IIS 4.0 and NT 4.0 - Extremely SLOW
Hi all...
I have a problem. My sites running IIS 4.0 and NT 4.0 were running
great but in the last week, they have slowed right down. They don't
crash but it can take up to 20 seconds to load a page. I've checked
the CPU usage and it's fine. Is there a way that I can start trying to
find out what is wrong?
Any help or advice would be great.
Thanks Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380864
Internal connection fatal error
Hi everybody.
I am experiencing a problem with IIS 5, WebServices and SQL Server 2000. I
have installed a microsoft cluster with Windows 2000 Enterprise Edition. In
the first node I have the IIS 5 installed (Windows 2000 Ent. Ed. SP4). In the
second node, i have SQL Server 2000 Ent. Ed. SP4.
We have some Webservices on node one that access to the dabatabase. Those
webservices writes to a log file some information. I see that many of them
says "Timeout expired. The timeout period elapsed prior to completion of the
operation or the server is not responding." and in some ocasions appears the
message "Internal connection fatal error". I have been searching at Google,
Microsoft, etc. about this problem, but i see nothing concrete.
Please, can anybody help me.
Thanks a lot.... Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380862
SMTP Relay Error using CDONTS and the .CC property in ASP
Hey, this is a real head scratcher.
The following code works as written:
Set objMail = CreateObject("CDONTS.NewMail")
objMail.From = "test@insidedomain.com"
objMail.To = "test@outsidedomain.com"
objMail.Subject = "SMTP TEST"
objMail.Body = "TESTING"
objMail.Send
Set objMail = Nothing
However if I add the the following code after the .To statement:
objMail.CC = "test@insidedomain.com"
What happens is that the mail gets delivered to the .CC address but a
relay error occurs on the .To address.
Once I take out the .CC statement, the .To address gets the delivery.
Any ideas?
Thanks. Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380855
Simple software to read IIS logs
Please can anyone recommend a simple program to interpret IIS logs. I
don't want to have to write scripts or code
Many thanks Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380840
MS hotfix 842130
Hi
http://support.microsoft.com/?kbid=842130
We need to apply this hotfix. Can anyone tell me will the server need a
reboot? Article doesn't say one way or the other so I'm guessing not but can
I be sure?
Cheers
Mike Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380839
Migartion iis 5.0
Hej,
is there a tool to migrate IIS 5.0 (Windows 2000) to IIS 6.0 (Windows2003)
on another host?
IISV5Migration-Utility_x86.exe only migrates to IIS5.0 on another Windows
2000 host
Thanks a lot
Ruth Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380836
ASP.NET USER MISSES
I
I've an installation of 2003 sbs, iis 6 and framework. Now I need to manage
security over some files and I can't find ASP.NET Group/User. I've already
ran the following command "..\v1.1.4322\aspnet_regiis.exe -i" and return no
errors but still no asp.net.
Has anyone got any clues?
Thanks in advance
--
Obrigado! Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380835
how to get the W3SVC service state
how to program with VC to get the W3SVC service state(Running or stop)
Thanks
--
carson Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380834
Metabase Backup files
Folks,
I'm trying to understand how the IIS Metabase backups work. A metabase
backup will create two files.
"The files that are created are named Name.MD# and Name.SC#, where Name
is the name you specify and # is the version number of the backup set,
starting with zero (0). If you use the same name for subsequent
backups, the version number will be incremented by 1 for each backup
set that uses the same name."
http://www.microsoft.com/technet/prodtechnol/WindowsServer2003/Library/IIS/475fb247-984d-4c65-842a-ae3bdd3e1080.mspx?mfr=true
The when the backup runs the SC file will retain a 'Date Modified' of
when IIS was first installed whilst the MD file will have the 'Date
Modified' of when the Metabase backup actually ran.
What are the purposes of each file?
Regards,
Tostao Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380833
fck + upload
hi i used fckeditor 2.2 and asp.net
i have a problem with upload picture or anything under upload tag
i have no problem under image pro tab go to server create new files
pictures etc.. and in the upload.html under upload file
but i have problem when upload pic under upload tag how can i solve
this problem thanks.. Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380832
FP-webs turn into applications after publishing
When publishing a frontpage web with frontpage 2002 to our new Windows
2003-server something strange happens. IIS/FP2002 'upgrades' the folder
to an 'application' with it's own dcom component. Our brand new server
seems to have problems handeling 500 of these applications and
crashes...
This problem doesn't occur when publishing with frontpage 98.
Question:
What can we do to make sure that IIS/FP doesn't make an application of
every frontpage web??? I hope anyone can help us. We have been dealing
with a very instable server for the past few weeks...
Thank you in advance!
Greetings,
Norbert Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380831
IIS 5.1 documentation
Does anyone know where I can find IIS 5.1 documentation, online or
otherwise.
I have an MSDN subscription.
Thanks for any help. Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380830
changing iis 5.0 windows service account
I tried to change the service startup account from local system to a user
account.
The server starts but I cant't connect to the webserver using the browser.
The user account in the local administrator group and I am running windows
XP.
Has anyon got any clues? Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380829
OWA 2003 Password Change
I've setup OWA and users can access. Now, I am trying to allow for password
changing. The virtual directory is setup and each time anyone attempts to
change their password, they get the following message:
"Either the password is too short or password uniqueness restrictions have
not been met."
I checked my policy and it's set for a minimun of 7 characters with nothing
special. I can change a password by loging in directly to the network but
when trying in OWA I get the above message.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
dD Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380828
HTML Form not posting IIS6
Just set up a new Win2003Server (installed SP1 as well) with IIS6. Still
pretty new to it, and I seem to have a problem I don't understand.....
Created two classic .asp pages, one with a <form> and the second to collect
and process the submitted info. Nothing I haven't done a thousand times
before, but for some reason the Form data doesn't seem to be posting to the
second page.
Form on first page:
<form name="Login" action="page2.asp" method="post">
UserName: <INPUT type="text" id="uname">
Password: <INPUT type="password" id="pword">
<INPUT type="submit" value="Login" id="submit1">
</form>
And on the second page, I put: Response.Write Request.Form, which spits out
all the form info that was posted, but I get absolutely nothing.
