OT: Van Helsing

the worst! i was really looking forward to this one. this one pretty much
has nothing going for it other than hot vampire chicks.

everytime i see a crap movie i tell myself, "this is as bad as it gets.
can't get any worse" next thing i know, the following weekend i see a worse
one.

WHAT THE HELL IS THE MATTER WITH THE MOVIE INDUSTRY!!! why does every movie
have to suck so much!

Rowdy Yates, MCSE
--
Rowdy's Home Page
http://rowdy_yates2.tripod.com/
"it's a work in progress" :-(

Andy
Sat May 08 08:31:24 CDT 2004

"Rowdy Yates" <rowdy_yates2@remove.lycos.com> wrote in message
news:Xns94E2E61AC964Browdyyates2123@207.46.248.16...
> the worst! i was really looking forward to this one. this one pretty much
> has nothing going for it other than hot vampire chicks.
>
> everytime i see a crap movie i tell myself, "this is as bad as it gets.
> can't get any worse" next thing i know, the following weekend i see a
worse
> one.
>
> WHAT THE HELL IS THE MATTER WITH THE MOVIE INDUSTRY!!! why does every
movie
> have to suck so much!
>

It's a Hollywood conspiracy to deter P2P file sharers.
Imagine how you'd feel if you'd wasted several days downloading the film,
rather than just 2 hours in the local flea-pit...

poco
Sat May 08 16:41:30 CDT 2004

Hot vampire chicks ?

wooooowoooooo

"Rowdy Yates" <rowdy_yates2@remove.lycos.com> wrote in message
news:Xns94E2E61AC964Browdyyates2123@207.46.248.16...
> the worst! i was really looking forward to this one. this one pretty much
> has nothing going for it other than hot vampire chicks.
>
> everytime i see a crap movie i tell myself, "this is as bad as it gets.
> can't get any worse" next thing i know, the following weekend i see a
worse
> one.
>
> WHAT THE HELL IS THE MATTER WITH THE MOVIE INDUSTRY!!! why does every
movie
> have to suck so much!
>
> Rowdy Yates, MCSE
> --
> Rowdy's Home Page
> http://rowdy_yates2.tripod.com/
> "it's a work in progress" :-(

Rowdy
Sat May 08 18:56:09 CDT 2004

"poco" <poco3000@yahoo.com> wrote in news:c7jk0v0dm0@news4.newsguy.com:

>
> Hot vampire chicks ?
>
> wooooowoooooo

well, you got to get it where you can..

:-)

Rowdy Yates, MCSE
--
Rowdy's Home Page
http://rowdy_yates2.tripod.com/
"it's a work in progress" :-(

billyw
Sun May 09 07:00:23 CDT 2004

it's because most movies are made in hollywood for the american public..
who in general need their hand held thru a film rather than having to
think..
you get the movies you deserve


"Rowdy Yates" <rowdy_yates2@remove.lycos.com> wrote in message
news:Xns94E2E61AC964Browdyyates2123@207.46.248.16...
> the worst! i was really looking forward to this one. this one pretty much
> has nothing going for it other than hot vampire chicks.
>
> everytime i see a crap movie i tell myself, "this is as bad as it gets.
> can't get any worse" next thing i know, the following weekend i see a
worse
> one.
>
> WHAT THE HELL IS THE MATTER WITH THE MOVIE INDUSTRY!!! why does every
movie
> have to suck so much!
>
> Rowdy Yates, MCSE
> --
> Rowdy's Home Page
> http://rowdy_yates2.tripod.com/
> "it's a work in progress" :-(

Rowdy
Sun May 09 20:20:58 CDT 2004

"billyw" <b@brainless.net> wrote in news:eo1Lw0bNEHA.3988
@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:

> it's because most movies are made in hollywood for the american public..
> who in general need their hand held thru a film rather than having to
> think..
> you get the movies you deserve

you go, jean luc goddard, you go tell them loke it is baby.

Rowdy Yates, MCSE
--
Rowdy's Home Page
http://rowdy_yates2.tripod.com/
"it's a work in progress" :-(

billyw
Mon May 10 07:12:26 CDT 2004

hey, i',m here to help..


