In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from Eddierox, I'm
suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE ban on all of his
messages and taunts.

Everyone in agreement?

--
Kat FORMER MCNGP #29

/* Get the facts first. You can distort them later. */

Re: EDDIROX Ban by LnkWizard

LnkWizard
Mon Apr 05 13:02:00 CDT 2004

Sounds like a winner

--
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---
LnkWizard MCNGP 2^5

"He who does not test himself is worthless indeed"
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
---


"kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from Eddierox, I'm
> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE ban on all of his
> messages and taunts.
>
> Everyone in agreement?
>
> --
> Kat FORMER MCNGP #29
>
> /* Get the facts first. You can distort them later. */
>



Re: EDDIROX Ban by Ken

Ken
Mon Apr 05 13:02:01 CDT 2004

"kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from Eddierox, I'm
> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE ban on all of his
> messages and taunts.
>
> Everyone in agreement?

As much fun as I'm having posting nonsensical responses to him, I must say
that I'd be in favor of an anti-eddiepox NG by-law.

--

KB - MCNGP "silent thug" #26

first initial last name AT hotmail DOT com



Re: EDDIROX Ban by TechGeekPro

TechGeekPro
Mon Apr 05 13:04:42 CDT 2004

I WOULD AGREE. I NEVER SEEN ANY POINT IN REPLYING TO HIS MINDLESS DRIBBLE.
WASTE OF TIME.

P.S. Do you like the caps-lock "eddierox"?

--
I may not be fully certified, but I am fully certifiable.

"kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from Eddierox, I'm
> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE ban on all of his
> messages and taunts.
>
> Everyone in agreement?
>
> --
> Kat FORMER MCNGP #29
>
> /* Get the facts first. You can distort them later. */
>



Re: EDDIROX Ban by Neil

Neil
Mon Apr 05 13:04:53 CDT 2004

"LnkWizard" <lnk.wizard.nodots2@hotmail.com> wrote in news:ueQ0YgzGEHA.3488
@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl:

> Sounds like a winner
>

I'm in...

--
Neil
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

Re: EDDIROX Ban by Politician

Politician
Mon Apr 05 13:08:20 CDT 2004

In.

--
Politician Spock
Thug #24601


"LnkWizard" <lnk.wizard.nodots2@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:ueQ0YgzGEHA.3488@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> Sounds like a winner
>
> --
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ---
> LnkWizard MCNGP 2^5
>
> "He who does not test himself is worthless indeed"
> --------------------------------------------------------------------------
--
> ---
>
>
> "kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
> news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
> > In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from Eddierox, I'm
> > suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE ban on all of his
> > messages and taunts.
> >
> > Everyone in agreement?
> >
> > --
> > Kat FORMER MCNGP #29
> >
> > /* Get the facts first. You can distort them later. */
> >
>
>



Re: EDDIROX Ban by Neil

Neil
Mon Apr 05 13:07:18 CDT 2004

Neil <neilmcse@nospamforyou.com> wrote in
news:Xns94C28F3EF7C2Fneilmcsehotmailcom@207.46.248.16:

> "LnkWizard" <lnk.wizard.nodots2@hotmail.com> wrote in
> news:ueQ0YgzGEHA.3488 @TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl:
>
>> Sounds like a winner
>>
>
> I'm in...
>

he be plonked for next 100 days...

--
Neil
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

Re: OT: EDDIROX Ban by JaR

JaR
Mon Apr 05 13:10:01 CDT 2004

kat opined, On 4/5/04 10:46 AM:

> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from Eddierox, I'm
> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE ban on all of his
> messages and taunts.
>
> Everyone in agreement?
>

Yes PLEASE!

Re: EDDIROX Ban by Ken

Ken
Mon Apr 05 13:19:07 CDT 2004

"kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from Eddierox, I'm
> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE ban on all of his
> messages and taunts.
>
> Everyone in agreement?
>

now that we have a few people on board, i'm ready to plonk eddiepox too.
however, if this is done, all anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com addresses
will be plonked. that means no more newbies to torture! but i'm willing to
take that drastic measure if need be.

--

KB - MCNGP "silent thug" #26

first initial last name AT hotmail DOT com



OT: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 13:17:24 CDT 2004


ALL THIS FOR MEEEEE ??????

USE SAID "POSE"...

THIS BOARD IS ALREADY RIFE WITH POSERS.

YOU SEEMED TO HAVE FOUND COMFORT, REFUGE AND REASSURANCE
FROM YOUR FELLOW TROLLS/POSERS...

TRY USING SOME BAN UNDER YOUR ARMPITS...

