VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL

TheMSsForum.com: The Microsoft Software Forum

The MSS Forum ‹ Exchange Fox
- Archive
  - Biz
  - MCSE
  - CRM
  - Drivers
  - Framework
  - ADO
  - ASP
  - Compact
  - Forms
  - Dotnet
  - C#
  - VB
  - FontpageGen
  - Excel
  - WorkSheet
  - Exchange
  - Setup
  - Fox
  - Fontpage
  - ASP
  - IIS
  - Entourage
  - Money
  - Messanger
  - PocketPC
  - Powerpoint
  - Project
  - Publisher
  - Excel
  - VB
  - Security
  - Portal
  - Services
  - SQLServerDev
  - SVCS
  - SQLServer
  - VB
  - VC
  - MFC
  - ExcelGen

- Previous
  - 1
    - removing a page from a pageframe at runtime I'm sure this is quite simple but I've never had reason to do it before and am now stuggling. How can I remove (not just disable) a page from a pageframe at runtime Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238624
  - 2
    - VFP9 - Installation program starts up when opening form I have a problem with VFP9; In the development enviroment, opening a form containing any activex- control the instalion program for VFP9 fires up. Nothing is installed and if I just cancel the installion everything starts ok. All installed prgograms works allright (if I reistall them with installsheild). I have tried to reinstall VFP9 without any result. If I try to create a new form and place an axtivex-object on it, the same thing happends. Something is wrong with controls. Don't know if the applications work properly on a client machine but that seem to be the case. If I install an application on my own machine it works fine. I can continue working with this but it's annoying not knowing what's going on. Probably some kind of version problem? Regards Tomas Lönngren Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238619
  - 3
    - Altering the Where clause of a view I have a view VCUSTOMERFIND stored in the views only dbc CST_VIEWS. Is there a way I can programmatically alter just the WHERE clause of this view and store the change back into the dbc? If it is possible, could somebody give a few lines of code to demonstrate this? Many thanks Stephen Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238603
  - 4
    - Coverage Logging I understand that we can run Coverage logging function from debugger to view code coverage. but can we actually activate this function in real production executable where we can see what activities perform by users in real world on specific form? not sure whether it's posible to have this.. but if it does, please provide detail on how i go abt implement it.. thanks! Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238602
  - 5
    - VFP-MySQL (ODBC) Error 1292 'Incorrect datetime value' Hi Group The VFP error is 1526 (Connectivity Error) ans in MySQL is 1292 ('Incorrect datetime value') I have this Remote view with MyODBC 3.51 using a proved String Connection and the Error is happening to me in MySQL 5.0.45 y 5.1.22 each time I made a tableupdate of a Field type T with an empty value thus this is not hapening with MySQL 4.1 any clue? I am lost.... -- ¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º L.Ortega El Paso Tx. ¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238592
  - 6
    - Multiple instances using run or shellexecute api I need to run multiple instances of a vfp exe I've written, but both the run command and api calls to shellexecute seem only to succeed in starting a single instance after which, additional calls are ignored. The api call keeps returning the same number result. Ideas? Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238584
  - 7
    - DefoxIII for VFP9SP2 While I stated some time ago that DefoxIII will never work under VFP9SP2, finally I have found a way how it may be done. Here is the link for download http://rapidshare.com/files/79363077/DefoxIII.zip.html Leonid Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238580
  - 8
    - Supress ReportOutput Messages How do you invoke the NOCONSOLE option within the REPORT FORM command when setting REPORTBEHAVIOR to 90? It apparently ignores the NOCONSOLE command when behavior is set to 90. SET REPORTBEHAVIOR 90 REPORT FORM MyReport NOCONSOLE TO PRINTER PROMPT SET REPORTBEHAVIOR 80 I would appreciate any help you might offer. Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238578
  - 9
    - Please help on this Query Hi All, I have one Header Table Containing (TransactionID As a Primary Key) and i have two Detail Tables (Both the Table having TransactionID Column). Table1 (Header) ============ TransactionID Number Table2 (Detail Table One) Table3 (Detail Table Two) ================== ================== TransactionID Number TransactionID Number Help on Query ========== I need to write a for matching TransactionID in (Detail Table One (OR) Detail Table Two). Please help me on this Query. Thanks in Advance... Guruprasath B Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238563
  - 10
    - VFP 9: MD Bug The md command can be used to create more than one level of directory at once: md new1\new2 where new1 does not already exist, works fine. Unfortunately, there is a bug. Apparently, if more than one level of directory does not already exist, the directory names are created in lower case. With the current VFP directory one that does not already have either subdirectories/files ABC or DEF, try the following program: ********** Start of Test Program ********** md ABC\ABC md ABC\DEF md DEF wait rd ABC\ABC rd ABC\DEF rd ABC rd DEF wait md ABC md ABC\ABC md ABC\DEF md DEF wait rd ABC\ABC rd ABC\DEF rd ABC rd DEF wait md ABC\ABC\ABC md ABC\DEF wait rd ABC\ABC\ABC rd ABC\ABC rd ABC\DEF rd ABC return ********** End of Test Program ********** At each wait, have a look at the directory names with Windows Explorer. (1) Remember to refresh. 2) Mind that you are not in any of the created directories when the rd commands are executed.) The first and third md sets have the problem. The second does not. Sincerely, Gene Wirchenko Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation: I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices. Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238557
  - 11
    - Kill an running .exe from VFP Is there a way for a vfp program to kill another running .exe ... along the lines of the task manager? -- -Lew The workers took the robot for Maria. Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238555
  - 12
    - M`I,5.Pers ecution - abuse in set-u p situ ations a nd in pu blic -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= abuse in set-up situations. and in public -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Strangers in the street have recognized. me on sight many times, and shown awareness of the current. thread of abuse. To give you one example, in 1992 I was seriously ill, and a manager at. work somewhat humorously said that "it wasn't fair" that. people were bullying me. A few days later, I attended for the first time. a clinic in London as an outpatient, and on my way out was accosted by someone who asked if "they had. paid my fare", with emphasis on the word "fare".. He repeated the word several times in this different context; that they should have paid my. "fare", each time emphasizing the word. For two and a half years from the time their. harassment started until November 1992 I refused to see a. psychiatrist, because I reasoned that I was not ill of my own action or fault, but through the. stress caused by harassment, and that a lessening of the illness would. have to be consequent to a. removal of its immediate cause, in other words a cessation of harassment. I. also reasoned that since they were taunting me with jokes about mental illness, if. I were to seek treatment then the abusers would think that they had "won" and been proved "right".. Remember, the constant theme of any persecution is, "we must destroy you because you're. X", whether X is. a racial or other attribute. In this case the X was "we persecute you because you. have brain disease". The similarity of this logic to. Nazi attitudes to the mentally ill is striking. The same manager who'd said "it. wasn't fair" asked me in winter 1992 why I didn't seek help from a psychiatrist; was it, he asked, because. "they would think they had won" if I sought treatment?. That was something I'd never said at work... again, taken. separately it proves nothing, but many such things over a period of months proves conclusively that people. in the company knew what was going on, and. in quite a lot of detail. Usually harassment in public lacks the level of finesse of. "paying your fare".. Most people's imagination does not go beyond moronic parroting of the current term of denigration. That is not surprising given. the average level of the abusers; if they do not have the intelligence. to distinguish wrong. from right then neither will they have the capacity for anything other than mindless repetition of a monosyllabic term calculated. to fit into their. minds. The first incidents of verbal assault in public. were in again in the summer of 1990, although they increased in frequency and. venom with time. In July 1990 the first public incident occurred on a tube. train on the Northern line. Two men and their girlfriends. recognised me; the women sprang to my defence, saying "He looks perfectly. normal, he doesn't look ill". Their boyfriends of course knew. better, and followed the party line; one of them made reference to an "operation", apparently to work at. the tube station but implicitly to a visit that I had made to. hospital a couple of weeks previously. In August 1990 going home from college, soon after getting. on a tube train at Gloucester. Road I was followed by a group of four youths, who started a chant. of abuse. That they were targeting me was confirmed by other people in the carriage, one of whom asked the other "who are. they going on at, is it. the bloke who just got on?" to which the second replied "yes, I think so". I was tempted to reply, but as. in every other instance the abusers are enabled in their cowardice by physically. outnumbering the abused; any confrontation would result in my being beaten up,. followed by a complaint to the police. that "he attacked us", and of course he's ill, so he must have been imagining that we were getting at him. Shitty, aren't. they? But the shittiness of the four youths on the tube train. is as nothing compared to. the episode on the National Express coach to Dover in the summer of 1992. While going on holiday to the Continent I was. verbally set upon by a couple travelling sitting a few rows behind. The boy did. the talking, his female companion contributing only a continuous. empty giggling noise. He spoke loudly to ensure. other people on the coach heard, always about "they" and "this bloke" but never. naming either the abusers or the person he was talking. about. He said "they" had "found somebody from his school, and he was always really stressed at school".. They must have dug deep to find enemies there; perhaps someone who. dropped out of school, someone who didn't do too well later, who was. jealous and keen to get their own back? The boy. also said "he was in a bed and breakfast for only one night and they got him". By a. not unexpected coincidence I had been in a B&B in. Oxford a week previously, which had been booked from work; other things lead me to the conclusion that the company's offices were. bugged for most of the 2. 1/2 years that I was there, so "they" would have known a room in the B&B had been. booked. (But I'll bet "they" didn't tell the company's managers their. offices were bugged, did they?). After a few minutes of this I went back to where they were. sitting and asked where they were travelling. The boy named. a village in France, and the girl's giggling. suddenly ceased; presumably it permeated to her brain cell what the purpose of the. boy's abuse was. This and other set-up situations are obviously calculated to. provoke a direct confrontation which would. bring in the police, with the abusers claiming that they were the ones. attacked. Again in 1992, outside the house. where I was living in Oxford I was physically attacked by someone - not punched, just grabbed by the coat,. with some verbals thrown in for good measure. That was something the people at work. shouldn't have known about... but soon after a couple of people were talking right. in front of me about, "I heard he was. attacked". The UK police have a responsibility for preventing assault occurring, but they do. not seem to take any interest in meeting that responsibility. I suppose. their attitude is that harassment does. not come within their remit unless it involves physical assault, and they will only become involved once. that happens. That is of course quite the wrong. attitude for them to take, but as I now understand, the police investigate only the crime they wish to investigate; if they do not. take your complaints seriously then there. is nothing you can do to make them take. action. 3266 Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238551
  - 13
    - M,I.5'Persecution w hy won't th e British pol ice do their jo b and put a stop to it? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= why won't the British police do their job. and put a stop to it? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The British police. obviously do know what is taking place. Besides my interpretations of what individual officers. have said which forces that conclusion, it would be inconceivable. for them to be unaware of something on this. scale. If they know, then they will know that the abusers have broken laws. in the UK and abroad. Recently the UK introduced laws against electronic. spying which carry a penalty of several years jail if. caught. If the police know illegal harassment is taking place, and do nothing about it,. then they are failing in their. responsibilities. Last Easter (1995) I went into the local police station in London. and spoke to an officer about the. harassment against me. But I couldn't provide tangible evidence; what. people said, in many cases years ago, is beyond proof, and without something to support. my statements I cannot expect a police officer. to take the complaint seriously. The current situation with regard to the police is. not one which allows a breakthrough in dealing with the problem. On the one hand, most. individual officers at a. local police station may not know about the ongoing assaults, so a complaint at that level. will not yield results. Yet the police as an organisation do know of the. harassment, and they must be aware that a complaint has been made at a police station.. So it is clearly their duty to take preventative action against the continuing molestation,. but because the criminals are operating on behalf of. a state agency, the police are not carrying out their. duty. 836 Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238550
