We have an all new forum at http://forums.mcngp.com strictly for discussing
certification issues. Hurry on over and be the first to post. Don't delay, do
it now.

--
TGP MCNGP #100100

mcngp.com is better than mcngp.co.uk with updates and a 99% uptime guarantee

You do not really understand something
unless you can explain it to your grandmother.

Re: Certification Discussion by kpg

kpg
Wed Jan 25 13:59:47 CST 2006

TechGeekPro <%username%@gmail.com> said something like

> # Name resolution details: file://c:\temp\187837.htm (1/25/2006
> 1:58:48 PM) # We have an all new forum at http://forums.mcngp.com
> strictly for discussing certification issues. Hurry on over and be the
> first to post. Don't delay, do it now.

Yeah, that's great, but only the Administrator is allowed to post.

Talk about a one-sided conversation.

Re: Certification Discussion by JaR

JaR
Wed Jan 25 14:19:14 CST 2006

Echoed forth from the dank caverns of microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, the
plaintive wail of kpg:

> Yeah, that's great, but only the Administrator is allowed to post.
>
> Talk about a one-sided conversation.

Well, that should keep it on-topic.

--
JaR
MCNGP 10110
Remove hat to reply
I can lawfully go out and get Lowdes balls cut off so that the gene pool
is cleaner and the penguins don't die. ~Lasher/Taylor

Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 14:23:57 CST 2006


"TechGeekPro" <%username%@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9756952259A2Btgp@127.0.0.1...
> We have an all new forum at http://forums.mcngp.com strictly for discussing
> certification issues. Hurry on over and be the first to post. Don't delay, do
> it now.
>
The First? You mean nobody else has posted, yet? Must not be that great of a
forum!




Re: Certification Discussion by TechGeekPro

TechGeekPro
Wed Jan 25 14:33:37 CST 2006

On Jan 25, 2006 at 3:23pm "Robert Williams" blathered:

>
> "TechGeekPro" <%username%@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9756952259A2Btgp@127.0.0.1...
>> We have an all new forum at http://forums.mcngp.com strictly for
>> discussing certification issues. Hurry on over and be the first to
>> post. Don't delay, do it now.
>>
> The First? You mean nobody else has posted, yet? Must not be that
> great of a forum!

The best, with updates.

--
TGP MCNGP #100100

mcngp.com is better than mcngp.co.uk with updates and a 99% uptime guarantee

Ya caught me! Ya caught the tater!

Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 14:36:19 CST 2006


"TechGeekPro" <%username%@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97569E49CD5E5tgp@127.0.0.1...
> On Jan 25, 2006 at 3:23pm "Robert Williams" blathered:
>
> >
> > "TechGeekPro" <%username%@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:Xns9756952259A2Btgp@127.0.0.1...
> >> We have an all new forum at http://forums.mcngp.com strictly for
> >> discussing certification issues. Hurry on over and be the first to
> >> post. Don't delay, do it now.
> >>
> > The First? You mean nobody else has posted, yet? Must not be that
> > great of a forum!
>
> The best, with updates.
>
Is that "The Best" for Mean People? Or will they accept nice people too?



Re: Certification Discussion by TechGeekPro

TechGeekPro
Wed Jan 25 14:40:25 CST 2006

On Jan 25, 2006 at 3:36pm "Robert Williams" blathered:

> Is that "The Best" for Mean People? Or will they accept nice people too?

They let me in. I really am nice. Really, dambit!!!

--
TGP MCNGP #100100

mcngp.com is better than mcngp.co.uk with updates and a 99% uptime guarantee

Spammers, please add "nospam" to address.

Re: Certification Discussion by The

The
Wed Jan 25 14:39:45 CST 2006

We accept anyone who doesn't cheat.

--
.rev.mct.mcngp.44

It is the mark of an educated man to be able to entertain a thought without
accepting it.
~Aristotle
.
"Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
wrote in message news:uNsFB8eIGHA.3144@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>
> "TechGeekPro" <%username%@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns97569E49CD5E5tgp@127.0.0.1...
>> On Jan 25, 2006 at 3:23pm "Robert Williams" blathered:
>>
>> >
>> > "TechGeekPro" <%username%@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> > news:Xns9756952259A2Btgp@127.0.0.1...
>> >> We have an all new forum at http://forums.mcngp.com strictly for
>> >> discussing certification issues. Hurry on over and be the first to
>> >> post. Don't delay, do it now.
>> >>
>> > The First? You mean nobody else has posted, yet? Must not be that
>> > great of a forum!
>>
>> The best, with updates.
>>
> Is that "The Best" for Mean People? Or will they accept nice people too?
>
>



Re: Certification Discussion by kpg

kpg
Wed Jan 25 14:48:55 CST 2006

The Rev [MCT] <ireportbadpeople@gmail.com> said something like

> We accept anyone who doesn't cheat.

On tests, right? It's just cheat on tests.
We can still cheat on other things, right?

Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 14:50:41 CST 2006

did you hear TechGeekPro <%username%@gmail.com> say in
news:Xns97569E49CD5E5tgp@127.0.0.1:

>> The First? You mean nobody else has posted, yet? Must not be that
>> great of a forum!
>
> The best, with updates.
>

it is real

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- "I find you guilty!" said the judge with conviction.

Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 14:51:17 CST 2006


"The Rev [MCT]" <ireportbadpeople@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23I3bD%23eIGHA.676@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> We accept anyone who doesn't cheat.
>
Good...can't stand them fusking cheaters.



Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 14:47:40 CST 2006


"TechGeekPro" <%username%@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97569F712B42Etgp@127.0.0.1...
> On Jan 25, 2006 at 3:36pm "Robert Williams" blathered:
>
> > Is that "The Best" for Mean People? Or will they accept nice people too?
>
> They let me in. I really am nice. Really, dambit!!!
>
> --
> TGP MCNGP #100100

I was under the impression that ALL MCNGPs were mean Jamesholes that had nothing
but sarcasm to contribute to legitimate posts by users with real problems.

If you're claiming to be nice (and I really haven't seen anything to contradict
that claim), shouldn't you be an A-MCNGP?



Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 14:51:41 CST 2006

did you hear "Robert Williams"
<RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
news:uNsFB8eIGHA.3144@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl:

> Is that "The Best" for Mean People? Or will they accept nice people too?

ever used a braindump? No? ok, you're acceptable

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- "I find you guilty!" said the judge with conviction.

Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 14:52:21 CST 2006


"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam> wrote in message
news:Xns975696AC81155ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
> The Rev [MCT] <ireportbadpeople@gmail.com> said something like
>
> > We accept anyone who doesn't cheat.
>
> On tests, right? It's just cheat on tests.
> We can still cheat on other things, right?

Anything else is totally up to your wife (or girlfriend) (or both).



Re: Certification Discussion by MitchS

MitchS
Wed Jan 25 14:55:16 CST 2006

"TechGeekPro" <%username%@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns97569F712B42Etgp@127.0.0.1...
> On Jan 25, 2006 at 3:36pm "Robert Williams" blathered:
>
>> Is that "The Best" for Mean People? Or will they accept nice people too?
>
> They let me in. I really am nice. Really, dambit!!!

Yeah, but when you're not chasing wimmin' you have your less than nice
moments. Sides, noone else wanted to build the site of all sites, so you
are prolly pretty free to behave in any manner you choose, long as you make
a backup.
--
Mitch "yer such a Jameshole" S.
MCNGP XLVIII (Now do the other certs REALLY matter?)
Get yer sorry James over to www.mcngp.com



Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 14:55:12 CST 2006


"Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9756A1597BE74neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> did you hear "Robert Williams"
> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
> news:uNsFB8eIGHA.3144@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl:
>
> > Is that "The Best" for Mean People? Or will they accept nice people too?
>
> ever used a braindump? No? ok, you're acceptable
>
I may have had a few when I was in my teens, but none of them were reusable.



Re: Certification Discussion by Briscobar

Briscobar
Wed Jan 25 14:56:15 CST 2006

Robert Williams <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
rambled:
>
> "kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam> wrote in message
> news:Xns975696AC81155ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
>> The Rev [MCT] <ireportbadpeople@gmail.com> said something like
>>
>>> We accept anyone who doesn't cheat.
>>
>> On tests, right? It's just cheat on tests.
>> We can still cheat on other things, right?
>
> Anything else is totally up to your wife (or girlfriend) (or both).


Heh. good one.

--
KB

MCNGP #26
nerd32768's mother told him to clean his room. Instead, he visited
www.mcngp.com.



Re: Certification Discussion by kpg

kpg
Wed Jan 25 14:55:03 CST 2006

> If you're claiming to be nice (and I really haven't seen anything to
> contradict that claim), shouldn't you be an A-MCNGP?

Go wash your mouth out with soap.

Then kindly do the needful.

Re: Certification Discussion by FrisbeeŽ

Frisbee®
Wed Jan 25 14:57:36 CST 2006

"Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
wrote in message news:u$PaYEfIGHA.3348@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>
> I was under the impression that ALL MCNGPs were mean Jamesholes that had
> nothing
> but sarcasm to contribute to legitimate posts by users with real problems.
>
> If you're claiming to be nice (and I really haven't seen anything to
> contradict
> that claim), shouldn't you be an A-MCNGP?

Man, I was starting to like you (no, not in -that- way), but now you've gone
and done an ultimate insult to us.



Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 14:56:58 CST 2006

did you hear "Robert Williams"
<RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
news:u$PaYEfIGHA.3348@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl:

> I was under the impression that ALL MCNGPs were mean Jamesholes that
> had nothing but sarcasm to contribute to legitimate posts by users
> with real problems.

sounds like us...but we're more complex than that

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- On the keyboard of life, always keep one finger on the escape key.

Re: Certification Discussion by TechGeekPro

TechGeekPro
Wed Jan 25 14:58:11 CST 2006

On Jan 25, 2006 at 3:47pm "Robert Williams" blathered:

> I was under the impression that ALL MCNGPs were mean Jamesholes that had
> nothing but sarcasm to contribute to legitimate posts by users with real
> problems.

