gerry
Sun Feb 05 01:04:48 CST 2006
'suffer' ???
no misconceptions here - I couldn't care less what's 'under the hood' - if I
don't have code it then that's native enough for me.
"Lloyd Dupont" <net.galador@ld> wrote in message
news:eYb5wOeKGHA.1832@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> It's not included 'natively' in the .NET framework.
> But I think you suffer from some misconception.
> Include 'natively' in the .NET framework usually mean plenty of interop
> under the hood.
>
> "gerry" <germ@canada.com> wrote in message
> news:euF9chbKGHA.3732@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
> > Thanks christopher , I had already found those links among others.
> > I was more interested in whether or not this was something that had been
> > included natively in the framework and I just wasn't finding it.
> >
> > thanks again
> >
> >
> > "Christopher Reed" <carttu@nospam.nospam> wrote in message
> > news:#FM5gEZKGHA.2808@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> >> Try these:
> >>
> >>
http://www.codeproject.com/csharp/DotNetNamedPipesPart1.asp
> >>
http://www.codeproject.com/csharp/DotNetNamedPipesPart2.asp
> >>
> >> These articles are using .NET 1.1, but the code, for the most part,
> >> should
> >> work with .NET 2.0.
> >>
> >> Also, do a Google search on "named pipes" and ".net framework".
> >> --
> >> Christopher A. Reed
> >> "The oxen are slow, but the earth is patient."
> >>
> >> "gerry" <germ@canada.com> wrote in message
> >> news:Ou0yDMYKGHA.344@TK2MSFTNGP11.phx.gbl...
> >> > Hi ,
> >> > using .net 2.0 / vs 2005 I need to do some work with named pipes.
> >> > After a few quick googles and some looking through the msdn docs I
> >> > looks
> >> > like this would still be done via interop.
> >> > Before I put any time into this I thought I would verify that this is
> >> > true,
> >> > or is there something in the 2.0 framework for dealing with named
pipes
> >> > that
> >> > I've missed ?
> >> >
> >> > thanks
> >> > Gerry
> >> >
> >> >
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>
>