YOU JUST GOT HERE AND YOU ALREADY STINK!!!!

>-----Original Message-----
>In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from
Eddierox, I'm
>suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE ban
on all of his
>messages and taunts.
>
>Everyone in agreement?
>
>--
>Kat FORMER MCNGP #29
>
>/* Get the facts first. You can distort them later. */
>
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 13:17:55 CDT 2004


***YAWN***

>-----Original Message-----
>"kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
>news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
>> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from
Eddierox, I'm
>> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE
ban on all of his
>> messages and taunts.
>>
>> Everyone in agreement?
>
>As much fun as I'm having posting nonsensical responses
to him, I must say
>that I'd be in favor of an anti-eddiepox NG by-law.
>
>--
>
>KB - MCNGP "silent thug" #26
>
>first initial last name AT hotmail DOT com
>
>
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 13:19:14 CDT 2004


LnkWizard APPEARS!!!!!!!

C'MON GIVE US SOME FOAMING AT THE MOUTH !!!!!!

STRAIN A BIT!!!!!!

>-----Original Message-----
>Sounds like a winner
>
>--
>---------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
>---
>LnkWizard MCNGP 2^5
>
>"He who does not test himself is worthless indeed"
>---------------------------------------------------------
-------------------
>---
>
>
>"kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
>news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
>> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from
Eddierox, I'm
>> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE
ban on all of his
>> messages and taunts.
>>
>> Everyone in agreement?
>>
>> --
>> Kat FORMER MCNGP #29
>>
>> /* Get the facts first. You can distort them later. */
>>
>
>
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by kat

kat
Mon Apr 05 13:21:03 CDT 2004

I think we can all just ignore him. As in, NO posts. Please, don't
spread the virus. Wash your hands!

Ken Briscoe wrote:
> "kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
> news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
>
>>In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from Eddierox, I'm
>>suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE ban on all of his
>>messages and taunts.
>>
>>Everyone in agreement?
>>
>
>
> now that we have a few people on board, i'm ready to plonk eddiepox too.
> however, if this is done, all anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com addresses
> will be plonked. that means no more newbies to torture! but i'm willing to
> take that drastic measure if need be.
>

--
Kat FORMER MCNGP #29

/* Get the facts first. You can distort them later. */


Re: EDDIROX Ban by Neil

Neil
Mon Apr 05 13:22:54 CDT 2004

"Ken Briscoe" <youcant@sendmespam.com> wrote in
news:ui$g3pzGEHA.2876@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:

> "kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
> news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
>> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from Eddierox, I'm
>> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE ban on all of
>> his messages and taunts.
>>
>> Everyone in agreement?
>>
>
> now that we have a few people on board, i'm ready to plonk eddiepox
> too. however, if this is done, all anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com
> addresses will be plonked. that means no more newbies to torture! but
> i'm willing to take that drastic measure if need be.
>

no, I just thought of that too. removed plonk. I will just ignore it in
hopes it goes away...

--
Neil
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

Re: OT: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 13:24:01 CDT 2004


JaR APPEARS!!!!

Insignificant Thug

>-----Original Message-----
>kat opined, On 4/5/04 10:46 AM:
>
>> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from
Eddierox, I'm
>> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE
ban on all of his
>> messages and taunts.
>>
>> Everyone in agreement?
>>
>
>Yes PLEASE!
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by Andy

Andy
Mon Apr 05 13:26:43 CDT 2004

"kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from Eddierox, I'm
> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE ban on all of his
> messages and taunts.
>
> Everyone in agreement?
>

Count me in



Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 13:25:55 CDT 2004


WHO TAUGHT YOU GRAMMAR?????
"...I NEVER SEEN..."???????


>-----Original Message-----
>I WOULD AGREE. I NEVER SEEN ANY POINT IN REPLYING TO HIS
MINDLESS DRIBBLE.
>WASTE OF TIME.
>
>P.S. Do you like the caps-lock "eddierox"?
>
>--
>I may not be fully certified, but I am fully certifiable.
>
>"kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
>news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
>> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from
Eddierox, I'm
>> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE
ban on all of his
>> messages and taunts.
>>
>> Everyone in agreement?
>>
>> --
>> Kat FORMER MCNGP #29
>>
>> /* Get the facts first. You can distort them later. */
>>
>
>
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 13:29:46 CDT 2004


Is Ken Briscoe "eddierox" ?

I'M OFFENDED.

WE CAN SEE THAT KEN BRISCOE AMONGST HIS MANY EXPLOITS,
THAT HIS CHIEF EXPLOIT IS TO FIND COMFORT, REFUGE AND
REASSURANCE AMONGST HIS FELLOW TROLLS/POSERS.