"Rowdy Yates" <rowdy_yates2@remove.lycos.com> wrote in message
news:Xns94E4D92C11997rowdyyates2123@207.46.248.16...
> "billyw" <b@brainless.net> wrote in news:eo1Lw0bNEHA.3988
> @TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>
> > it's because most movies are made in hollywood for the american public..
> > who in general need their hand held thru a film rather than having to
> > think..
> > you get the movies you deserve
>
> you go, jean luc goddard, you go tell them loke it is baby.
>
> Rowdy Yates, MCSE
> --
> Rowdy's Home Page
> http://rowdy_yates2.tripod.com/
> "it's a work in progress" :-(

Jtyc
Mon May 10 09:39:55 CDT 2004

> it's because most movies are made in hollywood for the american public..
> who in general need their hand held thru a film rather than having to
> think..
> you get the movies you deserve

Oh yeah?! Well... William Wallace was a pussy!

Consultant
Mon May 10 10:39:07 CDT 2004

fiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeefffffffffffffffdddddddddooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmm

"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:engrYypNEHA.628@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > it's because most movies are made in hollywood for the american public..
> > who in general need their hand held thru a film rather than having to
> > think..
> > you get the movies you deserve
>
> Oh yeah?! Well... William Wallace was a pussy!
>
>
>

Jtyc
Mon May 10 10:42:23 CDT 2004

> fiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeefffffffffffffffdddddddddooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmm


Fiefdom? Are you the king?

billyw
Mon May 10 11:41:35 CDT 2004

i would think his personal hygene was suspect as well...

"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:engrYypNEHA.628@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > it's because most movies are made in hollywood for the american public..
> > who in general need their hand held thru a film rather than having to
> > think..
> > you get the movies you deserve
>
> Oh yeah?! Well... William Wallace was a pussy!
>
>
>

billyw
Mon May 10 11:54:23 CDT 2004

boy, do they change the films quite a bit between countries..
mind you bush wouldn't want you guys getting the wrong idea..

not allowed to use the F word these days.. freedom that would be





























i know bush wasn't in power
"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:O26ekVqNEHA.640@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > fiiiieeeeeeeeeeeeeefffffffffffffffdddddddddooooooooooooooommmmmmmmmmm
>
>
> Fiefdom? Are you the king?
>
>

Jtyc
Mon May 10 11:58:35 CDT 2004

> boy, do they change the films quite a bit between countries..
> mind you bush wouldn't want you guys getting the wrong idea..
> not allowed to use the F word these days.. freedom that would be


Your preconceived notion of life in the United States is incorrect. I would
like to know from you what freedom you think that I no longer have.

Ken
Mon May 10 12:20:47 CDT 2004

"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:uGMdJArNEHA.4036@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > boy, do they change the films quite a bit between countries..
> > mind you bush wouldn't want you guys getting the wrong idea..
> > not allowed to use the F word these days.. freedom that would be
>
>
> Your preconceived notion of life in the United States is incorrect. I
would
> like to know from you what freedom you think that I no longer have.

freedom to look "suspicious", aka middle-eastern.

--

KB - MCNGP "silent thug" #26

first initial last name AT hotmail DOT com

Jtyc
Mon May 10 12:29:07 CDT 2004

> freedom to look "suspicious", aka middle-eastern.

I know of a few middle-eastern gas station owners around where I live who
don't seem to have any problems.

billyw
Mon May 10 12:35:28 CDT 2004

The PATRIOT Act also exacerbates the threat to individual liberty and
privacy and should be of special concern to librarians. Under this
legislation, librarians will be under a "gag order," punishable by law, that
will prevent them from informing library patrons that their records were
turned over to the FBI or are subject to ongoing monitoring.



even librarians are worried... now thats scary



http://www.commondreams.org/views03/0119-03.htm

"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:uGMdJArNEHA.4036@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > boy, do they change the films quite a bit between countries..
> > mind you bush wouldn't want you guys getting the wrong idea..
> > not allowed to use the F word these days.. freedom that would be
>
>
> Your preconceived notion of life in the United States is incorrect. I
would
> like to know from you what freedom you think that I no longer have.
>
>
>

JaR
Mon May 10 12:45:34 CDT 2004

Ken Briscoe opined, On 5/10/04 10:20 AM:

> "Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:uGMdJArNEHA.4036@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>
>>>boy, do they change the films quite a bit between countries..
>>>mind you bush wouldn't want you guys getting the wrong idea..
>>>not allowed to use the F word these days.. freedom that would be
>>
>>
>>Your preconceived notion of life in the United States is incorrect. I
>
> would
>
>>like to know from you what freedom you think that I no longer have.
>
>
> freedom to look "suspicious", aka middle-eastern.
>

Freedom to pass through a metal detector and be frisked before entering
public buildings.