Is there some new feature or security setting in IIS6 that prevents/turns
off Form posting? I've never seen this behavior before and trying to Google
this subject is not giving me any usable answers. Any help is greatly
appreciated.
-- Andrew Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380824
Listing Directories with Anonymous Access Disabled
I'm running an IIS 5.1 web server at home (Windows XP Pro), and what I was
hoping to do is list all of the directories for a web site which have
anonymous access disabled.
Does any one know of an existing tool which could do this?
TIA Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380819
Any IIS 5.0 export/import tool
I have a lot of websites running on IIS 5.0. I'm worried when if my server
ever gets corrupted, I would have to set all of the sites again from
scratch. I heard that there's a free MS tool for importing and exporting
complete IIS 5.0 settings, can someone direct me to the download area for
this tool?
Thank you. Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380806
File will not download with IIS 6, even after adding MIME type
I'm using Win Server 2003 SP1, and I'm trying to make a file with the
extension .sitx downloadable from my site (it's a Stuffit archive
format).
I've tried adding the MIME type as described in this article:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;326965
but it still does not work. I added .sitx, and then
application/octet-stream.
Any ideas?
Thanks,
Dan Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380803
In need of a custom devoloped Website for your Company?
Every new and or old company needs the services of their very own
Website.
Apart from DecisionMak software,We would like to introduce ourselves as
a
Web Design company of professionals who are driven by the philosophy of
customer satisfaction through QUALITY and INNOVATION. Our philosophy is
to be excellent at the services we provide, by providing a high quality
of work, on-time deliverables, and excellent and free customer support.
Our Web Design Service is for high quality work for your Website that
will always be available for upgrades in case you need in future. Our
Web Design Service includes two years free technical support. We will
offer full assistance in getting the website running on your server.
Our advantages include:
1. You will view your website during all the time when we are making
it. We will keep you updated about the progress of your project by
hosting it on our web server. Thus you can always view and test your
projects progress. This will enable us also to get your timely feedback
and thus we will be able to deliver exactly what you need on time!
2. We use the most advanced Roboweb technology. Updating and managing
your website will become very easy. Everyone of your company (not only
website engineer) can update and manage your website according to your
requirement.
3. We will support your website for two years at zero cost.
4. We provide complete documentation on the project at no additional
cost
5. We can always negotiate about the price.
We are available through our Represenative,Patrik West @
grndrapidsguy@yahoo.com
Please contact us via email.
DecisionMak Software Corp. Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380801
possible MDAC issue hanging web servers?
Hello,
We have a web farm of
win2K machines, IIS 5, MDAC 2.6
server 2003 machines, IIS 6.0, MDAC 2.8
all connecting to Oracle DB, using ADO which use ODBC drivers. We use
MS ODBC for Oracle and Oracle ODBC. all connect using TCP connections
(thru SQLnet) to the DB server. the ODBC drivers use connection
pooling.
We noticed that sometimes web servers "hang", that is they will not
respond to web requests, and then will clear themselves after few
seconds to minutes.
when opening trace on the oracle client we noticed there is a distinct
"break" in the trace file, that is nothing is written for the period we
see the server stuck.
Microsoft acknowleged a bug in MDAC 2.5 which would cause a web server
to "hang", it looks exactly like our problem. is there any chance this
same problem exists on these MDACs? is there any fix for MDAC 2.8 SP1
or otherwise?
We have turned off connection pooling on half of the servers to see if
this solves the issue. can we estimate the impact to performance? Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380797
Is Welfare Part of Capitalism?
This article is dedicated to:
A man I met, with most of his body heavily burned, simply because he
was a Chinese during the 1998 May Riot in Indonesia.
Lots of capitalists that are slaughtered during the cultural evolution.
Ten thousands of peaceful smugglers that are massacred in Banda island
by the Dutch for conducting peaceful spice trade and all that are
similar to them.
All minority groups and individuals that face discrimination, even
genocide, for economically contributing too much for their society.
All customers that have to pay higher products due to protection of
tariff and trades.
Productive people that are fined with income tax for the victimless
crime of making honest money.
Smart students that are slowed down so not to move too fast.
Industries that do not get subsidy, or even banned to protect
unproductive industry and laborers that earn much less due to such
restrictions.
Poor starving people that could have been rich had their countries
choose to embrace free market.
Women and males that are trapped in unhappy marriage which they have a
hard time getting out.
Women and children that have lots of their best choices taken under the
pretext of protection.
Immigrants and refuges.
Is welfare part of capitalism?
In short, no. In consensually, punishing the productive through income
tax to reward parasitic behavior is the biggest affront against the
principle of free market. In fact, from many governments intervention
in economy, the one that proponents of free market often oppose the
most is welfare.
However, when we look further, capitalism and welfare is not really
total opposites. Most importantly, properly done, a straight forward
welfare program can cause less market distortion, and hence an
efficient replacement to buy votes from losers, than farm subsidies,
public schools, minimum wage, trades restrictions, tariffs, and sex
laws. If it's done by taxing wealth, rather than income, the amount of
market distortion can be minimized further.
Welfare is also cheap. It'll cost $5000/year to a welfare recipient
in USA, for example. However, we need to remember that the
recipients' lifestyle worth only $500. The other $4500 goes to
implicit welfare due to higher living costs. That implicit welfare
includes minimum wage, immigrations laws, and food subsidy, or
protections.
If somehow a straight forward explicit welfare program can replace all
relatively more evil governments' interventions, then capitalists are
probably better of not opposing welfare so much. Even Milton Friedman
supports schemes called guaranteed minimum income, which is like
welfare but with much less market distortion.
That's not where the similarity ends. One of the main creeds of
capitalism is that consent and competition should be preferred over
force. Without that consent, anyone can simply make us choose to make
our self worst of under the pretext that it is for our own good. In
fact, most laws against consensual acts can be traced down to
protection of some disgruntled competitors often done under the pretext
of the consenting parties' own good.
Anti prostitution and anti polygamy laws, for example, is there to
ration females to poor dumb males under the pretext of protecting the
consenting women. Of course, all natural resources tend to be rationed
somewhat proportional to ones' voting power. And that does explain
why democracy and anti polygamy laws go hand in hand too. One man one
vote soon leads to one man one wife.