WAHHHHHHHHHHHH !!!!!!!!

>-----Original Message-----
>"kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
>news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
>> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from
Eddierox, I'm
>> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE
ban on all of his
>> messages and taunts.
>>
>> Everyone in agreement?
>>
>
>now that we have a few people on board, i'm ready to
plonk eddiepox too.
>however, if this is done, all
anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com addresses
>will be plonked. that means no more newbies to torture!
but i'm willing to
>take that drastic measure if need be.
>
>--
>
>KB - MCNGP "silent thug" #26
>
>first initial last name AT hotmail DOT com
>
>
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 13:44:02 CDT 2004


WHO ARE YOU???


>-----Original Message-----
>"kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
>news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
>> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from
Eddierox, I'm
>> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE
ban on all of his
>> messages and taunts.
>>
>> Everyone in agreement?
>>
>
>Count me in
>
>
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 13:45:56 CDT 2004


THE SMELL OF BAN UNDER YOUR ARMPITS OFFENDS YOU HUH????

>-----Original Message-----
>I think we can all just ignore him. As in, NO posts.
Please, don't
>spread the virus. Wash your hands!
>
>Ken Briscoe wrote:
>> "kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
>> news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
>>
>>>In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from
Eddierox, I'm
>>>suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE
ban on all of his
>>>messages and taunts.
>>>
>>>Everyone in agreement?
>>>
>>
>>
>> now that we have a few people on board, i'm ready to
plonk eddiepox too.
>> however, if this is done, all
anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com addresses
>> will be plonked. that means no more newbies to
torture! but i'm willing to
>> take that drastic measure if need be.
>>
>
>--
>Kat FORMER MCNGP #29
>
>/* Get the facts first. You can distort them later. */
>
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 13:47:36 CDT 2004


...BETTER LISTEN TO 'EM!!!!
...WE'RE RUNNING OUT OF ZOLOFT..
C'MON STRAIN A BIT!!!!!!!!

>-----Original Message-----
>"Ken Briscoe" <youcant@sendmespam.com> wrote in
>news:ui$g3pzGEHA.2876@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>
>> "kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
>> news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
>>> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from
Eddierox, I'm
>>> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE
ban on all of
>>> his messages and taunts.
>>>
>>> Everyone in agreement?
>>>
>>
>> now that we have a few people on board, i'm ready to
plonk eddiepox
>> too. however, if this is done, all
anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com
>> addresses will be plonked. that means no more newbies
to torture! but
>> i'm willing to take that drastic measure if need be.
>>
>
>no, I just thought of that too. removed plonk. I will
just ignore it in
>hopes it goes away...
>
>--
>Neil
>"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by kpg

kpg
Mon Apr 05 14:39:07 CDT 2004

"kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from Eddierox, I'm
> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE ban on all of his
> messages and taunts.
>
> Everyone in agreement?
>
> --
> Kat FORMER MCNGP #29
>
> /* Get the facts first. You can distort them later. */
>

*** YAWN ***

From this day forward let no man speak the name of (the unmentionable one).

Let his name be stricken from all records and monuments.

Let it be written. Let it be done.

kpg
(hey look, i didn't top post! That's so weird.)



Re: EDDIROX Ban by Ken

Ken
Mon Apr 05 14:45:01 CDT 2004

"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam.com> wrote in message
news:%23xYSxW0GEHA.2612@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> *** YAWN ***
>
> From this day forward let no man speak the name of (the unmentionable
one).
>
> Let his name be stricken from all records and monuments.
>
> Let it be written. Let it be done.
>
> kpg
> (hey look, i didn't top post! That's so weird.)

knock on wood, but so far it seems to be working.

*eerie silence*

--

KB - MCNGP "silent thug" #26

first initial last name AT hotmail DOT com



Re: EDDIROX Ban by billLASTINIT

billLASTINIT
Mon Apr 05 14:45:33 CDT 2004

kpg wrote:
> "kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
> news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
>> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from Eddierox, I'm
>> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE ban on all of
>> his messages and taunts.
>>
>> Everyone in agreement?
>>
>> --
>> Kat FORMER MCNGP #29
>>
>> /* Get the facts first. You can distort them later. */
>>
>
> *** YAWN ***
>
> From this day forward let no man speak the name of (the unmentionable
> one).
>
> Let his name be stricken from all records and monuments.
>
> Let it be written. Let it be done.
>
> kpg
> (hey look, i didn't top post! That's so weird.)

What I do, I was compelled to do.

