=?ISO-8859-1?Q?=BF70-210_or_70-270=3F?=

I just passed the 70-290 exam. And now I'm looking for what client exam
prepare.
I know that one of both are valid, but have heard that the XP Pro it's
harder exam than the 2000 Pro.

Can someone give me his opinion?

Thanks a lot, and sorry about my english.


Alfredo Jiménez Ronssin du Chatelle.
From Spain.

Neil
Tue Feb 08 10:31:33 CST 2005

did you hear JeRiKo <jerikoo||@||en_TERRA_o.ES> say in news:EwSNd.210598
$A7.306358@telenews.teleline.es:

> I just passed the 70-290 exam. And now I'm looking for what client exam
> prepare.
> I know that one of both are valid, but have heard that the XP Pro it's
> harder exam than the 2000 Pro.
>
> Can someone give me his opinion?
>
> Thanks a lot, and sorry about my english.
>
>
> Alfredo Jiménez Ronssin du Chatelle.
> From Spain.
>

if you are working for someone, I would take what they use and test on
that. If not, the most recent product is usually best practice (XP) harder
or not.

--
Neil MCNGP #30

- Anything preying on your mind would starve to death.

anonymous
Fri Feb 11 15:12:39 CST 2005

I'd go with 70-270. I found that 70-290 is harder than =20
70-290 (obviously) so you should be fine. XP will be=20
around much longer and provides more functionality than=20
2000.


>-----Original Message-----
>I just passed the 70-290 exam. And now I'm looking for=20
what client exam=20
>prepare.
>I know that one of both are valid, but have heard that=20
the XP Pro it's=20
>harder exam than the 2000 Pro.
>
>Can someone give me his opinion?
>
>Thanks a lot, and sorry about my english.
>
>
>Alfredo Jim=E9nez Ronssin du Chatelle.
> From Spain.
>.
>