What should a MCSA Do now ?
Hay all,
I have successfully completed my MCSA 2003 last year and I think I am
a little far from the field.
Could any systems administrator offer an advice for a colleague I
already started my preparation for 70-293 exam to complete MCSE I
think I will be ready at the end of the month there will be two exams
left.
I just need to know what I should do next.
I have a vision to try CCNA, or maybe another idea is highly
appreciated. Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 214152
Full and Part-time Trainers Needed
Netdesk Corporation, The premier Microsoft Gold Certified Learning Partner
in the Northwest is looking to expand our technical training staff.
If you are a hot-shot with Windows Server 2003, Server Products and
Technologies (Exchange, SharePoint, ISA, Security, ...), .NET Development
(C# or VB.NET), or SQL Server Technologies (SQL 2000 and 2005, Reporting
Services, Business Intelligence) or CISCO we have an opportunity for you.
Netdesk focuses on middle tier to enterprise customers in the Northwest
West, our students aren't cooks trying to learn how to program or run a
network. Our students are working professionals looking to advance their
skills and successfully complete projects.
If you thrive on the newest Microsoft technologies and love to learn and
share what you know - this is the place to be. We have great team of
professional who work together to offer the very best Microsoft Technical
training in the Northwest.
We currently have openings for:
. .NET Developers with C# and VB.NET skills
. SQL Database (2000/2005) Developers with Notification Services,
Reporting Services and TSQL experience
. SQL Administrators (2000/2005)
. Windows Server 2003 Administrators
Qualifications:
. Work experience with the relevant technology.
. An excitement about Microsoft technology.
. A love for learning and sharing.
. A dynamic and interesting personality.
. Ability to work as part of a close knit team.
. Must be located in the Northwest (no relocation expenses
provided).
. Willing to accept a full time or contacted part time position (10
days per month for part time position).
. Current or previous Microsoft certification preferred:
* (MCT, MCSE, MCSD, MCDBA or MCP)
* New certification for .NET and Database technologies
* Specialization
* Professional
* Architect
Benefits:
. Netdesk offers excellent compensation, quarterly bonuses, a 401K
and paid Dental/Vision/Medical insurance for the employee.
. Four weeks paid vacation.
. We pay for all exams and certifications
. Opportunity for you and your family members to attend classes
There is no better place in the Northwest to build on and develop your
skills, if you are an experienced professional and have ever considered
teaching contact me and explore the possibilities at resumes@netdesk.com .
Jeff Roach - Netdesk
Director of Instructors Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 214146
Windows Server 2003 Eval CD
Hello,
I installed this a few months ago and was wondering if anyone knows where in
the os I can look to see how many days I have left before the 180 days
expires?
Thanks
-G Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 214117
Help please
Guys
I've been given the chance to complete my MCSE and I'm unsure if this is
still possible
I started my MCSE2000 and have 70-210/215/216/217/218/227
Looking at Microsoft.com/MCP it does not appear that the MCSE2000 Roadtrack
has been killed off
Can I complete my MCSE 2000 by taking and sitting 1 more elective
or
Do I have to forgo all these quals now and resit the MCSE2003 track
TIA Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 214113
First Time Test Takers....
If you've never taken a Microsoft exam you can save 40% on your first when
you test with VUE
Use Discount code: MSU62D585652 and take 40% off after that you can still
take 20% off each additional exam with discount code: SUU7C1E9359
--
.rev
"It is the mark of an educated man to be able to entertain a thought without
accepting it"
~Aristotle
. Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 214108
Where to begin?
Where does one begin who is not going to school to learn about Windows
Server 2003.
I have a spare box at home with an copy of Windows Server 2003 Ent. and Std.
with licenses for both through my school's program with Microsoft.
I've installed Server 2003, now what?
Should I have a switch and several other computers setup?
I would like to gain experience with configuring, troubleshooting,
installing, properly setting up an actual server that runs Server 2003.
Thanks in advance. Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 214089
70-296 Upgrade Exam
I would like to know if you can retake the 70 -296 exam should you fail it.
Regards,
GDustrider Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 214068
OT: For those of you who want a good laff
The guy who has a "thing" for Certguard double-posted his 22k diatribe over
in alt.certification.mcse. I think the guy's a few fries short of a Happy
Meal, myself. Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 214065
Become MCSE!!!!
Excellent MCSE helping material , with FAQ and trouble shooting at
http://it-techexperts.com/MCSE/MCSE.asp
DON'T MISS!!! Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 214057
Part IV of the Series I'm writing
This is what it's all about! Our final installment of "The cheating industry
that is devaluing IT certification". This one is all about the Gunmen.
We're hoping to provide you with more in the future.
Enjoy the reading, comments are encouraged.
http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/14695
Previous Installments
Part 1: http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/13341
Part 2: http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/13646
Part 3: http://www.networkworld.com/community/?q=node/14403
--
CertGuard
You think you know IT?!?!
CertGear: http://www.cafepress.com/certguard Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 214053
CertGuard - Info?
Hi IT Community,
I decided to do some research on this so called www.certguard.com. I
see post over post about these braindumps. Well, let me tell you
something, I have done some extensive research on this CertGuard
company and I warn everybody to make a decision for themselves on this
company. CertGuard claims to watch for companies that state you will
pass on your first try, any company that offers 100% Pass Guarantee
and not a 100% Money Back Guarantee, what is the difference? There is
no difference. What seems to be really funny is that my best friend
ordered off transcender.com the so called (Reader's Choice Award) and
found their questions to be identical to the real exam. So, where does
CertGuard go off stating that www.transcender.com and other sites
listed on there website are clean when in fact they are not. Every
single vendor out there put's real if not very very similar exam
questions related to the real exam. You can view the list of the so
called CertGuard's clean list below:
http://www.certguard.com/reviews.asp
Now, you see many companies listed here: "Wonder if these companies
are paying for this?"
Now, let's look at www.transcender.com the so called (Reader's Choice
Award) winner. Which many many people have stated that in fact they do
provide the exact questions on there products.