Well, at least Matt Ridley agrees with me and he's a well known
mainstream scientific researchers. I guess that's also why so many
uncompetitive people want to ensure that evolution theory is not taught
in school. You can also read a famous psikiatrist book, "The road less
traveled," you'll see that life long monogamous marriage is just a trap
to prevent highly desirable people from being available to those who
they want more, and romance is just the lure to that trap.
On the women side, anti pornography laws is really meant to prevent
highly desirable women from advertising her assets and hence protecting
less pretty women from the higher industry standard a public display of
superior desirability might cause. Countries that embrace porn tend to
have prettier women. Where did all the unsexy ones go? They're all
shifting out of the gene pool, and hence are doing their best to oppose
porn preaching religious doctrines that men should judge women based on
any features but beauty, which they can't offer.
Another issue is consent. Welfare program is not consensual; however,
it's relatively more consensual then civil war. In ancient time, when
we have different ideological opinions, we end up killing each other to
proof who are "right." The Catholic would kill the Gnostic, the
Sunni would kill the Shiah. One King would kill the other. A younger
prince will argue that the older prince is demon. Might makes right.
Such differences of opinions are of course solved with war, which is a
very cost inefficient way to know who're "right." However it does
work in some subjective practical sense. If we look in the past and try
to figure out whether the Gnostic or the Catholic is the one that's
heretical or "right" respectively, we need only to see who won. The
Gnostics are slaughtered, so they must be the heretic, or do they? At
least I bet there are way more people in the world that think that way
than the other way around, excluding me actually.
It doesn't matter how many books many institutionalized religions
burned, how much restrictions of freedom of speech and irrationality
they embraced, how many witnesses they snuffed outs and all other
techniques that would not have stand the scrutiny of a peer reviewed
scientific journal, or even a reasonable jury in the court of law. Too
many people don't believe who are right and reasonable, they believe
who are mighty. Right or wrong, the win will always become right
anyway.
Now, under democratic context, we don't kill those who oppose us,
rather we try to persuade enough people to join our cause. How do we
persuade them? By money of course. Welfare program is then a reasonably
cost efficient method to buy votes.
When too many people are on a side, we will sort of know that going to
war will hurt the other side; hence we comply anyway with the whim of
majority avoiding the costly alternatives. While not ideal, this is
indeed how right and wrong is really decided, proper assessments of
each sides' bargaining position and mutually cherished compromised line
of war, plus a bunch of lies covering what's going on to safe each
sides' face.
No matter how noble the purpose, lies and prejudices lead to
misunderstanding, that leads to more war. Hence, the best contribution
is simply to unmask all lies.
All in all, peaceful democracy is indeed a more cost efficient ways to
measure ones' bargaining position. While democracy often lead to
decisions opposites of freedom, like popularly supported victimless
crime, income tax, and welfare, it's indeed relatively more cost
efficient than civil war.
That's not when the coherency end. Various natural laws restrict
various possible political outcomes. We can't expect a stone will fly
to the sky when we drop it as much as we cannot expect a human to be
generally unselfish. If we want to kill our enemies, we'll do well
dropping a big stone on top of our enemies head rather than dropping
the stone on top of our own head expecting the stone to somewhat
magically fly to the enemies head.
The same way, we can't demand market distortion and expect that the
best and brightest among us to still magically be a nice tax payer
rather than dictators and corruptors. In a country where selling porn
or building a good franchise chain is more difficult and less lucrative
than becoming a dictator, guess what the smart would end up doing? Ask
Saddam.
If we want rich and prosperous countries, we must know that it will and
only will happen when we properly align individuals' interests with
productivity.
Such coherency tends to make certain things come in package with
another. We can expect that moving electric field will induce magnetic
field. The same way, in life, we observe similar things. Communism and
socialism, for example, always come in package with dictatorship and
corruptions when smart people realize that being dictators pay more
than building a business empire.
To the opposite capitalistic countries comes in package with softer
deals for losers, such as, guess what, welfare.
We know from our economic classes that free market capitalism brings
prosperity within market mechanism. However, it turns out that the
prosperity that free market brings also profit the less successful
beyond market mechanism. Capitalism and the prosperity that come with
it tend to facilitate ideological changes in ways that benefit the less
successful. One such ideological change is the popular support for
losers' benefits. One such benefit is, guess what, welfare.
The most obvious samples of such ideological shifts the free market
bring are the elimination of slavery in US. What happened? As usual,
the northern part of America is an industrial country. At that time,
steel industries are relatively more modern than the farming industry.
Higher tech industry increase labors' productivity. When labor's
productivity goes up, entrepreneurs will want to hire as many workers
as possible. Hence, labors' salary will go up. This will kill of
industries with less labor's productivity. At the end, the marginal
productivity of labors in the least productive industry will go up.
That value is labors' salary.
Under competitive equilibrium, the more productive and efficient a
person is, the more he benefits everyone in the chain of productivity
except those similar to him. Hence, an entrepreneurs coming up with
ways to improve labors' productivity would benefit everyone,
including workers and consumers, at the expense of other entrepreneurs
and capitalists. Read that Karl Marx!
Then what? When labors' salary goes up, obviously labors will move to
the employers that pay them higher. Hence, farm labors in the south
want to move to the north. They can't do so legally though because
they were slaves. Hence, the northern capitalists in US want to free
slaves so they can hire more workers. And then the southern capitalists
in US want to keep slavery. This then results in war. The bigger the
labors' productivity, the more intensive capitalists have to free
slaves. The more supporters there will be on a cause the more likely
the cause won. Hence, slaves were freed.
Unfortunately, people still want to help losers and buy votes from
those who are too expensive and too stubborn to switch. That explains
why the farms in US gets subsidy.
If losing means not as successful as the other, then there will always
be losers. However, we see how free market shifts the worlds' system
in ways that benefits the losers too. Unlike the commies' propaganda,
capitalism does not cause or even enlarge disparity of wealth.
Capitalism only changes the way such disparity are earned to the
benefits of all.