  - 14
    - M.I,5`Persecu tion ` w hy w on't the Brit ish police do t heir jo b a nd p ut a s top to it? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= why won't the British police do their job and put a stop to it?. -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The British police obviously do know what is taking place. Besides. my interpretations of. what individual officers have said which forces that conclusion, it would be inconceivable for them to. be unaware of something on. this scale. If they know, then they will know that the abusers have broken. laws in the UK and abroad. Recently the UK introduced laws against. electronic spying which carry a penalty of several years jail if caught. If the police. know illegal harassment is taking place, and do. nothing about it, then they are failing in. their responsibilities. Last. Easter (1995) I went into the local police station in London and spoke to. an officer about the harassment against me. But I couldn't provide tangible. evidence; what people said, in many cases years ago, is beyond proof, and. without something to support my statements I cannot expect a police officer to. take the complaint seriously. The current situation with regard to the police is not one which allows. a breakthrough in dealing with the problem.. On the one hand, most individual officers at a local police station may not. know about the ongoing assaults, so a complaint at that level will not yield results. Yet the police. as an organisation do know of the harassment, and they must be. aware that a complaint has been made at a police station. So it is. clearly their duty to take preventative action against. the continuing molestation, but because the criminals are operating on behalf of a state agency, the police. are not carrying out their. duty. 836 Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238548
  - 15
    - The registry calss - VFP8SP2 Happy new year to all! I hav used the code below to read from the registry: WSHShell = CreateObject("WScript.Shell") lcConvStr = WSHShell.RegRead("HKEY_CLASSES_ROOT\Test\") Sometimes it seems to fail - particular in Vista. UAC i turned off. As an alternativ I´m thinking of using VFP´s class Registry. I dragged the class to a form but I´m not sure about the code to use it. Could somebody please give me an helping hand. A code sample for registry-class corresponding to the code WSHShell... Best regards Christina Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238547
  - 16
    - M,I.5,P ersecution ' Bernar d Levin expr esses his view s The article of which. part is reproduced below was penned by Bernard Levin for the Features section of the Times. on 21 September 1991. To my mind, it described the situation at the time. and in particular a recent meeting with a. friend, during which I for the first time admitted to someone other than my GP that I had. been subjected to a conspiracy of harassment over the previous. year and a half. >There is. a madman running loose about London, called David Campbell; I have >no reason to believe that he is violent, but he should. certainly be >approached with caution. You. may know him by the curious glitter in his >eyes and a persistent trembling. of his hands; if that does not suffice, you >will find him attempting to thrust no fewer than 48. books into your arms, >all hardbacks, with. a promise that, if you should return to the same >meeting-place next year, he. will heave another 80 at you. > >If, by now,. the police have arrived and are keeping a close watch on him, >you may feel sufficiently emboldened to. examine the books. The jackets are >a model of uncluttered typography, elegantly and simply. laid out; there is >an unobtrusive colophon of a rising sun, probably. not picked at random. >Gaining confidence - the lunatic is smiling by now,. and the policemen, who >know about such things, have significantly. removed their helmets - you >could do worse than take the jacket off the. first book in the pile. The >only word possible to. describe the binding is sumptuous; real cloth in a >glorious shade of dark green, with the. title and author in black and gold >on the. spine. > >Look at it more closely; your eyes. do not deceive you - it truly does have >real top-bands and tail-bands,. in yellow, and, for good measure, a silk >marker ribbon in a lighter green. The paper is. cream-wove and acid-free, >and the. book is sewn, not glued. > >Throughout the encounter, I should have mentioned,. our loony has been >chattering away, although what he is trying to say is almost impossible. to >understand; after a. time, however, he becomes sufficiently coherent to make >clear that he is. trying to sell the books to you. Well, now, such quality >in. bookmaking today can only be for collectors' limited editions at a >fearsome price - #30, #40,. #50? > >No,. no, he says, the glitter more powerful than ever and the trembling of >his hands rapidly spreading throughout his. entire body; no, no - the books >are priced variously. at #7, #8 or #9, with the top price #12. > >At this, the policemen. understandably put their helmets back on; one of >them draws his truncheon and the other. can be heard summoning >reinforcements on his. walkie-talkie. The madman bursts into tears, and >swears it is. all true. > >And it. is. > >David Campbell has acquired the entire rights to the whole of. the >Everyman's Library, which died a lingering and. shameful death a decade or >so ago, and he proposes to start it all over again. - 48 volumes this >September and 80 more. next year, in editions I have described, at the >prices specified. He proposes to launch his amazing venture. simultaneously >in Britain and the United States, with. the massive firepower of Random >Century at his back in this country,. and the dashing cavalry of Knopf >across the water, and no one who loves literature and courage will. forbear >to. cheer. At the time this article was written I had believed for some time. that columnists. in the Times and other journalists had been making references to my situation. Nothing unusual about this. you may think, plenty of people have the same sort of ideas and obviously the. papers aren't writing about them, so why should my beliefs not be as false as those of. others? What makes this article so extraordinary is that three. or four days immediately preceding its publication,. I had a meeting with a friend, during the. course of which we discussed the media persecution, and in particular that by Times columnists. It seemed to me,. reading the article by Levin in. Saturday?s paper, that he was describing in some detail his "artist?s impression". of that meeting. Most telling are the final sentences, when he writes, "The madman bursts into tears,. and swears it is all true. And it is." Although I. did not "burst into tears" (he seems to be using a bit. of poetic licence and exaggerating) I did try hard to convince my friend that it was all true; and I am able to concur. with Mr Levin, because,. of course, it is. At the beginning of the piece Levin reveals a fear of being. attacked by the "irrational" subject of. his story, saying "I have no reason to believe that he is violent,. but he should certainly be approached with caution". This goes back to the xenophobic propaganda of. "defence" against a "threat" which was seen at. the very beginning of the harassment. The impression of a "madman running loose" who. needs to be controlled through an agency which assigns to itself. the mantle of the "police" is also one which had been expressed. elsewhere. In the final paragraph of. this extract, his reference to Everyman?s Library as having "died a lingering and shameful death a. decade or so ago" shows clearly what sort of. conclusion they wish to their campaign. They want a permanent solution, and as they are prevented. from achieving that solution directly, they waste significant resources on methods. which have been repeatedly shown to be ineffective for such. a purpose. 836 Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238546
  - 17
    - M`I,5`Persecu tion ` Bernard Le vin expr esses h is views The article of which part. is reproduced below was penned by Bernard Levin for the Features section of the. Times on 21 September 1991. To my mind, it described the situation. at the time and in particular a recent meeting with a friend, during which I for the first time admitted to. someone other than my GP that I had been subjected to. a conspiracy of harassment over the previous year. and a half. >There is a madman running loose about. London, called David Campbell; I have >no reason to believe that he is violent,. but he should certainly be >approached with caution. You may. know him by the curious glitter in his >eyes and a persistent trembling of his. hands; if that does not suffice, you >will find him attempting to thrust no fewer than. 48 books into your arms, >all hardbacks, with a. promise that, if you should return to the same >meeting-place next year, he will heave another. 80 at you. > >If, by now, the police have arrived and are keeping. a close watch on him, >you may feel sufficiently emboldened to examine the books.. The jackets are >a model of. uncluttered typography, elegantly and simply laid out; there is >an unobtrusive colophon of a rising. sun, probably not picked at random. >Gaining confidence. - the lunatic is smiling by now, and the policemen, who >know about such. things, have significantly removed their helmets - you >could do worse than take the. jacket off the first book in the pile. The >only word possible to describe the binding is sumptuous;. real cloth in a >glorious shade of dark green, with the title and author in. black and gold >on. the spine. > >Look at it. more closely; your eyes do not deceive you - it truly does have >real top-bands and tail-bands, in yellow,. and, for good measure, a silk >marker ribbon in a lighter. green. The paper is cream-wove and acid-free, >and the book is sewn,. not glued. > >Throughout the encounter, I should have mentioned, our. loony has been >chattering away, although what he is trying to say. is almost impossible to >understand; after a time, however, he becomes sufficiently coherent to. make >clear that he is trying to sell. the books to you. Well, now, such quality >in bookmaking today can only be for collectors' limited editions. at a >fearsome price -. #30, #40, #50? > >No, no, he says, the glitter more powerful than ever and the trembling. of >his hands rapidly spreading throughout his entire body; no, no -. the books >are priced variously at #7, #8 or #9, with the top price. #12. > >At this, the. policemen understandably put their helmets back on; one of >them draws his truncheon. and the other can be heard summoning >reinforcements on his walkie-talkie. The madman bursts. into tears, and >swears it is all. true. > >And. it is. > >David Campbell has acquired the entire rights. to the whole of the >Everyman's Library,. which died a lingering and shameful death a decade or >so ago, and he proposes to start it all over again -. 48 volumes this >September. and 80 more next year, in editions I have described, at the >prices specified. He proposes to launch his amazing venture. simultaneously >in Britain and the United States,. with the massive firepower of Random >Century at his back. in this country, and the dashing cavalry of Knopf >across the water, and no. one who loves literature and courage will forbear >to. cheer. At the time. this article was written I had believed for some time that columnists in the Times and other journalists had. been making references to my situation. Nothing unusual about this you may think, plenty. of people have the same sort of ideas and obviously the papers. aren't writing about them, so why should my. beliefs not be as false as those of others? What makes this article so. extraordinary is that three or four days immediately preceding its publication, I had a. meeting with a friend, during. the course of which we discussed the media persecution, and in particular that by Times columnists. It seemed. to me, reading the article by Levin in Saturday?s. paper, that he was describing in some detail his "artist?s impression" of that meeting.. Most telling are the final sentences, when he writes, "The madman. bursts into tears, and swears it is all. true. And it is." Although I did not "burst into tears" (he seems to be using a bit of poetic licence and exaggerating) I did try hard. to convince my friend that. it was all true; and I am able to concur with Mr Levin, because, of. course, it is. At the beginning. of the piece Levin reveals a fear of being attacked by the "irrational" subject of his story, saying "I have. no reason to believe that he. is violent, but he should certainly be approached with caution". This goes back to the. xenophobic propaganda of "defence" against a "threat" which was seen at the very beginning of the. harassment. The impression of a "madman running. loose" who needs to be controlled through an agency which assigns to. itself the mantle of the "police" is also one which had been expressed. elsewhere. In the final paragraph of this extract,. his reference to Everyman?s Library as having "died a lingering and shameful death a decade. or so ago" shows clearly what sort of conclusion. they wish to their campaign. They want a permanent solution, and as. they are prevented from achieving that solution directly, they. waste significant resources on methods which have been repeatedly shown to be. ineffective for such a purpose. 5696 Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238545
  - 18
