How are they scoring exam 292. I took that exam 3 times
and failed. I could have sworn I did well on the exam.
I think I just failed one section.

Re: 070-292 by Neil

Neil
Fri Feb 11 21:32:46 CST 2005

did you hear "Dennis" <anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> say in
news:184401c51088$576942c0$a401280a@phx.gbl:

> How are they scoring exam 292. I took that exam 3 times
> and failed. I could have sworn I did well on the exam.
> I think I just failed one section.
>

sorry about your luck, but it would appear that you weren't quite there.
The exams should be hard (IMHO) as this increases the value of the
certification. I highly doubt that MS will just open up and let you know
how they are running their testing program for your benefit and that of
all others who might be listening. If you are really ticked drop a line
to mcphelp@microsoft.com and vent your frustrations. I don't think there
is too much they can do for you. try again or if you prefer take the
exams individually.

--
Neil MCNGP #30

- 'Bother', said Pooh as he stuffed Piglet's corpse into a trash bag

Re: 070-292 by anonymous

anonymous
Tue Feb 22 23:38:56 CST 2005


>-----Original Message-----
>did you hear "Dennis"
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> say in
>news:184401c51088$576942c0$a401280a@phx.gbl:
>
>> How are they scoring exam 292. I took that exam 3
times
>> and failed. I could have sworn I did well on the
exam.
>> I think I just failed one section.
>>
>
>sorry about your luck, but it would appear that you
weren't quite there.
>The exams should be hard (IMHO) as this increases the
value of the
>certification. I highly doubt that MS will just open up
and let you know
>how they are running their testing program for your
benefit and that of
>all others who might be listening. If you are really
ticked drop a line
>to mcphelp@microsoft.com and vent your frustrations. I
don't think there
>is too much they can do for you. try again or if you
prefer take the
>exams individually.
>
>--
>Neil MCNGP #30
>
>- 'Bother', said Pooh as he stuffed Piglet's corpse into
a trash bag
>.
>

Re: 070-292 by sb

sb
Tue Feb 22 23:47:15 CST 2005

Stop being so arrogant! Microsoft does score the 70-29x
exams differently. I talked to them on the phone and they
said each question is weighted differently so even if you
get between 75-80% of the questions right - there could
be a question that you missed that was worth more points
than some of the others and you could still fail the
exam. I would be prepared to answer every question
correct the next time you take the test. Don't expect to
get by with getting a few wrong because it won't work.
You never know which question is worth what. They
(Microsoft) call it test integrity. I call it test how we
can flunk you and make you pay us more money to take it
again.


>-----Original Message-----
>did you hear "Dennis"
<anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com> say in
>news:184401c51088$576942c0$a401280a@phx.gbl:
>
>> How are they scoring exam 292. I took that exam 3
times
>> and failed. I could have sworn I did well on the
exam.
>> I think I just failed one section.
>>
>
>sorry about your luck, but it would appear that you
weren't quite there.
>The exams should be hard (IMHO) as this increases the
value of the
>certification. I highly doubt that MS will just open up
and let you know
>how they are running their testing program for your
benefit and that of
>all others who might be listening. If you are really
ticked drop a line
>to mcphelp@microsoft.com and vent your frustrations. I
don't think there
>is too much they can do for you. try again or if you
prefer take the
>exams individually.
>
>--
>Neil MCNGP #30
>
>- 'Bother', said Pooh as he stuffed Piglet's corpse into
a trash bag
>.
>

Re: 070-292 by fygar

fygar
Wed Feb 23 07:57:58 CST 2005

On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:47:15 -0800, "sb"
<sb@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:

>Stop being so arrogant! Microsoft does score the 70-29x
>exams differently. I talked to them on the phone and they
>said each question is weighted differently so even if you
>get between 75-80% of the questions right - there could
>be a question that you missed that was worth more points
>than some of the others and you could still fail the
>exam. I would be prepared to answer every question
>correct the next time you take the test. Don't expect to
>get by with getting a few wrong because it won't work.
>You never know which question is worth what. They
>(Microsoft) call it test integrity. I call it test how we
>can flunk you and make you pay us more money to take it
>again.
>
>

If you only got it right 75 or 80% of the time in my shop when
troubleshooting broken systems or even setting up new ones, I would
fire you unceremoniously if I hired you because of your MCSE
credential.