At the end of the warring states period in China, the king of Chin,
Shih Huang Ti, and his prime minister, Li Si were the winner. Within
one generation they have all their family slaughtered. If that's what
winning means, what did losing means in pre-capitalistic countries? In
ancient time, losing meant having all the males slaughtered, enslaved,
or castrated and all the females raped and winning means risking your
whole family slaughtered by rebels. In socialists countries the rich
are corruptors and dictators that slice each other throats while the
poor are starving.
Now, thanks to the prosperity only free market can bring, losing means
they can leave on welfare, with plenty of chance to climb back and
proof their worth, like J. K. Rowling. Now, slaves are so free and
highly paid thanks to increase in labors' productivity. In fact, when
slave jobs are moving to China under globalization, slaves in US
refused to be emancipated and want to keep their slave jobs in US
rather than evolving into entrepreneurs. So, much for the land of the
free and the place of the brave. Some people don't mind dying for
what they believe in but are too scared to start a business. Evolutions
will fix that I guess.
Free market gives abundances to everyone. The benefits the free market
brings benefit those less capable from being successful not only within
the system but also through non market mechanism, like the ending of
slavery and the start of reverse slavery we call welfare. But how do
those really work? Is there a general principle?
Each of us is greedy and selfish that we want as many as possible for
us. Humans' greed and selfishness is an undisputable scientific
facts, as sure as the sun rise in the east, as sure as a stone will
fall to the ground pulled by gravity. We're not just greedy and
selfish. Greed and selfishness doesn't explain all the war,
suffering, and poverty we face.
In fact, greed is good. Properly aligned, under free market, the
greatest among us shall be the one productively providing the best
service to the most customers. Blessed be the productive because
they'll be rich. This will encourage higher and higher standard of
living that we are currently enjoying.
Free market allows those who serve more to grow richer. To those who
have more profit, to those more capital are given. Even kingdom of
heaven don't mind using this nice positive feedback effect. Who needs
new deals to break up companies?
Also, women prefer the rich. The next time you watch soap opera, make
sure it's made in some country with the highest IQ in the world, like
Hong Kong.
Free sex means richer males will consensually attract and mate with
more women producing more kids. That's the whole point of getting
rich by the way. Duh?
In fact, that's what being a living human male is all about:
1. Gain control ship of as much money or power as possible.
2. Attract or in anyway acquire as many females as possible.
3. Make kids.
4. Use that kids as tools to make grand children.
You bet it's right because it's science. Of course, they don't teach
this important fact in biology class because government interfere in
education.
Hence, when we're free, without genocide, without war, even with
humanitarians aids given to appease enemies, the meek will indeed
inherit the earth.
More than greedy and selfish, some humans are simply not humans because
they embrace the root of all evil, envy. That explains why we have so
many laws against mutually beneficial consensual acts and governments
regulations to protect us from our own choices. The truth is, all those
laws and restrictions are more often not there to protect stupid people
from making mistakes. All such laws are there to prevent the smart from
making the right choices.
That's why, for example, every body has to move equally slowly in
school, to prevent the smart from moving faster. That's why various
reproductive techniques are politically incorrect proportional to the
expected quality of genetic material that will be duplicated. In
particular, life long monogamous marriage, free sex, prostitution,
polygamy, and cloning are sequences that both have increasingly
expected value of genetic quality outcome and politically
incorrectness.
In Europe and China, the smart monks are encouraged not to get married.
When some minority groups don't buy the bullshit and hence greatly
improving their productively earned wealth and genetic quality, such
minority groups somehow become victims of genocide.
Life is like a real time strategy games. That means when we're not at
war, we're in a race. That's simply how we evolve. Morality,
religions, and ideologies, are stuffs created by really smart people to
persuade us to run backward.
Peace means we're in a race. Freedom means we are in a competition.
Some people just don't want to compete. Hence, they craft lies and
prejudices against those who are in front preventing progress to
prosperity.
I'll tell you the scientific truth. It's from the fruit we knows
the tree. Anyone opposing free trades and globalization is more evil
than Hitler or Nazi. If only Japan and German could have acquired
natural resources through consensual peaceful trade, Nazism wouldn't
have been popular there and Hitler wouldn't have risen to power. With
his mass hypnotic skills, he may have ended up as seminar speaker I
guess.
If only those who had wanted to incite the Second World War see all the
miracles and prosperity the free market brings, they would have
repented and embrace free market. Yet, after all the prosperity and
wealth the free market is bringing to all of us, still many people
choose to oppose competition, and hence, miss-properly align our
interests from productivity. That is the cause of all evil in the
world.
All causes opposing free market can be negotiated and appeased.
However, if the very thing that a group of people want to prevent is
the success of the others, then the situation is pretty much kill or be
killed zero sum game.
How does such situation usually end up? What would be our optimum
solutions for such situation?
Under normal circumstances, an optimum solution of any business
decisions is a solution where the marginal revenue equals to the
marginal costs. Hence, in a zero sum game, each party will try to
maximize its benefit to that point. Sometimes, the marginal costs have
a spike. There is a certain point where increasing a resources
allocation beyond a certain point will create adverse costs. For
example, increasing the number of labors will increase revenue.
After a certain point, increasing one additional labor will mean buying
a new machine or building a new factory. We may end up choosing to do
it, we may not. In either case, discretions are the better part of the
valor when it comes to that line.
The same way, in most countries, each of us can increase our profits
using property we own or consensually rent. When we maximize our profit
that way, the public will, ideally and some times truly, not interfere,
and defend us from being prevented to enjoy our "rights" by others.
However, when we start using others' property to maximize our gain,
say by stealing, public opinions may shift from protecting us to
against us.
Hence, the choice whether we should steal or not depends on the extra
costs of crossing the politically correctness line of war. If a person
sees that the potential gain justifies the increase costs of public
support shifts, he'll still steal and make a great career out of it.
Otherwise he'll stop stealing while coming up with a pretext to
justify his cowardly decisions, such as morality.
But what do the people choose their reaction to a specific act like
stealing? They do so based on their sense of fairness, justice, and
right-wrong discernment. How do people get that sense? From ideology.
The ideology, religions, or whatever, then decides the line of war
where the rest of us should consider before crossing. But how does the
line gets drawn? By estimates of bargaining position.