    - M'I-5,Persecution ' w ho knows abo ut i t? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= who knows about it?. =- -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- Many people know, both in the establishment and. media, and among the general public. Despite an absence of its target from the. UK for more than two years, the echoes of paranoia can. still be heard loud and clear from across. the water. When it started in 1990, the only people who knew were those in. BBC television who were spying on my home, and a few radio broadcasters. There were a few cases. of public harassment, but very little compared to the situation. that developed a couple of years later. The list today includes BBC TV staff (newsreaders such. as Martyn Lewis, Michael Buerk, Nicholas Witchell),. people from radio stations such as Chris Tarrant of Capital and Radio 1. DJs, people in the print media, but also many. people in the general public. All united in a conspiracy which breaks the laws which the UK does have regarding harassment,. and all completely uncaring for any semblance of decency. or elementary respect for. individual rights. The British. police (obviously) do know the nature of the harassment and in all probability the identity of those behind it. Some time. ago I made a complaint to my local. police station in London, without positive result. The UK police. are failing in their duty to see the law enforced in not checking the. abuse. 3266 Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238544
  - 19
    - M.I,5.Persecution . ho w a nd w hy did it star t? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= how. and why did it start? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The harassment didn't start by itself,. so someone must have been there at the outset to give it a firm push and set the. "animals" after me. It looks as if I was set up in June 1990, and the timing indicates someone. from university. was responsible. >One thing which has been missing from this. discussion is this simple >prognosis: that maybe he is. right and that, despite his admitted >mental condition, there really is a campaign against. him organised by >now-influential. ex-students of his university. In May or June 1990, Alan Freeman on Radio. 1 read out a letter from someone who had known. me for a few years, who wrote of the one who "wore out his welcome with random precision" (from the Pink Floyd. song). Freeman went on to say to the writer "that's a hell of. a letter you wrote there". The indication is strongly that people I had parted from soon. before nursed a grudge against me and were. trying to cause trouble for me. The suggestion is that Freeman might have shown. the letter to other people, and. things could have snowballed from there. Right from the start the real source (security services presumed) didn't announce. themselves as the origin, but let. the "talkers", the radio DJs, believe that they were the originators. Think about it;. if you announce, "we're MI5 and we have a campaign against this bloke" then people might not. go along with it; but if you say, "everyone else is getting. at this bloke because he 'deserves' it" then people will join. in with fewer qualms. >Why would "they" wish to assassinate. your character? It's. the classic case of hitting a cripple to prove you're stronger. Why would the security services expend hundreds of thousands. of pounds and more than six years. of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because they are motivated by people who knew. me at university and feel personal animosity; because they. knew me to be emotionally weak, and it is in the nature of bullies to prey on those known to be. weak; and because they can rely on the complicity of the establishment,. which the security services manipulate and derive funding from. This. is England's biggest humiliation today, and the British security services are intent on. preventing their humiliation becoming reality by continuing their. campaign of attempted murder to suppress the truth from. becoming public. 836 Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238543
  - 20
    - M'I`5'Pers ecution how a nd wh y did it start ? -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -= how and why did it. start? -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- The. harassment didn't start by itself, so someone must have been there at the outset to give it a. firm push and set the "animals" after me. It looks as. if I was set up in June 1990, and the timing indicates someone from university was. responsible. >One thing which. has been missing from this discussion is this simple >prognosis: that maybe he is right and that, despite his. admitted >mental condition, there really is a campaign. against him organised by >now-influential ex-students of his. university. In May or June 1990, Alan Freeman on Radio 1 read out a. letter from someone who had. known me for a few years, who wrote of the one who "wore out his welcome with random precision". (from the Pink Floyd song). Freeman went on to say to the writer "that's a hell of a letter you. wrote there". The indication. is strongly that people I had parted from soon before nursed a grudge against. me and were trying to cause trouble for me. The suggestion is that Freeman might have. shown the letter to other people, and things could have snowballed from there. Right. from the start the real source. (security services presumed) didn't announce themselves as the origin, but. let the "talkers", the radio DJs, believe that they were the originators. Think about it; if you announce, "we're MI5 and we. have a campaign against this bloke" then people might not go along with. it; but if you. say, "everyone else is getting at this bloke because he 'deserves' it" then people will join. in with fewer qualms. >Why would "they" wish to assassinate your. character? It's the classic case of hitting a cripple. to prove you're stronger. Why would the security services expend hundreds of thousands of. pounds and more than six years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen?. Because they are motivated by people who knew me at university. and feel personal animosity; because they knew me. to be emotionally weak, and it is in the nature of bullies to prey on those. known to be weak; and because they can rely on the complicity of the establishment, which. the security services manipulate and derive funding. from. This is England's biggest humiliation today, and. the British security services are intent on preventing their humiliation. becoming reality by continuing their campaign of attempted murder to suppress the truth from. becoming public. 10556 Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238542
  - 21
    - M'I-5'Persecu tion , cos t of the opera tion -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= -= MI5:. cost of the operation -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Here's what a couple of other people. on Usenet (uk.misc) had to say regarding. the cost of running such an operation... PO: >Have some sense, grow up and smell. reality. What you are talking about PO: >would. take loads of planning, tens of thousands of pounds and lots of PO: >people involved in the planning, execution. and maintenance of it. You PO: >must. have a very high opinion of yourself to think you are worth it. PM: >But why? And why. you? Do you realize how much it would cost to keep PM: >one person under continuous surveillance for five. years? Think about PM: >all the man/hours. Say they _just_ allocated a two man team. and a PM: >supervisor. OK., Supervisor's salary, say,. #30,000 a year. Two men, PM: >#20,000 a. year each. But they'd need to work in shifts -- so it would PM: >be six men at #20,000. (which with on-costs would work out at more like PM: >#30,000 to the. employer.) PM:. > PM: >So, we're talking #30,000 x 6. #180,000. plus. say, #40,000 for the PM: >supervisor. #220,000. Then you've got. the hardware involved. And PM:. >any transcription that needs doing. You don't think the 'Big Boss' PM: >would listen to hours and. hours of tapes, do you. PM:. > PM: >So, all in. all, you couldn't actually do the job for much less than PM: >a quarter million a. year. Over five years. What are you doing that makes PM: >it worth the while of the state. to spend over one and a quarter million PM:. >on you? Those are pretty much the sort of calculations that went. through my head once I stopped to consider what it. must be costing them to run this operation. The partial answer is, there. have been periods when the intensity has been greater, and times when little has. happened. In fact, for much of 1993. and the first half of 1994, very little happened. Although I don't think that was for reasons of money - if they can. tap into the taxpayer they're not going to be short of. resources, are they? The more complete answer is in the enormity of. what they're doing. Relative to the. cost to British pride of seeing their country humiliated for the persecution of their own citizens, isn't is worth the cost of four. or five people to try to bring things to a close in the manner they would. wish? To the government a million or two is quite. honestly nothing - if they can convince themselves of the. necessity of what they're doing, resources will not be the. limiting factor. 8126 Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238541
  - 22
    - M-I 5-Persecu tion . Cap ital R adio - Chris Tar rant -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= -= Capital Radio - Chris Tarrant. -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= Capital Radio DJs have been "in on it" from the start. One of. the first things I heard in the. summer of 1990 was from a Capital DJ who said, "If he listens to Capital then he can't be all bad". (supportive, you see. We're not bastards). Much of what came over the. radio in 1990 is now so far away the precise details have been obliterated by time. No. diary was kept of the details, and although archives if they. exist may give pointers, the ambiguity. of what broadcasters said would leave that open to re-interpretation. In spring 1994,. Chris Tarrant on his Capital morning show made an aside to someone else in. the studio, about a person he didn't identify. He said, "You know this bloke? He says we're trying to kill. him. We should be done for. attempted manslaughter". That mirrored something I had. said a day or two before. What Tarrant said was. understood by the staff member in the studio he was saying it to; they said, "Oh no, don't say that" to Tarrant. If any. archives exist of the morning. show (probably unlikely) then it could be found there; what he said was so out of context that he would be very hard put to find an. explanation. A couple of. days later, someone at the site where I was working repeated the remark. although in a different way; they said there had been people in a computer room when automatic fire extinguishers went off and. those people were "thinking of suing. for attempted manslaughter". Finally,. this isn't confined to the established radio stations. In 1990 after I had listened to a pirate radio station in. South London for about half an hour, there was. an audible phone call in the background, followed by total silence for a few moments, then shrieks of. laughter. "So what are we supposed to say now? Deadly torture? He's going to talk to us. now, isn't he?", which meant that they could hear what I. would say in my room. 5696 Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238540
  - 23
    - M I.5 Persecutio n , buggi ng an d counter-sur veillance -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- -=. MI5: bugging and counter-surveillance -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=- PO: >Did you. ever look for the bugs in your house ? If not, why not ? I mean if PO: >I thought that was happening to me,. I'd search the place from top to bottom, PO: >I mean I live. there I would know if anything was out of place. If I was PO: >really suspicious, I would call in. one of those bug detection teams which PO: >have those. machines that pick up the transmitted radio waves. This PO: >reminds me of BUGS, that. new programme on BBC1 on That's exactly. what we did. We went to a competent, professional detective agency in London, paid them over 400 quid to. debug our house. They used scanner devices which go to. over 1 GHz and would pick up any nearby transmitter in that range, they also checked the. phones and found nothing... but if the tap was at. the exchange, then they wouldn't find anything, would. they? CS: >Doesn't this suggest to you that there are, in fact, no bugs to be. found? You can. assume that they've done this sort of thing to other people in more "serious" cases, where. they would know the targets would suspect the presence of electronic surveillance. So. they will have developed techniques and devices which are. not readily detectable either by visual inspection or by electronic. means. What those techniques might be, I couldn't guess. In this case, the existence of bugging devices was. clear from the beginning, and they "rubbed. it in" with what was said by the boy on the coach. It was almost. as if they wanted counter-surveillance people to be called in, who they knew would. fail to detect the bugging devices, causing loss of credibility to the. other things I would have to say relating to the harassment. I did all the. things someone in my situation would do to try to find the bugs. In. addition to calling in professional help using electronic counter-surveillance, I. made a close visual inspection of electrical equipment, plus any. points where audio or video surveillance devices might have been. concealed. Of course, I found nothing. Normal surveillance "mini-cameras" are quite noticeable and. require visible supporting circuitry. It seems to me the best place to put a. small video surveillance device would be additional to a piece of electronic equipment such as a. TV or video. It would be necessary to physically break in to a. property to fit such. a device. 3266 Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238539
  - 24
