Alvin
Wed Jun 29 17:34:31 CDT 2005
Not necessarily not recommended. I've seen it go horribly wrong at one
company I worked. After a few hours of running fine, the cache update
suddenly started taking 15minutes to return data. I didn't look into the
reason why so I don't exactly know why it was misbehaving. I just thought I
would point it.
--
Regards,
Alvin Bruney - ASP.NET MVP
[Shameless Author Plug]
The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET
Now available @ www.lulu.com/owc, Amazon.com etc
<param@community.nospam> wrote in message
news:%23AqmBGLfFHA.484@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> Why do you say it had disastrous results? Please shed some light on why
> this method is not recommended.
>
> thanks
>
> "Alvin Bruney [MVP - ASP.NET]" <www.lulu.com/owc> wrote in message
> news:%23ggahBEfFHA.572@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>> Ok, how about storing the cache in the service itself as a static object
>> or static hashtable. As long as the service is running, the objects will
>> be avialable and you can call into the service to set and get data. I'd
>> be concerned about the performance though as I have seen this implemented
>> with disasterous results.
>>
>> --
>> Regards,
>> Alvin Bruney - ASP.NET MVP
>>
>> [Shameless Author Plug]
>> The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET
>> Now available @ www.lulu.com/owc, Amazon.com etc
>> <param@community.nospam> wrote in message
>> news:enRF5g$eFHA.2888@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
>>> Alvin, what I was getting at was I want to cache data from a database in
>>> memory of the application server. I intend on having remotable objects
>>> running on an app server that access the sql database. These objects
>>> will not be hosted in IIS, rather through a custom service listener. So
>>> I believe I will not have access to the asp.net cache objects. Everytime
>>> a client makes a call to the remote object an instance will be created
>>> and destroyed. So even if i declared a common member hashtable and used
>>> it as a cache to store frequently accessed data that will not work. Any
>>> suggestions?
>>>
>>> TIA
>>>
>>> "Alvin Bruney [MVP - ASP.NET]" <www.lulu.com/owc> wrote in message
>>> news:uT7d$A4eFHA.1612@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
>>>> You can use the database, stateserver, a file etc. It may help to
>>>> assign the serializeable attribute to your classes to help with the
>>>> serialization/deserialization process.
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alvin Bruney - ASP.NET MVP
>>>>
>>>> [Shameless Author Plug]
>>>> The Microsoft Office Web Components Black Book with .NET
>>>> Now available @ www.lulu.com/owc, Amazon.com etc
>>>> <param@community.nospam> wrote in message
>>>> news:%23j$C86zeFHA.3076@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>>>>> Hi all, I am working on a component dll that could either br running
>>>>> in an asp.net app domain or on a regular app domain. I have a need to
>>>>> cache some frequently used objects and data. I know in asp.net I have
>>>>> access to a cache object. What can I use to cache when not running in
>>>>> asp.net? I am a vb programmer
>>>>>
>>>>> TIA
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>
>