg is cheaper than most, so IM me and I'm sure we can
work out a deal.

kpg

Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Jtyc

Jtyc
Fri Jan 27 13:41:27 CST 2006

> but be forewarned, we are not cheap!

Speak for yourself.



I'm very cheap.


*winks*



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Jtyc

Jtyc
Fri Jan 27 13:43:00 CST 2006

> But kpg is cheaper than most, so IM me and I'm sure we can
> work out a deal.

I have nicer legs.



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by The

The
Fri Jan 27 13:42:38 CST 2006

<snipage>
Bribery is, of course, an acceptable alternative to the qualification
process, but be forewarned, we are not cheap!
</snipage>

Frisbee is

--
.rev.mct.mcngp.44

It is the mark of an educated man to be able to entertain a thought without
accepting it.
~Aristotle
.
"JaR" <lakabuxstetson@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97587558E5CBBTalleywhacker@207.46.248.16...
> Echoed forth from the dank caverns of microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse,
> the plaintive wail of Robert Williams:
>
>> I'm looking at the MCNGP Site contemplating registration and I figured
>> I'd answer some of these questions first. But I'd like the
>> opinions of some of you more experienced MCNGPs in the group as to
>> whether I should actually register or not.
>
> A trifling misunderstanding here.
>
> Registering to access the site does not grant one MCNGP status. Also be
> aware that it only permits use of the public sections. Use of the so-
> called "Sekrit Site" is restricted to holders of the hallowed MCNGP only.
>
> MCNGP status is awarded only to individuals that have demonstrated the
> qualities mentioned on the site, and nomination by a member, after
> careful review by the membership committee, and a vote of the membership.
>
> Bribery is, of course, an acceptable alternative to the qualification
> process, but be forewarned, we are not cheap!
>
> --
> JaR
> MCNGP 10110
> Remove hat to reply
> Don't panic! ~Douglas Adams



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by JaR

JaR
Fri Jan 27 13:51:41 CST 2006

Echoed forth from the dank caverns of microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, the
plaintive wail of The Rev [MCT]:

> Frisbee is

> But kpg is cheaper than most, so IM me and I'm sure we can
work out a deal.

>I'm very cheap.

*sigh*

Guys, guys!

At this rate, we are never going to pay off the mortgage on the clubhouse.

--
JaR
MCNGP 10110
Remove hat to reply
They have computers, and they may have other weapons of mass destruction.
~Janet Reno

Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by The

The
Fri Jan 27 14:03:29 CST 2006

I thought Neil took one for the team last week and all that was taken car of
now.

--
.rev.mct.mcngp.44

It is the mark of an educated man to be able to entertain a thought without
accepting it.
~Aristotle
.
"JaR" <lakabuxstetson@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns975878A87CCE7Talleywhacker@207.46.248.16...
> Echoed forth from the dank caverns of microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, the
> plaintive wail of The Rev [MCT]:
>
>> Frisbee is
>
>> But kpg is cheaper than most, so IM me and I'm sure we can
> work out a deal.
>
>>I'm very cheap.
>
> *sigh*
>
> Guys, guys!
>
> At this rate, we are never going to pay off the mortgage on the clubhouse.
>
> --
> JaR
> MCNGP 10110
> Remove hat to reply
> They have computers, and they may have other weapons of mass destruction.
> ~Janet Reno



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 14:28:08 CST 2006


"JaR" <lakabuxstetson@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97587558E5CBBTalleywhacker@207.46.248.16...
> Echoed forth from the dank caverns of microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse,
> the plaintive wail of Robert Williams:
>
> > I'm looking at the MCNGP Site contemplating registration and I figured
> > I'd answer some of these questions first. But I'd like the
> > opinions of some of you more experienced MCNGPs in the group as to
> > whether I should actually register or not.
>
> A trifling misunderstanding here.
>
> Registering to access the site does not grant one MCNGP status. Also be
> aware that it only permits use of the public sections. Use of the so-
> called "Sekrit Site" is restricted to holders of the hallowed MCNGP only.
>
No sh!t? Really? Maybe you missed my point. I was contemplating registering,
AND while I was at it, I would poast my knowledge of the requirements to become
an MCNGP. I don't expect immediate MCNGP status from my poast, just found
answering those requirements to be entertaining.

> MCNGP status is awarded only to individuals that have demonstrated the
> qualities mentioned on the site, and nomination by a member, after
> careful review by the membership committee, and a vote of the membership.
>
Wow, a committee! Do you have a Yacht club, too?

> Bribery is, of course, an acceptable alternative to the qualification
> process, but be forewarned, we are not cheap!
>
How expensive are the BJs?




Hope you didn't get too flamed at what I wrote, it's all in jest. I like to
test my boundaries and push the edge.



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 14:29:47 CST 2006


"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam> wrote in message
news:Xns97588B043BAFAipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
> JaR <lakabuxstetson@gmail.com> said something like
>
> > Bribery is, of course, an acceptable alternative to the qualification
> > process, but be forewarned, we are not cheap!
>
> But kpg is cheaper than most, so IM me and I'm sure we can
> work out a deal.
>
> kpg

I don't know ALL the members yet, but as soon as I see MCNGP # in your sig, I'll
look you up.



