text search in a class lib

Is there a good tool to do text search on classlib, listing the
object.method containing the text? I tried class browser, but the find
function doesn't quite work.

Fred
Thu Jun 23 20:34:00 CDT 2005

Starting with VFP8, there's a Code References tool.

--
Fred
Microsoft Visual FoxPro MVP


"man-wai chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:%23IbrHxFeFHA.3620@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
> Is there a good tool to do text search on classlib, listing the
> object.method containing the text? I tried class browser, but the find
> function doesn't quite work.

man-wai
Thu Jun 23 22:52:18 CDT 2005

Fred Taylor wrote:
> Starting with VFP8, there's a Code References tool.
>
I write programs using a terminal servers session in Windows 2003
server. The VFP 9 Code Reference tool triggered a IE error
(about:security_vfp9.exe).

does it mean that i need to tune down the security level of IE in Win2003?

Fred
Fri Jun 24 09:53:19 CDT 2005

Must be. I search literally hundreds of projects over our network without
any problems. But then again, I am the administrator. We keep all our
projects and source on a server for backup purposes.

--
Fred
Microsoft Visual FoxPro MVP


"man-wai chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:egcXfAHeFHA.1920@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Fred Taylor wrote:
>> Starting with VFP8, there's a Code References tool.
>>
> I write programs using a terminal servers session in Windows 2003 server.
> The VFP 9 Code Reference tool triggered a IE error
> (about:security_vfp9.exe).
>
> does it mean that i need to tune down the security level of IE in Win2003?

Rick
Fri Jun 24 13:28:43 CDT 2005

I don't believe a terminal server is a supported environment for developing in
VFP 8.0/9.0 (see
http://msdn.microsoft.com/vfoxpro/productinfo/sysreqs/default.aspx for System
Requirements). It may be one time where you can't complain when you don't meet
the tested / required specs.

Rick

"man-wai chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:egcXfAHeFHA.1920@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> Fred Taylor wrote:
>> Starting with VFP8, there's a Code References tool.
>>
> I write programs using a terminal servers session in Windows 2003 server. The
> VFP 9 Code Reference tool triggered a IE error (about:security_vfp9.exe).
>
> does it mean that i need to tune down the security level of IE in Win2003?

man-wai
Sun Jun 26 20:37:25 CDT 2005

Fred Taylor wrote:
> Must be. I search literally hundreds of projects over our network without
> any problems. But then again, I am the administrator. We keep all our
> projects and source on a server for backup purposes.
>
How did you do text search on objects and classes back in the days of
VFP 6? There was no "Code Reference" back then.

Fred
Sun Jun 26 23:54:02 CDT 2005

I'd use the FInd form that was available. There were also a few third party
ones, but I think the Find.SCX was the one that I used (it was very similar
to the Find in FPD).

Here's one that I've heard is pretty good, but I've not used it.
ftp://leafe.com/ts.zip and ftp://leafe.com/ts2.zip.

On systems that I use today that are still VFP6, I use the Copernic desktop
search (http://www.copernic.com/). I really only use the Code References
tool when I know specifically which project or folder something is in.

--
Fred
Microsoft Visual FoxPro MVP


"man-wai chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:OLRKDjreFHA.1456@TK2MSFTNGP15.phx.gbl...
> Fred Taylor wrote:
>> Must be. I search literally hundreds of projects over our network
>> without
>> any problems. But then again, I am the administrator. We keep all our
>> projects and source on a server for backup purposes.
>>
> How did you do text search on objects and classes back in the days of
> VFP 6? There was no "Code Reference" back then.

man-wai
Mon Jun 27 07:55:56 CDT 2005

> ones, but I think the Find.SCX was the one that I used (it was very similar
> to the Find in FPD).

Find.scx? Where is it? I used win2k's search function to look for
"find.*" in vfp98 folder, nothing.

> On systems that I use today that are still VFP6, I use the Copernic desktop
> search (http://www.copernic.com/).

The free version is good enough?



--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. http://www.linux-sxs.org
/ v \
/( _ )\ Linux 2.4.30
^ ^ 8:54pm up 45 days 9:03 load average: 0.53 0.85 0.80

Fred
Mon Jun 27 10:07:47 CDT 2005

"man-wai chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:emmEQexeFHA.1680@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> ones, but I think the Find.SCX was the one that I used (it was very
>> similar to the Find in FPD).
>
> Find.scx? Where is it? I used win2k's search function to look for "find.*"
> in vfp98 folder, nothing.

I'm sorry. it was FILER.SCX. There's also a FILER.DLL that was part of it.
That's what I get for relying on my memory.


>
>> On systems that I use today that are still VFP6, I use the Copernic
>> desktop search (http://www.copernic.com/).
>
> The free version is good enough?
>

That's the one I use. It seems to work well enough for me.
--
Fred
Microsoft Visual FoxPro MVP

Anders
Tue Jun 28 07:11:50 CDT 2005

Hi
You have the name wrong. It's Tools\Filer\FILER.SCX

-Anders


Den 05-06-27 14.55, i artikeln emmEQexeFHA.1680@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl, skrev
"man-wai chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com>:

>> ones, but I think the Find.SCX was the one that I used (it was very similar
>> to the Find in FPD).
>
> Find.scx? Where is it? I used win2k's search function to look for
> "find.*" in vfp98 folder, nothing.
>
>> On systems that I use today that are still VFP6, I use the Copernic desktop
>> search (http://www.copernic.com/).
>
> The free version is good enough?
>
>

man-wai
Tue Jun 28 08:32:05 CDT 2005

> I'm sorry. it was FILER.SCX. There's also a FILER.DLL that was part of it.
> That's what I get for relying on my memory.

My all time favorite is the old "ts.exe" from norton utilities. :)

--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. http://www.linux-sxs.org
/ v \
/( _ )\ Linux 2.4.30
^ ^ 9:31pm up 46 days 9:40 load average: 2.16 0.72 0.37

Fred
Tue Jun 28 12:04:23 CDT 2005

My all time favorite was a DOS based grep utility.

--
Fred
Microsoft Visual FoxPro MVP


"man-wai chang" <toylet.toylet@gmail.com> wrote in message
news:OhNYHX%23eFHA.3712@TK2MSFTNGP09.phx.gbl...
>> I'm sorry. it was FILER.SCX. There's also a FILER.DLL that was part of
>> it. That's what I get for relying on my memory.
>
> My all time favorite is the old "ts.exe" from norton utilities. :)
>
> --
> .~. Might, Courage, Vision. http://www.linux-sxs.org
> / v \
> /( _ )\ Linux 2.4.30
> ^ ^ 9:31pm up 46 days 9:40 load average: 2.16 0.72 0.37

Paul
Tue Jun 28 15:16:20 CDT 2005


"Fred Taylor" <ftaylor@mvps.org!REMOVE> wrote in message
news:urALPQteFHA.2700@tk2msftngp13.phx.gbl...
> I'd use the FInd form that was available. There were also a few third
> party ones, but I think the Find.SCX was the one that I used (it was very
> similar to the Find in FPD).

I still use that one! (Although I tweaked it a bit.) It's faster than the
Code References tool, but you can't screen out comments or use the other
bells and whistles.

man-wai
Wed Jun 29 08:10:52 CDT 2005

Fred Taylor wrote:
> My all time favorite was a DOS based grep utility.

I think norton's ts.exe was good enough for the old days when source
codes were text only.

--
.~. Might, Courage, Vision. http://www.linux-sxs.org
/ v \
/( _ )\ Linux 2.4.30
^ ^ 9:09pm up 47 days 9:18 load average: 3.22 1.89 1.25