Receiving my own mail

TheMSsForum.com: The Microsoft Software Forum

The MSS Forum ‹ Entourage
- Archive
  - Biz
  - MCSE
  - CRM
  - Drivers
  - Framework
  - ADO
  - ASP
  - Compact
  - Forms
  - Dotnet
  - C#
  - VB
  - FontpageGen
  - Excel
  - WorkSheet
  - Exchange
  - Setup
  - Fox
  - Fontpage
  - ASP
  - IIS
  - Entourage
  - Money
  - Messanger
  - PocketPC
  - Powerpoint
  - Project
  - Publisher
  - Excel
  - VB
  - Security
  - Portal
  - Services
  - SQLServerDev
  - SVCS
  - SQLServer
  - VB
  - VC
  - MFC
  - ExcelGen

- Previous
 - 1
 - My email has stopped working ever since the Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Email Client: imap Ever since Apple transitioned over to MobileMe, I have had repeated problems with my .mac account via Entourage. Beforehand I had no problems receiving or sending emails. Has anyone else had problems regarding this? Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99961
 - 2
 - A Call for Reassessment A Call for Reassessment A Letter Addressed to Intellectual and Opinion Leaders in the 'West' =46rom the Conference on Glorification of the Sanctities of Islam Held in Kuwait city, Kuwait, January 22-24, 2007 - Preamble In the name of Allah, the Unique One, who is no God but He, and no one deserves to be worshiped but He, the Lord of the prophets: Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and Muhammad, the seal of all prophets, (Peace be upon all of them). This letter was drafted by a group of Muslim scholars and intellectuals who recently gathered to discuss development in the relationship with the 'West', and the best and most logical manner to deal with the acceleration of infringements on the sanctities of Islam and Muslims by individuals, and by governmental, religious, and media organizations in the 'West'. We, the signatories to this letter, address western thinkers, intellectuals, and decision makers as well as the leaders of grass- root movements and religious institutions. To all of them we state the following regarding this current phenomenon: When an entire nation faces repeated and accelerated aggressions directed towards what is respected and holy to its people by groups from other nations, reactions will emerge and questions will be raised as to the rationale behind these transgressions, and the environment which created the milieu for these continued attacks. Nonetheless, it is for the benefit of all humanity that these transgressions and attacks come to an end. No other community on the face of the earth today suffers from occupation, injustice and transgression from certain western forces more than Muslim world. No other peoples or nations are currently mocked, ridiculed, and hence suffered because of the western attacks on their religion and their holy symbols as much as the Muslim world. This phenomenon has reached an unacceptable level of infringement and injustice considering that these actions are directed at a worldwide culture and exceptional civilization with an immense history and against a divine religion representing more than a quarter of the world population. For this reason, we believe it is important to draw attention to our position concerning this phenomenon to allow for mistakes to be addressed and path to be rectified. - Present Relationship We realize that the western perspective regarding Islam was not initially positive for several reasons, the most important of which is that Europeans did not deal directly with Islamic culture which led to a continuing sense of unease and apprehension. Disunited Europeans eventually attempted to create a Christian front against Islam. Islam became the exterior enemy capable of unifying a Europe which was until then no more than scattered groups killing one another. There is no doubt that generalizations may lead to misjudgments. In this regard, we are aware of how Europe and America have attempted over past centuries to rid themselves of the western civilization=92s deficiencies in dealing with the concept of =91Others=92. However, incidents during the past few years have totally shattered these attempts. In this letter, when we address the 'West', we mean western society in general. We are not only addressing the forces antagonistic to Islam, but also those who are fair, and we realize that the 'West' is diverse. - Examples of Aggressions We draw the attention of the intellectuals and opinion leaders of the 'West' to the gravity of the increasing and accelerating attacks. It is unconceivable and unacceptable to witness - in less than three years - a series of attacks on what is sacred to us beginning with an assault on our Lord's holy book (the Noble Quran) by the authoring, publication and distribution of a parody of the Quran in which the beliefs, legislations, ethics, and history of our religion are ridiculed. This was followed by a prejudiced and malicious campaign against the person of our Prophet (peace be upon him) describing him with the most repulsive attributes and picturing him with the most mocking and ridiculing caricatures. The source of these attacks emerged from a Danish newspaper spreading to several European countries where certain news outlets supported and others encouraged the spread of these caricatures. The situation grew even worse when the Roman Catholic Pope described Islam, the Quran, and the Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him) in a prepared public speech with attributes that are unjust, to say the least. Muslims worldwide are also closely following the repeated assaults on the noble Quran at the hands of American soldiers in detention centers of Abu Ghraib in Iraq and Guantanamo in Cuba where the degradation of human beings was coupled with the humiliations of the Quran. It continues to surprise Muslims worldwide to follow the news about infringements of personal freedoms of Muslim citizens and residents in the largest capitals of western countries. Let us also not forget the repeated attacks on mosques in occupied Iraq and Afghanistan sometimes through direct destruction, or by other means such as forced entry into mosques under the pretext of rooting out and killing militants, which, in turn, leads to the killing of innocent people inside these mosques. There is also an air of superiority transpiring from the sayings of many leaders and politicians, the writings of some thinkers, and also in diverse media productions such as movies, series and novels that made it a habit of stigmatizing Islam with defects, violence and terrorism. We are perplexed by the continued lack of public outcry from the majority of intellectual and opinion leaders against these repeated acts of aggression which occur in your countries in the 'West'. It leads us to question which side you belong to: the side of freedom for all, protecting human rights of others, and supporting the global ethic of respect, or the side of repression and curbing other people=92s desires to preserve their own identities? We indeed ask: Are you siding with the insolence and mockery of the prophets in the name of the freedom of expression, or siding with freedom against the phenomenon of repression and suppression? - The Attack on the Prophet of Islam (Peace be upon him) Although some civilizations have engaged in wars against Muslims in the past, most have not retained the hatred heritage toward the Prophet of Islam when compared with the small countries of Europe and their churches at the same time. Furthermore, Christian animosity toward Islam and the Prophet of Islam outside of western Europe were never transformed into what has been observed in western Europe; an historical abhorrence which was celebrated and emphasized during religious occasions and was portrayed on the walls and