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 14:30:44 CST 2006


"Jtyc" <yo@respondtothegroup.com> wrote in message
news:ufz8Ln3IGHA.1876@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > But kpg is cheaper than most, so IM me and I'm sure we can
> > work out a deal.
>
> I have nicer legs.
>
>
I like "stupid" legs.....that's when they make a perfect a$$ out of themselves.



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 14:31:47 CST 2006


"Jtyc" <yo@respondtothegroup.com> wrote in message
news:uPrXUm3IGHA.3728@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > but be forewarned, we are not cheap!
>
> Speak for yourself.
>
>
>
> I'm very cheap.
>
>
> *winks*
>
>
Like I said to kgp, I don't know all the members yet, but when I see MCNGP # in
your sig, I'll look you up.

We'll have a bidding war.



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 14:33:48 CST 2006


"JaR" <lakabuxstetson@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns975878A87CCE7Talleywhacker@207.46.248.16...
> Echoed forth from the dank caverns of microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, the
> plaintive wail of The Rev [MCT]:
>
> > Frisbee is
>
> > But kpg is cheaper than most, so IM me and I'm sure we can
> work out a deal.
>
> >I'm very cheap.
>
> *sigh*
>
> Guys, guys!
>
> At this rate, we are never going to pay off the mortgage on the clubhouse.
>
Clubhouse? or Treehouse?



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by The

The
Fri Jan 27 14:37:04 CST 2006

> Wow, a committee! Do you have a Yacht club, too?


We do have a Ferrari.....

--
.rev.mct.mcngp.44

It is the mark of an educated man to be able to entertain a thought without
accepting it.
~Aristotle
.
"Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
wrote in message news:u7OSxA4IGHA.1836@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>
> "JaR" <lakabuxstetson@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97587558E5CBBTalleywhacker@207.46.248.16...
>> Echoed forth from the dank caverns of microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse,
>> the plaintive wail of Robert Williams:
>>
>> > I'm looking at the MCNGP Site contemplating registration and I figured
>> > I'd answer some of these questions first. But I'd like the
>> > opinions of some of you more experienced MCNGPs in the group as to
>> > whether I should actually register or not.
>>
>> A trifling misunderstanding here.
>>
>> Registering to access the site does not grant one MCNGP status. Also be
>> aware that it only permits use of the public sections. Use of the so-
>> called "Sekrit Site" is restricted to holders of the hallowed MCNGP only.
>>
> No sh!t? Really? Maybe you missed my point. I was contemplating
> registering,
> AND while I was at it, I would poast my knowledge of the requirements to
> become
> an MCNGP. I don't expect immediate MCNGP status from my poast, just found
> answering those requirements to be entertaining.
>
>> MCNGP status is awarded only to individuals that have demonstrated the
>> qualities mentioned on the site, and nomination by a member, after
>> careful review by the membership committee, and a vote of the membership.
>>
> Wow, a committee! Do you have a Yacht club, too?
>
>> Bribery is, of course, an acceptable alternative to the qualification
>> process, but be forewarned, we are not cheap!
>>
> How expensive are the BJs?
>
>
>
>
> Hope you didn't get too flamed at what I wrote, it's all in jest. I like
> to
> test my boundaries and push the edge.
>
>



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Neil

Neil
Fri Jan 27 14:40:30 CST 2006

did you hear "Robert Williams"
<RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
news:uXBJ8D4IGHA.1288@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:

> Clubhouse? or Treehouse?

both. The treehouse is out back for a quiet evening under teh stars with
the more interested ladies. The clubhouse is a more fortified ascape from
the groupies who wont leave us alone.

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- I am, therefore, I think. I think.

Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by JaR

JaR
Fri Jan 27 14:45:28 CST 2006

Echoed forth from the dank caverns of microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse,
the plaintive wail of Robert Williams:

> No sh!t? Really? Maybe you missed my point.

Eh? Possibly. Hang on a tic.

*re-reads OP*

Well, you do a nice job ob obscuring that point. However, in the interest
of brevity and generousity, I willingly concede that I missed said point.


> Wow, a committee! Do you have a Yacht club, too?

Yes, we do. Although the fleet is [0] currently limited to a Donzi with a
blown engine, a couple of leaky rowboats, and one of those swan things
you paddle around in that Rowdy stole from a park somewhere.
>
> How expensive are the BJs?
>

You will have to make your own arrangements with Maggie. She may not
swallow, but she bakes a mean choklit chip cookie.

>
> Hope you didn't get too flamed at what I wrote, it's all in jest. I
> like to test my boundaries and push the edge.

It's unlikely that could happen.

[0] Due to budget restraints caused by members setting their bribery
thresholds too low.

--
JaR
MCNGP 10110
Remove hat to reply
What did you do to the cat? It looks half-dead. -- Schroedinger's wife

Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Death

Death
Fri Jan 27 14:45:32 CST 2006


You realize that you look like a desperate wannabie right?


