Don
Tue Oct 16 14:13:12 PDT 2007
"John" <jvasquez@cox.net> wrote in message
news:mb9ah35e4jb9dgcupsn7iqhe95ek4gkjcc@4ax.com...
> On Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:56:55 -0400, "Don Burn"
> <burn@stopspam.windrvr.com> wrote:
>
>>No, it does not say you have a pointer problem. All it says is you have a
>>problem. Drop SoftIce since it is worthless and unsupported. Take the
>>dump
>>and then do a !analyze with WinDbg and submit that to the group.
>
> Ok, Its not always a pointer problem. However, with my experience 90%
> of the time it was.
>
> Softice is great. I know it no longer supported in Vista but for XP it
> works perfectly. WinDbg is ok but it requires two computer, which
> sometimes I don't have.
>
> I have used WinDbg and I wasn't too thrilled about it. It took awhile
> for me to get debug statements to be transmitted over the serial port.
> And then when I made a change to the driver, it appeared that I had to
> reboot the target machine. In SoftIce when I make a change to the
> driver, I just have to unload and then reload the driver for the
> changes to take place. But I am a newbie to Windbg and probably not
> using it correctly. Also because of the serial inteface, debugging was
> very slow compared to Sotfice. It took what appears to be seconds
> for a breakpoint to be hit. Whereas, the same break point was
> instantanious.
>
The only way to find crashes well is !analyze. I gave up on SoftIce years
ago after discovering that SoftIce created bugs because they have
replacement of kernel functions that they implemented incorrectly.
--
Don Burn (MVP, Windows DDK)
Windows 2k/XP/2k3 Filesystem and Driver Consulting
Website:
http://www.windrvr.com
Blog:
http://msmvps.com/blogs/WinDrvr
Remove StopSpam to reply