I was too until I got a clue. Some of us are Jamesholes though.

> If you're claiming to be nice (and I really haven't seen anything to
> contradict that claim), shouldn't you be an A-MCNGP?

We're only mean to idiots (and each other) and the A-MCNGP are just that.

--
TGP MCNGP #100100

mcngp.com is better than mcngp.co.uk with updates and a 99% uptime guarantee

Work smarder and not harder and be careful of yor speling.

Re: Certification Discussion by TechGeekPro

TechGeekPro
Wed Jan 25 14:58:59 CST 2006

On Jan 25, 2006 at 3:55pm "MitchS" blathered:

> Yeah, but when you're not chasing wimmin' you have your less than nice
> moments. Sides, noone else wanted to build the site of all sites, so
> you are prolly pretty free to behave in any manner you choose, long as
> you make a backup.

Sure, rub it in.

--
TGP MCNGP #100100

mcngp.com is better than mcngp.co.uk with updates and a 99% uptime guarantee

How come wrong numbers are never busy?

Re: Certification Discussion by kpg

kpg
Wed Jan 25 14:58:27 CST 2006

Neil <guess!!!@gmail.com> said something like

> sounds like us...but we're more complex than that

Yeah, we have layers.

Re: Certification Discussion by kpg

kpg
Wed Jan 25 14:57:50 CST 2006

Robert Williams <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
said something like

>> ever used a braindump? No? ok, you're acceptable
>>
> I may have had a few when I was in my teens, but none of them were
> reusable.

I don't understand that comment, and furthermore, I don't want to.

Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 14:57:51 CST 2006

did you hear kpg <ipost@thereforeiam> say in
news:Xns975696AC81155ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1:

> On tests, right? It's just cheat on tests.
> We can still cheat on other things, right?

depends on if your wife catches you..

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- "Take me, I'm yours," she said easily.

Re: Certification Discussion by MitchS

MitchS
Wed Jan 25 15:02:20 CST 2006

"Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
wrote in message news:u$PaYEfIGHA.3348@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...

> If you're claiming to be nice (and I really haven't seen anything to
> contradict
> that claim), shouldn't you be an A-MCNGP?

Dood! That was mean! Why not just tell him you b@nged his mom. I'm just
apalled that someone could say that to another human being. Shame on you!

--
Mitch "yer such a Jameshole" S.
MCNGP XLVIII (Now do the other certs REALLY matter?)
Get yer sorry James over to www.mcngp.com



Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 14:58:36 CST 2006

did you hear "Robert Williams"
<RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in news:#
8Zh#EfIGHA.3408@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl:

> Anything else is totally up to your wife (or girlfriend) (or both).

DANGIT!.....read all the posts, read all the posts, read all the posts,
read all the posts....

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- "Take me, I'm yours," she said easily.

Re: Certification Discussion by MitchS

MitchS
Wed Jan 25 15:03:21 CST 2006

"Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
wrote in message news:%238Zh%23EfIGHA.3408@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>
> "kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam> wrote in message
> news:Xns975696AC81155ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
>> The Rev [MCT] <ireportbadpeople@gmail.com> said something like
>>
>> > We accept anyone who doesn't cheat.
>>
>> On tests, right? It's just cheat on tests.
>> We can still cheat on other things, right?
>
> Anything else is totally up to your wife (or girlfriend) (or both).

And the IRS. Or for Neil the GST police.

--
Mitch "yer such a Jameshole" S.
MCNGP XLVIII (Now do the other certs REALLY matter?)
Get yer sorry James over to www.mcngp.com



Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 15:02:59 CST 2006


"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam> wrote in message
news:Xns975697B732E4Cipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
> > If you're claiming to be nice (and I really haven't seen anything to
> > contradict that claim), shouldn't you be an A-MCNGP?
>
> Go wash your mouth out with soap.
>
> Then kindly do the needful.

Which soap? That hotel soap doesn't taste right and the liquid soaps make me
fart bubbles.



Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 15:03:25 CST 2006


"Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9756A23EF3BB7neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> did you hear "Robert Williams"
> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
> news:u$PaYEfIGHA.3348@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl:
>
> > I was under the impression that ALL MCNGPs were mean Jamesholes that
> > had nothing but sarcasm to contribute to legitimate posts by users
> > with real problems.
>
> sounds like us...but we're more complex than that
>
Explain



Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 15:05:21 CST 2006

did you hear kpg <ipost@thereforeiam> say in
news:Xns9756984A460B5ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1:

> Neil <guess!!!@gmail.com> said something like
>
>> sounds like us...but we're more complex than that
>
> Yeah, we have layers.
>

like an onion....

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- A man who smiles when things go wrong knows who to blame.

Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 15:06:26 CST 2006


"TechGeekPro" <%username%@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9756A2740D088tgp@127.0.0.1...
> On Jan 25, 2006 at 3:47pm "Robert Williams" blathered:
>
> > I was under the impression that ALL MCNGPs were mean Jamesholes that had
> > nothing but sarcasm to contribute to legitimate posts by users with real
> > problems.
>
> I was too until I got a clue. Some of us are Jamesholes though.
>
> > If you're claiming to be nice (and I really haven't seen anything to
> > contradict that claim), shouldn't you be an A-MCNGP?
>
> We're only mean to idiots (and each other) and the A-MCNGP are just that.
>
Makes sense, I hate idiots too...if it weren't for them, who *would* we make fun
of?



Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 15:05:20 CST 2006


"Frisbee®" <billLASTNAME@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:uDAuuGfIGHA.2036@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> "Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
> wrote in message news:u$PaYEfIGHA.3348@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> >
> > I was under the impression that ALL MCNGPs were mean Jamesholes that had
> > nothing
> > but sarcasm to contribute to legitimate posts by users with real problems.
> >
> > If you're claiming to be nice (and I really haven't seen anything to
> > contradict
> > that claim), shouldn't you be an A-MCNGP?
>
> Man, I was starting to like you (no, not in -that- way), but now you've gone
> and done an ultimate insult to us.
>
>
Awe, come on now...it's all fun --until someone loses an eye ,-)



Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 15:06:38 CST 2006

did you hear "MitchS" <firstinitlastname@nospam.gmail.com> say in
news:#Ik3LJfIGHA.2064@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:

> "Robert Williams"
> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> wrote in message
> news:u$PaYEfIGHA.3348@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>
>> If you're claiming to be nice (and I really haven't seen anything to
>> contradict
>> that claim), shouldn't you be an A-MCNGP?
>
> Dood! That was mean! Why not just tell him you b@nged his mom. I'm
> just apalled that someone could say that to another human being.
> Shame on you!
>

here, here

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- As long as there are tests, there will be prayer in public schools.

Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 15:05:45 CST 2006

did you hear kpg <ipost@thereforeiam> say in
news:Xns975697B732E4Cipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1:

>
> Then kindly do the needful.
>

down, then across

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- Intel: we put the "um..." in Pentium.

Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 15:06:10 CST 2006

did you hear TechGeekPro <%username%@gmail.com> say in
news:Xns9756A2740D088tgp@127.0.0.1:

> Some of us are Jamesholes though.

I resemble that remark

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- Intel: we put the "um..." in Pentium.

Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 15:07:12 CST 2006


"MitchS" <firstinitlastname@nospam.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23Ik3LJfIGHA.2064@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> "Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
> wrote in message news:u$PaYEfIGHA.3348@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>
> > If you're claiming to be nice (and I really haven't seen anything to
> > contradict
> > that claim), shouldn't you be an A-MCNGP?
>
> Dood! That was mean! Why not just tell him you b@nged his mom. I'm just
> apalled that someone could say that to another human being. Shame on you!
>
Alright, Alright...My humblest apologies...it won't happen again.



Re: Certification Discussion by FrisbeeŽ

Frisbee®
Wed Jan 25 15:10:47 CST 2006

"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam> wrote in message
news:Xns9756984A460B5ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
> Neil <guess!!!@gmail.com> said something like
>
>> sounds like us...but we're more complex than that
>
> Yeah, we have lawyers.

iffypiffy, and it only took the insertion of one letter.



Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 15:09:25 CST 2006

did you hear "Robert Williams"
<RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in news:
#krt6KfIGHA.740@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl:

> liquid soaps make me
> fart bubbles.
>

LOLLLERSKATES

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- A leading authority is someone lucky who guessed right.

Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 15:07:42 CST 2006

did you hear "MitchS" <firstinitlastname@nospam.gmail.com> say in
news:eDh9vJfIGHA.2036@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl:

> And the IRS. Or for Neil the GST police.

its called revenue canada. they take all of canada's revenue....

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- As long as there are tests, there will be prayer in public schools.

Re: Certification Discussion by kpg

kpg
Wed Jan 25 15:09:07 CST 2006

Robert Williams <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
said something like

> Makes sense, I hate idiots too...if it weren't for them, who *would*
> we make fun of?

Oh, there is no short list of idots.

kp "do you have a mouse in your pocket?" g


Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 15:10:21 CST 2006

did you hear "Robert Williams"
<RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
news:uOxNKLfIGHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:

> Explain

no

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- The best way to handle DOS is... wiping it off your HD!

Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 15:10:07 CST 2006

did you hear "Robert Williams"
<RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in news:#h
$gOMfIGHA.3408@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl:

> Awe, come on now...it's all fun --until someone loses an eye ,-)
>

...then it's a sport....

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- The best way to handle DOS is... wiping it off your HD!

Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 15:10:42 CST 2006

did you hear "Robert Williams"
<RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
news:utWI2MfIGHA.2212@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl:

> Makes sense, I hate idiots too...if it weren't for them, who *would*
> we make fun of?
>

that would be me

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- You're schizophrenic? Gee, that makes four of us!

Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 15:16:56 CST 2006


"Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9756A2862C5E7neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> did you hear "Robert Williams"
> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in news:#
> 8Zh#EfIGHA.3408@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl:
>
> > Anything else is totally up to your wife (or girlfriend) (or both).
>
> DANGIT!.....read all the posts, read all the posts, read all the posts,
> read all the posts....
>
I'm tryin, I'm tryin, I'm tryin



Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 15:21:50 CST 2006


"Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9756A479B5E92neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> did you hear "Robert Williams"
> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in news:#h
> $gOMfIGHA.3408@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl:
>
> > Awe, come on now...it's all fun --until someone loses an eye ,-)
> >
>
> ...then it's a sport....
>
...or a police beating



Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 15:21:07 CST 2006


"Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9756A483E4A7Aneilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> did you hear "Robert Williams"
> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
> news:uOxNKLfIGHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
>
> > Explain
>
> no
>
please?



Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 15:22:27 CST 2006


"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam> wrote in message
news:Xns97569A195394Cipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
> Robert Williams <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
> said something like
>
> > Makes sense, I hate idiots too...if it weren't for them, who *would*
> > we make fun of?
>
> Oh, there is no short list of idots.
>
precisely



Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 15:22:54 CST 2006


"Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9756A493170A2neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> did you hear "Robert Williams"
> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
> news:utWI2MfIGHA.2212@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl:
>
> > Makes sense, I hate idiots too...if it weren't for them, who *would*
> > we make fun of?
> >
>
> that would be me
>
as long as you're volunteering.....



Re: Certification Discussion by CBIC

CBIC
Wed Jan 25 15:23:15 CST 2006

if it weren't for them, who *would*
> we make fun of?

*sigh*
usually me
--
aka
Doom MCNGP #38
Is that a burdizzo in your pocket or are you just glad to see me.
PotD 1-20-06



Re: Certification Discussion by MitchS

MitchS
Wed Jan 25 15:26:29 CST 2006

"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam> wrote in message
news:Xns9756984A460B5ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
> Yeah, we have layers.

Whew! That was close, I read it as lawyers.

--
Mitch "yer such a Jameshole" S.
MCNGP XLVIII (Now do the other certs REALLY matter?)
Get yer sorry James over to www.mcngp.com



Re: Certification Discussion by CBIC

CBIC
Wed Jan 25 15:23:52 CST 2006

In news:Xns9756A493170A2neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16,
Neil <guess!!!@gmail.com> embarrassed himself by saying:
> did you hear "Robert Williams"
> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
> news:utWI2MfIGHA.2212@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl:
>
>> Makes sense, I hate idiots too...if it weren't for them, who *would*
>> we make fun of?
>>
>
> that would be me

Darn
IDRATP (I didn't read all the posts)
--
aka
Doom MCNGP #38
Is that a burdizzo in your pocket or are you just glad to see me.
PotD 1-20-06



Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 15:25:46 CST 2006


"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam> wrote in message
news:Xns9756982FE6810ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
> Robert Williams <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
> said something like
>
> >> ever used a braindump? No? ok, you're acceptable
> >>
> > I may have had a few when I was in my teens, but none of them were
> > reusable.
>
> I don't understand that comment, and furthermore, I don't want to.

That was my goal.....he shoots....he scores....



Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 15:25:04 CST 2006

did you hear "Robert Williams"
<RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in news:
#kN2cVfIGHA.216@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl:

>
> "Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9756A479B5E92neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
>> did you hear "Robert Williams"
>> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in news:#h
>> $gOMfIGHA.3408@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl:
>>
>> > Awe, come on now...it's all fun --until someone loses an eye ,-)
>> >
>>
>> ...then it's a sport....
>>
> ...or a police beating
>
>
>

or entertaining

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- Spell chequers dew knot work write.

Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 15:26:04 CST 2006

did you hear "Robert Williams"
<RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in news:
#z0NtSfIGHA.1388@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl:

>
> "Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9756A2862C5E7neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
>> did you hear "Robert Williams"
>> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in news:#
>> 8Zh#EfIGHA.3408@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl:
>>
>> > Anything else is totally up to your wife (or girlfriend) (or both).
>>
>> DANGIT!.....read all the posts, read all the posts, read all the
posts,
>> read all the posts....
>>
> I'm tryin, I'm tryin, I'm tryin
>
>
>

you are trying (very trying) but I meant me, not you.

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- If you think nobody cares if you're alive, try missing a couple of car
payments.

Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 15:25:34 CST 2006

did you hear "Robert Williams"
<RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
news:edqNDVfIGHA.2896@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:

>
> "Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9756A483E4A7Aneilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
>> did you hear "Robert Williams"
>> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
>> news:uOxNKLfIGHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
>>
>> > Explain
>>
>> no
>>
> please?
>
>
>

nope, you can learn from bad experience, just like the rest of us.

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- Spell chequers dew knot work write.