Death from Above

"Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
wrote in message news:%23EEYgR3IGHA.1760@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> I'm looking at the MCNGP Site contemplating registration and I figured I'd
> answer some of these questions first. But I'd like the
> opinions of some of you more experienced MCNGPs in the group as to whether
> I
> should actually register or not.
>
> MCNGP Requirements:
>
> 1.. Must be able to prove proficiency in network design implementation
> and
> management.
> --Shouldn't be a problem, I've been a Network Admin since NT 4.0, I'm
> working on
> my MCSA/MCSE now to actually prove the proficiency.
>
> 2.. Must excel in OS installation methods, performance tweaking and
> troubleshooting.
> --Again, shouldn't be a problem, built computers and networks long before
> I
> became a Net Admin. Built all of my own computers,
> except for that first Compaq, had to REbuild that one after I took it
> apart.
>
> 3.. Must frequent microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse and provide a proven
> track
> record of technically competent posts.
> --Doing this now. It's a real friggin experience.
>
> 4.. Must demonstrate posting skills both defensive and offensively.
> --Hope I've done a good enough job, if not, they'll get better, I've just
> gotta
> get used to y'all. And if you don't like my posts, you can fsck off and
> go read
> your sappy Harlequins
>
> 5.. Must know what Chalk's term is and must have used it at least twice
> in
> it's pure form.
> --I know what it is, but for fear of letting the secret out to the
> a.z.z.f.u.s.k.e.r.s that claim to be outsmarting the system by
> taking br@indumps and cheat exams, I'm not going to blurt it out.
>
> 6.. Must have excellent knowledge of Kerpalism.
> --Kerpal was a wise man, I remember this time my daughter went to his
> house and
> kicked the kr@p out of his dog. Funny story, I'll have to tell it some
> day.
>
> 7.. Must be willing to stand beside your fellow MCNGP's.
> --Beside, behind, or in front of, intelligence and arrogance prevail.
>
>
> Proficiency in the following areas:
> 1.. Enterprise solutions.
> --It's just Small Business solutions right now. But to quote a great
> Jefferson...."We're mooovin' on up...."
>
> 2.. Operating Systems other then (<---Tell the friggin webmaster to fix
> the
> typo, it's "THAN") and as well as MS.
> --Ok, sorry, hardcore MS user here. I took too many courses in college
> that
> forced me to work on UNIX/LINUX systems. Worst
> experience in my life. Not that it was difficult, just slow and boring.
> Worked
> with X-Windows a little, just not the same. And
> those MACs scuk...who the h3ll would design a mouse with 1 click
> function?!?!
> Although the MAC graphics, for pictures and video,
> were far superior to MS, I still prefer MS's functions.
>
> 3.. Proper use and misuse, when appropriate, of the English language.
> --I think you all know my view of the English language by now.
>
> 4.. Newsgroup Flaming Techniques.
> --If I haven't, I will, be sure of that.
>
> 5.. Belittling those whose skill set is far beneath their own, in a
> tactful
> and professional manner.
> --Ha! I once told a guy to go to h3ll in such a polite way, that I was
> also able
> to get him to bring me back a cup of coffee when he returned.
>
> 6.. Fluent in movie, tv and song quoting.
> --Between me and my brother, we know everything. Hmmm....sorry...that, my
> brother knows.
>
>
>
>
>



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 14:46:01 CST 2006


"Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97589F74CA2D9neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> did you hear "Robert Williams"
> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
> news:uXBJ8D4IGHA.1288@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>
> > Clubhouse? or Treehouse?
>
> both. The treehouse is out back for a quiet evening under teh stars with
> the more interested ladies. The clubhouse is a more fortified ascape from
> the groupies who wont leave us alone.
>
Sweet...But does that mean there are two fees?



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by JaR

JaR
Fri Jan 27 14:49:20 CST 2006

Echoed forth from the dank caverns of microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, the
plaintive wail of The Rev [MCT]:

>> Wow, a committee! Do you have a Yacht club, too?
>
>
> We do have a Ferrari.....

Somewhere...

--
JaR
MCNGP 10110
Remove hat to reply
Don't panic! ~Douglas Adams

Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 14:52:14 CST 2006


"The Rev [MCT]" <ireportbadpeople@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:e21p7F4IGHA.1760@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > Wow, a committee! Do you have a Yacht club, too?
>
>
> We do have a Ferrari.....
>
My Ford GT would whoop up on that Ferrari

http://www.seriouswheels.com/top-2006-Ford-Tungsten-GT-Limited-Edition.htm



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Brat

Brat
Fri Jan 27 14:54:46 CST 2006

"Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
wrote in message news:OZPuzC4IGHA.2708@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>
> "Jtyc" <yo@respondtothegroup.com> wrote in message
> news:uPrXUm3IGHA.3728@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> > but be forewarned, we are not cheap!
>>
>> Speak for yourself.
>>
>>
>>
>> I'm very cheap.
>>
>>
>> *winks*
>>
>>
> Like I said to kgp, I don't know all the members yet, but when I see MCNGP
> # in
> your sig, I'll look you up.
>
> We'll have a bidding war.
>

lol I ain't as cheap as JYTC or kpg


--
Brat ® MCNGP # 69



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by The

The
Fri Jan 27 14:56:01 CST 2006

Who lost it this time?