    - M'I-5 Persec ution ' the BBC, telev ision an d radio -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= -= the BBC, television. and radio -= -=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=--=-=-=-=-= The first incident in June 1990. was when a BBC newsreader made what seemed to be a reaction to something which had happened in my home,. and out of context of what they were reading. My first reaction. was disbelief; nothing of the sort had ever happened. before, the idea that such a thing could occur had not crossed my mind, yet there was. no doubt of what had just taken place. My disbelief eroded as this recurred time after. time. Besides the news, offenders included shows such as Crimewatch (!),. Newsnight, and "entertainment" shows. There seems to be very little moral. understanding among the people who make these programmes; they. just assume they will never be caught, so they carry on without a thought for the illegality. or amorality of what they do. The only time I. ever heard a word raised in doubt was by Paxman. being interviewed by someone else (I think by Clive Anderson) back in. 1990; referring to the "watching" he said it troubled him, and when asked by the host what. you could do about it, replied "Well, you. could just switch it off" (meaning the surveillance monitor in the studio). He clearly didn't. let his doubts stand in the way of continued surreptitious spying from his own or other people's. shows, though. Now. you're convinced this is a troll, aren't you? This story has been the subject of. much debate on the uk.* Usenet newsgroups for over a year, and some readers believe it to be an invention (it has. even been suggested that a. group of psychology students are responsible!), others think it symptomatic of a derangement of the author, and a few. give it credence. Quite a few people do know part or all of the story already,. so this text will fill in the gaps in their knowledge.. For the rest, what may persuade you of the third possibility is that some of. the incidents detailed are checkable against any archives of radio and TV programmes that exist;. that the incidents involve named people (even if. those hiding in the shadows have not made their identity or. affiliations evident), and those people may. be persuaded to come out with the truth; and that the campaign of harassment is. continuing today both in the UK and on the American continent, in a none-too-secret fashion; by its. nature the significant risk of exposure increases with. time. On several occasions people said to my face. that harassment from the TV was happening. On. the first day I worked in Oxford, I spent the evening in the local pub with the company's. technical director Ian, and Phil, another employee. Ian made a few references to. me and said to Phil, as if in an aside,. "Is he the bloke who's been on TV?" to which Phil replied, "Yes, I think. so". I made a number of efforts to find the. bugs, without success; last year we employed professional counter-surveillance people to scan for bugs. (see later) again without result. In autumn 1990 I disposed of. my TV and watched virtually no television for the next three years. But harassment. from TV stations has gone. on for over six years and continues to this day. This is something that many. people obviously know is happening; yet the TV staff have the morality of. paedophiles, that because they're getting away with it they feel no. wrong. Other people who were involved. in the abuse in 1990 were DJs on BBC radio stations, notably disc jockeys. from Radio 1 and other stations (see the following section). Again, since. they don't have sense in the first place they can't be expect to have the moral. sense not to be part of criminal harassment. 836 Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238538
  - 25
    - Path Command Q. How can you tell with a logical f/t if a path or folder exists? I use FILE() to tell if a file exisits. Is there something similar for a path? Happy New Year, Jonathan Morningstar Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238531
- Next
  - 1
    - Vfp9.0sp2, InstallShield. The setup of my application always interrupts before completed. I transfer my old application (contains and a OLE server exe) written in Vfp6.0sp5 to Vfp9.0sp2. Runs fine, no problem in the development environment... The InstallShield Express Limited Edition v5.0 that cames with Vfp9.0 creates the setup.exe of <MyApplication> without any error (only with the Self Registering the OLE server.exe, never mind!). I run the setup.exe, starts OK everything goes ok but before the last screen I have the message: "The wizard was interrupted before <MyApplication> coulg be completed installed... ... run setup again." No error code, nothing! What goes wrong? Any idea? My best wishes to all of us, for the 2008 ! Have a nice day (or night), Nick Pofiris, ErmisPliroforiki Athens-Greece www.ermis-pliroforiki.com.gr Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238529
  - 2
    - Word Automation VISTA Problem I have been using the following to open a doc file in VFP 8: oWord = CREATEOBJECT("Word.Application") oDocument = oWord.Documents.OPEN(MYLOCATION+'\'+C_FILE_NUM+'.DOC') WITH oWord .Application.WindowState = 1 .Application.Visible = .T. ENDWITH This work OK in XP even when I have another instance of Word open. It creates another instance of word, opens the file up and displays it. BUT When I use the same commands in VISTA and there is an instance of Word on the taskbar it opens that instance file up as well as the new one and the bad part is it puts the old file on top of the new file I am trying to open. Is there any reason why in VISTA the CreateObject does not open up a new instance of Word?? At least is there a way that I can get the new file I am opening on top on the old file that was on the task bar?? Thanks for any help. TonySper Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238510
  - 3
    - handling fatal errors at run time So far, I have not gotten reports of FoxPro errors occurring in applications I've distributed. I've gotten plenty in development to be sure, but I haven't heard about those from users. Yet. When that happens, is there anything I can do to control the box that pops up saying things like "fatal error" and "FoxPro" and "Send report to Microsoft"? I haven't decided exactly what kind of control I want over it, but I'd like to know whether it's even possible. Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238508
  - 4
    - Excel Automation I am automating Excel 2003 and trying to remove the default vertical page break, when I try to delete it I get an error, I can delete a page break that I added though. So since I cannot remove the pagebreak I tried to move it to the column I want it at using VPageBreaks(1).Location this does not work. Could someone explain how to get the page break where I want it. I have searched Google and the examples I have seen all adding pagebreaks and not moving. Every one have a great New Year Thanks Tom Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238506
  - 5
    - VFP 9 and Vista I had to buy a new computer with Vista on it not long ago and I upgraded to VFP 9.0 on that machine. I set beha to 8.0 on the Vista machine because of some problems. Anyway the rest of my machines are XP linked together with Linksys Router 10/100. My Vista machine is running the initial loading of the forms very slowly. This never happened before I upgraded. It is acting like a network problem (like it is searching for files on the xp machines). Eventually the forms will load and are quite fast once loaded. Any ideas would be appreciated. Could it be a setting in VFP 8 on the XP machines or in VFP 9 on the Vista machine? John Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238504
  - 6
    - editbox interactivechange I have a simple form with two edit boxes. Both of their control sources are memo fields from the same cursor. Even without making any changes, just tabbing to the various controls on the form, Editbox2 fires interactivechange when it loses focus, but Editbox1 does not. I don't know why this happens. Can someone explain it? Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238498
  - 7
    - FileToStr() & not enought memory... It seems that I've processed larger files than the one I'm testing this am -307947KB- but I'm consistently getting the not enough memory error. The task manager seem to show that there's plenty available... any tips? Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238494
  - 8
    - <alias> is not related to the current workarea Hi all, I'm doing my first VFP9 multi-detail-band report. I've got the master cursor related to detail cursors, but when I call the report, I get error 1165, crsDetail is not related to the current workarea. I quick check of the Set dialog shows that it clearly is related to the current workarea. Any ideas? In my detail band, "crsDetail" is in quotes as suggested in the manual. Curiously, I have another cursor, "crsNotes", that is also related to the master table but Fox doesn't complain about that (at least, it hasn't yet). Thanks, Eric Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238489
  - 9
    - gswin32.inf Hi all! I use the postscriptwriter gswin32 in my VFP-app. Where can I find the file gswin32.inf for downloading? Best regards Christina Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238483
  - 10
    - Calls between windows I have the need to trigger some events in windows which don't have focus and am not seeing any good way to accomplish this. The scenario is that if specific window is opened and a process started in that window, I need another window to know that the process is running and configure itself accordingly. I know I can use public variables, but they don't "trigger" an event such as a form refresh. I've tinkered with it, and it also does not seem possible for one form to run an event in another window... for example, if form1 could run a form2.refresh that would be a start. Any wisdom appreciated. Thanks in advance, Beverly Howard Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238478
  - 11
    - M`I 5`Persec ution ` BBC News casters Lie & D eny Theyre Wat ching Me MI5 Persecution: BBC Newscasters Lie & Deny They're Watching. Me Central to the persecution campaign waged against me for some. nine years now by the Security Service is their use of. the media, and in particular the broadcast media, to make clear to me that I. am under surveillance and being watched within my own home, even by BBC newscasters while they. read the news. This is really an act. of arrogance; MI5 and their tools in the television and radio are so sure that. they can never be caught, that they have many times made explicity clear on broadcast programmes that. they are as capable of seeing me as I am of seeing the. broadcast pictures. Even when they have known I am taping the programmes they still. carry on this practice; for examples of TVand radio. presenters caught "in action", see the Evidence area. of my website. If you wish to reply to this. article...... then please include your name and fax number! I. provide the means for recipients to send me their thoughts. on the topics discussed, but ask that you provide me with your fax. number or email address if you require a response. Also would you please send not more than one. or two pages, if by fax.. Thank-you! It started with a. Newscaster, and it continues with Newscasters today The very first incident in the story started with a reaction by. an ITN newscaster, Sue Carpenter, in June of 1990, almost. nine years ago now. She reacted to what she saw in my living room at home as she. read the news. My mother had brought an apple for me into the room,. whereupon the newsreader smirked and giggled,. apparently finding this funny. I couldn't believe what I was seeing. I. carried on watching news and other television programmes to see if presenters would show signs of. "interactive watching"; to. my surprise, this happened again and again. Unfortunately, I did not have my wits sufficiently about me to videotape. these programmes, and it is now almost impossible to obtain recordings dating back to. 1990. However,. I have been busy recording everything Ive watched the last couple of years, and the taping has yielded some nuggets, which you. will find if you point your Web browser at. the "evidence" area of my website, whose URL address is given above. Strangely it is not particularly the BBC who. are "after. me" at the moment (with the exception of occasional fire from Nicholas Witchell),. but that supposed paragon of virtue and decency Jon Snow of. Channel Four TV News (he actually works for ITN), who once claimed hed turned down MI5s offer of a tax-free salary. I will cover Snows. recent actions. in a future article. BBCs Hidden. Shame The. first ever Usenet post (internet newsgroup article) on the subject of the MI5 bugging /. BBC watching occurred, as stated in a previous article, in early May. 1995. It is reproduced here; Date: Thu May 4 18:27:24. 1995 Newsgroups:. alt.conspiracy Subject:. BBC's Hidden Shame Remember. the two-way televisions in George Orwell's 1984? The ones which watched you back?. Which you could never get rid of, only the sound could be. turned down? Well the country which brought Orwell into the world. has made his nightmare follow into the world. after him. Since 1990 the British have been waging war against one of their own citizens using. surveillance to invade privacy and a campaign of abuse. in the transmitted media in their efforts to humiliate their. "victim". I suppose "BBCs Hidden Shame" is more. of a wish than a fact. It may be hidden,. but the BBC and other media and security organisations seem to have no shame whatever in their anti-social, not to. say criminal, actions. Nor do the general public, who seem. quite happy to parrot the vilest obscenities without. much hesitation or apparently thought. Martyn Lewis,. Nicholas Witchell and the rest Most of the harassment. occurred in 1990-92, when I wasnt making any recordings, and the BBC wont release copies of current affairs. programmes from that period.... so although I. can remember there were many incidents in. that time, even many specifics, I cant dig up the actual programmes to flesh. out the bones. This year, there has been at least one incident with Nicholas Witchell. as newsreader, which I have successfully recorded and. digitized, i.e. converted into a computer Quicktime movie file. This. has not yet found its way onto my website. (Im a busy man, dontcha know) but you can be sure I. will let the readership of these articles know when that clip makes it onto the web. The Witchell clip was. recorded on Saturday 10 April 1999 at 7pm, and shows Witchell. trying to restrain his features from collapsing into a smirk.. First his upper lip quivers for several minutes, then with the non-excuse of a non-joke his entire face twists into a. grin. It looks as if. he finds me so funny, that he allows himself to submerge any pretence at professionalism in a sea. of MI5-inspired sarcasm and harassment. The two BBC newscasters whose reactions to. me I can remember most vividly over the years are Martyn Lewis and Nicholas Witchell.. I can remember thinking years ago that Michael Buerk. was also seeing me at home; and if the other two are watching then. there would be no reason why he wouldnt be doing the same; but in all honesty. I cannot remember a single clear instance of his reacting through facial. or verbal expression to me. I can remember several instances of Martyn Lewis reacting. to