According to Certguard.com, CertGuard states to stay away from the
below websites that state the below:
i. Every website that is owned by TestKing provides braindumps. Yes,
it's that obvious! If just ONE of TestKing's websites provides
braindumps, ALL of them do.
ii. Sites that advertise 'Actual Exam Questions & Answers' are most
likely passing off braindumps.
iii. Sites that offer a '100% Pass Guarantee on the FIRST try' (most
legitimate sites will offer a Money Back Guarantee, but this is
completely different than guaranteeing you a passing score.) Make sure
you read their Disclaimer before you jump into any commitments. OR
ASK
US!!!!
iv. Access to ALL of their practice exams for X number of dollars is
another sign of a braindump, no legitimate corporation can afford to
just give away their material for next to nothing. We've seen
legitimate practice exam run for as little as $40 or as much as $300
per exam, but we've never seen a legitimate site offer ALL of their
Exams in a bundle for such a cheap price.
v. Legitimate Practice Exams will generally cost around $100 per CD
(or Exam), unless the Test Prep provider is offering a discount, but
even then the kits are no less than $50 per CD. If you're looking at
buying a bundle of exams for that price, then you're almost sure to
be
purchasing braindumps.
vi. PDFs!! Not every PDF is a braindump, and not every braindump is a
PDF, but the odds of getting a PDF that isn't a braindump is pretty
rare. DON'T TRUST PDFs!!!
Well, looking at www.transcender.com, I found the below:
Furthermore, you can view more about there guarantee below:
http://www.transcender.com/guarantee/
They will refund your purchase the first time if you fail. Now this is
just one of the sites I picked on CertGuard's so called clean list.
Click also the link below:
http://www.transcender.com/dept.aspx?dept%5Fid=100000
You will see an image with a guy jumping with his leg's open, Read
what it states:
You will Pass the First Time Guarantee. End Of Discussion. (This is
the exact wording used on jrksoftware.com, another well known
braindump provider)
Proof backing up my claim on transcender. Please click the below posts
in newsgroups made by people ordering from transcender.
http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcad/browse_thread/thread/4740b2d9d62ca55c/a282ee8503baa62f?lnk=st&q=transcender+real+questions&rnum=3&hl=en#a282ee8503baa62f
Below is also another post from David Mickelson stating that Microsoft
does not support transcender.
http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd/browse_thread/thread/84123cf7f578717f/4fa05c8d04b0b552?lnk=st&q=transcender+real+questions&rnum=5&hl=en#4fa05c8d04b0b552
The link below is another post you can view on transcender's from the
user Coffee.
http://groups.google.ca/group/alt.certification.mcse/browse_thread/thread/fc929f997a2cbc7b/07825e55337c8266?lnk=st&q=transcender+real+questions&rnum=6&hl=en#07825e55337c8266
I can add more and more posts on this subject regarding Transcender
but I will stop here, you can do this research yourself, but I warn
you, watch for transcender staff trying to convince you otherwise on
the newsgroups.
To make a long story short, no one really knows if CertGuard is
getting paid off, only they know. It is so funny on how they defend
websites that they state are clean when people who have actually
ordered from those sites state otherwise.
My opinions are expressed below on the whole topic of braindumps and
CertGuard: Please feel free to comment on this.
1. Braindumps don't hurt the IT industry. The Hiring Managers
Incompetence is what is Hurting the IT industry. What's hurting the IT
industry are incompetent hiring managers. When hiring IT staff, it is
up to the employer to determine the applicant has the necessary IT
skills and knowledge to perform in their job to back up their
certification, and not just assume they do simply because they are
certified. People who use braindumps and just plain memorize questions
are easily detected by any competent hiring manager during the first
interview.
For example, if we were to compare 2 candidates with a CCNA
certification being interviewed for the same job, and lets say one
studied via CCNA instructor led classes and books, and the other
simply braindumps. During the first interview, the hiring manager
would surely ask the candidates some technical questions based on
their CCNA assumed knowledge and skills like describe the OSI layers
and their functions or something like this. The candidate that only
memorized the braindumps to pass the exam would not know how to reply
where as the candidate who studied hard would easily be able to answer
the question.
I know when I was interviewed for my job, I was tested on configuring
a Cisco router with NAT, also doing an IOS upgrade on a router, and
configuring MPLS on the router. I passed but the manager took extra
steps to ensure that I did indeed know what I was talking about. So,
what I am saying is to educate managers and companies to test there
employee's instead of just assuming that they are good.
2. CertGuard looks to me to support braindump sites, and possibly has
a financial interest in their supposed clean list of sites it
supports. CertGaurd clearly offers only biased information so take
everything you read from any of them carefully, in fact, I would not
trust them at all!
Reasons they are exploiting the IT industry is because they clearly
state certain sites are clean when any newbie to this industry can
tell they are not, and also because they are profiting from selling
advertising space on their website all in the name of their bogus war
on IT Braindumps and cheaters.
How do we know if any of them are actually certified? How did they get
their certifications? Maybe they bought them from testking? How can we
trust a group of online posters who seem to use Nazi-Like rhetoric and
Communist type phrases? Don't take my word for it, just check any of
their posts and you will surely see this to be the case.
Clearly, by simple investigation anyone can see that many of the sites
Certguard supports are Braindumps ie. QuickCert.com, Trancender.com,
Certways.com, jrksoftware.com etc...
Could it be possible that Certguard is receiving some form of
financial compensation for their support of these known braindump
providers? I would have to say yes since their War on Braindumps etc..
is simply an exploit of this issue for financial gain as they are
selling advertising on their website.
As we all know, if something sounds too good to be true, it usually
is. This has been my experience specifically with Certguard. At first
glance, I thought, finally, someone who will actually do something to
clean up the IT industry, but after really looking into their website,
it seems 100% clear that they have a financial interest in this so
called War on Braindumps. I would like to suggest that Robert Williams
rename this war to "My War Against Braindump Sites I Am Not Profiting
From!" because clearly as you will see below, many of the sites listed
on his bogus clean list are actually well know braindumps sites which
are probably paying him:
- QuickCert.com - They Claim this site is clean:
http://www.certguard.com/forums/topic.asp?TID=450
Clearly, this site is not clean because they have a direct link from
certifyexpress.com, braindumpcentral.com, braindumps.com, which
Certguard knows is a Testking owned website and a well known braindump
promoting site as you will see below:
On the homepage of certifyexpress.com, you will notice the very top
banner advertising for Testking.com, then the one just below it
advertising for Quickcert.com, and then there are 3 links for Actual-
Exams.com, Testking.com and you guessed it, Quickcert.com. Clearly,
you cannot dispute this evidence and clearly, certguard must have some
financial interest in promoting quickcert.com.
Here is another list from a CertGuard post which lists Braindump free
sites: http://www.certguard.com/forums/topic.asp?TID=270 out of this
list, there are clearly well KNOWN braindump sites like:
Certways.com - a well known braindump site most likely owned by
Testking with hosting on the same server as:
- Examways.com
- Examworx.com
jrksoftware.com - a longtime braindump provider using the EasyCert
name their homepage clearly states "you will pass the first time
guaranteed! In the left menu bar with a pic of a girl jumping for joy.