Freedom to the above plus identity screening before boarding an airplane.

Freedom to wear seatbelts when I drive because I need sombody to look
after my safety, I can't do it myself.

Freedom to wear a helmet when I ride my bicycle for the same reason.

"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759

Jtyc
Mon May 10 12:43:04 CDT 2004

> even librarians are worried... now thats scary

If someone is checking out books on how to make and conceal bombs or any
other material that you could use to help you kill people more efficiently,
and the FBI decides to investigate them because it seems a little odd. I
wouldn't want the librarian giving that person a warning either. I would
rather the FBI be allowed to follow-up, and hopefully catch this sucker AND
his accomplices if he is indeed, a bad person.

That does not restrict my freedom to check out books.

billyw
Mon May 10 12:41:56 CDT 2004

bet they look suspicious though

"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:OSxONRrNEHA.1388@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > freedom to look "suspicious", aka middle-eastern.
>
> I know of a few middle-eastern gas station owners around where I live who
> don't seem to have any problems.
>
>
>

Jtyc
Mon May 10 13:06:45 CDT 2004

> bet they look suspicious though

How has that different from before? Teenagers look suspicious too.

Jtyc
Mon May 10 13:10:39 CDT 2004

> Freedom to pass through a metal detector and be frisked before entering
> public buildings.
> Freedom to the above plus identity screening before boarding an airplane.

I think having no security is as bad an idea as having too much.


> Freedom to wear seatbelts when I drive because I need sombody to look
> after my safety, I can't do it myself.
> Freedom to wear a helmet when I ride my bicycle for the same reason.

I agree these are pointless laws. If people are too stupid to buckle up or
put on a helmet, so be it. Are those laws exclusive to the US?

JaR
Mon May 10 13:35:14 CDT 2004

Jtyc opined, On 5/10/04 11:10 AM:

>>Freedom to pass through a metal detector and be frisked before entering
>>public buildings.
>>Freedom to the above plus identity screening before boarding an airplane.
>
>
> I think having no security is as bad an idea as having too much.
>

You asked billyw which freedoms you had lost recently. Whether you
regret the loss or not is irrelevant, they are now a fact in this
country. Personally, however, having to undergo a search of my person
before being permitted to enter City Hall is repugnant to me. It seems a
violation of every aspect of the freedoms our forefathers fought for.
Security be damned!

>
>
>>Freedom to wear seatbelts when I drive because I need sombody to look
>>after my safety, I can't do it myself.
>>Freedom to wear a helmet when I ride my bicycle for the same reason.
>
>
> I agree these are pointless laws. If people are too stupid to buckle up or
> put on a helmet, so be it. Are those laws exclusive to the US?
>

The exclusivity or not of the laws, again, is irrelevant. This country
was founded upon the principle of self-determination. That includes the
right to auto-Darwinate. Shall we proclaim mountain climbing illegal
next? Even with the libraries full of safety regulations in effect,
people continue to die by the thousands annually in automobile
accidents. It seems logical that the government should outlaw these
fiendish instruments of mass destruction. In 2000,[1]there were 3,482
unintentional drownings in the United States, an average of nine people
per day. This does not include those who drowned in boating-related
incidents. Should steps be taken to protect our citizens from that
deadly liquid H2O?

[1]http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/factsheets/drown.htm

JaR
Libertarian Thug

billyw
Mon May 10 14:00:05 CDT 2004

especially middle eastern teenagers


"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:%23xdWPmrNEHA.3124@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > bet they look suspicious though
>
> How has that different from before? Teenagers look suspicious too.
>
>

billyw
Mon May 10 14:02:00 CDT 2004

i like this man's thinking..