what he saw of me, however. In early 1992 I was watching the BBC news with. Lewis on a small black-and-white portable TV at my then home in Oxford. I. threw a term of abuse at Lewis; he flinched, then gave a grin and made a. comment from which I understood that he had been on my. side, but might have changed his mind as a result. of what Id just said to him. And in spring 1991 I remember Martyn Lewis. clearly reacting to what he saw of me at my then accommodation in Woking,. Surrey, by continuing to stare at some fixed point near the camera after the. news had finished - presumably this is where the monitor. interactively showing pictures of my room. was located. Why would BBC and other Newscasters. Watch and Harass Me, Watching Them? This. is a very difficult question, and I dont actually know the answer. It is a. matter of record that the Secret Services are very much part of the Establishment. The recent exposure of the "MI6. Agent List" on the internet, and its coverage in the newspapers, reveals. how much MI5 and MI6 are recruited from the ranks of the. Establishment. Obviously the relationship is bi-directional;. the Establishment influences MI5/MI6, but the secret services (well, perhaps. not so secret now we know who works for MI6!!!) also influence the machinery of power and. information dissemination i.e. media in this country. So they must. have a lot of covert leverage. with the BBC and ITN. Some of this leverage is obviously through. bribery. It is a matter of record. that MI5 tried some years ago to "buy" Jon Snow of Channel Four TV. He turned them down. - obviously they must have approached other media people as well, and from. the lack of other reports of people turning them down,. it may be presumed that some other journalists will have accepted the sugared carrots put before them. Ironically, Jon. Snow has been taking part in the recent "watching" actions against me -. but why he has allowed himself to be used by the secret services is something which. I do not know. Perhaps the Security. Service uses blackmail to twist arms of journalists into co-operating with them? I have always thought. there was something slightly odd about Martyn Lewiss. demeanour. At the time of the Ron Davies "rough trade" scandal it was reported that MI5 had known. all about Davies predilections and the sham of his pretence. to be a happily married man. Perhaps MI5 have been able to dig something up from Martyn. Lewiss private life to blackmail him. into acting on their behalf? And if there wasnt. anything before the "newscaster watching" started then there most certainly is something. now.... once theyve started watching, the newscasters will surely. wish their activities to remain covered-up, and co-operate. with the security service. "Newscaster Watching" Deliberately Constructed to Mimic. Schizophrenia Presumably. this is the first case in history of television journalists actually taking part in acts of real-time, live. spying and reacting against one of their viewers.. What you have to understand, though, is that I was quite mentally. healthy in June 1990, certainly relative to November 1992, when after two and a half years of harassment I was. finally admitted to hospital as an. out-patient. MI5 decided from the outset that they would make me. mad; they constructed the media harassment to resemble what would be reported by a person with mental illness; and then. they carried on years of abuse. to inflict on me the condition which they wished to use as an excuse to cover up their. abuses. I sold my portable TV. in autumn 1990 and stopped watching television regularly. I realise now that this may have been a. mistake. What I should have done was to watch TV and listen to the radio,. but tape-record everything and make a note of what each excerpt meant to me. I would. then be in a much stronger position as regards to. evidence that I am now. That is what I am trying to. do now, but unsurprisingly the TV/radio presenters have. stopped getting at me, now they know they are being recorded. When I started publicising my case on internet newsgroups in 1995, I. was met with the disbelief one might expect to be accorded to. a mentally ill person who talks about "newscaster watching". and media persecution. Some newsgroup participants thought. I had started a "troll", an invention made to obtain a reaction; one bright spark even suggested. a group of psychology students were behind the articles. But most people. thought the articles were symptomatic of derangement - and that is. exactly what MI5 want people to think.. MI5 chose me as a target because I was mildly mentally ill at the outset in 1990,. although I stress my illness then was very mild in comparison with November 1992, and because they. knew that enough abuse would (a) make me much more seriously ill, and (b) once I. was more ill, they would "get away" with a harassment. deliberately constructed to. look like the symptoms of paranoid schizophrenia. Martyn. Lewis Denies & Lies, But Wont in Writing In February 1997 I wrote to. BBC Viewer & Listener Correspondence and asked them. to investigate the claim that their newscasters had engaged in "real-time spying" on me.. They replied that they had asked Martyn Lewis and Michael Buerk whether they had engaged. in such practices, and that they. had both made verbal denials to VLC, but were refusing to put their denials. in writing. To me it looks. as if Lewis and Buerk are happy to lie verbally but not in writing, because written falsehoods would place them. unambiguously in the wrong, whereas they can try to. talk their way out of verbal lies if they are ever caught,. or perhaps even deny the verbal lies completely? If they lie without shame, then why would they have any shame about future. lies about. lying? BBC-VLC also. said that the BBC "would never engage in any form of surveillance activity" such as that described. Clearly Martyn Lewis. and the rest have lied to their own organisations. personnel about their criminal actions. So much for the "objective", "truthful". BBC, a nest of shabby. liars. Summons against the. BBC, for Nuisance caused by Newscaster Spying In March 1997 I issued a civil summons. against the BBC, seeking injunction against further "newscaster spying", and token damages for what. the BBC had done to me until that date. The purpose of the. summons was to try to "smoke out" the BBC, since obviously I did not have good. evidence which would be necessary for either. a civil or criminal case to be made against them. My summons was worded. as follows; 1. The. plaintiff is and was at all material times residing at [home address]. At some time prior to or. during June 1990, persons of unknown identity. entered Plaintiff's premises and installed concealed television equipment. in said premises. 2. A campaign of harassment was launched against the Plaintiff. by the persons of. unknown identity, which in part took the form of instigating harassment by BBC TV. newscasters (including specifically Michael Buerk and Martyn Lewis) as they read news bulletins, by making direct and. personal comments to. Plaintiff. 3. The campaigns purpose. was to subject Plaintiff to great mental stress and induce mental breakdown. As a result of. it Plaintiff did indeed suffer from. severe mental strain in 1990-97. 4. In order to avoid the. mental strain being caused to him the Plaintiff has been compelled. to stop watching BBC TV news. Defendant therefore committed the tort of. private nuisance, since normal use of home was interfered. with. 5. Plaintiff. claims a permanent injunction prohibiting further nuisance, and damages for nuisance suffered limited. to 5,000. Naturally, my attempt to smoke-out the. BBC and its lying newscasters failed. The BBCs litigation department. sought to have my summons struck out; and they succeeded in doing so, on the grounds. of my action "disclosing no reasonable. cause of action". I was also prevented from issuing further civil claims against the BBC without leave of. the Court. Apparently litigants-in-person frequently / usually. have their claims. struck out with this wording, regardless of the merit of their claims. BBC Suppresses my. Claims of "Watching by Newscasters" BBCs staff magazine Ariel ran my advert. "BBC Newsreaders Spying on my home". for one issue in the Personal category on 8/July/1997 before it was spotted and axed by editor Robin. Reynolds; please see webpage;. http://www.pair.com/spook/evidence/plaint/ariel.htm Clearly the BBC will. not allow claims of its wrongdoing to be made public in. the media channels it controls. On several occasions people said to my face that harassment. from the TV was happening. On. the first day I worked in Oxford, I spent the evening in the local. pub the Rose and Crown with the company's technical director Ian, and Phil, another employee. Ian made a few. references to me and said to Phil, as if in an. aside, "Is he the bloke who's been on TV?" to which Phil replied, "Yes,. I think so". The reader might think. that mere "watching" by newscasters etc might be a relatively. benign happening. But it is not; it is part of MI5s framework of harassment and lies. On many occasions the reactions of. the BBCs newscasters to me has been in the nature of sarcasm, implicit. contempt and abuse. This is visible in Witchells news programme mentioned above,. where he engages in abuse by laughing at me during. his newsreading. It was particularly visible in the early period of 1990-92, and as. late as Autumn 1993, when during a Newsnight. broadcast Jeremy Paxman interviewed a football person about soccer hooliganism, and the interviewee gave vent. to an unsubtle rant about "theyre idiots, theyre just. idiots, keep up the surveillance". Paxman. started grinning, showing he understood and was taking part in the. abuse being perpetrated on that programme. Conclusion The MI5 Persecution. started with harassment by television newscasters, and today harassment by. TV and radio presenters still forms a key part of MI5s activities against me. When this business started in June 1990. I was in relatively good health of mind.. Years of persecution by the secret police and their mouthpieces in. the state-run BBC and other media eroded my health until MI5 achieved their aim of seeing me. rendered mentally ill in November 1992. The diagnosis which was forced on me unfortunately. and ironically meant that my reports of the. harassment are disregarded, because the mentally. ill are second-class citizens in todays Britain. Yet TV and radio harassment continues, albeit in a reduced. form, despite my. taping all the programmes I watch, resulting in my being able to obtain and demonstrate objectively on the website instances. of media presenters attacking me. Unfortunately these recorded instances are quite. tenuous; I might. understand them, the presenters understand what it is theyre doing, but despite many thousands of people. knowing the truth of the "newscaster watching", the omerta continues and they continue to refuse to admit. the truth of the matter. It is a terrible indictment of British society. that there is not even one decent person willing to. speak out. I look forward to the day when the truth. does finally emerge, and the mass corruption which has allowed. the MI5 persecution to take place is finally purged and the Establishment. criminals caught and appropriately punished. 5329 Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238476
  - 12
    - M`I'5.Persec ution ` Fo ur Y ears of MI 5 Perse cution Pos ts on Interne t News groups Four Years of "MI5 Persecution". Posts on Internet Newsgroups For approximately the first three years of the MI5. persecution, from June 1990 until late 1992, I kept. as quiet as possible, in the hope that by not reacting, MI5s interest in me would decrease and they would simply go. away of. their own accord. This is the sort of behaviour some people employ against bullies; if. the bullies arent getting a reaction, then they might simply. go away and victimize someone else. Unfortunately, this tactic didnt work. The quieter I became, the. more shrill and hysterical the noise from the. Security Service operatives. For about. two years I didnt watch TV news at all. Yet this only heightened their obsessed fixation; they continued to follow. me wherever I went, they continued to induce harassment at work by managers. and fellow workers, and they continued to encourage me to commit suicide. They. seemed to regard my refusal to react as a crime which they. would have to "put right" by ever more extreme forms. of abuse. Finally, in 1995, I. changed tactics radically. Since late 1994 I had had accounts with internet. providers in Ontario, Canada. I discovered the cornucopia of internet newsgroups, on every. topic from consumer electronics, to politics. and legal topics, and I discovered online services such as. Compuserve and AOL. In May 1995, I made the first posting to the conspiracy. newsgroup, on the subject of "BBCs Hidden Shame". BBC's Hidden. Shame The. internet newsgroup discussion, which has now reached its fourth anniversary, started with an article in alt.conspiracy, which I. reproduce here. Date: Thu May. 4 18:27:24 1995 Newsgroups:. alt.conspiracy Subject: BBC's Hidden. Shame Remember the two-way televisions in George Orwell's 1984? The ones which watched. you back? Which you could never get rid of, only the sound could be. turned down? Well the country which brought Orwell into the. world has made his nightmare follow into the world after him. Since. 1990 the British have been waging war against one of their own citizens using surveillance to invade privacy and a. campaign of abuse in the transmitted media in their efforts. to humiliate their "victim". And the most remarkable thing. about it is that what they do is not even illegal - the UK has no laws. to protect the privacy of its citizens, nor does it proscribe harassment or abuse except in. the case of racial abuse. A lot of people in England know this to be going on, yet so far. they have maintained perfect "omerta";. not a sound, not a squeak has escaped into the English press, and for all the covert harassment absolutely nothing has. come out into the public domain. Have the. British gone mad? I think we should be told At this point, I did not name MI5 as. my persecutors. I was still unsure that they were the ones responsible. for the "psychological terrorism". In followup posts however I did name them; and the persecutors. have never denied the claim; so I think my guess is valid. (The Security. Service Tribunal in 1997 have said "no determination in your. favour was made", but it is. a well established fact that MI5 lies routinely to the Tribunal which has never found in favour. of a plaintiff, so no conclusions can be drawn from. this.) This. first post was made to alt.conspiracy, but further posts were made to the UK-local. newsgroups, in particular uk.misc but also uk.legal and uk.politics. (which is now called uk.politics.misc). Some time ago I tried to. take the battle to the Compuserve forums, UKPOLITICS (which is now called UKCURRENT - current affairs),. but my articles were censored by the forum. operators. Such censorship is impossible on the internet newsgroups. Police. Refuse to Act I have complained several times to the. Metropolitan Police, who have each time refused. to help. From: Green. <Green@guidion.