A simple backlink check will show that they have an incoming link from
Examblasters.com, which is also another braindump site:
http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://www.jrksoftware.com/&hl=en&start=10&sa=N
gocertify.com - they claim to be clean, however they have a link on
their site for Practice Tests with goes to goexam.com which seems to
be their cover to sell braindumps with a Pass Guarantee and 25% - 50%
off their products.
Transcender.com - They provide a Pass on Your First Try Guarantee and
practice tests that contain actual exam questions. I know this
firsthand as my best friend used their material about 1 year ago and
found this to be the case. Surely not clean and also seems to have an
affiliate as listed next.
studyexam4less.com/transcender.asp - They also provide braindumps and
are well known to be doing this for some time now. They even have
their own page outlining the 100% Pass Guarantee here:
studyexam4less.com/Transcender-Pass-the-exam-the-first-time-
Guarantee.asp
certsavvy.com - offers a Pass the First Time Guarantee and is known to
provide real exam questions
3. CertGuard is Childish, Immoral and Useless.
They seem to always provide Useless info and no help for newcomers to
the IT industry and often end up insulting and or threatening your
legitimate beginner questions. CertGuard doesn't seem like a group of
people I would trust with my career choices so be very careful and
think for yourself.
Here is a perfect example of what I am talking about:
Post Topic: What requirement for MCSE
The First Guy posts about the requirements for MCSE but no one other
than Birol gives a useful reply. Cerebrus (who works for certguard)
and Certguard both give useless, insulting replies and also show just
how childish and immoral they are, so how could any one trust what
such rude and immoral people say, without doing their own research:
http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/898b840717f20934/61957239a6843f67?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=106&hl=en#61957239a6843f67
I would never ever trust my career choices with anything these animals
say. They are basically wolves in sheeps clothing, trying to make a
buck all while not helping and rudely poking fun at anyone that comes
into their path!
And if you think I am making this up, just check any of their posts
and you will surely see their wolf like attitude speak out loud:
This is in addition to what Larry J West has stated about certguard
for which I agree 100%:
http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcdst/browse_thread/thread/b913082dda4522e6/a6dd48bde6adf5f1?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=76&hl=en#a6dd48bde6adf5f1
Larry States:
"You are right that many in the MCNGP / CertGuard group are very
childish, rude beyond belief, and in most cases [90% of the time] not
very helpful. Their insulting of people for no reason who are trying
to help people is truly beyond my comprehension, especially since
these are people who are supposedly knowledgeable enough on computers
to know that UseNet exists (Not everyone does) and hence have some
intelligence.
So why did you join them? I think their group's goals of stamping out
proxy-testers and braindumps is very laudable, but their actions are
just like the outgoing Clinton officials
glueing of the "W" keys on government computers - it doesn't show any
intelligence, it just shows how childish they are and destroys what
credibility they did have. This is a PUBLIC forum - their actions may
be fine in their fraternity houses on their college campuses, but not
in the real world. Their response to you in not acknowledging that
this is a problem (but just criticizing you further) is another sign
that they are ignorant and do not understand or care. Until they
change, I will not be joining that group, which is a shame, since I
too agree with cleaning up the certification mess."
Even the criticism of you putting your "MCP" in your signature is a
sign that some in the group's leadership deep down don't care about
increasing the values of all certifications. They just want to justify
their psychological need of putting people down and somehow believe
that this is a good method of doing so.
I would like to know why you gave them credibility for their actions
by joining their group.
4. CertGuard Is not to be Trusted?
Just read any of their posts and replies and you will certainly agree
that they are offensive, rude, not willing to help and in the end,
fraudulent as they claim to provide support for clean sites when they
actually support braindump type sites.
5. CertGuard should issue a War on Incompetent Managers. But there is
no financial gain in doing that! It is 100% up to the hiring manager
to weed out unqualified applicants, in reality, no one cares about
braindumps. Because there is no financial gain in this reality,
certguard will never come to grips with this and seems to continue to
pursue their fake war on cheaters!
These are just my opinions made by facts and observations that I have
seen and listed with regards to Certguard.com. You make you own
decision?
I have listed posts below that you can view and see for yourself on
this so called CertGuard company:
1. Many arguments that CertGuard may be covering and providing
braindumps:
http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/5d98421a377bcb3b/9a3a6262b88ed1b1?lnk=st&q=certguard&rnum=2&hl=en#9a3a6262b88ed1b1
2. Exams Required for MCSE -> LarryWestMCSD (5th post down) states
that CertGuard is childish, rude and most of all not helpful. This is
exactly what we want to say about them in addition to their support of
apparent braindump sites and exploiting this War on Braindumps for a
profit via website advertising. Below is a quote taken from this post.
http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcdst/browse_thread/thread/b913082dda4522e6/a6dd48bde6adf5f1?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=76&hl=en#a6dd48bde6adf5f1
"You are right that many in the MCNGP / CertGuard group are very
childish, rude beyond belief, and in most cases [90% of the time] not
very helpful.
Their insulting of people for no reason who are trying to help people
is truly beyond my comprehension, especially since these are people
who are supposedly knowledgeable enough on computers to know that
UseNet exists (Not everyone does) and hence have some intelligence. So
why did you join them?
I think their group's goals of stamping out proxy-testers and
braindumps is very laudable, but their actions are just like the
outgoing Clinton officials glueing of the "W" keys on government
computers - it doesn't show any intelligence, it just shows how
childish they are and destroys what credibility they did have. This is
a PUBLIC forum - their actions may be fine in their fraternity houses
on their college campuses, but not in the real world. Their response
to you in not acknowledging that this is a problem (but just
criticizing you further) is another sign that they are ignorant and do
not understand or care. Until they change, I will not be joining that
group, which is a shame, since I too agree with cleaning up the
certification mess.
Even the criticism of you putting your "MCP" in your signature is a
sign that some in the group's leadership deep down don't care about
increasing the values of all certifications. They just want to justify
their psychological need of putting people down and somehow believe
that this is a good method of doing so.
I would like to know why you gave them credibility for their actions
by
joining their group. "If you would like to read more about this post,
you can view this by clicking on the link below.