--
Fris "et cetera, et cetera, et cetera" bee®

Certaholics
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/certaholics


Re: EDDIROX Ban by JaR

JaR
Mon Apr 05 14:48:26 CDT 2004

Ken Briscoe opined, On 4/5/04 12:45 PM:

> "kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam.com> wrote in message
> news:%23xYSxW0GEHA.2612@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>
>>*** YAWN ***
>>
>>From this day forward let no man speak the name of (the unmentionable
>
> one).
>
>>Let his name be stricken from all records and monuments.
>>
>>Let it be written. Let it be done.
>>
>>kpg
>>(hey look, i didn't top post! That's so weird.)
>
>
> knock on wood, but so far it seems to be working.
>
> *eerie silence*
>

*crosses fingers*

Re: EDDIROX Ban by Neil

Neil
Mon Apr 05 14:46:53 CDT 2004

"Ken Briscoe" <youcant@sendmespam.com> wrote in news:O66c3Z0GEHA.1272
@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl:

> knock on wood, but so far it seems to be working.
>
> *eerie silence*

shhhhh...I was finally getting some sleep under my desk ala George....

--
Neil
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

Re: EDDIROX Ban by The

The
Mon Apr 05 14:48:34 CDT 2004

>From this day forward let no man speak the name of (the unmentionable one).

Who?

Kline Sphere (Chalk) MCNGP #3

Re: EDDIROX Ban by Neil

Neil
Mon Apr 05 14:50:39 CDT 2004

"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam.com> wrote in news:#xYSxW0GEHA.2612
@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:

> Let it be written. Let it be done.

and kgp shall henceforth be known as Ramsesses

so let it be written, so let it be done...

--
Neil
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

Re: EDDIROX Ban by Neil

Neil
Mon Apr 05 14:52:50 CDT 2004

The Poster Formerly Known as Kline Sphere <.> wrote in
news:c0e370p2pklc4208s43ctfuajh9j41qvk5@4ax.com:

>>From this day forward let no man speak the name of (the unmentionable
>>one).
>
> Who?
>
> Kline Sphere (Chalk) MCNGP #3

correct

--
Neil
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

Re: EDDIROX Ban by kpg

kpg
Mon Apr 05 14:54:57 CDT 2004

Yul Brenner and I share a trait.

Can you guess what it is?

kpg

"Neil" <neilmcse@nospamforyou.com> wrote in message
news:Xns94C2A12D87C91neilmcsehotmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> "kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam.com> wrote in news:#xYSxW0GEHA.2612
> @TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>
> > Let it be written. Let it be done.
>
> and kgp shall henceforth be known as Ramsesses
>
> so let it be written, so let it be done...
>
> --
> Neil
> "you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"



Re: EDDIROX Ban by The

The
Mon Apr 05 14:55:00 CDT 2004

>and kgp shall henceforth be known as Ramsesses
>
>so let it be written, so let it be done...

Amen

Kline Sphere (Chalk) MCNGP #3

Re: EDDIROX Ban by billLASTINIT

billLASTINIT
Mon Apr 05 14:58:42 CDT 2004

kpg wrote:
> Yul Brenner and I share a trait.
>
> Can you guess what it is?

I have more hair than Yul. I suspect you do, too.


Re: EDDIROX Ban by The

The
Mon Apr 05 14:59:41 CDT 2004

>Yul Brenner and I share a trait.
>
>Can you guess what it is?

Died of lung cancer? (hopefully not)

or

Boldness!!!

Kline Sphere (Chalk) MCNGP #3

Re: EDDIROX Ban by Neil

Neil
Mon Apr 05 15:00:19 CDT 2004

"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam.com> wrote in news:#P6cof0GEHA.3788
@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:

>
> Yul Brenner and I share a trait.
>
> Can you guess what it is?
>
> kpg

Lung cancer?

<nyuk,nyuk,nyuk>

--
Neil
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

Re: EDDIROX Ban by Neil

Neil
Mon Apr 05 15:02:29 CDT 2004

The Poster Formerly Known as Kline Sphere <.> wrote in
news:ece370l6oi5ejneandpqpi95gsrtcs4857@4ax.com:

>>and kgp shall henceforth be known as Ramsesses
>>
>>so let it be written, so let it be done...
>
> Amen
>
> Kline Sphere (Chalk) MCNGP #3
>

..and darkness fell, and God did reign upon the land the last of the
great plagues..the eddiepox....