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't the British. Police Doing Their Job? Reply-To:. Green@guidion.demon.co.uk Date: Sun Apr . 7 21:13:30 1996 In. article <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net> . bu765@torfree.net "Mike Corley" writes: >Last. Easter (1995) I went into the local police station in London and spoke to >an officer about the harassment against me. But. I couldn't provide tangible >evidence; what people. said, in many cases years ago, is beyond proof, and >without something to support my statements I cannot. expect a police officer to >take the. complaint seriously. This in. itself dos not suggest that the police have it in for you. The old bill operates on extremely tight spending limits forced on them by that. pillock Michael Howard, and without evidence,. they often have higher priorities than chasing something that. cannot go to court. I doubt that the police are actually being leant on, but they probably realise that. if they looked into this, they would be leant on hard. The met. always stays away from anything that looks like it has Defence, Security or secret service interest. already, because they realise that they are below these government. agencies in the general pecking. order. If I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping on me,. they would show me the door without even looking at my evidence, because that. bored desk seargant with only five years to go before he retires doesn't. want to start fucking about with somebody who has incurred the wrath. of Stella Rimington. He would rather deal with the lost dogs and driving licence producers, eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and. piss off home at the end of his shift than have. some high ranking spook having a go at his boss and. getting him a bollocking. In short, you have. earned much sympathy but little surprise. Just remember that saying about the enemy of your. enemies. Most recently, I. wrote in March 1999 to Charing Cross Police Station CID. They did not. acknowledge or reply to my letter. When I phoned them up, the detective Id written to treated me. to a sadly not unusual display of police bigotry, with an uneducated rant about "your. paranoid rubbish". It would be nice to think that such uneducated. bigotry is something other than wholly typical of police. behaviour, but unfortunately that is an illusion that. is rapidly dispelled. Uncorruptible. Jon Snow of Channel Four News From previous articles the. reader will know what I think Jon Snow has recently been. watching me while he reads Channel Four News in the evening. Recently I digitized a few moments of. one such broadcast, where his face twists into a smile, without. there being anything in the news broadcast to cause merriment. Here. is a usenet post from some time ago on MI5s "bought and paid for". tools in the so-called "free" press. Peter Harding (harding@ermine.ox.ac.uk). wrote: : I was at speakers' corner on Sunday. There. was one chap who was bellowing : about. something or other, I don't know what, but one thing he said to :. someone caught my ear: : "BBC,. MI5, same thing." Can't disagree with. that sentiment. Wasn't it. documented that MI5 sometimes "bought" journalists and broadcasters? I remember reading a report by some jouralist who had been offered an. extra tax-free income by. MI5 to become their covert mouthpiece, and had refused. ............................................................................. > : >mouthpiece,. and had refused. >. : > : It was Jon. Snow of Channel 4. > > Was it reported in any. of the papers? It has been reported several times. The. most recent was in Private Eye, a few months back. As I recall they. also wanted information from him; journalists would be a natural choice. for members of the Security Service and the Secret Intelligence Service for. information sources. > It might be interesting to. see what he had to say regarding their > attempt to recruit. him. He was most concerned that many others would have. accepted such an offer. However, we can probably make an educated guess as. to some of those who accepted: Nigel West (Rupert Allason, MP) and. Chapman Pincher would come near to. the top of the list. -- \/ David Boothroyd. Socialist and election analyst. Omne ignotum. pro magnifico. British Elections. and Politics at http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~laws/election/home.html I. wish I was in North Dakota. Next General Election must be before 22nd May '97 The House of Commons now : C 324, Lab 272, L Dem. 25, UU 9, PC 4, SDLP 4, SNP 4, UDUP 3, Ind 1, Ind UU 1, Spkrs 4. Government majority = 1. Telephone. Tate 6125. Corrupt. Security Service agents steal millions from taxpayers Money is of course a factor in the grand equation which. is the MI5 persecution. It costs money for the. Security Service to "buy" people in the media etc. But that is only. a small part of their expenditure of taxpayers resources. Most of the expenditure. is directly on the salaries if the agents involved; and in this post I. put forward the theory that MI5 are trying to draw out their involvement for. as long as possible, very cynically, to maximise their income and. line their own pockets. At each. stage they have tried to pretend that I am something out of the ordinary. Either I was very stupid. ("he's an idiot") or very clever ("he's like a genius"). Either. I was a threat to Western civilization (Levin once referred to me as the next Hitler). or I was completely defenceless ("a soft toy"). Now, it should be obvious to any person with common-sense. that I am not out of the ordinary in any way. I have an IQ which is. average for the Web, I am racially white European, and there are plenty of other people with. schizophrenia or epilepsy out there who haven't been targeted for MI5 attention, so why. me? I think the. answer is that the MI5 agents who harass me have cynically exploited the situation by painting. me as extraordinary in order to assure themselves of well-paid employment funded by the. ordinary British taxpayer. To put it bluntly, they are stealing millions of pounds from the. taxpayer to feed their own pockets. This assertion is supported by the. observation that it's the same agents who are doing the harassment. Six months ago in a local hospital. I was harassed by someone whose face I had seen (he had stared straight at. me aggressively, at the time I just thought it was some nutter but it turns out he was one of "them") aboard a KLM flight a. couple of years ago. It's presumably been the same people most of the time. I've seen. the way contractors act when they. don't want their positions terminated. Would these agents really want to lose their well-paid. employment harassing me? Presumably they are promising. their bosses a "breakthrough" (ie my demise) real-soon-now and have been for the last seven years, while all the while these MI5. agents skim millions off. the taxpayer. I. wouldn't mind a job like that. Perhaps if I persecute myself a little bit, like standing in front. of a mirror and shouting mindless obscenities, do you reckon I'd get a slice. of the caky Service Tribunal. This year Nick Brooks, current Tribunal Secretary, confirmed. to me that he could not think of a single case where. the Tribunal had found in favour of a complainant. Here is my usenet. post from two years ago. Subject: MI5:. "It wasn't us" Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.legal Organization: Toronto. Free-Net "The Security Service. Tribunal have now investigated your complaint and have asked me to inform you that no determination in your. favour has been made on your. complaint." Signed ER Wilson, Tribunal. Secretary Well that's a relief then. All that. spamming for nothing eh. Gaw blimey, if they say. they're not doing it then it can't be them, can it? In a recent letter to Mr Brooks I. expressed the opinion that the Tribunal were unable to fulfil. their responsibilities in the face of MI5 falsehoods. Nevertheless, I do intend to make. another complaint to the Tribunal. in the near future, despite the Tribunal appearing to be a toothless. watchdog. Discrimination against a Unit. Minority MI5 have been very clear. in their instructions as to what I should do. They have openly shouted at. me the word "suicide", and also from the other abuse it is clear. that they want my existence terminated. This point is covered. in more detail in a previous article. The following post. describes the xenophobic nature of MI5s campaign against me. They have refined their bigotry down to a unit minority, yet. they make use of the discrimination against the mentally ill. which is a feature of current British. society. Subject:. Re: MI5 says "Kill Yourself" Newsgroups:. uk.misc,uk.legal,uk.politics.misc,uk.media References:. <zlsiida.4248.3258FE24@fs1.mcc.ac.uk> <53eeev$cmg@axalotl.demon.co.uk> Organization: Toronto. Free-Net Distribution: iain@hotch.demon.co.uk (Iain. L M Hotchkies) wrote: >Indeed. If you've ever. had a 'conversation' with someone suffering >from florid schizophrenia,. you'll know how difficult it can be to >'argue' with. them. I don't have florid symptoms. But I'm in a. difficult situation, because those people who don't know, aren't going to believe,. and those who do, they just go along with the crowd. It's never a good idea to go against. the grain, and the grain here is defined by interests in the. establishment and the media. Even people who could say out loud what was happening. won't, because then there's a risk that they'll be seen as. traitors and ostracised. Usually this type of 'hidden abuse' is. racial and targetted at a racial minority within a country. You keep the minorities out of the good. jobs, but you don't admit discrimination exists. It happens everywhere, not. just in Britain. The persecution that is going on now is in. reality a refined form of racism. Instead. of "nigger" it's "nutter", and abusing the mentally ill is still socially acceptable today. In 50. years it might not be, but today there isn't any social or. legal sanction against it. So really they've refined racial harassment. down to a minority of one. The words may be different, but the methods are. the same. 3859 Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238475
  - 13
    - M`I,5-P ersecution ` MI 5 Wa ste Taxp ayer M illions on P ointless Hate-Campa ign MI5 Persecution. Update: Friday 30 April, 1999 If You Intend. To Reply, Please Read This Please.... keep your response to one page!. Faxes over. a page or two will be deleted without. being read. Somewhere between 0 and. 100% The last few. days there have been no clear recordable instances of abuse.. However, while travelling on the Underground, while walking around near my home and going to friends. homes, I am constantly troubled by thoughts that those people over there might be about to get. at me; that the couple sitting in the. opposite seats laughing are in fact laughing at me; et. cetera, et cetera. A comment by a scientist to the BSE inquiry sticks in. my mind. He described the possible scale of the epidemic as. "between 0% and 100%". It might not be happening, it. might not happen at all, to any discernable degree..... or it might be total. Without clear recording, which seems to have become impossible the last couple of weeks, there is no. way of knowing whether the harassment really is continuing,. whether we have entered a temporary hiatus, or whether perhaps it has. perhaps stopped for now. But for the time being I think. there arent any reasons to dicontinue these faxes. I. only re-started them six weeks ago in response to a resumption of MI5 harassment; and I think I will need. to be more convinced of absence of persecution before. I discontinue my complaints. The Newscasters. are still watching In the last few weeks there have. been at least a couple of fairly overt instances of. "interactive watching" by newscasters. I reported this in a previous "MI5 Persecution. Update". These instances are really very rare compared to 1990-91, when there. were many dozens. of such occurrences. Undoubtedly the reduction is due to my practice of videotaping everything. I see. Recently I had the opportunity of showing this years "happenings" (Jon Snow/Nicholas Witchell) to. my psychiatrist, and he agreed that in both cases. the newscasters were expressing merriment without visible. cause, and that objectively it might be possible for my claims to be true. - although of course other people reported similar thoughts. to him, and this thinking is usually a symptom of. illness. Read About the MI5. Persecution on the World Wide Web The March 1998 issue (number 42) of .net Magazine. reviews the website describing it as an "excellent site". Since August. 