Let's examine an example. Is the King (or Queen?) of England the King
of France? Don't know. How do we know? In the beginning, a ruling
class from France went to England and become king of England. Then they
lost control of France. Hence, king of England wanted to take back the
controls they have lost. Well, such conflicts are solved by war. In
this particular case, the war lasted 100 years.
The British attacked France and successfully route knights with long
bows. Then, the Frances stroke back driving the British back to their
isolated islands. However, the France cannot move further and go all
the way to attack British because of the Strait of Dover separating the
two nations. Finally both sides realized that the straits somehow
became the sacred line of war. It's not auspicious to cross the line
of war for either side. The France, having more army and larger
population would beat up the British on land, and the British being
stronger at sea can always repulsed France sea invasion. Hence, we got
peace.
Such natural separators like straits and mountains explain why
Europeans are divided into many different countries. The Chinese, not
having that natural line of war, end up getting united all the time.
Now, let's get back to the question whether welfare is part of
capitalism. If all of us have just enough food, and some people don't
work, what would we end up doing to those who are not productive?
Humans' basic instincts and preferences lead to gene pool survival.
When food is scarce, such as when the people demand centralized
planning, it would serve ones' gene pool survival to slaughter the
parasites rather than sharing food to them. That's because sharing
food to those who do not earn it means starving ones own self. In fact,
humans will kill each other to literally eat each other when food is
scarce. Such is what happened in China and Rusia when centralized
planning, governments' intervention in economy, and prejudices
against successful capitalists became the norm.
However, when food and money are abundance, such as when the people
embrace free market, fighting the parasites might cause more gene pool
survival lost than feeding them. On the other hand, simply giving and
yielding toward threaten will motivate people to keep pushing us
around. Moreover, giving in to those who can use force against us will
motivate countries to build arms rather than say, better video games.
Hence, one possible strategy to minimize open war while still properly
aligning ones interest with other individuals around them is to give to
those who ask nicely and ask less. As free market brings a lot of
abundance, those who are needy can be appeased much more cheaply than
those who are envy, and hence, we got welfare program.
To be frank, I'd rather see the unproductive people have bigger TV
rather than letting them make more kids. It's more humane, and
cheaper. Guess what? Most people that know they're not very capable
either would rather have that too.
Back to the France vs British. If only both sides have realized the
true bargaining positions of each, they wouldn't have to resort to
such expensive 100 years war right? The thing is, the 100 years war are
the most credible and accurate ways to measure ones' bargaining
position. War shows which one is stronger, and hence leads to a mutual
understanding of where the line of war might be.
If only we can wave our gun and scare the enemies, it'll be great.
However, the only threats that are credible are those actually done.
How do we know a cause's bargaining position? Democracy might give
some light by counting the number of those who are in favor or against
what we consider lesser evil. However, number counting can be
deceiving. We hold this truth with plenty of evidences, that humans are
inherently different.
We have difference capability and preferences, and hence different
choices and outcome. It's useless to lay net in front of anything
with wings. Those who are genetically predestined to be successful will
get rich anyway whether through honest capitalistic means or through
dictatorship.
Those who are small in numbers can hence be quite strong. Preventing
the smart from making money honestly will then turn them into
corruptors and dictators. When the Chileans demand to prosecute their
entrepreneurs, they end up getting a dictator, the way any country that
demand slavery over freedom deserves. Fortunately, Pinochet are
relatively benign compared to others dictator and embrace free market
giving the miraculous prosperity that the Chilean now enjoy.
Now, US government arrested his daughter for a crime of tax evasion. An
act that wouldn't have been a crime if making honest money is free.
The miracle of Chili becomes the model of China's moving to free
market. It also helps to end communism all over the world peacefully.
If capitalists fail to show thanks to Pinochet family, I don't know
what would happen to all of us.
So, beyond number counting, the more accurate ways are then through
skirmishes. When people cross the public's opinion line of war and we
don't strike back, the line of war will shift against the coward by
precedence. By fighting back, we'll then have a more accurate
knowledge of which one the public would agree with.
Hence, it's very important to retaliate to what others do to us,
either good or bad. It's a pleasure to serve my friends, it's also
a pleasure to wipe out envy enemies that are on our ways, should my
friends wish or don't mind.
When a fraudster tricks my brother over $3,900, my main concern is not
to get my money back. My main concern is to get the fraudster to jail
even if that will costs far more money than the $3,900. When a thief
steals my money on 2001, my concern is also not to get my property
back. What's just is to encourage the whole world to post any thieves
conviction records on the net to prevent further larcenies.
It makes me wonder though. Why people consider it cruel to damage a
thief or a fraudster' reputation? The mere acts of making honest
money are punishable by income tax. When Everett O. Lasher makes an
argument in court, the case leads to $5000 fine, and understandably, a
suicide. The mere acts of successfully fending of ones' home from
thieves lead to a life long jail term for Tony Martin. Thousands would
march against WTO demanding harsh laws to punish those exercising
consensual trades. In Iran, the mere acts of switching religions can
lead to death penalty.
In Indonesia, new laws are being drafted giving years in prison for
kissing in public. Of course, public rape during May riot are still far
from being punished.
This while murderers of Vincent Chin went free without jail term.
Thousands would march to end death penalty against murderers. In
Indonesia, religious fundamentalists can come to a house and destroy
properties from houses providing consensual entertainment with polices
watching. Those people often get away or lightly punish.
If consensual productive acts are punished while damaging inconsensual
forces are not, soon, all highly productive people would end up in gas
chamber after the next Cultural Revolution, or what ever. Those who are
left are those smart enough to be dictators enslaving the rest of us.
Prejudices reminds me of an envy old hag that's so determined to ruin
my reputation for being friendly to her and her friends, after her own
friendly communication. I never intended to fraud anyone or steal her
money yet I got my reputation ruined. I am very disappointed to see
that there are people in the world that want to bring me down more than
they want to bring down a thief.
I have tried to resolve the issue privately by suggesting to that thing
that she's really not important enough for anyone to pretend to be her
friend. Moreover, I didn't need her as a friend. All this was just a
damage-less misunderstanding caused by her own friendly communication
which I could simply publicly straighten out. At least, it used to be.
