ScottMonroe
Fri Mar 14 14:39:03 CDT 2008
James,
I tried deleting the RSG and recreating it with a different name, with no
change. I know that if I create the AD object it will probably work, but was
hoping not to have to go through that process, but will give it a try.
Okay, I've created the AD object, and things look good in System Manager
with the store showing up in the RSG. I have to wait for a tape to be
reloaded into my changer and then I'll be able to see if it actually
restores. If it does restore, I'll post a detailed explanation of what I did
for other's reference.
Thanks,
Scott
"Jamestechman" wrote:
> Heard about this before but never found a solution. Did you try
> deleting your RSG and trying again. If not you could try creating it
> manually. I've never tried so I cannot guarantee if the method works
> or not.
>
>
> Try creating it manually through adsiedit. Create a database to
> recover using one that does get listed. Then open adsiedit. Find that
> store object in recovery storage groups. Now you want to use this as a
> template and re-home all attributes to the one that does not list ie.
> cn; dn msExchMailboxGUID; msExchOrigMDB etc.
>
> Basically just go through all properties that are configured and
> replace anything that references the one you used as template to the
> one that won't list. There shouldn't be more than a few.
>
> Also for grins see if this applies.
>
> Recovery storage group functionality disabled
>
http://technet.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa997964(EXCHG.80).aspx
>
>
>
> James Chong (MVP)
> MCITP | EMA; MCSE | M+, S+,
> Security+, Project+, ITIL
> msexchangetips.blogspot.com
>
> On Mar 13, 2:20 pm, Scott Monroe
> <ScottMon...@discussions.microsoft.com> wrote:
> > I'm trying to recover a mailstore using the RSG, but when I go to add the
> > mailstore to it, the one I need is missing, but the other 2 mailstores from
> > the same SG are listing, along with all other mailstores from the other SG's.
> >
> > Any suggestions on why it's not being listed and possible fixes?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Scott
>
>