Can't see my own port 8080

TheMSsForum.com: The Microsoft Software Forum

The MSS Forum ‹ IIS
- Archive
  - Biz
  - MCSE
  - CRM
  - Drivers
  - Framework
  - ADO
  - ASP
  - Compact
  - Forms
  - Dotnet
  - C#
  - VB
  - FontpageGen
  - Excel
  - WorkSheet
  - Exchange
  - Setup
  - Fox
  - Fontpage
  - ASP
  - IIS
  - Entourage
  - Money
  - Messanger
  - PocketPC
  - Powerpoint
  - Project
  - Publisher
  - Excel
  - VB
  - Security
  - Portal
  - Services
  - SQLServerDev
  - SVCS
  - SQLServer
  - VB
  - VC
  - MFC
  - ExcelGen

- Previous
  - 1
    - MI5 Persecution: Stasi 21/4/96 (16145) Subject: Chief Constable Alderson Condemns "Stasi" MI5 Newsgroups:uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,soc.culture.british Organization: Toronto Free-Net Summary: Keywords: John Alderson, former Chief Constable of Devon and Cornwall, had the following to say about the expansion of the Security Service's powers, in a recent magazine article; "It is fatal to let the secret service into the area of ordinary crime. MI5 is not under the same restraints as the police. They infiltrate organisations, people's jobs and lives. They operate almost like a cancer." "At the moment the acorn of a Stasi [the former East German communists' secret service] has been planted. It is there for future governments to build on." The message is clear. Criminal subversion and criminal harassment by an unpoliced minority not subject to the law, "infiltration of people's jobs and lives" is with us today. 16145 Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395948
  - 2
    - MI5 Persecution: Leant On 7/4/96 (14631) From: Green <Green@guidion.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't the British Police Doing Their Job? Reply-To: Green@guidion.demon.co.uk Date: Sun Apr 7 21:13:30 1996 In article <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net "Mike Corley" writes: > Last Easter (1995) I went into the local police station in London and spoke to > an officer about the harassment against me. But I couldn't provide tangible > evidence; what people said, in many cases years ago, is beyond proof, and > without something to support my statements I cannot expect a police officer to > take the complaint seriously. This in itself dos not suggest that the police have it in for you. The old bill operates on extremely tight spending limits forced on them by that pillock Michael Howard, and without evidence, they often have higher priorities than chasing something that cannot go to court. I doubt that the police are actually being leant on, but they probably realise that if they looked into this, they would be leant on hard. The met always stays away from anything that looks like it has Defence, Security or secret service interest already, because they realise that they are below these government agencies in the general pecking order. This attitude was made clear in a TV show where a left wing comedian heckled some aristocratic Tory candidate in a local election. The police officer gave the comic a ticking off, even though you could see that this young copper sympathised with the comedian, and regarded the Tory as an upper-crust wanker. He said, and I quote "I'm giving you the ticking off and not him because he's a Lord and I'm a Police Constable." If I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping on me, they would show me the door without even looking at my evidence, because that bored desk seargant with only five years to go before he retires doesn't want to start fucking about with somebody who has incurred the wrath of Stella Rimington. He would rather deal with the lost dogs and driving licence producers, eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and piss off home at the end of his shift than have some high ranking spook having a go at his boss and getting him a bollocking. In short, you have earned much sympathy but little surprise. Just remember that saying about the enemy of your enemies. Have a nice day. ******************************************* QUOTE OF THE DAY****************** * You have just read the opinons of : * "Common sense is merely the set * * * of prejudices a person acquires* ========================================================================= Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't the British Police Doing Their Job? Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british References: <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net> Organization: Toronto Free-Net Distribution: >This in itself dos not suggest that the police have it in for you. >The old bill operates on extremely tight spending limits forced on >them by that pillock Michael Howard, and without evidence, they >often have higher priorities than chasing something that cannot go >to court. I think the police know well what's going on. It is up to them to do something about it. They know I've made a complaint at a police station. I could probably do more to try to help myself (I think someone suggested making a written complaint to the chief constable) but even then I nthink they would not take action. > >I doubt that the police are actually being leant on, but they probably >realise that if they looked into this, they would be leant on hard. >The met always stays away from anything that looks like it has Defence, >Security or secret service interest already, because they realise that >they are below these government agencies in the general pecking order. > So we have a situation where the security service breaks the law, everyone knows MI5 breaks the law, and the police won't investigate crimes that would otherwise earn a jail sentence. Oh good, I'm really glad the UK is a democracy. (<sarcasm>, for those of you who didn't catch that) >If I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping on me, >they would show me the door without even looking at my evidence, because >that bored desk seargant with only five years to go before he retires >doesn't want to start fucking about with somebody who has incurred the >wrath of Stella Rimington. He would rather deal with the lost dogs and >driving licence producers, eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and piss >off home at the end of his shift than have some high ranking spook having >a go at his boss and getting him a bollocking. In this case I think it is 'high-ranking' police officers who are aware of the persecution, they know a complaint has been made, and they're doing nothing. What is more, I don't think there is anything I can do that would make them take action, both because they may be being 'leant on' and through the wider view that it could be deleterious to the state to have a persecution by state organs exposed. They're wrong in taking that point of view, because sooner or later this will all out anyway, and they it will be n years of police inaction (n>=6) that will be questioned. > >In short, you have earned much sympathy but little surprise. Just remember >that saying about the enemy of your enemies. > >Have a nice day. 14631 Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395947
  - 3
    - MI5 Persecution: Shoot to Kill 4/4/96 (13117) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british From: jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: How and Why Did it Start? Reply-To: jbaker@pobox.com Date: Thu Apr 4 05:03:01 1996 jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) wrote: >bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wrote: >>Why would >>the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and more than fiv >>years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because ... >So why didn't they just shoot you dead? >It would have been a lot cheaper. Please make the effort to respond to this point Mike. It was a serious question. Jill (my opinions are entirely my own, no-one else's) ================================================================= Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: How and Why Did it Start? Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british References: <Dp5IAr.1EB.0.bloor@torfree.net> Organization: Toronto Free-Net Distribution: jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) wrote: >bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wrote: >>Why would >>the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and more than fiv >>years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because ... >So why didn't they just shoot you dead? >It would have been a lot cheaper. I think there are two reasons nobody has taken physical action as opposed to verbal; a) A lot of people "know". Perhaps you the reader might not know, but lots of people in the media etc do. Remember, I was born in the UK and lived there until a couple of years ago. I don't think these people would condone state-sponsored murder of someone who might be seen on a good day as one of their own. b) Rather than doind anything directly, they're going for spying, verbal harassment, media harassment, every form of persecution short of the physical. Because as soon as anything turns physical, the police become involved; and unless it turns physical, the police can shrug and say 'not our problem'. So they persecute you and try to get you to react, either by hitting one of them (in which case I clearly find myself in the wrong as far as the police are concerned), or by trying to harm myself (in which case they can pretend they weren't responsible). It's a pretty unproductive form of harassment actually, because if you don't react then they're wasting they're time. Or perhaps they're just cheap bullies and trying to wreck someone's life, without any ulterior motive? 13117 Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395946
  - 4
    - MI5 Persecution: Email Cruelty 11/3/96 (11603) From: D.S.Toube@qmw.ac.uk (David Toube) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.legal,uk.media,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: Why Censorship Must Not Be Allowed on Uk.* Reply-To: D.S.Toube@qmw.ac.uk Date: Mon Mar 11 11:47:13 1996 A OSHINEYE <TA5330@QMWCC7.qmw.ac.uk> wrote: :D.S.Toube@qmw.ac.uk (David Toube) wrote: :>I would also be very pleased if Mike Corley would not mailbomb me :>via my university account with messages entitled 'This Is What :>You Get For Censorship', thus closing down the entire college :>email system. :> :>Although it does not personally inconvenience me, it is rather :>dull for the college. :When did this happen? BTW you can always use Pegasus Mail to send all :email from Corley's address back to him and see how he likes it. :--Ade : This weekend. The result, Mike Corley will be gratified to hear, was that all users of the college system were prevented from using email. I suspect that there is no stopping Mike Corley. If mail is automatically returned to him, he will return it back to you tenfold. If he is thrown off his account, as he surely will be, he will find another one. I do not care whether Mike Corley has an email account or not. It is a matter of supreme indifference to me whether his fanciful account of persecution is aired or not. If he thinks that he has been persecuted by M15 and Chris Tarrant, then that is a matter for him. But there is a world of difference between repeatedly spamming usenet - which is unacceptable - and setting up a Web Site containing his post, which is entirely acceptable. Then it will be possible to choose whether or not to partake of his fantasy. However although I would not like to see the censorship of posts because they demonstrate evidence of mental illness, I suspect that Mike Corley will inevitably be censored by his ISP following a number of complaints of usenet abuse and mailbombing. ---- David Toube Lecturer in Law QMW, University of London WWW: http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~ugtl027/index.html David Boothroyd's British Elections Home Page WWW: http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~laws/election/home.html 11603 Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395945
  - 5
    - MI5 Persecution: Jeff Rooker MP 5/3/96 (10089) From: rael@midnight.org (Rael A. Fenchurch) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. Date: Tue Mar 5 04:37:52 1996 Mike, >"go away" replies, and one from a Labour MP saying he was aware of my situation >but wouldn't help me because he regarded me as the "bad guy". Gee thanks, they >do this and then offload the shame they should feel onto you by telling you "oh >but it's your fault". It's a mad world. Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment, you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the main reasons we all think you've truly gone fishing. So? Rael... ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Rael A. Fenchurch (rael@midnight.org, http://www.midnight.org/rael/) --- --- "I don't think compassion's the language of our time" --- --- "Doubt or Die" --- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ========================================================================== From: Andy Howard <andy@kiss100.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. Reply-To: andy@kiss100.demon.co.uk Date: Tue Mar 5 06:06:15 1996 In article: <DnrMsq.239.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wr I got a few > "go away" replies, and one from a Labour MP saying he was aware of my situatio > but wouldn't help me because he regarded me as the "bad guy". Which Labour MP Mike? > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Andy Howard EMail andy@kiss100.demon.co.uk | | My opinions, not my employer's (Jolly nice people though they are). | | If my employers shared my opinions... Well, frankly I'd be amazed | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ==================================================================== Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.br$ Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.b$ References: <DnFtLs.E37.0.bloor@torfree.net> <4h45nq$87o_002@leeds.ac.uk> <4h6gkb$ivc$ Organization: Toronto Free-Net Distribution: Mike Corley (bu765@torfree.net) wrote: : >Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned : >copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment, : >you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the : >main reasons we all think you've truly gone fishing. So? : The letter was by email, not on paper. (In addition to snail-mailing, I : emailed all the relevant addresses I could find.) I'll see if I can find : it, I keep a record of most of this correspondence so I may still have it. I'm afraid I don't have a copy of the correspondence. In future I will keep useful letters, so with luck there may be a "next time". The MP was Jeff Rooker, Labour MP. Having looked again at the Labour web page I find he doesn't have an address listed, but I have a record of his address as having been jeff.rooker@geo2.poptel.org.uk. I don't know where I got the address from. I'm so disorganised! ==================================================================== Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british From: J.J.Smith@ftel.co.uk (John J Smith) Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. X-Nntp-Posting-Host: death-on-the-rock.ftel.co.uk Message-ID: <Dnw49L.D1H@ftel.co.uk> Sender: smid@death-on-the-rock.ftel.co.uk (RFC931) Organization: Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Ltd References: <DnFtLs.E37.0.bloor@torfree.net> <DnrMsq.239.0.bloor@torfree.net> <Dnsrnu.Jr1.0.bloor@torfree.net> <DntKEo.86E.0.bloor@torfree.net> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 09:12:56 GMT Lines: 54 In article <DntKEo.86E.0.bloor@torfree.net>, Mike Corley <bu765@torfree.net> wrote: >Mike Corley (bu765@torfree.net) wrote: >: >Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned >: >copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment, >: >you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the >: >main reasons we all think you've truly gone fishing. So? > >: The letter was by email, not on paper. (In addition to snail-mailing, I >: emailed all the relevant addresses I could find.) I'll see if I can find >: it, I keep a record of most of this correspondence so I may still have it. > >I'm afraid I don't have a copy of the correspondence. In future I will keep >useful letters, so with luck there may be a "next time". Don't believe you. Because that might be proof, and we just *cant* have that. >The MP was Jeff Rooker, Labour MP. Having looked again at the Labour web page I >find he doesn't have an address listed, but I have a record of his address as >having been jeff.rooker@geo2.poptel.org.uk. I don't know where I got the >address from. I'm so disorganised! I did Email this MP yesterday. This is what I wrote: Smid>I am sorry to bother you, but there is a person with a known Smid>personality disorder on the internet usenet, claiming that you Smid>as an MP have backed up his claims that he is being persecuted Smid>by MI5. Smid>His name is Mike Corely, and posts from canada (email address Smid>available if you require). Smid> Smid>He claims that you have told him that his claims that the Smid>"television is watching him", are justified, yet cannot find the Smid>email in which he did so.. Smid>I'd be interested in what you have said to him, because we have Smid>had a long term battle to convince him that he really is schizophrenic Smid>and that Chris Tarrent, MI5 and Martin Lewis from News On Ten are Smid>persecuting him... If you do have the original Email, then that'd Smid>be nice... Smid>If you nothing of this subject, it would not suprise me, however. His reply, surpise, suprise was: MP>No idea what you are on about. I am getting really sick of some of MP>the junk on E mail. I just dump it so he may have contacted MP>but as to an answer I 've better things to do. Your move, Mike. Smid 10089 Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395944