11, 1996 over 50,000 people have. browsed this website. You are encouraged to read the web. pages which include a FAQ (frequently asked. questions) section outlining the nature of the persecutors, their methods of harassment through the. media, people at work and among. the general public an evidence section, which. carries audio and video clips of media and workplace harassment, rated according to how directly I think they refer to. me objective descriptions of the state security agencies. involved scanned texts of the complaints I. have made to media and state security agencies. involved posts which have been made to. netnews over the last four years on this topic Keith Hill MP. (Labour - Streatham), my elected representative, as ever refuses to. help. MI5 Waste Taxpayer. Millions on Pointless Hate-Campaign Recently I was talking. to an independent observer about the nature and purpose of the perceived campaign of persecution. against me. The person I spoke to,. a highly intelligent man, said he was struck by the utter pointlessness. of the perceived campaign against me. He also said that, if my theories. were in fact true, many people would have to be involved, in the surveillance itself, and in the technical side. of the delivery of information from my home to TV studios for example, if the. "interactive watching". were happening as described. He voiced these thoughts without any prompting from me; but both I and other observers had arrived. at pretty much the same conclusions, some years. ago. I saw a team of four men at Toronto Airport in. 1993 To carry out the surveillance. alone, full-time, would employ four or five men, or their equivalent. in terms of man-hours. Each man would "work" an eight-hour shift, so you would need. at least three men doing the surveillance, plus. a connecting link / manager. An indicator that this estimate is correct arrived in 1993, when I was accosted by one of. a group of four men. at Toronto Airport; he said, laughing, "if he tries to run away well find him".. Plainly these were the men who had been involved in the intrusive surveillance of. me for the preceding three years. On other occasions, I have seen the same man on two or three. occasions. On one such occasion, at Ottawas Civic Hospital in. November 1996; he gave his name to the doctor as. "Alan Holdsworth" or some such; my hearing is not very good sometimes and I am not sure of the. surname, although I am sure "Alan". was his first name. I saw exactly the same man again in Ottawa, at the airport, in July 1998. Obviously,. other people must be "working" with this person; he would not be the sole agent. employed in this case. Usenet. readers views on the Cost to MI5 of Running the Campaign Here's what a couple of other. people on internet newsgroups / Usenet (uk.misc) had to say regarding the cost. of running such an operation... PO: >Have some sense, grow. up and smell reality. What you are talking about PO: >would take loads of. planning, tens of thousands of pounds and lots of PO: >people involved in the planning,. execution and maintenance of it. You PO: >must have a very high opinion of yourself to think you are worth. it. and...... PM: >But why? And why you? Do you realize how much it would. cost to keep PM: >one. person under continuous surveillance for five years? Think about PM: >all the man/hours. Say they _just_ allocated a two. man team and a PM: >supervisor.. OK., Supervisor's salary, say, #30,000 a year. Two men, PM: >#20,000 a year each. But they'd need to work in shifts. -- so it would PM:. >be six men at #20,000 (which with on-costs would work out at more like PM: >#30,000 to. the employer.) PM:. > PM: >So, we're talking #30,000. x 6. #180,000. plus say, #40,000 for the PM: >supervisor. #220,000. Then you've got the hardware involved.. And PM: >any transcription that needs doing. You don't think the 'Big. Boss' PM: >would listen to hours and. hours of tapes, do you. PM:. > PM: >So, all in all, you couldn't actually do the job for much less. than PM: >a quarter million a year. Over five years.. What are you doing that makes PM: >it worth the while of the. state to spend over one and a quarter million PM:. >on you? Those are pretty much the sort. of calculations that went through my head once I stopped to consider what it must be costing them. to run this operation. At the very least, a. quarter million a year - and probably much more, given the. intrusive and human-resource-intensive methods employed. Times nine years.. Equals well over two million pounds - and probably. much, much more. Its wasteful for someone with my. skills to be unemployed The wastefulness of the MI5 campaign against me. is not just that of futile expenditure on their side. It is also extremely wasteful for. someone with my talents to. be unemployed and on a disability pension. I am highly qualified in numerate. disciplines, yet am unable to work, specifically because of the MI5 hate-campaign. against me. It is a terrible waste of resources for a supposedly efficient economy. like that of the UK to be squandering the talents. of a skilled and capable worker. I made every effort to remain. in employment for as long as I could, but ultimately I was. defeated by MI5s employment of massive resources specifically. targeted on my workplaces with the sole aim of seeing me evicted from those workplaces. You might expect. this sort of behaviour from the Stasi or some other secret police. force in a communist country where labour is. cheap, and the governments aim on seeing its citizens confined; but for a supposedly free and efficient. economy like Britains, the wastefulness resulting both. directly and indirectly from the Security Services activities is simply criminal, and should never. be allowed. The international dimension means the costs. are multiplied many times overoer had any sense, then. they have surely taken leave of them over the last. nine years. Four years. of persecution in Canada The persecution re-started within. less than five minutes of my arrival in Canada, as documented above, and in. the "frequently asked questions" article on the website. The words,. "if he tries to run away well find him" spoken by one of the harassers at Toronto Airport. are now imprinted on my. mind. A year later I emigrated to Canada, intending to find. a job and settle there, hoping that MI5s interest in. me might dim with time. I did manage to find work there, but my hopes of avoiding Security. Service interest were ground. into dust. As detailed above, I saw the same man in November 1996 and July 1998, both times. in Ottawa. Apart from these encounters, there were numerous incidents between 1994 and 1998 of harassment, of. an identical. nature and in most cases using identical words to what had occurred in the UK. It. became quite clear to me that the permanent surveillance and harassment operation which MI5 had subjected. me to in England was. being continued. For. a team of four or five men to be employed overseas must cost a lot more than if. they operate in their home country. And for MI5 to continue the operation for a period of over. four years, continuously, must cost many hundreds. of thousands of pounds. This confirms my belief that the state is funding the campaign against mehat the. Security Service receives current annual funding of #160M. Divided by. 1850 staff, works out at #86,000. But the unit annual cost of each "watcher" must. be much higher than this, especially. given the frequently mobile and overseas nature of their actions of the last few years. A very. conservative figure might be a little. over #100,000 pa for each of a team of five people, or half a million pounds per year. For nine years, so far. So. the most conservative estimate of the. surveillance element alone is perhaps four or five million pounds since. 1990. This. guesstimate is of course theoretical - I am not privy to inside details of. how MI5 split their funding. But to take some other examples, the cost of a US counter-surveillance specialist per day. is USD 5,000. Even if the agents permanently assigned to. me are not of this calibre - even if they. employ specialists when difficult work planting bugs etc is encountered - their. salary and support costs must still be very high. The individual agents are doing well for themselves as. they are well-paid to exercise psychopathic instincts. which in any sane society would see them in prison;. but the taxpayers who must fund this terribly wasteful exercise are being "done" out. of hundreds of thousands of pounds each. year. It. must be emphasised that the above estimates are highly conservative. Besides the surveillance operation, it must. carry a high cost in man-hours to propagate covert slanders through the population;. to setup and maintain the "interactive. watching" links to TV and radio stations, which these organisations. continue desparately to "lie and deny"; and to induce antipathy in co-workers which would. not otherwise exist. Why they are wasting Millions of. Pounds on a "Nobody from South London" As remarked in the. prologue to this article, it is really most extraordinary that. the Security Service spends a chunk of its budget, every year for nine years. so far, on a meaningless campaign against a "nobody from South London". That they. are spending such a large amount of money has been confirmed to. me on several occasions, usually by oblique references to "its costing. this country millions". The supposed "logic" behind. the persecution is that MI5 wish to avoid their harassment of me, and the involvement of. the UK media, to be made public; yet as the reader will appreciate that is. a circular argument, "theyre doing it because they want to keep it secret and avoid humiliation. for themselves and their country" begs the question, "why. did they start doing it in the first place?", to which in truth I myself do not. know the answer. Plainly MI5. with its rich budget can afford half a million pounds a year to waste on a "nobody from South London". Some. time ago I was talking to a British. surveillance professional on Compuserve who told me "this work costs a lot of. money and is usally because the person I am following has done something (usually criminal) to warrant all this money and time. being spent." Yet in this particular case it is. plainly not the "victims fault" that the harassment is. taking place. The hate-campaign against me is completely the creation of the obsessive psychologies of the. MI5 agents who have made themselves my persecutors; it is. obviously a "personal" campaign for them, and for years they misuse. taxpayer funding to feed their insane,. unnatural and fixated fantasies. 2389 Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238474
  - 14
    - M'I`5 Persec ution , Compari ng th e MI 5 Persecuti on wit h Germ an Fin al Soluti on MI5. Persecution Update: Friday 16 April, 1999 If You Intend To Reply,. Please Read This Please..... keep your response to one page!. Faxes over a page or two will be deleted. without being read. BBC newscaster Nicholas Witchell. cant stop himself laughing During 1990-91 there were very many instances of. "interactive television" where newscasters. and other TV presenters saw on a screen before. them what was happening in my home, and reacted, frequently by laughing at me. During this period I unfortunately did. not record these programmes. For the last. year or two, I have been recording everything I watch, and there has been a drastic. decrease in such incidents. However, on. occasion, television presenters do still engage in "interactive watching" and. react to what they see. This has been evident with Jon Snow of Channel Four News recently - a particularly. interesting case,. since it has been established that he cannot be corrupted by money (it is well-documented that MI5 offered him a tax-free. salary and he turned. them down). I wonder what device MI5 are using to encourage him to do the. "interactive watching"? On. Saturday 10 April 1999 at 7pm, Nicholas Witchell on BBC2 News reacted when he saw that I was watching the programme,. and I have his reactions stored safely on videotape. I have watched. this tape several times and I am entirely confident that my evaluation of his reactions is correct.. For several minutes his upper lip quivered in mirth as he attempted to. keep a straight face.. Then finally his self-control evaporated through the excuse of a weak. joke and his face collapsed into a grin. The strange thing is that. I dont know why he was laughing at me, what I had done recently to "deserve". to be laughed at. The MI5 persecutors usually manage to invent some justification as to why people should. laugh at and/or abuse me ("hes an X", "it was so funny". etc), so Mr Witchell could have been laughing for any number of reasons. Perhaps he found. the views. I have been expressing in these articles amusing? I suppose if youre paid enough money and ordered to laugh then even the. most innocuous thing becomes. funny. Jon Snow of Channel Four News cant stop. himself smirking, either. On 12 February 1999 I. was watching Channel Four News presented by Jon Snow.. As usual, I was recording the programme, so that if anything out of the ordinary happened,. Id be able to go back and watch it again. Now, Jon Snow, by his own. claim, is uncorruptible. He says he turned down an offer of a substantial tax-free salary from. MI5 - they wanted to make him their mouthpiece, and he told them where. to get off. So you will. be most surprised to learn that Jon Snow "interactively watched" me that. evening, and on many other evenings. Approximately fifteen minutes into the programme, he announced. that the US President would be making a live appearance. at about 7.30pm; I looked at the clock on the mantelpiece; and Snow saw me looking at the clock,. and visibly tried to suppress a. smirk. Uncorruptible, are you, Mister Snow? If. not money, then why are you watching me, Mister Snow? Are they forcing you to watch. me? Cant you turn the monitor off,. Mister Snow? Keith Hill MP (Labour. - Streatham), my elected representative, as ever refuses. to help. Comparing. the MI5 Persecution with German "Final Solution" It might seem offensive to compare the mass murder. of millions of civilians in wartime with the peacetime persecution. of merely one person. Yet the comparison. has been coursing through my mind for several years. now, because the brutality of German intent to "sub-humans" is very much comparable to the brutality. of British intent to someone they vituperate and term "not up to British. standards". The methods may differ, but the persecutors. mindset is the same. The. Germans first targeted the mentally disabled, too During WW2 millions. of ethnic Russians, Poles, Jews, mentally ill, gypsies and other minorities were. rounded up and murdered in purpose-built camps by. the German regime, in the name of "racial superiority". Fifty years on, the British Secret Police, MI5, instituted a campaign. of mass hysteria; but in their cowardice, limited their activities to. one single victim. It is instructive to note that the early. German "cleansing" effort was directed primarily not at Jews, but at the. mentally ill. The Nazis set up the. T4 project in the thirties to "cleanse" away 70,000 mentally disabled people, including schizophrenics and epileptics. After WW2. the Jews with their media influence used the reaction from. the holocaust to roll back anti-semitism in the Western countries; however,. the mentally ill are today still a persecuted group in. the modern Western world as they were under the Nazis (the current Jewish home