Re: Certification Discussion by LRM

LRM
Wed Jan 25 15:25:16 CST 2006

"Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
wrote in message news:edqNDVfIGHA.2896@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>
> "Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9756A483E4A7Aneilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
>> did you hear "Robert Williams"
>> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
>> news:uOxNKLfIGHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
>>
>> > Explain
>>
>> no
>>
> please?
>
>
Hmmm, I like a man that can beg.

--
LRM
MCNGP 7^2



Re: Certification Discussion by MitchS

MitchS
Wed Jan 25 15:30:43 CST 2006

"Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
wrote in message news:edqNDVfIGHA.2896@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>
> "Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:Xns9756A483E4A7Aneilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
>> did you hear "Robert Williams"
>> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
>> news:uOxNKLfIGHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
>>
>> > Explain
>>
>> no
>>
> please?

The complexity that is us is inexplainable.

--
Mitch "yer such a Jameshole" S.
MCNGP XLVIII (Now do the other certs REALLY matter?)
Get yer sorry James over to www.mcngp.com



Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 15:30:44 CST 2006


"LRM" <Fskspam@friedspam.com> wrote in message
news:OK3bXXfIGHA.312@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> "Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
> wrote in message news:edqNDVfIGHA.2896@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> >
> > "Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:Xns9756A483E4A7Aneilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> >> did you hear "Robert Williams"
> >> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
> >> news:uOxNKLfIGHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
> >>
> >> > Explain
> >>
> >> no
> >>
> > please?
> >
> >
> Hmmm, I like a man that can beg.
>
If p*ssy is involved, I can beg all day



Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 15:30:02 CST 2006


"Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9756A72E4E421neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> did you hear "Robert Williams"
> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in news:
> #z0NtSfIGHA.1388@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl:
>
> >
> > "Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:Xns9756A2862C5E7neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> >> did you hear "Robert Williams"
> >> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in news:#
> >> 8Zh#EfIGHA.3408@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl:
> >>
> >> > Anything else is totally up to your wife (or girlfriend) (or both).
> >>
> >> DANGIT!.....read all the posts, read all the posts, read all the
> posts,
> >> read all the posts....
> >>
> > I'm tryin, I'm tryin, I'm tryin
> >
> >
> >
>
> you are trying (very trying) but I meant me, not you.
>
That's just me



Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 15:31:01 CST 2006


"Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9756A7184B6FEneilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> did you hear "Robert Williams"
> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
> news:edqNDVfIGHA.2896@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>
> >
> > "Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:Xns9756A483E4A7Aneilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> >> did you hear "Robert Williams"
> >> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
> >> news:uOxNKLfIGHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
> >>
> >> > Explain
> >>
> >> no
> >>
> > please?
> >
> >
> >
>
> nope, you can learn from bad experience, just like the rest of us.
>
Been there all too often



Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 15:32:20 CST 2006

did you hear "LRM" <Fskspam@friedspam.com> say in news:OK3bXXfIGHA.312
@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:

> Hmmm, I like a man that can beg.

yeah well, no more I say...


no please, no more....please.....


ORANGE!!!

--
The Inter"you promised safe, sane and consentual"Neil MCNGP#30

- She criticized my house, so I knocked her flat.

Re: Certification Discussion by MitchS

MitchS
Wed Jan 25 15:35:08 CST 2006

"CBIC" <spam.thisbiotch@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:u$jklWfIGHA.3728@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> In news:Xns9756A493170A2neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16,
> Neil <guess!!!@gmail.com> embarrassed himself by saying:
>> did you hear "Robert Williams"
>> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
>> news:utWI2MfIGHA.2212@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl:
>>
>>> Makes sense, I hate idiots too...if it weren't for them, who *would*
>>> we make fun of?
>>>
>>
>> that would be me
>
> Darn
> IDRATP (I didn't read all the posts)

Who can keep up!?!?!

--
Mitch "yer such a Jameshole" S.
MCNGP XLVIII (Now do the other certs REALLY matter?)
Get yer sorry James over to www.mcngp.com



Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 15:32:06 CST 2006


"MitchS" <firstinitlastname@nospam.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:u548CZfIGHA.3176@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> "Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
> wrote in message news:edqNDVfIGHA.2896@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> >
> > "Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:Xns9756A483E4A7Aneilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> >> did you hear "Robert Williams"
> >> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
> >> news:uOxNKLfIGHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
> >>
> >> > Explain
> >>
> >> no
> >>
> > please?
>
> The complexity that is us is inexplainable.
>
That explains it



Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 15:33:08 CST 2006

did you hear "CBIC" <spam.thisbiotch@gmail.com> say in news:u
$jklWfIGHA.3728@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl:

> IDRATP (I didn't read all the posts)

YAFA

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- day++; dollar++;

Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 15:33:28 CST 2006

did you hear "Robert Williams"
<RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
news:eI0DDWfIGHA.648@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl:

> as long as you're volunteering.....

I was volunteered

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- day++; dollar++;

Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 15:33:56 CST 2006

did you hear "Robert Williams"
<RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
news:OR1apXfIGHA.1180@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:

> That was my goal.....he shoots....he scores....

I believe you have those out of order

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- Do trailer parks cause tornados?

