SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP

TheMSsForum.com: The Microsoft Software Forum

The MSS Forum ‹ IIS
- Archive
  - Biz
  - MCSE
  - CRM
  - Drivers
  - Framework
  - ADO
  - ASP
  - Compact
  - Forms
  - Dotnet
  - C#
  - VB
  - FontpageGen
  - Excel
  - WorkSheet
  - Exchange
  - Setup
  - Fox
  - Fontpage
  - ASP
  - IIS
  - Entourage
  - Money
  - Messanger
  - PocketPC
  - Powerpoint
  - Project
  - Publisher
  - Excel
  - VB
  - Security
  - Portal
  - Services
  - SQLServerDev
  - SVCS
  - SQLServer
  - VB
  - VC
  - MFC
  - ExcelGen

- Previous
  - 1
    - Simple software to read IIS logs Please can anyone recommend a simple program to interpret IIS logs. I don't want to have to write scripts or code Many thanks Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380840
  - 2
    - MS hotfix 842130 Hi http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=842130 We need to apply this hotfix. Can anyone tell me will the server need a reboot? Article doesn't say one way or the other so I'm guessing not but can I be sure? Cheers Mike Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380839
  - 3
    - Migartion iis 5.0 Hej, is there a tool to migrate IIS 5.0 (Windows 2000) to IIS 6.0 (Windows2003) on another host? IISV5Migration-Utility_x86.exe only migrates to IIS5.0 on another Windows 2000 host Thanks a lot Ruth Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380836
  - 4
    - ASP.NET USER MISSES I I've an installation of 2003 sbs, iis 6 and framework. Now I need to manage security over some files and I can't find ASP.NET Group/User. I've already ran the following command "..\v1.1.4322\aspnet_regiis.exe -i" and return no errors but still no asp.net. Has anyone got any clues? Thanks in advance -- Obrigado! Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380835
  - 5
    - how to get the W3SVC service state how to program with VC to get the W3SVC service state(Running or stop) Thanks -- carson Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380834
  - 6
    - Metabase Backup files Folks, I'm trying to understand how the IIS Metabase backups work. A metabase backup will create two files. "The files that are created are named Name.MD# and Name.SC#, where Name is the name you specify and # is the version number of the backup set, starting with zero (0). If you use the same name for subsequent backups, the version number will be incremented by 1 for each backup set that uses the same name." http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/WindowsServer2003/Library/IIS/475fb247-984d-4c65-842a-ae3bdd3e1080.mspx?mfr=true The when the backup runs the SC file will retain a 'Date Modified' of when IIS was first installed whilst the MD file will have the 'Date Modified' of when the Metabase backup actually ran. What are the purposes of each file? Regards, Tostao Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380833
  - 7
    - fck + upload hi i used fckeditor 2.2 and asp.net i have a problem with upload picture or anything under upload tag i have no problem under image pro tab go to server create new files pictures etc.. and in the upload.html under upload file but i have problem when upload pic under upload tag how can i solve this problem thanks.. Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380832
  - 8
    - FP-webs turn into applications after publishing When publishing a frontpage web with frontpage 2002 to our new Windows 2003-server something strange happens. IIS/FP2002 'upgrades' the folder to an 'application' with it's own dcom component. Our brand new server seems to have problems handeling 500 of these applications and crashes... This problem doesn't occur when publishing with frontpage 98. Question: What can we do to make sure that IIS/FP doesn't make an application of every frontpage web??? I hope anyone can help us. We have been dealing with a very instable server for the past few weeks... Thank you in advance! Greetings, Norbert Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380831
  - 9
    - IIS 5.1 documentation Does anyone know where I can find IIS 5.1 documentation, online or otherwise. I have an MSDN subscription. Thanks for any help. Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380830
  - 10
    - changing iis 5.0 windows service account I tried to change the service startup account from local system to a user account. The server starts but I cant't connect to the webserver using the browser. The user account in the local administrator group and I am running windows XP. Has anyon got any clues? Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380829
  - 11
    - OWA 2003 Password Change I've setup OWA and users can access. Now, I am trying to allow for password changing. The virtual directory is setup and each time anyone attempts to change their password, they get the following message: "Either the password is too short or password uniqueness restrictions have not been met." I checked my policy and it's set for a minimun of 7 characters with nothing special. I can change a password by loging in directly to the network but when trying in OWA I get the above message. Any ideas? Thanks, dD Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380828
  - 12
    - HTML Form not posting IIS6 Just set up a new Win2003Server (installed SP1 as well) with IIS6. Still pretty new to it, and I seem to have a problem I don't understand..... Created two classic .asp pages, one with a <form> and the second to collect and process the submitted info. Nothing I haven't done a thousand times before, but for some reason the Form data doesn't seem to be posting to the second page. Form on first page: <form name="Login" action="page2.asp" method="post"> UserName: <INPUT type="text" id="uname"> Password: <INPUT type="password" id="pword"> <INPUT type="submit" value="Login" id="submit1"> </form> And on the second page, I put: Response.Write Request.Form, which spits out all the form info that was posted, but I get absolutely nothing. Is there some new feature or security setting in IIS6 that prevents/turns off Form posting? I've never seen this behavior before and trying to Google this subject is not giving me any usable answers. Any help is greatly appreciated. -- Andrew Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380824
  - 13
    - Listing Directories with Anonymous Access Disabled I'm running an IIS 5.1 web server at home (Windows XP Pro), and what I was hoping to do is list all of the directories for a web site which have anonymous access disabled. Does any one know of an existing tool which could do this? TIA Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380819
  - 14
    - Any IIS 5.0 export/import tool I have a lot of websites running on IIS 5.0. I'm worried when if my server ever gets corrupted, I would have to set all of the sites again from scratch. I heard that there's a free MS tool for importing and exporting complete IIS 5.0 settings, can someone direct me to the download area for this tool? Thank you. Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380806
  - 15
    - File will not download with IIS 6, even after adding MIME type I'm using Win Server 2003 SP1, and I'm trying to make a file with the extension .sitx downloadable from my site (it's a Stuffit archive format). I've tried adding the MIME type as described in this article: http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;326965 but it still does not work. I added .sitx, and then application/octet-stream. Any ideas? Thanks, Dan Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380803
  - 16
    - In need of a custom devoloped Website for your Company? Every new and or old company needs the services of their very own Website. Apart from DecisionMak software,We would like to introduce ourselves as a Web Design company of professionals who are driven by the philosophy of customer satisfaction through QUALITY and INNOVATION. Our philosophy is to be excellent at the services we provide, by providing a high quality of work, on-time deliverables, and excellent and free customer support. Our Web Design Service is for high quality work for your Website that will always be available for upgrades in case you need in future. Our Web Design Service includes two years free technical support. We will offer full assistance in getting the website running on your server. Our advantages include: 1. You will view your website during all the time when we are making it. We will keep you updated about the progress of your project by hosting it on our web server. Thus you can always view and test your projects progress. This will enable us also to get your timely feedback and thus we will be able to deliver exactly what you need on time! 2. We use the most advanced Roboweb technology. Updating and managing your website will become very easy. Everyone of your company (not only website engineer) can update and manage your website according to your requirement. 3. We will support your website for two years at zero cost. 4. We provide complete documentation on the project at no additional cost 5. We can always negotiate about the price. We are available through our Represenative,Patrik West @ grndrapidsguy@yahoo.com Please contact us via email. DecisionMak Software Corp. Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380801
  - 17
    - possible MDAC issue hanging web servers? Hello, We have a web farm of win2K machines, IIS 5, MDAC 2.6 server 2003 machines, IIS 6.0, MDAC 2.8 all connecting to Oracle DB, using ADO which use ODBC drivers. We use MS ODBC for Oracle and Oracle ODBC. all connect using TCP connections (thru SQLnet) to the DB server. the ODBC drivers use connection pooling. We noticed that sometimes web servers "hang", that is they will not respond to web requests, and then will clear themselves after few seconds to minutes. when opening trace on the oracle client we noticed there is a distinct "break" in the trace file, that is nothing is written for the period we see the server stuck. Microsoft acknowleged a bug in MDAC 2.5 which would cause a web server to "hang", it looks exactly like our problem. is there any chance this same problem exists on these MDACs? is there any fix for MDAC 2.8 SP1 or otherwise? We have turned off connection pooling on half of the servers to see if this solves the issue. can we estimate the impact to performance? Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380797
  - 18