  - 6
    - MI5 Persecution: Flight or fight 7/1/96 (8575) From: huge@axalotl.demon.co.uk (Hugh Davies) Newsgroups: uk.misc Subject: Re: persecution rant (re-post) Reply-To: huge@axalotl.demon.co.uk Date: Sun Jan 7 04:43:41 1996 Yo, Mike, Happy New Year! Haven't you killed yourself yet? In article <DKMIs5.158.0.bloor@torfree.net>, bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wri >For anyone who hasn't yet read this, There is no-one in the known Universe who hasn't read this at least 5 times. >and really really wants to then here No-one wants to read it, Mike. It's drivel. >is the article that was posted last year in this newsgroup.... Over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again.... -- Regards, Huge. ================================================== Subject: persecution rant (re-post) Newsgroups: uk.misc Organization: Toronto Free-Net Summary: Keywords: >Yo, Mike, Happy New Year! Haven't you killed yourself yet? But I can't, you see then I wouldn't know how things would turn out ("we're only doing this because we don't know how it's all going to end" - logic error in line 100) >There is no-one in the known Universe who hasn't read this at least 5 times. It doesn't seem to have done a whole lot of good since the good old persecution stuff is still going on. Over Christmas I was flying BA and got hassled by a couple of people on the flight (sounds like something you've heard before, doesn't it?). All the usual stuff about the town I'd been staying, "he doesn't know who we are", self-justification that we're doing it because he's a "nutter" etc. Real friendly like. Also a fairly obvious wind-up and attempt to get some reaction. I think they're trying quite hard to get a reaction. If I hit someone on a flight over the Atlantic, am I actually breaking any laws, and if so whose? Is a BA aircraft British territory subject to British laws while it's in mid-flight? It is really tempting to "reply" and that's obviously what they want, so who am I to refuse a blow to the head for people who ask for it so consistently? 8575 Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395943
  - 7
    - MI5 Persecution: Dihydrocodeine 26/11/95 (7061) From: michaelm@easynet.co.uk (michaelm@easynet.co.uk) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.radio.uk Subject: Re: Britain's Shame (repost) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1995 09:19:13 GMT Organization: ------------ Lines: 89 Message-ID: <817374781.20251@michaelm.easynet.co.uk> References: <DIM34L.755.0.bloor@torfree.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: michaelm.easynet.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: michaelm.easynet.co.uk X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corblymee) wrote: | In June 1990 a horrifying campaign of harassment was initiated in London by | what are believed to be elements of the security services. The harassment has | continued for over five years, starting from the broadcast and print media, | and encompassing abuse through set-up situations and by people in public | places. It has been brought to the attention of the police and they are aware | what is happening, but are not taking any action to prevent it. <whopping great snip of 884 lines> corley, you puzzle me! i've narrowed your possible motives down to one or more of the following: 1) you work on behalf of the british government with a hidden agenda of furthering the largely right wing (most to hide) censorship brigade's cause, "a drug-crazed psycho posting dangerous nonsense - how very very sad - but in the public interest,we must act." draft internet (censorship) bills rolling off hm govt's banders at this very moment, I don't doubt it! 2) you work for the daily mail which has started to feel the "internet pinch" as it suddenly clicks in the chronically adled minds of yet more and more of their readers - that shudder-inducing realisation that the entire editorial staff at the mail are scaremongering, imbecilic, blood-leeching , totalitarian twats - can any else sense a coordinated campaign on its way ??- "Mail urges (their) government to act - internet safety endangered by uncontrolled surfing lunatics - boys hands blown off by internet maniacs - net porn responsible for 392323rd rape " .net porn responsible for 392324th rape " .net porn responsible for 392325th rape " .net porn responsible for 392326th rape " .net porn responsible for 392327th rape " net porn responsible for 392328th rape " .net porn responsible for 392329th rape " <yawn> .net porn responsible for 392330th rape " .net porn responsible for 392331st rape " .net porn responsible for 392332nd rape " net porn responsible for 392333rd rape " <yawn> .net porn responsible for 392334th rape " .net porn responsible for 392335th rape " .net porn responsible for 392336th rape " .net porn responsible for 392337th rape " net porn responsible for 392338th rape " etcetera, straight from the old nag's mouth.. lee-potter (and english), take particular note.. (how ever you two common ********* managed to avoid encarceration for what was, quite evidently,wilful contempt of court in the regina v taylforth & knights case, is frankly beyond me.. those dreaded and now all too familiar words "endemic corruption" were muttered by at least one Q.C. >3) you (at least) believe there's (some) substance to your claim(s) and you >have a genuine axe to grind. If so, bloody well go for it, but scrape the >heavy layer of steaming dung off the top (that's assuming you're even >capable of distinguishing fantasy from reality.) 4) you (as an email address) are serving as some bizarre "educational" programme orchestrated by the psychiatric industry - ever keen to justify enforced electrical lobotomies, electroshock and dwugs .All poised for the echo? - "corley frigging well needs lobotomising" 5) you're just clinically insane with absolutely no comprehension or insight into the consequences you will possibly face as a result of repeatedly posting what, certainly on the face of it, looks like complete and utter bullshit. 6) you're some weirdo prankster(s) - probably a group of student psychiatrists having a cheap crack whilst high as kites on pilfered dihydrocodeine. 7) You are infact working for the ss yourself, gauging public awareness of the extent and methods of bugging - infinity transmitters, microwave surveillance devices, satellite tracking equipment, 'chipping' of black crims, say no more. 8) You're fuelling the central usenet administration committee, who, it is believed, are keen to see the introduction of a wide-reaching framework of self-created powers relating to posting cancellation. (see the 'son of RFC1036') my bet's on (5) - but just fuck off corley- irritate the lard-arsed canucks instead. The cia's financing of "professor" cameron's brain-washing experiments in montreal.. would be a good starting point ... or perhaps "professor" watts and his widely admired masterful double eye-jabbing trick - a couple of wallops with an icepick. such a waste of perfectly edible four year old hispanics !!!!.. Perhaps the old marylebone rd posse could fill us in with a few more facts on this one...?? You are all on the .net now ????? A very warm welcome :-) ... christmas rapidly approaching.. >business booming?? Do we all get a look in at flotation ??!! ====================================================== From: Gulliver <kst2co@herts.ac.uk> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.radio.uk Subject: Re: Britain's Shame (repost) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1995 18:25:32 +0000 Organization: University of Hertfordshire Lines: 12 Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951126182156.16879B-100000@altair.herts.ac.uk> References: <DIM34L.755.0.bloor@torfree.net> <817343873snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: altair.herts.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII In-Reply-To: <817343873snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk> Actually, upon thinking about Mike's story it reminds me of someone I heard about who suffered from a persecution copmlex. He was an immigrant from some Eastern Bloc country who believed that 30 years after he emigrated the KGB were still after him. He would blame them if he had difficulty unlocking his car for instance (he reckoned they were putting something into the locks!). Something is very wrong, probably in Mike's head but what the hell, loonies make life more fun! -- Angus Gulliver ======================================================= Subject: Castrate the depraved MI5 buggers now Newsgroups: uk.misc Organization: Toronto Free-Net >Something is very wrong, probably in Mike's head but what the hell, >loonies make life more fun! Something is very wrong when the security services abandon their usual target of politicians and the well-known, to pursue the hitherto unknown nonentities such as myself. >corley, you puzzle me! Why? Because of my pathological truthfulness? >3) you (at least) believe there's (some) substance to your claim(s) and you >have a genuine axe to grind. If so, bloody well go for it, but scrape the >heavy layer of steaming dung off the top (that's assuming you're even >capable of distinguishing fantasy from reality.) Bloody well go for it I will. I think the "standard spiel" is quite studded with facts actually. There's plenty of "meat" there if the appropriate people can be motivated to get their act together and pursue the case. >my bet's on (5) - but just fuck off corley- irritate the lard-arsed canucks >instead. The cia's financing of "professor" cameron's brain-washing the lard-arsed canucks (?) are irritating me, but you don't want to hear about that >business booming?? Do we all get a look in at flotation ??!! 7061 Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395942
  - 8
    - MI5 Persecution: A new Kafka? 3/10/95 (5547) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.media,uk.politics From: jackson@soldev.tti.com (Dick Jackson) Subject: Re: What it's like to be watched by the security services Message-ID: <1995Oct13.225312.6514@ttinews.tti.com> Sender: usenet@ttinews.tti.com (Usenet Admin) Nntp-Posting-Host: soldev Organization: Citicorp-TTI at Santa Monica (CA) by the Sea References: <DFy9tB.3JK.0.bloor@torfree.net> <813188298snz129.os2.7@blackcat.demon.co.uk> <DGE7uJ.8tF.0.bloor@torfree.net> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 22:53:12 GMT Lines: 34 In article <DGE7uJ.8tF.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) writes: > >Strangers in the street have recognized me on sight many times, and shown >awareness of the current thread of abuse. To give you one example, in 1992 >I was seriously ill, and a manager at work somewhat humouroursly said that >"it wasn't fair" that people were bullying me. A few days later, I >attended for the first time a clinic in London as an outpatient, and on my >way out was accosted by someone who asked if "they had paid my fare", with >emphasis on the word "fare". He repeated the word several times in this >different context; that they should have paid my "fare", each time >emphasising the word. > >For two and a half years from the time their harassment started until >November 1992 I refused to see a psychiatrist, because I reasoned that I >was not ill of my own action or fault, but through the stress caused by >harassment, and that a lessening of the illness would have to be >consequent to a removal of its immediate cause, in other words a cessation >of harassment. I also reasoned that since they were taunting me with jokes >about mental illness, if I were to seek treatment then the abusers would >think that they had "won" and been proved "right". <I've deleted a lot, but I think this gives the idea> I have so far not contributed to this tread, it has been unpleasant in my opinion. However, I was struck by the resemblance of the above passages to the writing of Franz Kafka. Viz. while from an objective viewpoint it seems to refer to a abnormal world, in a strange way it does resonate strongly at other levels. Mr. Corley, have you tried to write for publication? I honestly think it might lead somewhere positive. Dick Jackson (serious for a change and expecting to get beaten up) 5547 Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395940
  - 9
    - MI5 Persecution: Do they fear truth? 3/10/95 (4033) From: flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Krüger) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.politics,alt.politics.british Subject: Re: What it's like to be watched by the security services Date: 3 Oct 1995 15:38:20 GMT Organization: Steinkrug Publications Lines: 66 Message-ID: <44rldc$nrm@news.cityscape.co.uk> References: <DFus24.HxB.0.bloor@torfree.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: aa040.du.pipex.com X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+ In article <DFus24.HxB.0.bloor@torfree.net>, bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) says: > >It completely mystifies me how it can be done. One night in June 1992 I >was in a bed-and-breakfast in Oxford (some hard facts now, you?ll be >bored of the generalisations). I booked the B&B from the office phone. >So if they had the office bugged, or the phone system bugged, they could >have heard the call. If it was as late as 1992 then there was already a system available to feed digital video out of a domestic TV via the mains. Each raster of video was preceded by a sixteen bit address which identified the television set. All that was needed was a decoder box plugged into the mains somewhere between your room and the grid transformer. The signal was decoded and then fed down to the phone line. They probably even had a PC which enabled them to see the picture as well. By 1992 the technology had moved on from slowscan to near real time video with the advent of devices from Brooktree and Harris etc. >the newsreader reacted. Breathed deeply, as if in psychological relief. Maybe, or perhaps as if in:- sci.psychology.announce sci.psychology.consciousness sci.psychology.journals.psyche sci.psychology.journals.psycoloquy sci.psychology.misc sci.psychology.personality sci.psychology.psychotherapy sci.psychology.research sci.psychology.theory >I can't describe to you what goes through your mind when you know >someone on TV is "seeing" you the viewer. You?re doing OK so far. >Your instinct is to switch the TV off, to change channel, Not much point unless you switch off the TV at the mains >like an ostrich, Looks like Ostrich farming is going to catch on in the UK as you may have seen in some of the other uk newsgroups >The one time I did directly ask someone in the company who knew what was >going on, first he spewed wool about, "well we have to think what is >reality and what is proof anyway", then went into barefaced denial liar >mode. It opens your eyes, if they can't say out loud what they keep >saying in a disguised fashion, they must fear exposure, they must fear >the truth. wool_ barefaced_ denial_ liar_ eyes_ fashion_ fear_ exposure, How is your mother these days Mike? And BTW - How is the thesis coming along? Peter Kruger ------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.gold.net/flames/ flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk 4033 Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395939
