RE: MS CRM vs other products (Act, Goldmine, Siebel) by arksales
arksales
Tue Dec 07 13:45:02 CST 2004
All of the products you mentioned are differentiated (ACT!, Goldmine,
Siebel)...The product that most closely aligns with a comparison to MSCRM is
SalesLogix assuming you are automating up to 200 users.
SalesLogix has been called "ACT! on Steroids" by former ACT! users. It has
dominated the middle market and are integrated with major accounting packages.
Goldmine is also in the mid tier. The main complaint about Goldmine is its
complex screeens and interface. What the end users have to use daily.
MSCRM seems to be a good fit if the client is using Great Plains, The
company uses Outlook throughout the organization and has a good deal of
infrastructure.
Other products you did not mention are the web based ones such as
Salesforce.com and Salesnet. This are easy to deploy and are award winning.
"anonymous@discussions.microsoft.com" wrote:
> MS CRM compared to Act! is not a good comparison - they
> are not a good alignment to compare feature set.
>
> MS CRM is Microsoft's attempt at a 'customer relationship
> management' product (albeit currently incomplete, quite
> inflexible and requiring a pretty hefty investment in
> setup, etc.) whereas Act! is a contact manager - it is a
> tool for sales people w/o the support/service modules and
> other things that typically are part of CRM.
>
> Act! has just released a new version that comes in two
> falvors - both running on MS SQL server technology.
> Depending on the number of users you need, the 'standard'
> version list at about $229 and the premium version which
> includes MS SQL Server 2000 Standard goes for $399,
> supporting up to 50 users.
>
> What you need to do is look at your business needs, the
> existing LAN/PC infrastructure, your existing data that
> you would migrate, the projected size of the dataset, etc.
>
> Then, once you have a clearer understanding of what you
> need, start looking at products, not the other way
> around. A successful sales/CRM implementation needs to be
> business driven, not technology driven.
>
> If more businesses understood this, Microsoft would do a
> better job with their CRM product than they are...
>