    - Is Welfare Part of Capitalism? This article is dedicated to: A man I met, with most of his body heavily burned, simply because he was a Chinese during the 1998 May Riot in Indonesia. Lots of capitalists that are slaughtered during the cultural evolution. Ten thousands of peaceful smugglers that are massacred in Banda island by the Dutch for conducting peaceful spice trade and all that are similar to them. All minority groups and individuals that face discrimination, even genocide, for economically contributing too much for their society. All customers that have to pay higher products due to protection of tariff and trades. Productive people that are fined with income tax for the victimless crime of making honest money. Smart students that are slowed down so not to move too fast. Industries that do not get subsidy, or even banned to protect unproductive industry and laborers that earn much less due to such restrictions. Poor starving people that could have been rich had their countries choose to embrace free market. Women and males that are trapped in unhappy marriage which they have a hard time getting out. Women and children that have lots of their best choices taken under the pretext of protection. Immigrants and refuges. Is welfare part of capitalism? In short, no. In consensually, punishing the productive through income tax to reward parasitic behavior is the biggest affront against the principle of free market. In fact, from many governments intervention in economy, the one that proponents of free market often oppose the most is welfare. However, when we look further, capitalism and welfare is not really total opposites. Most importantly, properly done, a straight forward welfare program can cause less market distortion, and hence an efficient replacement to buy votes from losers, than farm subsidies, public schools, minimum wage, trades restrictions, tariffs, and sex laws. If it's done by taxing wealth, rather than income, the amount of market distortion can be minimized further. Welfare is also cheap. It'll cost $5000/year to a welfare recipient in USA, for example. However, we need to remember that the recipients' lifestyle worth only $500. The other $4500 goes to implicit welfare due to higher living costs. That implicit welfare includes minimum wage, immigrations laws, and food subsidy, or protections. If somehow a straight forward explicit welfare program can replace all relatively more evil governments' interventions, then capitalists are probably better of not opposing welfare so much. Even Milton Friedman supports schemes called guaranteed minimum income, which is like welfare but with much less market distortion. That's not where the similarity ends. One of the main creeds of capitalism is that consent and competition should be preferred over force. Without that consent, anyone can simply make us choose to make our self worst of under the pretext that it is for our own good. In fact, most laws against consensual acts can be traced down to protection of some disgruntled competitors often done under the pretext of the consenting parties' own good. Anti prostitution and anti polygamy laws, for example, is there to ration females to poor dumb males under the pretext of protecting the consenting women. Of course, all natural resources tend to be rationed somewhat proportional to ones' voting power. And that does explain why democracy and anti polygamy laws go hand in hand too. One man one vote soon leads to one man one wife. Well, at least Matt Ridley agrees with me and he's a well known mainstream scientific researchers. I guess that's also why so many uncompetitive people want to ensure that evolution theory is not taught in school. You can also read a famous psikiatrist book, "The road less traveled," you'll see that life long monogamous marriage is just a trap to prevent highly desirable people from being available to those who they want more, and romance is just the lure to that trap. On the women side, anti pornography laws is really meant to prevent highly desirable women from advertising her assets and hence protecting less pretty women from the higher industry standard a public display of superior desirability might cause. Countries that embrace porn tend to have prettier women. Where did all the unsexy ones go? They're all shifting out of the gene pool, and hence are doing their best to oppose porn preaching religious doctrines that men should judge women based on any features but beauty, which they can't offer. Another issue is consent. Welfare program is not consensual; however, it's relatively more consensual then civil war. In ancient time, when we have different ideological opinions, we end up killing each other to proof who are "right." The Catholic would kill the Gnostic, the Sunni would kill the Shiah. One King would kill the other. A younger prince will argue that the older prince is demon. Might makes right. Such differences of opinions are of course solved with war, which is a very cost inefficient way to know who're "right." However it does work in some subjective practical sense. If we look in the past and try to figure out whether the Gnostic or the Catholic is the one that's heretical or "right" respectively, we need only to see who won. The Gnostics are slaughtered, so they must be the heretic, or do they? At least I bet there are way more people in the world that think that way than the other way around, excluding me actually. It doesn't matter how many books many institutionalized religions burned, how much restrictions of freedom of speech and irrationality they embraced, how many witnesses they snuffed outs and all other techniques that would not have stand the scrutiny of a peer reviewed scientific journal, or even a reasonable jury in the court of law. Too many people don't believe who are right and reasonable, they believe who are mighty. Right or wrong, the win will always become right anyway. Now, under democratic context, we don't kill those who oppose us, rather we try to persuade enough people to join our cause. How do we persuade them? By money of course. Welfare program is then a reasonably cost efficient method to buy votes. When too many people are on a side, we will sort of know that going to war will hurt the other side; hence we comply anyway with the whim of majority avoiding the costly alternatives. While not ideal, this is indeed how right and wrong is really decided, proper assessments of each sides' bargaining position and mutually cherished compromised line of war, plus a bunch of lies covering what's going on to safe each sides' face. No matter how noble the purpose, lies and prejudices lead to misunderstanding, that leads to more war. Hence, the best contribution is simply to unmask all lies. All in all, peaceful democracy is indeed a more cost efficient ways to measure ones' bargaining position. While democracy often lead to decisions opposites of freedom, like popularly supported victimless crime, income tax, and welfare, it's indeed relatively more cost efficient than civil war. That's not when the coherency end. Various natural laws restrict various possible political outcomes. We can't expect a stone will fly to the sky when we drop it as much as we cannot expect a human to be generally unselfish. If we want to kill our enemies, we'll do well dropping a big stone on top of our enemies head rather than dropping the stone on top of our own head expecting the stone to somewhat magically fly to the enemies head. The same way, we can't demand market distortion and expect that the best and brightest among us to still magically be a nice tax payer rather than dictators and corruptors. In a country where selling porn or building a good franchise chain is more difficult and less lucrative than becoming a dictator, guess what the smart would end up doing? Ask Saddam. If we want rich and prosperous countries, we must know that it will and only will happen when we properly align individuals' interests with productivity. Such coherency tends to make certain things come in package with another. We can expect that moving electric field will induce magnetic field. The same way, in life, we observe similar things. Communism and socialism, for example, always come in package with dictatorship and corruptions when smart people realize that being dictators pay more than building a business empire. To the opposite capitalistic countries comes in package with softer deals for losers, such as, guess what, welfare. We know from our economic classes that free market capitalism brings prosperity within market mechanism. However, it turns out that the prosperity that free market brings also profit the less successful beyond market mechanism. Capitalism and the prosperity that come with it tend to facilitate ideological changes in ways that benefit the less successful. One such ideological change is the popular support for losers' benefits. One such benefit is, guess what, welfare. The most obvious samples of such ideological shifts the free market bring are the elimination of slavery in US. What happened? As usual, the northern part of America is an industrial country. At that time, steel industries are relatively more modern than the farming industry. Higher tech industry increase labors' productivity. When labor's productivity goes up, entrepreneurs will want to hire as many workers as possible. Hence, labors' salary will go up. This will kill of industries with less labor's productivity. At the end, the marginal productivity of labors in the least productive industry will go up. That value is labors' salary. Under competitive equilibrium, the more productive and efficient a person is, the more he benefits everyone in the chain of productivity except those similar to him. Hence, an entrepreneurs coming up with ways to improve labors' productivity would benefit everyone, including workers and consumers, at the expense of other entrepreneurs and capitalists. Read that Karl Marx! Then what? When labors' salary goes up, obviously labors will move to the employers that pay them higher. Hence, farm labors in the south want to move to the north. They can't do so legally though because they were slaves. Hence, the northern capitalists in US want to free slaves so they can hire more workers. And then the southern capitalists in US want to keep slavery. This then results in war. The bigger the labors' productivity, the more intensive capitalists have to free slaves. The more supporters there will be on a cause the more likely the cause won. Hence, slaves were freed. Unfortunately, people still want to help losers and buy votes from those who are too expensive and too stubborn to switch. That explains why the farms in US gets subsidy. If losing means not as successful as the other, then there will always be losers. However, we see how free market shifts the worlds' system in ways that benefits the losers too. Unlike the commies' propaganda, capitalism does not cause or even enlarge disparity of wealth. Capitalism only changes the way such disparity are earned to the benefits of all. At the end of the warring states period in China, the king of Chin, Shih Huang Ti, and his prime minister, Li Si were the winner. Within one generation they have all their family slaughtered. If that's what winning means, what did losing means in pre-capitalistic countries? In ancient time, losing meant having all the males slaughtered, enslaved, or castrated and all the females raped and winning means risking your whole family slaughtered by rebels. In socialists countries the rich are corruptors and dictators that slice each other throats while the poor are starving. Now, thanks to the prosperity only free market can bring, losing means they can leave on welfare, with plenty of chance to climb back and proof their worth, like J. K. Rowling. Now, slaves are so free and highly paid thanks to increase in labors' productivity. In fact, when slave jobs are moving to China under globalization, slaves in US refused to be emancipated and want to keep their slave jobs in US rather than evolving into entrepreneurs. So, much for the land of the free and the place of the brave. Some people don't mind dying for what they believe in but are too scared to start a business. Evolutions will fix that I guess. Free market gives abundances to everyone. The benefits the free market brings benefit those less capable from being successful not only within the system but also through non market mechanism, like the ending of slavery and the start of reverse slavery we call welfare. But how do those really work? Is there a general principle? Each of us is greedy and selfish that we want as many as possible for us. Humans' greed and selfishness is an undisputable scientific facts, as sure as the sun rise in the east, as sure as a stone will fall to the ground pulled by gravity. We're not just greedy and selfish. Greed and selfishness doesn't explain all the war, suffering, and poverty we face. In fact, greed is good. Properly aligned, under free market, the greatest among us shall be the one productively providing the best service to the most customers. Blessed be the productive because they'll be rich. This will encourage higher and higher standard of living that we are currently enjoying. Free market allows those who serve more to grow richer. To those who have more profit, to those more capital are given. Even kingdom of heaven don't mind using this nice positive feedback effect. Who needs new deals to break up companies? Also, women prefer the rich. The next time you watch soap opera, make sure it's made in some country with the highest IQ in the world, like Hong Kong. Free sex means richer males will consensually attract and mate with more women producing more kids. That's the whole point of getting rich by the way. Duh? In fact, that's what being a living human male is all about: 1. Gain control ship of as much money or power as possible. 