--
.rev.mct.mcngp.44

It is the mark of an educated man to be able to entertain a thought without
accepting it.
~Aristotle
.
"JaR" <lakabuxstetson@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9758826F22DB3Talleywhacker@207.46.248.16...
> Echoed forth from the dank caverns of microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, the
> plaintive wail of The Rev [MCT]:
>
>>> Wow, a committee! Do you have a Yacht club, too?
>>
>>
>> We do have a Ferrari.....
>
> Somewhere...
>
> --
> JaR
> MCNGP 10110
> Remove hat to reply
> Don't panic! ~Douglas Adams



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by kpg

kpg
Fri Jan 27 14:57:14 CST 2006

> lol I ain't as cheap as JYTC or kpg


and that's just a shame...

Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by kpg

kpg
Fri Jan 27 14:56:41 CST 2006

Robert Williams <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
said something like

> Sweet...But does that mean there are two fees?


There are layers of fees.

Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by FrisbeeŽ

Frisbee®
Fri Jan 27 15:00:54 CST 2006

"Death from Above" <supaninja@kickin.booty.com> wrote in message
news:OCu4eK4IGHA.3020@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>
> You realize that you look like a desperate wannabie right?

Name a current MCNGP member who was not a desperate wannabe before he/she
became a member. Maybe Billyw, but he's not here anymore. It's the allure
and prestige of the premier certification that draws people to us like
flies.

MCP's - a gazillion
MCNGP's - 50.



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Jtyc

Jtyc
Fri Jan 27 15:00:49 CST 2006

> lol I ain't as cheap as JYTC or kpg

Typical woman...



*duck and cover*



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 15:00:44 CST 2006


"JaR" <lakabuxstetson@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns975881C45D5FFTalleywhacker@207.46.248.16...
> Echoed forth from the dank caverns of microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse,
> the plaintive wail of Robert Williams:
>
> > No sh!t? Really? Maybe you missed my point.
>
> Eh? Possibly. Hang on a tic.
>
> *re-reads OP*
>
> Well, you do a nice job ob obscuring that point. However, in the interest
> of brevity and generousity, I willingly concede that I missed said point.
>
>
You're a good man.

> > Wow, a committee! Do you have a Yacht club, too?
>
> Yes, we do. Although the fleet is [0] currently limited to a Donzi with a
> blown engine, a couple of leaky rowboats, and one of those swan things
> you paddle around in that Rowdy stole from a park somewhere.

I also happen to be a mechanic
> >
> > How expensive are the BJs?
> >
>
> You will have to make your own arrangements with Maggie. She may not
> swallow, but she bakes a mean choklit chip cookie.
>
What's her #?

> >
> > Hope you didn't get too flamed at what I wrote, it's all in jest. I
> > like to test my boundaries and push the edge.
>
> It's unlikely that could happen.
>
> [0] Due to budget restraints caused by members setting their bribery
> thresholds too low.
>
It's a dog-eat-dog world out there. Lowest bid wins it.



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by CBIC

CBIC
Fri Jan 27 15:02:55 CST 2006

In news:Xns97589804D4934ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1,
kpg <kenatweekendcomputerdotcom> embarrassed himself by saying:
> Robert Williams <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
> said something like
>
>> Sweet...But does that mean there are two fees?
>
>
> There are layers of fees.

and goats...
--
aka
Doom MCNGP #38
Is that a burdizzo in your pocket or are you just glad to see me.




Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 15:03:36 CST 2006


"Death from Above" <supaninja@kickin.booty.com> wrote in message
news:OCu4eK4IGHA.3020@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>
> You realize that you look like a desperate wannabie right?
>
>
> Death from Above
>
Who the fcuk is *this* schmuck?



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by CBIC

CBIC
Fri Jan 27 15:04:43 CST 2006


> It's the allure and prestige of the premier certification that draws
> people to us like flies.
>
I thought it was the smell that drew the flies.
--
aka
Doom MCNGP #38
Is that a burdizzo in your pocket or are you just glad to see me.




Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 15:05:10 CST 2006


"kpg" <kenatweekendcomputerdotcom> wrote in message
news:Xns97589804D4934ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
> Robert Williams <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
> said something like
>
> > Sweet...But does that mean there are two fees?
>
>
> There are layers of fees.

You've got lawyers too!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! Oh wait, that's layers again.



