Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2)

TheMSsForum.com: The Microsoft Software Forum

The MSS Forum ‹ Exchange Fox
- Archive
  - Biz
  - MCSE
  - CRM
  - Drivers
  - Framework
  - ADO
  - ASP
  - Compact
  - Forms
  - Dotnet
  - C#
  - VB
  - FontpageGen
  - Excel
  - WorkSheet
  - Exchange
  - Setup
  - Fox
  - Fontpage
  - ASP
  - IIS
  - Entourage
  - Money
  - Messanger
  - PocketPC
  - Powerpoint
  - Project
  - Publisher
  - Excel
  - VB
  - Security
  - Portal
  - Services
  - SQLServerDev
  - SVCS
  - SQLServer
  - VB
  - VC
  - MFC
  - ExcelGen

- Previous
  - 1
    - Path Names using vfp 8 getenv("TEMP") returns a path in dos format. ie. C:\DOCUME~1\DAVEBA~1.MAI\LOCALS~1\Temp how can I convert this path to a true windows path TIA Dave Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234183
  - 2
    - Using Blat with variables If you're using Blat and you store the sent to email address to a variable from a field value in a table and the from address to a variable, how do you call blat to run within a form. I know you can't use the Run command, correct? example: memailto = xtable.emailaddr memailfr = "uuuuuu@zzzz.com" *** default sender address The subject and attachment part are not a problem Rusty G Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234173
  - 3
    - VFP9 SP2 + FoxPro Team Given that the FoxPro team has been disbanded, can anyone tell me exactly who is working on VFP9 SP2? TIA -Roger Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234165
  - 4
    - Converting WMI Script to VFP? Hi, I'm playing around with Windows scripting with an eye towards making my own computer inventory application. I have a little test script and it works fine when run as a VBS file but when I run it from VFP I get an error. Jus wondering if anyone can direct me to a source for figuring out the equivelent VFP commands for some of these VBS commands. Or, direct me to a source of examples of these kinds of system calls with VFP? Here is my program: #DEFINE WbemAuthenticationLevelPktPrivacy 6 strUser = "administrator" strPassword = "******" strComputer = "chart433" strNamespace = "" objWbemLocator = CreateObject("WbemScripting.SWbemLocator") objWMIService = objwbemLocator.ConnectServer(strComputer, strNamespace, strUser, strPassword) objWMIService.Security_.authenticationLevel = WbemAuthenticationLevelPktPrivacy *objWMIService = GetObject("winmgmts:" + "{impersonationLevel=impersonate}!\\" + strComputer + "\root\cimv2") colSettings = objWMIService.ExecQuery ("SELECT * FROM Win32_OperatingSystem") For Each objOperatingSystem in colSettings MESSAGEBOX("OS Name: " + objOperatingSystem.Name + chr(13) + ; "Version: " + objOperatingSystem.Version + chr(13) + ; "Service Pack: " + ALLTRIM(STR(objOperatingSystem.ServicePackMajorVersion)) ; + "." + ALLTRIM(STR(objOperatingSystem.ServicePackMinorVersion)) + chr(13) + ; "OS Manufacturer: " + objOperatingSystem.Manufacturer ) NEXT colSettings = objWMIService.ExecQuery ("SELECT * FROM Win32_ComputerSystem") For Each objComputer in colSettings MESSAGEBOX("System Name: " + objComputer.Name + CHR(13) + ; "System Manufacturer: " + objComputer.Manufacturer + CHR(13) + ; "System Model: " + objComputer.Model + CHR(13) + ; "Time Zone: " + ALLTRIM(STR(objComputer.CurrentTimeZone)) + CHR(13) + ; "Total Physical Memory: " + objComputer.TotalPhysicalMemory ) Next MESSAGEBOX("Done!") Of course I put in the real password. The error I get is an OLE IDispatch exception code 0 from SWbemlocator: Access is denied..." message. I am running this from a Windows VPC system if that matters. Like I said, it works as a VBS script from this same VPC system. Any suggestions? Thanks in advance, Linn Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234160
  - 5
    - FoxPro and UAC and Vista I need to run a function that requires my application to have heightened privelages. I do not need to run this every time the application runs though and I only need it temporarily. Is there a way that I can temporarily ask for heightened privelage while the program is already running? Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234149
  - 6
    - The Mabry mail control It sometimes failed to send a PDF as attachment correctly (the file is trimmed by a few bytes). -- iTech Consulting Services Limited Expert in ePOS (Point-Of-Sales) solutions Website: http://www.itech.com.hk (IE only) Tel: (852)2325 3883 Fax: (852)2325 8288 Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234143
  - 7
    - combobox problem Hi all, I have a look up table and a master table. The field that link both is numeric. I also have a combobox bound to both files, but for some reason it doesn't display the field values. my code looks like this comb1.sourcecode= daily_log.jobn comb1.rowsourcetype= 3 comb1.rowsource= "select jobname, jobn from jobs into cursor cc1" comb1.boundColumn= 2 When I navigate the Daily_log the combobox doesn't display anything. What am I missing?? I have other combobox bound to other tables with a key (type char) and there is no problem at all. Another problem is when I define many columns in a combobox it display only the first one. I checked columncount and columnwidth properties and they are ok. comb2.columncount =3 comb2.columnwidth= 200,200,200 TIA Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234126
  - 8
    - How to select multiple items from a Listbox without pressing CTRL key? >Hi, > >I have a listbox with the Multiselect option enabled. I want the user to >be >able to select multiple items without pressing the CTRL key. When a user >clicks on an item, it should toggle from an unselected state to selected >state and vica versa. Is there any way to do that? I tried putting this >code in the click event of the Listbox without much success. > >if this.ListIndex>0 > this.Selected(this.ListIndex) = !this.Selected(this.ListIndex) >endif > >But all this code does is to position the cursor in the listbox to the >lastitem without doing any multiple selections. I am using VFP 9.0 BTW. i also tried: if this.ListIndex>0 this.Selected(this.ListIndex) = !this.Selected(this.ListIndex) NODEFAULT endif but what happens is that as soon as I click on an item, it flashes selected then deselected. Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234113
  - 9
    - Any VFP function to properly format a sentence? Hi, Is there any VFP function or a subroutine that will properly format a sentence ie. Only capitalizing the first words in a sentence. The PROPER() function seems to capitalize all the words in a sentence. Thanks Zoom Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234107
  - 10
    - Use VFP 8.0 to send email via Lotus Notes Good day everybody, I have read in a response by Cindy Winegarden that we can use VFP to send email via Lotus Notes. This is what I need to do in my project. Unfortunately Rusty is using Outlook, so Cindy didn't provide the method on how to do in Lotus Notes. Can Cindy or anyone provide me the way on how to do it? I have some information already build in my application database, and need to pass some of them(as text) via email to selected person. Another question is, at the created Lotus Notes email, is it possible to embedded a link to launch the VFP application? As the person receive the email, will have to run my application to do something. The application will be located in a server and all the users have access to the server. Hope to hear from you and Have a nice day. Best regards, Julie Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234103
  - 11
    - Squirting on the camera Young Annette is doing that. Watch online for free! [url]http://girls-with-toys.info/gallery.php?id=218571[/url] -- Skillet ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Posted via http://www.codecomments.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234099
  - 12
    - error 15 - is not a table (vfp6) Hi I have a database related table that a client would like recovered Trying to open it, the message is 'not a table' Trying to run validate recover I get a message to the effect that is is not a table do I want to remove it I am not give the option to just remove the link to the db and free the table. I suspect it is just the header of the dbf that is damaged . Is there nay hope for it at all? Cheers John Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234098
  - 13
    - Listbox bug? VFP 8, 9 in XP Pro Given a standard listbox with about 10 items shown and set to multiselect, should a click and drag within the listbox select the range of items overwhich the drag took place? It appears that this is the desired behavior, however, one or more items in the list always end up not selected after performing such a selection. It's almost as if an event or interrupt takes place during the drag and VFP does not register the items as selected when that interrupt was happening. Clicking the first desired item, then shift-clicking the last one works fine, but dragging a range of items is spotty. Is this a known bug? -- TRW _______________________________________ t i m . w i t o r t _______________________________________ Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234097
  - 14
    - Where are Forms/Programs Called From? I often re-use code from one project to another, and when compiling the new program, it wants to find forms or programs from the original project. As an example, my new project doesn't use clientedit.scx, but when I compile the new program, it brings it in. How do I find where in the project specific forms and/or programs are being asked for? Once found, I can kill them. I seem to remember older versions of FoxPro (3.0?) or such having this search-type function. Thanks. Jim Fuchs Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234092
  - 15
    - Report "Page x of y" Any easy way to get a report "Page x of y" value for "y" Old question and help plus internet searches still indicate that this is not an easy option. In the past, I have done this by outputting the entire report to a null port, collecting the highest _pageno value then using it to then immediately output the same to the printer. Any pointers? Thanks in advance, Beverly Howard Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234089
  - 16
    - sys(3054) and set filter Hi all, Can i test the rushmore optimisation in the clause SET FILTER TO &MyCondition. In myCondition , i have myCondition =" pros_user=' "+ MyVar + " ' " Cause i test sys(3054,1,"cMemVar") or sys(3054,2,"cMemVar") The Memvar is empty . Have an idea , if it's possible. ? Thank's Olivier Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234075
  - 17
    - VFP 9: strtran() Optional Parms Suppose I have a string where I want to change all "abc" to "def". This is easy: thing="abcdefghiabcjkl" thing=strtran(thing,"abc","def") What if I want to have it be case-insensitive in the search so that thing="aBcdefghiABcjkl" would also result in two changes? The problem is that the flags parm controls case sensitivity, and I apparently have to specify all parms. thing=strtran(thing,"abc","def",,,1) does not work. I have to fill in the blanks as in thing=strtran(thing,"abc","def",1,n,1) where n is arbitrarily high. This is a kludge -- think large memos. Is there a way to avoid this? Sincerely, Gene Wirchenko Computerese Irregular Verb Conjugation: I have preferences. You have biases. He/She has prejudices. Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234071
  - 18