2. Attract or in anyway acquire as many females as possible. 3. Make kids. 4. Use that kids as tools to make grand children. You bet it's right because it's science. Of course, they don't teach this important fact in biology class because government interfere in education. Hence, when we're free, without genocide, without war, even with humanitarians aids given to appease enemies, the meek will indeed inherit the earth. More than greedy and selfish, some humans are simply not humans because they embrace the root of all evil, envy. That explains why we have so many laws against mutually beneficial consensual acts and governments regulations to protect us from our own choices. The truth is, all those laws and restrictions are more often not there to protect stupid people from making mistakes. All such laws are there to prevent the smart from making the right choices. That's why, for example, every body has to move equally slowly in school, to prevent the smart from moving faster. That's why various reproductive techniques are politically incorrect proportional to the expected quality of genetic material that will be duplicated. In particular, life long monogamous marriage, free sex, prostitution, polygamy, and cloning are sequences that both have increasingly expected value of genetic quality outcome and politically incorrectness. In Europe and China, the smart monks are encouraged not to get married. When some minority groups don't buy the bullshit and hence greatly improving their productively earned wealth and genetic quality, such minority groups somehow become victims of genocide. Life is like a real time strategy games. That means when we're not at war, we're in a race. That's simply how we evolve. Morality, religions, and ideologies, are stuffs created by really smart people to persuade us to run backward. Peace means we're in a race. Freedom means we are in a competition. Some people just don't want to compete. Hence, they craft lies and prejudices against those who are in front preventing progress to prosperity. I'll tell you the scientific truth. It's from the fruit we knows the tree. Anyone opposing free trades and globalization is more evil than Hitler or Nazi. If only Japan and German could have acquired natural resources through consensual peaceful trade, Nazism wouldn't have been popular there and Hitler wouldn't have risen to power. With his mass hypnotic skills, he may have ended up as seminar speaker I guess. If only those who had wanted to incite the Second World War see all the miracles and prosperity the free market brings, they would have repented and embrace free market. Yet, after all the prosperity and wealth the free market is bringing to all of us, still many people choose to oppose competition, and hence, miss-properly align our interests from productivity. That is the cause of all evil in the world. All causes opposing free market can be negotiated and appeased. However, if the very thing that a group of people want to prevent is the success of the others, then the situation is pretty much kill or be killed zero sum game. How does such situation usually end up? What would be our optimum solutions for such situation? Under normal circumstances, an optimum solution of any business decisions is a solution where the marginal revenue equals to the marginal costs. Hence, in a zero sum game, each party will try to maximize its benefit to that point. Sometimes, the marginal costs have a spike. There is a certain point where increasing a resources allocation beyond a certain point will create adverse costs. For example, increasing the number of labors will increase revenue. After a certain point, increasing one additional labor will mean buying a new machine or building a new factory. We may end up choosing to do it, we may not. In either case, discretions are the better part of the valor when it comes to that line. The same way, in most countries, each of us can increase our profits using property we own or consensually rent. When we maximize our profit that way, the public will, ideally and some times truly, not interfere, and defend us from being prevented to enjoy our "rights" by others. However, when we start using others' property to maximize our gain, say by stealing, public opinions may shift from protecting us to against us. Hence, the choice whether we should steal or not depends on the extra costs of crossing the politically correctness line of war. If a person sees that the potential gain justifies the increase costs of public support shifts, he'll still steal and make a great career out of it. Otherwise he'll stop stealing while coming up with a pretext to justify his cowardly decisions, such as morality. But what do the people choose their reaction to a specific act like stealing? They do so based on their sense of fairness, justice, and right-wrong discernment. How do people get that sense? From ideology. The ideology, religions, or whatever, then decides the line of war where the rest of us should consider before crossing. But how does the line gets drawn? By estimates of bargaining position. Let's examine an example. Is the King (or Queen?) of England the King of France? Don't know. How do we know? In the beginning, a ruling class from France went to England and become king of England. Then they lost control of France. Hence, king of England wanted to take back the controls they have lost. Well, such conflicts are solved by war. In this particular case, the war lasted 100 years. The British attacked France and successfully route knights with long bows. Then, the Frances stroke back driving the British back to their isolated islands. However, the France cannot move further and go all the way to attack British because of the Strait of Dover separating the two nations. Finally both sides realized that the straits somehow became the sacred line of war. It's not auspicious to cross the line of war for either side. The France, having more army and larger population would beat up the British on land, and the British being stronger at sea can always repulsed France sea invasion. Hence, we got peace. Such natural separators like straits and mountains explain why Europeans are divided into many different countries. The Chinese, not having that natural line of war, end up getting united all the time. Now, let's get back to the question whether welfare is part of capitalism. If all of us have just enough food, and some people don't work, what would we end up doing to those who are not productive? Humans' basic instincts and preferences lead to gene pool survival. When food is scarce, such as when the people demand centralized planning, it would serve ones' gene pool survival to slaughter the parasites rather than sharing food to them. That's because sharing food to those who do not earn it means starving ones own self. In fact, humans will kill each other to literally eat each other when food is scarce. Such is what happened in China and Rusia when centralized planning, governments' intervention in economy, and prejudices against successful capitalists became the norm. However, when food and money are abundance, such as when the people embrace free market, fighting the parasites might cause more gene pool survival lost than feeding them. On the other hand, simply giving and yielding toward threaten will motivate people to keep pushing us around. Moreover, giving in to those who can use force against us will motivate countries to build arms rather than say, better video games. Hence, one possible strategy to minimize open war while still properly aligning ones interest with other individuals around them is to give to those who ask nicely and ask less. As free market brings a lot of abundance, those who are needy can be appeased much more cheaply than those who are envy, and hence, we got welfare program. To be frank, I'd rather see the unproductive people have bigger TV rather than letting them make more kids. It's more humane, and cheaper. Guess what? Most people that know they're not very capable either would rather have that too. Back to the France vs British. If only both sides have realized the true bargaining positions of each, they wouldn't have to resort to such expensive 100 years war right? The thing is, the 100 years war are the most credible and accurate ways to measure ones' bargaining position. War shows which one is stronger, and hence leads to a mutual understanding of where the line of war might be. If only we can wave our gun and scare the enemies, it'll be great. However, the only threats that are credible are those actually done. How do we know a cause's bargaining position? Democracy might give some light by counting the number of those who are in favor or against what we consider lesser evil. However, number counting can be deceiving. We hold this truth with plenty of evidences, that humans are inherently different. We have difference capability and preferences, and hence different choices and outcome. It's useless to lay net in front of anything with wings. Those who are genetically predestined to be successful will get rich anyway whether through honest capitalistic means or through dictatorship. Those who are small in numbers can hence be quite strong. Preventing the smart from making money honestly will then turn them into corruptors and dictators. When the Chileans demand to prosecute their entrepreneurs, they end up getting a dictator, the way any country that demand slavery over freedom deserves. Fortunately, Pinochet are relatively benign compared to others dictator and embrace free market giving the miraculous prosperity that the Chilean now enjoy. Now, US government arrested his daughter for a crime of tax evasion. An act that wouldn't have been a crime if making honest money is free. The miracle of Chili becomes the model of China's moving to free market. It also helps to end communism all over the world peacefully. If capitalists fail to show thanks to Pinochet family, I don't know what would happen to all of us. So, beyond number counting, the more accurate ways are then through skirmishes. When people cross the public's opinion line of war and we don't strike back, the line of war will shift against the coward by precedence. By fighting back, we'll then have a more accurate knowledge of which one the public would agree with. Hence, it's very important to retaliate to what others do to us, either good or bad. It's a pleasure to serve my friends, it's also