btw made your recipe... twas good

now going to make a pibil just trying to get a hold of achiota paste


"JaR" <plentenospam@nospamsofthome.net> wrote in message
news:e5yKu0rNEHA.128@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> Jtyc opined, On 5/10/04 11:10 AM:
>
> >>Freedom to pass through a metal detector and be frisked before entering
> >>public buildings.
> >>Freedom to the above plus identity screening before boarding an
airplane.
> >
> >
> > I think having no security is as bad an idea as having too much.
> >
>
> You asked billyw which freedoms you had lost recently. Whether you
> regret the loss or not is irrelevant, they are now a fact in this
> country. Personally, however, having to undergo a search of my person
> before being permitted to enter City Hall is repugnant to me. It seems a
> violation of every aspect of the freedoms our forefathers fought for.
> Security be damned!
>
> >
> >
> >>Freedom to wear seatbelts when I drive because I need sombody to look
> >>after my safety, I can't do it myself.
> >>Freedom to wear a helmet when I ride my bicycle for the same reason.
> >
> >
> > I agree these are pointless laws. If people are too stupid to buckle up
or
> > put on a helmet, so be it. Are those laws exclusive to the US?
> >
>
> The exclusivity or not of the laws, again, is irrelevant. This country
> was founded upon the principle of self-determination. That includes the
> right to auto-Darwinate. Shall we proclaim mountain climbing illegal
> next? Even with the libraries full of safety regulations in effect,
> people continue to die by the thousands annually in automobile
> accidents. It seems logical that the government should outlaw these
> fiendish instruments of mass destruction. In 2000,[1]there were 3,482
> unintentional drownings in the United States, an average of nine people
> per day. This does not include those who drowned in boating-related
> incidents. Should steps be taken to protect our citizens from that
> deadly liquid H2O?
>
> [1]http://www.cdc.gov/ncipc/factsheets/drown.htm
>
> JaR
> Libertarian Thug

billyw
Mon May 10 14:02:37 CDT 2004

ah but you can't buy haggis... commies

btw i sent same today... wonder if your freedom loving gov will allow thru

"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eDl6aorNEHA.624@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > Freedom to pass through a metal detector and be frisked before entering
> > public buildings.
> > Freedom to the above plus identity screening before boarding an
airplane.
>
> I think having no security is as bad an idea as having too much.
>
>
> > Freedom to wear seatbelts when I drive because I need sombody to look
> > after my safety, I can't do it myself.
> > Freedom to wear a helmet when I ride my bicycle for the same reason.
>
> I agree these are pointless laws. If people are too stupid to buckle up
or
> put on a helmet, so be it. Are those laws exclusive to the US?
>
>
>
>

Jtyc
Mon May 10 14:02:52 CDT 2004

> Security be damned!

I was being screened at the airport already. I am still free to fly and I
am still free to enter public buildings. If you don't believe in security
checks, what is your recommendation for protecting the public? It sounds
like you believe in doing nothing, is that correct?


> The exclusivity or not of the laws, again, is irrelevant.
> Should steps be taken to protect our citizens from that
> deadly liquid H2O?

Seatbelt and helmet laws came into effect long before the Patriot Act so I
am not sure that I understand how they tie in to the topic. And I already
said I agree with you on those types of laws.

JaR
Mon May 10 14:15:23 CDT 2004

billyw opined, On 5/10/04 12:02 PM:

> i like this man's thinking..

>
> btw made your recipe... twas good


Glad you like it. I made a batch for a NASCAR party last week. Fun
watching the uninitiated sweat.

>
> now going to make a pibil just trying to get a hold of achiota paste
>

Here ya go;

http://www.gourmetsleuth.com/pDetail.asp?p=393

JaR
Gourmet Thug

Jtyc
Mon May 10 14:21:03 CDT 2004

> ah but you can't buy haggis... commies
> btw i sent same today... wonder if your freedom loving gov will allow thru

That law was put into place last century. It's one of those laws that no
one pays any attention to and they forget about it. We have thousands of
those laws in this country. It would be one of the first things I would
clean up if I were king.

JaR
Mon May 10 14:35:16 CDT 2004

Jtyc opined, On 5/10/04 12:02 PM:

>>Security be damned!
>
>
> I was being screened at the airport already. I am still free to fly and I
> am still free to enter public buildings. If you don't believe in security
> checks, what is your recommendation for protecting the public? It sounds
> like you believe in doing nothing, is that correct?
>