3. Transcender Vs. MeasureUp -> the majority of posts here doesn't
even cover this topic, instead it is filled with childish and useless
posts.
http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/898b840717f20934/61957239a6843f67?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=106&hl=en#61957239a6843f67
4. What requirement for MCSE -> First Guy posts about the requirements
for MCSE but no one other than Birol gives a useful reply. Cerebrus
and CertGuard both give useless, insulting replies and also show just
how childish and immoral they are, so how could any moral person trust
what they say without their own research:
You can view this post below:
http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/6586f7bd9e0c052/77d52a5acbd78c0d?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=121&hl=en#77d52a5acbd78c0d
I can go on and on but I think I will stop here. Please feel free to
post with regards to this information provided and give your views on
this topic. Once again, this is just my opinion that certguard
actually supports certain websites that provide braindumps and I hope
people don't get fooled by this.
Cheers!!! Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 214049
CertGuard - Is it a Scam? You Decide?
Hi IT Community,
I decided to do some research on this so called www.certguard.com. I
see post over post about these braindumps. Well, let me tell you
something, I have done some extensive research on this CertGuard
company and I warn everybody to make a decision for themselves on this
company. CertGuard claims to watch for companies that state you will
pass on your first try, any company that offers 100% Pass Guarantee
and not a 100% Money Back Guarantee, what is the difference? There is
no difference. What seems to be really funny is that my best friend
ordered off transcender.com the so called (Reader's Choice Award) and
found their questions to be identical to the real exam. So, where does
CertGuard go off stating that www.transcender.com and other sites
listed on there website are clean when in fact they are not. Every
single vendor out there put's real if not very very similar exam
questions related to the real exam. You can view the list of the so
called CertGuard's clean list below:
http://www.certguard.com/reviews.asp
Now, you see many companies listed here: "Wonder if these companies
are paying for this?"
Now, let's look at www.transcender.com the so called (Reader's Choice
Award) winner. Which many many people have stated that in fact they
do
provide the exact questions on there products.
According to Certguard.com, CertGuard states to stay away from the
below websites that state the below:
i. Every website that is owned by TestKing provides braindumps. Yes,
it's that obvious! If just ONE of TestKing's websites provides
braindumps, ALL of them do.
ii. Sites that advertise 'Actual Exam Questions & Answers' are most
likely passing off braindumps.
iii. Sites that offer a '100% Pass Guarantee on the FIRST try' (most
legitimate sites will offer a Money Back Guarantee, but this is
completely different than guaranteeing you a passing score.) Make
sure
you read their Disclaimer before you jump into any commitments. OR
ASK
US!!!!
iv. Access to ALL of their practice exams for X number of dollars is
another sign of a braindump, no legitimate corporation can afford to
just give away their material for next to nothing. We've seen
legitimate practice exam run for as little as $40 or as much as $300
per exam, but we've never seen a legitimate site offer ALL of their
Exams in a bundle for such a cheap price.
v. Legitimate Practice Exams will generally cost around $100 per CD
(or Exam), unless the Test Prep provider is offering a discount, but
even then the kits are no less than $50 per CD. If you're looking at
buying a bundle of exams for that price, then you're almost sure to
be
purchasing braindumps.
vi. PDFs!! Not every PDF is a braindump, and not every braindump is a
PDF, but the odds of getting a PDF that isn't a braindump is pretty
rare. DON'T TRUST PDFs!!!
Furthermore, you can view more about there guarantee below:
http://www.transcender.com/guarantee/
They will refund your purchase the first time if you fail. Now this is
just one of the sites I picked on CertGuard's so called clean list.
Click also the link below:
http://www.transcender.com/dept.aspx?dept%5Fid=100000
You will see an image with a guy jumping with his leg's open, Read
what it states:
You will Pass the First Time Guarantee. End Of Discussion. (This is
the exact wording used on jrksoftware.com, another well known
braindump provider)
Proof backing up my claim on transcender. Please click the below posts
in newsgroups made by people ordering from transcender.
http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcad/browse_thread/thread/4740b2d9d62ca55c/a282ee8503baa62f?lnk=st&q=transcender+real+questions&rnum=3&hl=en#a282ee8503baa62f
Below is also another post from David Mickelson stating that Microsoft
does not support transcender.
http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd/browse_thread/thread/84123cf7f578717f/4fa05c8d04b0b552?lnk=st&q=transcender+real+questions&rnum=5&hl=en#4fa05c8d04b0b552
"Yes. I did some looking back to may 28th. Here's one gentleman from
Microsoft (not part of the MS Cert Team) stating they are cheat
sheets. I followed it with my response. I believe it happened one
other time with a leader from the Microsoft Cert team a month or two
later but cannot find it. "
Davin Mickelson
Message 3 in thread
From: Davin (a...@b.com)
Subject: Re: Want to Buy Transcender 70-306
View this article only
Newsgroups: Microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcsd
Date: 2003-05-28 14:26:38 PST
Hi.
I find it interesting that Scott considers one of MCP Magazine's
(magazine
is owned and controlled by Microsoft) top sponsors as a "cheat sheet"
provider.
I was under the assumption that Transcender was not a Microsoft
Certified
Practice Test Provider (MCPTP) because of their choice not to pay
Microsoft
for the advertising/sales leads from the MS "TrainCert" web site.
http://www.microsoft.com/traincert/mcpexams/prepare/practicetests.asp
I don't know the facts. I don't work for either company.
Davin Mickelson
"Scott Moore [MSFT]" <scott...@online.microsoft.com> wrote in message
news:eu9EHpUJDHA.336@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Legitimate use of Transcender is sort of an oxymoron. They are cheat
> sheets, and MS doesn't endorse them at all.
> Scott Moore
> Microsoft Corp. - OEM Mobile Devices TAM
The link below is another post you can view on transcender's from the
user Coffee.
http://groups.google.ca/group/alt.certification.mcse/browse_thread/thread/fc929f997a2cbc7b/07825e55337c8266?lnk=st&q=transcender+real+questions&rnum=6&hl=en#07825e55337c8266
(I apologize for posting this twice I wanted it to be a new thread -
you can
also find this same message under "Re: TRANSCENDER OFFICALS BEING NOSY
IN THIS NEWSGROUP...")
You know I like the Transcenders - I have both purchased and been
given them
to use. I also agree with what is said about Braindumps to a degree. I
think
that a Braindump would be useful and should be comments from someone
who has
taken the tests but they shouldn't actually disclose the questions (or
their
wrong answers).
So heres my question - Why is it that we feel so justified in Slamming
the
likes of Cheet-sheets and in the same breath defend Transcenders?
This is a legitimate question (IOW I am not trying to be cute).
Transcender
questions a frighteningly close to the real questions so we know the
research is done in the same way that the likes of Braindumps and
Cheet-sheets -- why is it that we like to defend them just because
they have
been doing it longer -- WHY THIS WOULD BE UN-MICROSOFT OF US!