a pleasure to wipe out envy enemies that are on our ways, should my friends wish or don't mind. When a fraudster tricks my brother over $3,900, my main concern is not to get my money back. My main concern is to get the fraudster to jail even if that will costs far more money than the $3,900. When a thief steals my money on 2001, my concern is also not to get my property back. What's just is to encourage the whole world to post any thieves conviction records on the net to prevent further larcenies. It makes me wonder though. Why people consider it cruel to damage a thief or a fraudster' reputation? The mere acts of making honest money are punishable by income tax. When Everett O. Lasher makes an argument in court, the case leads to $5000 fine, and understandably, a suicide. The mere acts of successfully fending of ones' home from thieves lead to a life long jail term for Tony Martin. Thousands would march against WTO demanding harsh laws to punish those exercising consensual trades. In Iran, the mere acts of switching religions can lead to death penalty. In Indonesia, new laws are being drafted giving years in prison for kissing in public. Of course, public rape during May riot are still far from being punished. This while murderers of Vincent Chin went free without jail term. Thousands would march to end death penalty against murderers. In Indonesia, religious fundamentalists can come to a house and destroy properties from houses providing consensual entertainment with polices watching. Those people often get away or lightly punish. If consensual productive acts are punished while damaging inconsensual forces are not, soon, all highly productive people would end up in gas chamber after the next Cultural Revolution, or what ever. Those who are left are those smart enough to be dictators enslaving the rest of us. Prejudices reminds me of an envy old hag that's so determined to ruin my reputation for being friendly to her and her friends, after her own friendly communication. I never intended to fraud anyone or steal her money yet I got my reputation ruined. I am very disappointed to see that there are people in the world that want to bring me down more than they want to bring down a thief. I have tried to resolve the issue privately by suggesting to that thing that she's really not important enough for anyone to pretend to be her friend. Moreover, I didn't need her as a friend. All this was just a damage-less misunderstanding caused by her own friendly communication which I could simply publicly straighten out. At least, it used to be. However, that vermin really wished to get the issue public telling lies that she never communicated with me, possibly to boost that things' feeling of importance her genes deny her. Well, if she got so mad over a few friendly introductions, I can only wonder what that thing would do when it finds out that her true envy natures are revealed to 55000 newsgroups several times. It'll happen again and again whenever I feel like. Hence, just look for "envy vermin" on the net to find out what's really going on including what she said privatedly. Let the public decide who are more honest, rational, scientific, and straightforward. Let the market decides which one are worthy and who are worthless. It's a great mistake to ever consider such thing as a friend, a mistake no body should do. It's her kind that turns people of from making money productively. Hopefully we can undermine public opinions against all form of envy motivated lies and prejudices. At the end, we'll greatly weaken laws against victimless crime and easily out compete all envy people out of the gene pool. That'll ensure that the free fair market competition would reign over war when all lies and prejudices against those more successful are gone. Now that being said, I want to move all jobs that can be done online to Asia, especially, copy writers. Take advantage of the value difference and leverage like hell is how we all make money in any system. Who's with me? Free market is all merciful and all compassionate. At the end, even those that oppose free market will benefits from free trades. Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380792
  - 19
    - Use ASP to detect if a windows service is running. I am using the following code to detect if a windows service is running. It works on some machines but not on others it returns false even though the service is running. Set objShell = Server.CreateObject("Shell.Application") bIsRunning = objShell.IsServiceRunning("Test") response.write bIsRunning I think it has something to do with IUSR permissions because it works if I put IUSR in the admin group, but I cannot do that permanently. Could somebody please recommend a workaround or what secrity settings IUSR needs to make this work. Thanks Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380788
  - 20
    - IIS6: My deleted default.htm is haunting me!!!! (using IIS 6) Hi, I had a default.htm with a text saying "Hello World". I deleted the default.htm file from the hdd, I uploaded my real asp.net 2.0 solution, deleted the default.htm entry in the Document properties and added default.aspx. But someway the "Hello world" text from the deleted default.htm is still showing when my users types www.mydomain.com. If I type www.mydomain.com/default.aspx, the correct page is showing. I presume it is some kind of cache. How do I fix this problem?? Can I clear the cache? Thank you in advance! M O J O Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380777
  - 21
    - IIS Hangs. RAN IISState and would like the dump looked at I have a Windows 2003 Server with SP1 and Sharepoint Installed. About once a week IIS Hangs Generating no errors in the eventlog. There is a seperate web created using static html and it becomes unavailable as well as sharepoint. Stopping and restarting the iis services doesn't resolve the issue. A Reboot is the only thing to bring iis/sharepoint back up. I have ran IISState the last time this has happened and would love somebody to take a look to see if anything can be found. I haven't found a place to link the dump so if someone would give me an email address I will send it to them. You can email me jwinter@jackhenry.com. Thanks, Jared Winter Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380772
  - 22
    - IIS requires Log In after domain change, clears w/reset & returns We have a very odd thing happening. We migrated to a new domain (actually split our domain into two new domains). Upon doing so, ALL IIS servers seem to require a login to the box, even the external world to our company web site, whether going there internally or externally. However, when we restart IIS the problem goes away and then comes back some hours later. Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380769
  - 23
    - dllhost.exe hanging Hi all, I have been really frustrated with this problem since the last 2 months. We have an ASP application thats running on Windows 2000 SP4 (all security patches up to date), IIS5 and Oracle 9i. Hard ware Load balanced environment with two webservers and a db server. We tried removing the load balancer and tried with only one webserver and db server the problem persists. The problem is that intermittently the dllhost.exe stops responding and does not serve any ASP pages. We have to restart the IIS to get it back. At the time of the non-responsiveness, I tried to write a test page (a single file under the wwwroot folder)to connect to the db and it also failed. I put the same page in a virtual directory but with Low isolation level and it works fine. So the DB Server is good. Only the dllhost.exe is hanging. 1. Oracle 9.2.0.5 Server 2. Oracle 9.2.0.7 client 3. IIS 5 4. MDAC 2.8 SP1 5. Windows 2000 SP4 5. OLEDB for Oracle latest version No information in DB logs, Event Viewer or IIS Logs. The ONLY piece of information that I have is in the logging of our Application. I have this Provider Error. Native Error: -2147418113. Error: 0x8007ffff Any help is greatly appreciated. Thanks, Vijay Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380767
  - 24
    - ASP page not loading... I have moved our sebsite to a new 2003 server & now my asp pages won't work. Where/what do I change to allow asp pages to run? Thanks- Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380766
  - 25
    - IIS5.1 in XP and ASP problem I have IIS5.1 on a Windows XP Pro SP2 machine. The extensions for ASP and asa are missing the DLL files. Like "inetsrvasp.dll" how can I get this back. Would this be on the original CD. I have relinked asp, cer, cdx,asa,htr file extensions to asp.dll that was found in the inetserv folder in system32. If I try removing IIS and reinstalling it, it will not reinstall. Note: The only XP disks I have tried was an XP CD (no SPs no updates) and XP SP2 CD. Both fail to install IIS after uninstalling. If I install XP on a clean test machine IIS will allow ASP. What options do I have to get ASP back on the original machine? Thanks Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380765
- Next
  - 1
    - How can I increase file size for downloading.. Hi, I'm trying to configure a site in IIS 6.0, W2003, but it has big files for been donwloaded.. These are hughes files, How can I increase this size??? I read an article that explain something about it, but still i'm having problem, i'm able to download file less than 80 MB of size, although I put in the machine.comfig 300 000.. Any help would be great. Thanks in advanced. Michel here is the article: By default, ASP.NET only permits files that are 4,096 kilobytes (KB) (or 4MB) or less to be uploaded to the Web server. To upload larger files, you must change the maxRequestLength parameter of the <httpRuntime> section in the Web.config file. Note When the maxRequestLength attribute is set in the Machine.config file and then a request is posted (for example, a file upload) that exceeds the value of maxRequestLength, a custom error page cannot be displayed. By default, ASP.NET only permits files that are 4,096 kilobytes (KB) (or 4 MB) or less to be uploaded to the Web server. To upload larger files, you must change the maxRequestLength parameter of the <httpRuntime> section in the Web.config file. Note When the maxRequestLength attribute is set in the Machine.config file and then a request is posted (for example, a file upload) that exceeds the value of maxRequestLength, a custom error page cannot be displayed. Instead, Microsoft Internet Explorer will display a "Cannot find server or DNS" error message. If you want to change this setting for all of the computer and not just this ASP.NET application, you must modify the Machine.config file. By default, the <httpRuntime> element is set to the following parameters in the Machine.config file: <httpRuntime executionTimeout="90" maxRequestLength="4096" useFullyQualifiedRedirectUrl="false" minFreeThreads="8" minLocalRequestFreeThreads="4" appRequestQueueLimit="100" /> The Machine.config file is located in the \System Root\Microsoft.NET\Framework\Version Number\CONFIG directory instead, Microsoft Internet Explorer will display a "Cannot find server or DNS" error message. If you want to change this setting for all of the computer and not just this ASP.NET application, you must modify the Machine.config file. By default, the <httpRuntime> element is set to the following parameters in the Machine.config file: <httpRuntime executionTimeout="90" maxRequestLength="4096" useFullyQualifiedRedirectUrl="false" minFreeThreads="8" minLocalRequestFreeThreads="4" appRequestQueueLimit="100" /> The Machine.config file is located in the \System Root\Microsoft.NET\Framework\Version Number\CONFIG directory Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380763