--
Neil
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

Re: EDDIROX Ban by Neil

Neil
Mon Apr 05 15:06:45 CDT 2004

Neil <neilmcse@nospamforyou.com> wrote in
news:Xns94C2A2D0D7AAneilmcsehotmailcom@207.46.248.16:

> "kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam.com> wrote in news:#P6cof0GEHA.3788
> @TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>
>>
>> Yul Brenner and I share a trait.
>>
>> Can you guess what it is?
>>
>> kpg
>
> Lung cancer?
>
> <nyuk,nyuk,nyuk>
>

do you wear silky baggy pants and put your hands on your hips?

have you been a robot in a western theme park?

--
Neil
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

Re: EDDIROX Ban by kpg

kpg
Mon Apr 05 15:08:30 CDT 2004

No. I quit my three pack a day habit about 15 years ago.

Hint: It's big and when I take it out in the sunlight it's really shiny.

kpg

"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam.com> wrote in message
news:%23P6cof0GEHA.3788@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Yul Brenner and I share a trait.
>
> Can you guess what it is?
>
> kpg
>
> "Neil" <neilmcse@nospamforyou.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns94C2A12D87C91neilmcsehotmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> > "kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam.com> wrote in news:#xYSxW0GEHA.2612
> > @TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
> >
> > > Let it be written. Let it be done.
> >
> > and kgp shall henceforth be known as Ramsesses
> >
> > so let it be written, so let it be done...
> >
> > --
> > Neil
> > "you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"
>
>



Re: EDDIROX Ban by Neil

Neil
Mon Apr 05 15:12:30 CDT 2004


>
> Hint: It's big and when I take it out in the sunlight it's really shiny.
>
Snip

Janet Jackson's nipple ring?


--
Neil
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

Re: EDDIROX Ban by JaR

JaR
Mon Apr 05 15:15:17 CDT 2004

kpg opined, On 4/5/04 12:54 PM:

> Yul Brenner and I share a trait.
>
> Can you guess what it is?
>

You talk with a funny accent?

Re: EDDIROX Ban by JaR

JaR
Mon Apr 05 15:18:49 CDT 2004

kpg opined, On 4/5/04 1:08 PM:

> No. I quit my three pack a day habit about 15 years ago.
>
> Hint: It's big and when I take it out in the sunlight it's really shiny.
>
Your car?

Re: EDDIROX Ban by kpg

kpg
Mon Apr 05 15:16:09 CDT 2004

We have a winner!

"Neil" <neilmcse@nospamforyou.com> wrote in message
news:Xns94C2A4E124F1Cneilmcsehotmailcom@207.46.248.16...
>
> >
> > Hint: It's big and when I take it out in the sunlight it's really
shiny.
> >
> Snip
>
> Janet Jackson's nipple ring?
>
>
> --
> Neil
> "you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"



Re: EDDIROX Ban by Neil

Neil
Mon Apr 05 15:17:44 CDT 2004

Neil <neilmcse@nospamforyou.com> wrote in
news:Xns94C2A4E124F1Cneilmcsehotmailcom@207.46.248.16:

>
>>
>> Hint: It's big and when I take it out in the sunlight it's really
>> shiny.
>>
> Snip
>
> Janet Jackson's nipple ring?
>
>

A gun? A vibrator? Silver tea service? new car? Hat made of old CDs?

--
Neil
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

Re: EDDIROX Ban by Neil

Neil
Mon Apr 05 15:18:34 CDT 2004

JaR <plentenospam@nospamsofthome.net> wrote in news:uJE34p0GEHA.712
@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl:

>
> You talk with a funny accent?

it was a given...

--
Neil
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

Re: EDDIROX Ban by Marlin

Marlin
Mon Apr 05 15:22:07 CDT 2004

On Mon, 5 Apr 2004 14:54:57 -0500, "kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam.com>
wrote:

>Yul Brenner and I share a trait.
>
>Can you guess what it is?
>
>kpg
>

What, you bore people 5h1tless on English TV at Christmas time
????!!!!!


================================
My Hero:
http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/30/index.html
(remove vroomfondle to email me)
================================

Re: EDDIROX Ban by Neil

Neil
Mon Apr 05 15:21:14 CDT 2004

"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam.com> wrote in news:uDWodr0GEHA.3488
@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl:

> We have a winner!

stop calling me a wiener

--
Neil
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 15:27:01 CDT 2004


RESORTING TO PLAGERIZING "THE TEN COMMANDMENTS" ARE WE?
GETTING DESPERATE ENOUGH TO BLASPHEMY???

