Murray
Wed Jun 21 14:21:14 CDT 2006
>> 3. If you don't have a low-res alternative should you leave it off or can
>> you link to the same image?
>
> The alt tag is for text. You enter a short text description of the image,
> which is what appears when a mouse moves over the image.
Incorrect.
But first, the low-res alternative is no longer supported, as far as I know.
I never got the idea of making a slow loading image even slower to load by
encumbering the page with the low-res alternative in the first place!
Second, alt ATTRIBUTE is for accessability purposes. Only IE shows the text
when you mouse over it. All modern browsers follow the W3 guidelines for
it - and wait for the title attribute. If you have a title attribute *AND*
an alt attribute, then IE will correctly only display the title attribute's
contents on rollover....
--
Murray
--------------
MVP FrontPage
"Steve Easton" <admin@95isalive.com> wrote in message
news:e4CE%23mVlGHA.2128@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
> In line:
>
> "MP" <A@Z.COM> wrote in message
> news:%23cZVpXVlGHA.1240@TK2MSFTNGP04.phx.gbl...
>>I need some recommendations on using "Alt" tags
>>
>> 1. They are not "required" correct"
>
> Incorrect, they are required to meet W3C standards also for accesability
> reasons
>
>> 2. Best practice is to use them though?
>
> Correct
>
>> 3. If you don't have a low-res alternative should you leave it off or can
>> you link to the same image?
>
> The alt tag is for text. You enter a short text description of the image,
> which is what appears when a mouse moves over the image.
>
> --
> Steve Easton
> Microsoft FrontPage MVP
> FP Cleaner
>
http://www.95isalive.com/fixes/fpclean.htm
> Hit Me FP
>
http://www.95isalive.com/fixes/HitMeFP.htm
>
>