Yesterday, the president of my company got his machine reformatted and
reinstalled because the person working on it missed a symptom and
boogered it up trying irrelevent stuff. So there's some lost hours of
productivity for both of them, plus I now have to have a meeting with
this person to decide how to deal with it. The person has recently
"earned" the MCDST credential.

I say the test should be MORE comprehensive and MORE expensive if we
are to trust it as a hiring tool.

...butch(tired of poor IT staffing)

Re: 070-292 by The

The
Wed Feb 23 08:03:22 CST 2005

<snipage>
fire you unceremoniously
</snipage>

Looks like someone used Words Thesauruses. :)

--
"The Rev" MCT/MCNGP #44
I may sound arrogant at times, but that's only because I'm always right.

Memories fade but a Google search never forgets.
justafreak.com
.
"fygar" <cpudoc10@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:232p11hbgcefff5h6fq189pa4ccqp1vuip@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 21:47:15 -0800, "sb"
> <sb@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
>
> >Stop being so arrogant! Microsoft does score the 70-29x
> >exams differently. I talked to them on the phone and they
> >said each question is weighted differently so even if you
> >get between 75-80% of the questions right - there could
> >be a question that you missed that was worth more points
> >than some of the others and you could still fail the
> >exam. I would be prepared to answer every question
> >correct the next time you take the test. Don't expect to
> >get by with getting a few wrong because it won't work.
> >You never know which question is worth what. They
> >(Microsoft) call it test integrity. I call it test how we
> >can flunk you and make you pay us more money to take it
> >again.
> >
> >
>
> If you only got it right 75 or 80% of the time in my shop when
> troubleshooting broken systems or even setting up new ones, I would
> fire you unceremoniously if I hired you because of your MCSE
> credential.
>
> Yesterday, the president of my company got his machine reformatted and
> reinstalled because the person working on it missed a symptom and
> boogered it up trying irrelevent stuff. So there's some lost hours of
> productivity for both of them, plus I now have to have a meeting with
> this person to decide how to deal with it. The person has recently
> "earned" the MCDST credential.
>
> I say the test should be MORE comprehensive and MORE expensive if we
> are to trust it as a hiring tool.
>
> ...butch(tired of poor IT staffing)



Re: 070-292 by fygar

fygar
Wed Feb 23 08:13:25 CST 2005

On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:03:22 -0500, "The Rev \(MCT\)"
<therev@nospam.com> wrote:

><snipage>
>fire you unceremoniously
></snipage>
>
>Looks like someone used Words Thesauruses. :)

no, that came straight from my aortic pump.



...butch()

Re: 070-292 by The

The
Wed Feb 23 11:52:23 CST 2005

Aortic pump eh? LOL

--
"The Rev" MCT/MCNGP #44
I may sound arrogant at times, but that's only because I'm always right.

Memories fade but a Google search never forgets.
justafreak.com
.
"fygar" <cpudoc10@hotmail.com> wrote in message
news:eq3p11prtlmfdoh20d6u0puf9ber7t1v9g@4ax.com...
> On Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:03:22 -0500, "The Rev \(MCT\)"
> <therev@nospam.com> wrote:
>
> ><snipage>
> >fire you unceremoniously
> ></snipage>
> >
> >Looks like someone used Words Thesauruses. :)
>
> no, that came straight from my aortic pump.
>
>
>
> ...butch()



Re: 070-292 by JaR

JaR
Wed Feb 23 12:23:18 CST 2005

In microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, The Rev (MCT) climbed on a soapbox &
opined:

> Aortic pump eh? LOL
>

A momentary closure of an ocular covering should be as adequate as a
vertical movement of the cranium to an equine devoid of visual capability

--
JaR
Thug 10110
Click on MCNGP.com and obfuscate the vernacular

Re: 070-292 by Briscobar

Briscobar
Wed Feb 23 12:37:33 CST 2005

In news:Xns960669AEC65D2plentespamsuxsofthom@207.46.248.16,
JaR <plente@spamsuxsofthome.net> rambled:
> In microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, The Rev (MCT) climbed on a
> soapbox & opined:
>
>> Aortic pump eh? LOL
>>
>
> A momentary closure of an ocular covering should be as adequate as a
> vertical movement of the cranium to an equine devoid of visual
> capability

Generously perform that which is required.

