> This message is in MIME format. Since your mail reader does not understand
this format, some or all of this message may not be legible.
--B_3196696914_8625774
Content-type: text/plain;
charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: 8bit
Why is the Entourage 2004 database format so much less flexible than the
Outlook PST file? I am disappointed that Spotlight won¹t be able to index
Entourage, even though most desktop search tools in Windows can index
Outlook. What is it about the formats that make them so different, and why
are they so different in terms of how extensible they are? I am not a
developer, but they appear similar, in that both incorporate a single
database approach.
I am genuinely curious as to why this is...if an MVP can answer this
question, I¹d appreciate it.
--B_3196696914_8625774
Content-type: text/html;
charset="ISO-8859-1"
Content-transfer-encoding: quoted-printable
<HTML>
<HEAD>
<TITLE>Entourage 2004 Database File Format...Extensibility?</TITLE>
</HEAD>
<BODY>
<FONT FACE=3D"Verdana, Helvetica, Arial"><SPAN STYLE=3D'font-size:12.0px'>Why i=
s the Entourage 2004 database format so much less flexible than the Outlook =
PST file? I am disappointed that Spotlight won’t be able to index Ento=
urage, even though most desktop search tools in Windows can index Outlook. W=
hat is it about the formats that make them so different, and why are they so=
different in terms of how extensible they are? I am not a developer, but th=
ey appear similar, in that both incorporate a single database approach.<BR>
<BR>
I am genuinely curious as to why this is...if an MVP can answer this questi=
on, I’d appreciate it.</SPAN></FONT>
</BODY>
</HTML>
--B_3196696914_8625774--