I am very interested in you comments and thoughts on this - it seems
to be a
double standard and I am going to get a kick out of you trying to
defend it.
Coffee.
I can add more and more posts on this subject regarding Transcender
but I will stop here, you can do this research yourself, but I warn
you, watch for transcender staff trying to convince you otherwise on
the newsgroups.
To make a long story short, no one really knows if CertGuard is
getting paid off, only they know. It is so funny on how they defend
websites that they state are clean when people who have actually
ordered from those sites state otherwise.
My opinions are expressed below on the whole topic of braindumps and
CertGuard: Please feel free to comment on this.
1. Braindumps don't hurt the IT industry. The Hiring Managers
Incompetence is what is Hurting the IT industry. What's hurting the IT
industry are incompetent hiring managers. When hiring IT staff, it is
up to the employer to determine the applicant has the necessary IT
skills and knowledge to perform in their job to back up their
certification, and not just assume they do simply because they are
certified. People who use braindumps and just plain memorize questions
are easily detected by any competent hiring manager during the first
interview.
For example, if we were to compare 2 candidates with a CCNA
certification being interviewed for the same job, and lets say one
studied via CCNA instructor led classes and books, and the other
simply braindumps. During the first interview, the hiring manager
would surely ask the candidates some technical questions based on
their CCNA assumed knowledge and skills like describe the OSI layers
and their functions or something like this. The candidate that only
memorized the braindumps to pass the exam would not know how to reply
where as the candidate who studied hard would easily be able to answer
the question.
I know when I was interviewed for my job, I was tested on configuring
a Cisco router with NAT, also doing an IOS upgrade on a router, and
configuring MPLS on the router. I passed but the manager took extra
steps to ensure that I did indeed know what I was talking about. So,
what I am saying is to educate managers and companies to test there
employee's instead of just assuming that they are good.
2. CertGuard looks to me to support braindump sites, and possibly has
a financial interest in their supposed clean list of sites it
supports. CertGaurd clearly offers only biased information so take
everything you read from any of them carefully, in fact, I would not
trust them at all!
Reasons they are exploiting the IT industry is because they clearly
state certain sites are clean when any newbie to this industry can
tell they are not, and also because they are profiting from selling
advertising space on their website all in the name of their bogus war
on IT Braindumps and cheaters.
How do we know if any of them are actually certified? How did they get
their certifications? Maybe they bought them from testking? How can we
trust a group of online posters who seem to use Nazi-Like rhetoric and
Communist type phrases? Don't take my word for it, just check any of
their posts and you will surely see this to be the case.
Clearly, by simple investigation anyone can see that many of the sites
Certguard supports are Braindumps ie. QuickCert.com, Trancender.com,
Certways.com, jrksoftware.com etc...
Could it be possible that Certguard is receiving some form of
financial compensation for their support of these known braindump
providers? I would have to say yes since their War on Braindumps etc..
is simply an exploit of this issue for financial gain as they are
selling advertising on their website.
As we all know, if something sounds too good to be true, it usually
is. This has been my experience specifically with Certguard. At first
glance, I thought, finally, someone who will actually do something to
clean up the IT industry, but after really looking into their website,
it seems 100% clear that they have a financial interest in this so
called War on Braindumps. I would like to suggest that Robert Williams
rename this war to "My War Against Braindump Sites I Am Not Profiting
From!" because clearly as you will see below, many of the sites listed
on his bogus clean list are actually well know braindumps sites which
are probably paying him:
- QuickCert.com - They Claim this site is clean:
http://www.certguard.com/forums/topic.asp?TID=450
Clearly, this site is not clean because they have a direct link from
certifyexpress.com, braindumpcentral.com, braindumps.com, which
Certguard knows is a Testking owned website and a well known braindump
promoting site as you will see below:
On the homepage of certifyexpress.com, you will notice the very top
banner advertising for Testking.com, then the one just below it
advertising for Quickcert.com, and then there are 3 links for Actual-
Exams.com, Testking.com and you guessed it, Quickcert.com. Clearly,
you cannot dispute this evidence and clearly, certguard must have some
financial interest in promoting quickcert.com.
Here is another list from a CertGuard post which lists Braindump free
sites: http://www.certguard.com/forums/topic.asp?TID=270 out of this
list, there are clearly well KNOWN braindump sites like:
Certways.com - a well known braindump site most likely owned by
Testking with hosting on the same server as:
- Examways.com
- Examworx.com
jrksoftware.com - a longtime braindump provider using the EasyCert
name their homepage clearly states "you will pass the first time
guaranteed! In the left menu bar with a pic of a girl jumping for joy.
A simple backlink check will show that they have an incoming link from
Examblasters.com, which is also another braindump site:
http://www.google.com/search?q=link:http://www.jrksoftware.com/&hl=en&start=10&sa=N
gocertify.com - they claim to be clean, however they have a link on
their site for Practice Tests with goes to goexam.com which seems to
be their cover to sell braindumps with a Pass Guarantee and 25% - 50%
off their products.
Transcender.com - They provide a Pass on Your First Try Guarantee and
practice tests that contain actual exam questions. I know this
firsthand as my best friend used their material about 1 year ago and
found this to be the case. Surely not clean and also seems to have an
affiliate as listed next.
studyexam4less.com/transcender.asp - They also provide braindumps and
are well known to be doing this for some time now. They even have
their own page outlining the 100% Pass Guarantee here:
studyexam4less.com/Transcender-Pass-the-exam-the-first-time-
Guarantee.asp
certsavvy.com - offers a Pass the First Time Guarantee and is known to
provide real exam questions
3. CertGuard is Childish, Immoral and Useless.
They seem to always provide Useless info and no help for newcomers to
the IT industry and often end up insulting and or threatening your
legitimate beginner questions. CertGuard doesn't seem like a group of
people I would trust with my career choices so be very careful and
think for yourself.
Here is a perfect example of what I am talking about:
Post Topic: What requirement for MCSE
The First Guy posts about the requirements for MCSE but no one other
than Birol gives a useful reply. Cerebrus (who works for certguard)
and Certguard both give useless, insulting replies and also show just
how childish and immoral they are, so how could any one trust what
such rude and immoral people say, without doing their own research:
http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/898b840717f20934/61957239a6843f67?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=106&hl=en#61957239a6843f67
CertGuard Wrote:
> JJ Gitties wrote :
>> you need to buy arab/english dictionary.
> No, he doesn't. BTW, your name sounds very similar to somethings that
> I like very much ! :P
LMAO...I presume you mean DD Titties...I thought the same damb thing
when he
walked in.