--

KB - MCNGP "silent thug" #26

Briscobar AT gmail DOT com

Cyrnfr ivfvg jjj.zpatc.pbz



Re: 070-292 by JaR

JaR
Wed Feb 23 13:13:34 CST 2005

In microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, Briscobar climbed on a soapbox &
opined:

> In news:Xns960669AEC65D2plentespamsuxsofthom@207.46.248.16,
> JaR <plente@spamsuxsofthome.net> rambled:
>> In microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, The Rev (MCT) climbed on a
>> soapbox & opined:
>>
>>> Aortic pump eh? LOL
>>>
>>
>> A momentary closure of an ocular covering should be as adequate as a
>> vertical movement of the cranium to an equine devoid of visual
>> capability
>
> Generously perform that which is required.
>

Medially, not laterally.

--
JaR
Thug 10110
Click on MCNGP.com and enlarge the lesion

Re: 070-292 by Briscobar

Briscobar
Wed Feb 23 14:00:35 CST 2005

In news:Xns9606723487D13plentespamsuxsofthom@207.46.248.16,
JaR <plente@spamsuxsofthome.net> rambled:
> In microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, Briscobar climbed on a soapbox &
> opined:
>
>> In news:Xns960669AEC65D2plentespamsuxsofthom@207.46.248.16,
>> JaR <plente@spamsuxsofthome.net> rambled:
>>> In microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, The Rev (MCT) climbed on a
>>> soapbox & opined:
>>>
>>>> Aortic pump eh? LOL
>>>>
>>>
>>> A momentary closure of an ocular covering should be as adequate as a
>>> vertical movement of the cranium to an equine devoid of visual
>>> capability
>>
>> Generously perform that which is required.
>>
>
> Medially, not laterally.

The female offspring, who comes from your loins, she struck my canine by
using the terminal portion of one of her lower limbs.

--

KB - MCNGP "silent thug" #26

Briscobar AT gmail DOT com

nerd32768 needs your business. Visit www.mcngp.com today.



Re: 070-292 by Neil

Neil
Wed Feb 23 14:03:57 CST 2005

did you hear JaR <plente@spamsuxsofthome.net> say in
news:Xns960669AEC65D2plentespamsuxsofthom@207.46.248.16:

> A momentary closure of an ocular covering should be as adequate as a
> vertical movement of the cranium to an equine devoid of visual capability

a wink is as good as a nod to a blind...horse? I thought it was blind bat?

--
Neil MCNGP#30

- An unbreakable toy is useful for breaking other toys.

Re: 070-292 by Briscobar

Briscobar
Wed Feb 23 14:09:19 CST 2005

In news:Xns96069940A918Dneilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16,
Neil <guess!!!@gmail.com> rambled:
> did you hear JaR <plente@spamsuxsofthome.net> say in
> news:Xns960669AEC65D2plentespamsuxsofthom@207.46.248.16:
>
> a wink is as good as a nod to a blind...horse? I thought it was blind
> bat?

you silly head

--

KB - MCNGP "silent thug" #26

Briscobar AT gmail DOT com

nerd32768 vowed to kill my family if I didn't add a link to
www.mcngp.com to my signature.



Re: 070-292 by Neil

Neil
Wed Feb 23 14:09:45 CST 2005

did you hear "Briscobar" <youcant@sendmespam.com> say in
news:OU5MCJeGFHA.3472@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:

> The female offspring, who comes from your loins, she struck my canine by
> using the terminal portion of one of her lower limbs.

singular pronoun opposite of the first person attempts to confound.

--
Neil MCNGP#30

- No, I'm not an elitist. Why do you ask, peasant?

Re: 070-292 by billLASTINIT

billLASTINIT
Wed Feb 23 14:11:26 CST 2005

Briscobar wrote:
> In news:Xns9606723487D13plentespamsuxsofthom@207.46.248.16,
> JaR <plente@spamsuxsofthome.net> rambled:
>> In microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, Briscobar climbed on a soapbox &
>> opined:
>>
>>> In news:Xns960669AEC65D2plentespamsuxsofthom@207.46.248.16,
>>> JaR <plente@spamsuxsofthome.net> rambled:
>>>> In microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, The Rev (MCT) climbed on a
>>>> soapbox & opined:
>>>>
>>>>> Aortic pump eh? LOL
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> A momentary closure of an ocular covering should be as adequate as
>>>> a vertical movement of the cranium to an equine devoid of visual
>>>> capability
>>>
>>> Generously perform that which is required.
>>>
>>
>> Medially, not laterally.
>
> The female offspring, who comes from your loins, she struck my canine
> by using the terminal portion of one of her lower limbs.

I WISH YOU GREAT FORTUNE IN YOUR INCARCERATION.