  - 2
    - Default Web Sit will not start (red error Icon beside it) Default Web Sit will not start (red error Icon beside it) My IIS was working until I restarted my machine this afternoon. Then it just stopped working When I use the compmgmt.msc \s command I can see the default web site with a red error icon beside it I have tried to re-install it but nothing works. The event error says something about not being able to bind but port 80 is free so there should be nothing wrong there. The microsoft web site has nothing on this. I am running Win XP Pro Can anyone help. Thanks. Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380762
  - 3
    - Ftp server demands password I have recently used the FTP Server available for 2000 pro. I had no trouble and pictures passed from my computer to UK with no bother. I have had to set it up again and have followed the instructions available on http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;300662&sd=tech to the letter for the second time. Using a FTP client on another computer on the net I have noted that the program does start and gets past the user which is anonymous but then says 'need password' and scoots straight past with PASS(hidden) and finishes with not logged in. I have also bothered the neighbour with his computer but I get the same result. The only concession I have allowed this time is to go into the router and set the in and out filters for TCP to allow but that I presume was unneccessary as I did not have to do that first time. I have in my mind blamed a program called FileFolder which is new from MS. However to stop any misgivings, I have re-installed 2000Pro and only brought across the Documents and Settings from the old installation. That is the sum total - if anyone else has the program working, I should like to know how Borge in sunny Perth, Australia Borge in sunny Perth, Australia Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380761
  - 4
    - Dump from IIS State We've been seeing a lot of messages similar to the following in the Event Log: "Faulting application w3wp.exe, version 6.0.3790.1830, faulting module unknown, version 0.0.0.0, fault address 0x006e0065." Here is a dump from IIS State: *********************** Starting new log output IISState version 3.3.1 Mon Apr 03 09:52:36 2006 OS = Windows 2003 Server Executable: w3wp.exe PID = 10900 Note: Thread times are formatted as HH:MM:SS.ms *********************** IIS has crashed... Beginning Analysis DLL (!FunctionName) that failed: Thread ID: 22 System Thread ID: 2fd8 Kernel Time: 0:0:1.15 User Time: 0:0:4.31 Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr WARNING: Frame IP not in any known module. Following frames may be wrong. 00 037cf97c 043feee5 0x5ff083e 01 106afebc 106b009c 0x43feee5 02 0434a7ac 0000002c 0x106b009c Closing open log file C:\iisstate\output\IISState-10900.log Opened log file 'C:\iisstate\output\IISState-10900.log' *********************** Starting new log output IISState version 3.3.1 Mon Apr 03 09:52:36 2006 OS = Windows 2003 Server Executable: w3wp.exe PID = 10900 Note: Thread times are formatted as HH:MM:SS.ms *********************** Thread ID: 0 System Thread ID: f0 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.15 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: HTTP Compression Thread # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0007fc08 7c822124 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 0007fc0c 77e6baa8 ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xc 02 0007fc7c 77e6ba12 kernel32!WaitForSingleObjectEx+0xac 03 0007fc90 5a36467a kernel32!WaitForSingleObject+0x12 04 0007fca0 5a366e63 w3dt!WP_CONTEXT::RunMainThreadLoop+0x10 05 0007fca8 5a3af41d w3dt!UlAtqStartListen+0x2d 06 0007fcb8 5a3bc259 w3core!W3_SERVER::StartListen+0xbd 07 0007ff0c 0100187c w3core!UlW3Start+0x26e 08 0007ff44 01001a23 w3wp!wmain+0x22a 09 0007ffc0 77e523cd w3wp!wmainCRTStartup+0x12b 0a 0007fff0 00000000 kernel32!BaseProcessStart+0x23 Thread ID: 1 System Thread ID: 2668 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.15 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 009eff9c 7c821364 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 009effa0 7c81fe26 ntdll!NtDelayExecution+0xc 02 009effb8 77e66063 ntdll!RtlpTimerThread+0x47 03 009effec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 2 System Thread ID: 2e0 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.78 User Time: 0:0:0.31 Thread Type: HTTP Listener # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 00c8ff24 7c821bf4 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 00c8ff28 77e6611a ntdll!NtRemoveIoCompletion+0xc 02 00c8ff54 5a30249e kernel32!GetQueuedCompletionStatus+0x29 03 00c8ff8c 5a3026bc W3TP!THREAD_POOL_DATA::ThreadPoolThread+0x33 04 00c8ffa0 5a301db9 W3TP!THREAD_POOL_DATA::ThreadPoolThread+0x24 05 00c8ffb8 77e66063 W3TP!THREAD_MANAGER::ThreadManagerThread+0x39 06 00c8ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 3 System Thread ID: e58 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.15 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Type: HTTP Listener # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 00ccff24 7c821bf4 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 00ccff28 77e6611a ntdll!NtRemoveIoCompletion+0xc 02 00ccff54 5a30249e kernel32!GetQueuedCompletionStatus+0x29 03 00ccff8c 5a3026bc W3TP!THREAD_POOL_DATA::ThreadPoolThread+0x33 04 00ccffa0 5a301db9 W3TP!THREAD_POOL_DATA::ThreadPoolThread+0x24 05 00ccffb8 77e66063 W3TP!THREAD_MANAGER::ThreadManagerThread+0x39 06 00ccffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 4 System Thread ID: 247c Kernel Time: 0:0:0.296 User Time: 0:0:0.187 Thread Type: HTTP Listener # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 00d0ff24 7c821bf4 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 00d0ff28 77e6611a ntdll!NtRemoveIoCompletion+0xc 02 00d0ff54 5a30249e kernel32!GetQueuedCompletionStatus+0x29 03 00d0ff8c 5a3026bc W3TP!THREAD_POOL_DATA::ThreadPoolThread+0x33 04 00d0ffa0 5a301db9 W3TP!THREAD_POOL_DATA::ThreadPoolThread+0x24 05 00d0ffb8 77e66063 W3TP!THREAD_MANAGER::ThreadManagerThread+0x39 06 00d0ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 5 System Thread ID: 18cc Kernel Time: 0:0:0.203 User Time: 0:0:0.140 Thread Type: HTTP Listener # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 00d4ff24 7c821bf4 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 00d4ff28 77e6611a ntdll!NtRemoveIoCompletion+0xc 02 00d4ff54 5a30249e kernel32!GetQueuedCompletionStatus+0x29 03 00d4ff8c 5a3026bc W3TP!THREAD_POOL_DATA::ThreadPoolThread+0x33 04 00d4ffa0 5a301db9 W3TP!THREAD_POOL_DATA::ThreadPoolThread+0x24 05 00d4ffb8 77e66063 W3TP!THREAD_MANAGER::ThreadManagerThread+0x39 06 00d4ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 6 System Thread ID: 2958 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 00e0fcec 7c822114 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 00e0fcf0 7c83acfd ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 00e0ffb8 77e66063 ntdll!RtlpWaitThread+0x161 03 00e0ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 7 System Thread ID: c24 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: HTTP Compression Thread # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 017efa84 7c822124 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 017efa88 77e6baa8 ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xc 02 017efaf8 77e6ba12 kernel32!WaitForSingleObjectEx+0xac 03 017efb0c 5a3b8147 kernel32!WaitForSingleObject+0x12 04 017effb8 77e66063 w3core!HTTP_COMPRESSION::CompressionThread+0x126 05 017effec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 8 System Thread ID: 1a0 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0186ff8c 7c821364 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 0186ff90 7c815267 ntdll!NtDelayExecution+0xc 02 0186ffb8 77e66063 ntdll!RtlpIOWorkerThread+0x3f 03 0186ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 9 System Thread ID: 28c0 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: ASP Executing Page: Unable to locate ASP page # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0253ff0c 7c822124 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 0253ff10 77e6baa8 ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xc 02 0253ff80 77e6ba12 kernel32!WaitForSingleObjectEx+0xac 03 0253ff94 709fc91b kernel32!WaitForSingleObject+0x12 04 0253ffb4 709fc8f3 asp!CApplnCleanupMgr::ApplnCleanupDoWork+0x1e 05 0253ffb8 77e66063 asp!CApplnCleanupMgr::ApplnCleanupThread+0xa 06 0253ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 10 System Thread ID: 2a10 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: ASP Executing Page: Unable to locate ASP page # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 027ffe1c 7c822114 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 027ffe20 77e6711b ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 027ffec8 7739cd08 kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x11a 03 027fff24 7738e381 USER32!RealMsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x141 04 027fff40 709fbcbe USER32!MsgWaitForMultipleObjects+0x1f 05 027fff84 77bcb530 asp!CMTACallbackThread::Thread+0x4f 06 027fffb8 77e66063 msvcrt!_endthreadex+0xa3 07 027fffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 11 System Thread ID: 2850 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: ASP Executing Page: Unable to locate ASP page # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0283fe1c 7c822114 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 0283fe20 77e6711b ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 0283fec8 7739cd08 kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x11a 03 0283ff24 7738e381 USER32!RealMsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x141 04 0283ff40 70a018a9 USER32!MsgWaitForMultipleObjects+0x1f 05 0283ff84 77bcb3ca asp!Debugger+0x9e 06 0283ffb8 77e66063 msvcrt!_endthread+0xab 07 0283ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 12 System Thread ID: 282c Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: PDM (Debugger) Thread. # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0288fd80 7c822114 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 0288fd84 77e6711b ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 0288fe2c 7739cd08 kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x11a 03 0288fe88 7738e381 USER32!RealMsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x141 04 0288fea4 54b21868 USER32!MsgWaitForMultipleObjects+0x1f 05 0288ff88 54b31012 pdm+0x1868 06 0288ffb0 54b30fa7 pdm+0x11012 07 0288ffb8 77e66063 pdm+0x10fa7 08 0288ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 13 System Thread ID: f0c Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: ASP Executing Page: Unable to locate ASP page # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0296fef4 7c822124 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 0296fef8 77e6baa8 ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xc 02 0296ff68 77e6ba12 kernel32!WaitForSingleObjectEx+0xac 03 0296ff7c 709fe9b7 kernel32!WaitForSingleObject+0x12 04 0296ffb8 77e66063 asp!CViperReqManager::WatchThread+0x68 05 0296ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 14 System Thread ID: 1774 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Idle ASP thread # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 029cfee8 7c822124 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 029cfeec 77e6baa8 ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xc 02 029cff5c 77e6ba12 kernel32!WaitForSingleObjectEx+0xac 03 029cff70 75bd4bd0 kernel32!WaitForSingleObject+0x12 04 029cff84 77bcb530 comsvcs!CSTAThreadPool::LoadBalanceThreadControlLoop+0x29 05 029cffb8 77e66063 msvcrt!