...and I'll bet every damb one of us old pervs here did. ;)
Cerebrus Wrote:
> LMAO...I presume you mean DD Titties...I thought the same damb thing when he
> walked in.
> ...and I'll bet every damb one of us old pervs here did. ;)
Holy cow ! Not you too ! :P
I would never every trust my career choices with anything these
animals say. They are basically wolves in sheeps clothing, trying to
make a buck all while not helping and rudely poking fun at anyone that
comes into their path!
And if you think I am making this up, just check any of their posts
and you will surely see their wolf like attitude speak out loud:
This is in addition to what Larry J West has stated about certguard
for which I agree 100%:
http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcdst/browse_thread/thread/b913082dda4522e6/a6dd48bde6adf5f1?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=76&hl=en#a6dd48bde6adf5f1
Larry States:
You are right that many in the MCNGP / CertGuard group are very
childish, rude beyond belief, and in most cases [90% of the time] not
very helpful. Their insulting of people for no reason who are trying
to help people is truly beyond my comprehension, especially since
these are people who are supposedly knowledgeable enough on computers
to know that UseNet exists (Not
everyone does) and hence have some intelligence.
So why did you join them? I think their group's goals of stamping out
proxy-testers and braindumps is very laudable, but their actions are
just like the outgoing Clinton officials
glueing of the "W" keys on government computers - it doesn't show any
intelligence, it just shows how childish they are and destroys what
credibility they did have. This is a PUBLIC forum - their actions may
be fine in their fraternity houses on their college campuses, but not
in the real world. Their response to you in not acknowledging that
this is a problem (but just
criticizing you further) is another sign that they are ignorant and do
not understand or care. Until they change, I will not be joining that
group, which is a shame, since I too agree with cleaning up the
certification mess.
Even the criticism of you putting your "MCP" in your signature is a
sign that some in the group's leadership deep down don't care about
increasing the values of all certifications. They just want to justify
their psychological need of putting people down and somehow believe
that this is a good method of doing so.
I would like to know why you gave them credibility for their actions
by joining their group.
4. CertGuard Is not to be Trusted?
Just read any of their posts and replies and you will certainly agree
that they are offensive, rude, not willing to help and in the end,
fraudulent as they claim to provide support for clean sites when they
actually support braindump type sites.
5. CertGuard should issue a War on Incompetent Managers. But there is
no financial gain in doing that! It is 100% up to the hiring manager
to weed out unqualified applicants, in reality, no one cares about
braindumps. Because there is no financial gain in this reality,
certguard will never come to grips with this and seems to continue to
pursue their fake war on cheaters!
These are just my opinions made by facts and observations that I have
seen and listed with regards to Certguard.com. You make you own
decision?
I have listed posts below that you can view and see for yourself on
this so called CertGuard company:
1. Many arguments that CertGuard may be covering and providing
braindumps:
http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/5d98421a377bcb3b/9a3a6262b88ed1b1?lnk=st&q=certguard&rnum=2&hl=en#9a3a6262b88ed1b1
2. Exams Required for MCSE -> LarryWestMCSD (5th post down) states
that CertGuard is childish, rude and most of all not helpful. This is
exactly what we want to say about them in addition to their support of
apparent braindump sites and exploiting this War on Braindumps for a
profit via website advertising. Below is a quote taken from this post.
http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcdst/browse_thread/thread/b913082dda4522e6/a6dd48bde6adf5f1?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=76&hl=en#a6dd48bde6adf5f1
"You are right that many in the MCNGP / CertGuard group are very
childish, rude beyond belief, and in most cases [90% of the time] not
very helpful.
Their insulting of people for no reason who are trying to help people
is truly beyond my comprehension, especially since these are people
who are supposedly knowledgeable enough on computers to know that
UseNet exists (Not everyone does) and hence have some intelligence. So
why did you join them?
I think their group's goals of stamping out proxy-testers and
braindumps is very laudable, but their actions are just like the
outgoing Clinton officials glueing of the "W" keys on government
computers - it doesn't show any intelligence, it just shows how
childish they are and destroys what credibility they did have. This is
a PUBLIC forum - their actions may be fine in their fraternity houses
on their college campuses, but not in the real world. Their response
to you in not acknowledging that this is a problem (but just
criticizing you further) is another sign that they are ignorant and do
not understand or care. Until they change, I will not be joining that
group, which is a shame, since I too agree with cleaning up the
certification mess.
Even the criticism of you putting your "MCP" in your signature is a
sign that some in the group's leadership deep down don't care about
increasing the values of all certifications. They just want to justify
their psychological need of putting people down and somehow believe
that this is a good method of doing so.
I would like to know why you gave them credibility for their actions
by
joining their group. "If you would like to read more about this post,
you can view this by clicking on the link below.
3. Transcender Vs. MeasureUp -> the majority of posts here doesn't
even cover this topic, instead it is filled with childish and useless
posts.
http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/898b840717f20934/61957239a6843f67?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=106&hl=en#61957239a6843f67
4. What requirement for MCSE -> First Guy posts about the requirements
for MCSE but no one other than Birol gives a useful reply. Cerebrus
and CertGuard both give useless, insulting replies and also show just
how childish and immoral they are, so how could any moral person trust
what they say without their own research:
CertGuard Wrote:
> JJ Gitties wrote :
>> you need to buy arab/english dictionary.
> No, he doesn't. BTW, your name sounds very similar to somethings that
> I like very much ! :P
LMAO...I presume you mean DD Titties...I thought the same damb thing
when he
walked in.
...and I'll bet every damb one of us old pervs here did. ;)
Cerebrus Wrote:
> LMAO...I presume you mean DD Titties...I thought the same damb thing when he
> walked in.
> ...and I'll bet every damb one of us old pervs here did. ;)
Holy cow ! Not you too ! :P
You can view this post below:
http://groups.google.ca/group/microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse/browse_thread/thread/6586f7bd9e0c052/77d52a5acbd78c0d?lnk=gst&q=certguard&rnum=121&hl=en#77d52a5acbd78c0d
I can go on and on but I think I will stop here. Please feel free to
post with regards to this information provided and give your views on
this topic. Once again, this is just my opinion that certguard
actually supports certain websites that provide braindumps and I hope
people don't get fooled by this.
Cheers!!! Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 214047
Hi All need some advice
Hi all
I have been pondering about doing my MCP 70-290 2003 Server, I user
2003 every day and have done my A+ and CCNA and started doing my 2000
MCP but never got time to finish it
Can any one recommend a good self study kit. I hear many mixed things
about the Microsoft kits but i need something that I can really get my
teeth stuck into.