However, that vermin really wished to get the issue public telling lies
that she never communicated with me, possibly to boost that things'
feeling of importance her genes deny her. Well, if she got so mad over
a few friendly introductions, I can only wonder what that thing would
do when it finds out that her true envy natures are revealed to 55000
newsgroups several times. It'll happen again and again whenever I
feel like.
Hence, just look for "envy vermin" on the net to find out what's
really going on including what she said privatedly. Let the public
decide who are more honest, rational, scientific, and straightforward.
Let the market decides which one are worthy and who are worthless.
It's a great mistake to ever consider such thing as a friend, a
mistake no body should do. It's her kind that turns people of from
making money productively.
Hopefully we can undermine public opinions against all form of envy
motivated lies and prejudices. At the end, we'll greatly weaken laws
against victimless crime and easily out compete all envy people out of
the gene pool. That'll ensure that the free fair market competition
would reign over war when all lies and prejudices against those more
successful are gone.
Now that being said, I want to move all jobs that can be done online to
Asia, especially, copy writers. Take advantage of the value difference
and leverage like hell is how we all make money in any system. Who's
with me?
Free market is all merciful and all compassionate. At the end, even
those that oppose free market will benefits from free trades. Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380792
Use ASP to detect if a windows service is running.
I am using the following code to detect if a windows service is
running. It works on some machines but not on others it returns false
even though the service is running.
Set objShell = Server.CreateObject("Shell.Application")
bIsRunning = objShell.IsServiceRunning("Test")
response.write bIsRunning
I think it has something to do with IUSR permissions because it works
if I put IUSR in the admin group, but I cannot do that permanently.
Could somebody please recommend a workaround or what secrity settings
IUSR needs to make this work.
Thanks Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380788
IIS6: My deleted default.htm is haunting me!!!!
(using IIS 6)
Hi,
I had a default.htm with a text saying "Hello World".
I deleted the default.htm file from the hdd, I uploaded my real asp.net
2.0 solution, deleted the default.htm entry in the Document properties
and added default.aspx.
But someway the "Hello world" text from the deleted default.htm is still
showing when my users types www.mydomain.com.
If I type www.mydomain.com/default.aspx, the correct page is showing.
I presume it is some kind of cache.
How do I fix this problem?? Can I clear the cache?
Thank you in advance!
M O J O Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380777
IIS Hangs. RAN IISState and would like the dump looked at
I have a Windows 2003 Server with SP1 and Sharepoint Installed. About once a
week IIS Hangs Generating no errors in the eventlog. There is a seperate web
created using static html and it becomes unavailable as well as sharepoint.
Stopping and restarting the iis services doesn't resolve the issue. A
Reboot is the only thing to bring iis/sharepoint back up. I have ran
IISState the last time this has happened and would love somebody to take a
look to see if anything can be found. I haven't found a place to link the
dump so if someone would give me an email address I will send it to them.
You can email me jwinter@jackhenry.com.
Thanks, Jared Winter Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380772
IIS requires Log In after domain change, clears w/reset & returns
We have a very odd thing happening. We migrated to a new domain (actually
split our domain into two new domains). Upon doing so, ALL IIS servers seem
to require a login to the box, even the external world to our company web
site, whether going there internally or externally. However, when we restart
IIS the problem goes away and then comes back some hours later. Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380769
dllhost.exe hanging
Hi all,
I have been really frustrated with this problem since the last 2
months. We have an ASP application thats running on Windows 2000 SP4
(all security patches up to date), IIS5 and Oracle 9i. Hard ware Load
balanced environment with two webservers and a db server. We tried
removing the load balancer and tried with only one webserver and db
server the problem persists. The problem is that intermittently the
dllhost.exe stops responding and does not serve any ASP pages. We have
to restart the IIS to get it back. At the time of the
non-responsiveness, I tried to write a test page (a single file under
the wwwroot folder)to connect to the db and it also failed. I put the
same page in a virtual directory but with Low isolation level and it
works fine. So the DB Server is good. Only the dllhost.exe is hanging.
1. Oracle 9.2.0.5 Server
2. Oracle 9.2.0.7 client
3. IIS 5
4. MDAC 2.8 SP1
5. Windows 2000 SP4
5. OLEDB for Oracle latest version
No information in DB logs, Event Viewer or IIS Logs. The ONLY piece of
information that I have is in the logging of our Application. I have
this
Provider Error. Native Error: -2147418113. Error: 0x8007ffff
Any help is greatly appreciated.
Thanks,
Vijay Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380767
ASP page not loading...
I have moved our sebsite to a new 2003 server & now my asp pages won't work.
Where/what do I change to allow asp pages to run?
Thanks- Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380766
IIS5.1 in XP and ASP problem
I have IIS5.1 on a Windows XP Pro SP2 machine. The extensions for ASP and
asa are missing the DLL files. Like "inetsrvasp.dll" how can I get this
back. Would this be on the original CD.
I have relinked asp, cer, cdx,asa,htr file extensions to asp.dll that was
found in the inetserv folder in system32.
If I try removing IIS and reinstalling it, it will not reinstall.
Note: The only XP disks I have tried was an XP CD (no SPs no updates) and XP
SP2 CD. Both fail to install IIS after uninstalling. If I install XP on a
clean test machine IIS will allow ASP.
What options do I have to get ASP back on the original machine?
Thanks Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380765
How can I increase file size for downloading..
Hi,
I'm trying to configure a site in IIS 6.0, W2003, but it has big files for
been donwloaded..
These are hughes files, How can I increase this size???
I read an article that explain something about it, but still i'm having
problem, i'm able to download file less than 80 MB of size, although I put
in the machine.comfig 300 000..
Any help would be great.
Thanks in advanced.
Michel
here is the article:
By default, ASP.NET only permits files that are 4,096 kilobytes (KB) (or
4MB) or less to be uploaded to the Web server. To upload larger files, you
must change the maxRequestLength parameter of the <httpRuntime> section in
the Web.config file.
Note When the maxRequestLength attribute is set in the Machine.config file
and then a request is posted (for example, a file upload) that exceeds the
value of maxRequestLength, a custom error page cannot be displayed.