    - Mailknife Your swiss army knife for email: MailKnife http://www.mailknife.com -- --------------------------------- --- -- - Posted with NewsLeecher v3.7 Final Web @ http://www.newsleecher.com/?usenet ------------------- ----- ---- -- - Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234064
  - 19
    - MI5 Persecution: Stasi 21/4/96 (16127) Subject: Chief Constable Alderson Condemns "Stasi" MI5 Newsgroups:uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,soc.culture.british Organization: Toronto Free-Net Summary: Keywords: John Alderson, former Chief Constable of Devon and Cornwall, had the following to say about the expansion of the Security Service's powers, in a recent magazine article; "It is fatal to let the secret service into the area of ordinary crime. MI5 is not under the same restraints as the police. They infiltrate organisations, people's jobs and lives. They operate almost like a cancer." "At the moment the acorn of a Stasi [the former East German communists' secret service] has been planted. It is there for future governments to build on." The message is clear. Criminal subversion and criminal harassment by an unpoliced minority not subject to the law, "infiltration of people's jobs and lives" is with us today. 16127 Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234053
  - 20
    - MI5 Persecution: Leant On 7/4/96 (14613) From: Green <Green@guidion.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't the British Police Doing Their Job? Reply-To: Green@guidion.demon.co.uk Date: Sun Apr 7 21:13:30 1996 In article <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net "Mike Corley" writes: > Last Easter (1995) I went into the local police station in London and spoke to > an officer about the harassment against me. But I couldn't provide tangible > evidence; what people said, in many cases years ago, is beyond proof, and > without something to support my statements I cannot expect a police officer to > take the complaint seriously. This in itself dos not suggest that the police have it in for you. The old bill operates on extremely tight spending limits forced on them by that pillock Michael Howard, and without evidence, they often have higher priorities than chasing something that cannot go to court. I doubt that the police are actually being leant on, but they probably realise that if they looked into this, they would be leant on hard. The met always stays away from anything that looks like it has Defence, Security or secret service interest already, because they realise that they are below these government agencies in the general pecking order. This attitude was made clear in a TV show where a left wing comedian heckled some aristocratic Tory candidate in a local election. The police officer gave the comic a ticking off, even though you could see that this young copper sympathised with the comedian, and regarded the Tory as an upper-crust wanker. He said, and I quote "I'm giving you the ticking off and not him because he's a Lord and I'm a Police Constable." If I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping on me, they would show me the door without even looking at my evidence, because that bored desk seargant with only five years to go before he retires doesn't want to start fucking about with somebody who has incurred the wrath of Stella Rimington. He would rather deal with the lost dogs and driving licence producers, eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and piss off home at the end of his shift than have some high ranking spook having a go at his boss and getting him a bollocking. In short, you have earned much sympathy but little surprise. Just remember that saying about the enemy of your enemies. Have a nice day. ******************************************* QUOTE OF THE DAY****************** * You have just read the opinons of : * "Common sense is merely the set * * * of prejudices a person acquires* ========================================================================= Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: Why Aren't the British Police Doing Their Job? Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british References: <DpIE0r.736.0.bloor@torfree.net> Organization: Toronto Free-Net Distribution: >This in itself dos not suggest that the police have it in for you. >The old bill operates on extremely tight spending limits forced on >them by that pillock Michael Howard, and without evidence, they >often have higher priorities than chasing something that cannot go >to court. I think the police know well what's going on. It is up to them to do something about it. They know I've made a complaint at a police station. I could probably do more to try to help myself (I think someone suggested making a written complaint to the chief constable) but even then I nthink they would not take action. > >I doubt that the police are actually being leant on, but they probably >realise that if they looked into this, they would be leant on hard. >The met always stays away from anything that looks like it has Defence, >Security or secret service interest already, because they realise that >they are below these government agencies in the general pecking order. > So we have a situation where the security service breaks the law, everyone knows MI5 breaks the law, and the police won't investigate crimes that would otherwise earn a jail sentence. Oh good, I'm really glad the UK is a democracy. (<sarcasm>, for those of you who didn't catch that) >If I walked into my local nick and complained that MI5 were snooping on me, >they would show me the door without even looking at my evidence, because >that bored desk seargant with only five years to go before he retires >doesn't want to start fucking about with somebody who has incurred the >wrath of Stella Rimington. He would rather deal with the lost dogs and >driving licence producers, eat his cheese and pickle sandwiches and piss >off home at the end of his shift than have some high ranking spook having >a go at his boss and getting him a bollocking. In this case I think it is 'high-ranking' police officers who are aware of the persecution, they know a complaint has been made, and they're doing nothing. What is more, I don't think there is anything I can do that would make them take action, both because they may be being 'leant on' and through the wider view that it could be deleterious to the state to have a persecution by state organs exposed. They're wrong in taking that point of view, because sooner or later this will all out anyway, and they it will be n years of police inaction (n>=6) that will be questioned. > >In short, you have earned much sympathy but little surprise. Just remember >that saying about the enemy of your enemies. > >Have a nice day. 14613 Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234052
  - 21
    - MI5 Persecution: Shoot to Kill 4/4/96 (13099) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british From: jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: How and Why Did it Start? Reply-To: jbaker@pobox.com Date: Thu Apr 4 05:03:01 1996 jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) wrote: >bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wrote: >>Why would >>the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and more than fiv >>years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because ... >So why didn't they just shoot you dead? >It would have been a lot cheaper. Please make the effort to respond to this point Mike. It was a serious question. Jill (my opinions are entirely my own, no-one else's) ================================================================= Subject: Re: MI5 Persecution: How and Why Did it Start? Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.british References: <Dp5IAr.1EB.0.bloor@torfree.net> Organization: Toronto Free-Net Distribution: jbaker@pobox.com (Jill Baker) wrote: >bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wrote: >>Why would >>the security services expend hundreds of thousands of pounds and more than fiv >>years of manpower to try to kill a British citizen? Because ... >So why didn't they just shoot you dead? >It would have been a lot cheaper. I think there are two reasons nobody has taken physical action as opposed to verbal; a) A lot of people "know". Perhaps you the reader might not know, but lots of people in the media etc do. Remember, I was born in the UK and lived there until a couple of years ago. I don't think these people would condone state-sponsored murder of someone who might be seen on a good day as one of their own. b) Rather than doind anything directly, they're going for spying, verbal harassment, media harassment, every form of persecution short of the physical. Because as soon as anything turns physical, the police become involved; and unless it turns physical, the police can shrug and say 'not our problem'. So they persecute you and try to get you to react, either by hitting one of them (in which case I clearly find myself in the wrong as far as the police are concerned), or by trying to harm myself (in which case they can pretend they weren't responsible). It's a pretty unproductive form of harassment actually, because if you don't react then they're wasting they're time. Or perhaps they're just cheap bullies and trying to wreck someone's life, without any ulterior motive? 13099 Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234050
  - 22
    - MI5 Persecution: Email Cruelty 11/3/96 (11585) From: D.S.Toube@qmw.ac.uk (David Toube) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.legal,uk.media,soc.culture.british Subject: Re: Why Censorship Must Not Be Allowed on Uk.* Reply-To: D.S.Toube@qmw.ac.uk Date: Mon Mar 11 11:47:13 1996 A OSHINEYE <TA5330@QMWCC7.qmw.ac.uk> wrote: :D.S.Toube@qmw.ac.uk (David Toube) wrote: :>I would also be very pleased if Mike Corley would not mailbomb me :>via my university account with messages entitled 'This Is What :>You Get For Censorship', thus closing down the entire college :>email system. :> :>Although it does not personally inconvenience me, it is rather :>dull for the college. :When did this happen? BTW you can always use Pegasus Mail to send all :email from Corley's address back to him and see how he likes it. :--Ade : This weekend. The result, Mike Corley will be gratified to hear, was that all users of the college system were prevented from using email. I suspect that there is no stopping Mike Corley. If mail is automatically returned to him, he will return it back to you tenfold. If he is thrown off his account, as he surely will be, he will find another one. I do not care whether Mike Corley has an email account or not. It is a matter of supreme indifference to me whether his fanciful account of persecution is aired or not. If he thinks that he has been persecuted by M15 and Chris Tarrant, then that is a matter for him. But there is a world of difference between repeatedly spamming usenet - which is unacceptable - and setting up a Web Site containing his post, which is entirely acceptable. Then it will be possible to choose whether or not to partake of his fantasy. However although I would not like to see the censorship of posts because they demonstrate evidence of mental illness, I suspect that Mike Corley will inevitably be censored by his ISP following a number of complaints of usenet abuse and mailbombing. ---- David Toube Lecturer in Law QMW, University of London WWW: http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~ugtl027/index.html David Boothroyd's British Elections Home Page WWW: http://www.qmw.ac.uk/~laws/election/home.html 11585 Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234049