  - 10
    - MI5 Persecution: Grievous Bodily Harm 2/10/95 (2519) From: jeibisch@revolver.demon.co.uk (James Eibisch) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.politics,uk.media,rec.arts.tv.uk.misc Subject: Re: Auntie gets it in the emails Reply-To: jeibisch@revolver.demon.co.uk Date: Mon Oct 2 19:44:19 1995 lig0007@queens-belfast.ac.uk (TOM OATES) wrote: >However, I'm pleased to say that, in the past couple of days, Mike Corley has >stopped doing it and he appears (I say this cautiously) to be acting more >reasonably. True, his postings are still based on paranoid delusions. >However, so long as he doesn't go back to his old practices of multiple, >identical, unreadable postings, I'm sure that most people on this newsgroup >are willing to put up with him. Time to come out of the woodwork of this thread (or variations thereof)... I find it annoying that discussion of Mike's situation is spread over multiple threads - it makes it hard to follow, and especially to follow up. If it could be consolidated into one thread on relevant newsgroups (I'm reading this on uk.media btw). I'm a little surprised with the volume of abuse Mike has received, but believe strongly in freedom of speech if such a thing were to exist, which clearly includes abuse as much as anything. One thing which has been missing from this discussion is this simple prognosis: that maybe Mike is right and that, despite his admitted mental condition, there really is a campaign against him organised by now-influential ex-students of his university. Does anyone remember the TV series GBH, a fictional account of security service and governmental power games? Fictional, certainly, but one of the most powerful pieces of TV drama I've seen in many years, fascinating and quite believable, even. The fact is, as Mike has pointed out (oh, so many times :-), that the security services _do_ have the influence, contacts, resources, and time to conduct such a campaign of surveillance and even psychological terror if they so chose. If they have this power, then they will surely use it We still don't have all the facts from Mike, and the most pertinent here I think would be about his time at university - the people who took against him, the ringleaders. We need to know far more about Mike: his political and social affiliations, put in context with his univeristy years, the enemies he made, the reasons people ganged up on him at the very early stages. I don't subscribe to conspiracy theories generally, but I know there is far more that goes on in the universities, old boy's clubs, civil and secret services and Parliament than is ever made public. Mike, I leave it to you to construct a _single_ thread in a relevant newsgroup about this topic and keep to this thread to give us new information and answer questions about your situation. Ignore the 'Mike Corley is a nutter' posts unless they are relevant. Give us more detail. Who knows? It may be true, stranger things have happened. _ James Eibisch ('v') N : E : T : A : D : E : L : I : C : A Reading, U.K. (,_,) http://metro.turnpike.net/J/jeibisch/ ======= ------------------------------- Tue, 03 Oct 1995 04:01:34 uk.misc Thread 3 of 14 Lines 58 Re: Auntie gets it in the emails Respno 16 of 16 J.J.Smith@ftel.co.uk John J Smith at Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Ltd In article <812677261.12841@revolver.demon.co.uk>, James Eibisch <jeibisch@revolver.demon.co.uk> wrote: >lig0007@queens-belfast.ac.uk (TOM OATES) wrote: >One thing which has been missing from this discussion is this simple >prognosis: that maybe Mike is right and that, despite his admitted >mental condition, there really is a campaign against him organised by >now-influential ex-students of his university. We're trying to find this out on uk.misc. He's posted some *new* *huge* replies (which I'd have to give up my day job to reply to), detailing some things like: a) Mike Corley is *not* his real name b) Exactly what the "abuse" is (it seems be such things, as taking completely unrelated newspaper articles, striving to make them a disgusting insult, then redirecting against himself). c) How he came to the conclusion. I think he's doing rather better nowadays.. >Does anyone remember the TV series GBH, a fictional account of security >service and governmental power games? Fictional, certainly, but one of >the most powerful pieces of TV drama I've seen in many years, >fascinating and quite believable, even. This would be a point, apart from the fact that this was directed against someone of political importance. I don't believe Mike is... >The fact is, as Mike has pointed out (oh, so many times :-), that the >security services _do_ have the influence, contacts, resources, and time >to conduct such a campaign of surveillance and even psychological terror >if they so chose. If they have this power, then they will surely use it >at some point against some people. It appears he has formed the Security Service conclusion, because they are the only ones capable of doing it. A "searching for an enemy capable of it". >We still don't have all the facts from Mike, and the most pertinent here >I think would be about his time at university - the people who took >against him, the ringleaders. We need to know far more about Mike: his >political and social affiliations, put in context with his univeristy >years, the enemies he made, the reasons people ganged up on him at the >very early stages. I'm beginning to think that we never will get all the facts from Mike. We may, however, get enough... >Mike, I leave it to you to construct a _single_ thread in a relevant >newsgroup about this topic and keep to this thread to give us new >information and answer questions about your situation. Ignore the 'Mike >Corley is a nutter' posts unless they are relevant. Uk.misc, me boy... Smid ========================================================== From: flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Kr|ger) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.conspiracy Subject: Re: What it's like to be watched by the security services Date: Tue Oct 3 15:41:54 1995 In article <44rrrh$t6v@news.ox.ac.uk>, idaniel@jesus.ox.ac.uk (Illtud Daniel) says: > >And what do you mean when you state that the symptoms are too >'textbook'? Are the textbooks wrong? I think what is meant by 'textbook' is that some of the symptoms of 'illness' displayed in the posts seem to have been lifted from textbooks describing mental instability and personality disorders. I must admit I haven't seen Mike's postings before has he only just started posting again? Peter Kruger ------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.gold.net/flames/ flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk 2519 Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395937
  - 11
    - MI5 Persecution: Goldfish and Piranha 29/9/95 (1005) I just thought I'd let you know what I've been reading into the "Crusader" spam. I don't want to post this to usenet because somebody might try to tie that in to my posts in some way (someone already has, in uk.misc). First of all, I'd like to ask you to believe that my phone line in my apartment is bugged, and has been for many months. I have moved a couple of times this year, but "they" have faithfully been on my trail. Anyway, let's suppose my phone line is bugged. Now, when I talk to my internet service provider, it's over a SLIP (now PPP) connection. So if you wanted to bug what was said, either you'd listen in over the line and have to decode the transmission, or you could go to the service provider (more difficult) and ask them to decode a particular user's connection. OK, so now they're listening to everything I do over my SLIP/PPP connection. A couple of months ago I was messing around with faking articles through nntp servers and through anonymous remailers. I chose a nice inconspicuous newsgroup for my little tests, something no-one would ever notice. Guess which newsgroup I chose??? Yes, _FISH_!!! or rec.aquaria to be precise And guess what articles I tried to post? Goldfish, Koi carp and, you'll never guess... PIRANHA!!! The goldfish article and the Koi went through, but the piranha didn';t appear. by now you probably think this is too silly for words. But if you look in the papers a few eeks ago you will find John Major, Tonny Blair and Paddy Ashdown sharing a "private joke" about Major's sunburnt goldfish. We haven't had anything about Koi yet (they must be too dull ). Now, sent by someone who clearly knew what they were doing (they chose an Italian backbone site for their launch point) we have many thousands of messages to people all over the globe. All about piranha, and with the punchline "that gives you something to think about, doesn't it?" The way it works is that they're trying to kill two birds with one stone again. I don't knoiw why they should be against these national alliance people, but my interpretation is that they simultaneously try to discredit them, and stem the flow of Corley articles. ================================================================= In article <DFnE55.8tF.0.bloor@torfree.net>, Mike Corley <bu765@torfree.net> wrote: > >John J Smith (J.J.Smith@ftel.co.uk) wrote: > >: b) we do know who you are. Or are you someone else we don't know about? >: You are currently known as "That bloody persistant net nutter, who's >: expanding from uk.misc to the rest of the world". > >I think the point I was trying to make is that I could tell you things >from my personal life, at home and at work, which would add credibility >to my story. But if I named people, then (a) they would object violently >to being included in this shenanigans, and (b) I would be revealing my >identity which would be bad for my personal life and my work life. Of >course some people in my personal life, and at work, do know who "mike >corley" is. But at least we're observing a studied silence for now. :People can always be called "MR X", to save them being named. : :I'm completely perplexed as to what you mean by b). Revealing identity? :To who? And why would this be bad for any part of your life when you :already have a less than respectful reputation here? I'll just enumerate one or two things that I can still remember. Sometime around August/Sept 1992 I was living in a house in Oxford, and coming out of the house was physically attacked by someone - not punched, just grabbed by the coat, with some verbals thrown in for good measure. That was something the people at work shouldn't have known about... but soon after a couple of people were talking right in front of me about, "yeah, I heard he was attacked". Again, one I went for a walk in some woods outside Oxford. The next day, at work, someone said "you know he went to the forest yesterday". I don't want to put details on usenet of what happened because to do so would be to risk it happening again. If you put ideas in peoples' heads then you can find them reflecting back at you, and I don't want that. Also I can't remember that much from three years ago. From november 1992 I started taking "major tranquilizers" and just blotted the whole thing from my mind. >This is a feature time and time again, that the security services >(presumed) get at you by manipulating other people around you to get at >you. If you have their contacts, manpower, resources and technology then >you can do that sort of thing. :But why? Are you a threat? They pretend they "have" to get at me. After the first few weeks they had to find a reason to spy and abuse. You can't abuse someone unless they're in the wrong in some way. What I did "wrong" was to be ill. So it became "nutter" and "monster" and "he's going to attack us" coupled with "ha ha ha, he can't do anything to defend himself, it was so funny". That obvious contradiction within their propaganda is something they blithely ignore. :So, the Security Services never *actually* appear, and you assume that :they get someone else to do your dirty work. This is a bit of a big :logical step, here: That person doesn't like me, or is causing me trouble, :it's not because they've got problems themselves, it must be the "Security :Services". Yes. Because people are infallible. Or is there more? A single source is indicated because of the range of harassment. BBC + Capital + manipulated_public_at_large + set_up_situations, what does that add up to? Add in the technology to carry out the covert spying and the manpower and knowhow to follow you around for five years without being spotted. It smells very much of the security services, because there is no other organization (to my knowledge) which does the things I've seen these people do. Remember, they have deliberately chosen the softest of soft targets to victimize. They purposely chose a mentally ill person who they thought would be likely to kill himself anyway, so that they could get away with murder. And in all likelihood it will have started as a personal vendetta by someone. Who could that be? I don't know, but I can give you some clues. The first possibility (deep breath) is that someone from my college set me up. Six years ago I graduated from university in the UK, during the last year there I was steadily getting more and more ill. I know that I was talking in my sleep; although I don't know what I was saying, it got me a reputation, and if someone from my college talked afterwards to the "wrong" people then that could be the reason for all that has followed. I think that's the strongest contender for source. Directly beneath my room lived another bloke who frequently had his friends round late at night, after the time that I went to sleep. So they could have heard what I was saying in my sleep, and that could have got me the reputation for "talking to myself". What I don't know is why that should have rebounded a year after I left. You'd think it would have happened sooner; it's a bit odd to wait for a year and then start abuse. That leads me to question what in particular happened around May/June 1990 for them to start then. >What I don't know is how it looks from the other side, from the side of >the people who are being manipulated to get at me. On a couple of >occasions I have challenged people to tell the truth of the matter, but >they have alwats ducked the challenge. :Have you ever considered the possibility, that you have made a mistake, and :the people don't know what you are talking about? Yes. I am currently considering the possibility that some people around me know only what is being posted on Usenet, and have not been "contacted" by "them". But I _know_ that others have been contacted. :What words? Are they in common use? Could they be a catchphrase of a :popular comedian?: "Nice to see you, to see you nice"? In England the all-time No. 1 is "nutter". Easter this year, returning home from Clapham police station to report five years of harassment ("we're not saying it's happening and we're not saying it isn't happening"), another "not happening" incident of harassment when a cowardly little slut did her country proud by yelling "nutter, nutter, nutter" in the face of the hated enemy. What can you do about that? You can't yell abuse back in their face, because they know they're supported by their peers, by the media, by the murderers in the security forces. You can't put them down when the fascist establishment is on their side. You can't hit them, because they would deny their abuse, they would deny knowing anything, and bring charges against the "nutter" who attacked them "at random". >You know, you're >passing saomeone, they're hardly going to construct an argument for your >benefit, so they work a word of abuse into the conversation which they >can giggle at. :Abuse such as what? We're all adults here, we can take it. Is this abuse :aimed at you? How can you tell it is? I think I've said already what the words are. Thing is, at any given time the language is consistent. In January everyone's calling you X, then a few weeks later people stop calling you X and start calling you Y. You can tell it's aimed at me, because when people repeatedly say the same words are you walk past, then laugh, you would have to be hard of understanding not to recognize it. >Or they repeat something that's been said somewhere else... the PE thing >being a case in point. PE says it, then other people pick up the refrain. :Remind me who PE is again. PE = "Private Eye" >: >To give you an example, which I mentioned in another posting. In around >: >October 1992, Private Eye ran a cover with the heading "Major's support >: >lowest ever", with John calling to Norma on the cover "come back, Norma". >: >Only one obvious interpretation to that, isn';;t there? I certainly >: >thought so when I saw that cover. Wrongo!! Down the pub with people from work >: >Simon says to phil, "don';t you think it's wrong then?" phil says, "well >: >private eye are usuallyright"..."hislop strikes again.. > >: Erm. Mike? Heeeelllllooo? What are you on about. What is the other >: interpretation then? Norma having an affair? Seems a bit wrong, with the >: heading "Majors support Lowest ever"... > >No, this one isn't obvious , it really does need to be explained. I >certainly didn't understand it when I first saw it. You see, the kernel >of vitriol is in the words "come back". At the time, the themes of >abuse were centred around interpretations of those two words (stretch your >mind a little bit, I don't have to spell it out for you, surely). :You did in your mail item. : :You seem to be scouting about something called a "Double Entendre". The :inference being "Come" = Ejaculation, "Back" = Anus (not the first part :of the body I would have went for, I would have foolishly gone for "Back", :silly old me). : :You see to have picked a sodomy double entendre out of a Private Eye :headline. They are everywhere. The English language has much double :meaning in it, and if you put your mind to it, you could pull a double :entendre out of a randomly chosen page of the bible. So what? >The point is that when Simon pointed it out to Phil, he did recognise >what it meant after a moment's thought... and so did I... and so did the >people who repeated it several times later... so however murky it may >seem to you, that is the meaning they intended it to have... I still don't really know if the meaning was intended when that headline was written, or if it was simply "found" after the fact. The reason I think it might be the former is that I got quite a lot of abuse along the lines of "sound-alike" or "double-entendre" at work, in particularly from Steve. So "double" inevitably came to mean split-personality, "two people in one"; "back" inevitably came to mean "backside", "come" inevitably meant you-know- what, "split" (well, we'd better split now) again you can guess, "bent" (of a similar bent), the list goes on forever. These aren't "nice" double- entendres intended for comedy, they're nasty words to humiliate and cause pain. If I could turn the clock back three years then I would sue my former employers for harassment and I would almost certainly win. I had to take pills after a year of Oxford, so they wouldn't be able to lie their way out of it. Actually, I could still take them to court - the main obstacle being that three years after the fact is a bit late and much of what happened, the details that would be necessary for a case to go to court, has just been obliterated by time. : Smid ============================================== From: flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Kr|ger) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,alt.conspiracy,uk.media,uk.legal Subject: Re: Mike Corley - a (helpful) suggestion Date: Mon Oct 2 05:43:42 1995 In article <812551172snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk>, Snail <snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk> says: >Indeed, I feel that my Usenet access is censored simply because I don't want >to download groups he is partaking in, because of his behaviour. > >I wasn't that bothered, but I am starting to get seriously pissed off >with him. Which takes a lot. Hi Snail This person Corley seems quite interesting for three reasons. I put the following at the end of a post in another thread just to see if he was reading any other threads in uk.media. It seems he is probably not. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Heres an interesting little story from back in the early days of CCD technology. There was this miniature camera which was designed to fit behind the infrared receiver lens of the remote control system (just beside the IR sensor itself) the camera clocked out the data in 256 lines of 256 pixels from a Fairchild chip and fed it out, a line at a time, into the VBI within the TV set itself. The signal could be picked up remotely from a standard license detector van from where it was stripped out of the surrounding RF signal and relayed back to the TV station where it was displayed as a slowscan monochrome image in a corner of the news readers monitor. 1005 Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395936
  - 12
    - trouble calling my isapi extension Newbie question On XP PRO I have a small simple web page that will call into an ISAPI extension to be found in the same directory. In an html page I have a form I have: <form action="MyExtension.dll" method="POST"> that posts a request to my MyExtension.dll The browser returns with 405, and the error message "The page you are looking for cannot be displayed because the page address is incorrect. " but I know the dll is there any ideas about how I need to set up IIS? and the virtual directories? -- Gak - Finecats Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395935
  - 13
    - Logparser question. How do I make it find all events (errors) that just occured? Back to where there are none. An error triggers the event, then I want logparser to pull all Errors that just occured. Time_stamp? Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395933
  - 14
    - IIS5 site IP address question if server only has 1 ip address configured then there is no reason to configure a site on that server to specifically use that address (as opposed to "all unassigned"), correct? if the above configuration is in place, changing the site to "all unassigned" should have no impact (i.e; site restart), correct? Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395932
  - 15
    - Cached file problem I have the following directory structure \myrmc \mydal In each directory i have an aspx page with the same name mydata_sales.aspx I also have an XML file in each directory that is loaded up by the following code in the aspx page <asp:XmlDataSource ID="XmlDataSource1" runat="server" DataFile="XMLMenu.xml" ></asp:XmlDataSource> The contents of each xmlemnu.xml file is different depending on the directory. My problem is that it seems to be caching this xml file. If I go to myrmc\mydata_Sales.aspx first then no matter which directory you go into after that you see the XMLMENU.xml page from the myrmc directory. How do I get it to load the appropriate file within the directory? Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395930
  - 16
    - IIS6 migrated to another server, overwrote website info.... I have 2 Project Server 2003 servers, 1 for development and one for production. I was asked to migrate the IIS websites from the dev server to the prod server. I was not aware that a developer had configured some websites on the prod server ------when I migrated the websites to the prod server, it over wrote the websites and apparently, some config files. Is there a way to find the correct port # associated with PS2003 in Share Point Services on the prod server? OR, do I reload SPS? If I do that , will it disrupt the PS2003 software? Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395924
  - 17
    - Article ID 224364 Hello, I found an interesting Directory Listing asp code from http://support.microsoft.com/kb/q224364. It lists stuff perfect easy customisable.. But there is one problem. I want to exclude the Default.asp from listing in the directory listing. Someone knows how to edit this script, so it excludes Default.asp. Thanks in advance. Sjaak Roest Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395922
  - 18
    - XPPRO IIS5.1 Web Access I've developed a asp.net 2.0 application and I've been testing this iusing local. I wanted to set this up so I can use my XPPRO IIS5.1 as a Web Server. I've purchased a a router and a static IP Adress as well as a domain name. Are there any special requirements when setting up IIS5.1 to do this and I've seen a reference to "A Record". My ISP is Optus in Australia, although I purchased the dsn from a local hosting company. I simply wanted to developo a debug and test at my PC Anyway if there is existing documentation available to accomplish this, I'd appreciate some deirection on this. Kind REgards Bryan Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395920
  - 19
    - timeout / refreshing of the w3wp.exe*32 process ? when i connect to my webserver over http i see the creation of the process w3wp.exe*32 per user (each taking about 30mb ram). my app times out after 2 hours of inactivity using session cookies. but how to i control the timeout / refreshing of the w3wp.exe*32 process ? ... how do i recycle / kill the process when not used ? thanks for your time scott Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395919
  - 20
    - Error with .aspx extensions on Vista Hello. When I want to access an .aspx page on my IIS 7.0 server on Windows Vista, I get this error message (I don't get it when I use .htm pages) : Erreur HTTP 404.3 - Not Found Description : La page que vous avez demandée est introuvable en raison de la stratégie de mappage MIME (Multipurpose Internet Mail Extensions) configurée sur le serveur Web. La page que vous avez demandée possède une extension de nom de fichier non reconnue et non autorisée. Code d'erreur : 0x80070032 Notification : ExecuteRequestHandler Module : StaticFileModule URL demandée : http://localhost:80/test.aspx Chemin d'accès physique : E:\inetpub\wwwroot\test.aspx Session utilisateur : Anonyme Méthode d'ouverture de session : Anonyme Gestionnaire : StaticFile Thank you for your answers. Patrick Schevenels Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395915
  - 21
    - Logparser to parse IIS logs and output to (multiple) new files I just started reading about logparser and I would like to use it to rid IIS logs of entries containing bot names listed in a text file. I'll be using autoit and Logparser COM. I was wondering what the best way to go about this would be. From what I have read in the logparser documentation, it seems that the following would not be possible: 1. Logparser query cannot be setup such that: it is passed a file (say a list of bot names) and told to filter the inputfiles of all lines containing any of the terms in said file. 2. Logparser cannot produce output upon running a query on a set of multiple files such that the output is organized into files that correspond to the original files. (So if files A, B, C are to be filtered, the output cannot automatically be placed in files A1, B1, C1 such that the contents of A1 = filtered contents of A, and similarly for B1 and C1). Given the above assumptions, I have concluded that If I want to filter a large set of files and if the filtering involves a large set of filter terms, the best way to utilize logparser would be to run a query multiple times in nested loops (inner loop traverses the list of bots, and outer loop traverses the list of files. [In effect: For each file A, [for each filter term 'bot' run a query that retreives all lines NOT containing "bot", placing the output in A1. Repeat query on file A for all bots names] Repeat for all files]. I'd like to confirm whether or not my assumptions 1 and 2 above are mistaken, and if my suggested way of completing this task is over complicating things. Also any further tips or tool /scripting recommendations are most welcome. Thanks. Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395905
  - 22
    - IIS 6.0 ASP.NET 2.0 apps migrated to IIS 7 == "This web site is using .NET 1.1" I've migrated my development workstation from 32-bit Windows Server 2003 to Windows Vista Ultimate x64. I added my .NET web applications under development to IIS. I configured the apps to use a custom App Pool based on the Classic AppPool which is based on .NET 2.0. Now every time I open them in Visual Studio 2005, I get this message: ------------------------------------- The site 'http://localhost/[MyWeb]' is currently configured for use with ASP.NET 1.1.4322.2032. Microsoft Visual Studio has been designed for use with ASP.NET 2.0; if not configured some features may make incorrect assumptions, and pages designed with the tool may not render correctly. Would you like the site to be configured for use with ASP.NET 2.0? ------------------------------------- I don't know why it says this since the web site is not an ASP.NET 1.1 app. Regardless, if if I choose 'Yes', the messages come back again whenever I start up Visual Studio. How do I fix this? Thanks, Jon Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395901
  - 23
    - DNS Error/Proxy Error I'm having a little problem with my internet. I've been away for nine months and I went to use the internet, but whenever I try I get an error saying that there is a DNS error, or the proxy settings are wrong, thus making Internet explorer and Firefox to not work. I am connected to the network, and MSN Messenger signs itself in, yet iTunes Store cannot connect. What could have caused this, and how can I fix it? Great Thanks Michael. Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395898
  - 24
    - Web App Performance Hi, This seems like the right group for this question... We have an intranet based ASP web app. It is only used internally and the number of concurrent users is low(incidently how can I find out number of concurrent user?). Currently there is no performance monitoring at all. I know from SQL Profiler that some queries take 100ms, which is bad but not terrible given the low numbers of users. I know that the same web page can take between pretty instant to 5 seconds to return. I also know that on some pages with lots of data, the XSL Transform can take ages. However we think that most of the time is network latency. How can I monitor the following? Network latency. Time taken for page to load asp. Time taken for data islands and xmlhttp object to load data. Time for XSL transforms. Is there some way to monitor all this with Perf Mon? If so what counters do I need to look at and on which machine (client, web server, db server)? Any pointers to articles would be great as well... Am I even asking the right questions? Particularly I want to be able to show stats to prove if a slow network is the main bottleneck... Cheers, James MCDBA, MCSD Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395897