By default, ASP.NET only permits files that are 4,096 kilobytes (KB) (or 4
MB) or less to be uploaded to the Web server. To upload larger files, you
must change the maxRequestLength parameter of the <httpRuntime> section in
the Web.config file.
Note When the maxRequestLength attribute is set in the Machine.config file
and then a request is posted (for example, a file upload) that exceeds the
value of maxRequestLength, a custom error page cannot be displayed. Instead,
Microsoft Internet Explorer will display a "Cannot find server or DNS" error
message.
If you want to change this setting for all of the computer and not just this
ASP.NET application, you must modify the Machine.config file.
By default, the <httpRuntime> element is set to the following parameters in
the Machine.config file:
<httpRuntime executionTimeout="90" maxRequestLength="4096"
useFullyQualifiedRedirectUrl="false" minFreeThreads="8"
minLocalRequestFreeThreads="4" appRequestQueueLimit="100" />
The Machine.config file is located in the \System
Root\Microsoft.NET\Framework\Version Number\CONFIG directory instead,
Microsoft Internet Explorer will display a "Cannot find server or DNS" error
message.
If you want to change this setting for all of the computer and not just this
ASP.NET application, you must modify the Machine.config file.
By default, the <httpRuntime> element is set to the following parameters in
the Machine.config file:
<httpRuntime executionTimeout="90" maxRequestLength="4096"
useFullyQualifiedRedirectUrl="false" minFreeThreads="8"
minLocalRequestFreeThreads="4" appRequestQueueLimit="100" />
The Machine.config file is located in the \System
Root\Microsoft.NET\Framework\Version Number\CONFIG directory Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380763
Default Web Sit will not start (red error Icon beside it)
Default Web Sit will not start (red error Icon beside it)
My IIS was working until I restarted my machine this afternoon. Then
it just stopped working
When I use the compmgmt.msc \s command I can see the default web site
with a red error icon beside it I have tried to re-install it but
nothing works. The event error says something about not being able to
bind but port 80 is free so there should be nothing wrong there.
The microsoft web site has nothing on this.
I am running Win XP Pro
Can anyone help. Thanks. Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380762
Ftp server demands password
I have recently used the FTP Server available for 2000 pro. I had no trouble and
pictures passed from my computer to UK with no bother.
I have had to set it up again and have followed the instructions available on
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;300662&sd=tech to the
letter for the second time.
Using a FTP client on another computer on the net I have noted that the program
does start and gets past the user which is anonymous but then says 'need
password' and scoots straight past with PASS(hidden) and finishes with not
logged in.
I have also bothered the neighbour with his computer but I get the same result.
The only concession I have allowed this time is to go into the router and set
the in and out filters for TCP to allow but that I presume was unneccessary as I
did not have to do that first time. I have in my mind blamed a program called
FileFolder which is new from MS. However to stop any misgivings, I have
re-installed 2000Pro and only brought across the Documents and Settings from the
old installation.
That is the sum total - if anyone else has the program working, I should like to
know how
Borge in sunny Perth, Australia
Borge in sunny Perth, Australia Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380761
Application pool recyle timout and hangs
I have a problem with my application pool.
I've an application running in it's own application pool on a IIS6 on
Windows Server 2003.
A month ago it started hanging a few times a day and the only thing to do
was a IIS reset or a manual application pool recycle.
I found a kb explaining that I should change max and minimum threads in
machine.config I changed that but no result.
I later started to get error messages in the EventViewer saing "A process
serving application pool 'XXXXX' exceeded time limits during shut down. The
process ID was 'yyyy'.
I then tried to raise the value of the shutdown time limit in the
application pool from 180 to 360 secunds.
That made it work for about a week, but today I had the same problem again.
Should I raise the time limit even more? or what's the best way of findig
out the real problem behind the shut down?
It's a ASP.NET 1.1 application
Regards,
/Mikael Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380748
"Service unavailable" error on Windows XP 64
Guys,
I'm getting a "Service unavailable" error message when trying to run even a
simple ASP application with one file default.asp with
<%
Response.Write "Test page"
%>
I've checked the web service extensions dialog and verified that ASP
applications are allowed to run.
Any ideas would be much appreciated.
Cheers
Matt Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380740
IIS sabotages Firefox
I'm sorry but I have just been burned with a discovery that IIS gives
different HTML output for a .Net page for IE than it does for Firefox.
In a test scenario, I have a menu (built as a table) that has a cell
wrapped with an asp:Panel web control whose sole purpose is to switch
visibility on and off based on permissions. In IE, it is shown as a
div tag but in Firefox it is shown as a table tag. Of course, you can
all imagine the lessons of pain produced with a table wrapped around a
cell but in a tablerow. Needless to say, if I save the source
generated by IE and show in the Firefox the static version (produced
for IE) shows like it should and not messed up. That is apparently one
of several issues with the HTML generation specific to a browser.
All of this said and done, I am posting this in an IIS group with hopes
that there is some magic switch or registry key that tells IIS - "stop
trying to be smart because you're not". This might be an issue for the
asp.net group but I decided to start here in hopes of an easy fix.
Thanks,
Chris Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380739
response content type "text/xml,
Hi
I´m using IIS 5 with ASP NET 2.0. I´ve develop an isapi application. the
response content type its text/hml it´s posible chaged to text/xml
thanks Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380727
IIS authentication/404 error
Hi,
(i'm a IIS newbie, so i hope my question is not a very stupid one)
I've installed and configured IIS 5.1 on a XP machine.
When i try to open an website from within our intranet it works fine
for my user account, on several workstations. When i try the same with
other user accounts i get a HTTP 404 Not Found errormessage.
My useraccount has exactly the same permissions as the other
useraccounts.
In IIS anonymous acces is true.
Can someone explain to me what's causing this?
TIA,
hero Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380726
=?Utf-8?Q?IIS_Logfile:_Filedatum_=C3=A4ndert_si?=
Hallo,
bitte um Hilfe beim IIS Logfile. Der IIS läuft auf Windows 2000 Server und
produziert ganz normal ein Logfile, das funktioniert auch, alles was ich
drinnen haben will, steht auch drinnen).
Das problem ist nur dass ich dieses Logfile automatisch analysieren will.
