gdoran
Wed Oct 06 09:27:04 CDT 2004
Thanks for all your helpfull advice. At least I know now it is possible and
what to be looking for in the active directory documentation. I will be
checking out the documentation maybe practice installing Windows 2003 a few
times in test enviornment. That way I can see what kind of questions and
choices that will need to be made.
Thanks again,
"Al Mulnick" wrote:
> This would be a great time to read those papers I pointed you to.
> That said, let the 2003 server run as the PDC (in Active Directory, it's
> called the PDCe (emulator)) and it looks and acts just like a NT4 PDC as far
> as your NT 4 servers are concerned.
> As for your tools to manage it, those should change. Your planning should
> be done prior to going this route though. You have to make decisions that
> you may not be able to easily fix later.
>
> Feel free to ping me offline if you have any additional questions
> amulnick_at_nc.rr.com is the address.
>
> -al
>
>
>
> "gdoran" <gdoran@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> news:216E23F9-73F7-4C43-9B57-624D27218BE8@microsoft.com...
> > Will we want to keep the Exchange 5.5 as a BDC when we get rid of the old
> > PDC
> > or will we need to promote the BDC to a PDC and run the 2003 server in
> > interm
> > mode? Not at all familiar with Active Directory or interim mode so any
> > detail would be appreciated!
> >
> > "Al Mulnick" wrote:
> >
> >> You can still run 5.5 that way. You want to look at the Windows 2003
> >> upgrade papers and the Active Directory upgrade papers found at
> >>
http://www.microsoft.com/ad
> >>
> >> Al
> >> "gdoran" <gdoran@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote in message
> >> news:F32B0758-1441-425D-8CBC-A6A182315DAC@microsoft.com...
> >> > We have a NT 4.0 domain with a PDC serving as a fileserver and a BDC
> >> > running
> >> > Exchange 5.5. We will be putting a Windows 2003 server, replacing the
> >> > fileserver. Can we still use the Exchange 5.5 BDC if we run Interim
> >> > Mode
> >> > on
> >> > the Windows 2003 server? Any whitepapers that would talk about this?
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
>