  - 23
    - MI5 Persecution: Jeff Rooker MP 5/3/96 (10071) From: rael@midnight.org (Rael A. Fenchurch) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. Date: Tue Mar 5 04:37:52 1996 Mike, >"go away" replies, and one from a Labour MP saying he was aware of my situation >but wouldn't help me because he regarded me as the "bad guy". Gee thanks, they >do this and then offload the shame they should feel onto you by telling you "oh >but it's your fault". It's a mad world. Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment, you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the main reasons we all think you've truly gone fishing. So? Rael... ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- --- Rael A. Fenchurch (rael@midnight.org, http://www.midnight.org/rael/) --- --- "I don't think compassion's the language of our time" --- --- "Doubt or Die" --- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- ========================================================================== From: Andy Howard <andy@kiss100.demon.co.uk> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. Reply-To: andy@kiss100.demon.co.uk Date: Tue Mar 5 06:06:15 1996 In article: <DnrMsq.239.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wr I got a few > "go away" replies, and one from a Labour MP saying he was aware of my situatio > but wouldn't help me because he regarded me as the "bad guy". Which Labour MP Mike? > -- --------------------------------------------------------------------------- | Andy Howard EMail andy@kiss100.demon.co.uk | | My opinions, not my employer's (Jolly nice people though they are). | | If my employers shared my opinions... Well, frankly I'd be amazed | --------------------------------------------------------------------------- ==================================================================== Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.br$ Followup-To: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british,soc.culture.b$ References: <DnFtLs.E37.0.bloor@torfree.net> <4h45nq$87o_002@leeds.ac.uk> <4h6gkb$ivc$ Organization: Toronto Free-Net Distribution: Mike Corley (bu765@torfree.net) wrote: : >Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned : >copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment, : >you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the : >main reasons we all think you've truly gone fishing. So? : The letter was by email, not on paper. (In addition to snail-mailing, I : emailed all the relevant addresses I could find.) I'll see if I can find : it, I keep a record of most of this correspondence so I may still have it. I'm afraid I don't have a copy of the correspondence. In future I will keep useful letters, so with luck there may be a "next time". The MP was Jeff Rooker, Labour MP. Having looked again at the Labour web page I find he doesn't have an address listed, but I have a record of his address as having been jeff.rooker@geo2.poptel.org.uk. I don't know where I got the address from. I'm so disorganised! ==================================================================== Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.politics,uk.media,uk.legal,alt.politics.british From: J.J.Smith@ftel.co.uk (John J Smith) Subject: Re: Persecution in the U.K. X-Nntp-Posting-Host: death-on-the-rock.ftel.co.uk Message-ID: <Dnw49L.D1H@ftel.co.uk> Sender: smid@death-on-the-rock.ftel.co.uk (RFC931) Organization: Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Ltd References: <DnFtLs.E37.0.bloor@torfree.net> <DnrMsq.239.0.bloor@torfree.net> <Dnsrnu.Jr1.0.bloor@torfree.net> <DntKEo.86E.0.bloor@torfree.net> Date: Thu, 7 Mar 1996 09:12:56 GMT Lines: 54 In article <DntKEo.86E.0.bloor@torfree.net>, Mike Corley <bu765@torfree.net> wrote: >Mike Corley (bu765@torfree.net) wrote: >: >Do you happen to have a copy of this MPs letter? After all, a scanned >: >copy of it would lend great weight to your case here. At the moment, >: >you've offered us nothing in the way of evidence, which is one of the >: >main reasons we all think you've truly gone fishing. So? > >: The letter was by email, not on paper. (In addition to snail-mailing, I >: emailed all the relevant addresses I could find.) I'll see if I can find >: it, I keep a record of most of this correspondence so I may still have it. > >I'm afraid I don't have a copy of the correspondence. In future I will keep >useful letters, so with luck there may be a "next time". Don't believe you. Because that might be proof, and we just *cant* have that. >The MP was Jeff Rooker, Labour MP. Having looked again at the Labour web page I >find he doesn't have an address listed, but I have a record of his address as >having been jeff.rooker@geo2.poptel.org.uk. I don't know where I got the >address from. I'm so disorganised! I did Email this MP yesterday. This is what I wrote: Smid>I am sorry to bother you, but there is a person with a known Smid>personality disorder on the internet usenet, claiming that you Smid>as an MP have backed up his claims that he is being persecuted Smid>by MI5. Smid>His name is Mike Corely, and posts from canada (email address Smid>available if you require). Smid> Smid>He claims that you have told him that his claims that the Smid>"television is watching him", are justified, yet cannot find the Smid>email in which he did so.. Smid>I'd be interested in what you have said to him, because we have Smid>had a long term battle to convince him that he really is schizophrenic Smid>and that Chris Tarrent, MI5 and Martin Lewis from News On Ten are Smid>persecuting him... If you do have the original Email, then that'd Smid>be nice... Smid>If you nothing of this subject, it would not suprise me, however. His reply, surpise, suprise was: MP>No idea what you are on about. I am getting really sick of some of MP>the junk on E mail. I just dump it so he may have contacted MP>but as to an answer I 've better things to do. Your move, Mike. Smid 10071 Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234048
  - 24
    - MI5 Persecution: Flight or fight 7/1/96 (8557) From: huge@axalotl.demon.co.uk (Hugh Davies) Newsgroups: uk.misc Subject: Re: persecution rant (re-post) Reply-To: huge@axalotl.demon.co.uk Date: Sun Jan 7 04:43:41 1996 Yo, Mike, Happy New Year! Haven't you killed yourself yet? In article <DKMIs5.158.0.bloor@torfree.net>, bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) wri >For anyone who hasn't yet read this, There is no-one in the known Universe who hasn't read this at least 5 times. >and really really wants to then here No-one wants to read it, Mike. It's drivel. >is the article that was posted last year in this newsgroup.... Over and over and over and over and over and over and over and over again.... -- Regards, Huge. ================================================== Subject: persecution rant (re-post) Newsgroups: uk.misc Organization: Toronto Free-Net Summary: Keywords: >Yo, Mike, Happy New Year! Haven't you killed yourself yet? But I can't, you see then I wouldn't know how things would turn out ("we're only doing this because we don't know how it's all going to end" - logic error in line 100) >There is no-one in the known Universe who hasn't read this at least 5 times. It doesn't seem to have done a whole lot of good since the good old persecution stuff is still going on. Over Christmas I was flying BA and got hassled by a couple of people on the flight (sounds like something you've heard before, doesn't it?). All the usual stuff about the town I'd been staying, "he doesn't know who we are", self-justification that we're doing it because he's a "nutter" etc. Real friendly like. Also a fairly obvious wind-up and attempt to get some reaction. I think they're trying quite hard to get a reaction. If I hit someone on a flight over the Atlantic, am I actually breaking any laws, and if so whose? Is a BA aircraft British territory subject to British laws while it's in mid-flight? It is really tempting to "reply" and that's obviously what they want, so who am I to refuse a blow to the head for people who ask for it so consistently? 8557 Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234047
  - 25
    - MI5 Persecution: Dihydrocodeine 26/11/95 (7043) From: michaelm@easynet.co.uk (michaelm@easynet.co.uk) Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.radio.uk Subject: Re: Britain's Shame (repost) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1995 09:19:13 GMT Organization: ------------ Lines: 89 Message-ID: <817374781.20251@michaelm.easynet.co.uk> References: <DIM34L.755.0.bloor@torfree.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: michaelm.easynet.co.uk X-NNTP-Posting-Host: michaelm.easynet.co.uk X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 1.0.82 bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corblymee) wrote: | In June 1990 a horrifying campaign of harassment was initiated in London by | what are believed to be elements of the security services. The harassment has | continued for over five years, starting from the broadcast and print media, | and encompassing abuse through set-up situations and by people in public | places. It has been brought to the attention of the police and they are aware | what is happening, but are not taking any action to prevent it. <whopping great snip of 884 lines> corley, you puzzle me! i've narrowed your possible motives down to one or more of the following: 1) you work on behalf of the british government with a hidden agenda of furthering the largely right wing (most to hide) censorship brigade's cause, "a drug-crazed psycho posting dangerous nonsense - how very very sad - but in the public interest,we must act." draft internet (censorship) bills rolling off hm govt's banders at this very moment, I don't doubt it! 2) you work for the daily mail which has started to feel the "internet pinch" as it suddenly clicks in the chronically adled minds of yet more and more of their readers - that shudder-inducing realisation that the entire editorial staff at the mail are scaremongering, imbecilic, blood-leeching , totalitarian twats - can any else sense a coordinated campaign on its way ??- "Mail urges (their) government to act - internet safety endangered by uncontrolled surfing lunatics - boys hands blown off by internet maniacs - net porn responsible for 392323rd rape " .net porn responsible for 392324th rape " .net porn responsible for 392325th rape " .net porn responsible for 392326th rape " .net porn responsible for 392327th rape " net porn responsible for 392328th rape " .net porn responsible for 392329th rape " <yawn> .net porn responsible for 392330th rape " .net porn responsible for 392331st rape " .net porn responsible for 392332nd rape " net porn responsible for 392333rd rape " <yawn> .net porn responsible for 392334th rape " .net porn responsible for 392335th rape " .net porn responsible for 392336th rape " .net porn responsible for 392337th rape " net porn responsible for 392338th rape " etcetera, straight from the old nag's mouth.. lee-potter (and english), take particular note.. (how ever you two common ********* managed to avoid encarceration for what was, quite evidently,wilful contempt of court in the regina v taylforth & knights case, is frankly beyond me.. those dreaded and now all too familiar words "endemic corruption" were muttered by at least one Q.C. >3) you (at least) believe there's (some) substance to your claim(s) and you >have a genuine axe to grind. If so, bloody well go for it, but scrape the >heavy layer of steaming dung off the top (that's assuming you're even >capable of distinguishing fantasy from reality.) 