Hi,

Besides the price where frx2any is more expensive.
And both help files are "looking good".
Is there a good reason which one to choose ?
Anybody has some experience with one of them.

Thanks in advance
regards
christophe

Re: xfrx versus frx2any by WP

WP
Thu Nov 02 04:32:19 CST 2006

Hi Cristophe,

I have been using xfrx for almost two years. I just use the easiest part of
it, to generate pdf from within a VFP program. It was quite easy to
install/implement, I had also some questions that the support team answered
quite quickly. The only annoying part is that you have to increase a little
bit in the reports (.frx) the width of the numeric columns, because they
print well with REPORT TO PRINT, but with xfrx they appear with ********.
Also, the generated pdf looks smaller than the printed version of the
report.

Nevertheless, I am quite happy with it.

Walter





"christophe" <irs.znospamforme@skynet.be> escribió en el mensaje
news:uEA7kEm$GHA.4808@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
>
> Besides the price where frx2any is more expensive.
> And both help files are "looking good".
> Is there a good reason which one to choose ?
> Anybody has some experience with one of them.
>
> Thanks in advance
> regards
> christophe
>
>
>
>



Re: xfrx versus frx2any by Jeff

Jeff
Thu Nov 02 08:08:24 CST 2006

I also use XFRX to generate PDF files which I email to my clients. It works
quite well and I always get prompt email responses to technical support
questions. I am quite happy with it.

"christophe" <irs.znospamforme@skynet.be> wrote in message
news:uEA7kEm$GHA.4808@TK2MSFTNGP03.phx.gbl...
> Hi,
>
> Besides the price where frx2any is more expensive.
> And both help files are "looking good".
> Is there a good reason which one to choose ?
> Anybody has some experience with one of them.
>
> Thanks in advance
> regards
> christophe
>
>
>
>