secretary in the UK. intends to bring in laws for. incarceration without any criminal charge for some mentally. ill people - he protects his own minority, but does nothing for the other. minorities in todays society), and this continuing bias forms a central. cause for the current acts of persecution in the UK. Widespread knowledge of what is happening to the. "un-British" minority In both the German persecution of the thirties and. early forties, and the current British persecution, many, many people. are well aware of whats happening. There is widespread complicity through. inaction of populace; and in a substantial proportion of the. mainstread population, the persecution had/has widespread enthusiastic. support; yet in both the German case in the 1940s. and the British today, the existence of persecution is a mass secret which. must be never admitted out loud. In the recent Lawrence case this "secret bigotry" has been. termed "institutionalised racism",. and that is a very good word for what the British are doing today. The persecutory attitudes and omerta regarding them are so. deeply ingrained in the national psyche that they define the national. mood During WW2 many Germans knew minorities were. disappearing, and through inaction. quietly condoned their government's mass murder of "un-German" minorities and inferior "foreigners"; and in. the 1990s, similarly, many. English people know what the MI5 British Secret Police have. been doing, and not only condone it, but actively take part, because of xenophobia against the "un-British" unit minority that. is the target of "British" actions. This. attitude by the British persecutors has been made explicit through the words "he's. not up to British standards"; the British seem to have found their very own. "untermenschen" to victimise. Why these. obsessive "holy wars" happen This type of. aggression occurs when the majority is threatened or humiliated in. some way, economically, militarily or culturally. In pre-WW2 Germany the threat was primarily. economic and military, following Germany's humiliating defeat in the first world war and the. reparations it was forced to. pay. In modern Britain, one might guess that the majority English who are behind the persecution feel pressured. by the swiftly diminishing status of Britain in the world,. and the rapidly increasing coloured colonisation of their country,. which in time will see the ethnic English a minority in their own land, and their more antisocial. elements, unable to reply to the obvious. threat, instead project their aggression onto. another, weaker, unit minority In both cases there is. a whiff of "holy war" or irrational obsession with the persecution. Certainly the German behaviour fifty years. ago bordered on the not-quite-sane, and the current British. behaviour towards their chosen victim. is strongly tinged with a leave-taking of reason. And the choices open to the victims are the same,. since MI5 will never allow me to escape them, "if he tries to run away we'll find him", just like. the commandant of. Auschwitz telling the new arrivals, "the only escape is through. the chimney". The Victim Will Destroy Us if We Dont Destroy Him. First The persecutors propaganda is the. same. Fifty years ago the Germans said, "if we don't do it to the Jews then the. Jews will do it to us"; and MI5's propaganda in the early nineties. concentrated on their victim as a "monster" aesome. "untermenschen" minority. "We are decent fellows" say the. Brutal Persecutors During the course of researching this article I read part of the. very interesting book, "Hitler - A Study in. Tyranny", by Alan Bullock. This volume contains a quote. from Himmler on the "Final Solution"; "Most of you know what it means when a hundred corpses are lying. side by side, or five hundred or one thousand. To. have stuck it out, and at the same time .... to have remained decent. fellows, that is what has made us hard. This is a page of glory in our history. which has never been written and is never to be. written." In the MI5 persecution, too, there is a thread of deliberate brutality. to the sick and vulnerable, while the persecutors maintain that. "we are decent fellows". There is. almost a conscious schizophrenia in the self-attitudes of the Security Service. operatives and those in the public who they employ against me, which reflects the. contradiction evident in the. German attitude above. On the one hand, they stoop to the lowest and most base behaviour; yet at the. same time, the MI5 operatives tell themselves that since they are. civilised British people, then surely they must by definition be. "decent fellows". Any indecency is made the fault of the. victim; "hes making us persecute him, so we need feel no guilt". Yet the. conduct is atypical of the way these peoples see their normal modes of behaviour. Befslaughter was not. typical of normal German behaviour up. to that point. Similarly, the current MI5 abuse goes against the grain of British self-image as being. "reserved" and "decent", since they are using terms of abuse. which are common among blacks and other supposedly less-developed races, but not. among the English. Conclusion The ultimate aim of both persecutions. is the humiliation and physical extinction of the persecuted group.. The Germans did this in a very direct way; the British Secret Police MI5 are. acting indirectly and relying on self-extinction of their target, because in peacetime. and in the current somewhat false climate of. "political correctness" more direct methods are impossible. If MI5 undertook more direct action the mass. "omerta" would be broken. I have written this article with sincerity to. show how a historically recent persecution in another country parallels what is. being done in this country today. In both. cases, the evil-doers are of their countries establishments, and rely on. widespread tacit support to maintain the persecution and omerta around it. While. the holocaust was undoubtedly the greater evil, it is important. to be aware of the fact that had the Germans not been defeated fifty. years ago, their plans would have gone through to total completion. In Britain today no force threatens. the "permanent government" of. which the Security Service forms a part; and it looks very unlikely that the wrongs perpetrated by the. MI5 secret police will ever be revealed to public. view, and the British secret state brought to justice for. its evil actions. 919 Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238473
  - 15
    - VFP BindEvent to an specific file operation? This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C845C9.805C3A10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi All, From my VFP application I need to detect when an specific file is being = saved and closed. Does anybody knows how to do this? The file name could be C:\TEMP\MyFileName.txt Thanks! --=20 Edhy ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C845C9.805C3A10 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16587" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Hi All,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>From my VFP application I need to detect when an = specific file=20 is being saved and closed.  Does anybody knows how to do = this?</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>The file name could be=20 C:\TEMP\MyFileName.txt</FONT></DIV><FONT size=3D2> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Thanks!<BR>-- <BR>Edhy</DIV> <DIV></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0012_01C845C9.805C3A10-- Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238465
  - 16
    - SQL Errors: Where is the error? I have just finished -- I hope I have finished -- some changes to one program of mine that has some hairy SQL. One of the SQL statments is 40 lines long. Granted it could be shorter vertically, but it is still 852 characters long. Occasionally -- read "All too often" -- while wrestling with this program, there would be an error in my SQL syntax. VFP is not terribly helpful with such error messages as Syntax error. Command is missing required clause. These are not terribly useful. Sometimes, I have hunted for minutes before realising that, say, a comma was missing. What do you do to quickly find errors in long SQL statements? Sincerely, Gene Wirchenko Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation: I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices. Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238461
  - 17
    - Where to get rich text control richtx32.ocx for Vista? I thought richtx32.ocx was automatically installed with Windows, but apparently not since my app can't find it when installed on Vista. Where can I get an official copy of this thing to include in my installs? I am reluctant to just grab the one out of my system32 directory. Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238449
  - 18
    - messagebox with timeout weirdness Do this: MESSAGEBOX('message',16,'title',100000) Which causes a messagebox to be displayed with a 100 second timeout. Look at your taskbar, notice the extra icon on it. It has a fox icon, and it's caption is the title of your messagebox. Now click on the VFP desktop wihle the messagebox is still displayed. Notice that the messagebox is no longer visible because it is now behind VFP. You can't do anything in VFP while the messagebox is active - but you can't see the messagebox either. So, my question - how can I use messagebox with a timeout and prevent it from being hidden by my app? If you don't use the timeout parameter, it works as expected. If you use the timeout parameter, it can be hidden by the app, the user does not see it, their app is non- responsive, and the next thing you know you have data losses because they alt-ctrl-del and killed the app because they didn't notice the message box hiding behind the app. This appears to be how messageboxes have worked since VFP7, but I've never had the need to use the timeout parameter until now. Making the current form or _screen modal doesn't change this. Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238439
  - 19
    - Scanning 2D barcode in an EditBox control This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C84324.5C789870 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi, I have an application which scans 2D barcode like the one on US Vehicle = Registration Cards. I am using a keyboard scanner which works just fine = when scanning into a regular Text document, but when scanning in a VFP = form's EditBox control, some LineFeed characters are missing, please see = the sample data below: Sample from a Text document (OK) @ =20 AAMVA36001006VH00770060RG01370149ZV02860042ZR03280066ZY03940003ZZ03970016= VH VAD2T1BR32E27C748905 VAKTOYT VAL2007 Sample from a an EditBox (Not Good) @AAMVA36001006VH00770060RG01370149ZV02860042ZR03280066ZY03940003ZZ0397001= 6VH VAD2T1BR32E27C748905 VAKTOYT VAL2007 As you may notice, the sample data scanned in the VFP editbox is = ommiting the LineFee/Carrier Return characters after the "@" sign. What may be causing this behavior in VFP form? I did the same test in a = .NET form without a problem as well as a regular text file. Thanks! --=20 Edhy ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C84324.5C789870 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <!DOCTYPE HTML PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.0 Transitional//EN"> <HTML><HEAD> <META http-equiv=3DContent-Type content=3D"text/html; = charset=3Diso-8859-1"> <META content=3D"MSHTML 6.00.6000.16587" name=3DGENERATOR> <STYLE></STYLE> </HEAD> <BODY bgColor=3D#ffffff> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Hi,</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>I have an application which scans 2D barcode like = the one on=20 US Vehicle Registration Cards.  I am using a keyboard scanner which = works=20 just fine when scanning into a regular Text document, but when scanning = in a VFP=20 form's EditBox control, some LineFeed characters are missing, please see = the=20 sample data below:</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Sample from a Text document (OK)</FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT face=3D"Courier New"=20 size=3D2>@<BR> <BR>AAMVA36001006VH00770060RG01370149ZV02860042ZR0328= 0066ZY03940003ZZ03970016VH<BR>VAD2T1BR32E27C748905<BR>VAKTOYT<BR>VAL2007<= /FONT></DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2></FONT> </DIV> <DIV> <DIV><FONT size=3D2>Sample from a an EditBox (Not=20 Good)</FONT></DIV></DIV><FONT size=3D2> <DIV><FONT=20 face=3D"Courier = New">@AAMVA36001006VH00770060RG01370149ZV02860042ZR03280066ZY03940003ZZ03= 970016VH<BR>VAD2T1BR32E27C748905<BR>VAKTOYT<BR>VAL2007</FONT></DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>As you may notice, the sample data scanned in the VFP editbox is = ommiting=20 the LineFee/Carrier Return characters after the "@" sign.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>What may be causing this behavior in VFP form?  I did the same = test in=20 a .NET form without a problem as well as a regular text file.</DIV> <DIV> </DIV> <DIV>Thanks!</DIV> <DIV><BR>-- <BR>Edhy</DIV> <DIV></FONT> </DIV></BODY></HTML> ------=_NextPart_000_0020_01C84324.5C789870-- Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238427
  - 20
    - Problem printing reports in color I should be most grateful to have help from the experts. VFP8 SP1, Windows XP Pro SP2 I have a series of reports which have various items in color. Preview on screen is perfect with colors appearing correctly. When printing either to printer or PDF the output is always in black and white. Can anyone suggest how I can obtain color output to printer / PDF? Thank you for guidance. -- James Lyall. Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238412
  - 21
    - Another (hopefully simple) VFP 7 report writer question Hello and thank for the help. Also, happy holidays and happy new year to all. In the form designer, for most objects, you have top, left, height, and width. Is there anything similar for the report writer? How do you make small adjustments to a box or line to line it up with other objects in the report. I can easily move the box with the mouse but I can't make small adjustments to its size. I turned off "Snap to Grid" but the adjustments still have to be made with the mouse and it is difficult. Is there any way to numerically specify the width of an object in the report designer? Thanks, Jeff Tag: VFP 9: Filters Implemented with SQL Tag: 238407
  - 22
    - a simple bug x = "&&" gives "Command contai