_endthreadex+0xa3 06 029cffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 15 System Thread ID: 2fac Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Idle ASP thread # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 02a0fee0 7c822124 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 02a0fee4 77e6baa8 ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xc 02 02a0ff54 77e6ba12 kernel32!WaitForSingleObjectEx+0xac 03 02a0ff68 75bd464d kernel32!WaitForSingleObject+0x12 04 02a0ff84 77bcb530 comsvcs!CSTAThreadPool::KillThreadControlLoop+0x25 05 02a0ffb8 77e66063 msvcrt!_endthreadex+0xa3 06 02a0ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 16 System Thread ID: 2f94 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.31 User Time: 0:0:0.62 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Idle ASP thread # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 02a4fdcc 7c822114 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 02a4fdd0 77e6711b ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 02a4fe78 7739cd08 kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x11a 03 02a4fed4 7738e381 USER32!RealMsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x141 04 02a4fef0 75bd86c6 USER32!MsgWaitForMultipleObjects+0x1f 05 02a4ff84 77bcb530 comsvcs!CSTAThread::WorkerLoop+0x1e5 06 02a4ffb8 77e66063 msvcrt!_endthreadex+0xa3 07 02a4ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 17 System Thread ID: 2e9c Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.15 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Idle ASP thread # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 02a8fdcc 7c822114 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 02a8fdd0 77e6711b ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 02a8fe78 7739cd08 kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x11a 03 02a8fed4 7738e381 USER32!RealMsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x141 04 02a8fef0 75bd86c6 USER32!MsgWaitForMultipleObjects+0x1f 05 02a8ff84 77bcb530 comsvcs!CSTAThread::WorkerLoop+0x1e5 06 02a8ffb8 77e66063 msvcrt!_endthreadex+0xa3 07 02a8ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 18 System Thread ID: 838 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.109 User Time: 0:0:0.46 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Idle ASP thread # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 02acfdcc 7c822114 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 02acfdd0 77e6711b ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 02acfe78 7739cd08 kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x11a 03 02acfed4 7738e381 USER32!RealMsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x141 04 02acfef0 75bd86c6 USER32!MsgWaitForMultipleObjects+0x1f 05 02acff84 77bcb530 comsvcs!CSTAThread::WorkerLoop+0x1e5 06 02acffb8 77e66063 msvcrt!_endthreadex+0xa3 07 02acffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 19 System Thread ID: 1da8 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.15 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Idle ASP thread # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 02b0fdcc 7c822114 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 02b0fdd0 77e6711b ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 02b0fe78 7739cd08 kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x11a 03 02b0fed4 7738e381 USER32!RealMsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x141 04 02b0fef0 75bd86c6 USER32!MsgWaitForMultipleObjects+0x1f 05 02b0ff84 77bcb530 comsvcs!CSTAThread::WorkerLoop+0x1e5 06 02b0ffb8 77e66063 msvcrt!_endthreadex+0xa3 07 02b0ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 20 System Thread ID: 1cc0 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.15 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Idle ASP thread # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0320fd00 7c822124 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 0320fd04 77e6baa8 ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xc 02 0320fd74 77e6ba12 kernel32!WaitForSingleObjectEx+0xac 03 0320fd88 75bb22b9 kernel32!WaitForSingleObject+0x12 04 0320ffb8 77e66063 comsvcs!PingThread+0xf6 05 0320ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 21 System Thread ID: 640 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 033dff88 7c822114 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 033dff8c 71c6df01 ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 033dffb8 77e66063 NETAPI32!NetbiosWaiter+0x73 03 033dffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 22 System Thread ID: 2fd8 Kernel Time: 0:0:1.15 User Time: 0:0:4.31 Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr WARNING: Frame IP not in any known module. Following frames may be wrong. 00 037cf97c 043feee5 0x5ff083e 01 106afebc 106b009c 0x43feee5 02 0434a7ac 0000002c 0x106b009c Thread ID: 23 System Thread ID: 2c3c Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 038ffe70 7c822114 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 038ffe74 77e6711b ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 038fff1c 77e61075 kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x11a 03 038fff38 79238fd6 kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjects+0x18 04 038fffa0 79238f4d mscorsvr+0x88fd6 05 038fffb0 7923a714 mscorsvr+0x88f4d 06 038fffb8 77e66063 mscorsvr+0x8a714 07 038fffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 24 System Thread ID: 23d0 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.421 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 03b8fefc 7c822124 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 03b8ff00 77e6baa8 ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xc 02 03b8ff70 77e6ba12 kernel32!WaitForSingleObjectEx+0xac 03 03b8ff84 791fe6b0 kernel32!WaitForSingleObject+0x12 04 03b8ffac 792356bf mscorsvr+0x4e6b0 05 03b8ffb8 77e66063 mscorsvr+0x856bf 06 03b8ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 25 System Thread ID: 2a58 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.359 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 03bcfdfc 7c822124 ntdll!KiFastSystemCallRet 01 03bcfe00 77e6baa8 ntdll!NtWaitForSingleObject+0xc 02 03bcfe70 77e6ba12 kernel32!WaitForSingleObjectEx+0xac 03 03bcfe84 791fe6b0 kernel32!WaitForSingleObject+0x12 Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380758
  - 5
    - Application pool recyle timout and hangs I have a problem with my application pool. I've an application running in it's own application pool on a IIS6 on Windows Server 2003. A month ago it started hanging a few times a day and the only thing to do was a IIS reset or a manual application pool recycle. I found a kb explaining that I should change max and minimum threads in machine.config I changed that but no result. I later started to get error messages in the EventViewer saing "A process serving application pool 'XXXXX' exceeded time limits during shut down. The process ID was 'yyyy'. I then tried to raise the value of the shutdown time limit in the application pool from 180 to 360 secunds. That made it work for about a week, but today I had the same problem again. Should I raise the time limit even more? or what's the best way of findig out the real problem behind the shut down? It's a ASP.NET 1.1 application Regards, /Mikael Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380748
  - 6
    - "Service unavailable" error on Windows XP 64 Guys, I'm getting a "Service unavailable" error message when trying to run even a simple ASP application with one file default.asp with <% Response.Write "Test page" %> I've checked the web service extensions dialog and verified that ASP applications are allowed to run. Any ideas would be much appreciated. Cheers Matt Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380740
  - 7
    - IIS sabotages Firefox I'm sorry but I have just been burned with a discovery that IIS gives different HTML output for a .Net page for IE than it does for Firefox. In a test scenario, I have a menu (built as a table) that has a cell wrapped with an asp:Panel web control whose sole purpose is to switch visibility on and off based on permissions. In IE, it is shown as a div tag but in Firefox it is shown as a table tag. Of course, you can all imagine the lessons of pain produced with a table wrapped around a cell but in a tablerow. Needless to say, if I save the source generated by IE and show in the Firefox the static version (produced for IE) shows like it should and not messed up. That is apparently one of several issues with the HTML generation specific to a browser. All of this said and done, I am posting this in an IIS group with hopes that there is some magic switch or registry key that tells IIS - "stop trying to be smart because you're not". This might be an issue for the asp.net group but I decided to start here in hopes of an easy fix. Thanks, Chris Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380739
  - 8
    - Running up services Web Hello What is the step for running up a services web in IIS. Thanks Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380735
  - 9
    - response content type "text/xml, Hi I´m using IIS 5 with ASP NET 2.0. I´ve develop an isapi application. the response content type its text/hml it´s posible chaged to text/xml thanks Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380727
  - 10
    - IIS authentication/404 error Hi, (i'm a IIS newbie, so i hope my question is not a very stupid one) I've installed and configured IIS 5.1 on a XP machine. When i try to open an website from within our intranet it works fine for my user account, on several workstations. When i try the same with other user accounts i get a HTTP 404 Not Found errormessage. My useraccount has exactly the same permissions as the other useraccounts. In IIS anonymous acces is true. Can someone explain to me what's causing this? TIA, hero Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380726
  - 11
    - =?Utf-8?Q?IIS_Logfile:_Filedatum_=C3=A4ndert_si?= Hallo, bitte um Hilfe beim IIS Logfile. Der IIS lÃ¤uft auf Windows 2000 Server und produziert ganz normal ein Logfile, das funktioniert auch, alles was ich drinnen haben will, steht auch drinnen). Das problem ist nur dass ich dieses Logfile automatisch analysieren will. Habe dazu ein Programm in C# geschrieben, das mittels dem FileSystemWatcher auf Ã?nderungen dieser Datei horcht. Leider Ã¤ndern sich Datum und Uhrzeit bei dem Logfile aber nicht, wenn der IIS wieder EintrÃ¤ge dazu schreibt, darum kann mein Programm natÃ¼rlich auch nicht reagieren. Das Logfile unter Windows Server 2003 zb. verhÃ¤lt sich wie ein "richtiges" file. Hat jemand eine Idee woran das liegen kÃ¶nnte, bzw. wie man das unter Windows 2000 Server beheben kann?? THX!!! Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380718
  - 12
    - PHP How do I install php support for IIS? Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380714
  - 13
    - Can only see script for asp.net pages? Hello all! A couple of questions. I am working with a .net application from a third party. When I go the webpage, it's shows me all the html script, and c# code. The HTML pages work fine, and my default web site is fine. I also notices in IIS in httpheader I don't have the asp.net in there, like I have on other computers I work on. I do have 1.1 net framework installed. I am running this IIS on Windows XP SP2. IIS 5.0. Why is it showing scripts, and how do I add that ASP.net in the httpheader? I know the application is fine, I have it running on a windows 2003 with IIS 6.0. TIA!!! Rudy I have another Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380713