No, it's not. There are ways to 'protect the public' without unwarranted
searches. A great start would be to join the seperate fiefdoms of the
NSA, CIA, FBI, and the rest of the alphabet soup of government agencies
into one entity, and eliminate the breakdown of communications that the
Homeland Security Dept was supposed to address. I could go on, but it's
not germaine to this discussion. The point was that we have given away
many of our freedoms over the course of the last generation, and the
idea that continuing to do so as a matter of protecting the public sould
not ever be _okay_ with any American. The opposite has occurred since
9/11 with more Americans than ever willing, like you to forego the right
of protection from unwarranted search and seizure. If we can't enter a
public building without agreeing to this violation of our rights, then
we obviously 'Have Something To Hide', right? The whole excercise at
airports is a case of the barn door being closed after the horse has
long left the area, anyway. It exists solely to prove that our
politicians, etc. have 'Done Something'? Yes, you had screening at
airports before, but not like now. You wanna know something else? You
could still get a sharp and pointy object on a plane if you really
wanted to. No box-cutters? Have you seen the new line of ceramic knives,
sir? Want to bring down an airliner? Has m'sieu been shown this lovely
little Cessna 150? Flying it into the landing path of a 747 ought to be
efficatious. And impossible to prevent, I daresay. Load the backseat
with Semtex for bonus points.

>
>
>>The exclusivity or not of the laws, again, is irrelevant.
>>Should steps be taken to protect our citizens from that
>>deadly liquid H2O?
>
>
> Seatbelt and helmet laws came into effect long before the Patriot Act so I
> am not sure that I understand how they tie in to the topic. And I already
> said I agree with you on those types of laws.
>
>

Correct, these laws were in effect before the so-called Patriot Act.
They do not tie into the discussion other than as an example of the
intrusiveness of government legislation. Mea culpa.

JaR
Argumentative Thug

billyw
Mon May 10 14:42:41 CDT 2004

oh no one pays attention to it do they...

i can say different

"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:O9SSwPsNEHA.3476@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> > ah but you can't buy haggis... commies
> > btw i sent same today... wonder if your freedom loving gov will allow
thru
>
> That law was put into place last century. It's one of those laws that no
> one pays any attention to and they forget about it. We have thousands of
> those laws in this country. It would be one of the first things I would
> clean up if I were king.
>
>
>

Jtyc
Mon May 10 15:02:05 CDT 2004

> A great start would be to join the seperate fiefdoms

They are trying. But I wouldn't blame the goverment for being the
goverment. Having worked for the goverment, I can tell you with great
certainty that getting anything done within the goverment is no easy task.

>The point was that we have given away many of our freedoms over the course
of the last generation

I agree with the things you have pointed out in regards to personally
resposibility. You shouldn't have to regulate something that should be
common sense.

> 9/11 with more Americans than ever willing, like you to forego the right
> of protection from unwarranted search and seizure

Before you go throwing around your incorrect assumptions about me, let me be
clear: I do not support unwarrented search and seizure and goverment freely
intruding into my life without cause.

As I have stated before, when I went through the Patriot Act, it says
nothing about you giving up those rights. It amends other laws but nowhere
does it state the that goverment can freely intrude without just cause. It
still says that they have to go through a judge.

> If we can't enter a public building without agreeing to this violation of
our rights, then
> we obviously 'Have Something To Hide', right?

So you are saying that people should be able to freely come and go in public
buildings? What about the White House, would you have any security there?

> The whole excercise at airports..

So you would get rid of airport security? Or you would just put it back to
where it was?

Jtyc
Mon May 10 15:04:07 CDT 2004

> oh no one pays attention to it do they...
> i can say different

Let me clarify myself. What I mean is, the law is still in place because no
one bothers with the effort to get rid of it. It has no value anymore but
no one is taking up the charge to remove it.

billyw
Mon May 10 15:04:00 CDT 2004

cheers

i can get some from london, but costs 6 times as much...

nascar.. dont you get dizzy watching it.. CART (3 years ago) was better and
F1 (5 years ago) was better


"JaR" <plentenospam@nospamsofthome.net> wrote in message
news:uCYtJLsNEHA.2976@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> billyw opined, On 5/10/04 12:02 PM:
>
> > i like this man's thinking..
>
> >
> > btw made your recipe... twas good
>
>
> Glad you like it. I made a batch for a NASCAR party last week. Fun
> watching the uninitiated sweat.
>
> >
> > now going to make a pibil just trying to get a hold of achiota paste
> >
>
> Here ya go;
>
> http://www.gourmetsleuth.com/pDetail.asp?p=393
>
> JaR
> Gourmet Thug

Radio
Mon May 10 15:07:21 CDT 2004

We're going to end up with an RFID tag inplanted under our
skin on our forhead or our right hand with some type of
symbol representing the value '666'...blah blah blah.

