I put a small amount of code to support limited capabilities in my
application to support mobile devices. I've used normal aspx (not mobile) and
it appears to work very well. I checked it out with the OpenWare 7, Microsoft
Mobile Explorer 3.0, and Pocket PC 2002 emulators and everything works very
well. I save and get the ViewState from Persistenance media and each of the
two pages that I'm producing only transmits about 500 bytes of data so I
think the performance is OK. Is there any reason that I should change the
code to use the Mobile workspace?

RE: Mobile verses normal aspx? by NoSpamMgbworld

NoSpamMgbworld
Wed Jan 26 08:37:10 CST 2005

The mobile controls may add some richness that you are not experiencing now,
but I see no other reason. Once MS has truly rich controls that render in
different environs, I would not switch unless you have a problem.

---

Gregory A. Beamer
MVP; MCP: +I, SE, SD, DBA

***************************
Think Outside the Box!
***************************

"mterzich" wrote:

> I put a small amount of code to support limited capabilities in my
> application to support mobile devices. I've used normal aspx (not mobile) and
> it appears to work very well. I checked it out with the OpenWare 7, Microsoft
> Mobile Explorer 3.0, and Pocket PC 2002 emulators and everything works very
> well. I save and get the ViewState from Persistenance media and each of the
> two pages that I'm producing only transmits about 500 bytes of data so I
> think the performance is OK. Is there any reason that I should change the
> code to use the Mobile workspace?