4) you (as an email address) are serving as some bizarre "educational" programme orchestrated by the psychiatric industry - ever keen to justify enforced electrical lobotomies, electroshock and dwugs .All poised for the echo? - "corley frigging well needs lobotomising" 5) you're just clinically insane with absolutely no comprehension or insight into the consequences you will possibly face as a result of repeatedly posting what, certainly on the face of it, looks like complete and utter bullshit. 6) you're some weirdo prankster(s) - probably a group of student psychiatrists having a cheap crack whilst high as kites on pilfered dihydrocodeine. 7) You are infact working for the ss yourself, gauging public awareness of the extent and methods of bugging - infinity transmitters, microwave surveillance devices, satellite tracking equipment, 'chipping' of black crims, say no more. 8) You're fuelling the central usenet administration committee, who, it is believed, are keen to see the introduction of a wide-reaching framework of self-created powers relating to posting cancellation. (see the 'son of RFC1036') my bet's on (5) - but just fuck off corley- irritate the lard-arsed canucks instead. The cia's financing of "professor" cameron's brain-washing experiments in montreal.. would be a good starting point ... or perhaps "professor" watts and his widely admired masterful double eye-jabbing trick - a couple of wallops with an icepick. such a waste of perfectly edible four year old hispanics !!!!.. Perhaps the old marylebone rd posse could fill us in with a few more facts on this one...?? You are all on the .net now ????? A very warm welcome :-) ... christmas rapidly approaching.. >business booming?? Do we all get a look in at flotation ??!! ====================================================== From: Gulliver <kst2co@herts.ac.uk> Newsgroups: uk.misc,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.radio.uk Subject: Re: Britain's Shame (repost) Date: Sun, 26 Nov 1995 18:25:32 +0000 Organization: University of Hertfordshire Lines: 12 Message-ID: <Pine.SUN.3.91.951126182156.16879B-100000@altair.herts.ac.uk> References: <DIM34L.755.0.bloor@torfree.net> <817343873snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk> NNTP-Posting-Host: altair.herts.ac.uk Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII In-Reply-To: <817343873snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk> Actually, upon thinking about Mike's story it reminds me of someone I heard about who suffered from a persecution copmlex. He was an immigrant from some Eastern Bloc country who believed that 30 years after he emigrated the KGB were still after him. He would blame them if he had difficulty unlocking his car for instance (he reckoned they were putting something into the locks!). Something is very wrong, probably in Mike's head but what the hell, loonies make life more fun! -- Angus Gulliver ======================================================= Subject: Castrate the depraved MI5 buggers now Newsgroups: uk.misc Organization: Toronto Free-Net >Something is very wrong, probably in Mike's head but what the hell, >loonies make life more fun! Something is very wrong when the security services abandon their usual target of politicians and the well-known, to pursue the hitherto unknown nonentities such as myself. >corley, you puzzle me! Why? Because of my pathological truthfulness? >3) you (at least) believe there's (some) substance to your claim(s) and you >have a genuine axe to grind. If so, bloody well go for it, but scrape the >heavy layer of steaming dung off the top (that's assuming you're even >capable of distinguishing fantasy from reality.) Bloody well go for it I will. I think the "standard spiel" is quite studded with facts actually. There's plenty of "meat" there if the appropriate people can be motivated to get their act together and pursue the case. >my bet's on (5) - but just fuck off corley- irritate the lard-arsed canucks >instead. The cia's financing of "professor" cameron's brain-washing the lard-arsed canucks (?) are irritating me, but you don't want to hear about that >business booming?? Do we all get a look in at flotation ??!! 7043 Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234046
- Next
  - 1
    - MI5 Persecution: A new Kafka? 3/10/95 (5529) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.media,uk.politics From: jackson@soldev.tti.com (Dick Jackson) Subject: Re: What it's like to be watched by the security services Message-ID: <1995Oct13.225312.6514@ttinews.tti.com> Sender: usenet@ttinews.tti.com (Usenet Admin) Nntp-Posting-Host: soldev Organization: Citicorp-TTI at Santa Monica (CA) by the Sea References: <DFy9tB.3JK.0.bloor@torfree.net> <813188298snz129.os2.7@blackcat.demon.co.uk> <DGE7uJ.8tF.0.bloor@torfree.net> Date: Fri, 13 Oct 1995 22:53:12 GMT Lines: 34 In article <DGE7uJ.8tF.0.bloor@torfree.net> bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) writes: > >Strangers in the street have recognized me on sight many times, and shown >awareness of the current thread of abuse. To give you one example, in 1992 >I was seriously ill, and a manager at work somewhat humouroursly said that >"it wasn't fair" that people were bullying me. A few days later, I >attended for the first time a clinic in London as an outpatient, and on my >way out was accosted by someone who asked if "they had paid my fare", with >emphasis on the word "fare". He repeated the word several times in this >different context; that they should have paid my "fare", each time >emphasising the word. > >For two and a half years from the time their harassment started until >November 1992 I refused to see a psychiatrist, because I reasoned that I >was not ill of my own action or fault, but through the stress caused by >harassment, and that a lessening of the illness would have to be >consequent to a removal of its immediate cause, in other words a cessation >of harassment. I also reasoned that since they were taunting me with jokes >about mental illness, if I were to seek treatment then the abusers would >think that they had "won" and been proved "right". <I've deleted a lot, but I think this gives the idea> I have so far not contributed to this tread, it has been unpleasant in my opinion. However, I was struck by the resemblance of the above passages to the writing of Franz Kafka. Viz. while from an objective viewpoint it seems to refer to a abnormal world, in a strange way it does resonate strongly at other levels. Mr. Corley, have you tried to write for publication? I honestly think it might lead somewhere positive. Dick Jackson (serious for a change and expecting to get beaten up) 5529 Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234044
  - 2
    - MI5 Persecution: Do they fear truth? 3/10/95 (4015) From: flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Krüger) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.politics,alt.politics.british Subject: Re: What it's like to be watched by the security services Date: 3 Oct 1995 15:38:20 GMT Organization: Steinkrug Publications Lines: 66 Message-ID: <44rldc$nrm@news.cityscape.co.uk> References: <DFus24.HxB.0.bloor@torfree.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: aa040.du.pipex.com X-Newsreader: WinVN 0.92.6+ In article <DFus24.HxB.0.bloor@torfree.net>, bu765@torfree.net (Mike Corley) says: > >It completely mystifies me how it can be done. One night in June 1992 I >was in a bed-and-breakfast in Oxford (some hard facts now, you?ll be >bored of the generalisations). I booked the B&B from the office phone. >So if they had the office bugged, or the phone system bugged, they could >have heard the call. If it was as late as 1992 then there was already a system available to feed digital video out of a domestic TV via the mains. Each raster of video was preceded by a sixteen bit address which identified the television set. All that was needed was a decoder box plugged into the mains somewhere between your room and the grid transformer. The signal was decoded and then fed down to the phone line. They probably even had a PC which enabled them to see the picture as well. By 1992 the technology had moved on from slowscan to near real time video with the advent of devices from Brooktree and Harris etc. >the newsreader reacted. Breathed deeply, as if in psychological relief. Maybe, or perhaps as if in:- sci.psychology.announce sci.psychology.consciousness sci.psychology.journals.psyche sci.psychology.journals.psycoloquy sci.psychology.misc sci.psychology.personality sci.psychology.psychotherapy sci.psychology.research sci.psychology.theory >I can't describe to you what goes through your mind when you know >someone on TV is "seeing" you the viewer. You?re doing OK so far. >Your instinct is to switch the TV off, to change channel, Not much point unless you switch off the TV at the mains >like an ostrich, Looks like Ostrich farming is going to catch on in the UK as you may have seen in some of the other uk newsgroups >The one time I did directly ask someone in the company who knew what was >going on, first he spewed wool about, "well we have to think what is >reality and what is proof anyway", then went into barefaced denial liar >mode. It opens your eyes, if they can't say out loud what they keep >saying in a disguised fashion, they must fear exposure, they must fear >the truth. wool_ barefaced_ denial_ liar_ eyes_ fashion_ fear_ exposure, How is your mother these days Mike? And BTW - How is the thesis coming along? Peter Kruger ------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.gold.net/flames/ flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk 4015 Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234041
  - 3