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 15:04:18 CST 2006


"Brat" <likeIwould@inyourdreams.com> wrote in message
news:qMvCf.2370$VV4.63986@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> "Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
> wrote in message news:OZPuzC4IGHA.2708@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> >
> > "Jtyc" <yo@respondtothegroup.com> wrote in message
> > news:uPrXUm3IGHA.3728@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> >> > but be forewarned, we are not cheap!
> >>
> >> Speak for yourself.
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> I'm very cheap.
> >>
> >>
> >> *winks*
> >>
> >>
> > Like I said to kgp, I don't know all the members yet, but when I see MCNGP
> > # in
> > your sig, I'll look you up.
> >
> > We'll have a bidding war.
> >
>
> lol I ain't as cheap as JYTC or kpg
>
>
If you want money, you'll have to be



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Jtyc

Jtyc
Fri Jan 27 15:05:08 CST 2006

> Maybe Billyw, but he's not here anymore.

I think Rumsfeld finally caught him for haggis smuggling.





bloody English...





Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Jtyc

Jtyc
Fri Jan 27 15:07:16 CST 2006

> It's a dog-eat-dog world out there. Lowest bid wins it.


*holds up sign "Will work for navel lint"*




Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Neil

Neil
Fri Jan 27 15:06:58 CST 2006

did you hear kpg <kenatweekendcomputerdotcom> say in
news:Xns97589804D4934ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1:

> Robert Williams <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
> said something like
>
>> Sweet...But does that mean there are two fees?
>
>
> There are layers of fees.

we're complex. remember?

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- The gene pool has no lifeguard.

Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 15:09:16 CST 2006


"CBIC" <spam.thisbiotch@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23Yt6MU4IGHA.2212@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> In news:Xns97589804D4934ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1,
> kpg <kenatweekendcomputerdotcom> embarrassed himself by saying:
> > Robert Williams <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
> > said something like
> >
> >> Sweet...But does that mean there are two fees?
> >
> >
> > There are layers of fees.
>
> and goats...

I prefer sheep, they don't fight as much



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Jtyc

Jtyc
Fri Jan 27 15:09:48 CST 2006

>> Death from Above
>>
> Who the fcuk is *this* schmuck?

Apparently a disgruntled paratrooper.



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 15:10:08 CST 2006


"Jtyc" <yo@respondtothegroup.com> wrote in message
news:%23aw5RW4IGHA.2628@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> > It's a dog-eat-dog world out there. Lowest bid wins it.
>
>
> *holds up sign "Will work for navel lint"*
>
>
Naval Lint...I'll never do that again



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 15:10:39 CST 2006


"CBIC" <spam.thisbiotch@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:ejvRNV4IGHA.1876@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>
> > It's the allure and prestige of the premier certification that draws
> > people to us like flies.
> >
> I thought it was the smell that drew the flies.
> --
> aka
> Doom MCNGP #38
> Is that a burdizzo in your pocket or are you just glad to see me.
>
>
*That's* what that was....damn



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Brat

Brat
Fri Jan 27 15:12:59 CST 2006

"Jtyc" <yo@respondtothegroup.com> wrote in message
news:uamGrS4IGHA.1848@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>> lol I ain't as cheap as JYTC or kpg
>
> Typical woman...
>
>
>
> *duck and cover*
>

*finds the foxhole* BOOM!



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Brat

Brat
Fri Jan 27 15:13:49 CST 2006

"Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
wrote in message news:e8Q4%23U4IGHA.3856@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>
> "Brat" <likeIwould@inyourdreams.com> wrote in message
> news:qMvCf.2370$VV4.63986@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>> "Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
>> wrote in message news:OZPuzC4IGHA.2708@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> >
>> > "Jtyc" <yo@respondtothegroup.com> wrote in message
>> > news:uPrXUm3IGHA.3728@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>> >> > but be forewarned, we are not cheap!
>> >>
>> >> Speak for yourself.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> I'm very cheap.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> *winks*
>> >>
>> >>
>> > Like I said to kgp, I don't know all the members yet, but when I see
>> > MCNGP
>> > # in
>> > your sig, I'll look you up.
>> >
>> > We'll have a bidding war.
>> >
>>
>> lol I ain't as cheap as JYTC or kpg
>>
>>
> If you want money, you'll have to be
>
>

HEY! you said you were a network admin! You MUST be making more than my
corp helpdesk pay

SHEESH!




Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by FrisbeeŽ

Frisbee®
Fri Jan 27 15:13:20 CST 2006

"Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
wrote in message news:%23RYR$S4IGHA.3000@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
>> You will have to make your own arrangements with Maggie. She may not
>> swallow, but she bakes a mean choklit chip cookie.
>>
> What's her #?

You sure have a lot more studying to do.

For bonus points: Who is Paisley Skye?



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Neil

Neil
Fri Jan 27 15:11:47 CST 2006

did you hear "Brat" <likeIwould@inyourdreams.com> say in news:qMvCf.2370
$VV4.63986@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca:

>
> lol I ain't as cheap as JYTC or kpg

but you're the only one suggesting 69 in your sig...

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- Never anger a cat - they WILL get revenge.

Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Death

Death
Fri Jan 27 15:12:35 CST 2006


I'll take that as a no. But then again, that's what makes your posts so fun
to read.