ceilings of cathedrals and houses of worship. It is a phenomenon worth studying and it is more important to limit its negative impact. We question the reasons behind the endeavors of certain people in the 'West' to destroy the reputation of historical and contemporary role models. For those who live with no role models, we believe they will have no future; and a nation with no sense of history is like a building with no foundation. Is this, perhaps, the fundamental raison d=92etre for the focused attack on our Prophet? Do certain movements in the 'West' - calling for materialism and decadence - want human beings in general, and Muslims in particular, to abandon their desire to follow the steps of enlightened historical role models? We are convinced that attacks such as these recent ones on the best role models in our tradition are nothing but a clarion call in a chain of events attempting to eradicate the historical value of these exemplars. We remain confident that the Muslim world will never waver when it comes to defending the Prophet of Islam and all other Prophets. This is a dividing line which we will never allow it to be crossed on the false pretext of free expression of opinions or views. Furthermore, the Muslim world can not be forced to accept all the outcomes of freedom of expression in the 'West' just as the 'West' does not want to accept some of the outcomes of other human freedoms in the =91East=92. We call upon western intellectuals to take a strong stance in dealing with these attacks. We expect they will be more concerned with protecting the accomplishments of the western civilization rather than protecting the =91rights=92 claimed by some in the 'West' to scorn others and ridicule Prophets. - The Aggression on Al-Aqsa Mosque (The Mosque of all the Prophets) We consider the occupation and repeated attacks on Al-Aqsa mosque to be yet another example of aggressive behavior on what is considered sacred and holy to Muslims everywhere. These transgressions are happening with the support or silence of most western governments and the approval of some western religious movements as well. It is worth noting that the Veto right of United States of America is rarely used in the United Nations for any purpose but to defend repeated Zionist attacks on occupied Palestinian land and to protect Jewish domination on Al-Aqsa mosque, which Muslims worldwide will never forfeit. We reiterate our inquiries to the intellectual and opinion leaders: What is your position regarding these transgressions on what is sacred to Muslims in Palestine, and regarding injustices incurred by the Palestinian people who are deprived of their most basic rights. We observe the blatant contradiction of the 'West' when it calls upon Muslims to adopt western forms of democracy while the same western governments agonize over what kind of free elections and what form of government Palestinians can be free to choose. The silence of western intellectuals and thinkers about these transgressions on what is sacred to Muslims in Palestine is humiliating; it is a stain on the foreheads of those who champion freedom and democracy in the 'West'. We call upon you to remove this stain by joining forces with many impartial intellectuals worldwide who are actively defending the rights of peoples and nations to liberate their occupied lands, to recover their holy sites, to fight for their rights to freely choose their representatives and those who would manage their political and social affairs, to retain their human dignity and their ability to resist humiliation and occupation, and to stand against injustice using all legitimate means. - Mocking the Islamic Veil Personal freedom is central to western democracies. It can be seen in western contemporary social life and also in intellectual literature. It should then be one of the fundamental rights of women in a democracy to have the personal freedom to choose their own clothes as far as they are not contradicting any general moral or social value. The Muslim world is astonished to watch the increased attacks and mockery of the veil of Muslim women in the 'West'. These attacks directly contradict democratic principles which are currently being promoted in the Muslim world. The world's women-rights groups have not taken any concerted steps to defend the rights of Muslim Women. We cannot help but wonder how the right of nudity is accepted and defended while the right of decency is attacked and questioned? One of the basic human rights in the 'West' is the right for one=92s identity to be preserved and even protected and not attacked. How can the 'West' allow attacks on its own Muslim citizens for exercising the right to wear what suit them? Furthermore, we ask: what happened to the religious, social, and intellectual heritage of the western world? Modest western women would =96and still do=96 wear decent clothing which closely resemble the Islamic dress code as in the cases of nuns and countryside women? If the 'West' has abandoned this legacy of decency, does it mean the rest of the world must follow suit? We reject the 'war on decency' in today's world. We also do not accept the notion that this is the price to be paid for modernity and prosperity. Could the attacks on the veil of Muslim women result from the fact that, in itself, it represents just another symbol of decency? The laws and regulations that were passed recently by several European countries to limit the rights of women to wear the veil appear to be a clear negation of their civil liberties. We wonder: is this happening because of a continued sense of animosity toward Islam by some, or because of the anti-decency position of some liberal supporters, or is it simply to please supporters of social and moral decadence? These are questions directed at western thinkers and intellectuals by the Muslim world. Our expectation is that they must stand firm against double standards in western intellectual norms which this phenomenon points to. - Confrontation of Ideas Islam has been stained with numerous accusations in the last few years by a group of thinkers and religious and political personalities in the 'West'. The accusations range from allegations that Islam has spread by the sword, that 'Reason' has no place in the Islamic intellect, that Islam is a religion of terrorism and backwardness, and other false accusations. This letter does not aim at providing a detailed refutation of each of these allegations. We, nevertheless, highlight the fact that they contradict rational discussions and also breach basic research principles accepted worldwide. It seems, however, that these allegations correspond well with the policy of =91War of Ideas=92 which some American influential institutions are calling for in order to alter Islam. We recognize that Islam has propagated through Jihad for the cause of Allah and it also has spread by other peaceful means. In fact, all civilizations have acquired and used force to preserve and defend their accomplishments and values. Moreover, we draw your attention to the fact that the concept of =91Just War=92 was accepted by the European Church and the secular movements in order to preserve the interests of the western civilization. Why then deny the same philosophical position when it comes to Islam? Any person studying world history would realize that millions of people in many countries such as Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines as well as some Asian and African nations have accepted Islam even though they were never invaded or attacked by any Muslim military force. Another question: Why does Islam continue to grow worldwide nowadays and more particularly in the 'West' with no use of any military force to propagate