    - MI5 Persecution: Grievous Bodily Harm 2/10/95 (2501) From: jeibisch@revolver.demon.co.uk (James Eibisch) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.politics,uk.media,rec.arts.tv.uk.misc Subject: Re: Auntie gets it in the emails Reply-To: jeibisch@revolver.demon.co.uk Date: Mon Oct 2 19:44:19 1995 lig0007@queens-belfast.ac.uk (TOM OATES) wrote: >However, I'm pleased to say that, in the past couple of days, Mike Corley has >stopped doing it and he appears (I say this cautiously) to be acting more >reasonably. True, his postings are still based on paranoid delusions. >However, so long as he doesn't go back to his old practices of multiple, >identical, unreadable postings, I'm sure that most people on this newsgroup >are willing to put up with him. Time to come out of the woodwork of this thread (or variations thereof)... I find it annoying that discussion of Mike's situation is spread over multiple threads - it makes it hard to follow, and especially to follow up. If it could be consolidated into one thread on relevant newsgroups (I'm reading this on uk.media btw). I'm a little surprised with the volume of abuse Mike has received, but believe strongly in freedom of speech if such a thing were to exist, which clearly includes abuse as much as anything. One thing which has been missing from this discussion is this simple prognosis: that maybe Mike is right and that, despite his admitted mental condition, there really is a campaign against him organised by now-influential ex-students of his university. Does anyone remember the TV series GBH, a fictional account of security service and governmental power games? Fictional, certainly, but one of the most powerful pieces of TV drama I've seen in many years, fascinating and quite believable, even. The fact is, as Mike has pointed out (oh, so many times :-), that the security services _do_ have the influence, contacts, resources, and time to conduct such a campaign of surveillance and even psychological terror if they so chose. If they have this power, then they will surely use it We still don't have all the facts from Mike, and the most pertinent here I think would be about his time at university - the people who took against him, the ringleaders. We need to know far more about Mike: his political and social affiliations, put in context with his univeristy years, the enemies he made, the reasons people ganged up on him at the very early stages. I don't subscribe to conspiracy theories generally, but I know there is far more that goes on in the universities, old boy's clubs, civil and secret services and Parliament than is ever made public. Mike, I leave it to you to construct a _single_ thread in a relevant newsgroup about this topic and keep to this thread to give us new information and answer questions about your situation. Ignore the 'Mike Corley is a nutter' posts unless they are relevant. Give us more detail. Who knows? It may be true, stranger things have happened. _ James Eibisch ('v') N : E : T : A : D : E : L : I : C : A Reading, U.K. (,_,) http://metro.turnpike.net/J/jeibisch/ ======= ------------------------------- Tue, 03 Oct 1995 04:01:34 uk.misc Thread 3 of 14 Lines 58 Re: Auntie gets it in the emails Respno 16 of 16 J.J.Smith@ftel.co.uk John J Smith at Fujitsu Telecommunications Europe Ltd In article <812677261.12841@revolver.demon.co.uk>, James Eibisch <jeibisch@revolver.demon.co.uk> wrote: >lig0007@queens-belfast.ac.uk (TOM OATES) wrote: >One thing which has been missing from this discussion is this simple >prognosis: that maybe Mike is right and that, despite his admitted >mental condition, there really is a campaign against him organised by >now-influential ex-students of his university. We're trying to find this out on uk.misc. He's posted some *new* *huge* replies (which I'd have to give up my day job to reply to), detailing some things like: a) Mike Corley is *not* his real name b) Exactly what the "abuse" is (it seems be such things, as taking completely unrelated newspaper articles, striving to make them a disgusting insult, then redirecting against himself). c) How he came to the conclusion. I think he's doing rather better nowadays.. >Does anyone remember the TV series GBH, a fictional account of security >service and governmental power games? Fictional, certainly, but one of >the most powerful pieces of TV drama I've seen in many years, >fascinating and quite believable, even. This would be a point, apart from the fact that this was directed against someone of political importance. I don't believe Mike is... >The fact is, as Mike has pointed out (oh, so many times :-), that the >security services _do_ have the influence, contacts, resources, and time >to conduct such a campaign of surveillance and even psychological terror >if they so chose. If they have this power, then they will surely use it >at some point against some people. It appears he has formed the Security Service conclusion, because they are the only ones capable of doing it. A "searching for an enemy capable of it". >We still don't have all the facts from Mike, and the most pertinent here >I think would be about his time at university - the people who took >against him, the ringleaders. We need to know far more about Mike: his >political and social affiliations, put in context with his univeristy >years, the enemies he made, the reasons people ganged up on him at the >very early stages. I'm beginning to think that we never will get all the facts from Mike. We may, however, get enough... >Mike, I leave it to you to construct a _single_ thread in a relevant >newsgroup about this topic and keep to this thread to give us new >information and answer questions about your situation. Ignore the 'Mike >Corley is a nutter' posts unless they are relevant. Uk.misc, me boy... Smid ========================================================== From: flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Kr|ger) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,uk.media,uk.politics,alt.politics.british,alt.conspiracy Subject: Re: What it's like to be watched by the security services Date: Tue Oct 3 15:41:54 1995 In article <44rrrh$t6v@news.ox.ac.uk>, idaniel@jesus.ox.ac.uk (Illtud Daniel) says: > >And what do you mean when you state that the symptoms are too >'textbook'? Are the textbooks wrong? I think what is meant by 'textbook' is that some of the symptoms of 'illness' displayed in the posts seem to have been lifted from textbooks describing mental instability and personality disorders. I must admit I haven't seen Mike's postings before has he only just started posting again? Peter Kruger ------------------------------------------------------------ http://www.gold.net/flames/ flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk 2501 Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234040
  - 4
    - MI5 Persecution: Goldfish and Piranha 29/9/95 (987) I just thought I'd let you know what I've been reading into the "Crusader" spam. I don't want to post this to usenet because somebody might try to tie that in to my posts in some way (someone already has, in uk.misc). First of all, I'd like to ask you to believe that my phone line in my apartment is bugged, and has been for many months. I have moved a couple of times this year, but "they" have faithfully been on my trail. Anyway, let's suppose my phone line is bugged. Now, when I talk to my internet service provider, it's over a SLIP (now PPP) connection. So if you wanted to bug what was said, either you'd listen in over the line and have to decode the transmission, or you could go to the service provider (more difficult) and ask them to decode a particular user's connection. OK, so now they're listening to everything I do over my SLIP/PPP connection. A couple of months ago I was messing around with faking articles through nntp servers and through anonymous remailers. I chose a nice inconspicuous newsgroup for my little tests, something no-one would ever notice. Guess which newsgroup I chose??? Yes, _FISH_!!! or rec.aquaria to be precise And guess what articles I tried to post? Goldfish, Koi carp and, you'll never guess... PIRANHA!!! The goldfish article and the Koi went through, but the piranha didn';t appear. by now you probably think this is too silly for words. But if you look in the papers a few eeks ago you will find John Major, Tonny Blair and Paddy Ashdown sharing a "private joke" about Major's sunburnt goldfish. We haven't had anything about Koi yet (they must be too dull ). Now, sent by someone who clearly knew what they were doing (they chose an Italian backbone site for their launch point) we have many thousands of messages to people all over the globe. All about piranha, and with the punchline "that gives you something to think about, doesn't it?" The way it works is that they're trying to kill two birds with one stone again. I don't knoiw why they should be against these national alliance people, but my interpretation is that they simultaneously try to discredit them, and stem the flow of Corley articles. ================================================================= In article <DFnE55.8tF.0.bloor@torfree.net>, Mike Corley <bu765@torfree.net> wrote: > >John J Smith (J.J.Smith@ftel.co.uk) wrote: > >: b) we do know who you are. Or are you someone else we don't know about? >: You are currently known as "That bloody persistant net nutter, who's >: expanding from uk.misc to the rest of the world". > >I think the point I was trying to make is that I could tell you things >from my personal life, at home and at work, which would add credibility >to my story. But if I named people, then (a) they would object violently >to being included in this shenanigans, and (b) I would be revealing my >identity which would be bad for my personal life and my work life. Of >course some people in my personal life, and at work, do know who "mike >corley" is. But at least we're observing a studied silence for now. :People can always be called "MR X", to save them being named. : :I'm completely perplexed as to what you mean by b). Revealing identity? :To who? And why would this be bad for any part of your life when you :already have a less than respectful reputation here? I'll just enumerate one or two things that I can still remember. Sometime around August/Sept 1992 I was living in a house in Oxford, and coming out of the house was physically attacked by someone - not punched, just grabbed by the coat, with some verbals thrown in for good measure. That was something the people at work shouldn't have known about... but soon after a couple of people were talking right in front of me about, "yeah, I heard he was attacked". Again, one I went for a walk in some woods outside Oxford. The next day, at work, someone said "you know he went to the forest yesterday". I don't want to put details on usenet of what happened because to do so would be to risk it happening again. If you put ideas in peoples' heads then you can find them reflecting back at you, and I don't want that. Also I can't remember that much from three years ago. From november 1992 I started taking "major tranquilizers" and just blotted the whole thing from my mind. >This is a feature time and time again, that the security services >(presumed) get at you by manipulating other people around you to get at >you. If you have their contacts, manpower, resources and technology then >you can do that sort of thing. :But why? Are you a threat? They pretend they "have" to get at me. After the first few weeks they had to find a reason to spy and abuse. You can't abuse someone unless they're in the wrong in some way. What I did "wrong" was to be ill. So it became "nutter" and "monster" and "he's going to attack us" coupled with "ha ha ha, he can't do anything to defend himself, it was so funny". That obvious contradiction within their propaganda is something they blithely ignore. :So, the Security Services never *actually* appear, and you assume that :they get someone else to do your dirty work. This is a bit of a big :logical step, here: That person doesn't like me, or is causing me trouble, :it's not because they've got problems themselves, it must be the "Security :Services". Yes. Because people are infallible. Or is there more? A single source is indicated because of the range of harassment. BBC + Capital + manipulated_public_at_large + set_up_situations, what does that add up to? Add in the technology to carry out the covert spying and the manpower and knowhow to follow you around for five years without being spotted. It smells very much of the security services, because there is no other organization (to my knowledge) which does the things I've seen these people do. Remember, they have deliberately chosen the softest of soft targets to victimize. They purposely chose a mentally ill person who they thought would be likely to kill himself anyway, so that they could get away with murder. And in all likelihood it will have started as a personal vendetta by someone. Who could that be? I don't know, but I can give you some clues. The