Also does anyone know of any of the good online test sites that mirror
the MCP tests ?
Im looking to put my every day practice to the test and see what I can
do.
Cheers
Ethan Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 214037
70-284 Exam Format
I have not seen as posting on this board as to the test format of 70-284. Are
there only test questions or does it include simulations.
--
ray3d84 Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 214035
Which way is better ?
Hello everybody,
I am an MCSA 2003 certified i would like to have an expert advice
about where should i go next?
should i complete MCSE or ... etc, there are so many Choices.
I really like all the new technology but i have an error :D i don't
know any programming language.
Could i get some help ?.. Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 214026
Could this be where it all starts??
The headline reads: Schools say iPods becoming tool for cheaters.
You'd think it was regarding certification tests, or even college exams, but
nope...
http://www.cnn.com/2007/EDUCATION/04/27/ipod.cheating.ap/index.html?eref=rss_offbeat
Should those be the people we (read CertGuard) need to be focusing our efforts
on? How do you get a point across to kids that weren't raised properly to begin
with?
--
CertGuard
Get the new 'No Braindump' CertGear
http://www.cafepress.com/certguard Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 214015
MCP site access
I have just passed one MCSE exam, how can I get further information to
access the MCP member site? Will MSFT send an e-mail to me later regarding
this matter? Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 214013
MCP Imposters
I've come across a couple of folks in my district who I am almost sure are
MCP and MCSE imposters.
As someone who is an MCP I find this trickery unacceptable.
How can I check their status (MCP) and what do i do about it?
Does MS follow up on this sort of thing? Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 214001
Unemployed?
Got that ol' MCSE and still can't find a j-o-b? Me, too.
Click on over to
http://www.unemployedmcse.com
and bitch and complain all you want. It'll make ME feel better, and it'll
make YOU feel better, too.
You would THINK, anyway. Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213983
OT: A website truly worthy of your time...
While you, the atypical MCNGP criminal, are sitting here wasting company
time, stealing from your employer by posting messages that have no relevance
to anything (and looking over your shoulder in case he or she is watching),
you are missing out on an amazing world of beauty and feminity that has been
right under your nose all along...
It's... a travesty!
http://fatwonderwoman.blogspot.com/ Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213976
Must Read
An excellent resource on ISA Server providing in depth knowledge of
configuration, bypassing proxy service, filtering cache entries,
disabling traffic and much more. Worth reading!!
http://www.it-techexperts.com/MCSE/MCSEISA.asp Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213968
70-290 Exam.
Hi.. All
Iam planning to take my 70-290 Exam in the month of May.. Pls let me know if
any nice offers is going on for the time being. now...
Tks
Sunil Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213967
OT: Recommendation on Imaging Software
Suffice to say I am out of the loop with drive imaging software
nowadays. I am doing research on the major brands on the market, but
wanted your feedback on what you use -- advantages / disadvantages.
Situation: 4 PC SMB that requires very minimal downtime due to its
promised deadlines. I need imaging software that will restore the PC
back to its original state before the failure. This software also needs
to perform a daily snapshot (image backup) automatically.
Any recommendation?
--
Michael D. Alligood, MCSA, MCDST
The I.T. Classroom - http://www.theitclassroom.com/
CertGuard - http://www.certguard.com Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213956
OT: Tuesday Titilation
A Treasure Trove of Golden Poastings:
http://groups.google.com/groups?wp_ml=0&as_q=&num=10&scoring=r&as_epq=&as_oq=&as_eq=&as_ugroup=&as_usubject=&as_uauthors=Vigo+Breadcrumbs&lr=lang_en&as_drrb=q&as_qdr=&as_mind=1&as_minm=1&as_miny=1981&as_maxd=24&as_maxm=4&as_maxy=2007&safe=off
http://tinyurl.com/276cgy?wp_ml=0
Because I'm too impatient to wait for Neil to post them all on the sekrit
web site.
COME BACK UNCLE VIGO!
I wonder if the dot communists won. Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213949
OT: A star is born
Tomorrow we will be invaded by a production crew filming
"Yellow Handkerchief" starring William Hurt.
http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0954990/
They hired our parking lot (for $500) to set up a catering
tent which I and my fellow employees have been invited to
have full access to. Free breakfast and lunch, and a chance
to get discovered.
They're filming at Dot's Diner which is just behind our
building and they needed a lot of extra space for their
stuff.
Now if I could just figure out how to get an MCNGP sign
stuck up somewhere...
Anyway, if anyone has something they want me to as Bill, I
mean Mr Hurt, let me know. I'm sure he'll invite me to play
golf or fly in his Gulfstream, you know.
0x22 Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213939
Re: Found out MCSE will be faced out in 2008. whats the alternative th
On Apr 24, 6:24 am, Neil <guess...@gmail.com> wrote:
> FINE! there are 4 on the stupers3krut site. under teh "Best of"
Thankee from the bottom of my heart. May the "breadcrumbs" help you
find your way to salvation ! Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213926
how many case studies on the 70-297 exam ?
Hi im planning on taking the 70-297 exam this week and i would like to
know how many case studies or questions i should expect and how much
time is given Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213879
how many case studies on the 70-297 exam ?
Hi im planning on taking the 70-97 exam this week and i would like to
know how many case studies or questions i should expect and how much
time is given Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213878
MCSA/MCSE 2000 -> 2003
Greetings everyone,
A couple of years ago I had taken and passed both 70-210, 70-215, and also
have my A+ and Network+ Certifications. This of course means that I am 1 test
(70-218) away from my MCSA in Windows 2000.
This is where the tricky part begins.
I want to convert this ultimately into an MCSE 2003 without de-valueing the
210,215, and 218 exams. This means, I don't want to take the equivalents for
the 2003 exam if I don't have to.
I could go the "upgrade track" for MCSA in 2000 to 2003, but does it "stop
there" meaning, in order to be considered an MCSE 2003, do I need to take and
pass all of the specifically required exams? Or after I upgrade from MCSA
2000 to 2003, can I continue on to the 2003 MCSE track?
--
Michael Cramer
A+/Net+ Certified Technician
Future MCSA 2003 Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213875
OT: And you thought it was just the french ?
This is real funny ! (Turn your speakers on)
<http://tcc.itc.it/people/rocchi/fun/europe.html>
SFW. Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213859
Semi-OT: Braindumps on TV
Anyone happen to catch ER last nght? I rarely watch it, but I did last
night. At one point, while in the emergency room working on a patient, John
Stamos' character says to Mekhi Phifer's character, "I'll see if I can get
your brother a copy of last year's EMT exam." (paraphrasing)
So, the question I pose to my fellow members: Are you with me in boycotting
NBC, for allowing such a travesty to occur during primetime? I wouldn't be
so upset if this was a late-night comedy. But it's a primetime drama.