it? It is happening, we believe, because of Islam's inherited influence and its harmony with the best of human nature. As for the fundamental place of Reason in Islamic civilization in comparison with other civilizations, we must begin by stressing that historians unanimously agree that western history is full of incidents which either disregard the role of reason or idolize it; thus in fact, moving from one extreme to the opposite. On the other hand, the Muslim world has been known for its moderation in the use of reason to properly serve humanity. We ask: why do certain religious leaders in the 'West' try to attack the role of reason in Islam? Is it to conceal deficiencies they encounter within their own faith, or to align forces with the secular movement in its confrontation with Islam? We call upon Church leaders to reexamine their own beliefs beginning with the concept of divinity. Upon rigorous introspection and research, they will perhaps recognize the more-than-ample rational contradictions that this concept holds. The overpowering domination of Church leaders and their hostility towards science and reason could have been the main reason for the revolution against the Church in the past, and could also have inspired the materialistic and atheist wave which has developed throughout western countries. We invite western intellectuals and thinkers to unshackle themselves from an intellectual position that was inherited from unjust religious wars, which the 'West' itself called =91Crusades=92; wars that perfectly fit today=92s definition of =91terrorist warfare=92. As for those who accuse us today of terrorism, they were and still are the cause of most of the horrors and catastrophes of wars that have decimated tens of millions of persons in our contemporary world, especially the two World Wars, which the Muslims had no role in igniting. Intellectuals in the Islamic world continue to notice the changes taking place in the tactics used by some adversaries in the 'West' who are shifting their position from attacking Muslims to attacking Islam, and from efforts to change Muslims to attempts to 'reform' Islam. We pronounce: Islam is in no need for a contemporary Protestantism, which would corrupt it, because Islam is well known for its ability to renew itself. Furthermore, Islam is spreading with no need to modify it. We question then, why some in the 'West' demand to alter Islam? It is interesting for us to note that extreme egoism has caused some western intellectuals and decision makers to call for intellectual and religious reforms in a faith in which they barely know. They call for the reform of Islam simply because it is different from what was agreed upon in contemporary Christianity when it merged with western liberalism to form a new religion whose followers are arrogant enough to demand that others must change their own positions to match and adhere to the norms of this new religion. We are confident that our religion, which will never be altered, is quite capable of healing the problems of western civilization. This may explain the uphill struggle of some opponents in the 'West' who are trying to get rid of the pure form of Islam. Furthermore, we believe that to maintain an unaltered Islam would obliterate for some the =91End of History=92 myth. We strongly reject any attempt to repress the right of our community to adhere to its own intellectual reasoning system. We affirm at the same time our interest to get acquainted with other civilizations and to benefit from what they have, and is useful to us. It is important to stress that the western thoughts in the domain of values, morals, legislation, and creeds are neither universal nor sacred. Attempts to make them as such will never succeed. Muslim societies in general are beginning to believe that attacks on Islam by some westerners under the banner of =91War of Ideas=92 only reflect their own fear of the enlightened message of Islam which stands firm against western domination. What you are accustomed to call the =91War of Ideas=92 is a preference which we do not approve of. Nevertheless, we will never hesitate to face up to whatever hurts our sentiments. The theatre of war in the field of ideas is our own battleground. We will excel in this war not necessarily because of the superiority of our intellectuals or decision makers, but rather because of our unwavering confidence and certainty in our fundamental principles. We are confident of our ability not only to reveal, but also to cure the severe contradictions western civilization has in the domain of ideas, intellect, and beliefs. - How to Explain the Attacks on our Sanctities? It appears from the official statements of some western leaders and from verbal or written opinions representing the prevailing intellectual trend today that the attack on the Islamic world is not an isolated event or in response to a specific incident. It rather appears to be the outcome of a master plan that was carefully constructed to eclipse the impact of the Islamic community on the world. The development of this master plan could be detected in the use of the word =91Crusade=92 used by U.S. President George W. Bush in describing his open war on what is being called =91terrorism=92 in Iraq, Afghanistan, and elsewhere. It could also explain statements by the former Italian Prime Minister, Silvio Berlusconi, who claimed that western civilization was superior to that of Islam. Berlusconi said that Islam was =91racist, inflammatory, and uneducated=92 ignoring Islam=92s long history of accomplishments. Such statements were also echoed by the former German Chancellor who remarked that he would not allow Islam to become a threat to the European civilization. An important question comes to mind here: What is the real purpose of this multifaceted attack on Islam? If the explanation is the freedom of expression in criticizing other religions, then we do not see in contemporary western literature similar attacks on other religions such as Hinduism, Judaism, and Buddhism. We only observe continuous attacks on Islam. We also wonder: could this campaign of aggression be in response to recent political incidents? We must also disagree with this reasoning because aggressions against Islam have long preceded the recent events when a small group of Muslims has been accused of initiating aggression. Many Muslim leaders and intellectuals perceive current attacks on Islamic rituals and sanctities as a direct result of the realization of some western leaders and intellectuals that the Islamic world is experiencing a revival, and is going through a fundamental renaissance. It also appears they realize that the Islamic world is resuming its mission to reform humanity to bring real happiness, and that Islam is becoming a real contender in intellectual and civilizational areas. We examine with interest the report published by the =91Ontario Consultants on Religious Tolerance=92 which estimated the number of Muslims in 2003 to be 1.226 billions representing 19% of the world population that year. The report also confirms that Islam is the only religion whose adherents=92 proportion is increasing while the proportion of the other major religions=92 adherents is decreasing. The organization also predicts that before 2023, Islam will be the world=92s first religion. Could these and other similar statistics be the driving factor behind the return of the fear of the Islamic world among certain western thinkers and leaders? The question is directed to you. We are convinced of double-standards when we witness western leaders and intellectuals stress upon the value of individual liberty and democratic processes while at the same time they suppress freedom rights for Muslims