first possibility (deep breath) is that someone from my college set me up. Six years ago I graduated from university in the UK, during the last year there I was steadily getting more and more ill. I know that I was talking in my sleep; although I don't know what I was saying, it got me a reputation, and if someone from my college talked afterwards to the "wrong" people then that could be the reason for all that has followed. I think that's the strongest contender for source. Directly beneath my room lived another bloke who frequently had his friends round late at night, after the time that I went to sleep. So they could have heard what I was saying in my sleep, and that could have got me the reputation for "talking to myself". What I don't know is why that should have rebounded a year after I left. You'd think it would have happened sooner; it's a bit odd to wait for a year and then start abuse. That leads me to question what in particular happened around May/June 1990 for them to start then. >What I don't know is how it looks from the other side, from the side of >the people who are being manipulated to get at me. On a couple of >occasions I have challenged people to tell the truth of the matter, but >they have alwats ducked the challenge. :Have you ever considered the possibility, that you have made a mistake, and :the people don't know what you are talking about? Yes. I am currently considering the possibility that some people around me know only what is being posted on Usenet, and have not been "contacted" by "them". But I _know_ that others have been contacted. :What words? Are they in common use? Could they be a catchphrase of a :popular comedian?: "Nice to see you, to see you nice"? In England the all-time No. 1 is "nutter". Easter this year, returning home from Clapham police station to report five years of harassment ("we're not saying it's happening and we're not saying it isn't happening"), another "not happening" incident of harassment when a cowardly little slut did her country proud by yelling "nutter, nutter, nutter" in the face of the hated enemy. What can you do about that? You can't yell abuse back in their face, because they know they're supported by their peers, by the media, by the murderers in the security forces. You can't put them down when the fascist establishment is on their side. You can't hit them, because they would deny their abuse, they would deny knowing anything, and bring charges against the "nutter" who attacked them "at random". >You know, you're >passing saomeone, they're hardly going to construct an argument for your >benefit, so they work a word of abuse into the conversation which they >can giggle at. :Abuse such as what? We're all adults here, we can take it. Is this abuse :aimed at you? How can you tell it is? I think I've said already what the words are. Thing is, at any given time the language is consistent. In January everyone's calling you X, then a few weeks later people stop calling you X and start calling you Y. You can tell it's aimed at me, because when people repeatedly say the same words are you walk past, then laugh, you would have to be hard of understanding not to recognize it. >Or they repeat something that's been said somewhere else... the PE thing >being a case in point. PE says it, then other people pick up the refrain. :Remind me who PE is again. PE = "Private Eye" >: >To give you an example, which I mentioned in another posting. In around >: >October 1992, Private Eye ran a cover with the heading "Major's support >: >lowest ever", with John calling to Norma on the cover "come back, Norma". >: >Only one obvious interpretation to that, isn';;t there? I certainly >: >thought so when I saw that cover. Wrongo!! Down the pub with people from work >: >Simon says to phil, "don';t you think it's wrong then?" phil says, "well >: >private eye are usuallyright"..."hislop strikes again.. > >: Erm. Mike? Heeeelllllooo? What are you on about. What is the other >: interpretation then? Norma having an affair? Seems a bit wrong, with the >: heading "Majors support Lowest ever"... > >No, this one isn't obvious , it really does need to be explained. I >certainly didn't understand it when I first saw it. You see, the kernel >of vitriol is in the words "come back". At the time, the themes of >abuse were centred around interpretations of those two words (stretch your >mind a little bit, I don't have to spell it out for you, surely). :You did in your mail item. : :You seem to be scouting about something called a "Double Entendre". The :inference being "Come" = Ejaculation, "Back" = Anus (not the first part :of the body I would have went for, I would have foolishly gone for "Back", :silly old me). : :You see to have picked a sodomy double entendre out of a Private Eye :headline. They are everywhere. The English language has much double :meaning in it, and if you put your mind to it, you could pull a double :entendre out of a randomly chosen page of the bible. So what? >The point is that when Simon pointed it out to Phil, he did recognise >what it meant after a moment's thought... and so did I... and so did the >people who repeated it several times later... so however murky it may >seem to you, that is the meaning they intended it to have... I still don't really know if the meaning was intended when that headline was written, or if it was simply "found" after the fact. The reason I think it might be the former is that I got quite a lot of abuse along the lines of "sound-alike" or "double-entendre" at work, in particularly from Steve. So "double" inevitably came to mean split-personality, "two people in one"; "back" inevitably came to mean "backside", "come" inevitably meant you-know- what, "split" (well, we'd better split now) again you can guess, "bent" (of a similar bent), the list goes on forever. These aren't "nice" double- entendres intended for comedy, they're nasty words to humiliate and cause pain. If I could turn the clock back three years then I would sue my former employers for harassment and I would almost certainly win. I had to take pills after a year of Oxford, so they wouldn't be able to lie their way out of it. Actually, I could still take them to court - the main obstacle being that three years after the fact is a bit late and much of what happened, the details that would be necessary for a case to go to court, has just been obliterated by time. : Smid ============================================== From: flames@flames.cityscape.co.uk (Peter Kr|ger) Newsgroups: uk.misc,soc.culture.british,alt.conspiracy,uk.media,uk.legal Subject: Re: Mike Corley - a (helpful) suggestion Date: Mon Oct 2 05:43:42 1995 In article <812551172snz@objmedia.demon.co.uk>, Snail <snail@objmedia.demon.co.uk> says: >Indeed, I feel that my Usenet access is censored simply because I don't want >to download groups he is partaking in, because of his behaviour. > >I wasn't that bothered, but I am starting to get seriously pissed off >with him. Which takes a lot. Hi Snail This person Corley seems quite interesting for three reasons. I put the following at the end of a post in another thread just to see if he was reading any other threads in uk.media. It seems he is probably not. ----------------------------------------------------------------------- Heres an interesting little story from back in the early days of CCD technology. There was this miniature camera which was designed to fit behind the infrared receiver lens of the remote control system (just beside the IR sensor itself) the camera clocked out the data in 256 lines of 256 pixels from a Fairchild chip and fed it out, a line at a time, into the VBI within the TV set itself. The signal could be picked up remotely from a standard license detector van from where it was stripped out of the surrounding RF signal and relayed back to the TV station where it was displayed as a slowscan monochrome image in a corner of the news readers monitor. 987 Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234039
  - 5
    - Array pulldowns for text fields Stuck all day trying to use an array to provide a combobox "pick" for a database text field in a form. Details; Field needs to stay "text" (other apps accessing the database) The object "aCategory" exists in form properties Pulling the sql array "thisform.aCatagory" into a form array object in the form init. Array is correctly populated within the form init ComboBox properties shows; controlSource = master.category rowSource = thisform.aCategory Watch on thisform.aCategory changes to "... could not be evaluated.." on thisform.refresh (i think) which contains no reference to the object (but contains a "dodefault()") Resulting combobox Pulldown contains only two choices, current contents and blank. Locals" shows the array object variable thisform.aCategory present and fully populated Help, I'm obviously missing something obvious here. Thanks in advance, Beverly Howard Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234034
  - 6
    - Placing Images At Runtime Hi. I have the following code inside the right click event of the screen in order to place an image at runtime. However the image is not being displayed. Can anyone tell me what is wrong? It relates to a previous question I had on drawing on the screen. As a test, I am using the fox.bmp public loimage loimage = CREATEOBJECT("image") loimage.Picture = "c:\vfp8\fox.bmp" loimage.top = 100 loimage.left = 100 thisform.refresh TIA MIke Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234030
  - 7
    - FoxPro Views Causing Blocking? I have a FoxPro 9 Application which primarily uses FoxPro views with a SqlServer 2000 back end. During heavy loads (30 concurrent users). I've randomly seen cases where blocking occurs on the database. At times it will bring the application to a halt. Have I reached a scaling point with views and should start looking into converting to SPT? Thanks in Advance Vic Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234019
  - 8
    - calling parents event Hi all, In VFP 8.0 I'm using picformbtns. As you know there are many buttons and there is default code for the click event. I want to add my own code before and after the default event code. for button cmdAdd in the click event something like procedure click mycode ...... call cmdAdd default click event code ..... more code how should I call the default code of the event ???? TIA Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234016
  - 9
    - Could I access a remote DBF via ODBC? The client side is easy. But how could I serve the DBF via something like ODBC service? -- @~@ Might, Courage, Vision, SINCERITY. http://www.linux-sxs.org / v \ Simplicity is Beauty! May the Force and Farce be with you! /( _ )\ (Xubuntu 7.04) Linux 2.6.21.5 ^ ^ 21:42:01 up 4 days 11:14 0 users load average: 0.04 0.05 0.00 news://news.3home.net news://news.hkpcug.org news://news.newsgroup.com.hk Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234012
  - 10
    - Commercial frameworks Do they have just one framework.VCX file or multiple *.VCX files? -- iTech Consulting Services Limited Expert in ePOS (Point-Of-Sales) solutions Website: http://www.itech.com.hk (IE only) Tel: (852)2325 3883 Fax: (852)2325 8288 Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 234002
  - 11
    - something like rich text control, but for html? I'm looking for something similar to the Rich Text control, but which will format and display HTML instead of Rich Text. I don't need any fancy HTML, just text and tables. I don't need editing, either. I only want something whose content is a little easier to edit at design time than RTF. Anyone know of such a beast? Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 233993