  - 25
    - IIS 6.0, memory limit ? Hi, I'm running IIS 6.0 with Win2003. 4GB of memory are installed on the machine. I've configured all the web sites to use the default applicaiton pool. each web sites occupies ~20MB. When the w3wp.exe process occupies 512MB of Heap bytes (checked with process explorer) I get OutOfMemory Exceptions from the web sites. Is there a limit to the amount of heap memoty that one pool process can occupy ? I haven't set any limits and using the default values. Gilad. Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395887
- Next
  - 1
    - IIS COM ASP.NET Hello, I have a web page that is developed in ASP.NET that accesses COM components. It was first developed on an XP Pro machine with IIS 5.1. There are never any problems running the web page on this machine. I then transferred the web page to the Windows 2003 server that has IIS 6.0. I can run the web page once and it runs fine. If I start a new instance of the web page, it gives me an error concerning one of the functions I have to use. The error is "System.Runtime.InteropServices.COMException (0x800A000D): Type mismatch". I have noticed also that it appears to be session related because if I use the same session id as the one that orignally worked in the url that it will work fine. Any ideas? Thanks. Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395874
  - 2
    - IIS Crashes - App Pool exceeded Time Limits during Shut down.. Have 20 sites running off 5 Mid-tiers ( four each). Each site allows users to look up files in Oracle that are stored on Network SANS. The sites crash randomly at different times and after manually recycling a site's app pool ( allowing the site to be accessed again) we find the following entry in the Event viewer App log A process serving application pool 'Philly' exceeded time limits during shut down. The process id was '3368'. This happens randomly across all sites. Servers are IIS6, W2k3 without SP1 or SP2 ( Other apps on servers won't support it) but most other indivdiual hot fixes are installed. On one site I attached IISSTATE to the w3wp.exe process and created the log file shown below. Since using IISSTATE we are finding that the sites are crashing a lot more often then previously thought. IISSTATE records these additional crashes by generating a dump file and we've found that a new worker process starts up for the site but the site does not become inaccessible and we don't see the entry in the App log previously mentioned. The log below is for a crash where the site became inaccessible and required a manual recycling of the app pool. Opened log file 'C:\iisstate\output\IISState-3368.log' *********************** Starting new log output IISState version 3.3.1 Tue Jun 19 10:34:16 2007 OS = Windows 2003 Server Executable: w3wp.exe PID = 3368 ( Philadelphia) Note: Thread times are formatted as HH:MM:SS.ms *********************** IIS has crashed... Beginning Analysis *** ERROR: Symbol file could not be found. Defaulted to export symbols for D:\Program Files\ePOWER32\Bin\epwfactivatorWeb.dll - DLL (!FunctionName) that failed: epwfactivatorWeb!DllCanUnloadNow Thread ID: 32 System Thread ID: 1428 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.140 User Time: 0:0:0.187 *** ERROR: Symbol file could not be found. Defaulted to export symbols for C:\WINDOWS\system32\MSWCRUN.DLL - Thread Type: ASP Executing Page: D:\PROGRAM FILES\EPOWER32\EPWFACTIVATOREEGD\EPWFACTIVATOR.ASP # ChildEBP RetAddr WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong. 00 073fe518 11115a4a epwfactivatorWeb!DllCanUnloadNow+0x1126c9 01 073fe56c 110bb82f epwfactivatorWeb!DllCanUnloadNow+0xdce8c 02 073fe5d4 110baa4a epwfactivatorWeb!DllCanUnloadNow+0x82c71 03 073fe69c 770f6109 epwfactivatorWeb!DllCanUnloadNow+0x81e8c 04 073fe6b4 7359a2fb OLEAUT32!DispCallFunc+0x15d 05 073ff010 73646772 MSVBVM60!EpiInvokeMethod+0x5a3 06 073ff050 736468e1 MSVBVM60!BASIC_DISPINTERFACE_Invoke+0x9d 07 073ff080 273bac38 MSVBVM60!EVENT_SINK_Invoke+0x54 08 073ff2f8 273b9e78 MSWCRUN!DllUnregisterDesigner+0x8ad3 09 073ff320 273b9ed6 MSWCRUN!DllUnregisterDesigner+0x7d13 0a 073ff37c 273bb1fc MSWCRUN!DllUnregisterDesigner+0x7d71 0b 073ff3b0 273bb10b MSWCRUN!DllUnregisterDesigner+0x9097 0c 073ff3dc 7348b427 MSWCRUN!DllUnregisterDesigner+0x8fa6 0d 073ff430 7347f39c vbscript!CatchIDispatchInvoke+0x46 0e 073ff47c 7346368c vbscript!IDispatchInvoke+0x95 0f 073ff590 73462f95 vbscript!InvokeDispatch+0x138 10 073ff5b4 734635ef vbscript!InvokeByName+0x40 11 073ff890 73463c33 vbscript!CScriptRuntime::Run+0x2625 12 073ff994 73463d42 vbscript!CScriptEntryPoint::Call+0x65 13 073ff9f8 73464081 vbscript!CSession::Execute+0xb6 14 073ffa48 734640ee vbscript!COleScript::ExecutePendingScripts+0x14a 15 073ffa64 709e50c4 vbscript!COleScript::SetScriptState+0x14e 16 073ffa90 709e510d asp!CActiveScriptEngine::TryCall+0x17 17 073ffacc 709e5142 asp!CActiveScriptEngine::Call+0x31 18 073ffae0 709e53dd asp!CallScriptFunctionOfEngine+0x21 19 073ffb18 709e553a asp!ExecuteRequest+0x138 1a 073ffb60 709e4969 asp!Execute+0x16a 1b 073ffbb0 709e4b09 asp!CHitObj::ViperAsyncCallback+0x3ec 1c 073ffbd0 7563306f asp!CViperAsyncRequest::OnCall+0x8c 1d 073ffbec 77204ebf comsvcs!CSTAActivityWork::STAActivityWorkHelper+0x30 1e 073ffc38 772055f2 ole32!EnterForCallback+0xc0 1f 073ffd98 771e0460 ole32!SwitchForCallback+0x194 20 073ffdc4 771a656c ole32!PerformCallback+0x52 21 073ffe48 77207c27 ole32!CObjectContext::InternalContextCallback+0x140 22 073ffe68 7563321b ole32!CObjectContext::DoCallback+0x1a 23 073ffed4 7563371e comsvcs!CSTAActivityWork::DoWork+0x137 24 073ffee8 75633f6a comsvcs!CSTAThread::DoWork+0x14 25 073fff04 75634234 comsvcs!CSTAThread::ProcessQueueWork+0x30 26 073fff84 77bc91ed comsvcs!CSTAThread::WorkerLoop+0x17a 27 073fffb8 77e6b7b6 msvcrt!_endthreadex+0x95 28 073fffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Closing open log file C:\iisstate\output\IISState-3368.log Opened log file 'C:\iisstate\output\IISState-3368.log' *********************** Starting new log output IISState version 3.3.1 Tue Jun 19 10:34:22 2007 OS = Windows 2003 Server Executable: w3wp.exe PID = 3368 Note: Thread times are formatted as HH:MM:SS.ms *********************** Thread ID: 0 System Thread ID: 1248 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.46 User Time: 0:0:0.62 Thread Type: HTTP Compression Thread # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0006fe58 77f43741 SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 0006fe5c 77e64073 ntdll!ZwWaitForSingleObject+0xc 02 0006fecc 77e63eae kernel32!WaitForSingleObjectEx+0xac 03 0006fedc 5a3635ae kernel32!WaitForSingleObject+0xf 04 0006feec 5a364d7d w3dt!WP_CONTEXT::RunMainThreadLoop+0xe 05 0006fef4 5a3a1d98 w3dt!UlAtqStartListen+0x2d 06 0006ff00 5a3a5d54 w3core!W3_SERVER::StartListen+0x8e 07 0006ff0c 010017af w3core!UlW3Start+0xea 08 0006ff44 0100195e w3wp!wmain+0x236 09 0006ffc0 77e73ba6 w3wp!wmainCRTStartup+0x12f 0a 0006fff0 00000000 kernel32!BaseProcessStart+0x23 Thread ID: 1 System Thread ID: 102c Kernel Time: 0:0:0.62 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 009fff9c 77f4262b SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 009fffa0 77f6b5b2 ntdll!NtDelayExecution+0xc 02 009fffb8 77e6b7b6 ntdll!RtlpTimerThread+0x45 03 009fffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 2 System Thread ID: 1014 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.31 Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 00a3ff70 77f430c7 SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 00a3ff74 77f7e6ae ntdll!ZwRemoveIoCompletion+0xc 02 00a3ffb8 77e6b7b6 ntdll!RtlpWorkerThread+0x3b 03 00a3ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 3 System Thread ID: 1120 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.46 User Time: 0:0:0.62 Thread Type: Possible ASP page. Possible DCOM activity Executing Page: Unable to locate ASP page No remote call being made # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 00a9fe20 77f4313f SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 00a9fe24 77c57b85 ntdll!NtReplyWaitReceivePortEx+0xc 02 00a9ff8c 77c60829 RPCRT4!LRPC_ADDRESS::ReceiveLotsaCalls+0x193 03 00a9ff90 77c60771 RPCRT4!RecvLotsaCallsWrapper+0x9 04 00a9ffb0 77c60857 RPCRT4!BaseCachedThreadRoutine+0x9c 05 00a9ffb8 77e6b7b6 RPCRT4!ThreadStartRoutine+0x17 06 00a9ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 4 System Thread ID: 100c Kernel Time: 0:0:0.15 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 00adff10 77f4262b SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 00adff14 77e64146 ntdll!NtDelayExecution+0xc 02 00adff7c 77e63f0d kernel32!SleepEx+0x68 03 00adff88 77162501 kernel32!Sleep+0xb 04 00adff94 771625ea ole32!CROIDTable::WorkerThreadLoop+0x12 05 00adff9c 77160000 ole32!CRpcThread::WorkerLoop+0x1e 06 00adffac 77162653 ole32!_imp__InstallApplication <PERF> (ole32+0x0) 07 00adffb8 77e6b7b6 ole32!CRpcThreadCache::RpcWorkerThreadEntry+0x1f 08 00adffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 5 System Thread ID: 1654 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.15 Thread Type: HTTP Listener # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 00c9ff28 77f430c7 SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 00c9ff2c 77e626a3 ntdll!ZwRemoveIoCompletion+0xc 02 00c9ff58 5a302360 kernel32!GetQueuedCompletionStatus+0x27 03 00c9ff90 5a302531 W3TP!THREAD_POOL_DATA::ThreadPoolThread+0x31 04 00c9ffa4 5a301d27 W3TP!THREAD_POOL_DATA::ThreadPoolThread+0x21 05 00c9ffb8 77e6b7b6 W3TP!THREAD_MANAGER::ThreadManagerThread+0x35 06 00c9ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 6 System Thread ID: 1760 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.421 User Time: 0:0:0.93 Thread Type: HTTP Listener # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 00cdff28 77f430c7 SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 00cdff2c 77e626a3 ntdll!ZwRemoveIoCompletion+0xc 02 00cdff58 5a302360 kernel32!GetQueuedCompletionStatus+0x27 03 00cdff90 5a302531 W3TP!THREAD_POOL_DATA::ThreadPoolThread+0x31 04 00cdffa4 5a301d27 W3TP!THREAD_POOL_DATA::ThreadPoolThread+0x21 05 00cdffb8 77e6b7b6 W3TP!THREAD_MANAGER::ThreadManagerThread+0x35 06 00cdffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 7 System Thread ID: b1c Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Type: HTTP Listener # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 00d1ff28 77f430c7 SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 00d1ff2c 77e626a3 ntdll!ZwRemoveIoCompletion+0xc 02 00d1ff58 5a302360 kernel32!GetQueuedCompletionStatus+0x27 03 00d1ff90 5a302531 W3TP!THREAD_POOL_DATA::ThreadPoolThread+0x31 04 00d1ffa4 5a301d27 W3TP!THREAD_POOL_DATA::ThreadPoolThread+0x21 05 00d1ffb8 77e6b7b6 W3TP!THREAD_MANAGER::ThreadManagerThread+0x35 06 00d1ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 8 System Thread ID: 1274 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.250 User Time: 0:0:0.93 Thread Type: HTTP Listener # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 00d5ff28 77f430c7 SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 00d5ff2c 77e626a3 ntdll!ZwRemoveIoCompletion+0xc 02 00d5ff58 5a302360 kernel32!GetQueuedCompletionStatus+0x27 03 00d5ff90 5a302531 W3TP!THREAD_POOL_DATA::ThreadPoolThread+0x31 04 00d5ffa4 5a301d27 W3TP!THREAD_POOL_DATA::ThreadPoolThread+0x21 05 00d5ffb8 77e6b7b6 W3TP!THREAD_MANAGER::ThreadManagerThread+0x35 06 00d5ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 9 System Thread ID: 11a8 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 00e1fcec 77f4372d SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 00e1fcf0 77f75297 ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 00e1ffb8 77e6b7b6 ntdll!RtlpWaitThread+0x158 03 00e1ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 10 System Thread ID: 1298 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Type: HTTP Compression Thread # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0168ff14 77f43741 SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 0168ff18 77e64073 ntdll!ZwWaitForSingleObject+0xc 02 0168ff88 77e63eae kernel32!WaitForSingleObjectEx+0xac 03 0168ff98 5a3a51f7 kernel32!WaitForSingleObject+0xf 04 0168ffb8 77e6b7b6 w3core!HTTP_COMPRESSION::CompressionThread+0x85 05 0168ffc4 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 11 System Thread ID: 16d0 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.31 User Time: 0:0:0.46 Thread Type: Possible ASP page. Possible DCOM activity Executing Page: Unable to locate ASP page No remote call being made # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 016cfe20 77f4313f SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 016cfe24 77c57b85 ntdll!NtReplyWaitReceivePortEx+0xc 02 016cff8c 77c60829 RPCRT4!LRPC_ADDRESS::ReceiveLotsaCalls+0x193 03 016cff90 77c60771 RPCRT4!RecvLotsaCallsWrapper+0x9 04 016cffb0 77c60857 RPCRT4!BaseCachedThreadRoutine+0x9c 05 016cffb8 77e6b7b6 RPCRT4!ThreadStartRoutine+0x17 06 016cffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 12 System Thread ID: 1750 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0170ff8c 77f4262b SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 0170ff90 77f6f0fc ntdll!NtDelayExecution+0xc 02 0170ffb8 77e6b7b6 ntdll!RtlpIOWorkerThread+0x3d 03 0170ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 13 System Thread ID: 1040 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Type: ASP Executing Page: Unable to locate ASP page # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0230ff14 77f43741 SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 0230ff18 77e64073 ntdll!ZwWaitForSingleObject+0xc 02 0230ff88 77e63eae kernel32!WaitForSingleObjectEx+0xac 03 0230ff98 70a01ce7 kernel32!WaitForSingleObject+0xf 04 0230ffb4 70a021fd asp!CApplnCleanupMgr::ApplnCleanupDoWork+0x19 05 0230ffb8 77e6b7b6 asp!CApplnCleanupMgr::ApplnCleanupThread+0xa 06 0230ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 14 System Thread ID: 1378 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: ASP Executing Page: Unable to locate ASP page # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0244fe1c 77f4372d SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 0244fe20 77e64664 ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 0244fec8 77d2d144 kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x11a 03 0244ff24 77d1de15 USER32!RealMsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x13f 04 0244ff40 70a11e85 USER32!MsgWaitForMultipleObjects+0x1d 05 0244ff80 77bbb9c3 asp!CMTACallbackThread::Thread+0x4c 06 0244ff8c 00000000 msvcrt!free+0xc8 Thread ID: 15 System Thread ID: 53c Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: ASP Executing Page: Unable to locate ASP page # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0248fe1c 77f4372d SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 0248fe20 77e64664 ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 0248fec8 77d2d144 kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x11a 03 0248ff24 77d1de15 USER32!RealMsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x13f 04 0248ff40 70a07e12 USER32!MsgWaitForMultipleObjects+0x1d 05 0248ff84 77bc90a2 asp!Debugger+0x9c 06 0248ffb8 77e6b7b6 msvcrt!