One
Mon May 10 15:08:13 CDT 2004

We're going to end up with one agency? Huh! We're going
to end up with one world government!

JaR
Mon May 10 15:23:45 CDT 2004

billyw opined, On 5/10/04 1:04 PM:

> cheers
>
> i can get some from london, but costs 6 times as much...
>
> nascar.. dont you get dizzy watching it.. CART (3 years ago) was better and
> F1 (5 years ago) was better
>

Naw, the whole point to watching the 'roundy pounders' is seeing the old
boys trade paint. 'Pedal to the metal & turn left' gets real fun at 190+
MPH with 500 cu in unmuffled engines thundering by.

That being said, I loved watching FI and CART, too, but they all seem
kind of, erm...civilized, compared to NASCAR.

JaR
Uncivilized Thug

Neil
Tue May 11 06:31:11 CDT 2004

JaR <plentenospam@nospamsofthome.net> wrote in news:eVrsWxsNEHA.2708
@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:

> JaR
> Uncivilized Thug

not really a suprise...

do you deep fry your thanksgiving turkey?

;)

--
Neil MCNGP #30
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

JaR
Tue May 11 12:03:35 CDT 2004

Neil opined, On 5/11/04 4:31 AM:

> JaR <plentenospam@nospamsofthome.net> wrote in news:eVrsWxsNEHA.2708
> @TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
>
>
>>JaR
>>Uncivilized Thug
>
>
> not really a suprise...
>
> do you deep fry your thanksgiving turkey?
>
> ;)
>

F'knay!

JaR
Thug #375º

Neil
Tue May 11 12:24:21 CDT 2004

JaR <plentenospam@nospamsofthome.net> wrote in news:eUwtKm3NEHA.3556
@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:

> Neil opined, On 5/11/04 4:31 AM:
>
>> JaR <plentenospam@nospamsofthome.net> wrote in news:eVrsWxsNEHA.2708
>> @TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
>>
>>
>>>JaR
>>>Uncivilized Thug
>>
>>
>> not really a suprise...
>>
>> do you deep fry your thanksgiving turkey?
>>
>> ;)
>>
>
> F'knay!
>
> JaR
> Thug #375º
>

plus side is you only have to wait 15 minutes for dinner instead of 6
hours...

--
Neil MCNGP #30
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

plente
Tue May 11 12:53:58 CDT 2004

On Tue, 11 May 2004 10:24:21 -0700, Neil wrote:
>>>
>>> do you deep fry your thanksgiving turkey?
>>>
>>> ;)
>>>
>>
>> F'knay!
>>
>> JaR
>> Thug #375º
>>
>
> plus side is you only have to wait 15 minutes for dinner instead of 6
> hours...

~4min per lb, actually. But you get the idea.

Mmmm...turkey!

JaR
Hungry Thug

billyw
Tue May 11 12:59:55 CDT 2004

not a big fan of turkey.. too dry...

"plente" <Nunyobidness@softhome.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.05.11.17.53.58.410110@softhome.net...
> On Tue, 11 May 2004 10:24:21 -0700, Neil wrote:
> >>>
> >>> do you deep fry your thanksgiving turkey?
> >>>
> >>> ;)
> >>>
> >>
> >> F'knay!
> >>
> >> JaR
> >> Thug #375º
> >>
> >
> > plus side is you only have to wait 15 minutes for dinner instead of 6
> > hours...
>
> ~4min per lb, actually. But you get the idea.
>
> Mmmm...turkey!
>
> JaR
> Hungry Thug

Neil
Tue May 11 13:15:08 CDT 2004

"billyw" <b@brainless.net> wrote in news:OitC#G4NEHA.2468
@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl:

> not a big fan of turkey.. too dry...

having actaully had red-neck turkey (deepfried) I can attest to it being
excellent and not dry at all.

--
Neil MCNGP #30
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

J
Tue May 11 13:21:06 CDT 2004

On Tue, 11 May 2004 18:59:55 +0100, billyw extemporised:

> not a big fan of turkey.. too dry...
>

If it's dry, you ain't cooking it right. Besides, that is the single
greatest thing about deep frying one. You never believe how juicy a turkey
can be 'till you deep fry one!