Re: 070-292 by Briscobar

Briscobar
Wed Feb 23 14:15:44 CST 2005

In news:Xns96069A3CBC550neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16,
Neil <guess!!!@gmail.com> rambled:
> did you hear "Briscobar" <youcant@sendmespam.com> say in
> news:OU5MCJeGFHA.3472@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>
>> The female offspring, who comes from your loins, she struck my
>> canine by using the terminal portion of one of her lower limbs.
>
> singular pronoun opposite of the first person attempts to confound.

I presume that you are in posession of the device which attaches papers
together via a metal clip that belongs to me.

--

KB - MCNGP "silent thug" #26

Briscobar AT gmail DOT com

www.mcngp.com is real.



Re: 070-292 by JaR

JaR
Wed Feb 23 14:29:58 CST 2005

In microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, Neil climbed on a soapbox & opined:

> did you hear "Briscobar" <youcant@sendmespam.com> say in
> news:OU5MCJeGFHA.3472@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>
>> The female offspring, who comes from your loins, she struck my canine by
>> using the terminal portion of one of her lower limbs.
>
> singular pronoun opposite of the first person attempts to confound.
>

The aforementioned personage shall render you incapable of continued
manufacture of hemoglobins by respiration of atmospheric O2. (Negate that
remark! Merely a witty rejoinder!)

--
JaR
Thug 10110
Click on MCNGP.com and never use a preposition to end a sentence with.

Re: 070-292 by Neil

Neil
Wed Feb 23 15:28:50 CST 2005

did you hear "Briscobar" <youcant@sendmespam.com> say in news:
#s4WgReGFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl:

> In news:Xns96069A3CBC550neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16,
> Neil <guess!!!@gmail.com> rambled:
>> did you hear "Briscobar" <youcant@sendmespam.com> say in
>> news:OU5MCJeGFHA.3472@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>>
>>> The female offspring, who comes from your loins, she struck my
>>> canine by using the terminal portion of one of her lower limbs.
>>
>> singular pronoun opposite of the first person attempts to confound.
>
> I presume that you are in posession of the device which attaches papers
> together via a metal clip that belongs to me.
>

The pronoun for the first person reserved the device which attaches
papers together via a metal clip for the Swingline device which attaches
papers together via a metal clip and it's not acceptable because if the
plural pronoun for the second person takes the first person pronoun
possesive device which attaches papers together via a metal clip then
first person pronoun will set the edifice ablaze...

--
Neil MCNGP#30

- 'Bother,' said Pooh, as he saw the mushroom cloud.

Re: 070-292 by Neil

Neil
Wed Feb 23 15:31:53 CST 2005

did you hear Frisbee® <billLASTINIT@dasi-software.com> say in
news:enpmcPeGFHA.2936@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl:

> I WISH YOU GREAT FORTUNE IN YOUR INCARCERATION.

***EXPRESSION OF BOREDOM***

--
Neil MCNGP#30

- Help Wanted: Telepath. You know where to apply.

Re: 070-292 by Neil

Neil
Wed Feb 23 15:31:14 CST 2005

did you hear JaR <plente@spamsuxsofthome.net> say in
news:Xns96067F2866F2Fplentespamsuxsofthom@207.46.248.16:

> In microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, Neil climbed on a soapbox &
> opined:
>
>> did you hear "Briscobar" <youcant@sendmespam.com> say in
>> news:OU5MCJeGFHA.3472@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>>
>>> The female offspring, who comes from your loins, she struck my
>>> canine by using the terminal portion of one of her lower limbs.
>>
>> singular pronoun opposite of the first person attempts to confound.
>>
>
> The aforementioned personage shall render you incapable of continued
> manufacture of hemoglobins by respiration of atmospheric O2. (Negate
> that remark! Merely a witty rejoinder!)
>

Singular pronoun second person malodorous, singular pronoun second person
malodorous, singular pronoun second person malodorous!

--
Neil MCNGP#30

- Darwin was an optimist.