I DON'T KNOW...

eddierox


>-----Original Message-----
>"kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
>news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
>> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from
Eddierox, I'm
>> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE
ban on all of his
>> messages and taunts.
>>
>> Everyone in agreement?
>>
>> --
>> Kat FORMER MCNGP #29
>>
>> /* Get the facts first. You can distort them later. */
>>
>
>*** YAWN ***
>
>From this day forward let no man speak the name of (the
unmentionable one).
>
>Let his name be stricken from all records and monuments.
>
>Let it be written. Let it be done.
>
>kpg
>(hey look, i didn't top post! That's so weird.)
>
>
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 15:27:27 CDT 2004


***YAWN***

>-----Original Message-----
>>From this day forward let no man speak the name of (the
unmentionable one).
>
>Who?
>
>Kline Sphere (Chalk) MCNGP #3
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 15:29:29 CDT 2004


...TOO LATE...
YOU'VE BEEN ACCUSED OF BEING EDDIEROX...

YOU'VE NEITHER THE STYLE NOR THE CLASS TO BE ME...

SO...

STRAIN A BIT!!!!!


>-----Original Message-----
>"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam.com> wrote in message
>news:%23xYSxW0GEHA.2612@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> *** YAWN ***
>>
>> From this day forward let no man speak the name of
(the unmentionable
>one).
>>
>> Let his name be stricken from all records and
monuments.
>>
>> Let it be written. Let it be done.
>>
>> kpg
>> (hey look, i didn't top post! That's so weird.)
>
>knock on wood, but so far it seems to be working.
>
>*eerie silence*
>
>--
>
>KB - MCNGP "silent thug" #26
>
>first initial last name AT hotmail DOT com
>
>
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 15:30:11 CDT 2004


JaR
IGNORANT THUG

>-----Original Message-----
>Ken Briscoe opined, On 4/5/04 12:45 PM:
>
>> "kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam.com> wrote in message
>> news:%23xYSxW0GEHA.2612@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>>
>>>*** YAWN ***
>>>
>>>From this day forward let no man speak the name of
(the unmentionable
>>
>> one).
>>
>>>Let his name be stricken from all records and
monuments.
>>>
>>>Let it be written. Let it be done.
>>>
>>>kpg
>>>(hey look, i didn't top post! That's so weird.)
>>
>>
>> knock on wood, but so far it seems to be working.
>>
>> *eerie silence*
>>
>
>*crosses fingers*
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 15:32:00 CDT 2004


I THOUGHT YOU WERE GOING TO CHANGE YOUR HANDLE SO AS TO=20
NOT DESECRATE THE ONE TRUE AND HOLY FRISBEE?

>-----Original Message-----
>kpg wrote:
>> "kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
>> news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
>>> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from=20
Eddierox, I'm
>>> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE=20
ban on all of
>>> his messages and taunts.
>>>
>>> Everyone in agreement?
>>>
>>> --
>>> Kat FORMER MCNGP #29
>>>
>>> /* Get the facts first. You can distort them later. */
>>>
>>
>> *** YAWN ***
>>
>> From this day forward let no man speak the name of=20
(the unmentionable
>> one).
>>
>> Let his name be stricken from all records and=20
monuments.
>>
>> Let it be written. Let it be done.
>>
>> kpg
>> (hey look, i didn't top post! That's so weird.)
>
>What I do, I was compelled to do.
>
>--=20
>Fris "et cetera, et cetera, et cetera" bee=AE
>
>Certaholics
>http://groups.yahoo.com/group/certaholics
>
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 15:33:15 CDT 2004


YOU NEED KPG JELLY TO F**K NEFFRETTITI?

>-----Original Message-----
>Yul Brenner and I share a trait.
>
>Can you guess what it is?
>
>kpg
>
>"Neil" <neilmcse@nospamforyou.com> wrote in message
>news:Xns94C2A12D87C91neilmcsehotmailcom@207.46.248.16...
>> "kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam.com> wrote in
news:#xYSxW0GEHA.2612
>> @TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>>
>> > Let it be written. Let it be done.
>>
>> and kgp shall henceforth be known as Ramsesses
>>
>> so let it be written, so let it be done...
>>
>> --
>> Neil
>> "you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"
>
>
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 15:33:43 CDT 2004


***YAWN***

>-----Original Message-----
>>Yul Brenner and I share a trait.
>>
>>Can you guess what it is?
>
>Died of lung cancer? (hopefully not)
>
>or
>
>Boldness!!!
>
>Kline Sphere (Chalk) MCNGP #3
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 15:34:46 CDT 2004


FROM MY VANTAGE POINT YOU SHARE THE TRAIT OF DOWNS
SYNDROME!!!!

>-----Original Message-----
>kpg wrote:
>> Yul Brenner and I share a trait.
>>
>> Can you guess what it is?
>
>I have more hair than Yul. I suspect you do, too.
>
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 15:35:33 CDT 2004


...A TUBE OF KPG JELLY !!!!

