RE: Error: Digital signature did not verify by bburgin
bburgin
Wed Sep 07 19:10:08 CDT 2005
------=_NextPart_0001_93913F28
Content-Type: text/plain
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
I'm working w/ Dan offline. He is using the old SNETCFG DDK sample to
install the driver and there is a known issue of that sample not doing two
SetupCopyOEMInfs, once for each of the two INFs needed for NDIS IM Filter
drivers. I suspect that he has both INFs in his Windows\Inf folder somehow
from a previous installation, but on his second installation only one is
copied and the installation is finding the second INF that it happens to
find left behind -- but its size/date/time etc is part of the signing
process and if it is at all different the signature will be broken.
If it's not that, then we'll move to SETUPAPI logging, etc. Also, it is
interesting that this is being reported against Server 2003 SP1 (all
platforms) and XP x64, which is based on the same code base -- so this may
be a new issue. But we'll try the SNETCFG change first.
Bryan S. Burgin
bburgin@online.microsoft.com
This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
------=_NextPart_0001_93913F28
Content-Type: text/x-rtf
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
{\rtf1\ansi\ansicpg1252\deff0\deflang1033{\fonttbl{\f0\fnil\fprq2\fcharset0 MS Sans Serif;}}
\viewkind4\uc1\pard\f0\fs20
\par
\par I'm working w/ Dan offline. He is using the old SNETCFG DDK sample to install the driver and there is a known issue of that sample not doing two SetupCopyOEMInfs, once for each of the two INFs needed for NDIS IM Filter drivers. I suspect that he has both INFs in his Windows\\Inf folder somehow from a previous installation, but on his second installation only one is copied and the installation is finding the second INF that it happens to find left behind -- but its size/date/time etc is part of the signing process and if it is at all different the signature will be broken.
\par
\par If it's not that, then we'll move to SETUPAPI logging, etc. Also, it is interesting that this is being reported against Server 2003 SP1 (all platforms) and XP x64, which is based on the same code base -- so this may be a new issue. But we'll try the SNETCFG change first.
\par
\par Bryan S. Burgin
\par bburgin@online.microsoft.com
\par
\par This posting is provided "AS IS" with no warranties, and confers no rights.
\par
\par }
------=_NextPart_0001_93913F28--