_endthread+0xa6 07 0248ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 16 System Thread ID: b24 Kernel Time: 0:0:4.984 User Time: 0:0:3.968 *** ERROR: Symbol file could not be found. Defaulted to export symbols for C:\Program Files\Common Files\Microsoft Shared\VS7DEBUG\PDM.DLL - Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: PDM (Debugger) Thread. # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 024dfd84 77f4372d SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 024dfd88 77e64664 ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 024dfe30 77d2d144 kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x11a 03 024dfe8c 77d1de15 USER32!RealMsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x13f 04 024dfea8 5166694a USER32!MsgWaitForMultipleObjects+0x1d WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong. 05 024dff24 77e58b5f PDM!DllGetClassObject+0x30a2 06 00000000 00000000 kernel32!CreateSemaphoreW+0x5c Thread ID: 17 System Thread ID: 9d0 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Type: ASP Executing Page: Unable to locate ASP page # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0252fefc 77f43741 SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 0252ff00 77e64073 ntdll!ZwWaitForSingleObject+0xc 02 0252ff70 77e63eae kernel32!WaitForSingleObjectEx+0xac 03 0252ff80 709f1937 kernel32!WaitForSingleObject+0xf 04 0252ffb4 77f5cd6b asp!CViperReqManager::WatchThread+0x65 Thread ID: 18 System Thread ID: 1670 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.31 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Type: Idle ASP thread # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0298fef0 77f43741 SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 0298fef4 77e64073 ntdll!ZwWaitForSingleObject+0xc 02 0298ff64 77e63eae kernel32!WaitForSingleObjectEx+0xac 03 0298ff74 75630bd6 kernel32!WaitForSingleObject+0xf 04 0298ff84 77bc91ed comsvcs!CSTAThreadPool::LoadBalanceThreadControlLoop+0x25 05 0298ffb8 77e6b7b6 msvcrt!_endthreadex+0x95 06 0298ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 19 System Thread ID: 1250 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Type: Idle ASP thread # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 029cfee8 77f43741 SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 029cfeec 77e64073 ntdll!ZwWaitForSingleObject+0xc 02 029cff5c 77e63eae kernel32!WaitForSingleObjectEx+0xac 03 029cff6c 756306b5 kernel32!WaitForSingleObject+0xf 04 029cff84 77bc91ed comsvcs!CSTAThreadPool::KillThreadControlLoop+0x21 05 029cffb8 77e6b7b6 msvcrt!_endthreadex+0x95 06 029cffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 20 System Thread ID: 14d8 Kernel Time: 0:0:7.734 User Time: 0:0:5.343 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Idle ASP thread # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 02a0fdcc 77f4372d SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 02a0fdd0 77e64664 ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 02a0fe78 77d2d144 kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x11a 03 02a0fed4 77d1de15 USER32!RealMsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x13f 04 02a0fef0 7563429d USER32!MsgWaitForMultipleObjects+0x1d 05 02a0ff84 77bc91ed comsvcs!CSTAThread::WorkerLoop+0x1e3 06 02a0ffb8 77e6b7b6 msvcrt!_endthreadex+0x95 07 02a0ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 21 System Thread ID: 7d0 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.78 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Idle ASP thread # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 02adfdcc 77f4372d SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 02adfdd0 77e64664 ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 02adfe78 77d2d144 kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x11a 03 02adfed4 77d1de15 USER32!RealMsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x13f 04 02adfef0 7563429d USER32!MsgWaitForMultipleObjects+0x1d 05 02adff84 77bc91ed comsvcs!CSTAThread::WorkerLoop+0x1e3 06 02adffb8 77e6b7b6 msvcrt!_endthreadex+0x95 07 02adffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 22 System Thread ID: e48 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.609 User Time: 0:0:0.171 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Idle ASP thread # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 02b4fdcc 77f4372d SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 02b4fdd0 77e64664 ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 02b4fe78 77d2d144 kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x11a 03 02b4fed4 77d1de15 USER32!RealMsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x13f 04 02b4fef0 7563429d USER32!MsgWaitForMultipleObjects+0x1d 05 02b4ff84 77bc91ed comsvcs!CSTAThread::WorkerLoop+0x1e3 06 02b4ffb8 77e6b7b6 msvcrt!_endthreadex+0x95 07 02b4ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 23 System Thread ID: 1734 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.218 User Time: 0:0:0.171 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Idle ASP thread # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 02bbfdcc 77f4372d SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 02bbfdd0 77e64664 ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 02bbfe78 77d2d144 kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x11a 03 02bbfed4 77d1de15 USER32!RealMsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x13f 04 02bbfef0 7563429d USER32!MsgWaitForMultipleObjects+0x1d 05 02bbff84 77bc91ed comsvcs!CSTAThread::WorkerLoop+0x1e3 06 02bbffb8 77e6b7b6 msvcrt!_endthreadex+0x95 07 02bbffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 24 System Thread ID: 1544 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 047bfd44 77f4372d SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 047bfd48 77e64664 ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 047bfdf0 273bdd6b kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x11a WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong. 03 047bffb4 273bd919 MSWCRUN!DllUnregisterDesigner+0xbc06 04 047bffec 00000000 MSWCRUN!DllUnregisterDesigner+0xb7b4 Thread ID: 25 System Thread ID: 17c8 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.15 User Time: 0:0:0.0 *** WARNING: Unable to verify checksum for d:\program files\hummingbird\dm api\PCDClassBrokerIF.DLL *** ERROR: Symbol file could not be found. Defaulted to export symbols for d:\program files\hummingbird\dm api\PCDClassBrokerIF.DLL - Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0591fd3c 77f4372d SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 0591fd40 77e64664 ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 0591fde8 77d2d144 kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x11a 03 0591fe44 77d1de15 USER32!RealMsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x13f 04 0591fe60 057c4ab1 USER32!MsgWaitForMultipleObjects+0x1d WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong. 05 77d2d870 358b6456 PCDClassBrokerIF!SetClientMasterServer_Rundll+0x10c1 06 53ec8b55 00000000 0x358b6456 Thread ID: 26 System Thread ID: 14f0 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.15 User Time: 0:0:0.31 *** WARNING: Unable to verify checksum for d:\program files\hummingbird\dm api\PCDClient.dll *** ERROR: Symbol file could not be found. Defaulted to export symbols for d:\program files\hummingbird\dm api\PCDClient.dll - Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 058afed4 77f4262b SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 058afed8 77e64146 ntdll!NtDelayExecution+0xc 02 058aff40 77e63f0d kernel32!SleepEx+0x68 03 058aff4c 0570117e kernel32!Sleep+0xb WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong. 04 058affb4 77f5cd6b PCDClient+0x117e 05 058affb8 77e6b7b6 ntdll!CsrNewThread+0xb 06 058affc0 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 27 System Thread ID: a10 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.15 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 05a8fed0 77f43741 SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 05a8fed4 77e64073 ntdll!ZwWaitForSingleObject+0xc 02 05a8ff44 77e63eae kernel32!WaitForSingleObjectEx+0xac 03 05a8ff54 772141bd kernel32!WaitForSingleObject+0xf 04 05a8ff70 771e4c0f ole32!CDllHost::MTAWorkerLoop+0x27 05 05a8ff90 771bb472 ole32!CDllHost::WorkerThread+0xbf 06 05a8ff94 771625ea ole32!DLLHostThreadEntry+0x9 07 05a8ff9c 77160000 ole32!CRpcThread::WorkerLoop+0x1e 08 05a8ffac 77162653 ole32!_imp__InstallApplication <PERF> (ole32+0x0) 09 05a8ffb8 77e6b7b6 ole32!CRpcThreadCache::RpcWorkerThreadEntry+0x1f 0a 05a8ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 28 System Thread ID: c54 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.62 User Time: 0:0:0.31 Thread Type: Possible ASP page. Possible DCOM activity Executing Page: Unable to locate ASP page No remote call being made # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0732fe20 77f4313f SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 0732fe24 77c57b85 ntdll!NtReplyWaitReceivePortEx+0xc 02 0732ff8c 77c60829 RPCRT4!LRPC_ADDRESS::ReceiveLotsaCalls+0x193 03 0732ff90 77c60771 RPCRT4!RecvLotsaCallsWrapper+0x9 04 0732ffb0 77c60857 RPCRT4!BaseCachedThreadRoutine+0x9c 05 0732ffb8 77e6b7b6 RPCRT4!ThreadStartRoutine+0x17 06 0732ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 29 System Thread ID: e94 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0484ff70 77f430c7 SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 0484ff74 77f7e6ae ntdll!ZwRemoveIoCompletion+0xc 02 0484ffb8 77e6b7b6 ntdll!RtlpWorkerThread+0x3b 03 0484ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 30 System Thread ID: 97c Kernel Time: 0:0:0.15 User Time: 0:0:0.15 Thread Status: Thread is in a WAIT state. Thread Type: Idle ASP thread # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 06dffdcc 77f4372d SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 06dffdd0 77e64664 ntdll!NtWaitForMultipleObjects+0xc 02 06dffe78 77d2d144 kernel32!WaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x11a 03 06dffed4 77d1de15 USER32!RealMsgWaitForMultipleObjectsEx+0x13f 04 06dffef0 7563429d USER32!MsgWaitForMultipleObjects+0x1d 05 06dfff84 77bc91ed comsvcs!CSTAThread::WorkerLoop+0x1e3 06 06dfffb8 77e6b7b6 msvcrt!_endthreadex+0x95 07 06dfffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 31 System Thread ID: e10 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0739ff70 77f430c7 SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 0739ff74 77f7e6ae ntdll!ZwRemoveIoCompletion+0xc 02 0739ffb8 77e6b7b6 ntdll!RtlpWorkerThread+0x3b 03 0739ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 32 System Thread ID: 1428 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.140 User Time: 0:0:0.187 Thread Type: ASP Executing Page: D:\PROGRAM FILES\EPOWER32\EPWFACTIVATOREEGD\EPWFACTIVATOR.ASP # ChildEBP RetAddr WARNING: Stack unwind information not available. Following frames may be wrong. 00 073fe518 11115a4a epwfactivatorWeb!DllCanUnloadNow+0x1126c9 01 073fe56c 110bb82f epwfactivatorWeb!DllCanUnloadNow+0xdce8c 02 073fe5d4 110baa4a epwfactivatorWeb!DllCanUnloadNow+0x82c71 03 073fe69c 770f6109 epwfactivatorWeb!DllCanUnloadNow+0x81e8c 04 073fe6b4 7359a2fb OLEAUT32!DispCallFunc+0x15d 05 073ff010 73646772 MSVBVM60!EpiInvokeMethod+0x5a3 06 073ff050 736468e1 MSVBVM60!BASIC_DISPINTERFACE_Invoke+0x9d 07 073ff080 273bac38 MSVBVM60!EVENT_SINK_Invoke+0x54 08 073ff2f8 273b9e78 MSWCRUN!DllUnregisterDesigner+0x8ad3 09 073ff320 273b9ed6 MSWCRUN!DllUnregisterDesigner+0x7d13 0a 073ff37c 273bb1fc MSWCRUN!DllUnregisterDesigner+0x7d71 0b 073ff3b0 273bb10b MSWCRUN!DllUnregisterDesigner+0x9097 0c 073ff3dc 7348b427 MSWCRUN!DllUnregisterDesigner+0x8fa6 0d 073ff430 7347f39c vbscript!CatchIDispatchInvoke+0x46 0e 073ff47c 7346368c vbscript!IDispatchInvoke+0x95 0f 073ff590 73462f95 vbscript!InvokeDispatch+0x138 10 073ff5b4 734635ef vbscript!InvokeByName+0x40 11 073ff890 73463c33 vbscript!CScriptRuntime::Run+0x2625 12 073ff994 73463d42 vbscript!CScriptEntryPoint::Call+0x65 13 073ff9f8 73464081 vbscript!CSession::Execute+0xb6 14 073ffa48 734640ee vbscript!COleScript::ExecutePendingScripts+0x14a 15 073ffa64 709e50c4 vbscript!COleScript::SetScriptState+0x14e 16 073ffa90 709e510d asp!CActiveScriptEngine::TryCall+0x17 17 073ffacc 709e5142 asp!CActiveScriptEngine::Call+0x31 18 073ffae0 709e53dd asp!CallScriptFunctionOfEngine+0x21 19 073ffb18 709e553a asp!ExecuteRequest+0x138 1a 073ffb60 709e4969 asp!Execute+0x16a 1b 073ffbb0 709e4b09 asp!CHitObj::ViperAsyncCallback+0x3ec 1c 073ffbd0 7563306f asp!CViperAsyncRequest::OnCall+0x8c 1d 073ffbec 77204ebf comsvcs!CSTAActivityWork::STAActivityWorkHelper+0x30 1e 073ffc38 772055f2 ole32!EnterForCallback+0xc0 1f 073ffd98 771e0460 ole32!SwitchForCallback+0x194 20 073ffdc4 771a656c ole32!PerformCallback+0x52 21 073ffe48 77207c27 ole32!CObjectContext::InternalContextCallback+0x140 22 073ffe68 7563321b ole32!CObjectContext::DoCallback+0x1a 23 073ffed4 7563371e comsvcs!CSTAActivityWork::DoWork+0x137 24 073ffee8 75633f6a comsvcs!CSTAThread::DoWork+0x14 25 073fff04 75634234 comsvcs!CSTAThread::ProcessQueueWork+0x30 26 073fff84 77bc91ed comsvcs!CSTAThread::WorkerLoop+0x17a 27 073fffb8 77e6b7b6 msvcrt!_endthreadex+0x95 28 073fffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 33 System Thread ID: ce0 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0747ff70 77f430c7 SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 0747ff74 77f7e6ae ntdll!ZwRemoveIoCompletion+0xc 02 0747ffb8 77e6b7b6 ntdll!RtlpWorkerThread+0x3b 03 0747ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 34 System Thread ID: e2c Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 074bff70 77f430c7 SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 074bff74 77f7e6ae ntdll!ZwRemoveIoCompletion+0xc 02 074bffb8 77e6b7b6 ntdll!RtlpWorkerThread+0x3b 03 074bffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 Thread ID: 35 System Thread ID: 1218 Kernel Time: 0:0:0.0 User Time: 0:0:0.0 Thread Type: Other # ChildEBP RetAddr 00 0755ff18 77f43741 SharedUserData!SystemCallStub+0x4 01 0755ff1c 77e64073 ntdll!ZwWaitForSingleObject+0xc 02 0755ff8c 77162612 kernel32!WaitForSingleObjectEx+0xac 03 0755ff9c 77160000 ole32!CRpcThread::WorkerLoop+0x58 04 0755ffac 77162653 ole32!_imp__InstallApplication <PERF> (ole32+0x0) 05 0755ffb8 77e6b7b6 ole32!CRpcThreadCache::RpcWorkerThreadEntry+0x1f 06 0755ffec 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+0x34 ***** Dump name is formatted as: PID-Timestamp.dmp Creating C:\iisstate\output\3368-1182274474.dmp - mini user dump ***** Closing open log file C:\iisstate\output\IISState-3368.log Any Idea as to what may be causing this crash? I can provide more configuration Info if needed. Any help at all would be appreciated. We are rather desperate. Thank you in advance. Danfall Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395872
  - 3
    - How to move a website from the default website Hi experts, I have WSS installed which has disabled my default website and stolen port 80 for it's own selfish purposes. Now, I recently have installed the web version of the terminal services server which installed it right off of the "stopped" default website. I cant start the default website w/o harming my sharepoint install, so how do I go about moving this web based terminal server to another location on my IIS6 server or port to recitify this issue? Thanks! Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395870
  - 4
    - MSKB article on memory & perf counter issues There's a really good MS Knowledge Base article which describes how to debug memory utilization related performance problems ( I believe it's for IIS / web-apps, but not sure), specifically sets of perf counters to use, what each one does, and how they interrelate. I can no longer find this article searchs MSKB. Does anyone have a link to it somewhere on the web ? Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395866
  - 5
    - iis log files not being written On IIS6 WS03 , what could causes temporary inability of iis to write to its log files ? Could memory or cpu load cause such an occurrence ? Is it possible that some other process besides the w3wp hosting iis could obtain a lock on the log files ( is the iis w3wp hoting other apps ) ? Something else ? The web app continues to function (albeit slowly) but expected log entries are missing Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395865