Death from Above

"Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
wrote in message news:u6gjlU4IGHA.1876@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>
> "Death from Above" <supaninja@kickin.booty.com> wrote in message
> news:OCu4eK4IGHA.3020@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>
>> You realize that you look like a desperate wannabie right?
>>
>>
>> Death from Above
>>
> Who the fcuk is *this* schmuck?
>
>



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by FrisbeeŽ

Frisbee®
Fri Jan 27 15:14:40 CST 2006

"Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
wrote in message news:u6gjlU4IGHA.1876@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>
> "Death from Above" <supaninja@kickin.booty.com> wrote in message
> news:OCu4eK4IGHA.3020@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>
>> You realize that you look like a desperate wannabie right?
>>
>>
>> Death from Above
>>
> Who the fcuk is *this* schmuck?

If memory serves (and it often doesn't) he's not necessarily a bad guy.

I think he secretly admires us, but I also think he wouldn't admit that even
under Chinese water torture.

Either that or he's Billyw's sockpuppet.



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by LRM

LRM
Fri Jan 27 15:13:04 CST 2006

"Jtyc" <yo@respondtothegroup.com> wrote in message
news:uq6LsX4IGHA.2704@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>>> Death from Above
>>>
>> Who the fcuk is *this* schmuck?
>
> Apparently a disgruntled paratrooper.
>
LMAO!



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Brat

Brat
Fri Jan 27 15:16:05 CST 2006

"Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9758A4C267048neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> did you hear "Brat" <likeIwould@inyourdreams.com> say in news:qMvCf.2370
> $VV4.63986@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca:
>
>>
>> lol I ain't as cheap as JYTC or kpg
>
> but you're the only one suggesting 69 in your sig...
>

Not my fault everyone was slow!


--
Brat ® MCNGP # 69 (10)



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 15:15:38 CST 2006


"Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9758A3F0DC079neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> did you hear kpg <kenatweekendcomputerdotcom> say in
> news:Xns97589804D4934ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1:
>
> > Robert Williams <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
> > said something like
> >
> >> Sweet...But does that mean there are two fees?
> >
> >
> > There are layers of fees.
>
> we're complex. remember?
>
Complex, like a complex?



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Neil

Neil
Fri Jan 27 15:18:46 CST 2006

did you hear "Robert Williams"
<RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
news:eF0DUb4IGHA.1288@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:

> Complex, like a complex?

NO! Just a treehouse, clubhouse and the yatch club....jeez, doncha ever
listen?

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- I saw it in a cartoon, but I'm pretty sure I can do it.

Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Neil

Neil
Fri Jan 27 15:17:54 CST 2006

did you hear "Brat" <likeIwould@inyourdreams.com> say in news:p4wCf.2384
$VV4.64262@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca:

> Not my fault everyone was slow!

you cheated, you know it and it's just plain mean to tease me with that
sig...

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#XXX

- "They threw me out of my subdivision," he said distractedly.

Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Neil

Neil
Fri Jan 27 15:19:05 CST 2006

did you hear "Frisbee®" <billLASTNAME@yahoo.com> say in
news:u7Cb2Y4IGHA.3700@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl:

> Paisley Skye?

you no say bad word

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- I saw it in a cartoon, but I'm pretty sure I can do it.

Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Brat

Brat
Fri Jan 27 15:21:57 CST 2006

"Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9758A5CBDEEC9neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> did you hear "Brat" <likeIwould@inyourdreams.com> say in news:p4wCf.2384
> $VV4.64262@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca:
>
>> Not my fault everyone was slow!
>
> you cheated, you know it and it's just plain mean to tease me with that
> sig...
>

Well considering you got your # 20 people later... not my fault I got in
when the going (and pickings) were good.

I just hope that when we get up to 69 that they dont give it away :(

Hey Fris? Have they blocked that number?????



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 15:19:10 CST 2006


"Jtyc" <yo@respondtothegroup.com> wrote in message
news:uq6LsX4IGHA.2704@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> >> Death from Above
> >>
> > Who the fcuk is *this* schmuck?
>
> Apparently a disgruntled paratrooper.
>
>
*apparently*....he just dropped in from nowhere....



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 15:22:33 CST 2006


"Frisbee®" <billLASTNAME@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:u7Cb2Y4IGHA.3700@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> "Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
> wrote in message news:%23RYR$S4IGHA.3000@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> >> You will have to make your own arrangements with Maggie. She may not
> >> swallow, but she bakes a mean choklit chip cookie.
> >>
> > What's her #?
>
> You sure have a lot more studying to do.
>
> For bonus points: Who is Paisley Skye?
>
>
You mean that skank with the hairy snatch? The "porn secretary" cam girl?



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by FrisbeeŽ

Frisbee®
Fri Jan 27 15:25:16 CST 2006

"Jtyc" <yo@respondtothegroup.com> wrote in message
news:uq6LsX4IGHA.2704@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>>> Death from Above
>>>
>> Who the fcuk is *this* schmuck?
>
> Apparently a disgruntled paratrooper.

PotD.

Your first?