  - 14
    - IIS 7 and PHP Hi all, I have trouble to configure PHP 5 (CGI mode) in IIS 7 on Vista 5308... I have the following message in IE when accessing my script: Server Error in 'Default Web Site' Application. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HTTP Error 404.2 - Not Found Description: The ISAPI/CGI configured for this request is not allowed to execute Error Code: 0x800704ec Notification: ExecuteRequestHandler Module: CgiModule Requested URL: http://localhost:80/code/essai.php Physical Path: C:\code\essai.php Logon User: Anonymous Logon Method: Anonymous Handler: PHP -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Server Version Information: Internet Information Services 7.0. I hav add the CGI configuration in the MMC and gave the rights (to phe programm folder and script folder) Ideas anyone? Thx in advance Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380708
  - 15
    - Configuration Problem I'm trying to get IIS 5.1 working on a XP Professional machine. All appears to work fine wil one notable exception. For some bizarre reason, whatever files I want to display on my local server have to be uploaded to two *different* locations -- the default inetpub\wwwroot location and the location that I have specified the files to be. If it makes a difference, I have installed PHP and MySQL on the machine too, but this is the first time I've ever had this problem. Help's appreciated. ------- Clayton Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380703
  - 16
    - Typical access problem with passwords Hello I am trying to reinstall my FTP Server (Windows) on my new system and it is proving as hard as last time. I've checked/done the following 1 FTP publication service is running 2 My dynamic DNS software is running, confirms update and my web site works so the problem is not here. 3 Chosen a folder to allow access to through the FTP/Windows ISS system The problem seems to be with Windows which asks me to log-on but refuses to let me in The folder I want to share has been chosen and the little hand appears under the folder. The authorisations are 'anonymous logon', 'invited Internet', 'invited' and 'everybody' as I wanted to be sure that nothing was blocking here. All these accounts appear in 'security' too so that I was sure again that nothing was causing a problem here (although I understand more or less that all this shouldn't be neccessary) In 'services ISS, I have ticked 'anonymous logon' and chosen an account for anonymous logon to be allocated to (the 'invited internet account) I've also left password blank.(even been in security options to make sure blank passwords are accepted) But when I try to log in, I get a refusal. Since I've gone for the easiest solution first (blank password on invited internet account) , I can't think what is wrong. Can anyone help please? Thanks in advance Dave Neve Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380701
  - 17
    - server 2003 iis6 and authentification hi... i created a website, which is only accessible to the administator group. if i connect to the website via a normal pc, the browser is asking me for a username and a password...all is working fine... now the problem....why is the browser asking me for a username and password, when i start the website on the server itself? i am logged in as an administrator on the server... and if i enter a valid username und password he doesnÂ´t accept it.... i am not able to get into this website :( on an external pc - it works... i need this, because i am starting crone jobs (i have to call a asp website every day via sceduled calls) and there nobody could enter a username :) any suggestions? Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380697
  - 18
    - IIS 5 on an XP machine How can I utilize the FP extensions? I have them installed, but certain none of the FP web components works when put into a web page, like the page counter. I'd appreciate any help I can get. I am using FrontPage 2003, if that makes a difference. -- You think you have problems? Your problems pale in comparison! http://68.233.186.18:8008/images/capetownwaters.jpg Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380692
  - 19
    - Web site configured but not working I have Windows server 2003 edition with IIS installed. I have configured a website with IP address 210.212.82.188. This IP address was provided by our ISP. The site could not be accessed from locations which are outside my office. What are the possible reasons? Can anybody kindly help! -- amrendrapandey ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Posted via http://www.webservertalk.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ View this thread: http://www.webservertalk.com/message1446213.html Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380688
  - 20
    - Can any one help me solve this? I keep getting an error and this is the dump file can any one help me t solve my problem? Analysis Summary Type Description Recommendation Error I aspnet_wp__PID__1696__Date__03_28_2006__Time_12_16_41PM__593__Second_Chance_Exception_C0000005.dm the module C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\aspnet_wp.ex has caused an access violation exception (0xC0000005) when trying t read from memory location 0x000051b8 on thread 0 Please follow up with the vendor of this module, Microsof Corporation, for further assistance with this issue. Information DebugDiag determined that this dump fil (aspnet_wp__PID__1696__Date__03_28_2006__Time_12_16_41PM__593__Second_Chance_Exception_C0000005.dmp is a crash dump and did not perform any hang analysis. If you wish t enable combined crash and hang analysis for crash dumps, edit th IISAnalysis.asp script (located in the DebugDiag\Scripts folder) an set the g_DoCombinedAnalysis constant to True. Analysis Details Table Of Contents aspnet_wp__PID__1696__Date__03_28_2006__Time_12_16_41PM__593__Second_Chance_Exception_C0000005.dmp Faulting Thread Report fo aspnet_wp__PID__1696__Date__03_28_2006__Time_12_16_41PM__593__Second_Chance_Exception_C0000005.dmp Type of Analysis Performed Crash Analysis Machine Name OFFICE Operating System Windows XP Service Pack 2 Number Of Processors 2 Process ID 1696 Process Image C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\aspnet_wp.exe System Up-Time 0 day(s) 14:39:34 Process Up-Time 0 day(s) 00:00:02 Thread 0 - System ID 3872 Entry point aspnet_wp!wmainCRTStartup Create time 3/28/2006 12:16:39 PM Time spent in user mode 0 Days 0:0:0.0 Time spent in kernel mode 0 Days 0:0:0.156 Function Arg 1 Arg 2 Arg 3 Source 51b8 0012ffb4 00bbd19c f72c3d08 aspnet_wp!__security_init_cookie+23 7c816d4f 00084df8 00bbd19c aspnet_wp!wmainCRTStartup+5 00084df8 00bbd19c 7ffd7000 kernel32!BaseProcessStart+23 0040414f 00000000 78746341 I aspnet_wp__PID__1696__Date__03_28_2006__Time_12_16_41PM__593__Second_Chance_Exception_C0000005.dm the module C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\aspnet_wp.ex has caused an access violation exception (0xC0000005) when trying t read from memory location 0x000051b8 on thread 0 Module Information Image Name: C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\aspnet_wp.ex Symbol Type: PDB Base address: 0x00400000 Time Stamp: Fri Sep 23 03:29:18 2005 Checksum: 0x00014235 Comments: Flavor=Retail COM DLL: False Company Name: Microsoft Corporation ISAPIExtension: False File Description: aspnet_wp.exe ISAPIFilter: False File Version: 2.0.50727.42 (RTM.050727-4200) Managed DLL: False Internal Name: aspnet_wp.exe VB DLL: False Legal Copyright: © Microsoft Corporation. All right reserved. Loaded Image Name: aspnet_wp.exe Legal Trademarks: Mapped Image Name: Original filename: aspnet_wp.exe Module name: aspnet_wp Private Build: Single Threaded: False Product Name: Microsoft® .NET Framework Module Size: 32.00 KBytes Product Version: 2.0.50727.42 Symbol File Name: c:\symcache\aspnet_wp.pdb\D0B2B7840D724303AFD1A81818A1B0A61\aspnet_wp.pd Special Build: - JWTec ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted via http://www.webservertalk.co ----------------------------------------------------------------------- View this thread: http://www.webservertalk.com/message1446218.htm Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380686
  - 21
    - iis load balancing I need advice on load balancing two Windows 2003 servers running IIS6. have two web sites one internal and one external facing both of whic connect to a database back end. For security reasons I was going t give these web sites different IP addreses. Both servers have tw network ports. Can anyone offer advice on how to set up network load balancing o them? Jeremy - jbyrn ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Posted via http://www.webservertalk.co ----------------------------------------------------------------------- View this thread: http://www.webservertalk.com/message1447703.htm Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380685
  - 22
    - Server 2003 Discussion groups like this one are very helpful in pinning down problems and solutions. Occasionally, however, a unique topic will be raised that is unrelated and merits a discussion group and forum of its own. To this end I wanted to set up NNTP on my personal computer to handle such occasional topics unrelated. Although I had IIs 5.1 (WinXP Pro) running the NNTP protocol is not included. Rather than use IIS 5.0 (Win2K) I upgraded to Server 2003 IIs 6.0. All I want to do is use the NNTP protocol and possibly a copy of the web page I had running under IIS 5.1. I've seen a reference to a migration tool but since NNTP was not available under IIs 5.1 there is no migration reference. Is there a step by step setup guide for NNTP or what is the simplest way to setup NNTP under Server 2003? Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380684
  - 23
    - frequent frontpage lost connection i have someone who is trying to publish a FP site to a new server. he can log in. and it starts to publish. but then during the publishing process it will frequently stop saying it lost the connection. He usually has to start the publishing process 4-6 times before it finishes. This is a fairly large site, but still i dont understand why it should fail so often. Any ideas? this is a win2k3 std server, iis, latest patches etc Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380682
  - 24
    - ASP not posting data I have created a very simple database collection website with FrontPage 2003 on my XP Pro PC. The site seems to work fine when you enter data into the form. I get the correct results form confirming what I just entered. HOWEVER, the data is never put into the Access database? In Frontpage, the database is validated and it looks good, but it NEVER posts tot he database. If I manually enter data right in the database via Access, I can view that data via my website. Any suggestions, or what am I missing? Regards, Sondra Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380681
  - 25
    - Host Header Hi, Can someone tell me what can I put as a value in the host header value of a web site in IIS 6.0? Our web server is inside the network. Can I put for example ServerName as the value or do I have to put a value like www.WebSite.com? Thank you Jacques Tag: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP Tag: 380675

