nospam
Mon Sep 15 00:23:05 CDT 2003
PLEASE READ THE ORIGINAL POST MORE CLOSELY.
Put yourself in the Mom and Pop shoes and CHECKBOOK and see how the
developer is going to get their business?
...how can they do a small site THAT'S for PRODUCTION when SQL Server is
going to eat up 50% of the total costs of like a $2000 to $4000 dollar site
just to get it running with a simple fill in form...if they want to go and
upgrade...they are looking at UNKNOWN numbers for the client license in
regards to performance.
JUST how and what is the .NET developer going to Mom and Pop when PHP/MySQL
developer is always going to beat them on price when the Mom and pop DON'T
have to RISK and ARM AND A LEG for something that might not pan out.
It clearly one of the FINANCIAL bottlenecks when you buy Windows Server
2003 - Web Edition and THEN compare PRICES......
By making a small SQL Server licensing change, it will make a lot of
people's lives easier...It will also make the mom and pop happier knowing
that the INVESTMENT they original made can BE EASILY used by a just simple
upgrade to like a Standard Editon of SQL 2K....INSTEAD OF a BUGGY as well as
COSTLY PORT
As an MVP, please pay attention next time.
"Tony Rogerson" <tonyrogerson@sqlserver.eu.com> wrote in message
news:OKNAgJ1eDHA.3076@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> >>> Moreover, those who need it to be easy to use (those who don't have a
> >>> Fortune 500 IT staff)...need it to be easy to AFFORD.
>
> Check out MSDE which is basically SQL Server but with some throttling to
> prevent too many concurrent users and a couple of GB's of database in
size.
> You can run MSDE for free unless you connect it to another SQL Server but
in
> your instance I don't think you'd need to do that.
>
> SQL Server processor licence is around $4,000 which is very reasonable
> considering what you get - engine, client tools, analysis services,
> notification services, replication and possibly soon reporting services.
I'm
> not sure PHP and MySQL supply these as part of the product.
>
> If you are looking for an enterprise solution, SQL Server runs on a PDA,
> laptop, desktop, server and 64bit servers now and you still use the same
> syntax, tools etc... regardless, not sure if MySQL has that offering.
>
> There is tons of information and numerous websites giving SQL Server and
> .NET FREE support, unfortunetly there seems to be very few doing MySQL and
> PHP.
>
> There are considerably more training DBA / Developers that can develop
using
> .NET and SQL Server that MySQL and PHP giving a likelyhood of finding good
> quality developers at a reduced price.
>
> SQL Server, Oracle, DB2 all appear in the TPC benchmarks that highlight
the
> stability of a product not to mention its scalability, MySQL has never
> figured which is disappointing but possibly reflects its position in the
> marketplace.
>
> Many more startups are using SQL Server and .NET / ASP in the first place
> rather than other products because there is so much FREE support out there
> and its easy to get development resource. The technology also offers a
real
> rapid way of producing a web application and modifying it as the business
> moves - thats been the biggest problem with technologies such as PHP and
> MySQL is that they are just not flexible enough to move with the business
at
> the speed the business requires in order to stay competitive.
>
> PHP and MySQL has a place, and that place exists (i believe) with the
linix
> world, having said that it competes with the likes of Oracle and DB2,
> however, both of those products are very expensive compared to SQL Server
> and don't offer anywhere near as much functionality for instance, you have
> to buy OLAP/analysis services seperately at great expense.
>
> Looking again at costs, is PHP and MySQL really FREE? How many more man
> hours does it take to code and test and support the environment, how many
> more developers and/or DBA's are required?
>
> --
> Tony Rogerson
> SQL Server MVP
>
http://www.sqlserverfaq.com?mbr=21
> (Create your own groups, Forum, FAQ's and a ton more)
>
>