Ah swar y'all!

JaR
Juicy Thug

Neil
Tue May 11 13:28:32 CDT 2004

"J.R. Jones" <Nunyobidness@softhome.net> wrote in
news:pan.2004.05.11.18.21.06.54866@softhome.net:

>
> Ah swar y'all!

your house is on wheels and your truck is on blocks, right?

does your family tree fork?

did your Dad walk you to school 'cuase you were in the same grade?

do you think a great place to meet chicks is at the family reunion?

--
Neil MCNGP #30
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

J
Tue May 11 13:45:58 CDT 2004

On Tue, 11 May 2004 11:28:32 -0700, Neil extemporised:

> "J.R. Jones" <Nunyobidness@softhome.net> wrote in
> news:pan.2004.05.11.18.21.06.54866@softhome.net:
>
>>
>> Ah swar y'all!
>
> your house is on wheels and your truck is on blocks, right?
>
> does your family tree fork?
>
> did your Dad walk you to school 'cuase you were in the same grade?
>
> do you think a great place to meet chicks is at the family reunion?

Tsk. I think y'all needs more eddyficashun.

http://mytrailerpark.com/

JaR
Trashy Thug

Jtyc
Tue May 11 13:50:41 CDT 2004

How come when I right clicked it formatted my C: drive?? That was'nt cool
man...

JaR
Tue May 11 14:05:01 CDT 2004

On Tue, 11 May 2004 11:50:41 -0700, Jtyc extemporised:

> How come when I right clicked it formatted my C: drive?? That was'nt cool
> man...

You ran java that you got from a trailer park?

Heh.

JaR
SafeHex Thug

Neil
Tue May 11 15:30:12 CDT 2004

"J.R. Jones" <Nunyobidness@softhome.net> wrote in
news:pan.2004.05.11.18.45.57.845447@softhome.net:

>
> http://mytrailerpark.com/

LMAO!

--
Neil MCNGP #30
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

Brat
Wed May 12 07:35:49 CDT 2004

lol that's because of the grease it sits in while cooking

--
Sue MCNGP #69
Proud member since April 8, 2002
"J.R. Jones" <Nunyobidness@softhome.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.05.11.18.21.06.54866@softhome.net...
> On Tue, 11 May 2004 18:59:55 +0100, billyw extemporised:
>
> > not a big fan of turkey.. too dry...
> >
>
> If it's dry, you ain't cooking it right. Besides, that is the single
> greatest thing about deep frying one. You never believe how juicy a turkey
> can be 'till you deep fry one!
>
> Ah swar y'all!
>
> JaR
> Juicy Thug

JaR
Wed May 12 11:47:35 CDT 2004

On Wed, 12 May 2004 12:35:49 +0000, Brat extemporised:

> lol that's because of the grease it sits in while cooking

Ummm, no. It's because the hot oil seals the juices in. Have you never had
deep fried chicken?

Furrfu! I know Newfoundland is not known for it's cuisine, but...

JaR
Patient Thug

Brat
Wed May 12 11:52:48 CDT 2004

yeah you keep thinkin that... lol I still say it is because it is soaked in
grease :P

--
Sue MCNGP #69
Proud member since April 8, 2002
"JaR" <Nunyobidness@softhome.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.05.12.16.47.35.277923@softhome.net...
> On Wed, 12 May 2004 12:35:49 +0000, Brat extemporised:
>
> > lol that's because of the grease it sits in while cooking
>
> Ummm, no. It's because the hot oil seals the juices in. Have you never had
> deep fried chicken?
>
> Furrfu! I know Newfoundland is not known for it's cuisine, but...
>
> JaR
> Patient Thug

Neil
Wed May 12 11:55:01 CDT 2004

"Brat" <likeIwouldtellyou@inyourdreams.com> wrote in news:FSooc.38933
$Np3.1539702@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca:

> lol that's because of the grease it sits in while cooking

don't laugh Sue, red-neck turkey is good eatin'.

*shudder*

I almost said "y'all"....

--
Neil MCNGP #30
"you'd do what, to who, for how many deep-fried turkeys?"