>-----Original Message-----
>No. I quit my three pack a day habit about 15 years ago.
>
>Hint: It's big and when I take it out in the sunlight
it's really shiny.
>
>kpg
>
>"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam.com> wrote in message
>news:%23P6cof0GEHA.3788@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> Yul Brenner and I share a trait.
>>
>> Can you guess what it is?
>>
>> kpg
>>
>> "Neil" <neilmcse@nospamforyou.com> wrote in message
>>
news:Xns94C2A12D87C91neilmcsehotmailcom@207.46.248.16...
>> > "kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam.com> wrote in
news:#xYSxW0GEHA.2612
>> > @TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>> >
>> > > Let it be written. Let it be done.
>> >
>> > and kgp shall henceforth be known as Ramsesses
>> >
>> > so let it be written, so let it be done...
>> >
>> > --
>> > Neil
>> > "you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"
>>
>>
>
>
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 15:36:06 CDT 2004


***YAWN***

>-----Original Message-----
>
>>
>> Hint: It's big and when I take it out in the sunlight
it's really shiny.
>>
>Snip
>
>Janet Jackson's nipple ring?
>
>
>--
>Neil
>"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 15:36:34 CDT 2004


***YAWN***

>-----Original Message-----
>We have a winner!
>
>"Neil" <neilmcse@nospamforyou.com> wrote in message
>news:Xns94C2A4E124F1Cneilmcsehotmailcom@207.46.248.16...
>>
>> >
>> > Hint: It's big and when I take it out in the
sunlight it's really
>shiny.
>> >
>> Snip
>>
>> Janet Jackson's nipple ring?
>>
>>
>> --
>> Neil
>> "you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"
>
>
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 15:37:01 CDT 2004


WHAT A GEEK!!!!!

>-----Original Message-----
>"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam.com> wrote in
news:#P6cof0GEHA.3788
>@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>
>>
>> Yul Brenner and I share a trait.
>>
>> Can you guess what it is?
>>
>> kpg
>
>Lung cancer?
>
><nyuk,nyuk,nyuk>
>
>--
>Neil
>"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 15:38:34 CDT 2004


NO NO NO !!!!
YOU NEED TO SAY IT LIKE IN "BENEATH THE PLANET OF THE
TROLLS..."

"AHHHHHH MENNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNNN !!!!!!!!"

>-----Original Message-----
>>and kgp shall henceforth be known as Ramsesses
>>
>>so let it be written, so let it be done...
>
>Amen
>
>Kline Sphere (Chalk) MCNGP #3
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 15:39:59 CDT 2004


OKAY, THAT'S KIND OF FUNNY!!!!

C'MON STRAIN A BIT!!!!!

>-----Original Message-----
>The Poster Formerly Known as Kline Sphere <.> wrote in
>news:ece370l6oi5ejneandpqpi95gsrtcs4857@4ax.com:
>
>>>and kgp shall henceforth be known as Ramsesses
>>>
>>>so let it be written, so let it be done...
>>
>> Amen
>>
>> Kline Sphere (Chalk) MCNGP #3
>>
>
>...and darkness fell, and God did reign upon the land
the last of the
>great plagues..the eddiepox....
>
>--
>Neil
>"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by Brat

Brat
Mon Apr 05 16:34:03 CDT 2004

hell I've been doing that for about 2 weeks now with 3 exceptions I believe

--
Sue MCNGP #69

"kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from Eddierox, I'm
> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE ban on all of his
> messages and taunts.
>
> Everyone in agreement?
>
> --
> Kat FORMER MCNGP #29
>
> /* Get the facts first. You can distort them later. */
>



Re: EDDIROX Ban by Brat

Brat
Mon Apr 05 16:37:04 CDT 2004


"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam.com> wrote in message
news:%23xYSxW0GEHA.2612@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> "kat" <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in message
> news:40719b75$1@obsidian.gov.bc.ca...
> > In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from Eddierox, I'm
> > suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE ban on all of his
> > messages and taunts.
> >
> > Everyone in agreement?
> >
> > --
> > Kat FORMER MCNGP #29
> >
> > /* Get the facts first. You can distort them later. */
> >
>
> *** YAWN ***
>
> From this day forward let no man speak the name of (the unmentionable
one).
>
> Let his name be stricken from all records and monuments.
>
> Let it be written. Let it be done.

I believe the phrase is So let it be written; So let it be done

>
> kpg
> (hey look, i didn't top post! That's so weird.)
>
>



Re: EDDIROX Ban by Brat

Brat
Mon Apr 05 16:37:35 CDT 2004


"The Poster Formerly Known as Kline Sphere" <.> wrote in message
news:c0e370p2pklc4208s43ctfuajh9j41qvk5@4ax.com...
> >From this day forward let no man speak the name of (the unmentionable
one).
>
> Who?

