Lloyd
Wed Aug 10 10:29:07 CDT 2005
oops... for some reason you didn't get my answer!
so I copy it again!
I'm sorry to disagree with previous poster but 2.0 could execute 1.1 apps.
MS seems to agree with me on that as well:
http://msdn.microsoft.com/library/default.asp?url=/library/en-us/dnnetdep/html/netfxcompat.asp
Anyway, the issue with #develop is that the installer (and the application
itself) specifically look for the version 1.1 of the runtime
--
If you're in a war, instead of throwing a hand grenade at the enemy, throw
one of those small pumpkins. Maybe it'll make everyone think how stupid war
is, and while they are thinking, you can throw a real grenade at them.
Jack Handey.
"O.L." <nowhere@invalid.net> wrote in message
news:mn.54007d58cf27e946.18740@invalid.net...
> Chris a formulé la demande :
>> O.L. wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I've installed the .NET framework v2.0 beta 2 on my computer, but when I
>>> try to install SharpDevelop or other softwares, I still get a message
>>> "You must have .NET framework v1.1" ...
>>> Does someone know why ? Can't the 2.0 runtime execute 1.1 apps ?
>>>
>>> Thank you :)
>>> Olivier
>>>
>>
>> No, you need 1.1 to run 1.1 apps.
>>
>> Chris
>
> Thank you :-|
>
> But why isn't there any ascendant compatibility ?
> All the apps compiled with 1.1 ... won't work when users download 2.0
> runtime ? :-o
>
> O.L.
>
> --
> Ceci est une signature automatique de MesNews.
> Site :
http://mesnews.no-ip.com
>