Hey, this is a real head scratcher.

The following code works as written:

Set objMail = CreateObject("CDONTS.NewMail")
objMail.From = "test@insidedomain.com"
objMail.To = "test@outsidedomain.com"
objMail.Subject = "SMTP TEST"
objMail.Body = "TESTING"
objMail.Send
Set objMail = Nothing

However if I add the the following code after the .To statement:
objMail.CC = "test@insidedomain.com"

What happens is that the mail gets delivered to the .CC address but a
relay error occurs on the .To address.

Once I take out the .CC statement, the .To address gets the delivery.

Any ideas?

Thanks.

Top

Re: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP by Bernard

Bernard
Tue Apr 04 09:27:55 CDT 2006

can you post the complete relay message here?

--
Regards,
Bernard Cheah
http://www.iis-resources.com/
http://www.iiswebcastseries.com/
http://msmvps.com/blogs/bernard/

<harpuafsb@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144157458.188179.81930@j33g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Hey, this is a real head scratcher.
>
> The following code works as written:
>
> Set objMail = CreateObject("CDONTS.NewMail")
> objMail.From = "test@insidedomain.com"
> objMail.To = "test@outsidedomain.com"
> objMail.Subject = "SMTP TEST"
> objMail.Body = "TESTING"
> objMail.Send
> Set objMail = Nothing
>
> However if I add the the following code after the .To statement:
> objMail.CC = "test@insidedomain.com"
>
> What happens is that the mail gets delivered to the .CC address but a
> relay error occurs on the .To address.
>
> Once I take out the .CC statement, the .To address gets the delivery.
>
> Any ideas?
>
> Thanks.
>

Top

Re: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP by harpuafsb

harpuafsb
Tue Apr 04 10:03:24 CDT 2006

Here is the nondeliverable mail bounce back:

Connection to mail.xxxxx.com with Ip Address 10.1.3.11 failed from
mimesweeper.xxxxx.com-10.1.3.11
test@outsidedomain.com
550 Relaying denied to <test@outsidedomain.com>

And the entry in the system32/logfiles/smtpsvc1 log file is:

NDR Thread NDR message
user+test@outsidedomain.com+in+file+filename.eml+was+NDRed+to+file+filename.eml
0

Thanks!

Top

Re: SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP by Bernard

Bernard
Wed Apr 05 04:01:30 CDT 2006

both the .to and .cc is same outside domain?

can you post the smtp log here.... ?

--
Regards,
Bernard Cheah
http://www.iis-resources.com/
http://www.iiswebcastseries.com/
http://msmvps.com/blogs/bernard/

<harpuafsb@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1144163004.439117.19100@u72g2000cwu.googlegroups.com...
> Here is the nondeliverable mail bounce back:
>
> Connection to mail.xxxxx.com with Ip Address 10.1.3.11 failed from
> mimesweeper.xxxxx.com-10.1.3.11
> test@outsidedomain.com
> 550 Relaying denied to <test@outsidedomain.com>
>
> And the entry in the system32/logfiles/smtpsvc1 log file is:
>
> NDR Thread NDR message
> user+test@outsidedomain.com+in+file+filename.eml+was+NDRed+to+file+filename.eml
> 0
>
> Thanks!
>

Top