Re: OT: Ghost 10 by kpg
kpg
Thu Jan 18 09:40:20 CST 2007
Jonathan Roberts <gremln007@diynics.com> wrote in news:uq2FlDpOHHA.2468
@TK2MSFTNGP06.phx.gbl:
> I used a later version that supported USB (not sure if it was 10 or
> earlier). No issues.
10 supports USB, Network, everything, becuase it's windows based, but
10 is more of a "backup" program than a disk cloning program. They
have a Pre-Excecution environment that can be run by booting from
the product cd which supports restoring an image but I'm not sure one
can be made from there.
I know why they changed to this format, to appeal to the great unwahsed
that have no concept of drive cloning and just want a total drive backup
that's easy to use, but I want something that boots clean and is not
tied to a single machine with complex (hence unrelaible) licenseing
schemes.
I can continue with the older DOS based versions, but they won't write
an image to an NTFS drive (can't see 'em) although you can clone NTFS
drives, DOS USB support is possible but requires driver tweaking, so a
generic DOS boot disk with USB support is elusive. Also I'm not sure if
DOS based ghost can see SATA drives or not.
I'm looking at driveimage xml (freeware) run from a BartPE boot disk, if
I can save and restore several times I'll start trusting it more and just
go with that.