Brat
Wed May 12 12:16:27 CDT 2004

I've done a red-neck (lol) but never been one :P

--
Sue MCNGP #69
Proud member since April 8, 2002
"Neil" <neilmcse@nospamforyou.com> wrote in message
news:Xns94E783665A3B8neilmcsehotmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> "Brat" <likeIwouldtellyou@inyourdreams.com> wrote in news:FSooc.38933
> $Np3.1539702@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca:
>
> > lol that's because of the grease it sits in while cooking
>
> don't laugh Sue, red-neck turkey is good eatin'.
>
> *shudder*
>
> I almost said "y'all"....
>
> --
> Neil MCNGP #30
> "you'd do what, to who, for how many deep-fried turkeys?"

JaR
Wed May 12 12:16:03 CDT 2004

On Wed, 12 May 2004 16:52:48 +0000, Brat extemporised:

> yeah you keep thinkin that... lol I still say it is because it is soaked in
> grease :P

No problem. As long as you are not doing any of the cooking at the MCNGP
picnic. *shudder*

JaR
Chef Thug

Jtyc
Wed May 12 12:19:43 CDT 2004

> I've done a red-neck (lol) but never been one :P

I uh... hmm... nevermind.

Brat
Wed May 12 13:29:03 CDT 2004

you wouldnt want my roast beef? cooked in its own juices with chunks of
onion and spices and gravy so it turns flavorful and moist? well ok... I'll
bring the hotdogs :P

--
Sue MCNGP #69
Proud member since April 8, 2002
"JaR" <Nunyobidness@softhome.net> wrote in message
news:pan.2004.05.12.17.16.03.331964@softhome.net...
> On Wed, 12 May 2004 16:52:48 +0000, Brat extemporised:
>
> > yeah you keep thinkin that... lol I still say it is because it is soaked
in
> > grease :P
>
> No problem. As long as you are not doing any of the cooking at the MCNGP
> picnic. *shudder*
>
> JaR
> Chef Thug

Brat
Wed May 12 13:29:17 CDT 2004

lol gotcha

--
Sue MCNGP #69
Proud member since April 8, 2002
"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:Owq5RVEOEHA.3596@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > I've done a red-neck (lol) but never been one :P
>
> I uh... hmm... nevermind.
>
>
>

JaR
Wed May 12 13:35:48 CDT 2004

On Wed, 12 May 2004 18:29:03 +0000, Brat extemporised:

> you wouldnt want my roast beef? cooked in its own juices with chunks of
> onion and spices and gravy so it turns flavorful and moist? well ok... I'll
> bring the hotdogs :P

Sorry. I will be hard pressed to trust the culinary skills of someone that
thinks deep-fried foods should be 'greasy' when done. Yeccchhh!

JaR
Crispy Thug

Jtyc
Wed May 12 13:42:57 CDT 2004

> lol gotcha

Cruelty, thy name is Brat.

Brat
Wed May 12 16:06:52 CDT 2004

lol yeah but it isnt often I make YOU speechless (or typeless??)

--
Sue MCNGP #69
Proud member since April 8, 2002
"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eT6tyDFOEHA.3312@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> > lol gotcha
>
> Cruelty, thy name is Brat.
>
>

Jtyc
Wed May 12 16:11:16 CDT 2004

> lol yeah but it isnt often I make YOU speechless (or typeless??)

so... what are you trying to say about me? Are you saying I talk to much?

billyw
Wed May 12 16:19:58 CDT 2004

that would be too much..
your grammar is shocking
please learn to spoke proper englund

"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:eP99qWGOEHA.3816@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> > lol yeah but it isnt often I make YOU speechless (or typeless??)
>
> so... what are you trying to say about me? Are you saying I talk to
much?
>
>

Jtyc
Wed May 12 16:29:00 CDT 2004

> that would be too much..
> your grammar is shocking
> please learn to spoke proper englund

My apologies Mr. Englishman.








I hope you didn't spit in my food before you sent it.

LnkWizard
Wed May 12 16:40:06 CDT 2004

"Jtyc" <jtyc_mcngp@spamblockerbitch!@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:uCP$kgGOEHA.3420@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > that would be too much..
> > your grammar is shocking
> > please learn to spoke proper englund
>
> My apologies Mr. Englishman.
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> I hope you didn't spit in my food before you sent it.
>
>
If he is true to his heritage, I don't think it is
spitting that you should worry about.

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
LnkWizard MCNGP 2^5

"He who does not test himself is worthless indeed"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---