  - 6
    - Intranet Setup Hi, I am trying to pulish intranet site but i am so lost. I need help. Can anyone tell me how to set up login box when users try to open intranet site? Op is windows xp. Do i say how to configure ????? this is a first time i am doing this..... For instance,I visited some company intranet site, and login box appeared. I would like to make my intranet site just like that. what do i have to do? Thanks in advance. Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395864
  - 7
    - Installing IIS on XP Pro I am trying to install IIS and Message Queuing on XP Pro. When I go to Add Windows Components there is no listing of IIS. The only components showing are Networking Services and Other Network File and Print Services. How do I make IIS and Message Queuing appear as a selection? I have tried with and without the XP disk. Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395861
  - 8
    - IIS doen't show any thing Hi, I've a pc XP-SP2, I've activated IIS, but when I open IIS interface it doesn't show anything. PS: i log to the PC with a user which is part of Aministrators, but when I display the USERS (control panel) it doesn't display any user) Any help please. Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395859
  - 9
    - Form help I get this message after filling out our form on our site - Can someone help please While processing the form you just filled out, we came across a problem. Details: The site which refered you to this script is not allowed access to this script.asiwebpage.com A possible solution is lowering the privacy levels on your firewall, or stopping it, while you fill in this form. Please contact the webmaster of the site. Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395857
  - 10
    - IIS 6 File replace and caching If I replace a file in a virtual directory, public access still is using the old version. Is this to do with caching? How can I reset the cache per directory? Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395854
  - 11
    - New China Sex Hotline! free to listen live.. +86 13925265554 Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395851
  - 12
    - New China Sex Hotline! free to listen live.. +86 13925265554 Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395850
  - 13
    - IIS Crash on Microsoft ASP page (.NET 2.0) We are running Microsoft Small Business Server R2. We have many of these servers installed and are only experiencing this issue on one. The problem is that when going to the Remote Web Workplace we get a .NET unhandled exception. I've run IIS Debug Diag and received the following dump and am looking for some help. Analysis Summary Type Description Recommendation Error In w3wp__PID__7652__Date__06_19_2007__Time_11_40_10AM__80__Second_Chance_Exception_E0434F4D.dmp the assembly instruction at kernel32!RaiseException+53 in C:\WINDOWS\system32\kernel32.dll from Microsoft Corporation has caused an unknown exception (0xe0434f4d) on thread 14 This exception originated from mscorwks!RaiseTheExceptionInternalOnly+226. Review the faulting call stack for thread 14 to determine root cause for the exception. Please follow up with vendor Microsoft Corporation for problem resolution concerning the following file: C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\mscorwks.dll. Information DebugDiag determined that this dump file (w3wp__PID__7652__Date__06_19_2007__Time_11_40_10AM__80__Second_Chance_Exception_E0434F4D.dmp) is a crash dump and did not perform any hang analysis. If you wish to enable combined crash and hang analysis for crash dumps, edit the IISAnalysis.asp script (located in the DebugDiag\Scripts folder) and set the g_DoCombinedAnalysis constant to True. Analysis Details Table Of Contents w3wp__PID__7652__Date__06_19_2007__Time_11_40_10AM__80__Second_Chance_Exception_E0434F4D.dmp Faulting Thread Faulting Module Information Report for w3wp__PID__7652__Date__06_19_2007__Time_11_40_10AM__80__Second_Chance_Exception_E0434F4D.dmp Type of Analysis Performed Crash Analysis Machine Name SERVER Operating System Windows Server 2003 Service Pack 2 Number Of Processors 2 Process ID 7652 Process Image c:\WINDOWS\system32\inetsrv\w3wp.exe System Up-Time 0 day(s) 09:20:12 Process Up-Time 0 day(s) 00:00:45 Thread 14 - System ID 7176 Entry point mscorwks!ThreadpoolMgr::intermediateThreadProc Create time 6/19/2007 11:39:26 AM Time spent in user mode 0 Days 0:0:0.0 Time spent in kernel mode 0 Days 0:0:0.15 Function Arg 1 Arg 2 Arg 3 Source kernel32!RaiseException+53 e0434f4d 00000001 00000001 mscorwks!RaiseTheExceptionInternalOnly+226 01f09290 00000000 00000000 mscorwks!RaiseTheException+4c 01f09290 00000000 01cffbf8 mscorwks!RaiseTheException+be 00000000 0ec309e0 9695272b mscorwks!RealCOMPlusThrow+37 01f09290 00000000 7a0e0701 mscorwks!RealCOMPlusThrow+a 01f09290 955af301 7a36a7d0 mscorwks!Thread::RaiseCrossContextException+63 00000000 01cffca8 01cffd18 mscorwks!Thread::DoADCallBack+26c 00000002 79f3a0a1 01cffe18 mscorwks!Thread::UserResumeThread+e1 01cffe18 01cffdc4 79f93fe6 mscorwks!Thread::DoADCallBack+355 01cffe18 955af109 0ec309e0 mscorwks!Thread::DoADCallBack+541 01cffe18 00000002 00000000 mscorwks!Thread::DoADCallBack+575 00000002 7a07bdfe 01cffe6c mscorwks!ManagedThreadBase::ThreadPool+13 00000002 7a07bdfe 01cffe6c mscorwks!BindIoCompletionCallbackStubEx+8c 00000079 00000000 01eec464 mscorwks!BindIoCompletionCallbackStub+13 00000079 00000000 01eec464 mscorwks!ThreadpoolMgr::CompletionPortThreadStart+406 00000000 00000000 b6da3d08 mscorwks!ThreadpoolMgr::intermediateThreadProc+49 000cd9a8 00000000 00000000 kernel32!BaseThreadStart+34 79f710dd 000cd9a8 00000000 In w3wp__PID__7652__Date__06_19_2007__Time_11_40_10AM__80__Second_Chance_Exception_E0434F4D.dmp the assembly instruction at kernel32!RaiseException+53 in C:\WINDOWS\system32\kernel32.dll from Microsoft Corporation has caused an unknown exception (0xe0434f4d) on thread 14 This exception originated from mscorwks!RaiseTheExceptionInternalOnly+226. Module Information Image Name: C:\WINDOWS\system32\kernel32.dll Symbol Type: PDB Base address: 0x77e40000 Time Stamp: Wed Apr 18 10:25:36 2007 Checksum: 0x001083fc Comments: COM DLL: False Company Name: Microsoft Corporation ISAPIExtension: False File Description: Windows NT BASE API Client DLL ISAPIFilter: False File Version: 5.2.3790.4062 (srv03_sp2_gdr.070417-0203) Managed DLL: False Internal Name: kernel32 VB DLL: False Legal Copyright: Â© Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. Loaded Image Name: kernel32.dll Legal Trademarks: Mapped Image Name: Original filename: kernel32 Module name: kernel32 Private Build: Single Threaded: False Product Name: MicrosoftÂ® WindowsÂ® Operating System Module Size: 1.01 MBytes Product Version: 5.2.3790.4062 Symbol File Name: c:\symcache\kernel32.pdb\7FD4C98964054C24B2C472948D829DF52\kernel32.pdb Special Build: & Script Summary Script Name Status Error Code Error Source Error Description Source Line IISAnalysis.asp Completed Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395836
  - 14
    - Post ASP page as static HTML Hello everyone! I am working on a website where the initial ASP (classic) page request is very high (50,000 per hour) - and is dynamically generated on every request - as there is the usuall stuff in there Server,CreateObject, etc it is creating a big overhead on the server - but i've seen quite a few sites now where the initial page is HTML, and has obviously been generated as a "blanket" page... My question is this - if my page changes content every 1 hour - is there an easy way of creating a default .HTML version that doesn't have any database overhead that I can serve to reduce the hit on my IIS and SQL server? many thanks Steve Parker Systems Architect http://www.extraksoftware.com Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395834
  - 15
    - Impersonation not working... Hi all, Hopefully someone will be able to help with this issue. I have an ASP.Net application that is trying to extract frames from .avi and .wmv files to create thumbnails. The media files are out on a server and the .avi files work when I set the filename property of the MediaDet object but when I try to do that with the .wmv file I get an error thrown at me. The files all sit in the same directory and are processed in the same loop of code. I'm using impersonation and the Windows Identity shows that the impersonated user is being used before the code tries to set the filename property. I decided to Audit the directory on the server and also check the windows Identity before the setting of the filename property on the MediaDet object. For the .avi and .wmv files the Windows Identity is as follows... {System.Security.Principal.WindowsIdentity} AuthenticationType: "Kerberos" Groups: {System.Security.Principal.IdentityReferenceCollection} ImpersonationLevel: Impersonation {3} IsAnonymous: False IsAuthenticated: True IsGuest: False IsSystem: False Name: "MYDOMAIN\MYUSER" Owner: {System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier} Token: 1252 User: {System.Security.Principal.SecurityIdentifier} ...as you can see the user name is "MYUSER" which is who I'm impersonating in the web config file. Now when the error is thrown the Security log ends up with 2 entries... Security Error 1: Logon attempt by: MICROSOFT_AUTHENTICATION_PACKAGE_V1_0 Logon account: ASPNET Source Workstation: WORKSTATIONNAME Error Code: 0xC000006A Security Error 2: Logon Failure: Reason: Unknown user name or bad password User Name: ASPNET Domain: DOMAINNAME Logon Type: 3 Logon Process: NtLmSsp Authentication Package: NTLM Workstation Name: WORKSTATIONNAME Caller User Name: - Caller Domain: - Caller Logon ID: - Caller Process ID: - Transited Services: - Source Network Address: 10.0.0.26 Source Port: 0 ...So why on earth is the ASPNET account being used for the .wmv file and not the MYUSER user. It's like impersonation gets used for the .avi files but not for the .wmv file. Very very weird. Does anyone have any ideas? Thanks in advance for any help. Cheers, Mike Gorgone Senior Software Engineer PictureU Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395833
  - 16
    - Viewing images on different server For some reason, I cannot see images from my internet web site. I have the images in a virtual directory and located on a different server on our domain in a shared folder. When I view them from my workstation in the office, they show up fine. If I connect via a VPN I only get the red X on the images and not the picture. What do I need to do? Thanks. p.s. I am using ASP.Net 2.0 David Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395831
  - 17
    - IIS7 for Borland Developer Studio 2006 Hi, A few months ago I tried everything I could to get BDS2006 to access IIS7 with no success (debugger wouldn't work). Any new hints for Vista Ultimate final x64? It seems to have both IIS6 and IIS7 installed and all versions of .Net Framework (ie. 1, 2 and 3), but I know BDS will use 1.1. Thanks in advance. Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395829
  - 18
    - IIS custom errors stop working after adding web.config We have an IIS 6.0 server running mostly classic ASP applications and use custom errors configured in IIS manager. However, recently we added a few ASP.NET applications to the server and use a web.config file at the root of the site for all of the .NET inherit their connections strings. After adding these .NET applications, the custom error pages for classic ASP apps no longer work. I know that you can configure a web.config with tags for custom errors but does that, by default, override the custom errors configured in IIS. Can you have IIS custom errors and web.config custom error coexisting on the same machine? Thanks for any advice you can offer. Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395828
  - 19
    - IIS 6 HTTP 400 Bad Request Error Dear peoples, At our organisation we are using a program called My@VO. This is running on a w2k3 server (SP1) with IIS 6. We have a website maintained by My@VO within IIS. If I type the name of the website at internet explorer all things are correct. But if I type localhost or http://127.0.0.1 then I get HTTP 400 Bad Request Error. (this is all on the server) If I go on a workstation and type in the IP of the server I also get HTTP 400 Bad Request Error. At the hosts-file on the server is 127.0.0.1 localhost 127.0.0.1 <site-name> If anyone knows how to fix this problem that would be great. Yours sincerely, Noel Heesen *** Sent via Developersdex http://www.developersdex.com *** Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395825
  - 20
    - Problem uploading big files with IIS 6.0 Hi we have a Dell W2K3 R2 Web Edition with 2 Gb of RAM. we have problems when trying to upload big files to server, the bigest file we could upload was around 50 Mb and we need to upload bigger ones. We have tried with several components, like aspsmartupload. Our Metabase settings are AspMaxRequestEntityAllowed 1073741824 AspQueueTimeout 4294967295 (unlimited) AspBufferingOn set 1 Script timeout is set to 900 seconds but it crash before that. It seems to be similar to "FIX: The Response.BinaryWrite method fails when you use it to send files that are larger than 20 MB" (http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;826756) but our ASP.dll version is newer. We also check "You may receive a 403 error when you use an ASP request to upload a large file in Internet Information Services" (http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx/kb/327659/en-us) even we didn't get a 403 error message Server logs display ASP_0101_:_80004005|Unexpected_error Any idea about what can we try next? Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395823
  - 21
    - IIS download I am working on an SDK that requires that I have IIS5 installed (or a lter version I assume). Where do I download it? I have an MSDN parter subscription. Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395822
  - 22
    - Changing IP's Hello I have 260 websites on a server and now the Internet people are making me change my IP. I would like to change the sites to to "All Unssigned" the easiest way possible. Is there a way to do this???? Thanks! Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395807
  - 23
    - Opening up .DOT templates in IE from an intranet Hi, not sure what forum this goes under but i'll give this a try. If create an intranet web page with a standard link to file://somewordtemplate.dot the template itself comes up previewed in the Browser. what I want is for a new document to open based on this Word template. this is what happens i find somewordtemplate.dot on the fileshare through Explorer and double-click on it. Is this possible? thanks. -mocity Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395806
  - 24
    - I published a local web. Does it have an IP address? I published a page I can see in I.E. if I go to c:\inetpub\wwwroot\XXXX.html. Is there any way I can see this page on the WWW? (Note this is published directly on my w2k pro workstation. I have comcast 3 way with no router. How can I find out my IP address? there are no IIS items showing in Admin tools and no IIS standalone snap ins in MMC that I can see. I got all the updates available I think for w2k pro workstation and FrontPage 2000 How can I tell if IIS is running? Also How do In change my name displayed? I am not "Internet Explorer user Gets..." Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395805
  - 25
    - Is it possible to install IIS on W2K Pro (workstation not server)? Is it possible to install IIS on W2K Pro (workstation not server)? What am I doing wrong? See my other posts below. Thanks Tag: Can't see my own port 8080 Tag: 395804