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 15:23:57 CST 2006


"Death from Above" <supaninja@kickin.booty.com> wrote in message
news:%2331GmZ4IGHA.532@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>
> I'll take that as a no. But then again, that's what makes your posts so fun
> to read.
>
>
Well, enjoy, but do it from afar.



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 15:25:15 CST 2006


"Frisbee®" <billLASTNAME@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eZYZmZ4IGHA.2460@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> "Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
> wrote in message news:u6gjlU4IGHA.1876@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> >
> > "Death from Above" <supaninja@kickin.booty.com> wrote in message
> > news:OCu4eK4IGHA.3020@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> >>
> >> You realize that you look like a desperate wannabie right?
> >>
> >>
> >> Death from Above
> >>
> > Who the fcuk is *this* schmuck?
>
> If memory serves (and it often doesn't) he's not necessarily a bad guy.
>
> I think he secretly admires us, but I also think he wouldn't admit that even
> under Chinese water torture.
>
> Either that or he's Billyw's sockpuppet.
>
>
Yeah, kinda sounds like he's jealous....was he turned down for membership at one
point?



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 15:26:45 CST 2006


"Brat" <likeIwould@inyourdreams.com> wrote in message
news:h2wCf.2381$VV4.64231@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> "Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
> wrote in message news:e8Q4%23U4IGHA.3856@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> >
> > "Brat" <likeIwould@inyourdreams.com> wrote in message
> > news:qMvCf.2370$VV4.63986@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> >> "Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
> >> wrote in message news:OZPuzC4IGHA.2708@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> >> >
> >> > "Jtyc" <yo@respondtothegroup.com> wrote in message
> >> > news:uPrXUm3IGHA.3728@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> >> >> > but be forewarned, we are not cheap!
> >> >>
> >> >> Speak for yourself.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> I'm very cheap.
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> >> *winks*
> >> >>
> >> >>
> >> > Like I said to kgp, I don't know all the members yet, but when I see
> >> > MCNGP
> >> > # in
> >> > your sig, I'll look you up.
> >> >
> >> > We'll have a bidding war.
> >> >
> >>
> >> lol I ain't as cheap as JYTC or kpg
> >>
> >>
> > If you want money, you'll have to be
> >
> >
>
> HEY! you said you were a network admin! You MUST be making more than my
> corp helpdesk pay
>
> SHEESH!
>
Doesn't matter what I make...I could always use more...and if I can save a
little, more for me.



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 15:28:36 CST 2006


"Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9758A5F10B7C5neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> did you hear "Robert Williams"
> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
> news:eF0DUb4IGHA.1288@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>
> > Complex, like a complex?
>
> NO! Just a treehouse, clubhouse and the yatch club....jeez, doncha ever
> listen?
>
Don't make me get my layers!!



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by FrisbeeŽ

Frisbee®
Fri Jan 27 15:33:34 CST 2006

"Brat" <likeIwould@inyourdreams.com> wrote in message
news:V9wCf.2391$VV4.64484@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> "Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9758A5CBDEEC9neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
>> did you hear "Brat" <likeIwould@inyourdreams.com> say in news:p4wCf.2384
>> $VV4.64262@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca:
>>
>>> Not my fault everyone was slow!
>>
>> you cheated, you know it and it's just plain mean to tease me with that
>> sig...
>>
>
> Well considering you got your # 20 people later... not my fault I got in
> when the going (and pickings) were good.
>
> I just hope that when we get up to 69 that they dont give it away :(
>
> Hey Fris? Have they blocked that number?????

You're member #10.

You may, however, continue to call yourself member #69 until we reach that
number. Then a cease and desist order shall be issued.



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Brat

Brat
Fri Jan 27 15:36:13 CST 2006

"Frisbee®" <billLASTNAME@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eS8EKk4IGHA.1192@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> "Brat" <likeIwould@inyourdreams.com> wrote in message
> news:V9wCf.2391$VV4.64484@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>> "Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9758A5CBDEEC9neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
>>> did you hear "Brat" <likeIwould@inyourdreams.com> say in news:p4wCf.2384
>>> $VV4.64262@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca:
>>>
>>>> Not my fault everyone was slow!
>>>
>>> you cheated, you know it and it's just plain mean to tease me with that
>>> sig...
>>>
>>
>> Well considering you got your # 20 people later... not my fault I got in
>> when the going (and pickings) were good.
>>
>> I just hope that when we get up to 69 that they dont give it away :(
>>
>> Hey Fris? Have they blocked that number?????
>
> You're member #10.
>
> You may, however, continue to call yourself member #69 until we reach that
> number. Then a cease and desist order shall be issued.
>
>

No fair! C was the one who told me to use it



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by kpg

kpg
Fri Jan 27 15:33:41 CST 2006

Robert Williams <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
said something like

>> For bonus points: Who is Paisley Skye?
>>
>>
> You mean that skank with the hairy snatch? The "porn secretary" cam
> girl?

um...possibly.

Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Jtyc

Jtyc
Fri Jan 27 15:34:59 CST 2006

> Your first?

Are you implying my posts lack substance?

I scoff at thee!