in western countries. They promote the intolerance of Islamic symbols appearing in the daily lives of Muslims in the 'West', and even attempt to harm Muslims in their own homelands. Moreover, they continuously export oppression and colonial domination to the Islamic world. We notice that the atmosphere of hostility from some western leaders has permeated some populations under the effect of the media and the hostile policies which are being falsely justified both culturally and intellectually. We believe the western media is no longer completely independent from policymaking. It rather appears sharing roles with decision makers. As a result of the media=92s ability to incite people and disseminate policies, a more dangerous effect is also developing: It is the deterrence of nations from accepting the divine guidance. It is interesting to note that the religious movement in the 'West' has strongly participated in this campaign by either concealing the truth about Islam, attempting to defame it and alienate people away from it, or by hiding the explicit =91Good News=92 pointing to of the prophet-hood of Muhammad (Peace be upon him) in the Old and New Testaments. There is another trend of concerted political and media attacks on any impartial western writing which appears to be unbiased towards Muslims. This trend confirms to us that certain western political and intellectual forces consider it in their best interest that people in the 'West' get a somber image of Muslims and the religion of Islam. - In Conclusion We affirm the importance of proper inter-cultural dialogue in reaching the truth and limiting unjust aggression on others. Nonetheless, we are certain that talking about dialogue for some people is nothing more than a way to justify actions of the 'West' and to suppress the dissenting opinions and the authentic Islamic thinking and ideals. We stress the fact that communication between civilizations is quite possible in today's world but on the condition of establishing justice and fairness. The contemporary western civilization is an outcome of the accumulation of the accomplishments of all previous world civilizations and their civic and progressive creativities. Nevertheless, the 'West' desires to monopolize its benefits for itself, and only for those who circle in its orbit. The 'West' appears to be adamant about depriving the Muslim world of the means of technological and materialistic progress to keep it occupied with inter-fighting and struggles fueled and instigated by the 'West' itself. The stagnation of Muslims in development and creativity - due to many reasons - is an exception to the norms of the history of the Islamic civilization. This stagnation does not indicate that we are a backward community in terms of civilization or values. On the contrary, the Muslim world community encompasses a wealth of morals, ideals, values, and sources of guidance and enlightenment, and it will never abandon them. It will always carry the responsibility of calling humanity to these virtues. We call upon you to reconsider the position of claiming civilizational supremacy over others. We further urge intellectual and opinion leaders among you to maintain neutrality and fairness with regard to Islam, its noble values, and its good virtues which has bequeathed humanity over ages. The current situation of our Islamic world might not be great, but the foundations of Islam in creed, legislation, civilization, and ethics are nonetheless magnificent and applicable to every time and place. Furthermore, it is important to state that while the 'West' has achieved strong materialistic progress and technological innovation, the foundations of its civilization as they currently stand are not beneficial to humanity in the long run. The defects of our current situation do not affect our conviction of the value of our religion and our civilization for humanity. This is why we are addressing you, the opinion leaders and decision makers, and we address through you the silent majority of the western peoples as well as those who are implicated in the campaigns of aggression on our sanctities and our resources and we demand from all the following: First: Stop inflicting injustice upon us. Bring to an end the interference in our affairs, and stop attacking what is sacred and holy to our Muslim world community. Continuing these acts of aggression will not serve your vital economic interests in our countries. The only way to preserve these interests is through justice and fairness. Second: We call upon you to join forces with us to stop media and cultural campaigns which insult what is sacred to us, ridicule our noble Quran, and attack the character of our Prophet. Otherwise, the Muslim community will have no choice but to continue exercising its legitimate right to resist the western oppression in all its forms: cultural, civilizational, political, and military. Third: Rather than allocating resources and efforts on current campaigns aiming at containing and dominating us culturally, economically, politically and militarily, we urge you to allocate some of your intellectual and research efforts to determine the real causes of the rising civilizational conflict between us. We also urge you to research and study the real essence of the message of our Prophet Muhammad (Peace be upon him). We call upon you to open your minds and hearts to comprehend and appreciate the universality of Islam and the realities of our religion before attacking them, or calling people away from them. Fourth: It is more important for western intellectuals and leaders to focus on reforming their own countries before interfering in the affairs of other nations and civilizations. The 'West' is undeniably in need of several fundamental reforms. It is far more imperative to tackle these reforms than to impose western reform projects on the Muslim world. We are confident that western nations and societies are heading towards a grievous abyss of incoherence, deterioration, and cultural bankruptcy if their leaders continue their approach of exporting corruption and inequalities to the rest of the world. All these mounting abuses will eventually return back as arrows hitting the hearts of those who spread and propagate them. To reiterate: This letter is a call to the intellectual leaders in western countries to implement a =91Western Reform Initiative=92 to rekindle the true virtues of faith which all Prophets called for, to pay due respect to these Prophets (Peace be upon them), to aid the innocent, and to prevent injustice and aggression in the entire world and not just in the 'West'. Before making calls to reform the Islamic world (or the Greater Middle East as they call it), the thinkers and leaders of the 'West' should adopt a project to reform their own societies with regard to family values, marriage and virtue. We also call for a western economic reform, which will protect people and individuals from being =91terrorized=92 by corporations and capitalistic market forces. This reform will bring back respect and appreciation to moral values rather than market values. It is a reform project which will enable the 'West' to join global forces working together in order to stop the alienation of the underprivileged, and to reinstate intrinsic value to real education. Now is the right time to launch this initiative to rescue the 'West' from the dominance of an atheist minority seeking to destroy all contemporary religious values and moral standards. Fifth: The 'West' must apologize for its repeated assaults on Islam. Furthermore, it must apologize for the numerous crimes that were committed in its name against Muslims during, before, and after the colonial era. Our message to those who are