Re: Outlook Mail Automation by Jim
Jim
Thu Feb 17 16:50:13 CST 2005
Is there a work around for the 'problem' of of trying to warn you that mail
is being sent through automation? I'm still using OL2K for that reason. I
send out email invitations for a survey using this method regularly
(oftentimes to 1000 or more people) and can't/won't upgrade my Office
because of the warning.
My server is NT4 (which is now not supported)
Exchange server 5.5 (which gets dropped later this year for support)
Outlook 2000 (which doesn't have the so-called security of later versions
of office)
all because I need this very important feature of emailing clients for my
surveys.
(I promise that I'm not a spammer - these are legitimate emails going out!!)
Thanks,
Jim Clay
Team Resources, Inc.
www.teamresources.com
"Fred Taylor" <ftaylor@mvps.org!REMOVE> wrote in message
news:OHHdKbqEFHA.1936@TK2MSFTNGP14.phx.gbl...
> All I know is it does work quite fine by referencing the .To/.CC/.BCC
> properties. I've always found the Recipients collection a bit hard to
> deal with, while the direct reference to the properties has always worked
> fine for me.
>
> Thanks for pointing it out, but it looks like it's a warning that has no
> merit or is just plain wrong, possibly a documentation error or was true
> in an earler version of Outlook. It works fine in OL2K,OLXP, OL2K3
> (though XP and 2K3 have the "problem" of trying to warn you that mail is
> being sent through automation.
>
> --
> Fred
> Microsoft Visual FoxPro MVP
>
>
> "Jan Bucek" <bucek.jan@post.cz> wrote in message
> news:e4JEr3mEFHA.1292@TK2MSFTNGP10.phx.gbl...
>> Fred Taylor napsal(a):
>>> Where is this document that doesn't recommend it?
>>>
>> Description of BCC property of MailItem:
>> ...
>> Returns the display list of blind carbon copy (BCC) names for a MailItem.
>> This property contains the display names only. The Recipients collection
>> should be used to modify the BCC recipients.
>> ...
>> in "C:\Program Files\Microsoft Office\Office\1029\VBAOUTL9.CHM" of my
>> Office2k.
>>
>> For english is not my native language, maybe I understand it wrong?
>>
>> Sincerely Jan Bucek
>
>