  - 12
    - Why won't this custom option group work? In an attempt to make an optiongroup handle a logical controlsource, I made a custom option group class based on the standard optiongroup class. It has the standard two option buttons. The only customization is the addition of the following access and assign methods for the Value property: Value_Access: WAIT window "Accessing: "+TRANSFORM(THIS.Value) TIMEOUT 1 RETURN IIF(THIS.Value = 1, .T., .F.) Value_Assign: wait window "Assigning: "+TRANSFORM(m.vNewVal) TIMEOUT 1 This.Value = IIF(m.vNewVal = .T., 1, 2) The ControlSource of the optiongroup is set to a logical field in a table: theField -------- T F T F T When the form starts up the wait window with "Assigning .T." is displayed about 4 times - apparently during the form's paint and refresh methods. Okay, that's the field value. So far so good. Clicking a button that does a SKIP and a Form.Refresh() displays "Assigning .F.", the optiongroup correctly updates to show the second optionbutton selected, but then "Assigning .T." is shown and the optiongroup switches back to the first button being selected. Not good. As a result, as you skip through the table, theField gets set to .T. as the record pointer hits each record. Any idea where this second assignment to .T. is coming from? This seems very close to working and is a nice simple solution, but this unexpected assignment is messing it up! Turning on Event Tracking seems to indicate that the .T. assignment might be happening when the form's Paint() method is envoked during the form refresh. Yes, I know that a checkbox can easily be used in this case, but the interface calls for an optiongroup. I could change the underlying table to a text field with "Y" and "N" values, but leaving the field logical would be prefered for ease of data processing. -- TRW _______________________________________ t i m . w i t o r t _______________________________________ Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 233986
  - 13
    - Test Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 233985
  - 14
    - Possible to "draw" on screen using mouse? Hi. Does anyone know if it is possible to let the user "draw" or "circle" items on a screen. We will be displaying images on screen and a client was wondering if they would be able to draw or circle various items? Strange request but just wondering if anyone has some thoughts. TIA. Mike Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 233984
  - 15
    - user rights issue Nearly all our programs have a necesity to write to the folder where the executable is installed, ie local tables which are synchronised with the server tables. All our programs get installed into the program files folder. We have come accross machines occasionaly where the logged on user has only 'user' rights and cannot write to the installation folder. My question is, are we using the wrong folder to store our local data and configuration files or is there another way round this problem. Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 233976
  - 16
    - Download file using IE How do i download a file from a website using IE command or Automation ? thanks! Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 233972
  - 17
    - winsock control tries to load vfp 9 installer...please help Hello and thanks in advance for the help. I have a project that uses the mswinsock control. A new and frustrating behavior has started occurring. After loading VFP when I go to modify the form with the winsock control on it, it begins trying to load the vfp 9 installer. I can cancel out of it and then the app will work fine (if you don't count the bugs I have yet to fix). Why is the winsock control being present making the ide try to load the vfp 9 installer? I have both VFP 7 and 9 on this machine. The project is being developed in 7 but I have made a test form and tried to load it in 9 and the problem happens there as well. Does anyone know what is going on? Thanks, Jeff Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 233963
  - 18
    - OLE error I have a program - VFP9 Sp1 - which creates an Excel file. In the program, when the sheet is ready I create subtotals using the following code: oSelected.Subtotal(1, -4157, @laArray, .f., .F., 1). If I run this program 1-2 times per day I do not have any problem. But after 4-5 runs I have the following error: OLE error code 0x80010105: The server threw an exception. Could anyone help me what can be the mistake? Many thanks. -- Sandor Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 233950
  - 19
    - How to convert arrow keys to tab/shift-tab in a grid I have a grid, and would like to set it so that the arrow keys cause the focus to move to the next/previous object in the tab order. In the keypress method, I watch for chr(4), and keyboard a chr(9). This works in the forward direction. However, I also watch for a chr(19), and keyboard a '{SHIFT+TAB}', but nothing happens. I can press shift-tab, and it works as expected, but programatically doing it seems to be ignored. I can't keyboard a chr(15), because this is also ctrl-o and causes the open dialog to appear. Up/down arrows works as expected. So - how can I trap a left arrow, and keyboard a shift-tab so that the focus moves to the previous object in the tab order? Here is a sample form that I've been working with, and it has the grid with the specific settings we need: http://zootal.no-ip.info/stuff/VFP%20Stuff/ You want the form files for gridnavtest. Click on the grid, and then when the grid has the focus, try the left and right arrow keys. You can look at the simple code to see what I'm doing. Background: I'm using the grid in a calendar control, where each grid is a day of the month. I'd like to use the arrow keys to navigate from one date to the next, but so far have only got it to work in the forward direction. I can use code and manually setfocus to the desired control, but it would be cleaner if I could just stuff a shift-tab into the keyboard buffer. Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 233936
  - 20
    - database permission problem Hi guys, I moved the database to another directory and validate it. I can open and modify any table in the database, but other users can open in read only mode. I enabled full control permision, in all the physical files and direcories, for everyone, but still they can't write to the tables neither from the command window nor from an application. they also tried out with open database mydatabase exclusive Any help very appreciated TIA Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 233931
  - 21
    - Vista + Pageframe + ActiveX control = problem I am trying to put the DBI ctGrid on a page in a pageframe that is not the page that is visible when the form loads. When I run the program the grid bleeds through and always shows. This gets fixed when I click on the corresponding page and then everything runs fine. I have also noticed this problem with MS's date/time picker. Has anyone else had any problems with this and are there any workarounds? I have tried setting the visible property to false until the page is activated and that doesn't seem to work. I have also tried having the second page activated on loading and then programaticaly changing it after loading but that doesn't work either. Any idea if this will be fixed in VFP 9 SP2? Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 233911
  - 22
    - Determing if a table exists; if so, then open I want to determine if a table exists. If the table does exist, I want to USE it. Otherwise, I don't want to do anything. I thought there was something like... IF EXISTS(mytable) USE mytable in 0 ELSE * Do nothing. ENDIF ...But I cannot find a function like "EXISTS()." Thanks very much for any help. David Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 233910
  - 23
    - VFP remote views to sequel 2005 tables Just starting out trying to move VFP data to Sequel System written in VFP9 using Remote Views of 2 Sequel 2005 tables. 12 machines work fine, 3 hang when trying to open a parameterised view. They open the connection to Sequel database OK. Opens view of Sequel data OK gets stuck on opening parameterised view. I guess it must be after a parameter, but I'm sure its there. last log entry is "use vRegisteredForSaleIn" from OpenUpdateableView, cFactFundCode is reported as blank from this procedure. Any suggestions as to what to do next would be greatly appreciated. I've reloaded latest MDAC just in case that was the cause. Diane **************************************************************************************************************** ***Relevant code*** setParametersForViews() logAction("View Parameters Set") ***********CAN'T MAKE IT WORK FOR NOW.************************* IF plRegisteredToVersion logAction("Open Updatable View RegisteredForSaleIn") OpenUpdateableView("RegisteredForSaleIn","","Fund_code,countryCode") logAction("Open Updatable View RegisteredForSaleIn Finished") logAction("Open Updatable View vRegisteredForSaleIn cFactFundCode="+cFactFundCode) OpenUpdateableView("vRegisteredForSaleIn","","Fund_code,countryCode") logAction("Open Updatable View Finished") endif *************************************************************** procedure setParametersForViews Public cFactFundCode *vRegisteredForSaleIn (FSUnitProfiles) cFactFundCode=' ' ********************************************************************* Procedure OpenUpdateableView LParameters lcView, lcAlias,lcKeyFieldList logAction("View set to "+lcView) IF lcView="vRegistered" logAction("Parameter "+cFactFundCode) endif IF EMPTY(lcAlias) lcAlias=lcView logAction("Alias set to "+lcAlias) endif if used('&lcView') select &lcView ELSE select 0 logAction("use "+lcView) use (lcView) shared ALIAS &lcAlias logAction(lcView+"Opened") CURSORSETPROP("KeyFieldList",lcKeyFieldList,lcAlias) logAction("KeyFieldList updated") CURSORSETPROP("SendUpdates",.t.,lcAlias) logAction("SendUpdates set") CURSORSETPROP("Buffering",5,lcAlias) logAction("Table Buffering set") ENDIF ******************************************************************************************* View code SELECT Re.fund_code, Re.countrycode, Re.derived, Cn.name AS countryname; FROM ; factsheets!RegisteredForSaleIn Re,; factsheets!country Cn; WHERE Re.countrycode = Cn.code; AND ( fund_code ) = ( ?cFactFundCode ) (Country is still a FoxPro table) Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 233905
  - 24
    - Microsoft Visual FoxPro 9.0 Service Pack 2 and "Sedna" - Beta Any comments for that? http://www.microsoft.com/downloads/details.aspx?familyid=05a0e7c9-43c1-417f- 8810-ae7d7c66bac8&displaylang=en ioannis Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 233904
  - 25
    - Mouse droppings Hey folks, Anyone seen this? Comments? Suggestions? Form has pageframe with 3 pages, 2nd page has 2 containers with 2 listboxes ("mover" type u/i) When first run, activate page 2 and the mouse will not select in any of the lists. (Keyboard selection is fine.) Activate page 3 and come back to page 2 and all is fine. This is in a form that hasn't changed in 6 years. If I run an exe built with VFP8 in the VFP9 IDE, the problem is present. The same exe works fine in VFP8. Dan Tag: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) Tag: 233893