determined to continue their aggression against our Muslim community is this: The propagation of Islam never ceased when it was attacked at any time in the past nor will it come to an end if it is harassed in this era or until the end of age. The Muslim world has a unique resiliency; a capacity to rebound after setbacks as witnessed throughout history. The role of our Muslim community will not be limited to defending our religion and what is sacred to us. It will also extend to expose the tactics of the enemies of humanity. Citizens of the western world will come to recognize that what the enemies of Muslims in the 'West' are doing will harm the western world far more than it will harm the Muslim community. The 'West' could possibly lose the advantages of economic trade with 1.25 billion people representing an overwhelming market share of world consumers. It will risk trade relationships with many Muslim countries, which retain a vast wealth of all current natural energy resources needed to fuel the wheel of modernity and development. These are the same Muslims who carry the largest share of the burden of sustaining human fairness and justice. We believe that welcoming the western technological advancements, which are beneficial to humanity, does neither indicate nor necessitate trading our own values in order to merge into western cultures. We reject blind adherence to the 'West' or anyone else. At the same time, we do not object to trade and exchange benefits with the 'West' or to make use of its technological and industrial innovations. We call upon the intellectual and opinion leaders in the 'West' to truly understand the religion of Islam, and the Muslim community. What motivates us to do so, and our evidence to it, is the divine order in the Book of Allah =96 The Noble Quran, which we find to be the very best way to conclude our letter to you. The glorious God states: "Say: 'O people of the Scripture: Come to a word that is just between us and you, that we worship none but God, and that we associate no partners with Him, and that none of us shall take others as lords besides God.' Then, if they turn away, say: 'Bear witness that we are Muslims.'" [Quran,3:64] http://www.islamhouse.com/ Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99954
 - 3
 - organizing incoming mail in entourage Email Client: pop How can i automatically move incoming mail DIRECTLY into SUB-FOLDERS within the INBOX? Thanks Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99949
 - 4
 - Entourage or Office:Mac v.X update Version: v.X Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Email Client: pop I just want to get the latest update for v.X that I can without an extra cost. Where can I go to do this? It seems that I need an update in order to sync with iPhone. Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99945
 - 5
 - Creating table for text in Entourage task notes Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: pop I would like to create a table to better see some text in the notes section of Entourage tasks. Is this possible, and if so, how? Thanks very much. Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99944
 - 6
 - recurring events in calender Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: Exchange every time i go to close an event that i have added a recurrence to in my calender i cant - i can either maximise or reduce but i cant save recurring events - any ideas please? Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99943
 - 7
 - Sending but not receiving mail Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: pop Hi, I have the home and student version of office 2008. I use the laptop for both personal and work. I can receive emails on my work POP, but am unable to send or reply emails from Entourage. I copied the setting exactly as Outlook on my Paralles side of the Mac. Do you have any suggestions? Best, Tammy Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99939
 - 8
 - recurring tasks after task is completed Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) When I started to use Entourage, I thought that the recurrence pattern option "after the task is complete, create a new task every X d/w/m/y" was going to be great. My problem is that it creates a new task from the due date, not from the completion date if the completion date is later than the due date. If I wanted recurring tasks from the due date, I could simply set the task to recur every X d/w/m/y. Is there a way to have Entourage generate a new task calculated from the actual completion date? Am I missing something somewhere? Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99938
 - 9
 - Bcc question > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3299512986_1661607 Content-type: text/plain; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit iMac OS X 10.4.11 Entourage X v. 10.1.6 The Bcc feature doesn't seem to be doing what I expected it to be doing. I send out an e-mail with my address in the "To:" address box and multiple addresses of other recipients in the Bcc field. When responses to my e-mail come back to me some of the incoming e-mails show my address in the "To:" box and others come back showing every address that I entered in the Bcc field in the "To:" field. All the time that I have been using Bcc I was under the impression that everyone receiving that e-mail would not even know that it had been sent to anyone else. Why would some people see all the other recipients and others can't? And what can I do to make sure that Bcc does what it's intended to do? Or have I been expecting too much? --B_3299512986_1661607 Content-type: text/html; charset="US-ASCII" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable <HTML> <HEAD> <TITLE>Bcc question</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> iMac OS X 10.4.11 Entourage X v. 10.1.6 The Bcc feature doesn't seem to be doing what I expected it to be doing.<BR= > I send out an e-mail with my address in the "To:" address box and= multiple addresses of other recipients in the Bcc field. When responses to my e-mail come back to me some of the incoming e-mails sh= ow my address in the "To:" box and others come back showing every = address that I entered in the Bcc field in the "To:" field. All the time that I have been using Bcc I was under the impression that eve= ryone receiving that e-mail would not even know that it had been sent to any= one else. Why would some people see all the other recipients and others can't? And wh= at can I do to make sure that Bcc does what it's intended to do? Or have I b= een expecting too much? </BODY> </HTML> --B_3299512986_1661607-- Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99936
 - 10
 - Re: SETTING UP 2 ACCOUNTS IN ENTOURAGE ON ONE MAC. From: Manny Rosario <rosariom4@verizon.net> Date: Mon, 21 Jul 2008 19:17:35 -0400 To: William Smith <mecklists@REM0VETH1S.comcast.net> Conversation: SETTING UP 2 ACCOUNTS IN ENTOURAGE ON ONE MAC. Subject: Re: SETTING UP 2 ACCOUNTS IN ENTOURAGE ON ONE MAC. Hello William, Everything is working. I just need to know if I need to have any of the boxes checked in the Accounts Setting box under Edit Account. There are advanced Receiving and Sending options and I need to know which one of those boxes need to be checked so I know everything is OK. Please advise. Thank you. Manny On 7/21/08 10:59 AM, in article ORgWzJ06IHA.2064@TK2MSFTNGP02.phx.gbl, "William Smith" <mecklists@REM0VETH1S.comcast.net> wrote: > Manny Rosario wrote: > >> I have just loaded my account and my wife¹s account on to our computer. >> We seem to be receiving and sending e-mail just fine but I want to make >> sure that I don¹t need to have any additional boxes checked under the >> advanced sending and receiving options in the ACOUNTS setting. Please help. > > Hi Manny! > > You haven't really given us much information. Are your accounts not > working? What type of accounts? > > What specifically isn't working as needed? Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99935