Re: 070-292 by Briscobar

Briscobar
Wed Feb 23 15:34:43 CST 2005

In news:Xns9606A7A9FD31Eneilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16,
Neil <guess!!!@gmail.com> rambled:
> did you hear "Briscobar" <youcant@sendmespam.com> say in news:
> #s4WgReGFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl:
>
>> In news:Xns96069A3CBC550neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16,
>> Neil <guess!!!@gmail.com> rambled:
>>> did you hear "Briscobar" <youcant@sendmespam.com> say in
>>> news:OU5MCJeGFHA.3472@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>>>
>>>> The female offspring, who comes from your loins, she struck my
>>>> canine by using the terminal portion of one of her lower limbs.
>>>
>>> singular pronoun opposite of the first person attempts to confound.
>>
>> I presume that you are in posession of the device which attaches
>> papers together via a metal clip that belongs to me.
>>
>
> The pronoun for the first person reserved the device which attaches
> papers together via a metal clip for the Swingline device which
> attaches papers together via a metal clip and it's not acceptable
> because if the plural pronoun for the second person takes the first
> person pronoun possesive device which attaches papers together via a
> metal clip then first person pronoun will set the edifice ablaze...

Gives me a frickin crazy bad headache reading this.

--

KB - MCNGP "silent thug" #26

Briscobar AT gmail DOT com

A.S.S.F.U.C.K.E.R.S. are not welcome at www.mcngp.com. Unless you email
cheatsheets@mcngp.com first.



Re: 070-292 by Neil

Neil
Wed Feb 23 15:32:33 CST 2005

did you hear "Briscobar" <youcant@sendmespam.com> say in news:
#tn15NeGFHA.4084@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl:

> you silly head

no YOU silly head. me tarzan...

--
Neil MCNGP#30

- I used to be indecisive. Now I'm not so sure.

Re: 070-292 by Neil

Neil
Wed Feb 23 15:46:31 CST 2005

did you hear "Briscobar" <youcant@sendmespam.com> say in
news:OhAXo9eGFHA.3628@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl:

>
> Gives me a frickin crazy bad headache reading this.

cool, my work here is done for another day.

--
Neil MCNGP#30

- Anything you say will be misquoted & used against you.

Re: 070-292 by JaR

JaR
Wed Feb 23 16:06:06 CST 2005

In microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, Neil climbed on a soapbox & opined:

> did you hear Frisbee® <billLASTINIT@dasi-software.com> say in
> news:enpmcPeGFHA.2936@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl:
>
>> I WISH YOU GREAT FORTUNE IN YOUR INCARCERATION.
>
> ***EXPRESSION OF BOREDOM***
>

***TO BE ENCOURAGED TO MARGINALLY GREATER EFFORT***

--
JaR
Thug 10110
Click on MCNGP.com and proceed by rote!
I wouldn't touch the Metric System with a 3.048m pole!

Re: 070-292 by JaR

JaR
Wed Feb 23 16:08:30 CST 2005

In microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, Neil climbed on a soapbox & opined:

> did you hear "Briscobar" <youcant@sendmespam.com> say in news:
> #tn15NeGFHA.4084@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl:
>
>> you silly head
>
> no YOU silly head. me tarzan...
>

no, you not tarzan. you furry one who eat banana...

--
JaR
Thug 10110
Click on MCNGP.com and be a swinger, too!
Eagles may soar, but weasels don't get sucked into jet engines.

Re: 070-292 by Briscobar

Briscobar
Wed Feb 23 16:18:09 CST 2005

In news:Xns9606A7A9FD31Eneilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16,
Neil <guess!!!@gmail.com> rambled:
> did you hear "Briscobar" <youcant@sendmespam.com> say in news:
> #s4WgReGFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl:
>
>> In news:Xns96069A3CBC550neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16,
>> Neil <guess!!!@gmail.com> rambled:
>>> did you hear "Briscobar" <youcant@sendmespam.com> say in
>>> news:OU5MCJeGFHA.3472@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>>>
>>>> The female offspring, who comes from your loins, she struck my
>>>> canine by using the terminal portion of one of her lower limbs.
>>>
>>> singular pronoun opposite of the first person attempts to confound.
>>
>> I presume that you are in posession of the device which attaches
>> papers together via a metal clip that belongs to me.
>>
>
> The pronoun for the first person reserved the device which attaches
> papers together via a metal clip for the Swingline device which
> attaches papers together via a metal clip and it's not acceptable
> because if the plural pronoun for the second person takes the first
> person pronoun possesive device which attaches papers together via a
> metal clip then first person pronoun will set the edifice ablaze...

I inquired about the possibility of the lack of Sodium Chloride! Lack of
Sodium Chloride!