Re: Certification Discussion by LRM

LRM
Wed Jan 25 15:36:28 CST 2006

"Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
wrote in message news:ODPxaafIGHA.3144@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>
> "LRM" <Fskspam@friedspam.com> wrote in message
> news:OK3bXXfIGHA.312@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> "Robert Williams" <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
>> wrote in message news:edqNDVfIGHA.2896@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> >
>> > "Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> > news:Xns9756A483E4A7Aneilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
>> >> did you hear "Robert Williams"
>> >> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
>> >> news:uOxNKLfIGHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
>> >>
>> >> > Explain
>> >>
>> >> no
>> >>
>> > please?
>> >
>> >
>> Hmmm, I like a man that can beg.
>>
> If p*ssy is involved, I can beg all day
>
>
Great! I'll get the suspension hooks, kgp was too chicken. If you're still
alive at the end we can have a conversation about your overall disposition.
Of course it doesn't bother me as I will apply a gag ball, ask the other
guys about that.

--
LRM
MCNGP 7^2



Re: Certification Discussion by kpg

kpg
Wed Jan 25 15:36:39 CST 2006

MitchS <firstinitlastname@nospam.gmail.com> said something like

> # Name resolution details: file://c:\temp\187963.htm (1/25/2006
> 3:34:38 PM) # "kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam> wrote in message
> news:Xns9756984A460B5ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
>> Yeah, we have layers.
>
> Whew! That was close, I read it as lawyers.

Speaking of which, I may be in need to the MCNGP legal team.


I assume my membership dues entitle me to full legal services?


Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 15:37:21 CST 2006

did you hear "Robert Williams"
<RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
news:eKZqLbfIGHA.3984@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl:

>
> "MitchS" <firstinitlastname@nospam.gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:u548CZfIGHA.3176@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
>> "Robert Williams"
<RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
>> wrote in message news:edqNDVfIGHA.2896@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> >
>> > "Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
>> > news:Xns9756A483E4A7Aneilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
>> >> did you hear "Robert Williams"
>> >> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
>> >> news:uOxNKLfIGHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
>> >>
>> >> > Explain
>> >>
>> >> no
>> >>
>> > please?
>>
>> The complexity that is us is inexplainable.
>>
> That explains it
>
>
>

no, it's more complex than that...

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- I am Ross Perot of Borg. You will be assimilated. Nah, never mind. Then
again...

Re: Certification Discussion by MitchS

MitchS
Wed Jan 25 15:41:05 CST 2006

"LRM" <Fskspam@friedspam.com> wrote in message
news:%23O1PodfIGHA.3752@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...

> gag ball

Um, that's ball gag RTFC.

--
Mitch "yer such a Jameshole" S.
MCNGP XLVIII (Now do the other certs REALLY matter?)
Get yer sorry James over to www.mcngp.com



Re: Certification Discussion by kpg

kpg
Wed Jan 25 15:37:38 CST 2006

MitchS <firstinitlastname@nospam.gmail.com> said something like

> The complexity that is us is inexplainable.

So is that sentence.

Re: Certification Discussion by FrisbeeŽ

Frisbee®
Wed Jan 25 15:39:14 CST 2006

"MitchS" <firstinitlastname@nospam.gmail.com> wrote in message
news:eQKXrWfIGHA.1876@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> "kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam> wrote in message
> news:Xns9756984A460B5ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
>> Yeah, we have layers.
>
> Whew! That was close, I read it as lawyers.

Does anyone read -my- poasts anymore?



Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 15:39:45 CST 2006

did you hear kpg <ipost@thereforeiam> say in
news:Xns97569EC4C29FFipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1:

> I assume my membership dues entitle me to full legal services?

he was last seen driving the ferrari (this should bring on a few from JaR
that I can reply to)

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- Got a new car for my wife... great trade!

Re: Certification Discussion by Neil

Neil
Wed Jan 25 15:38:53 CST 2006

did you hear "LRM" <Fskspam@friedspam.com> say in
news:#O1PodfIGHA.3752@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl:

> Great! I'll get the suspension hooks, kgp was too chicken. If you're
> still alive at the end we can have a conversation about your overall
> disposition. Of course it doesn't bother me as I will apply a gag
> ball, ask the other guys about that.
>

then you'll force feed him a small cat, wont you...

--
The InterNeil MCNGP#30

- Got a new car for my wife... great trade!

Re: Certification Discussion by MitchS

MitchS
Wed Jan 25 15:42:57 CST 2006

"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam> wrote in message
news:Xns97569EC4C29FFipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
> Speaking of which, I may be in need to the MCNGP legal team.
>
>
> I assume my membership dues entitle me to full legal services?

I hope it's nothing serious, we can't even get the Ferrari, the pliers, or
an answer from Mr. T. C. Tips. Some legal team!