Folks can see my webserver on port 8080 from the internet. I cannot
see it myself. Is that weird or am I missing something? Thx in
advance for any advice!

Top

Re: Can't see my own port 8080 by Dave

Dave
Sat Jun 23 10:58:21 CDT 2007

you are missing something

"Darksong" <nguyenalext@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:1182595218.547517.317550@k79g2000hse.googlegroups.com...
> Folks can see my webserver on port 8080 from the internet. I cannot
> see it myself. Is that weird or am I missing something? Thx in
> advance for any advice!
>

Top

Re: Can't see my own port 8080 by Kristofer

Kristofer
Sun Jun 24 03:39:34 CDT 2007

How is everything set up? Is IIS running on port 8080, or do you have port
forwarding from 8080 to 80, and IIS is running on port 80?

Does your router (if any) have loop back capabilities?

--
Regards,
Kristofer Gafvert
http://www.gafvert.info/iis/ - IIS Related Info

Darksong wrote:

>Folks can see my webserver on port 8080 from the internet. I cannot
>see it myself. Is that weird or am I missing something? Thx in
>advance for any advice!

Top

Re: Can't see my own port 8080 by Darksong

Darksong
Mon Jun 25 18:33:26 CDT 2007

Hi -
Port 8080 is the port being used by the webserver and the router port
forwards to the machine's internal IP address at that port.

I'm not sure if loopback is a capability of the router. I don't see
anything that mentions it unless Netgear calls it something else.
(Netgear WGR614v6). Do you think that's an issue?

On Jun 24, 4:39 am, "Kristofer Gafvert" <kgafv...@NEWSilopia.com>
wrote:
> How is everything set up? Is IIS running on port 8080, or do you have port
> forwarding from 8080 to 80, and IIS is running on port 80?
>
> Does your router (if any) have loop back capabilities?
>
> --
> Regards,
> Kristofer Gafverthttp://www.gafvert.info/iis/- IIS Related Info
>
>
>
> Darksong wrote:
> >Folks can see my webserver on port 8080 from the internet. I cannot
> >see it myself. Is that weird or am I missing something? Thx in
> >advance for any advice!- Hide quoted text -
>
> - Show quoted text -

Top

Re: Can't see my own port 8080 by Kristofer

Kristofer
Tue Jun 26 00:22:38 CDT 2007

If you can use http://localhost:8080/ to access the website from the
server itself, but you cannot use an external name or IP address from
within your internal network, then i do think it is a networking problem
and likely the router does not support loop back.

--
Regards,
Kristofer Gafvert
http://www.gafvert.info/iis/ - IIS Related Info

Darksong wrote:

>Hi -
>Port 8080 is the port being used by the webserver and the router port
>forwards to the machine's internal IP address at that port.
>
>I'm not sure if loopback is a capability of the router. I don't see
>anything that mentions it unless Netgear calls it something else.
>(Netgear WGR614v6). Do you think that's an issue?
>
>
>
>On Jun 24, 4:39 am, "Kristofer Gafvert" <kgafv...@NEWSilopia.com>
>wrote:
>>How is everything set up? Is IIS running on port 8080, or do you have port
>>forwarding from 8080 to 80, and IIS is running on port 80?
>>
>>Does your router (if any) have loop back capabilities?
>>
>>--
>>Regards,
>>Kristofer Gafverthttp://www.gafvert.info/iis/- IIS Related Info
>>
>>
>>
>>Darksong wrote:
>>>Folks can see my webserver on port 8080 from the internet. I cannot
>>>see it myself. Is that weird or am I missing something? Thx in
>>>advance for any advice!- Hide quoted text -
>>
>>- Show quoted text -

Top

Re: Can't see my own port 8080 by Darksong

Darksong
Wed Jun 27 08:16:07 CDT 2007

This may be unrelated but I thought it would be worth mentioning:

Over the course of the last week folks (including myself) started
noticing that we were not able to hit my site from an external source
(in addition to the originally posted issue of not being able to
connect to the external address from inside the network).

I'm in Northern Virginia with Cox as the ISP. Possibly port 8080 is
now being blocked as well as 80? I changed the port number and all is
well again.

On Jun 26, 1:22 am, "Kristofer Gafvert" <kgafv...@NEWSilopia.com>
wrote:
> If you can usehttp://localhost:8080/to access the website from the
> server itself, but you cannot use an external name or IP address from
> within your internal network, then i do think it is a networking problem
> and l