Jon
Fri Jan 18 14:25:27 CST 2008
Mike Gleason jr Couturier <mcouturierMAPSON@bmgmultimedia.com> wrote:
> We're developing websites with VS 2005 (.NET 2.0) and we want to move on to
> .NET 3.X (Not the whole team but the R&D team).
>
> Do we absolutely need to upgrade to Visual Studio 2008 to do that? Is that
> the same thing going from 1.X to 2.0?
No, it's a much smaller step than 1.X to 2.0. The conversion from 1.1
to 2.0 involved a completely new project file format, rather than just
a version number change. Also, you couldn't target 1.1 (easily) from
VS2005, so changing IDE automatically changed the target framework.
> Will we be able to open .NET 2.0 projects from VS 2008 without conversions
> and still be able to open the same projets with VS 2005?
You won't be able to open VS2005 projects in VS2008 or vice versa, but
you can target .NET 2.0 from VS2008, and you can maintain parallel
project files if you absolutely have to.
--
Jon Skeet - <skeet@pobox.com>
http://www.pobox.com/~skeet Blog:
http://www.msmvps.com/jon.skeet
World class .NET training in the UK:
http://iterativetraining.co.uk