Is it possible to have an orderbutton on a serviceactivity where you can find
the order that belongs to the serviceactivity just by clicking on the
orderbutton?

This can make sense if the following part works (systemnumber):

> We have a customer who would like to have a systemnumber (the field can be
> hidden) on every activity they create. So if you make a follow up activity on
> the orginally activity the new activity will have the same number. Because of
> that they will be connected to eachother.
> So after a process is done you can follow the activityprocedure from A-Z.
> The ultimate would be if you also had offers, orders and other modules
> connected to the follow up actvivities that they also should be connected to
> the process.
> Does anyone have any suggestion how to solve this?


Unfortunately you will have to get into the Microsoft CRM SDK and develop a
set of (for CRM v3) Pre-Callouts or (for CRM v4) Plugins which will set the
autonumbers for Activities or Orders as you add them.
Usually this is just a case of an incremental number for each Activity or
Order added into the CRM system - however in your case you may need to use
the CRM Web Service to add the relevant logic to produce something similar to
the following example:
First Activity associated to an Order (5) is numbered 5-001, second activity
05-002. Then may extend this to that any Invoice created from Order 5 is
also labeled as Invoice 5, and any activities created regarding this Invoice
follow the same numbering format. (5-003 and so on)
Whilst this will involve developing a .NET module, it should not overly tax
a proficient developer. Like any development however, it is worth
considering whether the business requirement is required enough to justify
the investment.

RE: An orderbutton on a serviceactivity by RobMottram

RobMottram
Wed Jul 16 06:59:24 CDT 2008

If you are using CRM4 you could just add another relationship between
ServicecActivity and Order. This would allow you to have an Order field on
service activity which could be clicked on to open the service activity.

You could even just make the service activity regarding the order, which
would also do the same thing.

In both cases, you could also go to the order, to see a list of all service
activities link to it.

Hope this is of some help

Rob

"Martin" wrote:

> Is it possible to have an orderbutton on a serviceactivity where you can find
> the order that belongs to the serviceactivity just by clicking on the
> orderbutton?
>
> This can make sense if the following part works (systemnumber):
>
> > We have a customer who would like to have a systemnumber (the field can be
> > hidden) on every activity they create. So if you make a follow up activity on
> > the orginally activity the new activity will have the same number. Because of
> > that they will be connected to eachother.
> > So after a process is done you can follow the activityprocedure from A-Z.
> > The ultimate would be if you also had offers, orders and other modules
> > connected to the follow up actvivities that they also should be connected to
> > the process.
> > Does anyone have any suggestion how to solve this?
>
>
> Unfortunately you will have to get into the Microsoft CRM SDK and develop a
> set of (for CRM v3) Pre-Callouts or (for CRM v4) Plugins which will set the
> autonumbers for Activities or Orders as you add them.
> Usually this is just a case of an incremental number for each Activity or
> Order added into the CRM system - however in your case you may need to use
> the CRM Web Service to add the relevant logic to produce something similar to
> the following example:
> First Activity associated to an Order (5) is numbered 5-001, second activity
> 05-002. Then may extend this to that any Invoice created from Order 5 is
> also labeled as Invoice 5, and any activities created regarding this Invoice
> follow the same numbering format. (5-003 and so on)
> Whilst this will involve developing a .NET module, it should not overly tax
> a proficient developer. Like any development however, it is worth
> considering whether the business requirement is required enough to justify
> the investment.
>
>