--
Mitch "yer such a Jameshole" S.
MCNGP XLVIII (Now do the other certs REALLY matter?)
Get yer sorry James over to www.mcngp.com



Re: Certification Discussion by kpg

kpg
Wed Jan 25 15:41:25 CST 2006

Frisbee® <billLASTNAME@yahoo.com> said something like

> # Name resolution details: file://c:\temp\187999.htm (1/25/2006
> 3:40:44 PM) # "MitchS" <firstinitlastname@nospam.gmail.com> wrote in
> message news:eQKXrWfIGHA.1876@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>> "kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9756984A460B5ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
>>> Yeah, we have layers.
>>
>> Whew! That was close, I read it as lawyers.
>
> Does anyone read -my- poasts anymore?

Neil soaks up all the readership.

Re: Certification Discussion by MitchS

MitchS
Wed Jan 25 15:44:22 CST 2006

"Frisbee®" <billLASTNAME@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:%23Q70$dfIGHA.3460@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> "MitchS" <firstinitlastname@nospam.gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eQKXrWfIGHA.1876@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
>> "kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9756984A460B5ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
>>> Yeah, we have layers.
>>
>> Whew! That was close, I read it as lawyers.
>
> Does anyone read -my- poasts anymore?

I do, and I did... it just happened to be after I hit send. Lag time you
know. Brilliant thought though.

--
Mitch "yer such a Jameshole" S.
MCNGP XLVIII (Now do the other certs REALLY matter?)
Get yer sorry James over to www.mcngp.com



Re: Certification Discussion by kpg

kpg
Wed Jan 25 15:44:01 CST 2006

MitchS <firstinitlastname@nospam.gmail.com> said something like

>> gag ball
>
> Um, that's ball gag RTFC.

Wouldn't it depend on how it was applied?

Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 15:45:43 CST 2006


"Frisbee®" <billLASTNAME@yahoo.com> wrote in message
news:%23Q70$dfIGHA.3460@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> "MitchS" <firstinitlastname@nospam.gmail.com> wrote in message
> news:eQKXrWfIGHA.1876@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> > "kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam> wrote in message
> > news:Xns9756984A460B5ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
> >> Yeah, we have layers.
> >
> > Whew! That was close, I read it as lawyers.
>
> Does anyone read -my- poasts anymore?
>
>
Who are you? This is the first one I've seen from you.



Re: Certification Discussion by FrisbeeŽ

Frisbee®
Wed Jan 25 15:48:50 CST 2006

"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam> wrote in message
news:Xns97569EC4C29FFipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
> MitchS <firstinitlastname@nospam.gmail.com> said something like
>
>> # Name resolution details: file://c:\temp\187963.htm (1/25/2006
>> 3:34:38 PM) # "kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam> wrote in message
>> news:Xns9756984A460B5ipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
>>> Yeah, we have layers.
>>
>> Whew! That was close, I read it as lawyers.
>
> Speaking of which, I may be in need to the MCNGP legal team.
>
>
> I assume my membership dues entitle me to full legal services?

No problem, but you have to find Diana first.



Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 15:48:12 CST 2006


"Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9756A86FB94DAneilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> did you hear "Robert Williams"
> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
> news:eI0DDWfIGHA.648@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl:
>
> > as long as you're volunteering.....
>
> I was volunteered
>
Are you sure about that?



Re: Certification Discussion by Robert

Robert
Wed Jan 25 15:47:41 CST 2006


"Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:Xns9756A9181BF60neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> did you hear "Robert Williams"
> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
> news:eKZqLbfIGHA.3984@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl:
>
> >
> > "MitchS" <firstinitlastname@nospam.gmail.com> wrote in message
> > news:u548CZfIGHA.3176@TK2MSFTNGP12.phx.gbl...
> >> "Robert Williams"
> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com>
> >> wrote in message news:edqNDVfIGHA.2896@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> >> >
> >> > "Neil" <guess!!!@gmail.com> wrote in message
> >> > news:Xns9756A483E4A7Aneilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16...
> >> >> did you hear "Robert Williams"
> >> >> <RobertW@I.DONT.WANT.YOUR.SPAM.danjonengineering.com> say in
> >> >> news:uOxNKLfIGHA.1124@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl:
> >> >>
> >> >> > Explain
> >> >>
> >> >> no
> >> >>
> >> > please?
> >>
> >> The complexity that is us is inexplainable.
> >>
> > That explains it
> >
> >
> >
>
> no, it's more complex than that...
>
even MORE than THAT? Wow, I'm in trouble!



Re: Certification Discussion by MitchS

MitchS
Wed Jan 25 15:50:48 CST 2006

"kpg" <ipost@thereforeiam> wrote in message
news:Xns9756A0043378Bipostthereforeiam@127.0.0.1...
> MitchS <firstinitlastname@nospam.gmail.com> said something like
>
>>> gag ball
>>
>> Um, that's ball gag RTFC.
>
> Wouldn't it depend on how it was applied?

Gag ball, hmm... a humorous prosthetic device. I see your point. But if it
were being purchased due to sissy girl testicular cancer it wouldn't be
humorous.

--
Mitch "yer such a Jameshole" S.
MCNGP XLVIII (Now do the other certs REALLY matter?)
Get yer sorry James over to www.mcngp.com