*scoffs*



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 15:37:50 CST 2006


"kpg" <kenatweekendcomputerdotcom> wrote in message
news:Xns97589E4A54769ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
> Robert Williams <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
> said something like
>
> >> For bonus points: Who is Paisley Skye?
> >>
> >>
> > You mean that skank with the hairy snatch? The "porn secretary" cam
> > girl?
>
> um...possibly.

She's nasty!



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Robert

Robert
Fri Jan 27 15:38:27 CST 2006


"Jtyc" <yo@respondtothegroup.com> wrote in message
news:eMeSxl4IGHA.3224@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > Your first?
>
> Are you implying my posts lack substance?
>
> I scoff at thee!
>
>
> *scoffs*
>
I've seen more substance on Ally McBeal



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by FrisbeeŽ

Frisbee®
Fri Jan 27 15:38:10 CST 2006

"Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
wrote in message news:%23nmtrg4IGHA.1180@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>
> "Frisbee®" <billLASTNAME@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:eZYZmZ4IGHA.2460@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> "Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
>> wrote in message news:u6gjlU4IGHA.1876@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>> >
>> > "Death from Above" <supaninja@kickin.booty.com> wrote in message
>> > news:OCu4eK4IGHA.3020@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> >>
>> >> You realize that you look like a desperate wannabie right?
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Death from Above
>> >>
>> > Who the fcuk is *this* schmuck?
>>
>> If memory serves (and it often doesn't) he's not necessarily a bad guy.
>>
>> I think he secretly admires us, but I also think he wouldn't admit that
>> even
>> under Chinese water torture.
>>
>> Either that or he's Billyw's sockpuppet.
>>
>>
> Yeah, kinda sounds like he's jealous....was he turned down for membership
> at one
> point?

No, actually as I recall, he(/she/it) has made several posts that gave me
the impression that he's like-minded with us, however I do not get the sense
that he wishes to become a member, so no invitation has been extended. We
prefer members post a bit more frequently, and stick around as well. He's
kind of like molsonexpert in that regard.



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Brat

Brat
Fri Jan 27 15:39:36 CST 2006

"Brat" <likeIwould@inyourdreams.com> wrote in message
news:hnwCf.2395$VV4.64564@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
> "Frisbee®" <billLASTNAME@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:eS8EKk4IGHA.1192@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>> "Brat" <likeIwould@inyourdreams.com> wrote in message
>> news:V9wCf.2391$VV4.64484@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca...
>>> "Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
>>> news:Xns9758A5CBDEEC9neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
>>>> did you hear "Brat" <likeIwould@inyourdreams.com> say in
>>>> news:p4wCf.2384
>>>> $VV4.64262@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca:
>>>>
>>>>> Not my fault everyone was slow!
>>>>
>>>> you cheated, you know it and it's just plain mean to tease me with that
>>>> sig...
>>>>
>>>
>>> Well considering you got your # 20 people later... not my fault I got in
>>> when the going (and pickings) were good.
>>>
>>> I just hope that when we get up to 69 that they dont give it away :(
>>>
>>> Hey Fris? Have they blocked that number?????
>>
>> You're member #10.
>>
>> You may, however, continue to call yourself member #69 until we reach
>> that number. Then a cease and desist order shall be issued.
>>
>>
>
> No fair! C was the one who told me to use it
>

<cartman>

Hey screw you guys

</cartman>


--
Brat ® MCNGP # 69
The Original and Forever MINE



Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by kpg

kpg
Fri Jan 27 15:37:17 CST 2006

Robert Williams <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
said something like

> Yeah, kinda sounds like he's jealous....was he turned down for
> membership at one point?

You're still fuzzy on that...

...members are invited, not the other way around.


And if I recall, I liked DFA.

Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by kpg

kpg
Fri Jan 27 15:40:21 CST 2006

Frisbee® <billLASTNAME@yahoo.com> said something like

> You're member #10.

Being a 10 ain't all that bad.

Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by CBIC

CBIC
Fri Jan 27 15:40:09 CST 2006


> *That's* what that was....damn

Yeah sorry about that. I had Taco Bell for dinner.
--
aka
Doom MCNGP #38
Is that a burdizzo in your pocket or are you just glad to see me.




Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by CBIC

CBIC
Fri Jan 27 15:41:27 CST 2006


> Don't make me get my layers!!

I'll get my layers and he's going to rush you. No, I mean lawyer ah dambit I
'm so confused.
--
aka
Doom MCNGP #38
Is that a burdizzo in your pocket or are you just glad to see me.




Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by CBIC

CBIC
Fri Jan 27 15:42:18 CST 2006


> Naval Lint...I'll never do that again

Is that the stuff left in the dryer after doing laundry on a submarine?
--
aka
Doom MCNGP #38
Is that a burdizzo in your pocket or are you just glad to see me.




Re: MCNGP or not to MCNGP? by Brat

Brat
Fri Jan 27 15:43:38 CST 2006

"kpg" <kenatweekendcomputerdotcom> wrote in message
news:Xns97589F6C0C965ipos