Habe dazu ein Programm in C# geschrieben, das mittels dem FileSystemWatcher
auf �nderungen dieser Datei horcht. Leider ändern sich Datum und Uhrzeit bei
dem Logfile aber nicht, wenn der IIS wieder Einträge dazu schreibt, darum
kann mein Programm natürlich auch nicht reagieren.
Das Logfile unter Windows Server 2003 zb. verhält sich wie ein "richtiges"
file.
Hat jemand eine Idee woran das liegen könnte, bzw. wie man das unter Windows
2000 Server beheben kann??
THX!!! Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380718
Can only see script for asp.net pages?
Hello all!
A couple of questions. I am working with a .net application from a third
party. When I go the webpage, it's shows me all the html script, and c#
code. The HTML pages work fine, and my default web site is fine. I also
notices in IIS in httpheader I don't have the asp.net in there, like I have
on other computers I work on. I do have 1.1 net framework installed. I am
running this IIS on Windows XP SP2. IIS 5.0.
Why is it showing scripts, and how do I add that ASP.net in the httpheader?
I know the application is fine, I have it running on a windows 2003 with IIS
6.0.
TIA!!!
Rudy
I have another Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380713
IIS 7 and PHP
Hi all,
I have trouble to configure PHP 5 (CGI mode) in IIS 7 on Vista 5308...
I have the following message in IE when accessing my script:
Server Error in 'Default Web Site' Application.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
HTTP Error 404.2 - Not Found
Description: The ISAPI/CGI configured for this request is not allowed to
execute
Error Code: 0x800704ec
Notification: ExecuteRequestHandler
Module: CgiModule
Requested URL: http://localhost:80/code/essai.php
Physical Path: C:\code\essai.php
Logon User: Anonymous
Logon Method: Anonymous
Handler: PHP
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Server Version Information: Internet Information Services 7.0.
I hav add the CGI configuration in the MMC and gave the rights
(to phe programm folder and script folder)
Ideas anyone?
Thx in advance Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380708
Configuration Problem
I'm trying to get IIS 5.1 working on a XP Professional machine. All
appears to work fine wil one notable exception. For some bizarre
reason, whatever files I want to display on my local server have to be
uploaded to two *different* locations -- the default inetpub\wwwroot
location and the location that I have specified the files to be.
If it makes a difference, I have installed PHP and MySQL on the machine
too, but this is the first time I've ever had this problem.
Help's appreciated.
-------
Clayton Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380703
Typical access problem with passwords
Hello
I am trying to reinstall my FTP Server (Windows) on my new system and it is
proving as hard as last time.
I've checked/done the following
1 FTP publication service is running
2 My dynamic DNS software is running, confirms update and my web site
works so the problem is not here.
3 Chosen a folder to allow access to through the FTP/Windows ISS system
The problem seems to be with Windows which asks me to log-on but refuses to
let me in
The folder I want to share has been chosen and the little hand appears under
the folder.
The authorisations are 'anonymous logon', 'invited Internet', 'invited' and
'everybody' as I wanted to be sure that nothing was blocking here.
All these accounts appear in 'security' too so that I was sure again that
nothing was causing a problem here (although I understand more or less that
all this shouldn't be neccessary)
In 'services ISS, I have ticked 'anonymous logon' and chosen an account for
anonymous logon to be allocated to (the 'invited internet account)
I've also left password blank.(even been in security options to make sure
blank passwords are accepted)
But when I try to log in, I get a refusal.
Since I've gone for the easiest solution first (blank password on invited
internet account) , I can't think what is wrong.
Can anyone help please?
Thanks in advance
Dave Neve Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380701
server 2003 iis6 and authentification
hi...
i created a website, which is only accessible to the administator group.
if i connect to the website via a normal pc, the browser is asking me for a
username and a password...all is working fine...
now the problem....why is the browser asking me for a username and password,
when i start the website on the server itself?
i am logged in as an administrator on the server...
and if i enter a valid username und password he doesn´t accept it....
i am not able to get into this website :(
on an external pc - it works...
i need this, because i am starting crone jobs (i have to call a asp website
every day via sceduled calls) and there nobody could enter a username :)
any suggestions? Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380697
IIS 5 on an XP machine
How can I utilize the FP extensions? I have them installed, but certain
none of the FP web components works when put into a web page, like the page
counter.
I'd appreciate any help I can get. I am using FrontPage 2003, if that makes
a difference.
--
You think you have problems?
Your problems pale in comparison!
http://68.233.186.18:8008/images/capetownwaters.jpg Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380692
Web site configured but not working
I have Windows server 2003 edition with IIS installed. I have configured
a website with IP address 210.212.82.188. This IP address was provided
by our ISP. The site could not be accessed from locations which are
outside my office. What are the possible reasons? Can anybody kindly
help!
--
amrendrapandey
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via http://www.webservertalk.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------
View this thread: http://www.webservertalk.com/message1446213.html Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380688
iis load balancing
I need advice on load balancing two Windows 2003 servers running IIS6.
have two web sites one internal and one external facing both of whic
connect to a database back end. For security reasons I was going t
give these web sites different IP addreses. Both servers have tw
network ports.
Can anyone offer advice on how to set up network load balancing o
them?
Jeremy
-
jbyrn
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Posted via http://www.webservertalk.co
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
View this thread: http://www.webservertalk.com/message1447703.htm Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380685
Server 2003
Discussion groups like this one are very helpful in pinning down problems
and solutions. Occasionally, however, a unique topic will be raised that is
unrelated and merits a discussion group and forum of its own. To this end I
wanted to set up NNTP on my personal computer to handle such occasional
topics unrelated.
Although I had IIs 5.1 (WinXP Pro) running the NNTP protocol is not
included. Rather than use IIS 5.0 (Win2K) I upgraded to Server 2003 IIs 6.0.
All I want to do is use the NNTP protocol and possibly a copy of the web
page I had running under IIS 5.1. I've seen a reference to a migration tool
but since NNTP was not available under IIs 5.1 there is no migration
reference.
Is there a step by step setup guide for NNTP or what is the simplest way to
setup NNTP under Server 2003? Tag: Certificate is going to expire Tag: 380684
I have an internal certificate on my iis 6.0 server that is going to expire.
How do I renew it?