I'm starting to use Vista as development environment. One problem occurs
when I create an executable. When using XP i normally build the exe directly
to a folder under Program files, however Vista does not allow this. So
please suggest hos I can handle this.

Top

Re: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) by Anders

Anders
Thu Jun 28 14:59:17 CDT 2007

Hi Zeke,

You're supposed to have you own stuff in Documents and Settings or in a
development folder far far away from Program Files.
SET DEFAULT TO C:\PROJECTS\ProjectX
You can use a ProjectHook class to automate the command so that any project
you create will switch default to its HomeDir.

-Anders

"Zeke" <zeke@nowhere.com> wrote in message
news:8E3BEA05-BD1A-4EAD-93ED-FCE538E990E3@microsoft.com...
> I'm starting to use Vista as development environment. One problem occurs
> when I create an executable. When using XP i normally build the exe
> directly to a folder under Program files, however Vista does not allow
> this. So please suggest hos I can handle this.

projeckts

Top

Re: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) by Josh

Josh
Thu Jun 28 15:47:35 CDT 2007

disable uac
create a manifest for vfp9.exe to give it full rights
or
follow microsofts new guidelines -- which says not to use program files
directories for any dymaic data.

On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:03:48 +0200, "Zeke" <zeke@nowhere.com> wrote:

>I'm starting to use Vista as development environment. One problem occurs
>when I create an executable. When using XP i normally build the exe directly
>to a folder under Program files, however Vista does not allow this. So
>please suggest hos I can handle this.

Top

Re: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) by Altman

Altman
Thu Jun 28 16:53:21 CDT 2007

On Jun 28, 2:03 pm, "Zeke" <z...@nowhere.com> wrote:
> I'm starting to use Vista as development environment. One problem occurs
> when I create an executable. When using XP i normally build the exe directly
> to a folder under Program files, however Vista does not allow this. So
> please suggest hos I can handle this.

Right click on the shortcut for FoxPro and click on properties. Click
on the compatibility tab and put a select "Run this program as
administrator"

The one downside I see doing this is you don't find in development the
stuff that might not work because of UAC. The better option is to
build it to a different folder.

Top

Re: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) by Craig

Craig
Fri Jun 29 09:57:40 CDT 2007

IMO, bad advice. UAC is there for a reason. The end users of the application
could be running with it on and turning it off on the development machine
could hide issues the end users will have.

--
----
Craig Berntson
MCSD, Visual FoxPro MVP
Salt Lake City Fox User Group

"Josh Assing" <XjoshX@jAssing.com> wrote in message
news:oh7883pchq40e78fop90eaknlvff82fo8c@4ax.com...
> disable uac
> create a manifest for vfp9.exe to give it full rights
> or
> follow microsofts new guidelines -- which says not to use program files
> directories for any dymaic data.
>
> On Thu, 28 Jun 2007 21:03:48 +0200, "Zeke" <zeke@nowhere.com> wrote:
>
>>I'm starting to use Vista as development environment. One problem occurs
>>when I create an executable. When using XP i normally build the exe
>>directly
>>to a folder under Program files, however Vista does not allow this. So
>>please suggest hos I can handle this.
>

Top

Re: Develop using Vista (VFP9 sp2) by Josh

Josh
Fri Jun 29 18:40:17 CDT 2007

I didn't mean to advise one over the other-- I was just tossing out ways to get
around it; which was the OP question

On Fri, 29 Jun 2007 08:57:40 -0600, "Craig Berntson" <craig@craigberntson.com>
wrote:

>IMO, bad advice. UAC is there for a reason. The end users of the application
>could be running with it on and turning it off on the development machine
>could hide issues the end users will have.

Top