On first :P


--
Sue MCNGP #69




Re: EDDIROX Ban by kpg

kpg
Mon Apr 05 16:43:28 CDT 2004

Yes. So I've been told.

kp "Trying harder all the time." g



Re: EDDIROX Ban by Brat

Brat
Mon Apr 05 16:49:41 CDT 2004

lol does it help that the "10 Commandments" was on TV last night?

--
Sue MCNGP #69

"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam.com> wrote in message
news:e6CgQc1GEHA.4008@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> Yes. So I've been told.
>
> kp "Trying harder all the time." g
>
>



Re: OT: EDDIROX Ban by Tom

Tom
Mon Apr 05 18:05:33 CDT 2004

What happened to the good old-fashioned "plonk" file???

Kat <eternalbliss@NOSPAM.techie.com> wrote in news:40719b75$1
@obsidian.gov.bc.ca:

> In an attempt to purge the NG of anymore posts from Eddierox, I'm
> suggesting all users of the MCNGP pose a NO RESPONSE ban on all of his
> messages and taunts.
>
> Everyone in agreement?
>


Re: OT: EDDIROX Ban by JaR

JaR
Mon Apr 05 18:39:45 CDT 2004

Tom Kelsall opined, On 4/5/04 4:05 PM:
> What happened to the good old-fashioned "plonk" file???
>

Working fine, TYVM. Some here, however, couldn't resist dragging sticks
across the bars of the troll's cage to watch it foam at the mouth.

Enough is enough.

Re: EDDIROX Ban by Neil

Neil
Mon Apr 05 18:42:17 CDT 2004

"Brat" <likeIwouldtellyou@inyourdreams.com> wrote in news:Vvkcc.11024
$Np3.374703@ursa-nb00s0.nbnet.nb.ca:

> lol does it help that the "10 Commandments" was on TV last night?
>

no, as it postponed "Alias" :(

--
Neil (don't mess with my Rambaldi artifacts)
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

Re: OT: EDDIROX Ban by Neil

Neil
Mon Apr 05 19:03:27 CDT 2004

JaR <plentenospam@nospamsofthome.net> wrote in news:OSzmIc2GEHA.2052
@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl:

> Tom Kelsall opined, On 4/5/04 4:05 PM:
>> What happened to the good old-fashioned "plonk" file???
>>
>
> Working fine, TYVM. Some here, however, couldn't resist dragging sticks
> across the bars of the troll's cage to watch it foam at the mouth.
>
> Enough is enough.
>

It?s the "throwing out the baby with the bathwater" that bothers me. My
plonk file will work fine too. But it will kill all the innocent people
from anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com

--
Neil
"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"

Re: OT: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 19:34:09 CDT 2004


RUN OUT OF ZOLOFT HAVE WE????

>-----Original Message-----
>JaR <plentenospam@nospamsofthome.net> wrote in
news:OSzmIc2GEHA.2052
>@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl:
>
>> Tom Kelsall opined, On 4/5/04 4:05 PM:
>>> What happened to the good old-fashioned "plonk"
file???
>>>
>>
>> Working fine, TYVM. Some here, however, couldn't
resist dragging sticks
>> across the bars of the troll's cage to watch it foam
at the mouth.
>>
>> Enough is enough.
>>
>
>It's the "throwing out the baby with the bathwater" that
bothers me. My
>plonk file will work fine too. But it will kill all the
innocent people
>from anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com
>
>--
>Neil
>"you'd do what, to who, for how many biscuits?"
>.
>

Re: OT: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 19:33:26 CDT 2004


***YAWN***
Ignorant Thug


>-----Original Message-----
>Tom Kelsall opined, On 4/5/04 4:05 PM:
>> What happened to the good old-fashioned "plonk" file???
>>
>
>Working fine, TYVM. Some here, however, couldn't resist
dragging sticks
>across the bars of the troll's cage to watch it foam at
the mouth.
>
>Enough is enough.
>.
>

Re: EDDIROX Ban by eddierox

eddierox
Mon Apr 05 19:36:40 CDT 2004


DUH!!!!!????

>-----Original Message-----
>lol does it help that the "10 Commandments" was on TV
last night?
>
>--
>Sue MCNGP #69
>
>"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam.com> wrote in message
>news:e6CgQc1GEHA.4008@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> Yes. So I've been told.
>>
>> kp "Trying harder all the time." g
>>
>>
>
>
>.
>