Metallikanz!
Mon Aug 15 00:36:13 CDT 2005
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
------=_NextPart_000_007D_01C5A189.59BDA740
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
.NET Remoting will be an alternative to WebServices, it's even =
considered a preferred choice for intranet applications over =
webservices, and the best part is that it can be hosted outside of IIS =
which apart from the current scenario that you have, is much more =
robust, stable and fast. Please look up the documentation on this =
subject for more information about security and things.
HTH, Metallikanz!
"rob" <rmdiv2000@yahoo.com> wrote in message =
news:1124083656.851576.63510@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com...
> Yes, basically I will have two applications. The first one is a
> server-client app. The second one is a standalone version, i.e. does
> not need a server. Since both offer the same functionality I want to
> re-use as much code as possible. For the db I will use MSSQL for the
> server-client app and most likely MSDE for the standalone as they are
> quite similar.
>=20
> As mentioned for the server-client I was considering using web
> services. But since the user's computer might not have IIS (Win XP
> Home) I can't just re-use the code. What's the best way to handle =
this?
> Maybe using something else then web services?
>=20
> What other problem areas do I have to consider for instance regarding
> authentification, autherization, security, etc?
>=20
> Regards,
> rob
>
------=_NextPart_000_007D_01C5A189.59BDA740
Content-Type: text/html;
charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
<!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN">
<HTML><HEAD>
<META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; =
charset=3Diso-8859-1">
<META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.2900.2722" name=3DGENERATOR>
<STYLE></STYLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<DIV><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2>.NET Remoting will be an alternative =
to=20
WebServices, it's even considered a preferred choice for intranet =
applications=20
over webservices, and the best part is that it can be hosted outside of =
IIS=20
which apart from the current scenario that you have, is much more =
robust, stable=20
and fast. Please look up the documentation on this subject for more =
information about security and things.</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2>HTH, Metallikanz!</FONT></DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2></FONT> </DIV>
<DIV><FONT face=3DVerdana size=3D2>"rob" <</FONT><A=20
href=3D"mailto:rmdiv2000@yahoo.com"><FONT face=3DVerdana=20
size=3D2>rmdiv2000@yahoo.com</FONT></A><FONT face=3DVerdana =
size=3D2>> wrote in=20
message </FONT><A=20
href=3D"news:1124083656.851576.63510@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com"><FONT =
face=3DVerdana=20
size=3D2>news:1124083656.851576.63510@g14g2000cwa.googlegroups.com</FONT>=
</A><FONT=20
face=3DVerdana size=3D2>...</FONT></DIV><FONT face=3DVerdana =
size=3D2>> Yes,=20
basically I will have two applications. The first one is a<BR>> =
server-client=20
app. The second one is a standalone version, i.e. does<BR>> not need =
a=20
server. Since both offer the same functionality I want to<BR>> re-use =
as much=20
code as possible. For the db I will use MSSQL for the<BR>> =
server-client app=20
and most likely MSDE for the standalone as they are<BR>> quite=20
similar.<BR>> <BR>> As mentioned for the server-client I was =
considering=20
using web<BR>> services. But since the user's computer might not have =
IIS=20
(Win XP<BR>> Home) I can't just re-use the code. What's the best way =
to=20
handle this?<BR>> Maybe using something else then web =
services?<BR>>=20
<BR>> What other problem areas do I have to consider for instance=20
regarding<BR>> authentification, autherization, security, =
etc?<BR>>=20
<BR>> Regards,<BR>> rob<BR>></FONT></BODY></HTML>
------=_NextPart_000_007D_01C5A189.59BDA740--