 - 11
 - Entourage Crashes Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Dear 2008 Users: In the past few days I have had several entourage crashes and the message I get is this: Microsoft entourage has encountered a problem and needs to close. We are sorry for the inconvenience There is a box for a check mark that says asks restart entourage, I check it and nothing happens, to reopen it I have to rebuild the database. Do you have any suggestions? Thank you vngiap Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99933
 - 12
 - Headers from a different newsgroup! Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: pop Messages from a different newsgroup on the same server have invaded a newsgroup I use and some of the postings that do belong there don't appear (I know they're there because they appear on the OWA version of the groups). OE and its successor have a procedure for resetting the groups that releases all the headers and all associated info, (Properties/local file/reset or somesuch) and then they can be reloaded. Is there a similar procedure for Entourage? (unsubscribing doesn't work). Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99931
 - 13
 - Entourage opens 137 times Version: 2004 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.4 (Tiger) Processor: Power PC Email Client: pop When I open the Entourage, it opens itself 137 times. What kind of problem is this?? Virus? Bug? Who can help me quickly? Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99930
 - 14
 - Typos missing letters Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: pop I had some problems with Entourage over the weekend and may have reset some defaults. One person I'm emailing with keeps receiving my emails riddled with missing letters and spaces (ie, typos) even though I'm sending them with proper spelling and punctuation. When I look back at our trail of emails from the past few weeks the problem goes back weeks even though it just started in the last couple of days. Any idea what's going on and how to fix this. He uses a PC. Perhaps it's a font issue? If so, what's the most compatible default font? Thanks. Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99927
 - 15
 - random vanishing e-mails Version: 2004 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.4 (Tiger) Email Client: imap Having trouble with missing e-mails; no pattern apparent. Occasional sent items aren't in the Entourage sent folder, even though they were received and are in the sent folder of my MobileMe/dotmac account. Occasional incoming e-mails are not arriving. And a couple of e-mails have vanished from my Entourage outbox without being sent at all - I've had to reconstruct them. Advice? Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99923
 - 16
 - Error 5.1.2 email address 65m 18934 yxg.6 Version: 2008 When sending Entourage Email group lists keeps on error 5.1.2 email address 65m 18934 yxg.6 (Error 17099). My Gmail provider allows 60 email addresses, but Entourage keeps on said error although with 20 email addresses. Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99914
 - 17
 - SETTING UP 2 ACCOUNTS IN ENTOURAGE ON ONE MAC. > This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand this format, some or all of this message may not be legible. --B_3299481062_757260 Content-type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit Hello, I have just loaded my account and my wife¹s account on to our computer. We seem to be receiving and sending e-mail just fine but I want to make sure that I don¹t need to have any additional boxes checked under the advanced sending and receiving options in the ACOUNTS setting. Please help. Thank you. --B_3299481062_757260 Content-type: text/html; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable <HTML> <HEAD> <TITLE>SETTING UP 2 ACCOUNTS IN ENTOURAGE ON ONE MAC.</TITLE> </HEAD> <BODY> Hello= , I have just loaded my account and my wife’s account on to our compute= r. We seem to be receiving and sending e-mail just fine but I want to make s= ure that I don’t need to have any additional boxes checked under the a= dvanced sending and receiving options in the ACOUNTS setting. Please help.<B= R> Thank you. </BODY> </HTML> --B_3299481062_757260-- Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99912
 - 18
 - Complexe HTML in signature Let me introduce myself. I'm Romain, I'm french and I'm working for an IT company in France. Unfortunatelly, my company isn't "mac friendly" yet. Only 2 of us (we are almost 250) are using Mac. The problem is, we are all using a similar email signature for outgoing emails. This signature is generated with HTML code and guess what: Entourage doesn't want it. I googled for an answer but I didn't find anything. Maybe one of your guys has a plugin to help me using my HTML signature. Any help is welcome. Thank y'all. Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99909
 - 19
 - Syncing Entourage 2008 with Outlook 207 Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Power PC Email Client: pop I would like to sync all my Entourage information into Outlook. While I am sure there is probably an easy way to do this I am not sure how. I want to sync all my contacts and calendar, notes, etc. information. Thanks for the assistance. Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99907
 - 20
 - Mail sort order problem Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: Exchange In my email list, when I click on the 'From' header, I expect it to sort all the emails alphabetically by name. And it does, but backwards, so that the Zs are at the top and the As at the bottom. This is kinda infuriating, because it's the opposite of what every other program does and I end up halfway down my list before I realize I'm scrolling in the wrong direction. Am I missing something obvious? I realize I can click again to get it to sort the other way, but that's not the point. Thanks Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99900
 - 21
 - Sync exchange folder with imap folder Hi. I have two email accounts configured in Entourage -- an exchange account and an imap account. I have a folder in my exchange account that I'd like to keep synced with a folder in my imap account. Is there any way to do this? Right now, I have emails *copied* from the exchange folder to the imap folder, but I'm looking for a true sync -- changes on each to be reflected on the other. Thanks. Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99893
 - 22
 - Entourage not synchronizing after update Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: Exchange After an automatic update on my iMac and Air on July 19th for Entourage, neither of the computers are synchronizing with my exchange server(Exchange 2007). My G5, that was not updated, is still working, so if my iPhone. Does anyone have a similar problem or any ideas on how to fix this? Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99889
 - 23
 - Can't Send or Receive Emails Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Since yesterday afternoon, I have not received emails into my entourage account. Now I am realizing that I can't send emails out either. When I send an email I get an error message that says... Error: HTTP error. The server is temporarily unable to fulfill the request Explanation: Mail could not be sent. Has anyone seen this before or help in anyway. Thanks in advance. Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99887
 - 24