--

KB - MCNGP "silent thug" #26

Briscobar AT gmail DOT com

www.mcngp.com iz off da heezy fo sheezy



Re: 070-292 by JaR

JaR
Wed Feb 23 17:11:49 CST 2005

In microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, Briscobar climbed on a soapbox &
opined:

> In news:Xns9606A7A9FD31Eneilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16,
> Neil <guess!!!@gmail.com> rambled:
>> did you hear "Briscobar" <youcant@sendmespam.com> say in news:
>> #s4WgReGFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl:
>>
>>> In news:Xns96069A3CBC550neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16,
>>> Neil <guess!!!@gmail.com> rambled:
>>>> did you hear "Briscobar" <youcant@sendmespam.com> say in
>>>> news:OU5MCJeGFHA.3472@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>>>>
>>>>> The female offspring, who comes from your loins, she struck my
>>>>> canine by using the terminal portion of one of her lower limbs.
>>>>
>>>> singular pronoun opposite of the first person attempts to confound.
>>>
>>> I presume that you are in posession of the device which attaches
>>> papers together via a metal clip that belongs to me.
>>>
>>
>> The pronoun for the first person reserved the device which attaches
>> papers together via a metal clip for the Swingline device which
>> attaches papers together via a metal clip and it's not acceptable
>> because if the plural pronoun for the second person takes the first
>> person pronoun possesive device which attaches papers together via a
>> metal clip then first person pronoun will set the edifice ablaze...
>
> I inquired about the possibility of the lack of Sodium Chloride! Lack
of
> Sodium Chloride!
>

Oh, woe! I fear greatly the authorities will no doubt conclude that out
extra-legal endeavours shall warrant sentencing to a brutally penetrate
the anus penitentiary!

--
JaR
Thug 10110
Click on MCNGP.com and plead for mercy!

Re: 070-292 by Neil

Neil
Wed Feb 23 19:30:28 CST 2005

did you hear JaR <plente@spamsuxsofthome.net> say in
news:Xns96069A994B255plentespamsuxsofthom@207.46.248.16:

> In microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, Briscobar climbed on a soapbox &
> opined:
>
>> In news:Xns9606A7A9FD31Eneilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16,
>> Neil <guess!!!@gmail.com> rambled:
>>> did you hear "Briscobar" <youcant@sendmespam.com> say in news:
>>> #s4WgReGFHA.580@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl:
>>>
>>>> In news:Xns96069A3CBC550neilmcsegmailcom@207.46.248.16,
>>>> Neil <guess!!!@gmail.com> rambled:
>>>>> did you hear "Briscobar" <youcant@sendmespam.com> say in
>>>>> news:OU5MCJeGFHA.3472@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl:
>>>>>
>>>>>> The female offspring, who comes from your loins, she struck my
>>>>>> canine by using the terminal portion of one of her lower limbs.
>>>>>
>>>>> singular pronoun opposite of the first person attempts to confound.
>>>>
>>>> I presume that you are in posession of the device which attaches
>>>> papers together via a metal clip that belongs to me.
>>>>
>>>
>>> The pronoun for the first person reserved the device which attaches
>>> papers together via a metal clip for the Swingline device which
>>> attaches papers together via a metal clip and it's not acceptable
>>> because if the plural pronoun for the second person takes the first
>>> person pronoun possesive device which attaches papers together via a
>>> metal clip then first person pronoun will set the edifice ablaze...
>>
>> I inquired about the possibility of the lack of Sodium Chloride! Lack
> of
>> Sodium Chloride!
>>
>
> Oh, woe! I fear greatly the authorities will no doubt conclude that out
> extra-legal endeavours shall warrant sentencing to a brutally penetrate
> the anus penitentiary!
>

First person plural pronoun shall necessitate a repositioning of the
singular second person pronoun below into the sub-location known as
"storage B".

--
Neil MCNGP#30

- Power corrupts. Absolute power is kind of neat.

Re: 070-292 by catwalker63

catwalker63
Sat Feb 26 04:56:06 CST 2005

JaR <plente@spamsuxsofthome.net> prattled ceaslessly in
news:Xns96068FDD8D058plentespamsuxsofthom@207.46.248.16:

> In microsoft.public.cert.exam.mcse, Neil climbed on a soapbox & opined:
>
>> did you hear "Briscobar" <youcant@sendmespam.com> say in news:
>> #tn15NeGFHA.4084@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl:
>>
>>> you silly head
>>
>> no YOU silly head. me tarzan...
>>
>
> no, you not tarzan. you furry one who eat banana...
>

Koko?

--
Catwalker
aka Pu$$y Feet
BS, MCP
MCNGP #43
www.mcngp.com

"Eat your cereal with a fork and do your homework in the dark."