Millions of people saw this, and now they could potentially think this is
the right thing to do. Please join me in boycotting NBC. Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213830
Found out MCSE will be faced out in 2008. whats the alternative th
am interested in going into IT by taking a course in MCSE and getting
certified but i found out MCSE will be faced out in 2008. can someone please
let me know what alternative certification is out there which is equivalent
to the MCSE.
Thanks
Jay. Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213829
OT: it's all in the translation
racism - yet another side effect of outsourcing
http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,267184,00.html Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213812
Practise Exams
Can anyone tell me where I can obtain couple of Exam 70-284 practice
questions for free?
Any help will be greatly appreciated Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213805
Canadian Deal - Feedback requested
I found this one the MS site. Nice to see a deal for Canadians, instead of
US only.
It looks like a pretty good deal! What does everyone else think? $649 Cdn.
I have heard you will not be able to upgrade to Longhorn from 2000, MS is
going to orphan it like they did NT Certs.
What do you get?
. Access to Microsoft eLearning courses: 2274, 2275, 2277
. Live Tutor to coach you through every step of your learning and
study plan
. Exam preparation for exam # 70-292
. Free exam voucher
. Personal learning guide to maximize your online training experience
. 40% off of your "Longhorn" upgrade exam (If your MCSA, Windows
Server 2003 credentials are completed by June 30th, 2007)
http://www.microsoft.com/canada/learning/mcp/upgrade/ws2003/default.mspx Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213800
Obtain MCSE 2003 Without Exams( MCP + MCSA 2003 Free) 100% Passing Gaurantee.!!!!
hi friends
if anyone need to clear MCSE,MCSA,MCDBA,MCSD,MCSD.NET,CCNA,CCNP,A+,N
+,SECURITY+Without exams and study..
we will give the exams on ur bahalf..make u pass in that and charge
some extra amount from u..
Then here the search END..
Benifits:-
1. No need to Give EXAMS by Urself.
2. Need not to go on any testing site to give exams.
3. 100% Passing Gaurantee.
4. U have to pay US after checking ur results online.
5. Got certifications at ur Doorstep.
Things we Need from the candidates :-
1. Their full name ( that he need to appear on his scoresheet and
certificate).
2. Their Full address ( for certificaiton De;ivery)
3. Their Passport And Driving liciense colour scan copy(as photo id
proof)
4. Cell as well as landline number with country code
5. Correct exam numbers( that candidates want to do)
procedure :-
Provide us ur these detials then we will sit on our own several
testing site (vue and prometric both)
do ur exams and then send u ur scorehseets..by using that scoresheet u
will easily able to check ur
result online...and when u will check ur results...only then u have to
send us payment.
No Payment in advance required..but in the case of microsoft exams
only..
for other tests candidate need to send us half payment in advance..
prices :-
Microsoft any exam :- 400 usd
ccna :- 999 usd
ccnp :- 1200 usd each exam
comptia A+ :- 1400 usd each exam
comptia net+ :- 1300 usd
comptia security + = 1300 usd
Citrix each exam :- 1000 usd
sap each exam :- 1200 usd
oracle 9i :- 3400 usd
oracle 10g :- 4800 ussd
Microsoft Business Solution each exam :-1500usd(including exam fee)
contact info :-
mail us at :- all_certs@yahoo.com Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213794
OT: CompTIA exams as electives for the MCSA 2000
Apologize for blasting this in all certification newsgroups, but I
cannot remember where this question originated from -- or who asked it.
But I promised to look into it and get an answer. The question was
concerning the MCSA 2000 electives and why it changed from Network+ and
A+ combo to Server+ and A+ combo. After speaking with Rob Linsky,
Product Manager of I.T. Certification for Microsoft, this is an error on
the website. The Network+ and A+ combo still counts as an elective for
the MCSA 2000 certification.
--
Michael D. Alligood, MCSA, MCDST
The I.T. Classroom - http://www.theitclassroom.com/
CertGuard - http://www.certguard.com Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213792
Need MCSE Book
I am intending to start my MCSE exam preparation and live in Sydney,
Australia. If any one has book to sell out, please contact me at the
following email address or number
imran_ilm5@hotmail.com
0432073698 Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213760
Exam options ?
I have today, passed 70-219 W2000 AD Infrastucture Admin. Over the last few
months I have passed 70-215, 70-210, 70-218, 70-216, 70-229, 70-228. This
give me MCSA 2000 and a MCDBA 2000.
I am now looking at doing a design exam (to complete the MCSE) but haven't a
clue which one to do. I want to maximise my certs so I am leaning towards
70-220 (Designing W2000 Security) because it will be useful for the
MCSA\MCSE 2000 Security accreditation. My next step (after the design exam)
however, is to upgrade the MCSA/MCSE to 2003.
Can anyone tell me if I upgrade to MCSE 2003 will a MCSE 2000 Security
accreditation be upgraded to. Also if I finish the MCSE with 70-220, then
upgrade, can I just do the one exam to make it a MCSE 2000 Security ?
I can't find this info on the MS Website.
Thanks
Richard Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213753
RRAS: need explanation for a question from the 70-291 MSPress book
Hello,
Can anyone please explain me the answer from the MSPress Book 70-291 (page
9-84) for the following question:
"You have deployed a Windows Server 2003 computer running the Routing And
Remote Access Service router to function as a simple firewall. How many
packet filters do you need to create to support remote access to a VPN server
through L2TP/IPSec? Assume that you want to provide the strictest security
standards."
Answer:
Twelve
Thanks a lot for your answers Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213748
Looking for MCPs to link to my company
Hello fellow Microsoft test takers.
I have a growing IT Consulting company in Manhattan and am trying to
advance my Microsoft partnership status. To do that I need a couple
of MCPs or MCSEs. I'm ramping up to start growing this business in
July, so if you would let me tie your MCP number to my company I would
consider you for work in the future. Right now I don't have any extra
work, but hopefully during the summer I will need lots of help.
Or if your number isn't linked to another company and you just want to
help, it would be much appreciated.
Let me know if your interested,
Kacey Fern, MCSE
INTERLiNK TECHNOLOGIES
kfern@interlinktechnologies.com
Linking Technology between the World and You
www.interlinktechnologies.com Tag: ÈÃ֪ʶÓë²Æ¸»¹²ÓµÓУ¡ Tag: 213736