 - AutoCorrect Problem for Multiple-Line Entries Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: Exchange I like an optional signature in my emails. So, a couple of years ago, I copied a signature block into AutoCorrect, and had it correct "aaa" to the signature block. Easy. However, two events seem to have caused a problem. First, I recently upgraded to Office 2008. Second, I changed jobs. When I deleted the previous signature block, I found that I could no longer paste text into AutoCorrect; I can only type it in. But I haven't found a way to type end-of-line characters, so my signature all comes up on one line... Any ideas? Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99886
 - 25
 - Entourage/MobileMe sync problematic Office 2008 and Leopard latest versions. Mac Pro and Macbook Pro. Syncing Entourage through sync services, Address Book, iCal, Truth etc does work but I get frequent sync messages saying that, for eg in iCal, that 2000 items will be deleted, 2000 added. Or similar in Address book. After backing up the Entourage database, I have let these go through in the hope that it would do it once or twice and then settle but it happens about once a day on either Mac. I only use Entourage on the desktop (although it is installed on the laptop) so I have a theory that it might be trying to sync with an older version of the Entourage database on the laptop - when I go on the road I copy the database across and copy it back.) So I've thought about uninstalling all trace of entrouage and its database from the Laptop and seeing if this fixes the problem.) Before I do that, anybody had similar issues and tried this? In general what are people's experience of MobileMe syncing when you've got Entourage in the frame as well? I tried it periodically with .Mac but always ended up switching it off for similar reasons to above. Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99881
- Next
 - 1
 - Sent attachments not readable Version: 2004 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.4 (Tiger) Processor: Power PC Email Client: pop Any attachments I add to my h Entourage e-mail messages become illegible to the recipient. The attachments work fine with mac mail. What is the problem here? Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99878
 - 2
 - After re-install can not ude my old identity Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: Exchange I had to reinstall Office onto my mac from a backup disc image. And now it will not update 12.10. I have rebuilt my identity but when I try to open it in Entourage is says the database is not compatible.I have tyried to import but does not allow me to import 2008 databases. The question is, I had a load of emails backed up on my computer (my Time Machine is not fuctioning so no back up). I would like to know where folders stores 'on my computer' are stored? So I can try and bring them back. My emails and calendars are ok as they synced with the exchange server. J Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99877
 - 3
 - Receiving email on two computers Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: pop hi guy's have entourage on two computers at home, and i'd like both computers to receive the same emails. i have a gmail account. how can i set this up?! please help thanks cheers reinout Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99876
 - 4
 - Disappearing Tasks Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel I just installed Office 2008 as an upgrade on my new iMac with OSX 10.5.4. I had previously used flagging on my address book list to select contacts to print. Apparently, the meaning of the flags changed and all my flagged items moved to the task list. I finally got them back, but now my other tasks keep disappearing. I import them from my Entourage 2004 file, but after a few seconds, they disappear again. This is not good. Hope someone has an idea to help me. Thanks in advance. Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99875
 - 5
 - Option gone: "After sending, move to ..." Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: pop Does anyone have ANY idea why the braintrust at Microsoft decided to eliminate the feature that allows you to save a message you are about to send to a specific folder after you send it? I just loaded the 2008 product, and am sitting here in stunned disbelief that this feature has been removed from Entourage. I mean, seriously, WTF? This is beyond astonishing. This is a standard feature in MS Outlook, and I use it heavily on my Windows machine, and until a few minutes ago, always on my MacBook with Entourage. How could this happen? How could the programmers upgrading Entourage decide that this function was expendable, whereas its equivalent in Outlook continues to be a standard feature? Now every time we send a message, we must copy it to Sent Messages, then go into Sent Messages and move it from there to the appropriate folder. What a supreme waste of time. I want to cry. This is SUCH a letdown. Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99870
 - 6
 - 2008 upgrade Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: Exchange A previous question regarding upgrading the student edition for the exchange support was asked. The reply stated that no upgrades were available for the student/home edition. I wanted a clarification as to whether this was the case for 2008 Office edition. I purchased the student edition of 2008. I had previously been under the impression that we would not be on an exchange server at work, and thus just got the student version. Can I upgrade the 2008 student version to the office one? I have only had it for a few months, and buying another 2008 version is a rather expensive option. Any advice? thanks -sgg Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99869
 - 7
 - Entourage - Verify and Rebuild Database Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: pop I have been having issues with sending attachments to multiple recipients and was getting error message 10799 about domain issues. I checked every email address and there was one error which I corrected. I am now getting an error message that says Error: - 4362. It is suggesting I verify and perhaps rebuild the entourage database. What is this all about, how do I do this and what are the impacts to personal folders etc? Cheers Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99868
 - 8
 - Receiving e mail Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: Exchange All of a sudden I am not receiving my e mail. I can send e mail but e mail not coming through. I have checked my account via webmail and mail on the server and being pushed to my iphone, but not comming through. Any ideas? Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99866
 - 9
 - Forwarding HTML in Entourage When I receive an email (i.e. Newlsetters w/ pics and links) and I try to forward them it only comes up as a text email. I have checked on the HTML box but still only comes across as HTML. How do I sent HTML documents If I use forward as an attachment can I edit the original document prior to sending? Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99862
 - 10
 - contacts Version: 2008 Email Client: pop How do I make more then one contact list or separate my contacts by category and create different lists? Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99856
 - 11
 - Entourage Local Inbox Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: imap I have configured Entourage with my mobileme acccount and I see all the folders and emails under this account in entourage and that matches what I see online. However when emails are sent to my mobileme account they will sometimes end up in the inbox under "My Computer". Does anyone know how this happens. I do not have any rules setup which would move certain emails. The result of this is that I cannot get at all my emails from anywhere as they become local to the machine and are removed from the server. Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99852
 - 12
 - Public Folders and Sent Dates Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: Exchange I have Entourage set up to connect via my corporate Outlook Web Access. Works brilliantly and means I rarely need VPN. When I drag an email from my inbox and drop it into a public folder for a project weird things happen. If you look in the public folder from my Mac using Entourage everything is fine and the email has the correct dates. If you view the public folder from Outlook on a windows machine the email has the Sent and Received dates set to the date that the email was dragged and dropped into the public folder. Looking into the header it would seem that Outlook sees it as being sent by the OWA server to the Exchange Server and then received by the Exchange server. I would hate to have to go back to setting my Entourage to connect to the internal Exchang server and then using VPN when out of the office as the current setup is so easy. However as I am one Mac user in an office of windows machines I may have little choice. Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99846
 - 13
 - Program applying one rule to all messages Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: pop I had rules setup in 2004. Upgraded to 2008. Fine except for one rule. The rule looks for e-mails from certain friends and moves them to the friends folder. However, since the upgrade to 2008 all messages that are not acted upon by other rules are dumped to the friends folder. However, I only want messages from certain people to be moved to the friends folder. I deleted the rule and reconstructed it, but the same problem persists. Suggestions? Thanks. Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99828
 - 14
 - EMAIL Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: pop Can't view outbox or sent messages as I can in Outlook on PC Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99824
 - 15
 - How to import csv calendar file in Entourage Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: pop I suspect it's pretty simple, but I can't seem to import a csv calendar file from exported from Outlook into my Entourage calendar...any advice? Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99821
 - 16
 - New to Entourage Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: pop I just set up my email accounts and it is pulling all the old emails off my server even after I delete them. How can I stop this from happening? Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99820
 - 17
 - Address book Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: pop How do I arrange my addresses by people's first name in the Entourage address book alphabetically - which is my preference Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99814
 - 18
 - disappearing toobar Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: pop one day i open my MS Word for Mac and the toolbars no longer show up. I go to view/toolbars menue and the ones i want are checked. I uncheck them, then check them again and they partially show up. When I start to use them they fill in. ???? is this a glitch? It drives me crazy. Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99808
 - 19
 - Is there a Main Identity Size Database Threshold? Hi, Is there a threshold size for the main identity database that should be cause for corruption worries? My current size is about 1.1 GB. Thanks. Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99800
 - 20
 - E-mail disappearing Version: 2004 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Intel Email Client: Exchange I have been using Entourage on my MacBook Pro (Leopard) at work for about three weeks now. I have had folders and e-mails located in my Cabinet disappear without a trace. I am current on my updates. What would be causing this? I am set up using Exchange. The others on my team who use Entourage are still using Tiger. Is it a Leopard issue? Anyone have any advice on how I can prevent this from happening in the future? Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99799
 - 21
 - I can send but not receive mail. Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) On a recently purchased macbook pro I am testing the trial version of microsoft office. I have set up 2 accounts, both are able to send mail but neither receive mail. All the info & passwords are correct. Where do you think the problem is?! Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99798
 - 22
 - Entourage lossing messages Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Power PC Email Client: pop Sometimes, when I start Entourage I get the Pop-Up Error: "Can#t open message file - it's gone". I'm not able to retrace the message. It just don't arrive. How can this happen? Thanks in advance, Clouseau Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99797
 - 23
 - Entourage Icon Disappeared From Dock? Hi, I have Office 2008. I turned on my computer this morning and the Entourage icon was missing from my Dock in OS X (10.5.4). I found this very strange. I had to go to Applications/Microsoft Office 2008 and re-drag it back to the dock. I have ruled out accidental removal from the dock, because I am 99.99% confident I didn't do that. What else could have caused this? Should I be worried? I am running Entourage (Office) 12.1.1. Thanks. Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99789
 - 24
 - Inbox issue Version: 2008 Operating System: Mac OS X 10.5 (Leopard) Processor: Power PC Email Client: pop Hi At some stage during the various upgrades to Leopard and Office 2008, my Entourage inbox has stared showing the computer's owner name rather than the specific recipient name in the 'to' column. There are three users here, and we have to open the message to see who was meant to receive it. It's shown like this: ownername<sally@isp.com>. I can't seem to find the source of the problem. There's nothing in the account settings within Entourage, which suggests that it occurred when I installed Office 2008. I have no idea how to change any other setting in Office. Any suggestions for a fix? Thanks Stefan Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99782
 - 25
 - Entourage completely gone please help... did an automatic update and word, powerpoint and excel all updated, but no entourage,... it's completely deleted! Can anyone help with me with what I need to do to get my program back? Thanks! Tag: Receiving my own mail Tag: 99781

Version: 2008

I keep on receiving a copy of my sent mail as if I had sent a copy to me, which I did not. I don't know if I have used the "send diretly to me" icon, which I don't want to. How can I correct this?

Thanks.

Top

Re: Receiving my own mail by (=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Corentin_Cras-M=E9neur?=)

(=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Corentin_Cras-M=E9neur?=)
Tue Jul 22 09:45:31 CDT 2008

<Magda_Iglesias@officeformac.com> wrote:

> I keep on receiving a copy of my sent mail as if I had sent a copy to
> me, which I did not. I don't know if I have used the "send diretly to
> me" icon, which I don't want to. How can I correct this?

I suspect that you have a rule copying your sent mail to your inbox. You
should check the rules and the Mailing list manager.

Corentin

--
--- Mac:MS MVP http://www.cortig.net/wordpress/ ---
http://www.mvps.org - http://mvp.support.microsoft.com
MVPs are not MS employees - Les MVP ne travaillent pas pour MS
Remove "NoSpam" to e-mail me - Retirez "NoSpam" pour m'écrire

Top